Royale Gardens Health & Rehabilitation Center
2075 NW Highland Avenue, Grants Pass, OR 97526 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (541) 476-8891 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0604) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $182,193 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-13)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 4.9% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.4% | 20.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.1% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 5.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.0% | 21.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.7% | 81.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.3% | 21.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.0% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.48 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.65 | 2.35 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.7%CMS range 45.9–61.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.5–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.9–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 67.7 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.38 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.18 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer antibiotics for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#78) reviewed for hospitalization. As a result, Resident 78 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of UTI. Findings include: Resident 78 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with a diagnosis of cancer. Resident 78's Progress Notes revealed the following:-1/6/26 Resident 78 had yellow/pink tinged urine in her/his Foley catheter drainage bag. Orders were received to hold Resident 78's blood thinner and blood work was to be obtained. -1/7/26 Resident 78's physician History and Physical Note revealed Resident 78 had cancer, and Resident 78 reported she/he hoped to live one year so she/he could return home. Resident 78 reported she/he did not want heroic effects and would elect hospice services if outlook was futile. -1/8/26 Resident 78's Foley catheter drained dark red urine. -1/9/26 Resident 78 had 500 ccs of bloody urine, she/he was alert and oriented, and she/he was transported to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Resident 78's 1/9/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-25 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from involuntary seclusion by facility administration for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 12) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in Resident 12 experiencing psychosocial harm with suicidal ideation, increased depression symptoms, heightened anxiety, and fear of losing her/his home. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 11/2015 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), contractures of the right and left hand, right elbow, and lower extremities (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin which prevents normal movement of the body part) and a history of traumatic brain injury. Resident 12 was dependent on a power wheelchair for her/his mobility. Resident 12's care plan dated 11/17/2020 indicated the resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to quadriplegia and contractures in both upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on two staff for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 12) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in Resident 12 experiencing psychosocial harm with suicidal ideation, increased depression symptoms, heightened anxiety, and fear of losing her/his home. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), contractures of the right and left hand, right elbow, and lower extremities (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin which prevents normal movement of the body part), and a history of traumatic brain injury. Resident 12 was dependent on a power wheelchair for her/his mobility. Resident 12's care plan dated 11/17/2020 indicated the resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to quadriplegia and contractures in both upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on two staff for assistance with bed mobility, toilet use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined facility staff failed to provide necessary treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 6 developed an unstageable (wound covered by necrotic (dead) tissue or thick, brown or black scab or crust that covers the wound) ulcer on 12/20/23. Findings include: The facility's policy and guidelines for Skin Integrity dated 3/2023, stated the facility would provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the healing of pressure ulcers or injuries and individualized interventions would be implemented to prevent development of pressure ulcers or injuries. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 9/8/23 with diagnosis including Sepsis (an overall body infection which can be life threatening). Resident 6's initial nursing assessment noted she/he had wounds on her/his left hand, both thighs, right side of her/his face and pink skin above her/his coccyx (the small bone located above the sacral area, which is the area on the back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent a fall with significant injury for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for falls and the facility failed to ensure appropriate mechanical lift equipment was available for transferring bariatric residents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for accidents. The failure to prevent falls resulted in Resident 4 sustaining a fall with a fractured hip and required hospitalization. Both failures placed residents and staff at risk for falls and significant injuries. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a right hip fracture, unspecified dementia and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots). A 9/13/23 hospital discharge orders revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a right hip fracture and required surgical repair on 9/5/23. The orders indicated activity instructions were weight bearing as tolerated on the right lower leg. A 9/13/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined facility staff failed to ensure professional standards were followed related to pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 1 developed a Stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone) pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fractured leg. A 6/1/23 physician order indicated Resident 1 was to wear a knee immobilizer to the non-weight bearing right lower extremity at all times. On 6/2/23 Resident 1 was sent to the ER for pain control due to a leg fracture. The hospital History and Physical document indicated the resident had a pressure ulcer on the lateral (outside) of the right ankle. The hospital did not order treatment for the pressure ulcer. Resident 1 returned to the facility on 6/2/23. There was no documentation in Resident 1's in clinical record related to the pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed provide necesssary treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 1 developing a Stage 4 (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone) pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right leg fracture. A 6/1/23 physician order indicated Resident 1 was to always wear a knee immobilizer to the non-weight bearing right lower extremity. On 6/2/23 Resident 1 was sent to the ER for pain control due to the leg fracture. The hospital History and Physical indicated the resident had a pressure ulcer on the lateral (outside) of the right ankle. On 7/8/23 a Wound and Skin Evaluation created by Staff 14 (LPN-Unit Manager) indicated Resident 1 had a new Stage 4 pressure ulcer to the right lateral malleolus (bony prominence on the side of the ankle). This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was kept in a sanitary manner in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include:On 3/11/26 at 12:19 PM, during an observation of the kitchen, a swamp cooler located above the stove and food preparation area had a visible buildup of dust. A black pipe extending from the ceiling near the swamp cooler appeared greasy with dust accumulation. On 3/11/26 at 12:20 PM, Staff 29 (District Manager) and Staff 30 (Dietary Manager) confirmed the swamp cooler should have been clean.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure their call light communication system functioned independently for each resident in a shared room for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 14, 22, 61, and 68) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include:1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 1/2021 with diagnoses including pain.On 3/10/26 at 3:44 PM, Staff 32 (CNA) tested Resident 14's call light. When Staff 32 turned off Resident 14's call light, the roommate's call light also turned off.2. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including pain and repeated falls.The 12/19/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 22 was cognitively intact.On 3/9/26 at 12:31 PM, Resident 22 stated it took staff approximately 20 minutes to answer her/his call light. Resident 22 stated she/he believed something was wrong with her/his call light because it would shut off by itself. Resident 22 further stated she/he reported this to staff; however, no follow-up occurred.On 3/10/26 at 3:42 PM, Staff 32 (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident and resident representative were included in the care planning process for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for insufficient involvement in care decisions. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including brain damage and heart failure. A 10/17/23 legal Petition for Appointment or a Temporary Guardian and Permanent Guardian of An Adult revealed Witness 2 (Family Member) was Resident 5's legal guardian. A 2/17/25 IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Care Plan Conference/Welcome Meeting Form revealed Resident 5 and Witness 2 attended the meeting and were involved in the care planning development. The 11/17/25 Annual MDS indicated Resident 5 was unable to participate in her/his BIMS assessment. On 3/9/26 at 2:52 PM, Witness 2 stated he was not included in any recent care planning process and had questions about Resident 5's therapy and nutrition. On 3/10/26 at approximately 4:30 PM, Staff 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for an adverse medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 5/2020 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 10's 8/11/23 Self-Administration of Medication form revealed Resident 10 wanted to self-administer medications, did not have visual impairment, was alert and oriented, and was assessed to be safe to self-administer mediations. The form did not list which medications Resident 10 was safe to administer. Resident 10's 2/28/26 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 10's 3/2026 MAR revealed she/he was able to self-administer artificial tears BID. The MAR also revealed Resident 10 administered the medication BID. On 3/9/26 at 1:00 PM, observation revealed fluconazole (an antifungal medication) nasal spray, an over the counter hair growth supplement, an over the counter weight loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received showers for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor hygiene. Findings include: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including a below knee amputation of the right leg and a diabetic ulcer of the left foot.A 12/31/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 36 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14. A 1/5/26 Care Plan for Resident 36 lacked information regarding bathing/showering. On 3/9/26 at 2:22 PM, Resident 36 stated she/he did not receive showers as frequently as was her/his preference, and she/he was told by CNAs this was due to lack of staff to help with showers.The Kardex (abbreviated care plan for CNAs) as of 3/10/26 for Resident 36 did not include the level of assistance required by Resident 36 for bathing.According to the Documentation Survey Report for 2/2026 and 3/2026, Resident 36 received three out of eight showers during the month of 2/2026. On 3/11/26 at 9:24 AM, Resident 36 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record it was determined the facility failed to provide meaningful activities for a dependent resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for activities. This place residents at risk for lack of social interaction and isolation. Findings include:Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including brain damage and heart failure. The 11/17/25 Annual MDS indicated Resident 5 was unable to participate in her/his BIMS assessment and her/his activity preferences were completed by staff. Staff indicated Resident 5 liked to listen to music and attend group activities. The Activities CAA revealed appropriate activities were needed to help protect the resident from social isolation and loneliness. A 2/27/26 revised Care Plan indicated Resident 5 required assistance to activity functions, she/he preferred to socialize with staff members and was able to sit in her/his chair to watch movies. Resident 5's preferred activities including watching comedy in her/his chair. Resident 5's care plan did not indicate any music as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate ROM services for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 45) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for compromised mobility and pain. Findings include:1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including brain damage and heart failure. A 4/30/24 Restorative Nursing Program Plan indicated Resident 5's restorative treatment was to occur one to three times each week and interventions included bilateral upper and lower extremity exercises to her/his shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee and ankle. The 11/17/25 Annual MDS indicated Resident 5 was unable to participate in her/his BIMS assessment and received ROM services for five out of seven days during the review period with no therapy services. The 1/1/26 through 3/8/26 Restorative Program log for Resident 5 revealed from 1/10/26 through 1/20/26 (11 days) and 2/15/26 through 2/21/26 (seven days) ROM services were NA (not available). The 2/17/26 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 5 received ROM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure x-rays were obtained timely for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 5/2020 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 10's Progress Notes revealed the following:-11/4/25 staff responded to Resident 10's call for help. Resident 78 was found on the floor and reported bilateral feet pain. knee pain, and hip pain. The note indicated x-rays were obtained. Resident 10's 11/4/26 Order Details revealed left ankle, right ankle, left toes, right toes, left knee, right knee, hips and pelvic x-rays were orders. Resident 10's clinical record revealed results of her/his 11/4/25 right foot/ankle x-rays results were not in her/his clinical record. Resident 10's Progress notes revealed the following: -11/7/25 Resident 10 had bruising and swelling to her/his right foot.-11/9/25 Resident 10 was offered to be transported to the hospital for evaluation but declined.-11/11/25 Resident 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's clinical record accurately reflected the resident's resuscitation wishes for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#44) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for not having their resuscitation choices followed. Findings include: Resident 44 was admitted to the facility [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed a POLST (Portable Order of Life-Sustaining Treatment) dated [DATE] indicating the resident elected a designation of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR).A review of the resident's IDT Care Plan Conference revealed the resident elected to be designated as DNR.A review of the resident's Clinical Resident Profile revealed the resident was to receive CPR. On [DATE] at 6:55 AM, Staff 11 (LPN) stated nurses are responsible for entering the resident's CPR/DNR status into the residents' clinical record. Staff 11 confirmed Resident 8's Clinical Resident Profile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drinks were stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 resident refrigerators and failed to ensure water dispensers were properly sanitized for 1 of 1 water dispensers observed. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination. Findings include:1. On 1/16/26, the State Survey Agency received a public complaint indicating the filtered water stations had pink slime and were not replaced or cleaned. On 1/27/26 at 8:11 AM, the water dispenser across the hall from the main nurses' station was observed with an orangish buildup on the cold-water outlet and a gray to black buildup on the hot-water outlet. On 1/27/26 at 10:17 AM, Staff 8 (LPN) confirmed both water outlets on the dispenser had a buildup on the ends. On 1/28/26 at 8:44 AM, Staff 40 (Housekeeping Manager) stated the housekeeping department was responsible for cleaning and sanitizing the outside of the dispenser but not the outlets or the inside of the dispenser. On 1/28/26 at 9:19 AM Staff 44 (Maintenance Director) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to inform the resident prior to the initiation of a psychotropic medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3). This placed residents at risk for not being informed of the side effects of a medication and not participating in their treatment. Findings include:Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with a diagnosis of seizures. Resident 3's Physician Order Details revealed she/he was administered the following psychotropic medications between 2/12/25 and 6/16/25:- Asenapine (prescribed to treat bipolar disorder)- Buspirone (prescribed to treat anxiety).- Lamotrigine (prescribed for seizures (can also be used for bipolar)). - Abilify (prescribed to treat bipolar). There was no documented evidence to show the resident was informed of the side effects of these medications prior to being administered.On 7/21/25 at 11:48 AM, Staff 14 (SSD) confirmed Resident 3 was not informed for the listed medications prior to the medication being administered. 7/23/25 at 10:45 AM, Staff 16 (Administrator), Staff 15 (DNS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 6) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for mental anguish and abuse. Findings include:Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2024, with diagnoses including diabetes and below the knee amputation.Resident 6's 6/25/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 6 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 2023, with diagnosis including cognitive communication deficit. Resident 7's 6/10/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 7 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.On 6/16/25 a public complaint was filed which alleged Resident 7 made sexual contact with Resident 6 with a food item. On 7/16/25 at 9:47 AM, Resident 7 stated she/he gestured toward Resident 6 with a doughnut. Resident 7 did not recall saying anything afterward. Resident 7 stated Resident 6 had avoided her/him since the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to ensure timely incontinent care and resident showers were completed for 6 of 6 sampled residents (#s 5, 8, 12, 14, 15, and 16) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: The facility's 1/2025 Resident Council Notes revealed concerns related to short staffing and having care needs met. The facility's 3/2025 Resident Council Notes revealed resident showers were not completed as scheduled. Review of the assigned showers on 4/20/25 revealed Resident 5, Resident 12, Resident 14, Resident 15, and Resident 16 did not receive their showers. The CNA staff documented, not attempted due to environmental limitations, refused, or NA. Resident 8's 4/2025 Shower Record revealed she/he did not receive a shower on 4/23/25 and 4/25/25. On 4/30/25 at 5:40 PM, Resident 8 stated the facility was often short staffed, call lights were not answered timely and she/he did not always get her/his scheduled showers. On 4/30/25 at 6:00 PM, Staff 18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to treat, assess, and monitor wounds for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 101, 102, and 103) reviewed for wound care. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds and infections. Findings include: 1. Resident 101 admitted to the facility on 2/2025, with diagnoses including mononeuropathy of the bilateral lower limbs (damage or dysfunction of two or more peripheral nerves in both legs), second degree burns of the right foot (2nd and 3rd toes) and second degree burns to the left foot and toes. Resident 101's 2/13/25 Hospital Discharge Orders indicated to continue local dressing changes daily with Xeroform and a dry sterile dressing. Resident 101's 2/13/25 Nursing Admission/readmission Evaluation included the following skin observation: -Right toe(s): burns, blisters -Left toe(s): burns, blisters No additional information related to the wounds was found such as: description, measurements, which toes were involved, or the condition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the effectiveness of interventions and provide adequate resident supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#s 102) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for recurring falls. Findings include: Resident 102 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including dementia, and repeated falls. Resident 102 had a BIMS score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident had a total of 27 falls during the two months she/he was at the facility. Resident 102's care plan dated 9/30/2024 indicated the resident was a two person extensive assist with bathing/showering, transferring, and locomotion. Resident 102's 10/7/24 Fall Risk Care Plan instructed staff to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, keep the call light within reach, encourage use of the call light, educate the resident about safety reminders, ensure commonly used items were within reach, wear appropriate footwear, keep the bed in a low position,and a PT consult for strength and mobility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a sanitary kitchen environment for 1 of 1 facility kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: An 10/2024 Sanitizer Bucket Log indicated the facility's Multi-Quat Sanitizer had a broad efficacy range of 150-400 PPM (parts per million), staff were to complete testing of the sanitizer levels a minimum of every four hours and more often as needed, and to keep the water clean to keep the sanitizer in use effective. On 10/25/24 at 9:23 AM Staff 47 (Dietary Aide) was observed to sanitize a soiled dish cart with a rag that was removed from a red bucket and contained sanitizing solution. The rag and sanitizing solution was observed to contain black flecks. Staff 47 was asked to test the concentration of the sanitizer in the bucket and confirmed the sanitizer solution used to sanitize the soiled dish cart was ineffective at 100 PPM. Staff 47 indicated the sanitizer in the bucket was changed every four hours. On 10/25/24 at approximately 9:30 AM Staff 37…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 9/10/23 admission MDS revealed Resident 52 was cognitively intact but was not assessed for activity preferences. Resident 52 was identified to be at risk for social isolation, depression, and had blindness to both eyes. The assessment also indicated Resident 52 preferred to visit with her/his significant other. Activities/Recreation reviews revealed the following: -12/23/23 Resident 52 participated in 1:1 activities and her/his favorite activity was smoking outside with others. There was no identified activity goal or focus. -3/13/24 Resident 52 participated in 1:1 activities and enjoyed to smoke with others. There was no identified goals or focus. -6/23/24 Resident 52 reported she/he felt staff did not allow visits with her/his significant other and reported she/he could not do anything because she/he was going blind. The form indicated the resident used to like audio books. New interventions included to offer audio books.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer bowel care and follow therapy recommendations for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 30, 70 and 191) reviewed for pressure ulcers, and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including stroke and heart disease. A 9/26/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 8 required setup assistance for eating. An 10/15/24 revised care plan indicated Resident 8 required extensive assistance of one staff for eating, and to encourage the resident to sit upright after meals. An 10/18/24 Occupational Therapy Treatment Encounter Note indicated therapy staff spoke to nursing to ensure Resident 8 was in her/his wheelchair for all meals and communication would be provided to CNAs. On 10/21/24 at 1:35 PM Resident 8 was observed sitting in her/his bed with her/his head in a slouched position. A meal was on a bedside table in front of the resident. Witness 8 (Family Member) stated she spoke with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was reviewed and signed by a physician for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 2, 29, 31, and 35) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for unassessed medical needs and adverse side effects of medication. Findings Include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including arthritis and heart disease. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record on 10/28/24, a physician signed plan of care was not found for 1/2023 through 12/2023, 1/2024 through 3/2024, 5/2024, and 6/2024. On 10/28/24 at 4:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 52 (Regional Director of Clinical Services) stated no further physician signed plans of care were available, and acknowledged the months without physician signed plans of care in Resident 2's clinical record. 2. Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including breast cancer and diabetes. During a review of Resident 29's clinical record on 10/28/24, a physician signed plan of care was not found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician every 60 days for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 2, 29, 31, and 35) reviewed for physician visits. This placed residents at risk for unmet medical needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including arthritis and heart disease. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record on 10/28/24, no physician visit notes were found for 1/2024 through 3/2024, 5/2024, 6/2024, and 8/2024. On 10/28/24 at 4:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 52 (Regional Director of Clinical Services) stated no further physician visit notes were available, and acknowledged there was no evidence to indicate Resident 2 had a physician visit every 60 days relative to the above timeframes. 2. Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including breast cancer and diabetes. During a review of Resident 29's clinical record on 10/28/24, no physician visit notes were found after 4/2023. On 10/28/24 at 4:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were five errors out of 44 medication administration opportunities resulting in a 11.36 percent error rate. This placed residents at risk for an ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: 1. Resident 21 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with a diagnoses including respiratory failure. An 10/7/24 physician order indicated staff were to administer Advair powder inhaler, inhale one puff and then rinse her/his mouth after each administration. On 10/23/24 at 8:37 AM Staff 36 (CMA) handed Resident 21 her/his inhaler and the resident inhaled twice, but she/he did not rinse her/his mouth after the medication administration. On 10/23/24 at 8:40 AM Resident 21 stated she/he inhaled the medication twice but did not rinse her/his mouth after the medication administration. On 10/23/24 at 8:45 AM Staff 36 stated the resident should inhale the medication one time then rinse her/his mouth after inhaling the medication. On 10/24/24 at 2:50 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident needs for 1 of 6 sampled residents ( #49) reviewed for environment and speech. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 49 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Aphasia (a disorder in speaking and understanding language). On 10/21/24 at 11:32 AM, an interview with Resident 49 revealed her/his verbal communication was severely impaired (nonverbal with the use of pointing and gestures). At that time Staff 5 (CNA) reported Resident 49 often confused no for yes which decreased staff's understanding of how to meet Resident 49's communication and care needs. Staff 5 confirmed there was no picture communication board for Resident 49 to point to for more specific requests and communication. On 10/22/24 at 12:41 PM, Staff 3 (speech therapist and clinical supervisor) confirmed three separate speech therapy evaluations, dated 6/30/23, 12/30/23, and 6/27/24, were conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' grievances were addressed for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 52 and 70) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unresolved grievances. Findings include: 1. Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 9/10/24 annual MDS revealed Resident 52 was cognitively intact. A 7/3/24 Grievance Report revealed Resident 52 reported a missing or misplaced heavy jacket. The grievance indicated staff looked in laundry but the jacket was not found. There was no resolution to the missing jacket. On 10/21/24 12:58 PM Resident 52 stated she/he was missing a heavy jacket and there was no follow-up. On 10/22/24 at 12:23 PM Staff 53 (CNA) stated Resident 52 reported a missing jacket and it was sentimental to her/him because a friend gifted it to her/him. On 10/24/24 at 11:54 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged there was no resolution for the missing jacket. On 10/25/24 at 10:32 AM Staff 27 (Social Services Director) stated if a resident was missing clothing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a report of misappropriation was reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 52's 9/10/24 annual MDS revealed Resident 52 was cognitively intact. A 7/3/24 Grievance Report revealed Resident 52 was missing or misplaced a wallet. The investigation revealed Resident 52 reported money was missing from her/his bank account. A police report was filed. On 10/24/24 at 11:54 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated an allegation of a missing wallet and money could be misappropriation. Staff 2 stated social services filed a police report on behalf of Resident 52 but a FRI was not submitted.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred to the state agency authority for Level II PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review: assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness) evaluation for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#52) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents at risk for lack of mental health services. Findings include: Resident 52 admitted to the facility from another facility on 9/2023 with a diagnosis of mental illness. A 9/10/23 admission MDS revealed Resident 52 was not administered antidepressants or mood stabilizing medications and she/he was at risk for ongoing social isolation and depression. A plan was to refer Resident 52 to behavioral health services. 9/2023, 10/2023 and 11/2023 MARs and DARs (Diabetic Administration Records) revealed Resident 52 accepted medications and allowed CBG testing. 12/2023, 1/2024 and 2/2024 MARs and DARs revealed Resident 52 refused to take certain medications, cooperate by providing pain levels, and allow staff to obtain CBGs. Progress Notes revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#s 24 and 243) reviewed for accidents and discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes with complications including high blood sugar levels. 9/24/24 hospital Discharge orders revealed Resident 24 was admitted for diabetic ketoacidosis (a complication of diabetes in which acids build up in the blood to levels that can be life threatening) and was discharged to the facility with insulin orders. Resident 24's baseline care plan initiated 9/24/24 did not include Resident 24 was diabetic with history of high blood sugar levels, symptoms to monitor, and interventions to provide if needed. On 10/24/24 at 12:52 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated when a resident was discharged to the hospital her/his care plan was discontinued and a new care plan was initiated upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to involve residents and/or representatives in the care planning process for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk for lack of care plan interventions. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including stroke. A 9/25/24 through 10/22/24 (CNA) Task: Shower/Bathe Self Saturday and Wednesday document indicated Resident 8 refused or did not receive bathing for six of nine opportunities. A 9/26/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 8 was moderately cognitively impaired. The 10/4/24 IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Care Plan Conference/Welcome Meeting Form indicate Resident 8 was present but Witness 8 (Family Member) was not present during a discussion of Resident 8's care needs. The 10/22/24 contact list for Resident 8 indicated Witness 8 was her/his first emergency contact and POA (Power of Attorney) for care. On 10/21/24 at 3:44 PM Witness 8 stated because of Resident 8's memory issues, the resident wanted her involved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 31 and 240) reviewed for ADLs. This placed resident at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 31 admitted to the facility in 8/2018 with diagnoses including stroke and dementia. An 8/23/24 MDS revealed Resident 31's BIMS score was seven which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident 31 required substantial to maximal assistance with toilet transfers and was dependent on staff for assistance with toileting hygiene. Resident 31 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. The urinary incontinence CAA indicated Resident 31 required significant assistance with most ADLs. Resident 31 was at risk for complications resulting from bowel and bladder incontinence. Staff were to provide assistance with toileting and incontinence, frequent checks and assistance with incontinent care, and to encourage toileting independence as safely able. A review of Resident 31's care plan revised 2/23/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess, care plan, implement, follow and maintain pressure ulcer treatments and care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#191) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 191 developing an avoidable unstageable (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident 191 admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including kidney failure. The 6/17/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 191 had pressure ulcer and was at risk for pressure ulcers due to incontinence and decreased mobility. Resident 191 admitted with a Stage 2 (shallow open wound) pressure ulcer to the coccyx. A public compliant was received on 6/25/24 which indicated Resident 191 discharged from the hospital on 6/12/24 with a Stage 2 (shallow open wound with red or pink base) pressure ulcer on her/his coccyx (tailbone) measuring 2 cm by 0.1 cm. Resident 191 returned to the hospital on 6/19/24 with worsening wounds to her/his coccyx. The 6/27/24 care plan indicated Resident 191 had potential for skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident received trauma informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (52) reviewed for behavioral-emotional care. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility 9/2023 with a diagnosis of a mental health illness. A [DATE] Psychosocial History revealed Resident 52 had trauma related to a child's death and had nightmares about the incident. A [DATE] annual MDS revealed Resident 52 was cognitively intact. A [DATE] Grievance Summary Report revealed staff assisted Resident 52 with a shower. Resident 52 agreed to have her/his beard shaved. The CNA started to shave Resident 52's mustache. Resident 52 stated the CNA was in a hurry to leave the room after the shower and shave. A [DATE] Statement form revealed Staff 51(CNA) offered to shower Resident 52, shave her/his beard, and trim her/his hair. Resident 52 agreed and Staff started to shave her/his mustache. Halfway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 1 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#35) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: During a review of the most recent performance reviews for CNA staff no documentation was provided for Staff 35 (CNA) who was hired on 5/22/22. On 10/29/24 Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed there was no performance review for Staff 35.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide timely pharmaceutical services for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 198, 21, and 78) reviewed for medication administration, and failed to ensure narcotic medication management systems were in place to account for and reconcile narcotics for 2 of 5 narcotic books reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for untimely medications and diversion. Findings include: 1. Resident 198 admitted to the facility in 10/11/24 with a history of seizures. The 10/2024 MAR instructed staff to administer lacosamide (antiseizure medication) two times a day for seizures, with a start date of 10/11/24. From 10/11/24 through 10/21/24 the MAR referred the reader to progress notes. Administration Notes revealed the following for lacosamide administrations: -10/11/24 waiting for delivery. -10/12/24 at 7:37 AM waiting for medication delivery. -10/12/24 at 7:17 PM the medication was unavailable. -10/13/24 at 8:44 AM the medication was unavailable. -10/14/24 at 10:01 AM an Administration Note revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor a resident on a psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#85) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident 85 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. The 9/30/24 admission MDS and CAA indicated Resident 85 was severely cognitively impaired and had multiple falls prior to admission and within the facility. An 10/7/24 physician order indicated to administer trazodone (antidepressant medication) to Resident 85 at bedtime for insomnia. An 10/16/24 Psychotropic Medication Review indicated Resident 85 was a new admission and her/his trazodone would be monitored to establish baseline. There was no indication for the use of trazodone for Resident 85. An 10/22/24 revised care plan revealed no indication Resident 85 had insomnia or received medication to address her/his sleep. On 10/24/24 at 8:57 PM Staff 54 (LPN) stated Resident 85 was difficult to arouse in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided dental services for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for dental pain. Findings include: Resident 30 admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 9/5/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 30 was cognitively intact. On 10/23/24 at 11:28 AM Resident 30 was observed to have a missing left upper tooth. Resident 30 stated Witness 6 (Family Member) visited about one month prior and noticed her/his tooth was broken. Resident 30 stated the tooth fragment remained in her/his gums. On 10/23/24 12:19 PM Witness 6 stated in 9/2024 she visited Resident 30 and asked her/him What's up with your tooth? Witness 6 stated she notified one of the CNAs who was in Resident 30's room about the newly identified broken tooth. Shortly after she visited Resident 30 a dental office called her to set up an appointment for Resident 30's tooth. Witness 6 stated she informed the dental office to call the facility to set up the appointment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to follow modified textured diets as ordered for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for food. This place residents at risk for medical complications and aspiration. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including stroke and intestinal obstruction. A 9/26/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 8 required set-up assistance for eating. A 9/29/24 Order Details revealed Resident 8's diet texture was an Easy to Chew texture. An 10/21/24 Lunch Day 23 Diet Guide instructed staff to serve minced dijon pork loin with brown gravy for Easy to Chew and Soft and Bite Size diet textures. Staff were also instructed to serve bite-sized moistened citrus glazed angel food cake for Soft and Bite Size diet textures. On 10/21/24 at 1:36 PM Resident 8 stated she/he often did not receive the modified textured diet as ordered. Resident 8's partially eaten plate of food was observed which included one-inch cubed pieces of cooked pork with no gravy as part of her/his meal. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide assistive devices for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet dining needs. Findings include: Resident 242 admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety and catatonic schizophrenia (subtype of schizophrenia characterized by extreme changes in motor activity). A revised care plan dated 8/26/24 indicated Resident 15 had a nutritional problem and need for assistance with food and fluids. Interventions included Resident 15 was to be provided a non-weighted built-up spoon with each meal. On 10/22/24 at 8:09 AM Resident 15 was in the dining room and was eating her/his breakfast with her/his hands. On 10/23/24 at 11:54 AM Resident 15 was in the dining room and was provided a spoon which was not a non-weighted built-up spoon. At 12:01 PM Staff 11 (CNA) stated CNAs did not have access to the resident's specialized equipment and confirmed the kitchen did not provide Resident 15 the non-weighted built-up spoon for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain adequate room temperatures and a home like environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for comfortable and homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for an uncomfortable and un-homelike environment. Findings include: 1. OAR §483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and Safe Temperature Levels: indicated facilities must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F; and the ambient temperature should be in a relatively narrow range to minimize residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia, or hyperthermia, and comfortable for the residents. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and bi-polar disorder (disorder with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). On 11/27/23 Resident 13 reported to hospital staff her/his room at the facility was cold and did not get any heat. On 1/8/24 at 1:45 PM Staff 6 (Maintenance Manager) indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders, and failed to identify and address a resident's change of condition for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 2, 10 and 11) reviewed for physician orders and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for lack of care and treatment and negative medical outcomes related to delayed treatment. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including paralysis due to stroke. Resident 10's care plan indicated she/he was admitted to the facility with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer on the sacrum (the area between the right and left hip bones) and another Stage 4 ulcer on the lower right buttock due to immobility, poor food and fluid intake. Resident 10 also had wounds on her/his left and right lower legs. Interventions ordered were to cleanse the large coccyx (the small bone located below the sacrum) which forms the wound with wound cleanser/saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate to the wound bed and apply sacral foam dressing daily and PRN. Orders for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor resident care equipment for 4 of 4 halls (A, B, F and G Halls) and failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a safe and functional condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs, accidents, injury and food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. A public complaint was received on 11/16/23 which alleged the facility's crash cart (cabinet containing supplies for medical emergencies), located on A Hall, was not monitored by staff twice a week. On 1/8/24 at 12:27 PM Witness 8 (Complainant) stated the crash cart contained vital medical equipment such as oxygen, a suction machine and other supplies. Witness 8 stated the last time she/he checked the cart it had been months since the log showed the cart had been checked. On 1/9/24 at 4:47 PM, the crash cart was observed in Hallway A. A log book was on top of the cart with Crash Cart Inventory/Audit Instructions attached to the log book. The instructions stated nursing staff were to check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a fall resulting in a serious bodily injury was reported to the State Agency for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for abuse/neglect. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a right hip fracture and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots). A 9/13/23 Incident Report revealed Resident 4 was found on the floor next to the bed in her/his room. The resident stated she/he was sitting on the bedside commode and tried to get up on her/his own and fell. The report revealed the resident reported intense left hip pain and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. A 9/13/23 ED (Emergency Department) visit note indicated X-rays confirmed the resident had a left hip fracture and the previous right hip fracture repair was intact. 9/16/23 hospital discharge orders revealed Resident 4 had left hip repair surgery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an injury of unknown origin for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, 4 and 14) reviewed for safe environment and falls. This placed residents at risk for potential abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses including a stroke. Review of a progress note dated 8/19/23 at 8:25 AM revealed the resident told staff that a night shift CNA had grabbed her/his arm during a transfer causing a bruise. The note indicated the CNA had not transferred the resident during the night shift. Review of an incident investigation dated 8/19/23 revealed Resident 1 told staff a night shift staff person had grabbed her/his arm during a transfer causing a bruise to the right inside arm. The investigation indicated the resident's care plan was followed, the incident was unavoidable and abuse and neglect was ruled out. The investigation did not include a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement the care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 12) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), contractures of the right and left hand, right elbow, and lower extremities (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin which prevents normal movement of the body part) and a history of traumatic brain injury. Resident 12 was dependent on a power wheelchair for her/his mobility. Resident 12's care plan dated 11/17/2020 indicated the resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to quadriplegia and contractures in both upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on two staff for assistance with bed mobility, toilet use and transferring. The resident was totally dependent on one staff for eating, filling a water cup and drinking fluids. Resident 12's care plan also included: -The resident had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for facility discharge. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. Review of a fax dated 10/24/23 revealed the facility requested physician orders for physical therapy, occupational therapy and home health for the resident's anticipated discharge to an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) on 10/25/23. Review of a Discharge Instructions/Orders form dated 10/24/23 revealed Resident 3 had diabetic medication training by the facility nursing staff. Review of a progress note dated 10/25/23 at 3:35 PM revealed the resident was discharged from the facility to the Assisted Living Facility (ALF) with instructions and medications. No discharge summary was created to include Resident 3 recapitulation of stay, functional status on discharge or the resident's discharge plan of care. In an interview on 1/9/24 at 2:24 PM Staff 1 (DNS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide catheter care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for unmet catheter needs. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso) and neurogenic bladder (lacking bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem.) Resident 12 was alert and oriented and able to direct her/his own care. On 1/8/24 Resident 12 said she/he woke up with her/his catheter plugged. For at least an hour she/he asked the CNAs to get the nurse but the nurse would not come. The resident felt she/he could not wait because she/he thought her/his body would go into shock since it had happened before. Resident 12 said Staff 22 (CNA) came in, saw she/he had been waiting over 40 minutes, she/he was not looking good, was in pain, so she went to get a nurse. The nurse finally came in but said she needed to assess the resident first, wanted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Resident 166 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including respiratory problems and pain. Resident 166's care plan dated 6/9/23 indicated she/he used smoking materials and the interventions were to instruct the resident on the facility policy for smoking, locations, times and safety. Resident 166's progress notes documented several incidents when the resident did not follow the smoking policy or left the facility to obtain beer. The care plan was not revised to indicate whether Resident 166 was an independent or supervised smoker, failed to comply with the facility's smoking policy or brought beer into the facility without a physician's order. On 7/14/23 at 12:01 PM Resident 166 was discussed with Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS). Staff 2 stated Resident 166 did not follow the smoking rules and was bringing beer into the facility without a physician's order. No additional information was provided. 3. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including weakness. On 5/24/23 Resident 1 had a fall, broke her/his leg and required a brace.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents for 3 of 4 Halls (A, G & F Halls) and 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. On 5/22/23 a public complaint was received which indicated Resident 18 reported the facility was short staffed and there was not enough staff to provide care for all of the residents. Resident 18's call light was on all night when she/he needed assistance and no staff responded until the day shift. A 6/7/23 Call light Audit Tool revealed the following call light wait times: -Room A-14 call light was activated at 8:07 AM and answered and 8:23 AM (16 minutes), and 8:32 AM and was answered at 8:53 AM. (21 minutes) -Room A-5 call light activated 8:09 AM and answered at 8:27 AM (18 minutes). On 6/28/23 a public complaint was received which indicated the facility was understaffed and residents did not receive the care they needed. Day shift had only two CNAs for 19 residents and all of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified and trained IP in place for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention and control. This placed residents at risk for inadequate infection control. Findings include: A Staff List provided on 7/10/23 indicated the facility had an IP. On 7/10/23 at 3:15 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the facility did not have a qualified IP working in the facility at least part time. Staff 2 stated she did not have specialized training for infection control. On 7/12/23 at 10:00 AM Staff 3 (Regional IP) stated she was not in the facility for the past year and would not be in the facility until 7/24/23. Staff 3 acknowledged the facility did not have an IP that worked at the facility at least part time.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with diagnoses including heart disease and a neurological disorder. An 4/17/23 care plan indicated Resident 46 required one staff to assist with locomotion. An 4/23/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 46 was cognitively intact and set-up assistance was required for dining. On 7/10/23 at 7:57 PM Witness 4 (Family Member) stated Resident 46 was left in the dining room after a meal and was later heard yelling after she/he became stuck in a corner of the dining room in her/his wheelchair when attemping to return to her/his room. On 7/11/23 at 9:46 AM Resident 46 recalled when she/he was left in the dining room and it made her/him feel small and insignificant but not abused. On 7/11/23 at 4:57 PM the details of the 7/11/23 interview with Resident 46 was shared with Staff 10 (Social Service Director).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were included in care planning for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed Resident 18 did not receive a care conference from 10/18/22 through 5/14/23. A review of Resident 18's care plan revealed on 2/22/23 and 3/3/23 Resident 18's care plan was updated. On 7/10/23 at 1:35 PM and 7/13/23 at 8:40 AM Resident 18 stated with dissatisfaction she/he and the facility met at care conferences about once a year but did not discuss her/his care planning in detail. Resident 18 stated she/he did not receive a copy of her/his care plan. Resident 18 stated with dissatisfaction she/he did not remember a representative from dietary services attending her/his care conferences. On 7/14/23 at 10:00 AM Staff 10 (Social Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess or assess timely for self-administration of medication for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 31 and 214) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions. Findings include: 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes. A 7/6/23 Nursing Note indicated Resident 31 woke up and checked her/his own blood sugar. A 7/6/23 Alert Note indicated Resident 31 was given cream for her/his groin area and was able to administer it by herself/himself. A 7/9/23 Alert Note indicated staff handed Resident 31 an insulin pen and dialed the insulin to 12 units for her/him to administer, as [she/he] usually does and Resident 31 changed the insulin pen to 18 units and administered the insulin. There was no assessment in the clinical record to indicate Resident 31 was evaluated to self-administer her/his medications. On 7/11/23 at 9:12 AM Resident 31 stated she/he always checked her/his own blood sugars. On 7/14/23 at 10:40 AM Staff 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' personal belongings were not searched without permission for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#166) reviewed for respect and dignity. This place residents at risk for lack of respect. Findings include: Resident 166 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including respiratory problems and pain. A nurses' note dated 6/23/23 indicated Staff 33 (former agency LPN) visualized a bag in Resident 166's room, opened the bag and saw a tall can of beer. Staff 33 informed Resident 166 of the need for an order to consume alcohol and removed the beer from the resident's room. On 7/13/23 at 2:12 PM Staff 33 stated she was informed in the morning meeting Resident 166 left the facility and when the resident returned, Staff 33 accompanied her/him to her/his room. Staff 33 indicated she was concerned the resident brought beer into the facility again without a physician's order. Staff 33 noticed a bag behind the trash can and picked it up, looked inside and discovered a tall can of beer. Staff 33 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident needs for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#21) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including difficulty walking and obesity. A 3/10/23 Social Services Note indicated Staff 10 (Social Services Director) spoke with Resident 21 about her/his previous request for a wheelchair and Resident 21 stated she/he did not wish to move forward at this time. A review of the clinical record revealed no additional information about Resident 21's wheelchair status after 3/10/23. A 5/18/23 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 21's BIMS score was 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The 6/10/23 care plan did not have any information about Resident 21's wheelchair. On 7/11/23 at 7:45 AM Resident 21 stated she/he did not have a wheelchair and she/he was not able to get out of bed except to shower. Resident 21 stated she/he wanted a larger wheelchair but it would not fit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bed hold information for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#61) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of information related to the right to hold their bed placement while in the hospital. Findings include: Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal fractures. Progress notes dated 6/13/23 and 6/14/23 revealed the resident called emergency transportation and went to the hospital because she/he reported lack of pain control. The resident's clinical record did not include documentation to indicate the resident was provided the bed hold policy. On 7/11/23 at 2:41 PM Staff 10 (Social Services) stated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and the resident was assessed to be cognitively intact. The bed hold policy was usually provided with admission paperwork. Staff 10 indicated she was not sure if Resident 61 received the bed hold policy. On 7/11/23 at 2:49 PM Staff 35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a care plan for catheters, anticoagulant medication and accidents for 1 of 9 sampled residents (#313) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 313 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including mood disorder and acute deep vein thrombosis (the formation of a blood clot within a blood vessel). The 6/2023 and 7/2023 MARs revealed Resident 313 received Eliquis (blood thinner medication) daily from 6/27/23 through 7/1/23 and 7/5/23 through 7/11/23. A 6/28/23 care plan revealed no reference to Resident 313's use of Eliquis. On 7/13/23 at 4:49 PM Staff 12 (LPN-Unit Manager) stated because Resident 313 had a recent bleed it was important for all staff to be aware of her/his use of Eliquis and acknowledged there was no reference to the use of blood thinner medication with the initial care plan.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement fall interventions and reevaluate a resident's smoking status for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 13 and 166) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: Resident 166 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including respiratory problems and pain. A 6/9/23 Smoking Policy review and evaluation indicated residents were not allowed to maintain their smoking materials, could not share their smoking materials with others and smoking materials must be secured by nursing staff. The evaluation indicated Resident 166 wore oxygen and demonstrated safe smoking behavior. An alert note dated 6/11/23 indicated Resident 166 was observed out in the smoking area with a cigarette and lighter. Resident 166 indicated the lighter was provided by another resident. Resident 166 relinquished the lighter and was educated on the need to turn in smoking materials. A 6/16/23 nursing note by the Staff 36 (Unit Manager) indicated Resident 166 was smoking while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#49) reviewed for respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including systemic inflammatory response syndrome (a condition where the body reacts to an infection with inflammation which affects the whole body.) A 3/11/23 care plan indicated Resident 49 had oxygen therapy with the goal not to have signs or symptoms of poor oxygen absorption with oxygenation saturation greater than (SPECIFY) (no specified amount was documented) through the review date. Interventions included Resident 49 was on oxygen. A 6/2023 TAR instructed staff to provide Resident 49 oxygen per nasal cannula zero to four liters to keep oxygen saturations greater than 90 percent as needed. There was no documentation Resident 49 was administered oxygen in 6/2023. The TAR also instructed staff to change the humidifier bottle every 28 days. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#314) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for lack of meal satisfaction and weight loss. Findings include: Resident 314 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including depression and high blood pressure. A 7/2/23 admission MDS indicated Resident 314 was cognitively intact. A 7/6/23 care plan indicated interventions for Resident 314's depression included involvement in her/his own decision making as much as possible. An undated Dietary Profile Form indicated Resident 314 received a regular texture diet and liked good vegetables. An undated Always Available Menu indicated Chef Salad, Tossed Salad and Grilled Cheese along with cold sandwiches were available. On 7/10/23 at 3:53 PM Resident 314 stated the general menu was limited and there was no discussion or detailed information regarding alternative food options since she/he admitted . Resident 314 stated she/he saw other residents with grilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 49 & 214) reviewed for respiratory and urinary catheter. This placed residents at risk for exposure to and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include: 1. Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure. A 5/16/23 revised care plan indicated Resident 49 had a catheter. Resident 49 required a mechanical lift with two-person assistance for transfers and one to two persons for bed mobility. On 7/12/23 at 7:32 AM Resident 49 was laying on her/his side in bed and her/his catheter bag was on the floor about two feet away from the bed with the privacy bag halfway off. On 7/13/23 at 7:34 AM Staff 25 (CNA) stated Resident 49 did not pull or move her/his own catheter bag and she/he did not get up on her/his own. On 7/14/23 at 12:45 Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 49's catheter bag should not be on the floor. 2. Resident 214 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 2 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 27 and 29) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 7/14/23 at 3:00 PM Staff 2 (DNS) provided documentation of all completed training and in-services for Staff 27 (CNA) and Staff 29 (CNA): -Staff 27 completed Essentials of HIPAA on 5/16/22 with no abuse or dementia training in the last 18 months. -Staff 29 did not have training documented since 2019. On 12/6/22 at 11:32 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the required 12 hours of annual in-service training was not completed for Staff 27 and Staff 29.
- No harm found · C2024-10-29 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: Observations of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) from 10/21/24 through 10/25/24 revealed the following: -10/21/24 at 11:52 AM no census was documented for day shift. -10/22/24 at 6:51 AM the 10/22/24 DCSDR was not posted. -10/23/24 at 8:09 AM the 10/23/24 DCSDR was not posted. -10/25/24 at 10:31 AM no census was documented for day shift. A review of the DCSDR from 10/1/24 through 10/20/24 revealed no census was documented on evening and night shift. On 10/29/24 at 10:04 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) stated the reports would be reviewed and adjustments made as needed. Staff 1 stated she would collect in the morning for the previous day and would try to complete before the morning meetings.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$182,193 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $100,580 — penalty dated 2026-03-13
- $81,613 — penalty dated 2024-01-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VOLARE HEALTH — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC 12 OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2023 |
| KNOX HEALTHCARE PAC 12 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2023 |
| PAC 12 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2023 |
| PAC 12 PINNACLE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2023 |
| HAGLER, ALEXANDER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2023 |
| KNOX, DONALD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2023 |
| GILBERT CREEK PROPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| SMITH, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2023 |
| VOLARE HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| HART, KEVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/22/2025 |
| KAHN, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2023 |
| SCHWARTZ, ELIEZER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| HAGAR, CHAIM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385148. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.