No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highland House Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

2201 NW Highland Avenue, Grants Pass, OR 97526 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (541) 474-1901 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (541) 474-1901 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$36,852 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,852 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1701 NW Hawthorne Ave · (541) 471-3455 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
414 SW 6th St · (541) 476-4262 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1824 NW Highland Ave · (541) 479-0044 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1750 NW Hawthorne Ave · (541) 471-6435 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2015 NW Highland Ave · (541) 476-9522

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.4%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.9%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.5%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.2%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%13.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.7%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.4%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.1%16.1%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.6%CMS range 55.4–70.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.4–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.5–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
45.5%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.14 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
29
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined a facility employee sexually abused 6 of 10 sampled residents (#s 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11) who were reviewed for sexual abuse. As a result of the pattern of sexual abuse, it was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation and residents experienced psychosocial harm. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in April 2024, with diagnoses including a stroke. Review of a progress note dated 6/16/24 at 9:45 AM revealed Resident 6 reported to staff that a night shift male CNA came into her/his room every hour to provide incontinence care and played with her/his clit. Resident 6 requested Staff 2 to not provide care for her/him anymore. Review of a facility's investigation completed on 6/21/24 revealed on 6/16/24 Resident 6 reported to facility staff an allegation of sexual abuse by Staff 2 (CNA). Resident 6 indicated Staff 2 would enter the resident's room every hour to provide incontinence care even though the resident did not require incontinence care and was playing with my clit. The resident also indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide necessary treatment related to bowel care for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 12 and 18) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for dehydration, incontinence and weight loss. Findings include:A 7/1/25 Standing Orders signed by the physician on 7/3/25, indicated if a resident experienced new onset diarrhea, staff were to hold bowel care if loose stools occurred.1. Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive. A 1/31/26 admission MDS indicated Resident 12 was moderately cognitively impaired. A 3/2026 Documentation Survey Report (CNA tasks) documented Resident 12 had loose stools as follows:-3/1/26: Night shift -3/4/26: Evening shift -3/7/26: Evening and night shift-3/8/26: Day shift -3/9/26: Day shift -3/11/26: Day, evening, and night shift-3/12/26: Day and night shift -3/13/26: Day shift -3/14/26: Day shift -3/15/26: Day shift -3/16/26: Day shift -3/17/26: Day shift documented as two times -3/18/26:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to keep air temperatures between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit for 2 of 4 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a homelike environment. Findings include: On 9/30/25 at 9:34 AM, the thermostat in the 100 Hall displayed a temperature of 67 F. A second thermostat in the hall displayed a temperature of 68 F. On 9/30/2025 at 4:35 PM, Resident 106 stated her/his room was cold in the morning and she/he had to put on extra clothes. On 9/30/2025 at 4:42 PM, Resident 65 stated her/his room was very cold at times and stated her/his roommate, who could not be interviewed, frequently complained of being cold. On 12/2/25 at 9:00 AM, temperatures were taken in rooms 501, 505 and 506 by Staff 12 (Maintenance Director) and ranged from 66-68 F. Staff 12 stated hall thermostats being set too low was an ongoing problem in the facility. On 12/2/25 at 10:07 AM, Staff 24 (CNA) stated she received complaints from residents of rooms being too cold. On 12/2/25 at 10:09 AM, the thermostat in 500 Hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure community use CBG monitors were cleaned with an Environmental Protection Agency approved disinfectant for 2 of 5 Halls (300 Hall and 400 Hall). This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: 1. On 9/30/25 at 11:14 AM Staff 31 (CNA) was observed to clean a community use CBG monitor with an alcohol wipe. Staff 31 stated she always used the wipes to clean the monitors. Staff 31 stated Resident #s 5, 11, 61, 80, and 90 had CBGs checked. a. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 5's clinical record revealed she/he did not have a blood-borne pathogen diagnosis On 9/30/25 at 12:10 PM Staff 32 (Interim DNS) stated staff should not clean CBG monitors with alcohol wipes but with a disinfectant which killed blood-borne pathogens. b. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 11's clinical record revealed she/he did not have a diagnosis of a blood-borne pathogen. On 9/30/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directive was in her/his clinical record for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for end-of-life decisions not being honored. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 3's 8/14/24 Care Conference form indicated she/he had an advance directive at home. There was no evidence Resident 3's advance directive was present in her/his clinical record. On 12/2/25 at 11:45 AM Staff 18 (Social Service Director) stated Resident 3 reported she/he had an advance directive at home, but her/his spouse did not bring it to the facility. Staff 18 stated she would follow up with the spouse at the next quarterly care conference to ensure she/he brought it to the facility. On 12/3/25 at 11:48 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated if a resident had an advance directive, it was to be in the resident's clinical file as soon as possible.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's antipsychotic medication was not increased when adverse side effects were present for 1 of 4 sampled residents (# 92) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for irreversible involuntary movements. Findings include: Resident 92 was readmitted to the facility in 8/2025 with a diagnosis of dementia. Resident 92's AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) evaluations revealed on 1/11/25 she/he scored 2, on 8/15/25 she/he scored 7. The scale ranges from zero to 28, the higher the number, the greater the impact of involuntary movements on the resident. Resident 92's Progress Notes from 8/14/25 to 9/9/25 revealed the following:-8/15/25 Alert, able to make needs known. Pleasant and cooperative. -8/16/25 Alert, able to make needs known, and adjusting to the facility. Resident had tremors per baseline. -8/17/25 Alert, independent to eat.-8/24/25 Resident pressed her/his call light every 20 to 30 minutes requesting staff to assist with all her/his ADLs.-8/26/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcers were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 40) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for additional pressure ulcers. Findings include:Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 40's Progress Notes revealed on 9/14/25 she/he was identified to have a pressure injury to the lower spine. The top of the wound had a small opening and treatment was provided. Resident 40's clinical record revealed she/he had two 9/15/25 Skin and Wound Evaluation forms. One revealed Resident 40 developed a facility acquired DTI (Deep Tissue Injury- purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear) located to the buttocks which was 7.5 cm long and 2.4 cm wide. The form indicated the skin was intact but discolored and new treatment orders were implemented. The second form revealed a facility acquired DTI to the spine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of a resident's discharge or hospitalization for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11, 98, and 100) reviewed for discharge and hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their rights, choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include:1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with diagnoses including stroke and respiratory failure. A review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed she/he was discharged to the hospital on 8/30/25 and discharged from the facility on 10/15/25. No evidence was found in the clinical record to indicate the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the resident's discharges on 8/30/25 and 10/15/25. On 12/1/25 at 1:57 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was to be notified of discharges and transfers, and it was not clear who was responsible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for unmet dialysis needs. Findings include: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025 with a diagnosis of kidney disease. A 5/20/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 9 received dialysis Resident 9's Pre and Post Dialysis Assessment form revealed she/he had a central line to the right chest for dialysis access. Resident 9's comprehensive Care Plan Report initiated on 5/13/25 revealed she/he required dialysis. The care plan did not indicate the location of the access site or what to do if the access site came apart or was accidently pulled out. On 12/3/25 at 8:33 AM Staff 14 (LPN Resident Care Manager) verified the care plan did not have the access site identified and the care plan did not include what to do if there was an emergency related to the central line. On 12/3/25 at 11:48 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged not all staff may know what to do if the emergency care was not on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#22) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include:Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including chronic curvature of the spine, dementia, and repeat falls. The 7/28/25 Annual MDS revealed Resident 22 required a wheelchair for transportation and was dependent on staff for walking and transfers. The 10/2025 Documentation Survey Report indicated Resident 22 did not walk ten feet and was dependent on staff to ambulate for all recorded shifts. A 11/10/25 revised care plan indicated Resident 22 required the extensive assistance of one staff with the use of a walker to ambulate, used a cane for mobility and a sit to stand lift for transfers. Resident 22's care plan had no reference to the use of a pillow for positioning comfort. On 10/1/25 at 8:39 AM, Resident 22 was observed in bed eating breakfast from a bedside table. The resident leaned to her/his right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident did not develop a pressure ulcer, failed to identify a pressure ulcer, and provide physician ordered treatments for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3 and 76) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for delayed care and worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (impaired circulation), and right hemiparesis (weakness) due to a stroke. Resident 3's 2/26/25 Admission/readmission Evaluation form revealed she/he was admitted to the facility without a pressure ulcer. Resident 3's Care Plan initiated on 2/26/25 revealed she/he required limited assisted with bed mobility, had peripheral vascular disease and her/his legs were to be elevated when sitting or sleeping (initiated 3/6/25). The care plan also directed staff to report new skin issues. Resident 3's 2/27/25 Nurse Practitioner Encounter Note revealed Resident 3 reported she/he had weakness to the right knee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not have cigarettes and lighters in their rooms and a fall investigation was thoroughly completed for 3 of 10 sampled residents (#1, 11, and 110) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by seizures). The 2/2025 facility Resident Smoking Policy and Procedure revealed ignition sources were not permitted in resident rooms. Lighters belonging to independent smokers were required to be stored in an assigned smoking locker. The 4/9/25 Nursing Smoking Screen revealed Resident 1 smoked more than 10 times daily and was able to light her/his own cigarettes. The 7/25/25 Annual MDS revealed Resident 1 had a BIMS of 15 (cognitively intact), used her/his wheelchair independently, and was a smoker. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions to prevent weight loss for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for continued weight loss. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. a. Resident 40's 6/16/25 Nutritional Evaluation revealed the dietary manager was to evaluate Resident 40 for fortified food, if the resident would accept any of the typical offerings. Resident 40's clinical record revealed a diet order for fortified meals was initiated on 8/3/25. On 12/3/25 at 11:20 AM Staff 37 (District Dietary Manager) stated if a RD wrote orders for a fortified diet the dietary staff implemented the order. The RD would send an email to the dietary staff or would directly add the fortified meal into the resident's dietary orders. Staff 37 stated if a RD recommended a fortified diet but did not write an order, the dietary manager would not communicate with the resident, and the Resident Care Manager would need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient respiratory services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include:Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including stroke and respiratory failure. The 5/24/23 facility Transportation Agreement revealed all vehicles were to be staffed and equipped in accordance with the minimum requirements of federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The 7/4/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 11 required oxygen therapy. The 7/2025 TAR indicated Resident 11 required three liters of oxygen per minute via a nasal canula (a plastic tubing in the nose), staff were to monitor the resident for shortness of breath and maintain oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen traveling through the blood) at or above 90%. A 7/2/25 signed Transportation Request Form indicated Resident 11 had appointments for labs and imaging on 7/7/25, she/he required a companion, and yes was marked for oxygen.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure behavior health services were provided for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 9, 19, and 36) reviewed for behavioral-emotional health and hospice. This placed residents at risk for unresolved emotional needs. Findings include:1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with a diagnosis of kidney disease. Resident 9's 8/13/25 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 9's 8/19/25 Initial Assessment by Witness 7 (Psychologist) revealed Resident 9 had anxiety, memory issues, fear of relocation, and had thoughts of embarrassment due to her/his current health and living situation. Resident 9 denied depression but alluded to the presence of depression. Witness 7 indicated Resident 9's behavioral health needs included emotional support and anxiety management. The plan included a referral to psychiatry to manage medication, low dose antianxiety medications, and regular therapy. Resident 9's clinical record did not reveal a referral to psychiatry or therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident received thickened liquids as ordered for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for aspiration. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 40's 9/16/21 Dietary Order Details revealed she/he was to receive mildly thickened liquids. Resident 40's 9/21/25 Progress Notes revealed Staff 29 (LPN) notified Residents 40's medical provider that she/he aspirated during a meal. Resident 40's provider ordered a chest x-ray. Resident 40's 9/21/25 communication form to Resident 40's medical provider revealed she/he aspirated at lunch while drinking Ensure which was not thickened. The form included a handwritten note by Resident 40's medical provider dated 9/23/25 which revealed Resident 40's chest x-ray was negative. On 10/1/25 at 7:19 AM Staff 29 verified a CNA provided Resident 40 a supplemental drink which was not thickened, Resident 40 aspirated, and she notified her/his physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for being treated with a lack of respect and dignity. Findings include: Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 11/2024, with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease. Resident 12 was on Hospice Services and passed away on 3/9/25. The 2/17/25 facility investigation revealed several staff attempted to assist Resident 12 to sit down in her/his wheelchair. Resident 12 displayed agitation, which included spitting on the ground and toward staff members. Staff 6 (CNA) flicked the resident on the back of her/his hand and stated, If you're going to be mean to me, I'm going to be mean to you. The resident experienced no negative outcome as a result of the interaction. The 2/18/25 Progress Note indicated Resident 11 was combative with staff and Hospice was notified of her/his behavioral changes. The 2/19/25 Progress Note indicated Resident 12 had possible psychosocial distress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess facility acquired pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for unassessed and worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel defined shearing as a pressure injury when tissue layers moved over the top of each other, and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer as a full thickness tissue loss where subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed and some slough (dead tissue often appearing as a yellow, tan, or white fibrous material) may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025, with diagnoses including intestinal bypass and failure to thrive. The resident discharged on 2/10/25. The 1/9/25 Nursing admission Evaluation revealed Resident 11 had a red coccyx upon admission. The 1/11/2025 admission MDS indicated Resident 11 was at risk for pressure ulcers and had no pressure ulcers. The 2/5/25 Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to evaluate a potential unavoidable accident of a feeding tube being dislodged to prevent recurrence for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for safety. This placed residents at risk for dislodged feeding tubes. Findings include: Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 1/2025, with diagnoses including failure to thrive and malnutrition. Resident 11's 1/9/25 Hospital Records revealed a J-tube (feeding tube inserted into stomach or small intestine) was surgically placed. The 1/11/25 admission MDS revealed Resident 11 had a J-tube for enteral feedings (nutritional support). The 2/10/25 Progress Note indicated Staff 7 (CNA) transported Resident 11 to the shower room and when she removed the blanket, the J-tube dislodged and fell out. Staff 7 indicated the J-tube was intact when she placed a bath blanket over her/him in preparation to go to the shower room. The note further revealed an order was received to transfer the resident to the hospital for the J-tube replacement. Review of Resident 11's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for respiratory distress. Findings include: Resident 13 admitted to the facility in 3/2025, with diagnoses including failure to thrive. Resident 13 was on hospice services. Resident 13's 3/20/25 Progress Note indicated she/he was seen by a hospice nurse and the resident's methadone order was increased to 7.5 mg twice daily. Resident 13's 3/20/25 Hospice Order instructed staff to discontinue the previous order for methadone liquid 5 mg twice daily and to increase the methadone liquid 10 mg/ml to 7.5 ml to equal 7.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours for pain management (7.5 ml equaled 75 mg). The 3/2025 MAR indicated Resident 13 was administered 7.5 ml (75 mg) of Methadone on 3/20/25 at 8:00 PM by Staff 10 (CMA). Resident 13's 3/21/25 Hospice Orders included orders for Naloxone HCL nasal spray 4 mg one dose now (medication to reverse narcotic medication effects)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 2 and 3) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for unwanted sexual abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including altered mental status. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of a progress note dated 7/22/24 at 8:50 PM revealed Resident 1 was observed with her/his hand down the front of Resident 2's pants. The residents were separated and the administrator was notified. Review of a physician note dated 7/25/24 at 1:26 PM revealed Resident 1 was caught with her/his hands down the pants of a female resident and in bed with her/his roommate. Resident 1 was placed in a private room and had 1:1 supervision by facility staff. Resident 1 was alert and oriented to place only during the physician visit. Review of a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 4 of 15 sampled residents (Witness 2 and Resident #s 51, 65, and 95) reviewed for dignity and abuse. This placed residents at risk for depression. Findings include: 1. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of cancer. A 3/20/24 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 51 was cognitively intact. On 6/10/24 at 12:27 PM Resident 51 stated staff did not treat her/him with respect. During this interview Staff 4 (CNA) entered Resident 51's room. Resident 51 informed Staff 4 she/he was having a conversation. Staff 4 stated she could pick up the resident's lunch try even if Resident 51 was talking. After Staff 4 left the room, Resident 51 stated she/he did not feel the staff treated her/him with respect. On 6/10/24 at 1:30 PM Staff 4 stated she entered Resident 51's room because the resident's call light was activated. Staff 4 acknowledged Resident 51 stated she/he was in a conversation but Staff 4 stated she could provide resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair, residents' walls and floors were in good repair and failed to provide comfortable sound levels for 5 of 13 sampled residents (#s 20, 29, 51, 90, and 137) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for skin tears and unhomelike conditions. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with a diagnosis including heart disease. On 6/10/24 at 2:30 PM a bathroom tile was observed to be missing on Resident 23's bathroom floor in front of the toilet. There was also a patched area on the bathroom wall with no paint to cover the caulking. The patch was approximately two feet wide and two feet long. On 6/12/24 at 2:13 PM Staff 2 (Administrator) observed the missing tile and the patched wall. On 6/12/24 at 2:48 PM Staff 46 (Maintenance) stated rooms were patched and then were painted when the residents were not in the room. Patching was a priority and not painting. 2. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnosis of stroke. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written grievance resolution or communicate with a resident or resident's representative regarding the resolution of a resident grievance for 6 of 14 sampled residents (#s 8, 83, 84, 86, 87, and 90) reviewed for abuse and dignity. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and grievances. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including a fracture of the right leg. A 6/6/24 Grievance Form revealed Resident 8 had a concern related to a male CNA providing persona care after she/he had requested a female CNA and the male CNA made Resident 8 feel uncomfortable after he requested to change her gown. A 6/7/24 grievance resolution reveled an investigation related to a male CNA requesting to change Resident 8's gown, no evidence of addressing Resident 8's concern related to a male CNA providing personal care. On 6/10/24 at 12:11 PM Resident 8 stated a male CNA came in during the night to provide personal care. Resident 8 stated she/he told the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise and update a care plan intervention for 6 of 11 sampled residents (#s 16, 19, 21, 25, 49 and 51) reviewed for medications care planning, dental and respiratory. This placed residents at risk for unmet of care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A 10/17/23 Nursing Note revealed the provider add the diagnosis of schizophrenia to Resident 16's dignosis list. Resident 16 is prescribed aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medicine that is used to treat schizophrenia)for this condition. A 10/25/23 Psych Consultants report revealed Resident 16 was seen from a facility referral and Resident 16 stated My mind is straight. Resident 16 then stated she/he saw black bugs flying in her/his room and saw them crawling on the window blinds. Resident 16 stated people think she/he was seeing things, but she/he knows they are there. Resident 16 was diagnosed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and monitor for 5 of 14 sampled residents (#s 16, 33, 51, 133, and 134) reviewed for medications, antibiotics, dialysis, and edema. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and constipation. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. a. A 5/2024 MAR instructed staff to administer metoprolol tartrate (to treat high blood pressure) every 12 hours for heart health and to hold the medication if Resident 16's blood pressure was below 100/60 or heart rate was below 60. On the following days and shifts Resident 16's blood pressure was not within physician ordered parameters and she/he was administered metoprolol: 5/2/24 day shift, 5/4/24 day shift, 5/7/24 evening shift, 5/8/24 evening shift, 5/9/24 day shift, 5/10/24 evening shift, 5/15/24 evening shift, 5/16/24 day shift, 5/17/24 evening shift, 5/18/24 evening shift, 5/19/24 evening shift, 5/23/24 evening shift, 5/26/24 evening shift, and 5/28/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) from 5/9/24 through 6/9/24 revealed no census documented on 6/5/24 day and evening shift, 6/6/24 evening shift, or 6/8/24 night shift. On 6/11/24 at 5:25 AM the DCSDR was observed posted by the nurses station. The night shift was blank for resident census, number of staff and hours worked. On 6/12/24 at 8:02 AM the DCSDR was observed to have 6/11/24 posted. No census was documented for evening shift or night shift. At 9:17 AM the 6/12/24 DCSDR was posted with no census documented on the day shift. In an interview on 6/14/24 at 10:22 AM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 39 (Regional Director of Clinical) reported it was expected to have an accurate DCSDR posted within one hour of a shift change.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of Cancer. A 4/30/24 Pharmacy report recommended Resident 51's ferrous sulfate (supplement) should be discontinued because the resident's iron level was normal and docusate (treats constipation) because it was not an effective medication. A 6/2024 MAR revealed Resident 51 continued to be administered ferrous sulfate and docusate. On 6/11/24 at 2:33 PM a request was made to Staff 2 (DNS) to provide documentation Resident 51's physician declined 4/31/24 pharmacy recommendations. No additional information was provided. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow pharmacy recommendations for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 16, 33, 63, and 51) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. a. A 10/28/23 Recommendation Summary for Medical Director and DON indicated Resident 16 required a gradual dose reduction assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility administration rate was 7.41% with two errors in 27 opportunities. This placed residents at risk for ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with a diagnosis of chronic pain. A 10/3/23 Order revealed staff were to apply an external pain patch to both knees. A 4/4/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 34 was cognitively intact. On 6/11/24 at 8:21 AM Staff 56 (CMA) was observed to apply a medicated pain patch to Resident 34's right arm and right leg. On 6/12/24 at 8:18 AM Resident 34 stated she/he only used the patch on the right arm and leg and did not require it on the left knee. On 6/12/24 08:20 AM Staff 56 stated she applied the patch only in the locations Resident 34 preferred. On 6/12/24 at 9:19 AM Staff 30 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated if a resident did not want the patch applied to the location ordered the order should be clarified. Staff 30 stated the patch was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 3 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 3, 5, and 6) reviewed training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of the facility's staff training records revealed the following: -Staff 3 (CNA), hired 1/26/06 completed 10 hours of documented training from 1/25/23 through 1/25/24. -Staff 5 (CNA), hired 4/7/10, completed six hours of documented training from 4/27/23 through 4/27/24. -Staff 6 (CNA), hired 3/28/16, completed 10 hours of documented training from 3/28/23 through 3/28/24. In an interview on 6/14/24 at 10:23 AM Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 39 (Regional Director of Clinical) stated it was expected the staff complete the 12 hours of annual training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and/or resident's responsible party of the risk and benefits for the use of an antipsychotic medication and the risk and benefits of not following a prescribed diet for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 16, 33, and 335) reviewed for medications and diet. This placed residents' and resident responsible parties at risk for lack of informed consent and decision making. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A 3/2023 MAR instructed staff to administer aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication treat depression and schizophrenia) one time a day related to schizophrenia with a start date of 3/3/23. There was no documentation found in Resident 16's clinical record to show she/he had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Resident 16's 5/17/23 Antispychotic Medication Informed Consent indicated she/he had a physician order for aripiprazole for depression and anxiety, and the resident experienced inconsolable fear and crying. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#89) reviewed for falls. This placed resident representatives at risk for being uninformed of resident accidents. Findings include: Resident 89 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses including a fractured leg and pelvis. The MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 89 had a BIMS score of nine, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 89's undated admission Record revealed Witness 1 (Family Member) was Resident 89's emergency contact. On 6/5/24 at 12:48 PM Witness 1 stated Resident 89 fell out of bed at the facility two days after her/his admission. Witness 1 stated Resident 89 informed Witness 1 of the fall, but was unsure how the resident had fallen out of bed. Witness 1 was upset because facility staff did not notify her of the incident or potential injuries. On 6/12/24 at 4:00 PM Staff 21 (LPN) stated Resident 89 had an unwitnessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of resident records in 1 of 1 Social Services office. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy and confidentiality. Findings include: On 6/14/24 at 10:18 AM Staff 36's (Social Services Director) office door was observed open with no staff present. The left computer monitor screen was visible with a resident's electronic health record and the right computer monitor screen was open and accessible email. The office was observed to contain with many papers with residents names and information which included transportation forms, State of Oregon letters to residents, completed discharge checklists, completed requests to transfer and individual resident care conference information. On 6/14/24 from 10:18 AM to 10:38 AM multiple staff and residents were observed in the area of Staff 36's office and were able to access the resident records. On 6/14/24 at 10:38 AM Staff 36 stated she left her office door open while she was in the facility to let people know she was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the use of a physical restraint for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#57) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for potential abuse or neglect. Findings include: Resident 64 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis of brain damage and anxiety. A 9/26/23 Fall Risk Evaluation indicated Resident 64 experienced multiple falls in the past three months. Resident 64 exhibited balance issues while standing and had a seizure disorder. Resident 64 was at risk for falls. A 10/14/23 care plan indicated Resident 64 experienced decreased mobility and was at risk for falls. Interventions included a fall mat to the right side of the bed, anticipate her/his needs, bed against the wall and to ensure commonly used items were in reach. A 4/5/24 MDS assessed Resident 64 with no physical restraints in place and had no falls since the resident's last MDS assessment. Resident 64 was rarely understood. On 6/12/24 at 9:13 AM, and on 6/13/24 5:42 AM, and at 8:05 am Resident 64 was observed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to report a resident to resident altercation for 2 of 11 sampled residents (#s 20 and 91 ) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for ongoing abuse. 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with a diagnosis of heart disease. A 12/16/23 Annual MDS revealed Resident 20 was cognitively impaired. Resident 20's Care Plan initiated 12/10/21 revealed Resident 20 propelled in a wheelchair. Review of Resident 20's clinical record revealed there were no resident to resident altercations identified in 11/2023. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with a diagnosis of seizures. Resident 30's Care Plan initiated in 2020 revealed Resident 30 was physically aggressive towards others due to a head injury. Staff were to intervene if the resident showed agitation to prevent escalated behaviors. A 12/20/23 Psychotropic Medication Review revealed Resident 30 had aggressive behavior. Review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed in 11/2023 she/he was not in a resident to resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate for abuse for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#65) reviewed for dignity and respect. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 65 admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including kidney failure. An 8/15/24 care plan revealed Resident 65 had a history of trauma. Interventions included staff were to avoid re-traumatizing the resident with thoughtful approaches to care and avoid being rude to Resident 65. An 8/23/24 Social Services Note indicated Resident 65 stated she/he had issues with Staff 4 (CNA), Staff 5 (CNA), and Staff 6 (CNA). Resident 65 stated they were rude and refused to provide her/him a shower and they did not listen to the residents. Resident 65 stated they needed to listen to the residents during resident care, and she/he did not want Staff 4 and Staff 6 in her/his room. No documentation was found in Resident 65's clinical record an investigation was completed for alleged abuse. On 9/4/24 at 12:38 PM Resident 65 stated two CNAs were talking, they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents related to behaviors for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for behavioral health assessments. This placed residents at risk for unassessed behavioral emotional healthcare needs and services. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2017 with a diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder (mental health and mood condition). Resident 25's 5/6/24 Annual MDS assessed her/him with moderately impaired cognition. Resident 25 was assessed with no behaviors exhibited. On 6/12/24 at 10:43 AM Resident 25 was observed to sit in the hallway, repetitively grab and abruptly move her/his coffee cup, talk to her/himself and stated fuck you to a staff who walked past her/him. On 6/13/24 at 9:08 AM Resident 25 was observed to sit in the hallway, push and pull her/his bedside table, talk to her/himself and said fuck you to Staff 2 (DNS) as he attempted to give a Resident 25 a high-five greeting. On 6/13/24 at 10:21 AM Staff 6 (CNA) stated Resident 25's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to document and conduct a Significant Change MDS assessment within the required timeframe for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#57) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. A 11/13/23 admission MDS indicated the following: -Cognitively intact. -No depression concerns. -Set up or clean-up assistance for upper body dressing. -Supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene. -Occasional bladder incontinence. -No falls since admission, but a history of falling in the last month. A 5/15/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the following: -Moderately impaired. -Feeling down and depressed two to six days in the seven-day look back period. -Partial moderate assistance for upper body dressing. -Substantial to maximal assistance for personal hygiene. -Frequent bladder incontinence. -Two or more falls since prior assessment. -Hypoglycemic (low blood sugars). The 5/29/24 care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation (evaluation for individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for PASARR's. This placed residents at risk for not receiving specialized mental health services. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (serious mental condition with breakdowns in thoughts, emotions, and behaviors), bipolar disorder (extreme mood swings) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (mental condition with intense emotional and/or physical reaction). Resident 25's 5/6/24 Annual MDS indicated she/he was not considered to have a serious mental illness and therefore no Level ll PASARR was completed. A review of Resident 25's Electronic Health Record revealed there was no Level Il PASARR referral or evaluation completed. In an interview on 6/14/24 at 10:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for 2 of 12 sampled resident (#s 134 and 335) reviewed for dialysis, accidents, and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 134 was admitted to the facility 12/2/23 with a diagnosis of kidney disease. A 12/2/24 hospital After Visit Summary revealed Resident 134 was to receive dialysis three times a week and her/his first scheduled treatment was 12/4/23. Review of Resident 134's baseline care plan revealed there was no information related to when she/he was scheduled for dialysis or the type and location of Resident 134's dialysis access. On 6/11/24 at 2:06 PM Staff 30 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated a base line care plan was developed by the nurse who did the initial admission paperwork and by the resident care managers as they reviewed the resident's hospital paperwork. Staff 30 acknowledged a baseline care plan for dialysis was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for a diagnosed mental disorder for 1 of 6 (#16) sampled residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A 2/21/23 hospital History and Physical revealed Resident 16 was seen for right hip pain after sustaining a fall. A review of past medical history revealed no diagnosis of schizophrenia. Resident was on the medication aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication used to treat depression and schizophrenia) and escitalopram (an antidepressant to treat depression and anxiety). A psychiatric evaluation revealed mood, behavior, thought content and judgement were normal. A 3/2023 MAR instructed Staff to administer aripiprazole one time a day for schizophrenia. A 3/6/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact with no hallucinations, delusions or behaviors exhibited during the seven day look back period. The assessment also indicated Resident 16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident had glasses for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for communication-sensory. This placed residents at risk for unmet vision needs. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with a diagnosis of dementia. A 3/17/23 quarterly MDS indicated Resident 20 had adequate vision with corrective lenses. On 6/10/24 at 12:36 PM Witness 3 (Spouse) stated Resident 20 liked to read and wore glasses, but the glasses were broken. On 6/10/24 at 1:46 PM Resident 20 was observed to read and she/he did not wear glasses. Staff 52 stated Resident 20's glasses were broken for some time. On 6/12/24 at 2:36 PM Staff 53 (CNA) stated Resident 20's lens was missing since at least 12/2023. On 6/12/24 at 2:23 PM Staff 36 (Social Service Director) stated on 6/11/23 she just found an unsigned note on her desk reporting one of Resident 20's lens was broken. Staff 36 was not aware of of the issue and Resident 20 did not have any scheduled vision appointments.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#51, 57 and 63) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: 1. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of cancer. An Unwitnessed Fall investigation dated 3/14/24 revealed on 3/14/24 Resident 51 slipped out of bed. Interventions to prevent future falls included staff readjusted the mattress to ensure it was centered on the bed frame and nonslip material was to be applied under the mattress. A care plan updated 3/14/24 revealed to prevent falls Resident 51 was to have nonslip material applied to the bed mattress to ensure the mattress did not slip. A 3/20/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 51 was cognitively intact. On 6/10/24 at 12:25 PM Resident 51 stated her/his mattress did not fit the bed frame and caused her/him to fall. Resident 51 also stated staff did not provide her/him with a new mattress. On 6/11/24 at 4:51 PM with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 2/1/24 Nutritional Screen indicated Resident 19 was to be provided a diabetic nutritional supplement BID to prevent weight loss. An 4/2024 MAR revealed Resident 19 received a supplement BID through 4/7/24 and was out of the facility through 4/16/24. Resident 19's supplement was not restarted after 4/16/24. An 4/20/24 Nutritional Screen revealed Resident 19 was assessed and the plan was to continue with the current plan and to monitor the resident for weight loss. On 6/13/24 at 9:18 AM Staff 30 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated the resident was hospitalized in 4/2024 and acknowledged the resident's supplement was not restarted upon readmission to the facility.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to obtain orders for oxygen and clean a resident's oxygen equipment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#51) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for unsanitary conditions and lack of monitoring. Findings include: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of cancer. On 6/10/24 at 12:39 PM Resident 51 was observed to wear a nasal canula (device to administer oxygen through the nose). The back of Resident 51's oxygen concentrator (machine which takes air from the surroundings, extracts oxygen and filters it into purified oxygen) was observed to have a thick layer of dust over the vent. Resident 51's clinical record did not contain orders for oxygen. On 6/11/24 at 2:25 PM with Staff 55 (LPN) Resident 51's concentrator was observed to have a thick layer of dust on the vents. Staff 55 stated she was new to the facility but the equipment was to be cleaned weekly and the amount of dust on the vents indicated it was not cleaned for a long time. Staff 55 stated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#85, and 339) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for increased pain. Findings include: 1. Resident 85 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including arm and leg fractures. A 11/17/23 Pain Assessment revealed Resident 85 did not have pain at the time of the assessment but reported pain interfered with her/his sleep and social activities. A 11/22/23 admission MDS revealed Resident 85 reported constant pain for the last five days. A 11/2023 MAR and associated progress notes revealed the following: -Resident 85 was to be administered oxycodone every four hours while awake. From 11/24/23 through 11/27/23 Resident 85 was not administered the medication six times. -From 11/27/23 Percocet was to be administered every four hours. Notes indicated the medication was not available. -No additional medications were added for pain relief. Resident 85's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and account for the residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for Behavioral-Emotional. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and a decrease in their quality of life. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, mental condition with intense emotional and/or physical reaction). Resident 25's 5/6/24 Annual MDS assessed her/him with moderately impaired cognition and a PTSD diagnosis. Resident 25's 6/11/24 SS (social service) Post-Traumatic Checklist assessed her/him to experience anger outbursts, difficulty concentrating, unable to answer complicated questions and was irritable. Interventions for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was transported to dialysis for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#134) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for worsening kidney function. Findings include: Resident 134 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of kidney disease. 12/2/23 hospital orders revealed Resident 134 was to receive dialysis at a dialysis center on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. On 12/12/23 Staff 43 (Former RN) reported to the State Survey Agency the facility did not follow up with transportation for Resident 134 and On 12/11/23 (Monday) she/he missed a dialysis treatment. On 6/10/24 at 6:56 PM Staff 43 stated the facility was aware Resident 134 required transportation to the dialysis unit, the paperwork was submitted, but they did not transport the resident. On 6/20/24 via e-mail, Staff 2 (DNS) indicated Resident 134 did not go to dialysis. No additional information was provided for the rationale Resident 134 did not attend dialysis. On 6/21/24 Witness 10 (Dialysis RN) verified Resident 134…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 5 halls (200 hall) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: On 6/14/24 at 10:08 AM, Staff 37 (CNA) was observed carrying dirty linens down the 200 hall and entering the soiled linen room. Staff 37 acknowledged not having bags in her pocket and was aware that linens should be placed in a bag before transport. In an interview on 6/14/24 at 10:26 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 39 (Regional Director of Clinical) stated the expectation of staff were to place dirty linen in a bag for transport from resident room to soiled linen room.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered an antibiotic without indication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#86) reviewed for UTI. This placed residents at risk for drug resistant infections. Findings include: Resident 86 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of UTI. A 10/7/23 Progress Note revealed Resident 86 had increased confusion. The physician was notified and Resident 86 was sent to the hospital for evaluation, treatment, and returned on 10/8/23. Resident 86's urine culture results dated 10/7/23 revealed there was a mixed growth of skin and or genital organisms indicating an improper collection. The form revealed a new sample was to be submitted if clinically indicated. A 10/2023 MAR revealed Resident 86 was administered antibiotics from 10/10/23 through 10/16/23 for an UTI. On 6/14/24 at 9:29 AM Staff 2(DNS) stated 72 hours after an antibiotic was started the facility staff were to review the test results to ensure an antibiotic was indicated. Staff 2 stated a 72 hour review was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain copies and provide assistance to residents who expressed interest in formulating an advance directive for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 6, 18, and 32) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their healthcare decisions honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 12/2019 with diagnoses including heart disease. Resident 6's 12/7/22 Annual MDS revealed she/he had a BIMS of 15 (cognitively intact). A 2/8/23 Interdisciplinary Note revealed advance directive education was provided to Resident 6. On 3/7/23 at 10:39 AM Staff 3 (DNS) was unable to locate an advance directive for Resident 6. On 3/7/23 at 1:03 PM Staff 16 (Social Services Director) stated she was not familiar with an advance directive and thought the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was the same thing. Staff 16 confirmed she did not review advance directives with residents. On 3/8/23 at 10:33 AM Resident 6 stated she/he would fill out one out (advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 3 of 5 halls (200, 300 and 400 hall) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unhomelike environment. Findings include: 1. On 3/6/23 at 4:41 PM the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be very dirty and difficult to see through. There was a black substance built-up along the bottom left corner and the base of the window. On 3/8/23 at 1:45 PM and 3/9/23 at 2:44 PM Staff 22 (Maintenance Director) confirmed the window was very dirty and reported the window had to be replaced because the dirt was on the inside of the glass (double paned window) and could not be washed. On 3/9/23 at 1:39 PM Staff 2 (Assistant Administrator) was informed of the findings of the investigation. No additional information was provided. 2. On 3/6/23 at 1:53 PM Resident 32's windowsill was observed to have four nails sticking up along the length of the windowsill and a portion of the wood was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders and bowel protocols were followed for 4 of 16 sampled residents (#s 15, 34 and 166) reviewed for medications, ADLs and respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for adverse health consequences. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including lumbar fracture. The facility's undated Bowel Protocol indicated after day 3 of no bowel movement to give milk of magnesia (laxative) 30 ml PO or give 10 mg bisacodyl (laxative) PO. The 2/15/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact. On 3/6/23 at 3:41 PM Resident 15 stated she/he had not had a bowel movement in a week. On 3/7/23 at 12:00 PM bowel documentation was reviewed and indicated Resident 15's last bowel movement was on 3/1/23. The electronic health record was reviewed including MARs and progress notes. There was no indication Resident 15 was offered milk of magnesia or bisacodyl. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 4 of 5 halls (100, 200, 300 and 400) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 3/6/23 and 3/10/23 the facility provided lists of residents who: -Required assistance or were dependent with eating: 31 -Required a mechanical lift with transfers: 16 -Required one or two-person assistance with dressing: 61 -Required one or two-person assistance or dependent with toileting: 58 - Required one or two-person assistance with bathing: 40 -Were fully dependent on staff for bathing: 20 -Wandered: 1 -Received therapy services: 39 On 3/6/23 the facility had 7 residents and in 4/2022 the facility had 6 residents approved for the bariatric rate. A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 2/1/23 through 3/5/23 and 4/1/22 through 4/30/22 revealed the following days when the state minimum bariatric CNA staffing ratios were not met for one or more shifts: - 4/1/22 - 4/3/22 - 4/9/22 - 4/11/22 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 4 sampled CNA staff (#s 7, 8, 9 and 10) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 3/7/23 at 2:30 PM Staff 2 (Assistant Administrator) was asked for the annual performance reviews for Staff 7 (CNA), Staff 8 (CNA), Staff 9 (CNA), and Staff 10 (CNA). On 3/7/23 at 2:37 PM Staff 2 provided written documentation indicating the facility did not require performance reviews to be completed. Staff 2 confirmed no performance reviews were completed for the identified CNA staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports were complete for 10 of 33 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incorrect staffing information. Findings include: Review of the 2/1/23 through 3/5/23 Direct Care Staff Daily Reports indicated the following days when required information was missing or incorrect on the daily postings: -2/12/23 -2/13/23 -2/15/23 -2/19/23 -2/20/23 -2/25/23 -2/26/23 -3/1/23 -3/5/23 On 3/10/23 at 8:45 AM Staff 2 (Assistant Administrator) acknowledged the missing and/or inaccurate information for the identified dates.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen refrigerator reviewed for sanitary food storage. This placed residents at risk for exposure to harmful bacteria, reduced nutritive value and stale food products. Findings include: The facility's Food and Nutrition Services Food Safety policy, dated 7/2018, indicated the following regarding refrigerated foods: -Food, including leftovers, will be labeled and dated in the refrigerator. On 3/6/23 at 12:06 PM during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen, the walk-in refrigerator was observed to contain the following improperly stored items and unsanitary conditions: -One package of turkey-pastrami dated 2/17/23; -One round, plastic container of egg salad-undated; -Two apple juice and two orange juice canisters-undated; -Five large pastry bags of white whipped cream and one large pastry bag of chocolate whipped cream-undated; -Three Styrofoam bowls of chocolate pudding-undated; -One Styrofoam bowl of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: The facility's Right to Self-Administer Medications policy, dated 7/2018, indicated the following: -If a resident requested to self-administer medications it was the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to determine if it was safe before the resident exercises the right. A resident may self-administer medications after the IDT determined which medications may be self-administered. -Appropriate documentation of the determinations would be documented in the resident's medical record and care plan. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including psoriasis (a skin disease marked by red, itchy, scaly patches) and mild cognitive impairment. A 3/2/23 physician order indicated nursing staff were to apply Triamcinolone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by Witness 3 (Alledged Perpetrator/Medical Transportation Driver) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#54) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, revised 11/2017, defined sexual abuse as any form of nonconsensual sexual contact, including but not limited to unwanted or inappropriate touching .in the form of touching of the sexual or intimate parts .This protection extended to abuse by staff, consultants, contractors, volunteers, students and visitors. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses including major depression. Resident 54's 12/19/22 admission MDS indicated a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). A FRI was submitted to the state agency on 2/12/23 which revealed the following: On Sunday 2/12/23 Witness 3 signed into the facility's visitor log and went to visit Resident 54 in her/his room. Resident 54 stated Witness 3 entered her/his room, began to rub…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#54) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse and inaccurate investigations. Findings include: The 10/2005 Oregon Nursing Facility Abuse Reporting and Investigation Guide for Providers specified a thorough investigation is a systematic collection of information that describes and explains an incident or series of incidents. The investigation seeks to determine if abuse occurred, how the incident occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences. Critical component(s) of any investigation include the timely initiation of the investigation and the thoroughness of the investigation. The evidence data should be accurate and appropriate to include testimonial, documented, pictorial and physical evidence as applicable to come to a conclusion and it is important that conclusions not be reached without adequate information. Each investigation must seek to answer who, what, where, when, why and how, through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review was determined the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for 1 of 9 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 12/2019 with diagnoses which included heart failure and arthritis. Resident 30's 1/6/23 Annual MDS indicated she/he had a BIMS of 15 (cognitively intact). The MDS indicated she/he required extensive assistance with toilet use. Resident 30's 1/2023 care plan indicated Resident 30 was independent with toilet use. On 3/9/23 at 1:19 PM Staff 31 (CNA) stated Resident 30 was independent with toilet use and required very little assistance. On 3/9/23 at 1:31 PM Staff 32 (LPN/Unit Manager) confirmed Resident 30 was independent with toilet use and the Annual MDS was coded inaccurately for extensive assistance for toilet use. On 3/9/23 at 1:37 PM Staff 3 (DNS) acknowledged she expected the MDS was coded accurately to reflect the Resident 30's needs for toiliting

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 11 (Former Staff/RN) adhered to professional standards for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medication and hospitalization. Findings include: Resident 167 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, atrial fibrillation and stroke. Resident 167 discharged on 6/6/22. The 5/26/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 167 was cognitively intact. According to mayoclinic.org a regular resting heart rate is 60-100 beats per minute. Resident 167's 6/2022 MARs indicated she/he received the following morning medications on 6/5/22: -Aspirin 81 mg (antiplatelet medication) -Breo Ellipta Aerosol powder (bronchodilator medication) -Combivent Respimat aerosol solution (bronchodilator medication) -Eplerenone 25 mg (antihypertensive medication) -Lasix 40 mg (diuretic medication) -lisinopril 10 mg (antihypertensive medication) -Pacerone 100 mg (antiarrhythmic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bathing assistance to dependent residents for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 4 and 18) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of hygiene. Finding include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and for an infection to her/his dialysis chest catheter. Resident 18's 1/27/23 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he had a BIMS score of 12 (moderate cognitive impairment) and was totally dependent on two staff for physical assistance with showers. A review of the 30-day shower log revealed Resident 18 received a sponge bath on 2/17/23. Resident 18's shower days were on Monday and Friday, which were also her/his dialysis days. There was no evidence in Resident 18's health record to indicate she/he was provided with a shower between 2/18/23 and 3/7/23. On 3/7/23 at 8:55 AM Resident 18 stated she/he had not received a shower in two weeks and let multiple staff members know she/he did not receive a shower. On 3/7/23 at 3:34 PM Staff 23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide routine diabetic foot care for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 10 and 34) reviewed for foot care. This placed residents at risk for pain. Findings include: The facility's Quality of Care Foot Care policy, dated 8/2018, indicated the following: -To provide the resident with foot care, including treatment to prevent complications from diabetes, peripheral vascular disease or immobility that is consistent with professional standards of practice. -Treatment includes preventive care to minimize podiatric complications in residents with diabetes and circulatory disorders. -Residents with complicating disease processes will be referred to qualified professionals for foot care. 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. On 3/6/23 at 3:36 PM Resident 10 reported her/his toenails were long and uncomfortable and asked to have her/his toenails trimmed but nobody had done so since her/his admission. Resident 10 was observed to have several long, dark…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for discomfort. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 30's 1/6/23 Annual MDS indicated the resident used supplemental oxygen. Resident 30's health record included a 3/2023 physician order for the following: - Change oxygen tubing, humidification bottle and clean filter every night shift, every Monday for comfort. Oxygen on one to four liters per nasal cannula to keep O2 sats above 90%; - Document O2 sats and liters per minute every day and night shift for comfort. On 3/6/23 at 2:57 PM Resident 30 was lying in bed in her/his room and receiving oxygen which was produced and delivered from an oxygen concentrator. A humidifier bottle was attached to the concentrator and contained no fluid. A nasal cannula and tubing was attached to the oxygen concentrator and placed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received dialysis services consistent with the care plan for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for potential complications in dialysis care and treatment. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 10/2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dialysis. The 11/13/22 care plan revealed the following: -Focus: needs hemodialysis related to end stage renal failure; -Goal: will have no signs or symptoms of complications from dialysis through the review date; -Interventions: check and change dressing daily at access site, document. Monitor vital signs, notify MD of significant abnormalities. Monitor/document/report PRN any signs or symptoms of infection to access site: redness, swelling, warmth or drainage. The 3/2023 TAR indicated: Complete the dialysis post-assessment form after resident returns from dialysis. Ensure resident returns from dialysis with the Pre-Dialysis Assessment and Communication Form. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to identify potential trauma and monitor psychosocial distress for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#54) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs. Findings include: Resident 54 admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses which included major depression. Resident 54's [DATE] admission MDS indicated she/he had a BIMS of 15 (cognitively intact). A [DATE] facility investigation indicated Resident 54 was sexually abused by Witness 3 (Medical Transportaion Driver). On [DATE] an investigation was initiated, and sexual abuse was substantiated by Staff 1 (Administrator). Staff 1's report revealed Staff 30 (LPN) placed Resident 54 on alert for psychosocial distress. A [DATE] at 5:18 PM a progress note revealed Resident 54 reported she/he felt worried, she/he was not in distress and staff would continue to monitor. A [DATE] at 3:58 PM a progress note revealed Resident 54 was in good spirits with no signs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 8 sampled residents (#167) reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medication and hospitalization. Findings include: Resident 167 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, atrial fibrillation and stroke. Resident 167 discharged on 6/6/22. The 5/26/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 167 was cognitively intact. Resident 167's 6/2022 MARs indicated she/he received the following morning medications on 6/5/22: -Aspirin 81 mg (antiplatelet medication) -Breo Ellipta Aerosol powder (bronchodilator medication) -Combivent Respimat aerosol solution (bronchodilator medication) -Eplerenone 25 mg (antihypertensive medication) -Lasix 40 mg (diuretic medication) -lisinopril 10 mg (antihypertensive medication) -Pacerone 100 mg (antiarrhythmic medication) -potassium chloride ER 20 mEQ (supplement medication)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to store treatment supplies in locked compartments for 1 of 1 treatment cart on 500 hall observed. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: On 3/6/23 at 4:24 PM an unlocked treatment cart was observed on the 500 hall. Between 3/6/23 at 4:24 PM and 4:40 PM one resident and seven staff were observed to pass near the unlocked treatment cart. On 3/6/23 at 4:41 PM Staff 30 (LPN) was located at the nurses station and brought to the treatment cart. She confirmed the cart was unlocked and stated the cart should have been locked. Staff 30 confirmed needles, medications and treatment supplies were in the unlocked cart. On 3/7/23 at 8:24 AM an unlocked treatment cart was observed on the 500 hall. Between 3/7/23 at 8:24 AM and 8:40 AM six staff and two visitors passed near the unlocked treatment cart. On 3/7/23 at 8:40 AM the surveyor was not able to find the nurse responsible for the unlocked treatment cart. Staff 33 (CMA) confirmed the treatment cart was unlocked. On 3/10/23 at 9:55 AM Staff 3 (DNS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff wore and used PPE correctly for 1 of 1 COVID unit reviewed for infection control. This placed residents and staff at risk for respiratory illnesses and infections. Findings include: On 3/8/23 at 8:46 AM Staff 26 (CNA) was observed to retrieve a tray of food from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff 26 retrieved a spoon from the medication cart and handed it to Staff 35 (CNA) who was in a COVID isolation room, then answered the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff 26 then walked to assist a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]B who was on aerosol precautions. Staff 26 did not perform any hand hygiene during the observation period. At 9:00 AM Staff 26 stated she should have performed hand hygiene before entering and exiting the room and in between each resident contact. On 3/9/23 at 8:40 AM Staff 27 (CNA) was observed walking in the COVID unit hallway with a N95 face mask on her chin and goggles on top her head. She stated she was going on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,852 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $36,852 — penalty dated 2024-10-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-14 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VOLARE HEALTH — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PAC 12 OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2023
KNOX HEALTHCARE PAC 12 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2023
PAC 12 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2023
PAC 12 PINNACLE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2023
HAGLER, ALEXANDERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2023
KNOX, DONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2023
GRANTS PASS PROPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
SMITH, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2023
VOLARE HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
COSSELL, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
KAHN, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2023
SCHWARTZ, ELIEZERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HAGAR, CHAIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 46%Medicare 14%Other / private 40%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$570per resident / day
operating cost
$17,316per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$597per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385149. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next