No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wright Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

829 Yellow Springs - Fairfield Rd, Fairborn, OH 45324 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (937) 878-7046 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 878-7046 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
850 E Xenia Dr · (937) 878-8644 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
900 N Broad St · (937) 878-4493 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2130 Sycamore St · (937) 200-6112 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1006 W Yellow Springs-Fairfield Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1082 Rona Parkway Dr · (937) 878-6993

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.8%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.2%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.9%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.4%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.4%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.1%CMS range 50.2–68.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.6–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.1–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
64.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 85.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-09)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility food safety policy, the facility failed to ensure food and food preparation services were protected from potential contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility that received food from the kitchen, except one resident (#95) with an active NPO (nothing by mouth) order during the survey. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/02/26 at 10:50 A.M. revealed one red bucket and one green bucket stored on the floor of the kitchen at the end of the food service line, adjacent to the prep sink and juice machine. Both buckets were observed holding washcloths in liquid solutions. Interview on 03/02/26 at approximately 10:51 A.M. with Dietary Manager #259 revealed the buckets stored on the floor were for detergent and sanitizer solutions that hold washcloths used to wipe down kitchen equipment such as food prep counters. Further interview at this time revealed Dietary Manager #259 believed the floor was likely not the best storage location for washcloths/sanitizer solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of a facility recipe for pureed food, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared to the proper consistency and texture before serving the food to residents. This had the potential to affect seven (#15, #17, #7, #21, #26, #43, and #61) residents identified by the facility with pureed texture dietary orders. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observation on 03/04/26 at 10:20 A.M. revealed [NAME] #320 placed seven scoops of diced ham into a food processor, along with an unidentified amount of chicken broth to begin making the pureed ham entree for lunch service. Further observation at this time revealed [NAME] #320 added two spoons of powdered thickening additive to the food processor, after the cook asked to be handed a teaspoon to measure powdered thickening additive. Interview on 03/04/26 at 10:20 A.M. with [NAME] #320 revealed they were unsure of the exact amount of chicken broth they added in with the ham to start pureeing the food, they believed the amount of broth added was around one-half liquid cup.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, and family interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notification of a room change. This affected one (#95) of one residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #95 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: aphasia, vascular dementia, hallucinations, altered mental status, esophageal obstruction. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07. This resident was assessed to be dependent with all care. Resident has a feeding tube. Review of the care plan dated 02/25/26 revealed vascular dementia with mood disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #95's progress notes revealed there was no documentation regarding the resident being moved to a different room, family notification or a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and home-like environment. This affected one (#93) of two residents review for the physical environment. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #93 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Calculus of bile duct with cholangitis or cholecystitis without obstructive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07. MDS admission was in progress. Observation on 03/02/26 at 12:06 P.M. revealed a two-inch round pile of flower potted soil substance that stood one-inch high was under the middle of Resident #93's bed more towards to head of the bed. Three small spots were located under the bed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assessments and monitoring of a resident who tested positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This affected one (#92) of one residents reviewed for COVID-19. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #92 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: encephalopathy, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bronchitis. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated in progress revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. This resident was assessed to be bladder incontinent. Review of the care plan dated 02/28/26 revealed Resident #92 had COVID-19 with interventions which include lab/cultures/diagnostic testing as ordered and report results to physician. Review with resident the importance of good handwashing, assist as needed. Encourage fluids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a proper bed rail assessment, including measurements of the air mattress and obtaining proper consent. This affected one (#96) out of one residents reviewed for siderails. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #96 revealed an admission date of 07/22/25 with diagnoses of unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, spondylopathy in diseases classified elsewhere, cervical region, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, wedge compression fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 08/19/25 revealed Resident #96 had activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to severe lower back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications, when one resident received antibiotics without a an adequate indication for use. This affected one (#10) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed an admission date of 03/11/22 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset, chronic kidney disease, stage 3, essential (primary) hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms. Further review revealed Resident #10 did not have a diagnosis of or history of diverticulitis or diverticulosis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had moderate cognitive impairment and was not on an antibiotic. Review of the physician's progress noted dated 02/27/26 revealed resident was lethargic and wanted to sleep a lot, medication reduction was ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were documented in a resident's medical record. This affected one (#95) out of three residents reviewed for medical record documentation. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #95 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: aphasia, vascular dementia, hallucinations, altered mental status, esophageal obstruction. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07. This resident was assessed to be dependent with all care. Resident has a feeding tube. Review of the care plan dated 02/25/26 revealed vascular dementia with mood disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #95's progress notes revealed there was no documentation regarding wandering events or behaviors,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, witness statements, physician notes and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse of one Resident (#11) of three reviewed. The facility census was 82. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including aphasia following stroke, paraplegia, anxiety and neuromuscular dysfunction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #11 required set up for eating and was dependent for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting hygiene. Review of the progress note dated 11/11/25, written by Registered Nurse (RN) #111, revealed an unnamed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) alerted a female resident (Resident #10) was observed in Resident #11's room with her hand on his penis stroking up and down. Resident #11 was documented to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents residing in a secure memory care unit were observed when outside the unit. This affected one Resident (#10) of three reviewed. The facility census was 82. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 03/15/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, stroke, aphasia following stroke, schizophrenia and Wernicke's encephalopathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. She required set up assistance with eating, bed mobility, transfers, and toileting hygiene.Review of the care plan revealed Resident #10 was a supervised smoker, was an elopement risk, and had aggressive behaviors.Review of the progress note dated 11/11/25 at 8:45 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #111 documented an unnamed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was sent out to the hospital in a timely manner after a fall with a fracture. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility also failed to ensure incontinent care was provided per standard this affected one, (#38) of three reviewed for incontinent care and had the potential to affect the 58 residents the facility identified as being incontinent. The census was 89. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 12/20/24. Admitting diagnoses were multiple fractures of ribs with routine healing, ulcerative colitis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was moderately cognitively impaired. Her functional status was set up or clean-up assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers were partial/moderate assistance. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure an X-ray was ordered and implemented in a timely manner. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for X-rays. The census was 89. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 12/20/24. Admitting diagnoses were multiple fractures of ribs with routine healing, ulcerative colitis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was moderately cognitively impaired. Her functional status was set up or clean-up assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers were partial/moderate assistance. She was frequently incontinent with her bowel and bladder. Review of the physician orders dated 01/17/25 revealed a Stat X-ray of left knee, left femur, left hip, and unilateral with pelvis when performed. Review of the progress notes from 01/17/25 at 4:45 P.M. to 01/18/25 11:48 A.M. there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control was maintained during incontinence care. This affected one (#38) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility identified there were 58 residents who were incontinent. The census was 89. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 09/06/17. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, renal insufficiency, and seizure disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was substantial/maximal assistance for eating and transfers, dependent on toileting, partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. She was coded on this assessment as being always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 12/07/24 revealed Resident #38 was incontinent for bowel and bladder. Interventions included: assist for toileting needs, monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for wound care dressing. This affected one (Resident #85) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 08/03/24 . Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of the left lower leg, essential hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, other heart failure, hypokalemia, generalized anxiety disorder, type II diabetes, and insomnia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #85 was at risk for skin breakdown. Review of the medical record revealed a physician's order dated 07/26/24 for ace wraps to stay on bilateral lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not misappropriated. This affected two (Residents #32, #84) of three reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 06/11/22. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #32 required maximum assistance with toileting, bed mobility, transfers and supervision for eating. Review of physician orders for Resident #32 revealed an order for Oxycodone (pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered. This affected one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 06/11/22. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of Resident #32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required maximum assistance with toileting, bed mobility, transfers, and supervision for eating. Review of physician orders for Resident #32 revealed an order for Furosemide (diuretic) 40 milligrams (mg) daily, Levothyroxine (thyroid) 125 micrograms (mcg) daily, Omeprazole (reflux) 20 mg daily, Baclofen (pain) 10 mg every eight hours, Gabapentin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide specific and specialized training staff working on the Memory Care unit. This had to potential to affect 15 (#11, #22, #23, #30, #40, #44, #47, #48, #49, #52, #53, #54 ,#58, #324 #325) of 15 residents residing on the Memory Care unit. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Employee record review revealed State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #433 was hired on 10/18/21. Further review of the employee file for STNA #433 revealed no evidence of receiving training specific to the Memory Care Unit upon hire to the facility or since. Employee record review revealed STNA #479 was hired on 09/13/21. Further review of the employee file for STNA #479 revealed no evidence of receiving training specific to the Memory Care Unit upon hire to the facility or since. Employee record review revealed STNA #487 was hired on 02/27/23. Further review of the employee file for STNA #487 revealed no evidence of receiving training specific to the Memory Care Unit upon hire to the facility or since. Employee record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents needs were met by answering call lights in a timely manner. This affected two (#124 and #126) of two residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 78. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #124 revealed an admission date of 03/0723, with diagnoses including stroke and arthritis. Review of 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #124 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was limited assistance for bed mobility and transfers. She was a supervision for eating and extensive assistance for toilet use. She was always continent for bowel and bladder. Observation on 03/13/23 at 1:49 P.M., revealed Resident #124 was in bed and pulled her call light because she had to go to the bathroom. At 1:54 P.M., Hospitality Aide (HA) #419 came into the room and asked what Resident #124 needed and Resident #124 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice and physician order related to advance directives. This affected one (#73) of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #73 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and died at the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included diabetes mellitus 2, hypoglycemia, cardiac murmur, altered mental status, essential primary hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #73's care plan for code status, dated [DATE], revealed she was a full code. An intervention was listed as, periodically review advance directives with the resident/family, initiated [DATE]. Review of physician visit dated [DATE], for Resident #73 revealed the physician reviewed advanced directives during the visit. Implication of new code status reviewed with patient/representative and understanding was verbalized. Code status has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete an investigation related to potential misappropriation of a resident's personal belongings. This affected one (#46) of three residents reviewed for potential misappropriation. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #46 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included diabetes mellitus 2, cellulitis, benign neoplasm of colon, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and insomnia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/24/23, revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #46 required extensive assistance from staff with transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #46 required limited assistance from staff with eating. Interview on 03/13/23 at 11:34 A.M., with Resident #46 revealed the resident reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were screened for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) services upon admission and after new diagnoses for serious mental illness. This affected two(#36 and #59) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute on chronic combined congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, type II diabetes, unspecified dementia, unspecified bipolar disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified major depressive disorder and paranoid schizophrenia ([DATE]). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 36 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #36 was a two-person assist, required supervision with eating, and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan to meet a resident's dental needs. This affected one (#41) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/23/21, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction due to unspecified stenosis of the right middle cerebral artery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, unspecified chronic kidney disease, and unspecified major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander and did not reject care. Resident #41 was a one-person assist. Resident #41 required extensive assistance with bed mobility and supervision with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Review of the care plans dated 06/06/22 revealed Resident #41 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to hold timely care conferences. This affected two (#21 and #36) of 24 residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 21 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified vascular dementia, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #21 was a one person assist, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, and supervision assistance with eating and locomotion. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered and obtain orders for a treatment. In addition, the facility failed to clean scissors prior to use and perform hand hygiene during wound care. This affected two (#6 and #46) of six residents reviewed for wound treatments. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified interstitial pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, acute on chronic combined congestive heart failure, and unspecified stage III chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 6 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 had physician orders dated 03/05/23, to cleanse right wrist skin tear with normal saline/pat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility to ensure wounds were assessed and staged timely and failed ot ensure pressure relieving devices were in place to prevent skin impairments. This affected two (#34 and #11) of five reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified there were five pressure ulcers in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed an admission of 09/07/22, with diagnoses that included other neurological conditions, heart failure, renal insufficiency, urinary tract infection, diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebrovascular attack (CVA), anxiety, and depression. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 revealed was cognitively intact, with functional status of extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use with two-person assistance. Resident #34 eating was supervision and was frequently incontinent for bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for a resident. This affected one (#286) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #286 revealed an admission date of 12/27/22, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, anxiety, vascular dementia, polyarthritis, essential primary hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/17/23 revealed Resident #286 had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #286 required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene and required limited assistance from staff with eating. Review of the fall care plan for Resident #286 revealed, dycem to wheelchair, dated 03/15/23. Further review of the fall care plan for Resident #286 mat on floor next to floor next to bed when occupied, dated 12/28/22. Review of the fall report for Resident #286, dated 03/06/23 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment for incontinence care and ensure hand washing was completed post care. This affected one (#34) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility identified there was 51 incontinent residents. The facility census was 78. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed an admission of 09/07/22, with diagnoses that included other neurological conditions, heart failure, renal insufficiency, urinary tract infection, diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebrovascular attack (CVA), anxiety, and depression. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 revealed was cognitively intact, with functional status of extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use with two-person assistance. Resident #34 eating was supervision and was frequently incontinent for bowel and bladder. Observation on 03/15/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received required dental services to meet the residents dental needs. This affected one (#41) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/23/21, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction due to unspecified stenosis of the right middle cerebral artery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, unspecified chronic kidney disease, and unspecified major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander and did not reject care. Resident #41 was a one-person assist. Resident #41 required extensive assistance with bed mobility and supervision with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Review of the care plans dated 06/06/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents meals do not include food identified as an allergy. This affected two (#21 and #42) of two residents reviewed for food allergies. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified vascular dementia, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #21 was a one person assist, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene, and supervision assistance with eating and locomotion. Review of Resident #21's nutrition care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked. This had the potential to affect twenty-three of twenty-five residents who were independently mobile residing on the west hallway. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Observation on 02/09/20 at 9:11 A.M. of an unlocked and unattended medication cart on the west hall. There were two residents observed independently ambulating in their wheelchairs in the hallway at that time. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #137 was observed sitting at the nursing station at the end of the hall. The medication cart was approximately half-way down the hallway. Interview on 02/09/20 at 9:12 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the west hall medication cart was unlocked and unattended. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles, dated 12/01/07, revealed the facility should ensure all medications are securely stored in a locked cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's significant weight loss in a timely manner. This affected one (#35) of four residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility identified 10 residents with weight loss. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #35's weight history at the facility were as follows: • On 09/13/19, he weighed 167 pounds (lbs.) and this weight was striked out by Dietician #160 on 12/04/19 at 12:32 P.M. • On 10/03/19, he weighed 168 lbs. and this weight was striked out by Dietician #160 on 12/04/19 at 12:32 P.M. • On 10/05/19, he weighed 169 lbs. and this weight was striked out by Dietician #160 on 12/04/19 at 12:32 P.M. • On 11/01/19, he weighed 170 lbs. • On 11/02/19, he weighed 153 lbs. • On 12/01/19, he weighed 147 lbs. • On 12/02/19, he weighed 148 lbs. • On 01/02/20, he weighed 142 lbs. • On 01/20/20, he weighed 143 lbs. • On 02/02/20, he weighed 140 lbs. •…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident and review of the facility's abuse policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not thoroughly investigating an allegation of abuse and reporting an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/20, revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired. His functional status was extensive assistant for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use and he was a supervision for eating. Review of Resident #35's progress notes, dated 12/23/19 at 6:55 A.M., written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #141, revealed at 6:50 A.M. a shower aide was about to give Resident #4 a shower when she heard the resident cursing at shower aide and Resident #35. Resident #4 called shower aide several vulgar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/20, revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired. His functional status was extensive assistant for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use and he was a supervision for eating. Review of Resident #35's progress notes, dated 12/23/19 at 6:55 A.M., written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #141, revealed at 6:50 A.M. a shower aide was about to give Resident #4 a shower when she heard the resident cursing at shower aide and Resident #35. Resident #4 called shower aide several vulgar names, including racial slurs. When LPN #141 attempted to intervene, the resident then called this nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/20, revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired. His functional status was extensive assistant for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use and he was a supervision for eating. Review of Resident #35's progress notes, dated 12/23/19 at 6:55 A.M., written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #141, revealed at 6:50 A.M. a shower aide was about to give Resident #4 a shower when she heard the resident cursing at shower aide and Resident #35. Resident #4 called shower aide several vulgar names, including racial slurs. When LPN #141 attempted to intervene, the resident then called this nurse a 'expletive'. Resident #4 was trying to stand up, out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care for a resident who received oxygen. This affected one (Resident #32) of eighteen residents reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/16 with diagnoses including pneumothorax, generalized anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of the lungs, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia. Review of the physician order, dated 09/10/19, revealed orders to rinse and replace intake filter every week and to change oxygen tubing every twenty-eight days. On 11/29/19, an order to monitor oxygen saturation every shift. On 12/16/19, there were orders to have the humidification to the oxygen to be continuous and administer oxygen at two liters per minute per nasal cannula continuous. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/19, revealed the resident was ordered and received oxygen. Review of Resident #32's plan of care dated 12/31/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to hold activities that met the needs of the residents residing on the memory care unit. This affected three (Resident #10, #11, and #63) of three residents reviewed for activities. This had the potential to affect all 11 residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 08/10/16 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data S(MDS) assessment, dated 11/06/19, revealed the resident was rarely/never understood and required limited to extensive staff assist with all activities of daily living (ADL) aside from eating and walking in her room. Review of the activity care plan revealed the resident response to music activities, exercise, enjoys walking with staff, and interacting with other residents and needs one on one assistance in groups. The goal was for the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview with staff and resident and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of a resident who had a history of smoking in the facility. This affected one (#6) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified eight residents who were independent smokers. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #6 revealed an admission dated of 07/19/19. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/20, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan, dated 7/19/19, revealed the resident was at risk for smoking related to disease and illness and/or injury. The smoking assessment was completed and the resident was deemed a safe and independent smoker. Interventions were to observe and report unsafe smoking practices. Review of the smoking assessments, dated 07/19/19 and 09/05/19, revealed he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • MRS FAMILY TRUST — REIT · 14.41% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MRS FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
CROWN OHIO HOLDCO INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/09/2021
FEJCC TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
MDATAS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
SHKOP, BENJAMINIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/20/2018
SINGER, MEIRIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
WEINTRAUB, MOSHEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/20/2018
DAUBENMIRE, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2018
MCGEE, EVELYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
VENKATESH, LATHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 8%Other / private 20%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,578per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365743. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next