No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edgewood Manor Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

1330 S Fulton St, Port Clinton, OH 43452 · For profit - Partnership · 80 certified beds · (419) 734-5506 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
619 Fulton St · (419) 732-2614 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 Madison St · (419) 732-3151 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
60 N Madison St · (419) 732-3080 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(419) 627-2350 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
900 S Jefferson St · (419) 732-3800

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.1%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.2%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.9%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.5%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
33.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.1%CMS range 38.8–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge14.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.331.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-08)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-24)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital discharge instruction reviewed, witness statement review, fall occurrence evaluation review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring two staff members for bed mobility was implemented which resulted in a fall from the bed with an injury. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #65, who was moderately cognitively impaired, required the assistance of two staff for bed mobility sustained a fall from bed, when one staff member was providing care, and the resident fell to the floor. Resident #65 experienced left leg pain and was transferred to the hospital and returned with diagnosis of a supracondylar fracture of the left femur (fracture of the shaft of the left femur), requiring a cast from the foot to the hip and treatment for pain. This affected one resident (Resident #65) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the facility electronic closed medical record for Resident #65…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of medical record, review of hospital records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care was timely ordered and implemented for one resident (#53) of three residents (#52, and #64) reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 04/30/25 with diagnoses including anxiety, injury of unspecified kidney, hypothyroidism, altered mental status (AMS), osteoarthritis, asthma, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bipolar disorder, cellulitis, cerebral infarctions, chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, hyperlipidemia, diverticulitis of intestine, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), insomnia, suicidal ideations (SI), bipolar II disorder, and other long-term (current) drug therapy. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/05/25, revealed a Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of medical record, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices were implemented. This affected Resident #53 with the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 04/30/25 with diagnoses including anxiety, injury of unspecified kidney, hypothyroidism, altered mental status (AMS), osteoarthritis, asthma, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bipolar disorder, cellulitis, cerebral infarctions, chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, hyperlipidemia, diverticulitis of intestine, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), insomnia, suicidal ideations (SI), bipolar II disorder, and other long-term (current) drug therapy.Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/05/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure timely interventions were provided to address resident incontinence patterns. This affected one (#5) of four residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, right rib fracture, cognitive communication deficit, fibromyalgia, hypertension, cerebral infarction with left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and polyneuropathy. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #5 was assessed with intact cognition, no history of refusal or behavior, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, was incontinent of bowel and bladder,and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown. On 12/11/24 a nursing plan of care was implemented to address Resident #5's risk for impaired skin integrity related to hemiparesis, hemiplegia, incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained and administered in a secure manner. This affected one resident (#4) observed with medications unattended at the bedside. The facility identified five cognitively impaired independently mobile residents(#19, #24, #25, #26, #27) with a total facility census of 66. Findings include; Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, psychosis, anxiety disorder, depression, paranoid schizophrenia, auditory hallucinations, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #4 had intact cognition, no recorded behavior or rejection of care, required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living, was incontinent of bladder, and received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and hypoglycemic medications. Observation on 03/12/25 at 9:09 A.M. noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, employee file review, self reported incident review and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by staff. This affected two (#14 and #60) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility electronic medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses include pneumonia, dysphagia, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, unspecified fracture of shaft of left fibula, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), congestive heart failure (CHF), anemia, supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), respiratory failure with hypercapnia, fibromyalgia, alcohol abuse, obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dependence on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, Enhanced Information Dissemination and Collection (EIDC) system review, witness statement review, fall occurrence review, and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an incidence of potential neglect to the appropriate state agency. This affected one (#65) of three resident reviewed for reporting potential abuse and neglect. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the facility electronic closed medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 09/20/22, with diagnoses of unspecified B-cell lymphoma, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, dementia, type two diabetes (DM2), cataract, anorexia, cachexia, reduced mobility, weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperlipidemia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, stage four chronic kidney disease (CKD), gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD), hypertension (HTN), overactive bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were maintained for residents in isolation. This affected one resident (Resident #54) of one resident reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the facility electronic medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses of cellulitis, other gram-negative sepsis, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), heart failure, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of unspecified lower leg, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of right lower leg, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of left lower leg, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified heel and midfoot, other disorders of plasma-protein metabolism, other disorders of glycoprotein metabolism, other signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system, acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the staffing schedule, interviews with staff, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure required Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents. Findings include: Review of staff timesheets for 01/21/24, 03/02/24, 03/16/24, 03/17/24, 03/30/24, 03/31/24, 06/29/24, and 06/30/24 revealed the facility did not have a Registered Nurse (RN) working a minimum of eight hours a day. Interview on 07/03/24 at 3:25 P.M. with the Administrator verified the facility did not have a RN working a minimum of eight hours a day on the above dates. Review of policy, Staffing, dated September 2021, verified the facility will maintain adequate staffing on each shift to ensure the resident's needs and services are met. Licensed registered nursing and licensed nursing staff are available to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the pest control service logs, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 65 of 65 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observations during an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/01/24 beginning at approximately 7:40 A.M. revealed excessive buildup and grime in between and behind the fryer and stove, buildup and debris on the lower part of a metal food cart being used for resident meal trays, buildup and debris located on the floor and along the edges of the walls surrounding the interior side of an exit door located in the dry storage room, and excessive buildup which was black in color located under tables and appliances throughout the kitchen. During observations and interviews on 07/02/24 beginning at approximately 12:40 P.M., Regional Dietary Manager #391 verified the debris and buildup on the floors and meal cart. Review of facility pest control service logs dated 05/17/24 and 06/21/24 revealed the kitchen was inspected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews with staff, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure instances of resident elopement were reported for Resident #54. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff allegations of a unlicensed staff member administering unprescribed melatonin were reported for four (#3, #29, #55, and #60) residents. This affected five (Residents #3, #29, #54, #55, and #60) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, hyo-osmolality and hyponatremia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of distal lower extremity, schizophrenia, and anxiety order. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews with residents, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of unlicensed staff administered unprescribed melatonin to residents. This affected four (Residents #3, #29, #55, and #60) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. Review of the current physician orders from 07/24 for Resident #3 revealed she was prescribed melatonin 1 milligram (mg) at bedtime. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #3 revealed she was cognitively impaired. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date of 08/16/24 and a re-admission date of 03/08/24 with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease Review of the significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively impaired. Review of the current physician orders for 07/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident representative interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected 28 (#3, #5, #14, #15, #18, #20, #22, #23, #26, #27, #29, #32, #33, #34, #36, #38, #39, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #51 #52, #55, #56, #60, and #61) residents residing in the memory care unit. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 07/01/24 at 10:16 A.M. of the memory care unit revealed the flooring of the edges of the hallways had a thick layer of dust and grime. Observation on 07/01/24 at 2:08 P.M. of Resident #60's room revealed the flooring, specifically around the corners and edges were unclean with built-up substance. Observation on 07/02/24 at 3:50 P.M. of the memory care unit revealed the flooring of the edges of the hallways had a thick layer of dust and grime. Resident #60's room flooring, specifically around the corners and edges remained unclean. In addition, Resident #45's room flooring around the corners and edges were unclean with a layer of dust.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of the facility census, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from staff to resident verbal abuse. This affected one (#16) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the SRI dated 05/14/24 revealed Resident #16 was stating that a State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) was verbally abusive to her. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, sleep deprivation, urge incontinence, anxiety, depression, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively intact. The resident was always incontinent of urine and bowel and required staff assistance for a majority of the activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident elopement. This affected one (#54) of three residents reviewed for elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for one (#58) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of distal lower extremity, schizophrenia, and anxiety order. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/25/24, revealed the resident was rarely understood. The resident required the use of a wheelchair and was dependent for toileting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received oxygen at the correct rate as prescribed by the physician. This affected one (Resident #16) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, sleep deprivation, urge incontinence, anxiety, depression, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was always incontinent of urine and bowel and required staff assistance for a majority of the activities of daily living. The resident received oxygen. Review of Resident #16's physician orders for July 2024 identified a current order dated 08/03/23 for two liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #16's plan of care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to discard expired insulin. This affected three residents (#18, #32, and #38) reviewed for insulin storage. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II. Review of the current physician orders for 07/24 for Resident #18 revealed an order for novolog flex insulin pen. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II. Review of the current physician orders for 07/24 for Resident #32 revealed an order for fiasp insulin pen. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II. Review of the current physician orders for 07/24 for Resident #38 revealed an order for novolog insulin. Observations on [DATE] at 8:52 A.M. of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the pharmacy recommendation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed per pharmacist recommendation and physician order. This affected one (#53) of one resident reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, obesity, muscle weakness, anxiety, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 as cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care, revised 08/23/23, revealed Resident #53 had an impaired metabolic status related to diabetes and obesity. Interventions included monitoring labs/diagnostic testing per physician order. Review of Resident #53's medical record including laboratory results revealed the last Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident council minutes review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. This had the potential to affect 65 of 65 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Interview with Resident #21 on 08/15/22 at 3:48 P.M., revealed the food was horrible, cold and not at all appetizing. Interview with Resident #24 on 08/15/22 at 11:41 A.M., revealed the food was cold and not palatable. Interview with Resident #33 on 08/15/22 at 10:27 A.M., revealed the was food cold and there is no variety. Interview with Resident #60 on 08/15/22 at 10:33 A.M., revealed the food was cold and terrible. He stated he would send the food back to be reheated but would be cold again by the time the staff brought it back. Resident #60 stated the facility used to give out a monthly menu, but they discontinued to do so. The menu failed to be followed when it was distributed. Interview with Resident #64 on 08/15/22 at 10:50 A.M., revealed all meals were served cold and were not palatable. Review of the test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the kitchen. This has the potential to affect 65 of 65 residents receiving food and drink from the kitchen and who reside in the facility. The census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 08/16/22 between 9:27 A.M. and 10:00 A.M., of the kitchen, with Kitchen Manager #437 revealed: the box refrigerator with cartons of milk contained a white frosty substance halfway down all four sides of the walls of the refrigerator. The white substance flaked off the side walls and fell to the bottom of the refrigerator. The ceiling above the serving station and the lights above the stove and steam table contained dust and dirt. The water dispensing silver colored valve contained a quarter inch long black substance. Interview, at the time of the observation, with Kitchen Manager #437 revealed uncertainty of the last time the water dispensing machine machine was cleaned. Kitchen Manager #437 removed the substance from the dispenser and the black, slimy substance smeared in the paper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide showers for residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living. This affected six (Residents #36, #41, #45, #60, #64 and #20) of six residents reviewed for showers and baths. The census was 67. 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/27/22. Diagnosis included peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, prostate cancer, and atherosclerosis. Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/06/22, revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive function. The resident required an extensive assist of one person for personal hygiene, bathing, and dressing. Review of Resident #36's most recent care plan revealed the resident had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to chronic kidney disease, fluctuating activities of daily living, and generalized weakness. During an interview on 08/15/22 at 10:05 A.M., Resident #36 stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete annual evaluations on State Tested Nursing Aides (STNA). This affected four (#322, #327, #420, #424) of four STNA employee files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of STNA #322's employee file revealed a hire date of 04/22/14. The employee file did not contain a yearly employee evaluation for the past 12 months. Review of STNA #327's employee file revealed a hire date of 07/03/19. The employee file did not contain a yearly employee evaluation for the past 12 months. Review of STNA #420's employee file revealed a hire date of 01/25/05. The employee file did not contain a yearly employee evaluation for the past 12 months. Review of STNA #424's employee file revealed a hire date of 12/05/18. The employee file did not contain a yearly employee evaluation for the past 12 months. Interview on 08/18/22 at 9:16 A.M., with the Director of Nursing verified STNAs, #322, #327, #420, and #424 failed to have their annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of staff in-services, review of Centers for Disease Control for Prevention (CDC)guidance, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices and procedures were in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen area on 08/15/22 between 9:00 A.M. and 9:32 A.M. revealed the following: Dietary Aide (DA) #313 was noted scooping topping onto cakes in small round white foam containers. DA #313 was observed without a face mask as required by current recommendations. DA #313 had face mask pulled down under chin. Cook #418 was observed cleaning dishes and cooking at the stove top without face mask as required by current recommendations. [NAME] #418 was observed with face mask below chin. Additional observations on 08/15/22 from 11:35 A.M. to 12:50 P.M. revealed the following: At 11:35 A.M., [NAME] #418 took food temperatures without face mask to cover nose and mouth, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for residents. This affected seven (Residents #5, #24, #38, #40, #50, #53 and #122) of fourteen residents observed for lunch in the dining room. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Observation of the dining room on 08/15/22 between 12:15 P.M. and 12:50 P.M. revealed three tables with two residents each and eight tables with one resident. The three tables with two residents at each table were not served together. Resident #53 and #122 shared the last table along the left wall. Resident #122 received food after Resident #53 had eaten and left the dining room. Resident #40 and Resident #50 sat at a table together in the middle of the dining room in front of the vending machine. Resident #50 was served at 12:25 P.M. and Resident #40 was served at 12:32 P.M. Resident #50 waited to eat until Resident #40 received food. Resident #24 and #38 shared a table to the left of the kitchen window. Resident #38 received food at 12:28 P.M. and Resident #24 received food at 12:35 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to reassess the effectiveness of interventions and failed to review and update the comprehensive care plan for a resident. This affected one (Resident #53) of 22 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Resident #53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type II, acute kidney failure, displaced intertrochanteric left femur fracture, hypertension, depression, morbid obesity, osteoarthritis, and iron deficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/15/22, revealed Resident #53 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #53 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and required the assistance of two personal for bathing. Resident #53 was independent with eating. Review of the physician order dated 04/10/22 revealed a regular diet with mechanical soft ground meats. A physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was maintained to prevent infection. This affected one (Resident #44) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/27/22. Diagnosis included infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, dysphasia, Huntington's disease, gout, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive function. The resident had an indwelling catheter and was always continent of bowel. Review of Resident #44's most recent care plan revealed the resident had a need for an indwelling catheter related to acute urinary retention due to benign prostatic hypertension. Catheter care was required each shift. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a physician's order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required dialysis was receiving the care and treatment according to physician orders and failed to maintain communication with the dialysis center on coordination of care. This affected one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/16/22, with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, hyperkalemia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, type II, anemia, and hypertension. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #61 was cognitively intact, had clear speech and was able to understand others and able to make self-understood. Resident #61 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required total dependence for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records were maintained. This affected one (Resident #61) of 22 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/16/22, with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, hyperkalemia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, type II, anemia, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #61 was cognitively intact, had clear speech and was able to understand others and able to make self-understood. Resident #61 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required total dependence for transfers. Resident #61 was occasionally incontinent of urine and was dependent on renal dialysis. Review of physician orders revealed an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-28 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate. This affected one resident (#17) of 19 reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #17 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of the first lumbar vertebra, fracture with delayed healing and low back pain. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/13/18 to administer Tramadol (opioid pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) two tablets every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 03/2019 revealed the resident was administered two Tramadol 50 mg tablets on 03/27/19 at 4:22 A.M., 03/28/19 at 12:03 P.M. and 03/31/19 at 3:39 P.M. Review of the resident's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 04/02/19, section N0300 H, revealed the resident did not receive an opioid pain medication during the seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident safety while smoking. This affected three residents (#20, #24, and #48) of four residents reviewed for smoking. In addition, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as ordered and care planned. This affected one resident (#19) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/28/17. Diagnosis included diabetes mellitus type 2, hemiplegia, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Resident was noted to be cognitively intact. Interview on 08/25/19 at 2:34 P.M. with Resident #20 revealed the resident maintains cigarettes and lighter in his/her personal possession. Review of Resident #20's annual Smoking Safety Screen dated 07/31/19 revealed staff were to keep the resident's cigarettes and lighter. Observation on 08/26/19 at 3:12 P.M. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely transmit a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This affected one (#1) of 22 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the survey. The census was 64. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/14/17. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of upper end of unspecified tibia, secondary Parkinsonism, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessments revealed the most recently completed annual MDS assessment was completed and transmitted on 01/11/19. Resident #1 had quarterly MDS assessments completed on 04/08/19 and 07/01/19, however, the quarterly MDS assessment completed on 07/01/19 was not transmitted to CMS. During review of Resident #1's MDS assessments, the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was marked as completed, however not locked, or transmitted to CMS as of 08/28/19 at 9:00 A.M. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely. This affected two residents (#33 and #28) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #33 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder and anxiety. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/22/19, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed the resident was prescribed Buspirone 10 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime for anxiety. Review of the resident's monthly pharmacy review report, dated 03/22/19, revealed it was a repeated recommendation for the physician to consider a gradual dose reduction from 10 mg twice a day to 7.5 mg twice a day. The date of the original recommendation request was 01/27/19 and the facility was asked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medication. This affected one resident (#204) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #204 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified chronic pain due to trauma, anxiety. Review of the resident's discharge orders, dated 08/19/19, from an acute care hospital revealed the resident was not ordered any antibiotic medications. Review of the resident's 08/19/19 facility admission orders revealed the resident was ordered Zithromax (antibiotic) 250 milligrams (mg) daily for infection. Review of Resident #204's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was administered Zithromax 250 mg daily, in the morning, from 08/20/19 through 08/27/19. Interview on 08/27/19 at 1:44 P.M., with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CROWN OHIO HOLDCO INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/20/2018
MOZART REALTY VENTURES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 09/20/2018
CROWN I TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/09/2021
FEJCC TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
MDATAS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
MRS FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
FRIEDMAN, YISRAELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
SINGER, MEIRIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/20/2018
DAUBENMIRE, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
ALDA, RUGENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
SWINEHART, FRANKLINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
BASCH, ZISSYIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 7%Other / private 14%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$332per resident / day
operating cost
$10,103per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$321per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365489. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next