Swanton Valley Rehabilitation And Healthcare Cente
401 W Airport Hwy, Swanton, OH 43558 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 92 certified beds · (419) 825-1111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $18,880 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 58.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 38.4–61.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.4–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 18.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.3–14.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 77.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the facility policy, review of documentation on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website, and review of Public Safety Network guidance, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible when one resident (#11) continued to use vape pens (an electronic device that uses a battery to heat up a special liquid into an aerosol that users inhale) in the presence of oxygen. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious physical harm and/or injuries, when Resident #11 was allowed to keep her vape pen in her room and was known to use it while wearing her oxygen, which increased the risk of potentially causing the oxygen gas to ignite from the heat of the vape pen. This affected one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for using vape pens. Additionally, facility staff failed to follow the facility's policy for residents to return their vape pens to staff when not in use, and not to vape unless in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff members maintained proper infection control measures by wearing appropriate personal protective equipment when providing direct care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions. This affected two (#5 and #8) of two residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 73.Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/07/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of corpus uteri, chronic osteomyelitis, displacement of an indwelling urethral stent, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling ureteral stent, sacral and sacrococcygeal osteomyelitis of the vertebra, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase resistance, type II diabetes mellitus, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of sacral region, stage three chronic kidney disease, retention of urine, and overactive bladder.Review of the most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/16/26, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented and thorough post-fall investigations were conducted. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for fall prevention in a facility census of 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the upper right lobe lung and bronchus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, pneumonia, bacteremia, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, generalized anxiety, major depression, shortness of breath and chronic fatigue. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #2 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, required supervision/touching assistance with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to address bladder incontinence and ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence in a facility census of 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included post-polio syndrome, Bell's palsy, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and bilateral myopia. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was assessed with intact cognition, rejected care four to six days during the seven day look back period, had bilateral upper and lower extremity range of motion impairments, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin impairment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure dishes were cleaned and properly stored. This had the potential to affect 75 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#52) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Observation on 12/02/24 at 8:12 A.M. of the kitchen revealed no designated storage area for clean cups, bowls, plates or trays. The clean clear bowls and adaptive equipment were stored on a rack in the dish room, cups were stored on the drink carts, trays were stored at the end of the steam table and opaque soup bowls were stored in racks under the steam oven. Observation on 12/03/24 at 9:58 A.M. of three coffee cups from 200 hall drink cart revealed a dried powdery residue coating on the inside of the cup. The residue could be easily removed by rubbing a finger across the coating. Coinciding interview with the Administrator verified the cups appeared unclean. Observation on 12/03/24 at 11:18 A.M. of the kitchenware storage rack in the dishwashing room revealed two plates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure room temperatures were comfortable for the residents. This affected four residents (#57, #19, #34 and #71) of four residents reviewed for comfortable room temperatures. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/02/24, revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Observation on 12/02/24 at 8:35 A.M. revealed Resident #57 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The resident was wearing long sweatpants and a sweatshirt and had a blanket covering her. Concurrent interview with Resident # 57 revealed the she was cold. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 05/05/24 with diagnoses of COPD and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received a dignified assisted dining experience. This affected one (#30) of three residents observed for staff assistance with eating. The facility identified 12 additional residents (#4, #6, #21, #35, #37, #39, #42, #45, #49, #50, #58, and #64) who required staff assistance with eating. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 02/07/24 with diagnoses of heart failure, dementia and lack of coordination. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/24, revealed Resident #30 had severely impaired cognition. Further review revealed Resident #30 required partial/moderate staff assistance with eating. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident #30 had an activities of daily life (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions included one person assistance with eating. Observation on 12/02/24 at 12:11 P.M. during meal service in the main dining room revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the medical record, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) exercises were provided to prevent further decline. This affected one (#46) of two residents reviewed for ROM. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/28/22. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, cerebrovascular infarction (stroke) affecting left side resulting in hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, neuropathy, anxiety disorder, hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/06/24, revealed Resident #46 had moderately impaired cognition, had no refusals of treatment, had ROM impairment to one side upper and lower extremity and required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the plan of care, revised 04/07/22, revealed Resident #46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders. This affected three (#34, #57 and #5) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility identified 10 residents who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 04/23/24 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #34 was ordered oxygen at fours liter per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (NC). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/28/24, revealed Resident #34 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident #34 had impaired respiratory status. Interventions included oxygen per physician orders. Observation on 12/02/24 at 9:16 A.M. of Resident #34 revealed her oxygen was applied and the oxygen concentrator was set at three lpm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine dental services. This affected one (#40) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/01/23. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, restlessness and agitation and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/25/24, revealed Resident #40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #40 required supervision with eating, and moderate assistance with oral hygiene. Resident #40 required a mechanically altered diet and had no broken or loosely fitting dentures, no mouth or facial pain and had no discomfort or difficulty with chewing at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment to support resident's independence was provided during meals. This affected one (#40) of six residents reviewed for dining. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/01/23. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, restlessness and agitation and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/25/24, revealed Resident #40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #40 required supervision with eating and had no discomfort or difficulty with chewing at the time of the review. Review of the care plan, initiated 12/09/22, revealed Resident #40 was at risk for altered nutritional status related to dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of changes of condition requiring as needed intramuscular injection for behavior. This affected one resident (#100) of one resident reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 08/07/24. Resident #100 was admitted with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, dementia with behavioral disturbance, delirium, restlessness, and agitation. Review of the physician orders for 07/24 for Resident #100 revealed he was ordered geodon (used for agitation) 10 milligram (mg) intramuscular (IM) as needed (PRN), and Zyprexa (used for agitation) 10 mg IM PRN. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 07/24 for Resident #100 revealed he was administered Zyprexa 10 mg IM on 07/04/24 at 5:35 P.M. for agitation and Geodon 10 mg IM on 07/22/24 at 8:59 P.M. and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff schedule review, staff interview, review of the facility assessment the facility failed to maintain the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents currently residing in the facility. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the nursing staff information and staff schedule from 01/29/24 to 02/04/24 revealed no registered nurses (RN) were present working in the facility on 02/03/24 and 02/04/24. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] stated staffing and staff assignments are determined by the Nursing Administration and Administrative leadership utilizing various reports to analyze the number of patients, velocity of expected admissions and discharges, diagnosis, the total number and type of tasks and services required of nursing, nursing assistants, and other ancillary personnel. Staff assignments are driven by the burden of care, patient location, and acuity.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of cleaning list, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen, ensure all food items were dated when opened and contained used by dates. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation during the tour of the kitchen on 02/05/24 between 8:27 A.M. and 9:00 A.M., of the kitchen revealed a buildup of a black substance on around the baseboards of the kitchen, a dirty microwave with a variety of dried color splatter, dried patterns of dried substances on a variety of metal shelving, including a dried white splatter on the cart containing boxes of foil and plastic wraps and an air conditioner in the window next to the grill top with brown/yellow colored debris. Refrigerator with unlabeled and undated bowls (three) of a brown substance, 2 gallons of chocolate milk without open dates, and in the dry storage room revealed an onion on the floor below a wheeled cart that contained a pan of uncovered, undated cornbread.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, testing log review, staff interview, review of material data sheet for disinfectant, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices when cleaning a resident's room in isolation precautions for Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff) infection; utilize proper hand hygiene; and failed to ensure water monitoring for Legionella was completed. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, pulmonary hypertension, lymphedema, hypertension, anxiety disorder, depression, insomnia. Resident #16 tested positive for C-diff on 01/27/24. Review of the care plan for Resident #16 revealed the resident had a C-diff infection and required contact isolation precautions with a goal for Resident #16 to have no complications related to the C-diff infection.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected four (#14, #23, #62 and #241) of twenty-one residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #241 revealed an admission date of 01/18/24, diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, oropharyngeal dysphagia, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, depression, and COVID-19 upon admission. Review of the physician order dated 01/19/24 and timed 1:54 P.M., revealed Resident #241 was ordered a regular diet, pureed with nectar thickened liquids. Review of the care plan dated 01/19/24 identified Resident #241 had an activities of daily living self-care deficit, interventions included one person assist for eating. Resident #241 was also identified as having a dental problem related to missing teeth with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide an Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). This affected one (#188) of three residents reviewed for timely NOMNC's. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #188 revealed an admission date of 03/16/23 and a readmission date of 12/12/23 and a discharge date of 01/04/24. Resident #188 discharged home with family. Review of the beneficiary notice worksheet provided by the facility during the annual survey revealed Resident #188 was discharged from skilled therapy services while using her Medicare Part A benefit on 01/03/24. Review of the notice provided to Resident #188 upon discontinuation of skilled services revealed the NOMNC notice was provided on 01/02/24. Interview on 02/08/24 at 8:01 A.M., with Director of Social Services #283 verified the NOMNC was not given to Resident #188, 48 hours before the end of coverage. DSS #283 stated the notice should have been given 48 hours before the end of coverage, but was not provided 48 hours ahead of time because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to update resident care plans in a timely manner to reflect the resident's current needs. This affected two (#14 and #44) of 21 residents reviewed for accuracy of the care plan. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 84. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, sciatica, and transient ischemia accident (TIA). Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no broken or loose-fitting teeth. Review of Resident #44's most recent care plan revealed she was at risk for a dental problem related to age. The plan was silent to being edematous and only having top dentures. Review of Resident #44's dietary notes dated 08/22/23 through 02/01/24 the dietician failed to refer to the fact that the resident was edematous.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of fall investigations, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to facility failed to complete a thorough root cause analysis into why a resident continued to fall. In addition, the facility failed to implement effective fall interventions to prevent falls. This affected two (#62 and #65) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 09/29/22 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, dementia, hypertension, right femur fracture (10/09/23) and left femur fracture (11/08/23). Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had impaired cognition and ambulated with a wheelchair. Resident #62 required substantial/maximal assistance when transferring from sitting to standing and from the chair to bed and to the toilet. Ambulation was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. Resident #62…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of policy the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for oxygen therapy. This affected three residents (#23, #29 and #65) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 84. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 01/25/23, diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypothyroidism, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was cognitively intact and required the use of oxygen therapy. Review of the care plan dated 01/26/23 revealed Resident #65 had an impaired respiratory status related to tobacco use and oxygen use. Interventions included administration of medications as ordered, assistance with activities of daily living as needed to reduce anxiety and respiratory fatigue, for resident to notify staff if having difficulty with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered per prescribed parameters. This affected one (#48) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 07/28/22 with a diagnosis of hypertension. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had impaired cognition. Review of a current physician order dated 08/15/23 revealed Resident #48 was prescribed Lisinopril oral tablet, 10 milligrams (mg) one daily for hypertension. The medication should be held for a blood pressure (BP) less than 130. Review of the November 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #48's blood pressure was documented at the time of the Lisinopril dose. Review of the MAR dated November 2023 revealed Resident #48's received Lisinopril ten times when his BP was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of policy, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted for the use of psychotropic medications. This affected one (#54) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 03/28/22, diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting non dominant left side, mood affective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, suicidal ideation, visual hallucinations, nicotine dependence, and a history of cocaine dependence. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behavioral symptoms, had a psychiatric/mood disorders that included anxiety and depression, and was taking an antidepressant and had no gradual reduction attempted. Review of the care plan dated 03/29/22 revealed Resident #54 had impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and appropriate to meet resident's needs and according to their assessment, physician order, and care plan. This affected two (#45 and #241) of two residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #241 revealed an admission date of 01/18/24, diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, oropharyngeal dysphagia, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and depression. Resident #241 also had COVID-19 upon admission. Review of the care plan dated 01/19/24 identified Resident #241 had an activities of daily living self-care deficit, interventions included one person assist for eating. Resident #241 was also identified as having a dental problem related to missing teeth with interventions in place for staff to provide assistance as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a shower list, the facility failed to offer alternatives to meet a resident's preference for bathing. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, right pubis fracture, asthma, dysphagia, hypertension, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, aggressive periodontitis, secondary hyperparathyroidism of renal origin, neurofibromatosis, rhabdomyolysis, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was assessed with intact cognition, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living (ADLs), was occasionally incontinent of urine, continent of bowel, had no skin breakdown, and received dialysis. Review of a nursing plan of care dated 08/21/23 addressed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted the right to refuse showers. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 07/31/22. Diagnoses included muscle wasting, osteoarthritis, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #1 required physical help in part of the bathing activity. Resident #1 displayed no behaviors at the time of the review. Review of Resident #1's care plan revised 07/21/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a physical restraint was not used as a behaviorial intervention without a physician order, prior assessment, or care plan support. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/02/22 and a readmission date of 01/23/23. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, multiple myeloma, anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating Resident #3 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #3 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #3 displayed no behaviors at the time of the review. Review of Resident #3's care plan revised 09/02/23 revealed supports and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent as evidenced by two medication errors out of 28 opportunities observed, resulting in a 7.14 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents observed for medication administration. The census was 80. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/10/22 with a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Review of Resident #7's most current physician orders for September 2023 revealed carvedilol 3.125 Milligrams (mg) used for high blood pressure and cetirizine 5 mg used for allergies. Observation on 09/05/23 at 7:52 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #162 providing medication administration to Resident #7 revealed LPN #162 pulled and administered carvedilol 6.25 mg and cetirizine 10 mg (double doses of both medications). Interview on 09/05/23 at 12:27 P.M. with LPN #162 verified Resident #7 was ordered carvedilol 3.125 mg and LPN #162 administered carvedilol 6.25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents observed for medication administration. The census was 80. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/10/22 with a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Review of Resident #7's most current physician orders for September 2023 revealed carvedilol (heart medication) 3.125 Milligrams (mg) used for high blood pressure. Observation on 09/05/23 at 7:52 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #162 providing medication administration to Resident #7 revealed LPN #162 pulled and administered carvedilol 6.25 mg (double the amount ordered). Interview on 09/05/23 at 12:27 P.M. with LPN #162 verified Resident #7 was ordered carvedilol 3.125 mg and LPN #162 administered carvedilol 6.25 mg. Review of facility policy titled, Administering Medications, undated, revealed medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff observation, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control guidelines and all required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) had been utilized during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to prevent transmission of the virus. The county positive rate was listed as high. The practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #222's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/28/21. Diagnoses included COVID-19, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. Review of Resident #222's COVID-19 test dated 09/24/21 revealed the resident tested positive for COVID-19. Observation on 10/04/21 at 12:06 P.M. revealed Resident #222 was in an isolation room. There was no signage observed outside of the resident's room indicating the resident was under isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible to residents. This affected one (#53) resident reviewed for call lights. In addition, the facility failed to have the dining room available for dining service. This affected three (#26, #219, and #223) residents reviewed for dining services. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/22/18 and a readmission date of 01/06/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and spinal stenosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was mildly cognitively impaired. Observation on 10/04/21 at 11:16 A.M. of Resident #53 revealed the Resident was sitting in her recliner, which was positioned approximately halfway down the wall. To the left of the recliner was a table and the Resident's bed was on the other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure signs detailing resident care needs were visible from the hall. This affected one (Resident #24) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively impaired. Further review revealed Resident #24 required extensive one person physical assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care revised 10/05/21 revealed Resident #24 required assistance or was dependent for staff with activities of daily living (ADL) care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, and toileting. Interventions included one person physical assistance with oral/dental care. Observation on 10/04/21 10:10 A.M. of Resident #24's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/15 and a readmission date of 01/13/21. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, type two diabetes, and major depression. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #5's inventory list dated 05/27/21 revealed Resident #5 had four cameras noted on his inventory list. Review of the facility's Self Reported Incidents (SRIs) revealed no incident was reported for the missing camera and camera accessories. Review of Resident #5's progress notes revealed no documented report of Resident #5's missing a camera. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/15 and a readmission date of 01/13/21. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, type two diabetes, and major depression. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #5's inventory list dated 05/27/21 revealed Resident #5 had four cameras noted on his inventory list. Review of the facility's Self Reported Incidents (SRIs) revealed no incident was reported for the missing camera and camera accessories. Review of Resident #5's progress notes revealed no documented report of Resident #5's missing a camera. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of resident council minutes, the facility failed to ensure residents received vision services in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #32) of two residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #32's Health Care Services Consent Form dated 03/22/21 revealed Resident #32 accepted optometry services. Review of Resident #32's progress notes and scanned documents revealed Resident #32 had no vision appointments completed or scheduled. Interview on 10/04/21 at 10:04 A.M. with Resident #32 revealed she had been in the facility since March 2021, had concerns with her vision, had signed the consent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving devices were in place as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #15) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/08/21. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, diabetes with foot ulcer, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The assessment listed the resident as at risk for pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #15's most recent care plan revealed the resident had actual pressure ulcers to the left heel, right heel, left lateral ankle, and left medial foot. Interventions included to provide a pressure redistribution therapeutic device as ordered. Review of Resident #15's physician order dated 09/28/21 revealed an order for off-loading bilateral heel boots…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, review of pharmacy email correspondence, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed timely by the physician. This affected two (#10 and #49) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/19 and a readmission date of 07/17/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and occlusion and stenosis of unspecified carotid artery. Review of a physician order dated 08/01/21 revealed Resident #49 was prescribed clopidogrel bisulfate tablet, an antiplatelet medication, 75 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth in the morning. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 08/01/21 through 10/06/21 revealed Resident #49 received clopidogrel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a pharmacy recommendation form, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician. This affected two (#49 and #70) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/19 and a readmission date of 07/17/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and occlusion and stenosis of unspecified carotid artery. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the plan of care revised 09/23/21 revealed Resident #49 was at high risk for abnormal bleeding due to anticoagulant (medications used to prevent blood clots) therapy. Interventions included administer medications as prescribed by the physician. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, depression, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of a physician recommendation form dated 05/21/21 revealed the resident received Vitamin D 50,000 units by mouth. A recommendation was made to the physician by the pharmacist for a Vitamin D level to be drawn every six months. The recommendation form to check a Vitamin D level was marked as agree by the physician and was signed by the physician on 07/16/21. Review of physician orders dated 02/14/19 revealed Resident #10 was to receive Ergocalciferol (Vitamin D), 50,000 units by mouth once weekly. The medication was reordered on 07/19/21.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely dental services. This affected one (Resident #32) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #32's care plan revised 06/15/21 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit, resistance to care, impaired cognitive function, depression, and potential for oral/dental health problems. Review of Resident #32's Health Care Services Consent Form dated 03/22/21 revealed Resident #32 accepted dentistry services. Review of Resident #32's progress notes and scanned documents revealed Resident #32 had no dental appointments completed or scheduled.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms were free of peeling paint. This affected two (#24 and #29) of two residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/04/21 at 10:10 A.M. of Resident #24's bathroom revealed an approximately three inch area of peeling paint under the wall register vent, peeling paint along the top of the register vent, and an approximately 2 inch area of peeling paint to the lower left of the vent. 2. Observation on 10/04/21 at 11:10 A.M. of Resident #29's bathroom revealed an area approximately 12 inches long and three inches wide of peeling paint located on the wall between the sink and wall register vent. Interview on 10/04/21 3:47 P.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 345 verified the peeling paint in Resident #24 and #29's bathrooms. Interview on 10/06/21 at 7:55 A.M. of Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #376 revealed he was aware of the peeling paint in Resident #24 and #29's bathrooms. MS #376 stated he was the only maintenance staff at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$18,880 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $18,880 — penalty dated 2025-06-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROWN OHIO HOLDCO II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2019 |
| CROWN II TBD HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/29/2021 |
| FEJCC TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| MDATAS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| MRS FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| FRIEDMAN, YISRAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| NEUMAN, MARK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| SINGER, MEIR | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2019 |
| WEINTRAUB, MOSHE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| CAPITAL FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| DAUBENMIRE, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| ELKINS WAY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/31/2022 |
| GARG, ANU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| GREGORY, JACKIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $673K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365745. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.