Newport Meadows Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 132.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-11-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication error for one of three residents, resulting in Resident R1 needing emergency medical treatment (Resident R1). This situation was identified as past non compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Administering Medications revealed number nine indicating the following: The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: a. checking identification band; b. checking photograph attached to medical record; and c. if necessary, verifying resident identification with other facility personnel. Further review of the facility policy revealed number ten which indicated: The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and procedure and clinical record and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to safely reheat a beverage for one of 32 residents reviewed causing actual harm to Resident 32 who developed a 2nd degree burn. Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Microwave Use, undated, revealed staff should remove beverage from microwave, uncover, stir and insert thermometer probe into center of beverage item ensuring contact with beverage only. Check digital display for a maximum temperature of <165. Let sit for three minutes before serving. Review of Resident 32's Progress Notes revealed a nursing entry dated July 10, 2024 at 8:16 a.m. indicating While administering medication [resident] states that [resident] burned [himself/herself] while drinking [his/her] coffee. [Resident] states, I asked him to heat up my coffee and I spilled it on myself. [Resident] reports [he/she] burned both [his/her] butt cheeks. Further review of Resident 32's progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, medical records, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain medication administration records that were complete and accurate for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:Review of Resident 1's latest annual MDS (Minimum Data Set - a comprehensive evaluation of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) dated December 12, 2025 revealed that Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: bladder cancer, diabetes mellitus, depression, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, insomnia due to mental disorder, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, chronic pain syndrome, and lumbago with sciatica, unspecified side. Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status - a standardized tool to evaluate a resident's cognitive status) was a 15 (indicating the resident is cognitively intact).Review of facility policy titled Administering Pain Medications,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility's policy, observation, clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Urinary Continence and Incontinence - Assessment and Management , dated 2001, revealed that the staff and management will appropriately screen for, and manage, individuals with urinary incontinence. The staff will provide appropriate services and treatment to help residents restore or improve bladder function and prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible.A review of Resident 1's Quarterly MDS Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated August 12, 2025, revealed resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and was dependent with toileting.An observation conducted on October 30, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., in the presence of unlicensed Employee E3 revealed resident laying in bed wearing a blue gown, with disheveled hair.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based upon review of facility policy and procedure and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage and labeling of medications in three of four medication carts observed (Chestnut Medication Cart 2, Evergreen Medication Cart, and Birch Medication Cart 1).Findings include:Review of facility policy and procedure titled Medication Labeling and Storage revealed multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial.Review of manufacturer information for Dorzolamide Eye drops (medication used for glaucoma treatment) revealed Dorzolamide eye drops should be discarded 28 days after opening.Review of manufacturer information for Latanoprost Eye drops (medication used for glaucoma treatment) revealed Latanoprost eye drops should be discarded six weeks after opening.Observation of the Chestnut Medication Cart 2 on September 9, 2025, at 11:15 a.m. revealed one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based upon interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate notification was provided to a resident prior to a room change for one of twenty-five residents reviewed (Resident 16).Findings include:Review of Resident 16's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including major depressive disorder (major loss of interest in pleasurable activities, characterized by changes in sleep patterns, appetite and/or daily routine), diabetes mellitus (failure of the body to produce insulin to enable sugar to pass through the bloodstream to cells for nourishment), and bladder cancer.Review of Resident 16's progress notes revealed that Resident 16 was sent to the hospital on August 11, 2025, related to abdominal pain.Further review of Resident 16's progress notes dated August 14, 2025, revealed resident arrived from hospital via stretcher with 2 attendants and taken to room [ROOM NUMBER] for admission, upon seeing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that privacy curtains were clean on one of five units (Dogwood unit).Findings include: The facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment by not ensuring privacy curtains were clean when visibly soiled.Observations made on September 7, 2025, at 12:15 p.m., of 12 rooms on the Dogwood unit, revealed that nine of the residents' rooms had privacy curtains that were stained with brown and/or red substances, the rooms of Resident 7, Resident 22, Resident 47, Resident 50, Resident 53, Resident 54, Resident 56, Resident 59, Resident 68, Resident 78, Resident 88, Resident 94, Resident 108, Resident 112, Resident 121, and Resident 123.During an interview on September 9, 2025, at approximately 1:30 p.m., when the above was presented the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated she would investigate the matter. During phone interview on September 15, 2025, at 10:20 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated housekeeping usually cleans the privacy curtains upon discharge of a resident or when notified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on facility policy and procedure review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders and appropriately monitor fluid intake for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 3)Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Encourage and Restricting Fluids (2001) states: Licensed staff will document on the eMAR (electronic medication administration record) yes or no if the fluid restriction is accepted or not accepted by the resident.Clinical medical record review for Resident 3 identified an active physician's order, dated March 17, 2025, for a 1500 ml (milliliter) fluid restriction. The order specified the following distribution: 7 a.m.-3 p.m. nursing: 330 ml; 3 p.m.-11 p.m. nursing: 330 ml; 11 p.m.-7 a.m. nursing: 120 ml. Dietary allocations were as follows: breakfast 360 ml, lunch 240 ml, and dinner 120 ml, for a total of 1500 ml within a 24-hour period.Review of the clinical medical record further identified the following diagnoses:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure physician was notified of change in resident's condition/status. Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition/status for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 2021, revealed the facility notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an):a. accident or incident involving the resident;b. discovery of injuries of an unknown source;c. adverse reaction to medication;d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition;e. need to alter the resident's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately monitor and assess residents for side effects of antipsychotic medications for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 2, 84, and 93). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's physician's orders revealed an order dated March 31, 2023, for Abilify (antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg) once daily. Review of Resident 2's clinical record failed to reveal evidence of side effect monitoring for the antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident 84's physician's orders revealed an order dated September 14, 2024, for Abilify 10 mg once daily. Review of Resident 84's clinical record failed to reveal evidence of side effect monitoring for the antipsychotic medication. Interview with licensed nurse Employee E3 on September 25, 2024, at approximately 10:50 a.m. revealed side effect monitoring for residents on antipsychotics should be found on the residents' Medication Administration Record (MAR). Review of Resident 2 and Resident 84's September 2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and procedure and observation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate adherence to Infection Prevention measures in regard to COVID-19 for one of five units observed (1st Floor Chestnut Unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Resident Exposure, Quarantine and Isolation revealed staff will use full PPE (N95 or approved equivalent respirator, gown, gloves and eye protection) before entering the room and to provide care for the resident(s) in isolation; PPE will be discarded prior to exiting the room, or between care of residents residing in same room, with the exception of reusable universal eyewear to be cleaned at least daily and after patient encounter; N95 respirator will be removed and universal source control (i.e. facemask) will be worn upon exit if indicated. Observation of the 1st Floor Chestnut Unit on September 22, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. revealed Licensed Employee E5 standing in the hallway outside a resident room. Licensed Employee E5 was wearing a cover gown,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a plan of care with interventions for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 26 and 93). Findings include: Observation on September 22, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. revealed Resident 26 was receiving oxygen at 2 liters per minute through a nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a person in need of respiratory help). Review of Resident 26's physician's orders included an order for oxygen at 2 Liter/minute via nasal cannula PRN (as needed). Review of the Resident 26's current active care plan failed to reveal a care plan or interventions for oxygen therapy. Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 25, 2024, at 9:50 a.m. confirmed that Resident 26 did not have a care plan for oxygen therapy. Observation of Resident 93 on September 22, 2024, at 10:05 a.m. revealed the resident had a left wrist contracture (permanent tightening of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$42,912 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $13,575 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
• $13,575 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
• $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $7,976 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
• $4,368 — penalty dated 2023-12-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA