New Lebanon Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
101 Mills Place, New Lebanon, OH 45345 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (937) 687-1311 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $96,413 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 45.2% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.6%CMS range 34.7–69.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.5–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, nursing staff schedule review, facility assessment review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of state tested nursing staff and licensed nursing staff to meet the total care needs of all facility residents. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when on 08/26/24 at 7:00 A.M., there were three licensed practical nurses (LPN) and two state tested nurse aides (STNA) on duty to provide for the routine care, monitoring, medication administration, assessments, response to urgent resident needs and/or treatments for all 105 residents residing in the facility. The lack of nursing staff in the facility to provide nursing care and services resulted in actual and/or the potential for serious harm, injuries and/or negative health outcomes for residents related to the lack of care and services, activities of daily living (ADL), supervision of common areas, smoking areas and assistance with meal intake. This had the potential to affect all 105…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) information, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to prevent and timely identify pressure ulcers and injuries for Residents #37, #86, and #4. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or negative health outcomes, when Resident #37 developed six facility acquired deep tissue pressure injuries and was hospitalized for osteomyelitis. Additionally, Resident #86 developed facility acquired unstageable (the base of the wound is covered by dead tissue) pressure ulcers to the coccyx, left heel, and left lateral ankle, and was hospitalized for osteomyelitis. Furthermore, Resident #4 developed facility acquired moisture associated skin damage (MASD), which healed, and was then found to have an unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx. This affected three (#86, #37, and #4) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, store, and distribute food in a safe manner. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents who received food from the facility. The facility census was 96Findings include:1.Observation on 09/22/25 at 8:23 A.M. revealed during the initial tour with the DM #155 revealed a swarm of flying gnats throughout the kitchen areas.Interview on 09/22/25 at 8:25 A.M. confirmed the facility has an ongoing issue with fruit flies and gnats. DM #155 stated she will check to ensure she does not have overripe bananas as she peered over a box of bananas and confirmed that is not the issue to cause the active gnats. DM #155 stated the facility has an ongoing issue with active gnats in the kitchen.2. Observation on 09/23/25 at 3:01 P.M. during the observation of purred and mechanical meal preparation revealed active black flies in the kitchen during meal preparation. Interview on 09/23/25 at 3:02 P.M. with DM #155 confirmed the active flies in the kitchen while the staff prepared the dinner meal. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide medical records to a resident upon his or her request. This affected one (#37) out of one residents reviewed for medical record request. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included candidiasis, multiple sclerosis, obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, essential primary hypertension, anemia, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, asthma, major depressive disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 37 was cognitively intact. Resident #37 was dependent on staff for medication administration. Resident #37 is independent with eating, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. She required assistance with oral hygiene and supervision with toilet use, bathing, and lower body dressing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, family and staff interviews, review of the grievance log, and policy review, the facility failed to complete thorough investigations for complaints of missing items. This affected one (#76) of two residents sampled for missing items. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, type II diabetes, unspecified anxiety disorder, and stage III chronic kidney disease.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #76 had no documented inventory list. Review of facility grievance log dated January 2025 to September 2025 revealed no entries for resident concerns or grievances. Review of handwritten document titled Clothing Inventory dated April 2025, updated May 2025, revealed a list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans. This affected two (#49 and #76) residents out of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 02/04/25 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM), psychotic disorder with delusions, vascular dementia and hypertension (HTN). Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/13/25, which indicated Resident #49 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating, bed mobility, and transfers, and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed a Smoking assessment dated [DATE], which indicated resident #49 was an unsupervised smoker. Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers. This affected three (#76, #37, and #92) of ten residents sampled for bathing assistance. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, type II diabetes, unspecified anxiety disorder, and stage III chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Resident #76 required maximum assistance with bathing. Review of care plan dated 04/01/2025 revealed Resident #76 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included assisting with ADL's as needed. Resident #76 was independent with eating and bed mobility and required two-person assistance with toileting and transfers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities designed to meet resident needs. This affected one (#29) resident of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 08/20/18 with medical diagnoses of major depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, vascular dementia, and right sided spastic hemiplegia. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/11/25, which indicated Resident #29 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #70's indicated it was somewhat important to have books, newspapers, magazines to read, and to listen to music and it was very important to keep up with the news, do things with groups of people and do his favorite activity. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility timeline documentation, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was assessed as being at risk for elopements did not elope from the facility. This affected one (#70) resident out of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date 06/20/25 with medical diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, dementia without behavioral disturbances, and bipolar disorder. The medical record indicated Resident #70 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for behavior issues and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record indicated Resident #70 discharged to another nursing facility on 09/12/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/26/25, indicated Resident #70 had severely impaired cognition and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record. staff interview and review of guidelines from the National Institute of Health, the facility failed to ensure non-rebreather masks were used according to professional standards. This affected one (#108) of one residents sampled for respiratory services. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expire in the facility on 02/27/25. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, stage III kidney disease, and unspecified dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #108 had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behaviors, did not wander, and did not reject care. Review of care plan dated 12/16/2021 revealed Resident #108 had impaired respiratory status. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, change oxygen tubing weekly, monitoring for symptoms of respiratory distress, monitoring vital signs with pulse oximetry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. This affected one (#70) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date 06/20/25 with medical diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, HTN, dementia without behavioral disturbances, and bipolar disorder. The medical record indicated Resident #70 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for behavior issues and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record indicated Resident #70 discharged to another nursing facility on 09/12/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/26/25, indicated Resident #70 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision with bathing, toilet hygiene, and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed physician orders dated 08/08/25 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately. This affected two (#15 and #97) of five residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #15 revealed admission date of 03/15/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including paraplegia, paranoid schizophrenia, depression, encephalopathy, and hypotension. The resident remained at the facility. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. He was independent with eating, dependent upon staff with toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. He was documented to have four stage four pressure areas, two were present on admission. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed there was no physician order, assessment, care plan or other documentation supporting the resident could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a pest free environment. This affected three (#49, #61, and #96) residents out of six residents reviewed for pest control. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, unspecified schizophrenia, and narcolepsy without catatonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behaviors, did not wander, and routinely rejected care. Observation on 09/22/25 at 10:16 A.M. revealed Resident #61 lay in bed in a hospital gown with a sheet covering him. There were two flying insects observed on the the bed sheet, and one flying insect had landed on the privacy curtain. During an interview in 09/22/25 at 10:16 A.M. Activities Director #199 verified Resident #61 had three flying insects flying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure smoking items were properly stored according to policy. This affected two (#49 and #16) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #16 revealed admission date of 07/29/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia right dominant side following stroke, type two diabetes mellitus, dementia without behavior, anxiety, depression and congestive heart failure. The resident remained at the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. He was independent with eating and required moderate assistance from staff with toileting hygiene, bed mobility Observation on 09/22/25 at 10:51 A.M. revealed an unopened pack of cigarettes located on the bedside table during an interview with Resident #16. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of the directive from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local health department of a COVID-19 facility outbreak that began on 11/16/24 and ended on 12/24/24. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the facility infection control log and map confirmed the facility had an outbreak of COVID-19 on 11/16/24 through 12/24/24. Interview on 12/30/24 at 4:51 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility experienced an outbreak of COVID-19 from 11/16/24 though 12/24/24. The Administrator confirmed the facility was not aware of a requirement to contact the local health department and failed to notify the local health department of the outbreak. Review of the directive from CMS titled, QSO-20-39-NH, dated May 08, 2023, revealed facilities are expected to contact their health department when responding to COVID-19 transmission within their facility. Review of the facility policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of hospital documentation, review of Omnicell (automatic medication dispensing cabinet) documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered. This affected one (#97) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 09/13/24 with medication diagnoses of staphylococcal arthritis of left ankle and foot, schizophrenia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/20/24, which indicated Resident #97 had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers and required supervision with bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #97 received antipsychotic and antianxiety medications. Review of the medical record for Resident #97…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected one (#09) out of the two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #09 revealed an admission date of 02/22/23 with medical diagnoses of right above the knee amputation, diabetes mellitus, asthma, schizoaffective disorder, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #09 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/30/24, which indicated Resident #09 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #09 revealed physician orders dated 03/20/24 for Ascorbic acid 500 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth two times per day, multivitamin one tablet by mouth two times per day, senna 8.6-50 mg one tablet by mouth two times per day, loratadine 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, observations, and pest control invoices, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free from flies and gnats. This affected two (#11 and #13) out of the three reviewed for environment. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/26/23 with medical diagnoses of cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, mood disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/01/24, which indicated Resident #11 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident 311 was always incontinent of bladder, frequently incontinent of bowel, and refused care at times. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/11/23 with medical diagnoses of emphysema, cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus, vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) sign-in sheets, and staff interview, the facility failed to be administered in a manner to ensure proper care and services for residents. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility. The census was 105. Findings include: During the annual, extended survey, and complaint survey, many area of deficient practice were identified under resident quality of life and quality of care area. Those areas included providing residents with activities of daily living assistance, providing wound care, assisting residents with range of motion needs, preventing accidents and hazards, providing catheter care, obtaining resident weights to address nutritional needs, care of a gastrostomy tube, and treatment pressure ulcers which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Additionally, the facility was identified deficient in the area of sufficient staffing which also resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Review of the QAPI sign-in sheets for 08/14/23, 12/04/23, 02/12/24, and 06/10/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) sign-in sheets, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective governing body to oversee the functions of the facility. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents in the facility. The census was 105. Findings include: Review of the QAPI sign-in sheets for 08/14/23, 12/04/23, 02/12/24, and 06/10/24 revealed multiple people in the role of Director of Nursing (DON). The sheets also lacked information regarding the governing body's involvement with the QAPI meetings. Review of a list provided by the facility revealed there had been four individuals in the DON position since 09/21/23. Interview on 08/29/24 at 11:25 A.M. via telephone with Physician #232 verified there had been significant turnover in nursing management at the facility. Interview on 08/29/24 at 3:15 P.M. with [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) #242 revealed the information he was learning regarding staffing levels at the facility had given him great pause and concern. Interview on 08/29/24 at 3:27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility assessment review and staff interview, the facility failed to include staffing needs for each resident unit within the facility and time frames for adjustments as necessary with changes in the resident population. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment dated 2023 and 2024 revealed an initial approval signature page with three signatures on it. The signatures included the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Medical Director with a date of 05/31/24. Review of the Letter B of the facility assessment addressed staffing and staffing assignments. Further review revealed staffing would be determined using various reports to analyze the number of patients, velocity of expected admission and discharges, diagnoses and the total number and types of tasks and services required of nursing, nursing assistants and ancillary personnel. The facility assessment did not address the staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and adequate oversight by the Medical Director. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility. The census was 105. Findings include: Review of the facility documentation revealed no evidence of the Medical Director's participation in addressing identified concerns and overall coordination of resident care and services. Interview on 08/29/24 at 11:25 A.M. via telephone with Physician #232 revealed he was unaware of the severity of identified concerns despite being a member of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee. Physician #232 stated he had not always provided the facility with his completed documentation related to resident visits. Review of the facility policy titled, Medical Director, dated 09/2021, revealed the Medical Director should be meeting periodically with nursing and other professional staff to discuss clinical and administrative issues, care problems, and offering solutions to problems.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to make good faith attempts to correct identified concerns with appropriate oversight from leadership as part of their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility. The census was 105. Findings include: During the annual, extended survey, and complaint survey, many area of deficient practice were identified under resident quality of life and quality of care area. Those areas included providing residents with activities of daily living assistance, providing wound care, assisting residents with range of motion needs, preventing accidents and hazards, providing catheter care, obtaining resident weights to address nutritional needs, care of a gastrostomy tube, and treatment pressure ulcers which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Additionally, the facility was identified deficient in the area of sufficient staffing which also resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Review of the facility QAPI program revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control precautions related to handling soiled linens, providing care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions, and providing meals and eating assistance with proper hand hygiene. This had the potential to affected all 105 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/29/24 at 7:15 A.M. of the facility laundry room revealed Laundry Staff #176 was on the side of the room designated for sorting dirty laundry from the units. Laundry Staff #176 was sorting linens from a large plastic laundry bin with dark brown stains on them. Laundry Staff #176 was wearing a cotton uniform jacket over her uniform with gloves and no goggles. Interview on 08/29/24 at 7:20 A.M. with Laundry Staff #176 verified she was not wearing the approved personal protective equipment (PPE) when she should have been. Laundry Staff #176 verified a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate resident-to-resident altercations. This affected six (Residents #69, #72, #74, #79, #91, and #152) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 01/03/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, acute kidney failure, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, insomnia, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was rarely/never understood and had impaired cognitive skills. Resident #69 was assessed to require set-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for oral hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) received care and services in a timely manner. This affected four (Residents #4, #6, #41 and #50) of four residents reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, hemiplegia on right and left side, epilepsy, respiratory failure, coma, persistent vegetative state, acute cystitis without hematuria, hypertension, anxiety disorder, tracheostomy status and gastrostomy status. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #41 revealed resident was in a persistent coma state and was dependent for all care. The resident had a gastrostomy tube and received 51 percent of calories through parenteral feedings, had a tracheostomy in place and received oxygen via compressor at 20 pounds per square…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility to ensure residents did not have their smoking equipment in their rooms. This affected three (Residents #51, #68 and #77) residents. The facility identified 47 residents who used tobacco products. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 08/31/23 with diagnoses of emphysema, unspecified and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 with moderate cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 07/24/24 for oxygen two liters via nasal cannula as needed to maintain oxygen saturations greater than 90 percent. Review of Other Smoking Evaluation dated 08/19/24 revealed Resident #51 is able to be an unsupervised smoker. Review of the care plan for smoking, revised 08/19/24, revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy. This affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/23. Diagnoses included cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, mid-cervical region, contracture, right hip, contracture, left hip, contracture, right knee, and contracture, left knee. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. She was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and wheelchair mobility. Review of the Care Plan dated 01/17/24 revealed Resident #5 has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit with interventions of assist with activities of daily living (i.e.: dressing, grooming, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach. This affected one (Resident #15) of four residents reviewed for accommodations of needs. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #15 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, type 2 diabetes with polyneuropathy, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had impaired cognition. Resident #15 had no impairments for bilateral upper extremities. Resident #15 required supervision for eating, total staff dependence for toileting and transfers, maximal assistance for bed mobility. Review of the plan of care for Resident #15 dated 05/15/24 revealed the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions include assist with activities of daily living (dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #87) one resident reviewed for notification. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 05/13/24. Diagnoses included acute transverse myelitis in demyelinating disease of central nervous system and major depressive disorder. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact. Resident was independent for eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. Resident required partial assistance with toileting hygiene, transfers, and ambulating 10 feet. Resident required substantial assistance with bathing and dressing. Review of progress notes revealed no documentation of Resident #87 leaving the facility and being transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit a resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge a resident from the facility without the proper documentation. This affected one (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #100's chart revealed Resident #100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, paresthesia of skin, radiculopathy, major depressive disorder and other specified arthritis. Resident #100 was discharged from the facility on 05/22/24. Review of Resident #100's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #100 required set up with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #100 required supervision with showering, upper body dressing, and moderate assistance with lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification to a resident of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move to a resident that was discharged to a homeless shelter. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #100's chart revealed Resident #100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, paresthesia of skin, radiculopathy, major depressive disorder and other specified arthritis. Resident #100 was discharged from the facility on 05/22/24. Review of Resident #100's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #100 required set up with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #100 required supervision with showering, upper body dressing, and moderate assistance with lower body dressing, putting on and taking off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed sufficiently prepare and orient a resident to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #100's chart revealed Resident #100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, paresthesia of skin, radiculopathy, major depressive disorder and other specified arthritis. Resident #100 was discharged from the facility on 05/22/24. Review of Resident #100's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #100 required set up with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #100 required supervision with showering, upper body dressing, and moderate assistance with lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, sitting to standing, chair transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately. This affected three (Residents #41, #62, and #77) of twelve residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, hemiplegia or right and left sides, epilepsy, respiratory failure, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, persistent vegetative state, acute cystitis without hematuria, hypertension, anxiety disorder, tracheostomy status, encephalopathy, and gastrostomy. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #41 revealed an ordered dated 03/20/24 for nothing by mouth (NPO), an order dated 03/21/24 for tube feeding, Jevity 1.5- 60 milliliters/hour (ml/hr) until 1320 ml has infused, allow two hours off for nursing care. Review of the annual MDS assessment for Resident #41 dated 08/15/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed notify the state mental health authority with a significant change pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for residents with a change in their mental health or physical condition. This affected two (Residents #04 and #79) of five resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #04's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/22. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere severe with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, other seizures, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, cerebral palsy, schizoaffective disorder, depression, insomnia, age related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #04's PASARR dated 08/31/22 revealed Resident #04 had no indications of serious mental illness. There were no diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for residents. This affected three (Residents #04, #62, #77) of twelve residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 11/09/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, and bipolar disorder. Review of the care plan dated 03/10/24 revealed resident is at risk for altered nutritional / hydration status related to history of mouth sores with interventions of refer to ancillary services i.e. dental, vision etc. as needed. Further review of the care plan revealed no documentation related to resident has multiple dental cavities. During an interview on 08/19/24 at 2:20 P.M., Resident #62 stated he was to be referred to an oral surgeon quite a while agodue to cavities to left posterior teeth. The resident complaint of tooth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to revise the plans of care timely and failed to conduct care conferences as required. This affected three (Residents #46, #77, and #92) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1a. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 03/01/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), epilepsy, and paraplegia. Review of the five-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/02/24, revealed Resident #46 was not able to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because he was rarely/never understood. The resident required supervision with eating, dependent with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Resident #46 had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan dated 08/25/23 revealed Resident #46 had a need for suprapubic catheter related to neurogenic bladder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had an order for a dressing change and failed to change the dressing as ordered; failed to ensure transportation was provided to appointments; and failed to timely address a change in condition. This affected three (Residents #86, #87 and #303) residents. Seven residents were reviewed for wound care, and two residents were reviewed for transportation and changes in condition. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1a. Record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of tibia or fibula following insertion of orthopedic implant, joint prosthesis, or bone plate, right leg and paraplegia. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated, 05/24/24 revealed Resident #86 was cognitively intact. Resident #86 had an order for a follow up appointment on 08/15/24 at 9:30 A.M. at [NAME] Health [NAME] Wound Care. Review of the nursing note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided appropriately. This affected one (Resident #46) of two residents reviewed for urinary concerns. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 03/01/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), epilepsy, and paraplegia. Review of the Five-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/02/24, revealed Resident #46 was not able to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because he was rarely/never understood. Resident #46 was dependent with toileting. Resident #46 had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan, dated 08/25/23, revealed Resident #46 had a need for a catheter related to neurogenic bladder. Interventions included enhanced barrier precautions for indwelling catheter. Staff monitor for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections including blood in urine, cloudiness, foul smell,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician approved admission to the facility in writing. This affected three (Residents #58, #85, and #92) out of five residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, severe intellectual disabilities, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, autistic disorder, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, constipation, hypothyroidism, vitamin d deficiency, drug induced akathisia, insomnia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and restlessness and agitation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #58 was assessed to require set-up assistance for eating, oral hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, supervision for bathing, and was independent for toileting, bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure medically related social services was provided to a resident discharging from the facility. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #100's chart revealed Resident #100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, paresthesia of skin, radiculopathy, major depressive disorder and other specified arthritis. Resident #100 was discharged from the facility on 05/22/24. Review of Resident #100's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #100 required set up with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #100 required supervision with showering, upper body dressing, and moderate assistance with lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, sitting to standing, chair transfers, toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained per physician orders. This affected two (Residents #16 and #77) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/23/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to syncope and collapse, cognitive communication deficit, dementia severe with other behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, paranoid personality, insomnia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension and anxiety. Review of the plan of care for Resident #16 dated 03/18/22 revealed the resident had an impaired neurological status related to dementia. Interventions include administer medications as ordered, monitor and report to physician of declines in cognitive functioning, orientation, changes in communication, and monitor laboratory and diagnostic testing per physician orders. Review of the active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to schedule an oral surgeon appointment timely for one (Resident #62) of one resident reviewed for dental concerns. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 11/09/22 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact, had impairment to bilateral upper and lower extremities, and required set-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and wheelchair mobility. Review of the care plan dated 03/10/24 revealed Resident #62 was at risk for altered nutritional/hydration status related to therapeutic diet and history of mouth sores with intervention of refer to ancillary services, i.e. dental. Review of Resident #62's dental health service post-visit note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received drinks of their preference and request in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #13) of 25 residents residing in the memory care unit. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 02/18/20 with diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia, protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), alcohol abuse, tachycardia, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 revealed the resident was assessed with impaired cognition. Resident #13 required set up for eating, and supervision for toileting, transfers, and bed mobility, Resident #13 was on a mechanically altered diet with thin liquids. Review of the plan of care for Resident #13 dated 04/15/22, and revised on 08/19/24, revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutritional status/dehydration related to diagnosis of COPD, dementia, depression, consumed less than 75 percent (%)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete and accurately documented. This affected one (Resident #87) one resident reviewed for notification. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 05/13/24 with diagnoses of acute transverse myelitis in demyelinating disease of central nervous system and major depressive disorder. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact. Resident #87 was assessed as independent for eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. Resident #87 required partial assistance with toileting hygiene, transfers, and ambulating 10 feet, and required substantial assistance with bathing and dressing. Review of Resident #87's physician orders revealed no documentation that the resident was ordered to be sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #87's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received pneumococcal vaccinations as ordered. This affected two (Residents #38 and #71) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 08/03/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia, type two diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and Charcot's joint. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. The resident was assessed as dependent with eating, toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the facility's vaccine informed consent form for Resident #38 dated 11/21/23 at 7:17 A.M. revealed the resident was offered and accepted pneumococcal vaccinations of Pneumococcal 15-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV-15) PVC-20, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment. This affected one (Resident #76) out of one resident reviewed for environment. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 03/03/23. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, paranoid schizophrenia, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 was cognitively intact. Resident #76 was assessed to require set-up assistance for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfer. Interview on 08/29/24 at 10:00 A.M. with the Administrator revealed Resident #76 fell while engaging in an activity outside the facility. The Administrator stated there was an uncovered pipe in the grassy area near the facility's sign. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of pest control visit documentation, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an environment which was free from pests. This affected two (Residents #4 and #5) of two reviewed for environment. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/23 with diagnoses of cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, mid-cervical region and contractures of bilateral hips and knees. Review of the Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, and was dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and wheelchair mobility. Review the care plan dated 01/17/24 revealed Resident #5 required a two-person assistance with bed mobility. Observation on 08/19/24 at 2:03 P.M. revealed Resident #5 lying in bed with multiple flies flying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff, resident and resident representative interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a resident, that had an order for supervised Leave of Absence (LOA), did not leave the facility unsupervised. This affected one (#06) out of three reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #06 revealed an admission date of 12/30/20 with medical diagnoses of epilepsy, right sided hemiplegia due to cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #06 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/19/24, which indicated Resident #06 had moderate cognitive impairment and required set-up assistance with eating, wheelchair mobility, and bed mobility, partial staff assistance with transfers and supervision with toilet hygiene, and bathing. The MDS did not indicate Resident #06 had any wandering behaviors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented assistance and/or supervision with meals in accordance with a resident's care plan. This affected one (#20) out of three residents reviewed for assistance with feeding. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/20/18 with diagnoses of vascular dementia, anxiety, spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 requires set-up assistance with eating. Resident #20 was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, and wheelchair mobility. Resident #20 has coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications and has complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing and is on a mechanically altered diet of pureed food and thickened liquids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident beds were working properly. This affected three (#14, #15 and #16) of four residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident # 14 revealed admission date of 02/21/22. Diagnoses include cardiomegaly. The resident remains in the facility. Review of medical record for Resident #15 revealed admission date of 1/23/24. Diagnoses include dementia with behaviors. The resident remains in the facility. Review of medical record for Resident #16 revealed admission date of 12/13/21. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure. The resident remains in the facility. Interview on 02/28/24 at 10:02 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #102 revealed Resident #14's bed had not been working properly. STNA #102 stated the facility was aware the beds had been of concern. Observation revealed when STNA #102 pressed the head control button, the bed worked as it should. When STNA #102…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound dressings were changed in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected two (#56 and #36) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified thoracic thoracolumbar and lumbosacral intervertebral disc disorder, cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, unspecified cervical region, dorsalgia, unspecified, and osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumbar region. with diagnoses of Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 12/16/23 revealed Resident #36 had impaired skin integrity. Interventions included Resident #36 will comply with recommendations/treatments to minimize further skin impairment, will show signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/06/21. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, venous insufficiency, morbid obesity, chronic venous hypertension with inflammation of bilateral lower extremity, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, protein-calorie malnutrition, hypotension, cardiomegaly, secondary hyperparathyroidism of renal origin, heart failure, hypothyroidism, and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/04/22, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. This resident was assessed to require limited assistance for transfer and toileting as well as supervision for bed mobility, dressing, and eating. Review of the nursing progress note dated 06/06/22 revealed Resident #10 was transported to the hospital from dialysis for evaluation. There was no evidence of notification to the Ombudsman. 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure baseline plan of care was completed within 48 hours of admission and failed to provide the baseline plan of care to a resident. This affected four (#225, #28, #285, #10) out of four residents reviewed for baseline plan of care. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #225 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, malnutrition, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, and dependence on oxygen. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was noted in progress for Resident #225. Further record review for Resident #225 revealed there was no evidence of a baseline plan of care. Review of the dietary plan of care dated 10/06/22 for Resident #225 revealed resident is at risk for altered nutritional status and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to secure the maintenance room which contained multiple hazardous items. This had the potential to affect 23 (#18, #15, #11, #286, #42, #279, #3, #20, #38, #26, #25, #44, #65, #27, #34, #9, #50, #276, #12, #4, #63, #64 and #44) residents the facility identified as confused and independently mobile that could access the unlocked/unsecured area. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and adult personality disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #50 revealed a severely impaired cognition. Resident #50 requires extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care for Resident #50 dated [DATE] and revised on [DATE] revealed resident has behaviors related to physically aggressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and review of a daily cleaning list, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was kept sanitary. This had the potential to affect all resident receiving food from the facility kitchen, except four residents (#19, #229, #278, #14) that did not receive food prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/04/22 at 11:35 A.M. of the facility kitchen steam table (a table having openings to hold containers of cooked food over steam circulating beneath them) revealed accumulation of brown unknown material located at each of the forward screws connected the self above the steam table to the actual steam table unit. Additionally, on both sides of the steam table there was white and brown streaks from unknown spillage streaking down to the floor. 2. Observation on 10/04/22 at 11:35 A.M. of the metal side table in the facility kitchen revealed multiple streaks of unknown material from the top to the bottom of the unit that was used for food service. 3. Observation on 10/04/22 at 11:35 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to issue bed hold notices to residents. This affected three (#21, #50, and #73) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization. Facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/21. Diagnoses listed included moderate intellectual disabilities, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Further review of Resident #50's medical record revealed he was discharged to a hospital on [DATE], 07/20/22, and 08/03/22. No documentation of a bed hold notice being given to Resident #50 on 03/09/22, 07/20/22, and 08/03/22 was found. 2. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/03/22. Diagnoses listed included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, psychotic disturbance, and schizophrenia. Further review of Resident #73's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was accurate. This affected one (#73) of two reviewed for PASARR. The census was 84. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/03/22. Diagnoses listed included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, psychotic disturbance, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #73's PASARR dated 07/29/22 revealed in section D the box was check no for a diagnosis of dementia and in section E part one the box was checked no for any of the mental disorders listed. Resident #73 was assessed as not having a serious mental illness. However, further medical record review for Resident #73 revealed there were diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, psychotic disturbance, and schizophrenia. During an interview on 10/05/22 at 10:45 A.M. Social Services (SS) #86 confirmed that Resident #73's PASARR dated 07/29/22 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly groomed. This affected two (#19 and #50) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's) in the sample. The census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/21. Diagnoses listed included moderate intellectual disabilities, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was moderately cognitively impaired and required limited assistance for personal hygiene and total dependence for bathing. Review of admission paperwork dated 12/27/21 revealed podiatry services had been accepted for Resident #50. Further review of Resident #50's medical record revealed no documentation of any podiatry services since admission. Observation of Resident #50 on 10/03/22 at 10:01 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident had privacy curtains. This affect two (#21, #22) out of two residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/03/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to stroke, cellulitis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteoarthritis, respiratory failure, kidney failure and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #22 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #22 required extensive assistant with bed mobility, total assist for transfers and toileting and supervision for eating. Review of the plan of care for Resident #22 dated 10/06/22 reveals resident has behaviors related to masturbation with the door open, curtains open and is openly exposed to the hallway. Observation on 10/04/22 11:19 A.M. of Resident #22 revealed only one curtain between the beds that was not long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a functioning call light. This affected one (#72) out of eight residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 12/13/21. Diagnoses included anemia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, thrombocytosis, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, wedge compression fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra, hypertension, congestive heart failure, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/13/22, revealed this resident had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of 15. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene as well as supervision for eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-18 · tag F0712 — widespreadEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by the physician upon admission. This affected three (Resident #58, #87 and #92) of three reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #87 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute transverse myelitis in demyelinating disease of central nervous system and major depressive disorder. Review of the Establishment and Stabilization note, dated 05/14/24, revealed Resident #87 was seen by Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #218 on 05/14/24. Review of the the physician progress notes revealed Resident #87 had not been seen by a physician or the medical director since admission on [DATE]. During an interview 08/29/24 at 2:29 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #50 confirmed there was no documentation present in Resident #87's medical record that he was seen by the physician since admission to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Review of the medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to post nurse staffing information in a clear visible place. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census is 105. Findings include: During an observation on 08/26/24 at 8:30 A.M., no staffing information was found identifying the current nursing staff. During an interview on 08/26/24 at 8:41 A.M., the Administrator verified the required posted nurse staffing information was not available for accessible to visitors or residents. During an interview on 08.26.24 at 8:42 A.M., Facility Scheduling Coordinator (FSC) #78 verified the absence of posted nurse staffing information. She stated she was unaware of the requirements and has not posted the information for three weeks since taking the scheduling position. Review of the facility policy titled Staff, daily Posting, dated September 2021 revealed the facility will post daily for each shift the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. Number one of the policy states the information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$96,413 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $96,413 — penalty dated 2024-09-18
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-17 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROWN OHIO HOLDCO II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2021 |
| CROWN OHIO HOLDCO III LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/21/2025 |
| DAUBENMIRE, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 12/31/2022 |
| ELKINS WAY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2022 |
| FERGUSON, HAROLD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| MASON, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/06/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $701K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365897. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.