Southwestern Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation
500 North Lewis Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15122 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (412) 466-0600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $60,520 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.7% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.1% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 14.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.7% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.0%CMS range 31.5–53.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.9–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.4–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 77.7 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies clinical records, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment by failing to identify signs and symptoms of constipation in one of five residents reviewed (Resident R28), resulting in actual harm by admissions to the hospital and failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of wounds for four of six residents (Resident R4, R11, R12, and R29). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bowel Regimen Protocol dated 11/30/23, indicated the following will be instituted for constipation: (1) bowel movements are to be recorded by nursing staff in the electronic health care record. (2) if there is no bowel movements by the completion of the third day: (a) Milk of Magnesia (MOM- laxative) will be administered at bedtime. (b) if there is no bowel movement following administration of MOM, Dulcolax suppository (solid medication that enters the body through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records and documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect for one of four residents (Resident R2), that resulted in actual harm of a low leg skin tear. Findings include: Review of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 42 CFR §483.12. Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 11/30/23, indicated that residents have the right to be free from abuse and neglect. Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated 11/30/23, indicated appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for four of seven residents (Resident R1, R12, R13, and R14) and failed to prevent avoidable pressure ulcer development that resulted in the actual harm of a new pressure ulcer for one of seven residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality's, Safety Program for Nursing Home: On-Time Pressure Ulcer Prevention dated May 2016, indicated that Pressure ulcers cause pain, disfigurement, and increased infection risk and are associated with longer hospital stays and increased morbidity and mortality. Three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers were listed: comprehensive skin assessments, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessments, and care planning and implementation to address areas of risk. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from injury that resulted in actual harm of a lower leg skin tear for two of four residents (Resident R2 and R10). Findings include: Review of facility policy Safety and Supervision of Residents date d 11/30/23, indicated that, resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated 11/30/23, indicated appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance. Review of Resident R2's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 3/27/24, included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to verify the dish washing temperature and staff education on the use of chemical sanitation to prevent the potential for cross contamination and failed to store food products in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the main kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 1/21/25 beginning at approximately 10:15 a. m., of the Main Kitchen the following concerns were identified: The dish machine was identified as high temperature, however, according to Dietary Aide(DA) Employee E3 who was assisting in running the dish machine with DA Employee E4 stated that the dish machine elements were not working and the machine was currently functioning as a low temp with chemicals used for sanitation. During an interview on 1/21/25, at 10:20 a.m., Dietary Aides were asked to run a strip through the machine to show the level of sanitation. Neither employee stated that they were not trained how to run the strips and had not done so prior to using the machine. During an interview on 1/21/25, at 10:45 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of staff education records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for four of four nurse aides (Employees E6, E7, E8, and E9). Finding include: Review of education records for Employees E6, E7, E8, and E9 revealed the following: Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 had a hire date of 9/16/21, with approximately 10.25 hours of in-service education between 9/16/23, and 9/16/24. NA Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/4/12, with approximately 9.75 hours of in-service education between 10/4/23, and 10/4/24. NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 10/14/13, with approximately 10.00 hours of in-service education between 10/14/23, and 10/14/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, with approximately 6.75 hours of in-service education between 8/15/23, and 8/15/24. During an interview on 1/24/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide the required 12 hours annual in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) assessments were accurate and fully completed for seven of eight residents without a BIMS assessment completed (Resident R7, R21, R22, R24, R38, R43, and R60). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing MDS Assessments dated October 2018, and updated October 2024, indicated that Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, or it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. Section D: Mood, Question D0100 Should Resident Mood Interview Be Conducted? should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, and or it should be coded 1, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on abuse and neglect prevention for three of nine staff members (Employee E9, E13, and E14). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on abuse and neglect prevention. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, failed to have abuse and neglect prevention in-service education between 8/15/24, and 8/15/24. Registered Nurse Employee E13 had a hire date of 10/6/22, failed to have abuse and neglect prevention in-service education between 10/6/23, and 10/6/24. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E14 had a hire date of 9/6/22, failed to have abuse and neglect prevention in-service education between 9/6/23, and 9/6/24. During an interview on 1/24/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on abuse and neglect prevention for three of nine staff members. 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (written instructions such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for three of the eight residents reviewed (Resident R41, R75, and R77). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Advanced Directives last reviewed 11/5/24, indicated the facility will comply with the requirements related to maintaining written policies and procedures regarding advance directives, including provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive. A review of the medical record indicated Resident R41 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, high blood pressure, and heart failure (heart cannot pump or fill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessments completed indicating a change in condition of a resident requiring change in care) assessment for one of four residents reviewed (Residents R27). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (reference used to complete an MDS) effective October 2024, indicated that the facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], included diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological disorder caused by thiamine deficiency, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services after hospitalization for one of three residents (Resident R27). Review of the facility policy, Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration dated 11/5/24, previously dated 11/30/23, indicated the facility will strive to provide adequate hydration and to prevent dehydration. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/14/24, included diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological disorder caused by thiamine deficiency, and marked by mental confusion, abnormal eye movements, and unsteady gait) and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs used without adequate indications for use for one of five residents. (Resident R23). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Use: Psychotropic dated 11/5/24, indicated; Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Review of Resident R23's admission record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of care needs) assessment dated [DATE], included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disease that affects central nervous system), dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) without behaviors, and anxiety. Review of Section N: Medications revealed Resident R23 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on infection control for one of nine staff members (Employee E13). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on infection control. Registered Nurse Employee E13 had a hire date of 10/6/22, failed to have infection control in-service education between 10/6/23, and 10/6/24. During an interview on 1/24/25, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on infection control for eight of nine staff members. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and date food, maintain refrigerator temperature logs, and maintain cleanliness in two of two nursing unit nutrition rooms (First and Second floor nursing units). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Food Receiving and Storage dated 11/30/23, indicated that all food items are placed in the refrigerator located at the nurse's station and labeled with a use by date. All foods belonging to residents are labeled with the resident's name, the item, and the use by dated. Partially eaten food is not kept in the refrigerator. During an observation of the Second-floor nutrition room on 5/30/24, at 2:09 p.m. revealed the following: -April 2024 refrigerator temperature log was missing daily temperature assessments on 11 of 30 days. -May 2024 refrigerator temperature log was missing daily temperature assessments on 11 of 29 days. -(1) package of breakfast cereal stored under the sink. -(1) partially consumed, undated bottle of apple juice. -(2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and resident care records, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 22 of 47 residents (R1, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, and R27). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Activity of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated 1/30/24, indicated appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene, mobility, elimination (toileting), dining, and communication. Review of the facility policy Answering the Call Light dated 1/30/24, indicated the facility procedure is to ensure timely responses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program, including additional training topics based on the resident population, outcome of the facility assessment, or non-common procedures for three of six staff members sampled (RN Employee E12, LPN Employee E15 and E16). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 11/30/23, indicated the facility included under the section, Acuity - Frequency of Potentially High-Risk Treatments that surgical drains are a type of care provided. Within the subsequent section, Acuity - Care requirements the assessment indicated staff competencies were required. No further information was available describing what type of education would be provided. Review of physicians' orders dated from 6/1/23, through 5/31/24, revealed two residents had orders provided for the care of a Jackson Pratt drain (JP drain, a surgical suction drain that gently draws fluid from a wound to help the resident recover after surgery). Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of nursing job descriptions, facility documents, clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that licensed nurses displayed the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing services for one of two residents (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of the facility provided Registered Nurse (RN) job description titled, Staff Nurse (RN) indicated the RN nurse is responsible for competent administration of care and treatments according to physician orders and facility policy and procedure. Review of the facility provided Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description titled, LPN Supervisor indicated the LPN must demonstrate knowledgeable of nursing and medical practices and procedures. Review of the Facility Assessment dated 11/30/23, indicated surgical drains as a type of care provided by the facility. Review of the [NAME] The Art and Science of Person-Centered Care, 9th edition dated 11/9/18, included in the steps for care for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services and failed to make certain appropriate treatment, and services for dementia were provided to one of four residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the National Library of Medicine document, Sundowning in Dementia dated 12/27/16, defined sundowning as the emergence or worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in the late afternoon or early evening. It represents a common manifestation among persons with dementia and is associated with several adverse outcomes (such as institutionalization, faster cognitive worsening, and greater caregiver burden). Review of the facility policy, Dementia - Clinical Protocol dated 11/30/23, indicated for the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT (interdisciplinary care team will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life. Nursing assistants will receive initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, physician records, documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule ordered appointments and failed to provide transportation for one of three residents (Resident R11), which resulted in the actual harm of a delay in cancer treatment. Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2023, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of information provided by the U.S. National Institutes of Health; National Cancer Institute indicated a port (commonly referred to as a port-a-cath) is a device that is usually placed under the skin in the right side of the chest. It is attached to a catheter (a thin, flexible tube) that is threaded into a large vein above the right side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential of infection and/or reinfection occurring for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 11/30/23, indicated the facility maintains an Infection Prevention and Control Program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable dieases and infections. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/20/24, included diagnoses of osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection), peripheral vascular disease (PVD, circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and diabetes (a metabolic disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to protect the right of resident personal privacy and confidentiality of medical records for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Protected Health Information (PHI), Safeguarding Electronic last reviewed 11/30/23, informed this facility ensures the confidentiality, integrity and availability of all e-PHI created, maintained, received, or transmitted by our information system. Employees and staff have access to e-PHI only to the degree that such access is appropriate for their job requirements and responsibilities. Review of Resident R1's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 2/8/24. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis (the space inside of the backbone is too small, causing pressure on the spinal cord and nerves), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was it was determined that the facility failed to correctly apply elastic ACE wraps for one of four residents (Resident R74) and failed to follow physician's orders for two of four residents (Resident R60, R74, and R89). Findings include: Review of Resident R60's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/6/23, included diagnoses of abnormality of gain and mobility and atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, bilateral legs (narrowing of the arteries in both of the legs). Review of an active physician order dated 10/12/23, indicated Resident R60 should have ACE wraps applied to both legs, wrapped from toes to below the knee, on in the morning and off at the hour of sleep. During observations completed on 12/14/23, at 9:50 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 1:40 p.m., and 3:30 p.m. and on 12/15/23, at 9:00 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. all revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide prescribed treatments for three of four residents (Resident R46, R49 and R63). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol last reviewed 11/30/23, indicated the nursing staff will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers. It also indicated that the nurse will describe and document: full assessment of pressure indicating location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudate (drainage) or necrotic (dying) tissue. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/18/23, included the diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles) and lymphedema (the build-up of fluid in soft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0710 — patternObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, resident record reviews, resident interviews and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for smoking and to ensure the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for eight of eight residents (Residents R2, R5, R31, R32, R55, R56, R70, and R199). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents last reviewed 11/30/23, informed the facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices. The staff shall consult with the attending physician and the director of nursing services to determine if safety restrictions need to be placed on a resident's smoking privileges based on the safe smoking evaluation. Review of the facility's list of residents who smoke included Residents R2, R5, R31, R32, R55, R56, R67, R70 and R199. Review of Resident R2's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility 9/6/18. Diagnoses included left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility observations, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to routinely offer evening snacks or provide snacks as requested for seven of seven residents (Resident R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505 and R506). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Snacks/Hydration last reviewed 11/30/23, informed it is the [facility's] policy to provide the following: 1) Bulk snacks and beverages to be available for residents upon request located at each resident care area, 2) snacks to residents in which their individual plan of care specifies, and 3) offer all residents a bedtime snack. Food Service Department assembles bulk snack items and beverages and delivers them to resident care areas and to be offered as bedtime snack to each resident care areas. During a resident group meeting conducted on 12/12/23, at 1:30 p.m. Residents R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, and R506 reported snacks are not given at bedtime, or even when they ask for a snack. Resident R501 reported buying their own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the agency failed to maintain surveillance data and analysis for four of ten months (August, September, October, and November 2023) which caused six reportable infections not to be documented for five residents (Resident R5, R12, R23, R67, and R197). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 11/30/23, previously reviewed 10/31/22, indicated that surveillance tools are used for recognizing the occurrence of infections, recording their number and frequency, detecting outbreaks and epidemics, monitoring employee infection, monitoring adherence to infection prevention and control practices, and detecting unusual pathogens with infection control implications. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, resident interviews and staff interviews, it was determined the facility impeded residents' ability to meet or organize a resident or family group and failed to provide a designated staff person responsible for providing assistance and respond to written requests that result from group meetings for 10 of 11 months (1/23, 2/23, 3/23, 4/23, 5/23, 6/23, 7/23, 8/23, 9/23, and 10/23). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Resident Council last reviewed 11/30/23, informed the facility supports the residents' rights to organize and participate in the resident council. The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility, Council meetings are scheduled monthly or more frequently if requested by residents. During a resident group meeting conducted on 12/12/23, at 1:30 p.m. seven residents were in attendance. Resident R500, Resident R502, Resident R503, and Resident R504 voiced concerns that a resident council meeting had not been held in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0575 — isolatedPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to display the contact information (name, address, email address, and phone number) for the local State Survey Agency and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation on 3 of 3 resident information areas (Reception, 100 unit and 200 unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Contact with External Agencies last reviewed 11/30/23, informed residents have unrestricted access to officials from outside agencies. Residents are not prohibited in any way from communicating with officials or agencies that are independent from or have oversight of the facility. These agencies/individuals include (but are not limited to): federal or state surveyors; federal or state health department employees; and/or any adult protection or advocacy agency employees or representatives. Contact information for resident advocacy agencies and services is posted in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of four residents (Resident R59). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 11/30/23, indicated the nurse will notify the resident's physician when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included right knee replacement, syncope (fainting caused by low blood pressure), mood disorder, and cognitive impairment. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) resident assessment dated [DATE], indicated the diagnoses remain current. A review of a nurse note dated 12/2/23, at 1:26 p.m., indicated resident R96 had been awake for over a day and combative and non-compliant with care and unable to follow simple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to issue the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice form published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (SNF ABN CMS-10055) which provides information to residents/resident representatives so they can decide if they wish to continue skilled nursing services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility for one of three residents (Resident R700). Findings include: A review of Resident R700's clinical record documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. A review of the SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form CMS-20052 (published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and used to determine if nursing care facilities are in compliance with notifying residents/resident representatives of a termination/denial/resident discharge from Medicare Part A services) documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide grievance forms for filing anonymous grievances on one of two units (100 unit). Findings include: During an observation on 12/11/23, at 11:35 a.m. the 100 unit grievance form receptacle did not contain grievance forms available to file an anonymous grievance. During an interview on 12/12/23, at 11:40 a.m. Unit Secretary Employee E5 confirmed confirmed the facility failed to make certain grievance forms for filing anonymous grievances were available to residents on the 100 unit. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e)(4) Management 28 Pa. Code: 201.29(i) Resident Rights
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident record, observation, resident interview and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for thirteen of 43 residents (Resident R28, R22, R40, R29, R46, R201, R200, R250, R50, R81, R1, R90 and R15). Findings include: Based on review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) last reviewed 11/30/23, informed residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident R28's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/16/23, included the diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and muscle wasting. During an observation on 12/12/23, at 9:18 a.m. Resident R28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, staff record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified Activities Director to oversee the activities department for all 101 current residents in the facility. Findings include: Based on a review of facility policy titled Activity Program last reviewed 11/30/23, informed our activity programs are staffed with personnel who have appropriate training and experience to meet the needs and interests of each resident. Our activities programs are under the direct supervision of a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreational specialist or an activities professional who is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the state in which practicing: AND is eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreational specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body; OR has two years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years; OR is a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant; OR has completed a training course approved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed pharmacy recommendations for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Regimen Review, dated 11/30/23, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a medication regimen review and provides a written report to the physician for any irregularity. The physician documents in the medical record in a timely manner that the irregularity has been reviewed and what action was taken to address it. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia and insomnia. Review of the MDS (Minimum data set- resident assessment and care screening) dated 10/27/23, indicated the diagnoses remain current. Review of Resident R36's clinical record revealed that the facility's pharmacist made recommendations to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Facility Assessment annually. Findings include: A review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 10/31/22, through, 10/31/23, revealed the facility did not complete the template to indicate accurate information on: For the sections titled Function Care Requirements instructions for completing the template indicated to address in the description: -Types of care required. -Services required. -Staff/Personnel required. -Staff competencies required. -Physical plant environment required - such as campus buildings and physical structures. -Medical and non-medical equipment required (including vehicles). -Health information technology resources required - such as systems for electronically managing patient records and electronically sharing information with other organizations. -Policies and procedures required in the provision of care to meet current professional standards. A description of this section with this information was not included in the Facility Assessment, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of activity calendars, resident group interview, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the activity needs for two of two nursing units (First and Second Floor) Findings include: During the resident group meeting on 2/11/23, at 1:00 a.m., revealed that three out of three residents agreed that there is not much to do, most evening activites do not occur, and there is not a way to go on any outings outside of the facility. During a review of the resident council meeting minutes for the last six months showed that the residents wished for more things to do. During a review of the facility provided activity calendar for 2/10/23, the 6:00 p.m. activity was to be a movie. During an observation of the activity room on the second floor from 6:00 p.m., through 7:30 p.m., revealed that no one was in the activity room and the television was off. During a review of the facility provided activity calendar for 2/11/23, the 2:00 p.m. activity was to be a craft (unspecified) and the 6:30 p.m. activity was to be a card game of UNO.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-12 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of federal code, facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Activities Department had a qualified director to oversee the activities program. The findings include: Review of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §483.24(c)(2) indicted the activities program must be directed by a qualified professional. Review of facility documentation and an interview indicated that the facility has not had an Activity Director employed since 8/8/22. During an interview on 2/11/23, at 4:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed she is filling in until the faiclity can hire an Activity Director. During an interview on 2/12/23, at 1:45 p.m., Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility did not employ an Activity Director to oversee the Activites Department. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store drugs and biological properly on one of two medication rooms (100 Unit) and one of two medication carts (F Hall Cart). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Medication Storage, dated 10/31/22, indicated that the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner including Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Manufacturer recommendations for pneumococcal vaccine indicate that the biological should be refrigerated between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit and is only stable at temperatures up to 77 degrees Fahrenheit for up to 4 days. Manufacturer guidelines for Lantus, Humalog,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely offer bedtime snacks for seven of seven residents (Resident R3, R26, R57, R59, R 500, R 501, and R 502). Findings include: During a resident group interview on 12/11/23, at 11:10 a.m., the residents indicated that that they do not receive bedtime snacks. Residents stated that there are snacks available in the vending machine but that it is expensive. During an interview on 12/12/23, at 9:37 a.m., Dietary Manager Employee E1 stated that dietary provides a bin of snacks daily to the nursing units at approximately 8:30 p.m., and that nursing is responsible for offering and passing the snacks. During an observation on 12/12/23, at 10:05 a.m., of the First floor and Second floor Pantry, bins of snacks were available and in large supply. During an interview on 2/12/23, at 1:15 p.m. Resident R3 stated she does not consistently receive a snack at bedtime but that she would like to have one. I only got a snack about five times in the past month. During an interview on 2/12/23, at 1:18 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment and store foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of two nursing units (100 Unit.) Findings include: The facility policy Foods Brought by Family/Visitors dated 10/31/22, states food or beverage brought in to consume later will be labeled, sealed in containers and containers will be labeled with the resident ' s name, the item, and a use by date. During an observation on 2/10/23 at 5:10 p.m. of the 100-unit pantry revealed the following: Five packets of thick-n-easy (a drink thickening agent) in drawer dated best by 7/9/22. In the upper cabinet, an opened bag of cheese crackers, unlabeled or dated, and a loaf of bread with a best by date of [DATE]. In the refrigerator was a container marked pork with no date. A container marked chicken with no date. Two styrofoam bowls of cake with no dates. A container with shrimp in it with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all residents were granted privacy in opening their mail for one of three residents in resident council (Resident R900), and for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R51). Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights dated 2/17/21, and 10/31/22, states that residents have the right to communicate in person and by mail, email, and telephone with privacy. During the resident council meeting on 2/11/23, at 11:10 a.m. Resident R900 reported that the facility has previously opened his mail from the credit union without his permission. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/26/22, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease affecting pumping action of the heart muscles impacting circulation, swelling and shortness of breath), high blood pressure, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage in a timely manner, for one of three residents (Resident R52). Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care receive from skilled nursing facility is ending and how you can contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) dated 1/1/20, indicated that A Medicare provider or health plan must deliver a completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing, home health (including psychiatric home health), comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, and hospice services. The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end or the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. Review of the facility provided NOMNC form indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of four resident room hallways (2nd floor 207 hallway) Findings include: During an observation on 2/10/23, from 4:50 through 5:30 p.m., the following was noted: -paint scuffs along both side of the hallway at wheelchair level -missing paint along the handrails on both sides of the hallway -the tile floor outside and between room [ROOM NUMBER]-213 is cracked and uneven in the middle of the hallway. During an interview on 2/10/23, at 5:45 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E4, confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrators responsibility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, facility provided documentation and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of funds for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R51). Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Abuse and Neglect Prevention Program dated 2/17/21, defines misappropriation of resident property as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Examples include but are not limited to: stealing, cashing checks without permission. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/26/22, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease affecting pumping action of the heart muscles impacting circulation, swelling and shortness of breath), high blood pressure, and depression. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, national accepted guidelines for Pressure Ulcers, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the development and accurately assess pressure ulcers for two of five residents (Resident R2 and Resident R56). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol last reviewed 10/31/22, indicated the nursing staff will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers. It also indicated that the nurse will describe and document: full assessment of pressure indicating location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudate (drainage) or necrotic (dying) tissue. The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) defines Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) as inflammation and erosion of the skin caused by prolonged exposure to moisture and its contents, including, urine, stool, perspiration, wound exudate, mucus or saliva; occurs in the perineum (area between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of facility provided documents, review of facility diet manual and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate diet to meet the needs for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of the facility approved diet manual indicated a Mechanical Soft Meat and Mechanical Soft Ground Meat diet contain foods of an appropriate consistency of foods that have been altered in which can be more easily chewed and managed by a person with dysphagia. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R11 was admitted to the facility 10/26/10. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs)dated 8/8/22, included diagnoses of cerebral palsy (condition of impaired muscle conditions), aphasia (language disorder affecting the ability to communicate), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Review of a physician order dated 11/14/21, indicated Resident R11 was to receive a regular mechanical soft diet with thin liquids, puree fruits, to be fed in an upright position with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of hospice contracts, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility received the required information from and communicated with the contracted hospice provider for one of two residents receiving hospice services (Resident R92) Findings include: An agreement between the facility and a hospice provider (provider of end-of-life services), dated 12/30/15, revealed that the hospice will designate an interdisciplinary group and ensure services as furnished in accordance with the Hospice plan of care. The Hospice shall furnish the facility with a copy of the plan of care and that hospice shall maintain the Hospice Plan of Care, including services provided by the hospice staff, in a separate section in the nursing facility clinical record and ensure it contains the following information: Election of Hospice Care Form, MDS assessments, physician certification of terminal illness form, Election Statement, Hospice Interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that a pneumococcal immunization was offered to two of seven residents (R45 and R90). Findings include: The facility policy Pneumococcal Vaccine dated 10/31/22, indicated Residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) document, Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate last reviewed 1/24/22, indicated that CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 65 years or older, and for adults 19 through [AGE] years old who have certain chronic medical conditions or other risk factors. Included in this list were: alcoholism, chronic liver disease, chronic lung disease, chronic renal failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide handrails in a safe and functional environment for residents use in corridors in one four resident room hallways (2nd floor 207 hallway) Findings include: During an observation on 2/10/23, from 4:45 p.m. through 5:30 p.m. the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was separated at the connector adjoining the wall and the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was uneven. During an interview on 2/10/23, at 5:45 p.m Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E4, confirmed the above finding. 28 Pa. Code 205.9(a) Corridors.
- No harm found · C2025-01-24 · tag F0848 — widespreadProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's admission and financial agreement and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident or his or her representative, and the facility agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator. Findings include: Review of facility's admission Agreement packet, which contained the document admission and Financial Agreement indicated that the Indemnification statement in the agreement indicated that the facility will not be indemnified or held harmless from injury to or death of any person or other resident, or for any damage to or loss of the property of any person or resident, caused by the acts or omissions of Resident to the fullest extent of the law. The facility's admission and financial agreement failed to identify the indemnification statement as an arbitration agreement and provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties as one is designated in the facility arbitration agreement, in accordance with §483.70(n)(2)(iii). Regulatory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-24 · tag F0946 — widespreadProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on compliance and ethics for nine of nine staff members (Employee E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, and E14). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on compliance and ethics. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 had a hire date of 9/16/21, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 9/16/23, and 9/16/24/24. NA Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/4/12, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 10/4/23, and 10/4/24. NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 10/14/13, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 10/14/23, and 10/14/24/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education between 8/15/24, and 8/15/24. Central Supply Employee E10 had a hire date of 11/3/21, failed to have compliance and ethics in-service education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-24 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for eight of nine staff members (Employee E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E13, and E14). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on behavioral health. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 had a hire date of 9/16/21, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 9/16/23, and 9/16/24/24. NA Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/4/12, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 10/4/23, and 10/4/24. NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 10/14/13, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 10/14/23, and 10/14/24/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 8/15/24, and 8/15/24. Central Supply Employee E10 had a hire date of 11/3/21, failed to have behavioral health in-service education between 11/3/23, and 11/3/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-24 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for eight of nine staff members (Employee E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E13, and E14). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on effective communication. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 had a hire date of 9/16/21, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 9/16/23, and 9/16/24/24. NA Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/4/12, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 10/4/23, and 10/4/24. NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 10/14/13, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 10/14/23, and 10/14/24/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 8/15/24, and 8/15/24. Central Supply Employee E10 had a hire date of 11/3/21, failed to have effective communication in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-24 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for eight of nine staff members (Employee E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E12, and E14). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on resident rights. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 had a hire date of 9/16/21, failed to have resident rights in-service education between 9/16/23, and 9/16/24/24. NA Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/4/12, failed to have resident rights in-service education between 10/4/23, and 10/4/24. NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 10/14/13, failed to have resident rights in-service education between 10/14/23, and 10/14/24/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, failed to have resident rights in-service education between 8/15/24, and 8/15/24. Central Supply Employee E10 had a hire date of 11/3/21, failed to have resident rights in-service education between 11/3/23, and 11/3/24. Activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for eight of nine staff members (Employee E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, E13, and E14). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on QAPI. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 had a hire date of 9/16/21, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 9/16/23, and 9/16/24/24. NA Employee E7 had a hire date of 10/4/12, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 10/4/23, and 10/4/24. NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 10/14/13, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 10/14/23, and 10/14/24/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 8/15/22, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 8/15/24, and 8/15/24. Central Supply Employee E10 had a hire date of 11/3/21, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 11/3/23, and 11/3/24. Activities Assistant Employee E11 had a hire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-15 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to facility staff. Finding include: Review of the facility provided education documents and sign-in sheets revealed that the facility did not provide mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. During an interview on 12/15/23, at 3:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide QAPI training to facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.20(c) Staff Development.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$60,520 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $60,520 — penalty dated 2024-06-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOUTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/30/2021 |
| CH PA7 SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/30/2021 |
| ENS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/11/2021 |
| SK SW OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/30/2021 |
| THE ENS FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/11/2021 |
| GOTTESMAN, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/11/2021 |
| DELP, SARA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/05/2023 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/11/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $687K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395742. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.