Horsham Center For Jewish Life
1425 Horsham Road, North Wales, PA 19454 · For profit - Corporation · 324 certified beds · (215) 371-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $114,699 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-08)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.8% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.5% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.9% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.38 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 669 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 310 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.1%CMS range 54.6–64.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 8.2–11.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.5%CMS range 3.9–7.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 324 beds and averages 306.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies, and interview with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment was free of accident hazards, and failed to ensure hazardous materials were not accessible to one of nine residents (Resident R1). Staff failed to provide supervision for Resident R1 with documented history of suicidal ideation and who voiced suicidal thoughts. This failure resulted in Resident R1 obtaining a disposable razor and cutting her/his wrist. This failure placed Resident R1 at risk for serious injury and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R1. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings Include: Review of facility policy Safety and Supervision of Residents dated August 2024, revealed Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety, supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision was provided to a resident who verbally expressed to nursing staff that she wanted to kill herself, which resulted in an Immediate jeopardy to Resident R1 who ingested acetaminophen, was transferred out to the hospital, had elevated blood levels of acetaminophen, and received treatment for intentional acetaminophen overdose (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the August 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function that can lead to kidney failure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); muscle weakness; anxiety (excessive, persistent and uncontrollable worry and fear about everyday situations) and depression (a mood disorder that cause persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff, and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis treatment receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, including ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before, during, and after dialysis treatments for one of three dialysis resident's reviewed (Resident R104). The facility's failure to properly monitor Resident R104's right arm fistula (used for dialysis access) resulted in actual harm to Resident R104 who required an emergent transfer to the hospital from the dialysis center when the resident's fistula was assessed as swollen, infected with purulent (thick, yellowish substance that occurs with infection) drainage and the development of a non-occlusive right brachial deep vein thrombosis. (Resident R104). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hemodialysis Catheters-Access and Care of revised on, February 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise resident care plans timely for four of thirty-five residents reviewed. (Residents R221, R222, R306, and R312)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team undated states, Policy Statement-The interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Resident care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by 483.21 Review of resident clinical record for Resident R221 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R221 had a care conference held on October 31, 2025. The next care conference was not held until April 7, 2026. The time in between care plans was over five months. Review of resident clinical record for Resident R222 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R222 had a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility did not to prominently display and maintain facility daily staffing hours as required for three days (April 6, April 7, April 8). Findings Include: Observation of the front lobby reception desk revealed a nurse staff posting from Monday March 23, 2025. A tour was taken with the Director of Social Services Employee E22 on April 8, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. revealed the lobby reception desk nurse staff posting was still from Monday March 23, 2025. A tour of the A1 unit revealed nurse staffing posting from April 7, 2026 no PPD or census was listed. A tour of C3 unit revealed nurse staffing posting from April 7, 2026 with no PPD or census. The Director of Nursing confirmed on April 8, 2026 at 11:15 a.m. that the person in charge of posting the nurse staffing was new and was unaware of how to complete the appropriate posting. The previous staff in charge has not been employed for approximately three weeks. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(3)(e)(1) Management
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at the proper temperature for twelve of thirty five residents reviewed (Residents R5, R12, R22, R151, R119, R144, R188, R223, R257, R113, R128 and R322).Findings include: During the initial tour of the facility on April 6, 2026, the following resident interviews were obtained on units C1 and D1: Interview on Unit C1 with Resident R5 at 10:28 a.m. revealed that she does not like the food, particularly during Passover when she cannot eat the matzoh as it exacerbates her irritable bowel syndrome. Interview with the nurse aide, Employee E9, outside Resident R5's room revealed that the kitchen is very strict with Passover meals. Interview on C1 with Resident R188 at 10:35 a.m. revealed that she didn't like the food, thought it could be better, it's not edible, it's tasteless, not warm enough, that it was much better a year or so ago. Interview on Unit C1 with Resident R322 at 10:39 a.m. revealed that the food is really bad, the coffee is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment related to medication refrigerator on unit D3 and ice and water dispenser on unit C1 were in a safe and working condition for use by residents and nursing staff on two of twelve nursing units.Findings include: Interview with Resident R13 on Unit C1 on April 6, 2026, at 11:15 a.m. during the initial tour revealed that he had not had ice in his water for the last few days. Interview with Resident R188 on Unit C1 on April 6, 2026, at 11:19 a.m. during the initial tour revealed that she had not had ice since last Friday, April 3, 2026, and she was upset, I can't drink warm water. Interview with Resident R322 on Unit C1 on April 6, 2026, at 11:28 a.m. during the initial tour revealed that she had not had ice for three days, and why can't they get ice from the kitchen? Observation on Unit C1 on April 6, 2026, at 11:40 a.m. revealed three maintenance workers were wheeling the ice and water dispenser on a cart down the hall saying that they were taking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not maintain a dignified environment for three of thirty-five residents observed (Resident R151, R194, R312) and on three of twelve dining rooms (C1, D1, D2). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Homelike Environment undated states, Policy Statement-Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. 2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: .i. comfortable sound levels . 3. The facility staff and management minimizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a depersonalized, institutional setting. On April 6, 2026 lunch observation was made on second floor A-pod dining room at 12:02 p.m. and the lunch plates were being served on trays to the residents. Staff were seen setting down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the clinical record, facility documentation, observations, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of 35 resident records reviewed (Resident R271).Findings included: Review of Resident R271's Admission's MDS (an assessment of resident's needs) dated January 13, 2026 once admitted to the facility revealed the resident was alert and oriented, and was admitted with one Stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss, slough may be present but did not obscure the depth of tissue loss) and six pressure areas known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar (dead tissue). The MDS indicated that the resident's functional capabilities were fully dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living that included toileting, showering/bathing, dressing, and needed substantial maximal assistants with personal hygiene.Observation and interview with Resident R271 on April 6, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. revealed the resident appeared unkept,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with resident and facility staff, review of hospital documentation resident clinical documentation and facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, to ensure facilities identify and provide needed care and services to maintain appropriate care for one resident's indwelling foley catheter and failed to assess and reassess the foley catheter to determine appropriate indications of use for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R271)Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Urinary Continence and Incontinence -Assessment and Management revised August 2022 states, Physician and staff will provide appropriate services and treatment to help residents restore or improve bladder function Indwelling urinary catheters will be used sparingly, for appropriate indications only.If a resident is admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor resident weights and implement timely interventions for significant weight loss. Resident R81. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention (March 2022) revealed that residents are weighed upon admission and thereafter per physician order, with weights documented in unit records and the medical record. The policy requires monitoring for unintended weight changes, with any change of 5% or more reweighed for confirmation and, if verified, prompt notification of the dietitian. Significant weight loss is defined as 5% in one month (greater than 5% considered severe). The interdisciplinary team is responsible for evaluating causes, including medical conditions and medications, and developing an individualized care plan with goals, interventions, and ongoing monitoring. Interventions are based on resident needs, preferences, and clinical factors, including nutritional status,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper documentation was maintained to support continuity of hospice care for one resident (Resident R81) out of three residents reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hospice Program dated July 2017 revealed that the facility maintains an agreement with a Medicare-certified hospice provider to support end-of-life care for eligible residents. The policy requires clear, timely communication and comprehensive documentation between the facility and hospice services. The facility is responsible for ensuring that hospice-related documentation is obtained, maintained, and accessible, including the hospice plan of care, election forms, physician certifications, medication information, and hospice contact information. The policy further requires that all communications with hospice providers be documented, and that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices related to care and maintenance of oxygen concentrators for three of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R199, R13 and R119). Findings include: Observations during the initial tour on April 6, 2026, at 11:35 a.m. of Resident R199 room on unit C1 revealed that the filter on the oxygen concentrator was dirty having a thick whitish grey build-up on the black filter on the side of the machine. Interview with Resident R199 revealed that she uses the oxygen all the time. Follow-up observation on April 7, 2026, at 10:36 a.m. with Employee E10, LPN, revealed the filter was still dirty. A review of Resident R199's medical records revealed a March 16, 2026, physician's order to clean the oxygen concentrator filter weekly. Observations on April 6, 2026, at 11:42 a.m. of R113 room on unit C1 revealed that the filter on the oxygen concentrator was dirty having a thick whitish grey build-up on the black filter on the side of the machine. Interview with Resident R13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly inform the resident's representative of a significant change in the resident's condition and hospital transfer. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1).Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated February 2024, indicated that the facility is required to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative of any significant change in condition, including transfer to the hospital.Review of the resident's clinical record revealed that Resident R1 legally designated her family member as Power of Attorney, dated August 1, 2023.Review of the medical provider notes for Resident R1 dated January 9, 2025, at 9:31 a.m., documented: Patient seen and examined at request for changing condition. Aide reports noticing large amounts of blood on the floor, wheelchair, and bathroom floor. Upon immediate evaluation, patient resting in bed; gown covered with blood, dried blood on sheets,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility provided documentation, review of policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to report the results of all investigations within five working days to the administrator or his/her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law for two of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1, R9). Review of facility's policy 'Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating,' revised September 2024, indicates that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to facility on July 21, 2025 and discharged on August 8, 2025. R1 had a medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and malignant neoplasm of upper lobe/right bronchus or lung.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that were served at palatable temperatures for one of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident R10) Findings include: Observation on December 22, 2025 at 09:20 a.m. of resident trays transported from kitchen to nursing unit using open carts.Observations during a test tray conducted with the Food Service Director, Employee E7, on December 22, 2025 at 09:35 a.m. revealed eggs registered 116 degree Fahrenheit (F), coffee 123 degree Fahrenheit (F), orange juice 51 degree Fahrenheit (F), chocolate milk 46 degree Fahrenheit (F).Follow-up interview with the Food Service Director, on December 22, 2025 at 9:35 a.m. confirmed that these food items were outside the acceptable temperature range and therefore not palatable.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete and thorough investigation was conducted for bruises of unknown origin for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed (Resident R4).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating with a revision date of September 2024 indicated that all allegations are thoroughly investigated to the best of the facility's ability. The policy also indicated that the individual conducting the investigation reviews documentation and evidence; reviews the resident's medical records; interviews the person(s) reporting the incident, and interviews available staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident. Review of Resident R4's October 2025 physician orders included the diagnoses of cerebral infarction (a type of stroke); anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease about something with an uncertain outcome); depression (a mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is provided with the necessary behavioral health care in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of five resident records reviewed (Resident R1).Findings Include: Review of care plan for Resident R1 dated August 4, 2025, revealed that the resident was at risk to be verbally aggressive (yelling/cursing when redirected) related to dementia. Interventions included, Psychiatric/Psychogeriatric consult as indicated.Review of clinical record for Resident R1 dated July 1, 2025, revealed that the resident noted to be agitated, resident was going into other residents' rooms, several attempts were made to redirect the resident, and it was unsuccessful. Staff remained with resident for supervision, and the residents were not cooperative with therapy.Review of physician progress note dated July 9, 2025, revealed that staff reported patient had wandering and some inappropriate behaviors. Some agitation was noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies and documentation and staff interview, it was determined facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents during a mechanical lift transfer for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R2). Review of facility policy title Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, revised July 2017, revealed that at least two (2) nursing staff are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift, when possible.A review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs).A review of Resident R2's allegation of abuse incident investigation report revealed that on June 18, 2025, Employee E13, nurse aide, was providing care to Resident R2 using a sit to stand lift. The report indicated that Employee E13 was by herself when she lifted the resident and transported him into the bathroom and bumped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at the proper temperature. Findings include: Interview with Resident R80 on June 16, 2025 at 11:23am revealed that food does not taste good. Interview with Resident R230 on June 16, 2025 at 1:07pm revealed that food does not taste good and is not cooked to right temperatures, tends to be overdone or underdone depending on the dish. Interview conducted with Resident R137, during dining on June 16, 2025, at 1:27 p.m. revealed that the food was cold. During a group interview on June 18, 2025, at 10:03 p.m. when food was brought up and all the residents agreed that there were problems with the food. Residents R33, R110, and R230, stated that last week, chicken was served partially raw with visible blood. Observations during a test tray conducted with the Dietitian, Employee E9, on June 18, 2025, at 1:01 p.m. revealed pasta registered at 107.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F); green beans registered at 102.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations; review of clinical records, policies, and procedures; and staff interviews; it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints for one out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R156). Findings include: Review of Resident R156's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted in the facility on June 1, 2024, with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety (Dementia is the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Parkinson's Disease with Dyskinesia (neurological disorder that primarily affects movement, causing symptoms like tremors, stiffness, and slowness of movement), Anxiety Disorder (Anxiety disorders are a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive, persistent, and uncontrollable feelings of worry and fear), and Depression (major loss of interest in pleasurable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding practices related to labeling for one of two residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident R299). Findings include: Review of physician order for Resident R299, dated April 27, 2025, indicated, one time a day Administer Jevity 1.5 @50 ml/hr until total volume of 500 ml daily has infused . Observations on June 18, 2025, at 1:37 p.m. in Resident R299's room, revealed that the bottle of Jevity 1.5 Enteral Feed was dated June 10, 2025. Follow-up interview with the unit manager, Employee E11 at 1:39 p.m. confirmed the above-mentioned finding. Continued interview revealed that the enteral feed bottle must be discarded every 24 hours. 28 Pa Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observed, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of 35 residents reviewed (R205). Findings include: Review of physician order for Resident R205 indicated an order dated March 9, 2025; Check and change Oxygen tubing weekly and as needed, every night shift, every Saturday per protocol; date the Oxygen tubing. Review of physician order for Residnet R205 indicated an order dated May 8, 2025; Oxygen at two Litters, to keep SPO2 (pulse oxygen level) greater than 90, Every Shift for Shortness of Breath. Observation conducted on June 17, 2025, at 10:37 a.m., revealed that Resident R205 was disconnected from Oxygen tube, although the Oxygen Concentrator was running, and while the oxygen tubing was laying on the floor. At the time of the finding the same was confirmed with a Licensed Nurse, Employee E7. 28 Pa Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of three residents sampled for behavior. (Resident R130) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R130 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses to include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)(a mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event, such as a natural disaster, war, violent crime, or personal loss), anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) for Resident R130 dated April 8, 2025, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, question I6100, indicated the resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related with Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one of 14 residents reviewed (R142). Findings include: Review of literature revealed that Enhanced Barrier Precautions are infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of novel or Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms. Enhanced Barrier Precautions require to employ the use of targeted Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during high contact patient/resident activities. Review of Resident R142's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy Obstructive Unspecified (Reflux Uropathy Obstructive Unspecified refers to a condition where there's a blockage in the urinary tract that prevents normal urine flow.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the physician before the resident was discharged against medical advice (AMA) for one of one resident reviewed. (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of fracture of right lower leg, Parkinson's disease (movement disorder of the nervous system), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes (failure of the body to produce insulin), and lack of coordination,. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated, November 16, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. On January 27, 2025, at 9:02 a.m., an interview was held with the Administrator, Employee E1, and the Director of Nursing, Employee E2, who reported that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that routine dental services were provided to residents in a timely manner for one of five clinical records reviewed (Resident R1) . Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 had a scheduled appointment on February 27, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. for the extraction of tooth #19. However, the prior dental consultation on February 13, 2025, indicated that R1's Xarelto medication needed to be held for three days before the scheduled procedure. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 23-27, 2025 revealed that Xarelto was administered, with no documentation indicating that it needed to be held for Resident R1 to undergo the scheduled procedure on February 27, 2025. On February 25, 2025, at 2:26 p.m., an interview with the unit manager, Employee E4 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely provision of professional services furnished by outside providers, for one of 5 residents reviewed (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], diagnosed with Fracture of Right lower leg, Parkinson's disease (movement disorder of the nervous system) and lack of coordination. Continued review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident sustained a fall on November 5, 2024, and was diagnosed with distal right fibula fracture. Resident R1 was receiving orthopedic services and had a follow up on December 23, 2024, with a recommendation for follow up in 4 weeks. Resident R1 next follow up appointment was scheduled for February 10, 2025, which resulted in a total of 8 weeks follow up. On February 27, 2025, at 2:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing, Employee E2 confirmed that Resident R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility did not provide sufficient nursing staff at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs for 12 out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R180, R46, R155, R247, R75, R78, R137, R32, R134, R11, R161 and R7) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Call System, Residents,' revised September 2022, indicates that calls for assistance are answered in a timely fashion. Observations on Tuesday, February 4, 2025, on D3 unit, revealed call bell light on appeared at 9:45 a.m., room#304. Continued observation on D3 unit, revealed call bell light still on at 10:16 am, room#304. Interview with Resident R180, in room [ROOM NUMBER], on February 4, 2025, at 10:30 am, revealed that late call bell response time is common and he believes nurse aides quit or left to another unit. Interview with Resident R217, on February 4, 2025, unit D3, at 11:15 a.m. Interview with Resident R15, unit D2, on February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for 15 of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R114, R55, R406, R10, R268, R204, R31, R18, R285, R407, R22, R221, R182, R28 and R118). Findings include: Interview with Resident R114 on February 4, 2025, at 9:55 a.m. revealed that the food is always served cold. Interview with Resident R55 on February 4, 2025, at 9:59 a.m. revealed that he does not care for the food, it is just not good, they could do a lot better. Interview with Resident R406 February 4, 2025, at 10:03 a.m. revealed that the food does not taste good, and it is not always hot enough. Interview with Resident R268 February 4, 2025, at 10:06 a.m. revealed the food is cold, especially the scrambled eggs. He stated that the kitchen staff say it is hot when it leaves the kitchen but it takes too long to be delivered. He said that he doesn't like that the meat is served only at night and at lunch it is too much starch and cheese, not good for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were updated in a timely manner for one of 35 records reviewed related to resident's behaviors of dislodging a peg tube (Resident R237). Findings include: Review of facility undated policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered dated in March 2022 indicated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessment of resident's are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions changes. Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R237 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of benign neoplasm of stomach, Alzheimer's disease (progressive degenerative disease of the brain), Gastrostomy status, unspecified protein-calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with residents, interview with staff, and review of clinical records, it was determined that facility failed to obtained a consultation with an especialist and administered insulin medications as ordered by the physican for two of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R40 and Resident R94) Findings include: Review of Resident R40's clinical record, revealed medical history of multiple sclerosis (slow progressive disease of the cenetal nervous system), paraplegia (paralysis on the lower half of the body), lymphedema (condition of localized swelling caused by a compromised lymphatic system) and muscle weakness. Interview with Resident R40 on Tuesday, on February 4, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., revealed that she has not seen a lymphedema specialist after communicating her preference with nursing staff over past seven months. Review of Resident R40's clinical record revealed an active physician order, obtained on August 31, 2024, for lymphedema therapy consult. Further review of Resident R40's clinical record revealed physician note, dated January 23, 2025, at 3:15 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R406, R18, and R114). Findings include: Review of Resident 406's clinical record revealed diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia (the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood, leading to low oxygen levels). Review of Resident 406's clinial record failed to reveal a physician's order for oxygen therapy. Observations conducted of Resident R406's room on February 4, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. revealed Resident 406 was wearing his/her oxygen and the filter on the concentrator contained an abundance of grey, fuzz substance. Review of Resident R18's clinical record revealed diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypoxia (the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood, leading to low oxygen levels). Further review of Resident R18's clinical record revealed a September 29, 2024, physician's order for oxygen at 2 litters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure nurse aides had completed annual performance evaluation for three out of nine nurse aides reviewed (Employee E11, E12, E13) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Performance Evaluations,' revised September 2020, indicates that a performance evaluation will be completed on each employee at the conclusion of his/her 90-day probationary period, and at least annually thereafter. Request to review nurse aide performance evaluations on Wednesday, February 5, 2025, at 12:05 p.m. revealed facility was unable to provide completed performance evaluation for nurse aide, Employees E11 and E12. Request to review additional nurse aide performance evaluations on Friday, February 7, 2025, at 11:15 a.m., revealed facility was unable to provide completed performance evaluation for nurse aide, Employee E13. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address a resident's dementia care needs for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R46). Findings Include: Reviewed facility dementia policy title Dementia Clinical Protocol dated in November 2018 states that treatment/management for the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT team will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximized remain function and quality of life. Review of the admission sheet of Resident R46, revealed that Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Dementia (Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Review of Minimun Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident care needs) revealed that Resident R46 received antipsychotic (Antipsychotic medications have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon review of resident records and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication between the facility and a dialysis provider that was completed and/or available for review for three of three residents receiving dialysis (Resident R104, R139 and R230). Findings include Resident R104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with end state renal disease and was ordered to receive hemodialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday and Fridays. Hospital records revealed Resident R104 presented to the emergency on December 19, 2024, with right upper extremity erythema edema, cellulitis/abscess with purulent drainage (thick milky foul smelling drainage commonly called pus) from his fistula site, also with nonocclusive right brachial DVT (blood clot) and was placed on Vancomycin (an antibiotic used for severe infections). The correspondence/communication between the facility and dialysis center during that time period was either incomplete or not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure required in-services training was provided for one nurse aide out of nine nurse aides reviewed (Employee E14) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'In-Service Training, Nurse Aide,' revised August 2022, indicates that in-service training is based on the outcome of the annual performance review, annual in-services: are no less than 12 hours per employment year. Request to review regular in-service education for nurse aides, on Wednesday, February 5, 2025, at 12:05 pm, revealed facility unable to provide completed in-service education for nurse aide, Employee E14. 28 Pa Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures 28 Pa Code 201.20(d) Staff development
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records, job descriptions, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards, and failed to ensure hazardous materials were not accessible to a resident. This failure resulted in Resident R1 able to obtaining a disposable razor and cutting her/his wrist. The facility's failure placed Resident R1 who had a history of suicidal ideation at risk for serious injury and resulted in Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that The primary purpose of the job position is to manage the Facility in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities. To follow all facility policies and apply them uniformly to all employees. To ensure the highest degree of quality care is provided to our residents at all times. As…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, the review of the clinical record and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified regarding a resident's verbal threats of wanting to kill herself, and failed to ensure that the physician was notified when the resident reported to nursing staff that she ingested 25-30 milligrams of Tylenol for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Change in Condition, with a revision date of February 2021 indicted that the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call for reasons that include, but not limited to the following: discovery of injuries of an unknown source; the refusal of treatment or medication two or more consecutive times, an accident or incident involving the resident and a significant change in a resident's physician/emotional/mental condition. Review of the policy also indicated that the resident's representative will also be notified.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered plan of care for a resident with a history of passive suicidal ideation (thoughts of wanting to die or thinking one would be better off dead) for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findngs include: Review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of March 2022 indicated that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's conditions change. Review of the August 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function that can lead to kidney failure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); muscle weakness; anxiety (excessive, persistent and uncontrollable worry and fear about everyday situations) and depression (a mood disorder that cause persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's medications were administered in a timely manner for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Administering Medications, with a revision date of April 2019, indicated that medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience, and includes the following factors that are considered: -enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication -preventing potential medication or food interactions; and -honoring resident choices and preferences, consistent with his or her care plan Continued review of the facility policy indicated that medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Review of the physician orders for Resident R2 indicated that the resident was admitted into the facility on July 13, 2024 for rehabilitation services with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility regarding the suicide attempt of one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the job description of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicated that the primary purpose of the job description is to manage the facility in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern long term care facilities. Review of the job description of the Director of Nursing (DON) included organizing and directing administration, nursing services and resident care, in addition to developing, organizing, implementing and evaluating and directing the day-to-day functions of the Nursing Services Department, it programs and activities. Review of the August 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation related to a resident's mental health status for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the August 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function that can lead to kidney failure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); muscle weakness; anxiety (excessive, persistent and uncontrollable worry and fear about everyday situations) and depression (a mood disorder that cause persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-a periodic assessment of a resident's needs) dated July 23, 2024 indicated that the resident was assessed with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a note written by the psychologist dated April 2, 2024, at 12:21 p.m. documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff levels to provide nursing care and services for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R135, R123 and R138 ). Findings include: Review of facility's policy Answering the Call Light revised September 2022, the purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely response to the resident's request and needs. Answer the resident call system within 5-15 minutes. An interview with Resident R135 on March 18, 2024, at 1:17 p.m. revealed that many times they must wait a long time to get change because they are short staff with nursing aides day and night shifts. Daily shift has two nurse aides and night shift has one nurse aide for 27 residents on D2 unit. An interview with Resident R123 on March 18, 2024, at 12:49 p.m. revealed that it a one hour waiting time to get your call bell answered because it one nurse aide only for 13 residents. An interview with Registered Nurse, unit manger, Employee E16, on March 18, 2024, at 1:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not employ sufficient staff to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services and that meals were served timely in one of three dining rooms (Second floor). Findings include: Observation of lunch meal service on March 18, 2024 at 12:15 p.m. revealed eighteen residents seated in the dining room waiting for lunch. All residents were offered a beverage. At 12:30 p.m., Food Service staff, Employee E17 pushed a cart into the dining room with eight bowls of soup. Seven residents were seated at a table and only one resident received a bowl of soup. At 12:45 p.m., Employee E17 pushed in a cart of eight more bowls of soup. At 12:55 p.m. the final resident received a bowl of soup. Resident R134 stated the soup is not hot. Employee E17, picked up the bowl of soup and went into the pantry where she reheated the soup in the microwave. She brought the soup out to Resident R134 who stated, yes, the soup was hot It's fine. Again, Employee E117 came from the pantry with eight entrees and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the Food and Nutrition Services, reviews of policies and procedures and food committee meeting minutes, and interviews with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received foods and beverages that were palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R123, R11, R134, R135 and R69) and in two of six nursing units. (D2 second floor, and B2 second floor Findings include: A review of facility documentation titled HACCP Daily Tasty Panel Chart log on March 21, 2024, stated that recommended serving temperatures to ensures hot or cold food at of consumption: soup, sauces, gravies, vegetables 160 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F), meat, poultry, seafood and eggs 145 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and cold food below 40 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and other entrees 160 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A review of facility policy title Food Holding Temperature Requirements: states that food temperatures should be taken prior to service to ensure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews with residents, it was determined the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan related showers to one of ten residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting states Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the following diagnoses Cerebral infarction (a disruption of blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), Muscle Weakness, Abnormalities of gait, Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), Fibromyalgia (a chronic (long-lasting) disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body, as well as fatigue and trouble sleeping). Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment date September 9, 2023 of resident care needs) revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and facility policy determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to one residents required assistants with activities of daily living for one of four resident records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered revised December 2016 indicated care plans will include measurable objectives and timeframes, describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of July 12, 2023 diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, (a chronic disease of the central nervous system) polyneuropathy (malfunction of multiple nerves throughout the body), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R1's admissions MDS (an assessment of resident needs) dated July 17, 2023 indicated the resident had impairments to one side of her upper body and both sides of her lower extremities and required extensive assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain intravenous (IV) devices in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four resident records reviewed (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of facility policy, Peripheral IV Dressing Changes revised on April 2016, revealed the purpose of the policy was to prevent catheter related infections associated with contaminated, loosened, or soiled catheter-site dressings. The policy continues to state the IV dressing should be changes every 5-7 days and to document the date, time, type of dressing, reason for dressing change, any complications, interventions related to insertion cite and/or surrounding area and the resident's response to the procedure. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], diagnosed with right shoulder septic arthritis, and received intravenous antibiotics, Cefepime and Vancomycin via the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-24 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records requested by/and or on behalf of residents were provided in a timely manner for 3 out of 3 records reviewed. (Resident R1, Resident R2, and R3)Review of the facility policy, Release of Information, with a revision date of November 2009 indicated that the resident may initiate a request to release information to anyone he/she wishes and that such request will be honored only upon the receipt of written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative. The policy also stated that a resident may have access to his or her records within 24 hours (excluding weekends or holidays) of the resident's written request. Continued review of the policy indicated that a resident may obtain photocopies of his or her records by providing the facility with at least a forty-eight hour (excluding weekends and holidays) advanced notice of such request, and that a fee may be charged for copying services. Review of a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-02-07 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers to the hospital and that a resident's representative was made aware of a facility-initiated transfer, for two of eight residents reviewed. (Residents R67 and R237) Findings Include: Review of nursing notes for Resident R67 dated November 10, 2024, at 10:18 a.m. revealed that the resident had a unwitnessed fall and was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Further review revealed a note, dated October 8, 2024, at 11:16 p.m., which indicated that Resident R67 was admitted to the local hospital for feeling nauseous and dizzy and was observation with syncope. Further record review for another Residents R237 revealed that November 24, 2024, at 3:14 p.m. revealed that resident pulled the hypodermoclysis out and family wanted to send resident to hospital to be evaluated. Further review revealed a note, dated June 11, 2024, at 10:19 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$114,699 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-01-08
- $97,354 — penalty dated 2024-08-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1425 HORSHAM SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/26/2020 |
| CHRH EQUITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/20/2021 |
| CS HORSHAM HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/2020 |
| CW HORSHAM HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2021 |
| ENS HOLDING GROUP II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/20/2021 |
| ENS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/20/2021 |
| THE ENS FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/20/2021 |
| YMCS EQUITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/20/2021 |
| GOTTESMAN, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/20/2021 |
| COASTAL STATES BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/26/2020 |
| FIRSTRUST SAVINGS BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/26/2020 |
| GREYSTONE SERVICING COMPANY, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/26/2020 |
| HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/26/2020 |
| SYNOVOUS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/26/2020 |
| KLITNICK, YECHIEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/22/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/20/2021 |
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396078. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.