No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Umpqua Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

525 W. Umpqua Street, Roseburg, OR 97471 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (541) 464-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (541) 464-7100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$8,824 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,824 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1813 W Harvard Ave · (541) 464-6464 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1175 W Harvard Ave · (541) 672-1961 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
930 W Harvard Ave · (541) 672-8440 · Call to confirm hours
Park
800 NW Highland St · (541) 492-6730 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.5%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened41.6%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.4%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.3%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.2%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.2%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.4%16.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.661.481.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.172.351.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 224 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.4%CMS range 63.1–73.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.5–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.5–9.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
42.7%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.31 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotic records were maintained accurately, and an account of all controlled substances were kept for 4 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion. Findings include:On 8/20/25 at 2:00 PM, the narcotic logbook for the Skilled Hall medication cart showed 114 instances out of 300 opportunities in which facility staff did not sign to verify the narcotic count.On 8/20/25 at 2:04 PM, the narcotic logbook number 13 for the 200/300 hall medication cart showed 126 instances out of 300 opportunities in which facility staff did not sign to verify the narcotic count.On 8/20/25 at 2:06 PM, the narcotic logbook number 15 for the 200/300 hall medication cart showed 129 instances out of 300 opportunities in which facility staff did not sign to verify the narcotic count.On 8/20/25 at 2:10 PM, the narcotic logbook number 20 for the 100/300 hall medication cart showed 92 instances out of 300 opportunities in which facility staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications and provide rationale for PRN psychoactive medication beyond 14 days for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#75) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 75 readmitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including depression and dialysis dependence.A 6/5/25 physician order indicated trazodone in the evening for sleep as needed (PRN). No end date was indicated on the order.Review of Resident 75's MARs from 6/2025 through 8/2023 indicated trazodone was administered the following times:- 6/2025: 19 times of out 26 days.- 7/2025: 22 times out of 31 days.- 8/2025: 12 times out of 18 days.A 7/25/25 Pharmacy review indicated the PRN trazodone was requested 19 times in the past 30 days. The pharmacy review indicated the PRN medication was past the 14-day requirement and recommended to discontinue the medication or to provide a clinical rationale and duration for the medication. The pharmacy review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (# 17) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for increased falls. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses of dementia and a history of falls.A Care assessment dated [DATE] noted increased fall risk due to personal history of falls, wandering behavior, poor memory, frequent self-transfers, and dementia. Staff were directed to anticipate her/his needs and perform frequent safety checks.A Nursing Facility Incident Form dated 7/30/25 indicated resident 17 had an unwitnessed fall during an attempt to reach the bathroom in her/his room.On 8/15/25 Resident 17 tested positive for Covid-19 and had been placed on droplet (tiny liquid particles) isolation. Staff were to keep the bedroom door closed at all times.Random observation from 8/11/25 through 8/15/25 on day and evening shifts revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide therapy services for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#78) reviewed for rehabilitation. This placed residents at risk for functional decline and immobility. Findings include:Resident 78 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including stroke with weakness to the non-dominant side. A 7/10/25 Provider Encounter Note revealed an order for physical therapy evaluation due to reduced mobility. On 8/19/25 at 10:03 AM Resident 78 stated she/he wanted physical therapy in order to walk again and felt frustrated because she/he was promised PT and never received it. On 8/20/2025 at 9:56 AM Staff 13 (LPN) stated when he reviewed the provider notes after a physician visit, he checked for any new orders and input them into the system. Staff 13 stated if there was any therapy order he would print out the order for therapy services. Staff 13 stated he was unaware Resident 78 had PT orders. On 8/21/2025 at 11:44 AM Staff 5 (LPN-Resident Care Manager) stated she was not unaware Resident 78 had PT orders from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow proper infection control precautions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and risk of infection. Findings include:According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (2009) III. B.2: -Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. Resident 60 admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including a urinary tract infection.On 8/20/25 at 12:38 PM Resident 60's catheter bag and tubing were observed lying on the floor.On 08/20/2025 1:00 PM Staff 18 (CNA) stated the resident's catheter bag was placed on the floor with a towel underneath due to the resident's bed being in the lowest position.On 8/20/25 at 1:08 PM Staff 4 (LPN Resident Care Manager) entered Resident 60's room and confirmed the catheter bag and tubing were placed on the floor with a towel underneath and stated it was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure air conditioning units were free from leaks and bathroom doors were operational in resident rooms for 2 of 5 facility hallways reviewed for physical environment. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe, lack of privacy and unsanitary environment that was not homelike. Findings include: 1. On 8/18/25 at 12:07 PM room [ROOM NUMBER]'s air conditioning was observed dripping water along the entire bottom panel onto the bedside table and down the wall causing the wall panel to [NAME]. On 8/19/2025 at 3:04 PM Staff 21 (CNA) stated the air conditioning unit had been leaking for the entire summer and the maintenance department was in the room to look at the unit several times, but the problem was ongoing. On 8/19/25 at 3:13 PM Staff 22 (CNA) stated she noticed the air conditioning leaking about six weeks ago and notified the nurse and maintenance staff of the concern.On 8/20/25 at 11:20 AM Staff 23 (Maintenance Assistant) acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 7 sampled resident (#77) and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 77 admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of stroke. A 6/21/23 MDS indicated Resident 77 was moderately impaired in cognition and required extensive two-person assist with toilet use. Resident 77 was at risk for increased incontinence which could lead to skin rashes, infections, altered skin integrity, falls and isolation. An 8/7/23 care plan revealed Resident 77 had incontinence and decreased awareness of the need to eliminate. Interventions included a bladder retraining program. Resident 77 required assistance with ADLs with interventions including provide reminders and cueing as needed, and assistance of staff for toilet use and incontinence care. The plan also indicated to ensure Resident 77's call light was in reach while she/he was in the bathroom. A review of Council Minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 5 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of staff records conducted on 5/14/24 revealed the following: - Staff 24 was hired on 3/9/22, performance evaluation not found. - Staff 25 was hired on 1/2/18, performance evaluation not found. - Staff 26 was hired on 1/25/17, performance evaluation not found. - Staff 27 was hired on 3/23/18, performance evaluation not found. - Staff 28 was hired on 5/13/20, performance evaluation not found. On 5/14/24 at 3:49 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the performance evaluations were not completed annually for Staff 24 (CNA), Staff 25 (CNA), Staff 26 (CNA), Staff 27 (CNA) and Staff 28 (CNA).

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: A review of the DCSDR (Direct Care Staff Daily Reports) from 6/15/23 through 7/15/23, 9/1/23 through 9/15/23 and 11/1/23 through 11/15/23 revealed the following: -6/15/23 no staff hours listed on day shift. -6/16/23 no staff hours on day shift. -6/20/23 no staff hours for CNAs on evening shift. -6/21/23 no staff hours for CNAs on evening shift. -7/14/23 no staff hours for CNAs on evening shift. -9/8/23 no staff hours for CNAs on day shift. -11/3/23 no staff hours for CNAs on evening shift and no census on night shift. -11/15/23 no staff hours for CNAs on evening shift. On 5/13/24 at 11:36 AM the DCSDR was observed with no day shift resident census posted. At 3:53 PM the DCSDR was observed posted and not updated to include the evening shift information. On 5/15/24 at 4:11 PM the DCSDR was observed posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined to facility failed to consistently monitor residents for adverse side effects to anticoagulant medication for 3 of 5 (#s 18, 32 and 52) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects to medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart beat). A review of Resident 18's orders revealed a 1/29/24 order for Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication that thins the blood). A 5/16/24 review of Resident 18's 4/2024 MARs revealed an order to monitor twice a day for adverse side effects to the anticoagulant medication and revealed the task was signed as completed 11 out of 60 times. A 5/16/24 review of Resident 18's 5/1/24 through 5/15/24 MARs revealed an order to monitor twice a day for adverse side effects to the anticoagulant medication and revealed the task was signed as completed one out of 30 times. On 5/16/24 at 4:15 PM Staff 10 (LPN Unit Manager) stated adverse side effects to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to consistently and thoroughly monitor residents on psychotropic medications for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 4, 18, 52 and 77) reviewed for psychotropic medications and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including depression and psychosis (mental disruptions of reality). A 1/10/24 physician order indicated to administer quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) to Resident 4 twice daily due to psychotic disturbances. A 1/11/24 physician order indicated to administer Zoloft (antidepressant medication) to Resident 4 daily due to major depression. The 3/2024 through 5/14/24 nursing Monitors for Resident 4 indicated to monitor for behaviors and side effects of medication which included: excessive sleepiness, verbal expression of sadness, distressing hallucinations (a false perception of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions: implementation of personal protective equipment [gown, gloves, masks and/or goggles] when a resident has an indwelling medical device or wound) timely for 4 of 9 sampled residents (#s 6, 9, 32, and 127) reviewed for infection control and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility 4/11/24 with a diagnosis of wound infection. Resident 6's Care Plan revealed she/he was not started on EBP for her/his chronic wound infection until 5/2/24. On 5/14/24 at 1:52 PM Staff 3 (IP) stated all new residents, prior to admission, were reviewed for the need for EBP. Staff 3 acknowledged EBP were to be implemented in nursing homes, effective 4/1/24, but the facility did not educate and implement the process until the end of 4/2024. Staff 3 acknowledged Resident 6 was not placed on EBP until 5/2/24. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 1, 32, and 77) reviewed for infection control, UTIs and change of condition. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including bladder cancer. A review of Resident 1's medical record revealed 4/19/24 orders to start Augmentin (an antibiotic) for 21 days. A review of Resident 1's labs revealed an 4/22/24 urine analysis (UA) with culture and sensitivity which grew pseudomonas aerugimosa (a type of bacteria), which was not sensitive to Augmentin. On 5/15/24 at 11:19 AM Staff 3 (Infection Preventionist) stated Resident 1's 4/22/24 UA was sent to the urologist. Staff 3 was unable to produce documentation of the urologist's review of the UA. A 5/15/24 review of Resident 1's medical record revealed no evidence for an antibiotic time-out. On 5/15/24 at 3:16 PM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 30 (Regional Director of Clinical) acknowledged an antibiotic time-out was not completed and pseudomonas aerugimosa was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide medication-related risk and benefits information to residents or resident representatives prior to administration for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 77 and 52) reviewed for medications. This placed residents and resident representatives at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: 1. Resident 77 admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of stroke. A 6/18/23 physician order instructed staff to administer one tablet of Ativan (to treat anxiety) by mouth every eight hours PRN for anxiety and two tablets by mouth every eight hours PRN for anxiety. A 6/21/23 nurse practitioner order instructed staff to administer Escitalopram Oxalate (to treat depression and anxiety) one time a day for depression. A 6/23/23 nurse practitioner order instructed staff to administer buspirone (to treat anxiety) two times a day for anxiety. A 6/30/23 signed nurse practitioner order instructed staff to administer Seroquel (an antipsychotic to treat certain mental and mood disorders such as schizophrenia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0560 — isolated
    Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to honor a resident's right to refuse a transfer to another room for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for positioning. This placed residents at risk for lack of honored choices. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including depression and seizures. An 4/3/24 Written Notice of Room Change indicated Resident 25 was asked to move to a semi-private room from a private room on 4/17/24 and Resident 25 refused to sign the room change notification. An 4/3/24 facility Daily Census indicated multiple vacant resident rooms were available on this date. An 4/25/24 Profile for Resident 25 indicated she/he was moved to a different room. On 5/13/24 at 3:53 PM Resident 25 stated she/he refused to sign the 4/3/24 Written Notice of Room Change because she/he had the right to remain in her/his room and did not want to move. On 5/14/24 at 3:33 PM Staff 5 (Social Services) acknowledged the 4/3/24 notification was given to Resident 25 because the facility was choosing to repurpose the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for 1 of 3 (#378) sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. This placed residents at risk for lack of appeal information. Findings include: Resident 378 admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 12/1/23 with diagnoses including cellulitis (an infection of the skin) of the right lower limb. A 1/12/2024 Social Services Note revealed Resident 378 had home health set up upon discharge from the facility, a ramp in place at home and Resident 378 was ready to discharge home once her/his IV antibiotics were completed. A 1/17/24 Progress Note revealed Resident 378's IV antibiotics were completed. Resident 378 discharged from the facility on 1/19/24. A 5/14/24 medical record review revealed no evidence the facility issued a NOMNC for Resident 378. On 5/14/24 at 1:24 PM Staff 35 (Social Service Director) confirmed Resident 378 discharged on 1/19/24 once her/his goals were met. Staff 35 stated Resident 378 was not issued a NOMNC prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to resolve a resident's report of missing clothing for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for missing items. Findings include: Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including a surgical infection. An 4/17/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 6 was cognitively intact. On 5/13/24 at 1:12 PM Resident 6 stated over one week prior she reported to the laundry staff her/his black jacket and a shrinker sock (special sock to wear over an amputation prior to placing a prosthetic) was missing. On 5/14/24 at 1:04 PM Staff 6 (Laundry) stated if a resident reported a missing item staff immediately looked for the item. If the item was not found, staff wrote the resident's name and missing item on a chalk board and also on a piece of paper to alert staff to look for the item. With Staff 6 the chalk board was observed to not have Resident 6's name or missing items listed. Staff 6 stated she did not see Resident 6's name on any paper to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and misappropriation to the state agency or local law enforcement for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 1 and 47) reviewed for abuse and medications. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including quadriplegia. A review of a 2/22/24 grievance revealed Resident 1 had $160 go missing on 2/15/24, and the facility replaced the money on 3/21/24. A review of an 4/22/24 MDS revealed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. On 5/16/24 at 10:48 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she did not think the money was missing to begin with. Staff 1 acknowledged the allegation of missing money was not reported to the state agency or to local law enforcement, and stated if there was a trend of missing money in the facility, it would have been reported. 2. Resident 47 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including stroke and severe cognitive impairment. Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete thorough investigations for allegations of abuse for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 1 and 47) reviewed for abuse and medications. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including quadriplegia. A review of a 2/22/24 grievance revealed Resident 1 had $160 go missing on 2/15/24, the facility replaced the money on 3/21/24. A review of an 4/22/24 MDS indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. On 5/16/24 at 10:48 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she did not think the money was missing to begin with, and acknowledged the allegation of missing money was not investigated. 2. Resident 47 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including a stroke and cognitive impairment. Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a stroke. A progress note dated 5/4/24 at 10:30 PM documented Resident 52 was sitting in her/his wheelchair on the 100 hall near the nursing station. Resident 47 was mobilizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#77) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet medications needs. Findings include: Resident 77 admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of stroke. A 12/7/23 Discharge Orders and Instructions (discharge packet) revealed instructions for Resident 77 to continue medication on the Discharge Medication List and the medications were sent to pharmacy of choice. The signed Orders and Summary report included the following: Amlodipine (to treat high blood pressure), Atorvastatin (to treat high bad cholesterol), Baclofen (to treat muscle spasms), buspirone (to treat anxiety), clopidogrel (used to prevent heart attacks and strokes), Diclofenac (to treat mild to moderate pain and swelling), Docusate (to treat constipation), Escitalopram (to treat depression), Ibuprofen (to treat mild to moderate pain), Insulin (to treat diabetes), Levoxyl (to treat an underactive thyroid), Lisinopril (to treat high blood pressure), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided an activity program for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#63) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident 63 admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. A 1/8/24 My Ways activity assessment revealed Resident 63 reported she he did not like group activities and did not want to be invited to church groups, really enjoyed short 1:1 visits, and appreciated the library cart when brought to her/him. A 1/31/24 Significant Change MDS revealed Resident 63 had memory issues. Activities Resident 63 identified as somewhat important included magazines, music, pets and being with groups of people. It was assessed Resident 63 thought it was very important to do her/his favorite activities. Resident 63's Care Plan revised on 2/8/24 revealed staff were to encourage ongoing family involvement, 1:1 bedside visits, reading, family visits, and rest. An 4/30/24 Nursing Note revealed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond to changes in condition in a timely manner and failed to follow physician orders for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 32, 52 and 77) reviewed for change of condition, pain, and medications. This placed residents at risk for delay of treatment. Findings include: 1. Resident 77 admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of stroke. A 6/17/23 admission readmission Evaluation indicated Resident 77 was alert with orientation of person, place, and situation with appropriate verbal skills with slow speech. Resident 77 was continent of bladder and had moderate complaints of pain. A 6/18/23 Administration Note revealed the following: -6:44 AM Resident 77 was agitated and yelling and screaming out that she/he was in pain and was going to die. Resident 77 stated she/he was getting worse and not better. Resident 77 only had Tylenol (to treat mild to moderate pain) available. -7:34 AM indicated Resident 77 was still agitated and yelling about random things and less about pain. -9:16 AM the on-call provider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#77) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of nail care, pain, and increased infections. Findings include: Resident 77 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis of diabetes. A 6/30/23 care plan indicated Resident 77 had diabetes. Interventions included to refer to a podiatrist or foot care nurse, to monitor and document foot care needs and to cut long nails. No documentation was found in clinical record Resident 77 was referred to a podiatrist or foot care nurse. From 6/18/23 through 11/5/23 no documentation was found in clinical record Resident 77 received nail care to her/his feet. On 11/6/23 a Nursing Note indicated Resident 77 was provided nail care. From 11/7/23 through 12/11/23 no documentation was found in clinical record Resident 77 received nail care to her/his feet. A public complaint was received on 2/1/24 which indicated while Resident 77 was residing at the facility between 6/2023 and 12/2023 she/he did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from smoking hazards for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#57) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for a hazardous environment. Findings include: Resident 57 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and chronic pain. A 3/2023 revised Physical Environment Facility with Independent and Supervised Smokers policy indicated residents deemed as independent smokers were to store smoking materials in an individual storage box located outside the resident's room. A 2/7/24 Nursing Smoking Screen indicated Resident 57 was safely able to smoke or vape (inhaled nicotine mist created by an electronic device) independently and had a history of hiding her/his smoking materials from staff. A 2/7/24 revised care plan indicated to notify the charge nurse if Resident 57 violated the facility smoking policy which included the storage of her/his smoking materials in her/his room. A 5/15/24 Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was evaluated timely after weight loss for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#127) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for continued weight loss. Findings include: Resident 127 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with a diagnosis of a surgical infection. A 5/2/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 127 was obese, but weight loss was not a goal at that time due to calories required to heal from a surgical infection. Staff were to weigh the resident weekly and then monthly. Resident 127's 4/2024 and 5/2024 weight record revealed on 4/26/24, the resident weighed 232 lbs, on 4/29/24 239 pounds, and on 5/7/24 was 217 pounds. From 4/29/24 to 5/7/24 Resident 127 had a 9.21% weight loss. Resident 127's clinical record did not contain an assessment, re-weigh, or rationale for the 9.21% weight loss. On 5/15/24 at 11:03 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated if a resident had a significant weight change, staff were to re-weigh the resident to ensure the recorded weight was accurate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain management for 3 of 10 sampled residents (#s 32, 61, and 77) reviewed for pain management, change of condition and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of pain control. Findings include: 1. Resident 32 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including surgical aftercare and disc degeneration in the lumbar region (age-related deterioration of the discs in the lower back). An 4/6/24 care plan revealed Resident 32 had pain, with interventions including evaluation of the effectiveness of the resident's pain management every shift, monitor and document the resident's pain characteristics; the quality, severity, anatomical location, onset, duration, aggravating factors, and relieving factors. An 4/11/24 MDS indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact and had frequent pain presence which affected her/his sleep occasionally and affected therapy and day to day activities frequently. Resident 32 was at risk for uncontrolled pain, social isolation, and decline. An 4/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to consistently monitor a dialysis access site for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications. Resident 26 admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including stroke and end stage renal disease. An order dated 3/12/24 instructed staff to monitor the resident's dialysis access site for bruit (whooshing) and thrill (vibration) twice a day. A review of the clinical record revealed the site was monitored for bruit and thrill 11 of 39 opportunities in 3/2024, 14 of 60 opportunities in 4/2024, and one time in 32 opportunities in 5/2024. On 5/17/24 at 9:59 AM Staff 14 (LPN Unit Manager) was asked about dialysis monitoring. Staff 14 stated staff were expected to check the site for any bleeding, check bruit and thrill and to ensure there was a dressing in place. Staff 14 was asked about the lack of site monitoring. No additional information was provided.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pneumonia vaccines were offered for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 42 and 67). This placed residents at risk for respiratory illness. Findings include: A 2/9/23 CDC shared Clinical Decision-Making tool revealed: If a resident over 65 completed the pneumonia vaccine series with PCV 13 AND PPSV23, PCV20 was not routinely recommended. Factors including residing in a nursing home or residents who had more than one chronic medical condition including heart and lung disease, diabetes and a weakened immune system should be evaluated for PCV 20 appropriateness. 1. Resident 42 admitted to the facility in 2021 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Immunization records revealed Resident 42 received two pneumonia vaccines. Resident 42 was eligible for but not assessed by the resident's physician for an additional vaccine. On 5/14/24 at 2:09 PM Staff 3 (IP) acknowledged Resident 42's pneumonia vaccines were complete but an additional vaccine could be administered after clinical evaluation. A request was made to Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide abuse training for 3 of 5 (#'s 26, 27, and 28) staff reviewed for abuse training. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: A review of the facility's in-service records identified the following issues: -Staff 26 (CNA) had no documentation of completing the annual abuse training. -Staff 27 (CNA) had no documentation of completing the annual abuse training. -Staff 28 (CNA) had no documentation of completing the annual abuse training. On 5/16/24 at 2:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the above staff did not complete their annual abuse training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was served at the proper temperature to prevent avoidable burns for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for food temperature. This placed residents at risk for oral burns. Findings include: Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including stroke and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). The 1/9/24 BIMS assessment score was 4 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The 1/1/24 Facility Investigation revealed Resident 4 sustained an injury which had discoloration, edema and blistering to the inner bottom lip of the mouth which measured 2 cm x 0.6 cm. The investigation revealed on 12/31/23 around 5:00 PM Staff 4 (CNA) obtained Resident 4's food tray directly from the kitchen tray line and brought it to the resident. Resident 4 grimaced and made a loud noise with the first bite of food. Staff 4 stated the food burned Resident 4 and proceeded to place a spoonful of the pureed food onto her own arm and determined the food felt too hot. At the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the time between the start of the evening meal and the start of the breakfast meal did not exceed 14 hours without providing a substantial evening snack and snacks were suitable and available at non-traditional times for 1 of 1 facility, 1 of 3 facility snack refrigerators and 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 29 and 35) reviewed for food and dining. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and hunger. Findings include: 1. A review of the meal service times revealed dinner started at 4:30 PM and breakfast started at 7:30 AM, a span of 15 hours. On 2/7/23 at 9:28 AM the snack refrigerator was observed to contain three half sandwiches, two thickened cranberry juice cocktails and two milk substitutes. On 2/7/23 at 2:31 PM Staff 33 (CNA) stated the kitchen was supposed to stock the refrigerator at 1:00 PM. At times the items were not ready and the CNAs were asked to stock. Staff 33 added they were given puddings, cottage cheese and applesauce. There were no sugar free items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure standard food safety practices were followed for 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 2 unit refrigerators. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. 1. On 2/6/23 the documented dinner time for residents began at 4:30 PM. On 2/6/23 at 3:05 PM the kitchen steam table was observed with cooked food on the steam table line including: whole black beans and a container of pureed green food. Three additional unidentified food containers sat in the steam table covered with foil. On 2/6/23 at 4:08 PM Staff 38 (Dietary Aide) stated he was the designated cook for dinner and started to prepare the puree foods around 12:30 PM and placed them on the steam table beginning at 1:00 PM. Staff 38 stated he understood food was not to be on the steam table line earlier than two hours prior to the meal service. On 2/8/23 at 11:20 AM Staff 29 (RD) stated foods should not be on the steam table line earlier than 30 minutes prior to meal service. 2. On 2/7/23 at 9:28 AM the ICF (Intermediate Care Facility)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike dining experience for 2 of 2 dining rooms reviewed for dining. This place residents at risk for a lack of homelike dining. Findings include: On 2/7/23 at 8:06 AM 19 residents were observed in the dining room for breakfast. The tables lacked table clothes, centerpieces or condiments. Trays were served to various residents at four different tables. The plates remained on the trays and plate covers were left on the tables next to the residents. Two female residents were served at their table while the remaining two residents sat approximately 10 minutes while waiting for their meals to be served. On 2/7/23 at 8:26 AM another table was observed with three student nurses standing while assisting residents with their meals. A facility CNA was seated at the same table assisting another resident. On 2/7/23 at 2:50 PM Staff 33 (CNA) stated staff were supposed to serve the entire table at the same time but the carts were disorganized and staff were told not to leave trays sitting too long. Staff 33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 5 of 10 sampled residents (#s 4, 35, 42, 65 and 81) reviewed for weight loss, pain management and positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including hip fracture and difficulty swallowing. The medical record documented a weight loss of 16 percent from 8/26/22 to 2/5/23 indicating severe weight loss. A review of Resident 42's nutrition care plan revealed a problem related to high body mass index (signifying overweight status), therapeutic diet, hip fracture, arthritis, low sodium levels and gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). The care plan goal was for no significant weight loss and interventions included to provide diet as ordered and refer to the RD PRN. On 2/7/23 at 10:10 AM Resident 42 stated prior to admission she/he was not on a special diet but there were things she/he could not eat. Resident 42 indicated some foods caused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow proper infection control techniques during wound care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#61) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: Resident 61 was admitted to the facility in 12/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and Stage 4 pressure ulcer (wound reaching muscle, ligaments, or bones). On 2/8/23 at 2:57 PM Staff 13 (Unit Manager) was observed to perform a dressing change on Resident 61. Staff 13 removed the dirty dressing from the wound and then proceeded to clean the wound with dirty gloves. Staff 13 donned clean gloves and used a sterile Q-tip to place calcium alginate (natural fiber dressing to promote wound healing) inside the wound, cleaned around the wound and retrieved and opened a package of clean bandages without changing her gloves. Staff 13 acknowledged she did not change her gloves after she removed the soiled dressing and should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity and respect. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with a diagnoses including quadriplegia, traumatic brain injury, speech and language deficits. A 7/10/22 Dehydration and Fluid Maintenance CAA revealed Resident 2 was at risk for dehydration and was a one to one feeder. A 7/20/22 comprehensive care plan indicated Resident 2 had a potential fluid deficit and was a one-to-one person feeder. On 2/7/23 at 8:28 AM three nursing students were observed assisting three different residents to eat. Staff 16 (Nursing student) was standing over Resident 2 as she assisted her/him to eat. On 2/8/23 at 12:13 PM Staff 11 (CNA) stated residents who required assistance with eating or drinking were called assisted feeders. On 2/9/23 at 8:33 AM Staff 10 (CNA) stated they separated the residents in the dining room to feed the feeders. On 2/9/23 at 10:12 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess residents for safe self-administration of medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration. Findings include: Resident 53 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including end stage kidney disease. An 10/25/22 Physician order revealed orders for sevelamer carbonate oral tablet (a medication to decrease phosphate levels in patients with kidney disease). A 11/23/22 Annual MDS revealed Resident 53 had a BIMS of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 2/6/23 at 11:39 AM Resident 53 was observed in bed asleep and there was a white pill in a medication cup on her/his overbed table. On 2/6/23 at 11:45 AM Staff 3 (LPN) and Staff 31 (LPN Unit Manager) confirmed the medication was sevelamer carbonate and stated Resident 53 was alert and oriented and cleared to self-administer medication. On 2/6/23 at 11:47 AM Resident 53 stated the nurses gave her/him sevelamer carbonate upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to keep call lights within reach of 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 28 and 68) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for not being able to call for assistance. Findings include: 1. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility in 6/2022 with diagnoses including fractured leg. The 6/14/22 care plan indicated staff were to ensure Resident 68's call light was within reach. On 2/6/23 at 12:07 PM Resident 68 sat in her/his room on the side of her/his bed. Resident 68's call light was wrapped around the wheel of the bed not in reach of the resident. Resident 68 reached for her/his call light for assistance to the restroom. The resident bent down, tried to grab the call light, and fell back on the bed due to being dizzy. On 2/6/23 at 12:10 PM Staff 41 (CNA) viewed Resident 68's call light underneath her/his bed and stated Resident 68's call light should be within reach of the resident. On 2/8/23 at 11:59 AM Staff 13 (Unit Manager) stated she expected Resident 68 to have her/his call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#31) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including heart failure and history of mini strokes. A 1/16/23 signed physician order instructed staff to administer Xarelto (prevents blood clots) every evening for blood clot prevention. A 1/2023 MAR instructed staff to administer Xarelto by mouth for blood clot prevention. From 1/22/23 through 1/31/23 Resident 31 refused the medication. A 2/2023 MAR instructed staff to administer Xarelto by mouth for blood clot prevention. From 2/1/23 through 2/8/23 Resident 31 refused the medication. No documentation was found in the clinical record the physician was notified of Resident 31's refusals of taking Xarelto. On 2/9/23 at 10:19 AM Staff 13 (Unit Manager) stated the physician was notified on 2/9/23 about Resident 31's refusal of taking Xarelto. Staff 13 stated she expected staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and follow the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 61 and 65) reviewed for ROM and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 61 was admitted to the facility in 12/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and altered mental status. A physician order dated 12/5/22 indicated, staff were to cleanse the residents hands with soap and water, dry thoroughly, place palm grip in hands and remove at HS. The revised care plan dated 12/6/22 indicated Resident 61 was to wear palm protectors in the morning and to be removed at night to bilateral hands to prevent skin breakdown related to hand contractures. Random observations from 2/7/23 through 2/9/23 during day and evening shifts revealed Resident 61's hands were in a fist, her/his nails dug into her/his palms and the resident was not wearing her/his palm protectors. On 2/8/23 at 2:57 PM Staff 44 (CNA) verified Resident 61 was not wearing her/his palm protectors. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement mobility devices to ensure residents maintained ROM for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#41) reviewed for range of motion. This placed residents at risk for a decline in their range of motion and functional abilities. Findings include: Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including a stroke. A review of the facility's 6/2018 Restorative Nursing Program policy revealed the following: - The facility provides services, care and equipment to assure that a resident maintains and/or improves his/her level of range of motion and mobility unless a reduction is clinically unavoidable. - Residents will be routinely assess for the need of a formalized Restorative Nursing program. - Restorative Nursing programs will be developed and/or formalized by a supervising nurse, contain measurable objective (s) and be included in the resident's care plan. - Restorative Nursing will be re-evaluated periodically by a licensed nurse and updated as necessary. A 12/3/22 Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess smoking and ensure residents' environment was free of smoking hazards for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#12, 43 and 53) reviewed for smoking. This placed residents at risk for smoking hazards. Findings include: A review of the 5/2018 Facility's Independent and Supervised Smokers policy revealed the following: - Smoking would occur in designated areas only. - Residents who wished to smoke would be assessed for smoking safety by nursing. - Residents deemed safe to be independent in smoking would have their personal smoking paraphernalia locked in a secure area, not in the resident's room. - Residents who are independent smokers would obtain their smoking paraphernalia staff upon request and residents would return items for storage after smoking. 1. Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including dementia and nicotine addiction. A review of Resident 12's progress notes revealed the following: - On 9/21/22 Resident 12 was observed smoking in a non-designated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide palatable meals for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings include: Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes. A review of the 1/4/23 Interdisciplinary Team Care Plan Conference/Welcome meeting evaluation revealed Resident 29 stated the soups were too soupy. Staff 27 (Dietary Manager) was listed as an attendee. On 2/6/23 at 1:15 PM Resident 29 stated the chicken noodle soup tasted like, warm water with guts in it. Resident 29 stated she/he notified the dietary manager but nothing was done about it. On 2/8/23 at 12:52 PM the chicken noodle soup was sampled. The soup was warm but the broth tasted like water. On 2/10/23 at 1:00 PM Staff 27 confirmed she was notified during the week of 1/30/23 the chicken noodle soup tasted watered-down and acknowledged she did not inform the cook until after the meal was sampled on 2/8/23.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to address and honor food preferences for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 12 and 34) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for lack of honored preferences and meal satisfaction. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 4/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes and dementia. The 12/24/22 care plan indicated Resident 12 was independent for meals and food preferences were to be honored. A 2/1/23 IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Care Plan Conference/Welcome Meeting Form indicated Resident 12 complained her/his meat at meals was tough. On 2/6/23 Resident 12 stated she/he complained to the dietary department the meat at meals was tough but there was no follow up on her/his concern because meat at meals continued to be tough. Resident 12 also stated she/he often did not receive the food she/he ordered. On 2/8/23 at 12:57 PM Staff 37 (CNA) stated Resident 12's tray lacked a food item. Resident 12's meal tray was observed and compared to her/his meal ticket which revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,824 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-05-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VOLARE HEALTH — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 51.8+2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PAC 12 OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 01/01/2023
KNOX HEALTHCARE PAC 12 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
PAC 12 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
PAC 12 PINNACLE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
HAGLER, ALEXANDERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
KNOX, DONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
SPARKS, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
VOLARE HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023
SCHWARTZ, ELIEZERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 12%Other / private 32%

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$555per resident / day
operating cost
$16,862per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$585per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385143. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next