Seton Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 266 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 115.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food and maintain sanitary conditions in the dry storage area of the kitchen, and in nursing unit nourishment rooms and refrigerators. (Long Term Care, Rehabilitation, and Memory Care) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, dated December 17, 2025, revealed that food left for the resident to consume later would be labeled in a manner that was clearly distinguishable from facility-prepared food, and nursing staff were to label items with the resident's name, item and the use by date. It was then to have been discarded after five days. Observations during tours of the kitchen revealed the following: On February 10, 2026, at 10:20 a.m., in the food preparation area, a measuring cup was observed inside a bulk container of modified food starch with an unsealed, loose-fitting lid. On February 11, 2026, at 11:35 a.m., the bulk container of modified food starch still had an unsealed, loose-fitting lid. In the dry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for four of 24 sampled residents. (Residents 4, 7, 15, 38)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included a history of a stroke, aphasia (impaired speech production and language comprehension), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The Minimum Data Set assessment, dated January 21, 2026, indicated that the resident had an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted into the abdomen to use for nutrients, medications, and fluids directly to a person's gastrointestinal system). A physician's order dated January 20, 2026, directed staff to flush the enteral feeding tube with 100 milliliters (ml) of water every six hours. Observations on February 11, 2026, at 12:25 p.m., revealed that Resident 4 was in bed and connected to a programmable enteral feeding pump system with nutrients and water running. A date on the disposable equipment revealed this feeding was set up February 11, 2026, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained each resident's dignity for two of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 10, 88)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 had diagnoses that included a history of a stroke resulting in upper and lower extremity weakness to the dominant side of the body, aphasia (impaired speech production and language comprehension), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated December 16, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had functional impairment of the dominant side limbs, and required supervision or assistance from staff to eat in the form of intermittent cueing or steadying. Review of the resident's care plan revealed that Resident 10 required set up and supervision at all meals, was to have a plate guard at meals, and all supplies would be placed within reach.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on four of six nursing units. (B, C, D, and H)Findings include:Observations on February 10, 2026, from 11:01 a.m. through 2:10 p.m. and on February 10, 2026 from 10:00 a.m. through 12:00 p.m. revealed the following: A grey substance was observed covering the exhaust vents in the central bathing rooms in nursing units C and H. The cover was off and a grey substance was observed covering the filters of the heating/air conditioning units in resident rooms 503, 505, 603, and 705.The door was damaged on resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].A broken floor tile was observed in the doorway of resident room [ROOM NUMBER].A grey substance was observed on the filters of the oxygen concentrators in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(2.1) Management.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate catheter care was provided for one of two sampled residents with an indwelling catheter. (Resident 4) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Urinary Catheter Care, last reviewed December 17, 2025, revealed that the urinary drainage tubing should be checked to ensure that the catheter is draining properly. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included history of a stroke and dysfunction of the bladder. The Minimum Data Set assessment, dated January 21, 2026, indicated that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter for urine elimination. On January 19, 2026, the physician ordered for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the resident's care plan revealed that Resident 4's catheter bag and tubing were to be positioned below the level of the bladder. Observations on February 11, 2026, at 12:20 p.m. and 2:20 p.m., revealed that Resident 4 was in bed with the urinary catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a call bell was accessible for one of 25 sampled residents. (Resident 96) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 96 had diagnoses that included left hip fracture, Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder that affects the nervous system and causes tremors and stiffness of the body), and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated February 12, 2025, revealed Resident 96 was alert and oriented and dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), including toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan revealed that Resident 96 was at risk for falls with an intervention for staff to check that the call bell was in reach before leaving the room. On March 5, 2025, at 9:36 a.m., Resident 96 was observed in bed with the call bell on the floor next to the bed, out of reach. In an interview at that time, Resident 96 stated that the call bell could not be reached and that he did not have it for the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for two of 25 sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents 42 and 96) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 42 had diagnoses that included ambulatory dysfunction, muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance from staff for ADLs. On March 4, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., the resident was observed eating his lunch in bed. His fingernails were long, pointy, and sharp. On March 6, at 12:40 p.m., the resident was observed sitting up in bed with his nails still uncut. In an interview at that time, Resident 42 stated he would like his nails cut, and staff has not offered to do them. There were no documented refusals. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 96 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder that affects the nervous system and causes tremors…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free of accident hazards on one of three nursing units, (Cloister nursing unit) and for one of three residents who were confused and ambulatory on the nursing unit. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 resided on the Cloister nursing unit which is a locked dementia unit. Resident 1 had diagnoses that included dementia with anxiety and behavioral disturbance, mental disorder and depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment and exhibited physical, verbal and other types of behaviors that included hitting and/or grabbing at least one to three times a week. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk of attempting to eat or drink non-edible or non-consumable items. Review of nursing documentation revealed that Resident 1 was independently…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify a resident's physician of change in condition for one of four sampled residents. (Resident CR1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, last reviewed December 27, 2023, revealed that staff were to promptly notify the physician if there was a change in medical condition. Clinical record review revealed that Resident CR1 had diagnoses that included heart failure, dementia, and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). A physician's order dated October 26, 2024, directed staff to administer a medication, (Eliquis) two times a day to prevent blood-clots. On November 5, 2024, at 4:05 a.m., a nurse documented that Resident CR1 had fallen that morning at 3:10 a.m. The resident sustained a large hematoma (localized collection of clotted blood) with a lump to the right side of her forehead. According to the nurse's note at 4:10 a.m., the resident complained of pain and was medicated with Tylenol. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dignified environment, care, and services were provided to promote quality of life on three of three nursing units and in the dining room for four residents in one of three dining rooms. (Resident 1, 9, 64, 95) Findings include: Observation on the Cloister nursing unit on April 23 and 24, 2024, revealed a white board in the dining room displaying the date of April 20, 2024, and activities listed for that day. Observation on the Sub-Acute nursing unit on April 23 and 24, 2024, revealed the white boards in the residents' rooms displaying the date of April 20, 2024, and the staff listed for that day. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included dementia and depression. Review of Resident 1's current care plan revealed that the resident was on a restorative nursing program for dining and needed supervision and occasional assistance with meals. Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA