Versailles Rehabilitation And Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 85.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a dietary communication form and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was supervised during meal service when being provided with hot liquids. This resulted in actual harm for one resident (#49) when she suffered burns from being served hot liquids on two separate occasions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a staff member used a gait belt while transferring a second resident (#25) resulting in an avoidable fall that did not result in injury. This affected two (#49 and #25) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 01/13/17. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, transient cerebral ischemic attack, weakness, major depressive disorder, dementia, anxiety disorder, anxiety and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, review of a facility self reported incident (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse. This affected two (#26 and #90) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/27/25 with medical diagnoses of dementia with psychotic disturbances, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and mood disorder. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/03/25, which indicated Resident #26 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision with toilet hygiene and was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and bed mobility. Review of a physician order dated 06/27/25 stated Resident #26 had a mental disorder with diagnosis of behavioral disturbances and met the criteria for placement on the Mental Health Unit (MHU) and would benefit from the structure and activity-based…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, observation, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had orders and were assessed for secured units resulting in involuntary seclusion. This affected two (#60 and #180) of two residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion and had the potential to affect 13 additional residents (#3, #4, #5, #7, #17, #26, #32, #34, #35, #62, #68, #73, and #76) residing in the secured mental health unit (MHU) that did not orders for and were not assessed for admission to the secured MHU. The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/26/24. Diagnoses listed included epilepsy, hypertension, anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, and depression. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #60 had severely impaired cognition and was receiving Hospice services. Further review of Resident #60's medical record revealed no order for admission to secured MHU. There was no documentation of any assessments being completed to ensure Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician progress notes accurately reflected an evaluation of the resident's condition and program of care. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #43 revealed admission date of 09/19/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, type two diabetes with unspecified complications, anxiety and hypertension. The resident was admitted to Hospice on 02/06/25 and remained at the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had severely impaired cognition. She was dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. A plan of care revealed Resident #43 had a terminal illness care plan which included interventions to notify hospice with any changes, if pain medications were ineffective, and to provide care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of arbitration agreements and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility staff knew a residents' cognitive status and ability to understand before having the resident sign an arbitration agreement. This affected three (#29, #60, and #66) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 10/28/24 with diagnoses of pathological fracture, left ankle, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, other fracture of unspecified lower leg, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident was independent with bed mobility and wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed ensure Hospice provider contracts, plans of care, and/or communication binders were available at the facility. This affected (#60) of one reviewed for Hospice. The census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/26/24. Diagnoses listed included epilepsy, hypertension, anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, and depression. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and a revealed Resident #60 had severely impaired cognition and was receiving Hospice services. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 03/22/25 for Hospice services for intracranial hemorrhage. Further review of Resident #60's medical record revealed no documentation of the Hospice provider agreement or plan of care. Resident #60 was unable to be interviewed during the survey from 05/05/25 through 05/08/25 due to her impaired cognitive status. Interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medications were administered as ordered resulting in two medication errors out of 31 opportunities or a 6.45 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected one (#13) of three residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed admission date of 02/13/25. Diagnoses include fracture of the ninth and tenth thoracic (T-9, T-10) vertebrae, spinal fusion, and surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system. Review of Resident #13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the assessment was not completed at the time of the survey. Review of Resident #13's care plan revealed a care plan for impaired skin integrity as evidenced by surgical incision to midline spine, left and right midline spine with interventions which included wound evaluation, dietician consult and medications as ordered. Review of Resident #13's physician orders revealed an order for Magnesium 250 milligrams (mg) give two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from foul odors. This affected two (Resident #43 and #44) of two residents reviewed for concerns with foul odors. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Interview on 10/03/24 at 9:38 A.M. with Resident #44 revealed concerns with odor in the hall. Resident #44 stated all the time this guy has the hallways smelling like pot [cannabis]. It's ridiculous. Interview on 10/03/24 at 9:53 A.M. with Resident #43 stated she has a concern with the strong odor of cannabis coming into her room from next door. When she exits the room, she has to smell it in the hallway as well. I do not like being around drugs, I'm afraid I will get it into my lungs and my system. Interview on 10/03/24 at 11:21 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #272 confirmed Resident #19 frequently has a strong odor coming from his room and stated room [ROOM NUMBER] does not smell like someone has smoked in the room, it just has a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents and prevent further potential sexual abuse while the investigation was in process. This affected two (Residents #19 and #76) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/28/24. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus without complications, bipolar disorder, and current episode hypomanic. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. Resident #19 was independent with wheelchair mobility and required supervision from staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan dated 08/30/24 revealed Resident #19 has behaviors related to refuses medications, resistant care, verbally aggressive toward others, will refuse therapy, and will make false allegations. Review of the medical record for Resident #76…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family member interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess for pain, administer medication for pain, and document effectiveness of the pain control interventions for one resident. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The current census is 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/10/24, transferred to the hospital on [DATE], returned to the facility on [DATE], and passed at the facility with hospice services on 05/06/24. Diagnoses for Resident #1 included: urinary tract infection, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, obesity, cellulitis, and altered mental status. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was a two-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Review of Resident #1's physician ordered medications revealed on 04/10/24, the resident was ordered to receive Acetaminophen 500 milligrams (mg) every 8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure suprapubic catheter care was completed and documented in the medical record. This affected three (#9, #14, #45) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #45 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation's, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety, major depression, history of mental and behavioral disorders, and history of urinary tract infections. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #45 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #45 is independently ambulatory, and requires set up assistance for eating, toileting, and transfers. Resident #45 has an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the plan of care for Resident #45 revealed resident has a need for supra-pubic catheter. Interventions include monitor for signs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH