Chestnut Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1555 East End Boulevard Plains Twp, Wilkes Barre, PA 18711 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (570) 826-1011 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.4% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.0% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.4% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.9% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.8%CMS range 29.7–43.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.8–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.0–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 116.2 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse policy, clinical records, facility-provided investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to protect one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1) from non-consensual sexual contact by another resident (Resident 2) despite Resident 2's known history of documented inappropriate sexual behaviors. As a result, Resident 1 experienced actual harm when Resident 2 placed his hand underneath her clothing, touched her bare breast, and twisted her nipple, constituting non-consensual sexual contact.Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed that its purpose is to establish policy and procedures to prevent, identify, investigate, and report abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of property, and to ensure residents are actively protected from such occurrences. The policy defined sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual conduct of any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately identify a resident's request for future health care and advance directives as evidenced by one resident (Resident 73) out of 25 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of the facility Advance Directives Policy last reviewed [DATE], indicated the resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, family members, and, or legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. The resident or resident representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate an advance directive is provided in a manner that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the residents' needs for communication for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 15).Findings include: A review of the policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed that a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident 15's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Disease of the Pharynx (a disease of the muscular tube connecting the mouth and nose to the esophagus and larynx /voice box) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). An attempt at an interview on February 24,2026 at 11:45 AM in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, and facility provided documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) consistently received necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene and dignity for one resident out of 25 sampled residents (Residents 119).Findings include: A review of Resident 119's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs cannot properly move oxygen into the blood or remove carbon dioxide) and muscle wasting (the loss of muscle tissue causing reduced size, strength, and movement capability). Review of Resident 119's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 4, 2025, revealed that Resident 119 was cognitively intact with a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication for one resident out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 73).Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the Registered Nurse (RN) was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized plan to meet the toileting needs of one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 119), including the timely provision of staff assistance with toileting and management of urinary and bowel incontinence. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Urinary Continence and Incontinence Assessment and Management reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed that, as appropriate, and based on assessment of the category and causes of incontinence (inability to control the release of urine or stool) staff will provide scheduled toileting (a planned program in which staff assist the resident to use the toilet at routine, predetermined time intervals to reduce episodes of incontinence), prompted voiding (a toileting program in which staff regularly remind or ask the resident if they need to urinate and provide assistance to the toilet based on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered intravenous (giving fluids or medication directly into a vein using a needle or tube) antibiotics were administered as prescribed for one resident out of 25 sampled (Resident 73). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on January 15, 2026, revealed that medications are administered as prescribed and in a safe and timely manner. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meals). The individual administering the medication initials the resident's medication administration record (MAR) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. A clinical record review revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address dementia and dementia related behaviors displayed by one out of 25 residents reviewed. (Resident 47)Findings include: A review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 47's Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated September 19, 2025, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 47's nursing progress notes during February 2026, revealed the resident had an increase in exit seeking behaviors, culminating in the resident being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain records of controlled drugs and ensure accurate drug administration for one out of the 30 residents sampled (Resident 3).Findings include: A facility policy titled Controlled Substances last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed that the facility will comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal and documentation of controlled medications (medications regulated by federal law due to the potential for abuse, dependence, or misuse requiring strict storage, prescribing and record keeping control). The policy indicated the facility's system for reconciling the receipt, dispensing, and disposition of controlled medications includes documentation of personal access and usage, medication administration records, declining inventory records, and records for destruction, waste, or return of medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director or designee participated in the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings on a quarterly basis for two of four quarters reviewed. (Quarter 2 and Quarter 3 of 2025). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI, a facility wide program that uses ongoing review of data and care practices to identify problems, correct them, and improve the quality and safety of services provided to residents) last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed the facility would develop and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program. However, the policy did not clearly identify the required QAPI committee membership, did not specify the required participation of the Medical Director or a physician designated by the Medical Director, and did not outline attendance expectations or accountability for participation in quarterly QAPI meetings. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0810 — patternProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment as required and prescribed for three residents out of 12 sampled (Residents 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid), mild protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition caused by not getting enough calories or the right amount of protein and nutrients needed for health), and lack of coordination. A review of the physician's orders, dated January 16, 2025, revealed the resident was to utilize a Kennedy cup (lightweight, spill-proof drinking cup designed to be easy to hold and grip) with meals. Review of Resident 1's plan of care, dated June 7, 2024, indicated the resident had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem due to variable appetite, history of protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses administered medications as prescribed to three residents out of 14 sampled (Resident 1, 2, and CR1). Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the Registered Nurse (RN) was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, controlled drug records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting and the administration of controlled medications for one of 14 residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications, last reviewed on January 22, 2025, revealed that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame, and are administered within one hour of their prescribed time unless otherwise specified. As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record the date and time the medication was administered. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated March 21, 2025, for Oxycodone 10 mg (an opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), with instructions to administer one tablet three times a day for back pain. A review of the controlled substance record for Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of select facility policies, the facility's infection control log, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive infection prevention and control program and failed to implement transmission-based precautions to mitigate the spread of infectious disease for one out of the 27 residents sampled (Resident 56). Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prevention, last reviewed by the facility on January 22, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy to ensure that residents diagnosed with RSV are placed on contact precautions for the duration of the illness. A review of a facility policy titled Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, last reviewed by the facility on January 22, 2025, revealed that contact precautions are implemented for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, documentation provided by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that four residents out of 27 sampled (Residents 18, 104, 108, and 224) were free from abuse perpetrated by another resident (Residents 37 and 49) and failed to ensure one resident out of 27 sampled was free from neglect (Resident 57). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last reviewed by the facility on January 22, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that residents have the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The policy indicated the facility's resident abuse and neglect prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: (1) protect residents from abuse and neglect by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to, facility staff and other residents. A clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory care including tracheostomy (surgical procedure where a hole is created in the neck and a tube is inserted into the trachea or windpipe to help a person breathe) care was provided in accordance with physician orders for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident 2 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure (condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body) with tracheostomy and cerebral palsy (brain disorder that appears in infancy or early childhood and permanently affects body movement and muscle coordination). A physician order dated February 3, 2025, was noted for a Pulmonary Consult on February 17, 2025. Review of the Pulmonary Consult dated February 17, 2025, revealed that Resident 2 was weaned to room air (normal air without supplemental oxygen) during the appointment. The plan/medical decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately identify a resident's request for future health care and advance directives (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) as evidenced by one resident (Resident 173) out of 27 residents sampled. Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 173, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (type of arthritis that causes joints to become painful and stiff) and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). Review of Resident 173's clinical record revealed a completed and signed POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment a medical order form used to communicate a resident's preferences for life-sustaining measures across care settings) dated [DATE]. The POLST indicated that the resident elected DNR status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility policy, investigative documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident involving a fall with minor injury to determine whether neglect occurred and failed to identify that planned fall interventions were not in place for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 57). The findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last reviewed by the facility on January 22, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that residents have the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The policy indicated the facility's resident abuse and neglect prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: (1) protect residents from abuse and neglect by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to, facility staff and other residents. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of three residents out of 27 sampled (Residents 2, 40, and 47). Findings included: A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body) and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). A current physician order initially dated January 28, 2025, noted an order for Warfarin Sodium (an anticoagulant medication also known as a blood thinner) 4 mg via PEG-tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy- feeding tube placed directly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality according to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to implement nursing practices for the administration of intravenous medication via a peripheral IV (thin, flexible plastic tube inserted into a peripheral vein to allow for the administration of fluids, medications, and other therapies into the bloodstream and used for short-term intravenous therapy) for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 101). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) requires the following: The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 55). Findings include: A review of Resident 55's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety, and uncontrollable thoughts about the event). A review of the clinical record also revealed a physician's order dated March 12, 2025, for Prazosin HCL (a medication that decreases levels of norepinephrine in the central nervous system thereby reducing nightmares related to PTSD), with instructions to administer 1 mg tablet by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotics for one out of 27 residents sampled (Resident 47). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed by the facility on January 22, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy that antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The policy indicates when a resident is admitted from an emergency department, the admitting nurse will review discharge and transfer paperwork for current antibiotic and anti-infective orders. When a culture and sensitivity (C&S) is ordered, lab results and the current clinical situation will be communicated to the prescriber as soon as available to determine if antibiotic therapy should be started, continued, modified, or discontinued. A clinical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to show adequate monitoring of symptoms and potential adverse consequences of psychoactive drug use for one resident out of 27 residents sampled (Resident 45). Findings include: A review of clinical records revealed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), bipolar type (a mental health disorder that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), and Parkinson's (progressive neurological disorder that affects movement) without dyskinesia (involuntary movement disorder characterized by uncontrolled and jerky movements). A review of a facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, last reviewed by the facility on January 22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, CDC (centers for disease control) infection control guidance, facility's infection control policy and COVID-19 testing logs, and staff interview it was determined he facility failed to promptly implement infection control practices for cohorting like respiratory infections and testing for COVID-19 to prevent the spread of COVID-19 infections in the facility placing at least 12 residents (Residents 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16, 2, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28) at increased risk for contracting COVID-19 and failed to implement effective interventions to prevent the spread of COVID-19 virus. Findings include: A review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health 2023-PAHAN-694-5-11-2023 update: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for COVID-19 in healthcare settings dated May 11, 2023, revealed, this PA HAN (Pennsylvania Health alert Network) provides comprehensive information regarding infection prevention and control for COVID-19 in healthcare settings based on changes made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by nine out of the 11 residents during a resident group interview (Residents 6, 18, 24, 37, 41, 51, 83, 107, and 114). Findings include: During a resident group interview with alert and oriented residents on June 12, 2024, at 10:00 AM, the residents in attendance expressed concerns regarding the long wait times for staff to provide assistance with their care when requested/needed. During the resident group interview, Resident 6 stated that when she needs assistance for care, she waits 15 to 20 minutes for staff to provide the needed care. During the resident group interview, Resident 18 stated that she waits a very long time for staff to provide needed assistance with care. She explained that staff will sometimes initially respond to her calls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that four residents out of 30 sampled were free from physical abuse (Residents 62, 85, 97, and 119). Findings include: A facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, reviewed on April 18, 2024, revealed it is facility policy that residents have the right to be free from abuse, including physical abuse. Further policy review revealed that the administration will implement protocols to protect residents from abuse by anyone, including other residents. A clinical record review revealed Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to a resident and the resident's representative upon the resident's transfer to the hospital for eight residents out of the 27 sampled (Residents 7, 114, 101, 9, 63, 112, 2, and 106). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns, last reviewed on April 18, 2024, revealed it is the facility's policy to inform all residents and/or resident representatives in writing of the facility and state bed-hold policies. The policy indicates that all residents and resident representatives, regardless of payor source, are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence at least twice: (1) on admission and (2) at the time of transfer (if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). A clinical record review revealed that Resident 114 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services planned to maintain mobility and functional abilities of four of 27 residents sampled (Residents 63, 114, 72, and 2). Findings included: A review of facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Services, last reviewed by the facility on April 18, 2024, revealed that it is the facility policy that residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. The policy indicates restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. A review of the clinical record of Resident 63 revealed admission to the facility on September 13, 2023, with diagnoses to include cerebrovascular disease (stroke), hemiplegia (one sided paralysis - weakness) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered intravenous antibiotics were administered as prescribed for two residents out of 27 sampled (Resident 86 and 72). Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on April 18, 2024, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner. It indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI committee to inform process changes and/or the need for additional staffing. Prescribed medications are to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. Review of Resident 86's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include quadriplegia (paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documents of QA meeting attendance and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director or designee attended quarterly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for two of three quarters reviewed (August 2023 through June 2024). Findings include: A review of QAPI Committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of August 2023 through June 2024, revealed that the Medical Director or other physician was not in attendance, virtually or in-person, at the QA meetings held from October 2023 through April 2024 missing 2 quarterly meetings (October 27, 2023, and December 5, 2023). An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on June 14, 2024, at 9:00 AM, revealed that the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that the physician attended the facility's QAPI meetings on a quarterly basis as required. 28 Pa. Code 211.2 (d)(3)(4)(5)(6) Medical Director 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1)(3) Management
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and select facility policy, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for one of the 27 residents sampled (Resident 7). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, provided by the facility on April 18, 2024, indicated residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and care plan. A clinical record review revealed Resident 7 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE], with diagnoses that include acute respiratory failure (a condition where the respiratory system is unable to remove carbon dioxide from or provide oxygen to the body) and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility incident reports and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that mail was delivered unopened to one of 11 residents interviewed during a resident group interview (Resident 106). Findings include: Definitions under the regulatory guidance for §483.10(h)(2) The facility must respect the residents right to personal privacy, including the right to privacy in his or her oral (that is, spoken), written, and electronic communications, including the right to send and promptly receive unopened mail and other letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility for the resident, including those delivered through a means other than a postal service. During a resident group interview on June 12, 2024, at 11:40 AM, Resident 106 stated that he does not receive his incoming mail and packages unopened. Resident 106 stated in the past there was a mix-up with prescription medication arriving in a package from a healthcare facility addressed to him instead of being sent directly to the facility. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one resident out of 27 residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents 7). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 was transferred to a community hospital on June 8, 2024, and returned to the facility on June 10, 2024. A nursing progress note dated June 8, 2024, at 2:09 PM indicated that Resident 7 was sent to the receiving provider and sent with all appropriate paperwork. There was no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, including contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information including contact information, advance directive information, all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate, and any other documentation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely submit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the required electronic system, the CMS Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System, for one of eight sampled (Resident 72). Findings Include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], requires that discharge assessments-return anticipated (non-comprehensive) be completed no longer than the resident's discharge date + 14 calendar days. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 72 was transferred to the hospital on April 30, 2024. A progress note dated May 3, 2024, revealed that Resident 72 returned to the facility. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that an MDS discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to address a resident's active diagnoses and treatment and individualized communication methods and needs on the resident's care plan for one resident out of 27 sampled (Resident 112). Findings included: A review of Resident 112's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include diabetes, Parkinson's disease (a long-term neurodegenerative disease of mainly the central nervous system), and peripheral vascular disease (a slow, and progressive disorder of the blood vessels - PVD). A review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 5, 2023, revealed that the resident is Hispanic, Latino/a, or Spanish in origin, and that Resident 112's preferred language is Spanish (Espaniol and ) and that the resident does need - wants an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess and evaluate bladder function and implement individualized interventions to restore bladder function to the extent possible for one resident (Residents 47), andprovide care and services to prevent potential complications with the use of an indwelling foley catheter (a flexible tube which is placed into the bladder to drain urine) for one resident out of two sampled with a foley catheter (Resident 101). Findings include: Department of Health & Human Services, USA. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009, last updated June 6, 2019, III Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance, B. Maintain unobstructed urine flow. 2. Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. Review of Resident 47's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on August 9,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Basedonobservation, clinicalrecordreview, andstaffinterview itwasdeterminedthatthefacilityfailedtofailedtotimelyimplementanutritionalsupportregimentomeetthenutritionalneedsandpreventweightlossforoneresident (Resident 90) and failed toaccuratelymonitorafluidrestrictionprescribedtoaddressaresidentsclinicalconditionandmaintainfluidbalanceandadequatehydrationstatusforoneresident(Resident178) outof27 sampled. Findingsinclude AreviewofafacilitypolicyWeightAssessmentandIntervention lastreviewedbythefacilityApril18, 2024, indicatedthatresidentweightsaremonitoredforundesirableorunintendedweightlossorgain Residentsareweigheduponadmission weeklyx4 weeks andthenmonthlyorperphysicianorders Iftheweightlossis5-pounddifferencefromthelastweight areweightwillbeobtainedandvalidated Thedieticianwillreviewtheweightrecordtofollowindividualweighttrends Thethresholdforsignificantunplannedandundesiredweightlossisbasedonthefollowingcriteria a 1 month- 5% weightlossissignificant greaterthan5% issevere b 6 months- 10% weightlossissignificant greaterthan10% issevere Thepolicyfurther…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency supplies for one resident out of two sampled receiving hemodialysis (Resident 59). Findings include: According to the National Kidney Foundation, patients receiving hemodialysis should keep emergency care supplies on hand. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis to include end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood). Resident 59's clinical record indicated he was receiving hemodialysis through a right upper chest Tesio port (dialysis access site) for dialysis access every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Resident 59's clinical record revealed a physician order dated June 11, 2024, for an emergency kit at bedside for the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy and grievances lodged with the facility and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to put forth timely and sufficient efforts to promptly resolve grievances for two residents out of 22 sampled. (Resident CR1 and 11) Findings include: Review of the facility's Grievance policy and procedure provided by the facility during the survey on April 12, 2024, indicated that residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer with review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the administrator. The grievance office, administrator and staff will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the baseline care plan failed to fully address the resident's immediate individual needs for care and services upon admission of one of 22 residents sampled (Resident 111). Findings: A review of Resident 111's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with above of the knee amputations of the left and right legs. Review of the Resident 111's baseline care plan, conducted at the time of the survey ending April 12, 2024, revealed that the resident's baseline care plan did not identify the resident's bilateral above the knee amputations and resident's needs for assistance with activities of daily living as a result of the amputations, present upon admission. The resident's baseline care plan, initiated April 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems with planned interventions of to be sure my call light is within reach and encourage me to use it for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and incident reports, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one resident out of four sampled residents (Resident 110). Findings: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to reasonably accommodate residents' need for call bell accessibility for 5 out of 7 residents sampled (Residents 86, 89, 111, 118, and 119). Findings include: Observation on November 7, 2023, at 10:35AM revealed Resident 111 seated in a wheelchair along the left side of her bed. The resident's call bell was observed tucked under the mattress on the right side of her bed, out of sight and reach of the resident. During an interview at the time of the observation, Resident 111 stated that she was unable to locate her call bell to request staff assistance when needed. An interview with Employee 3 (RN nurse consultant) on November 7, 2023, at 10:40 AM confirmed the observation that Resident 111 did not have access to a call bell to summon staff assistance. Observation on November 7, 2023, at 10:45 AM revealed that Resident 119 was lying in bed unable to reach or access her call bell. The resident's call bell was wrapped around the bed frame and out of reach of Resident 119. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select investigative reports and facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement sufficient measures to protect three residents (Residents 45, 55, and 82) out of 18 sampled from physical abuse perpetrated by other residents. Findings included: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated as revised in December 2016, revealed that it is the facility's policy that residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The policy indicated that as part of resident abuse prevention, the administration will protect residents from abuse by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individual. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 18 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility investigative reports, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to assess the psychosocial status and needs of residents following incidents of abuse perpetrated by other residents to promote the psychosocial well-being of two of 18 residents sampled (Resident 45 and 82). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include lymphocytic leukemia (a type of cancer in which the bone marrow makes too many white blood cells) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated September 11, 2023, revealed that Resident 82 was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 11 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool to assess cognitive function; a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and controlled substance count records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting and administration of controlled drugs for one of three residents sampled (Resident 57). Findings include: A review of Resident 57's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on September 20, 2023, with diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), protein-calorie malnutrition, and diabetes. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated September 24, 2023, revealed that the resident was moderately impaired with a BIMS (brief interview to assess cognitive status) score of 12 (a score of 8-12 indicates moderate impairment). The resident had a physician order dated September 29, 2023, for Adderall oral tablet 10 milligram (mg), give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for attention deficit related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plan of correction from the surveys of September 28, 2023 and November 7, 2023, and the findings of the survey ending December 7, 2023, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective action plans to prevent continued quality deficiencies related to abuse prevention and pharmacy services and to ensure that plans designed to improve the delivery of care and services were consistently implemented to effectively deter future quality deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the survey ending November 7, 2023, revealed the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance monitoring systems to ensure that solutions were sustained. The results of the current survey ending December 7, 2023, revealed that two residents, Resident 1 and 2 were physically abused by Resident 3 and continued to deficient practice was identified in abuse. In response to the deficiency cited under resident abuse during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records and medication error report and staff interview it was revealed that the facility failed assure that one of three residents reviewed was free of significant medication errors (Resident 23). Findings include: The Principles of Medication Administration, The Five Rights of Medication Administration indicate that when you are giving medication, regardless of the type of medication, you must always follow the five rights. Each time you administer a medication, you need to be sure to have the: 1. Right individual 2. Right medication 3. Right dose 4. Right time 5. Right route According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) requires the following: The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills, understandings and past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on three of three resident units (First, Second, and Third Floor Nursing Units) Findings include: Observations on The First Floor Nursing Unit revealed on September 28, 2023, at 9:50 AM revealed an accummulation of dead insects on the floor at the end of the hall by the heating/cooling unit. The insects included dead stink bugs, dead ants, a dead moth, and dead beetle/roach like bugs. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a dead stink bug observed. In the soiled utility room there were multiple dead roach-like bugs along with dead ants. Observations on The Third Floor Nursing Unit revealed on September 28, 2023, at 10:35 AM revealed dirt and debris on the floor in the hallway. A used blood glucose strip was observed on the floor in the hallway. The soiled utility room had a strong foul smell. In the soiled utility room there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide services necessary to maintain good personal hygiene and grooming of residents' requiring assistance with activities of daily living for two out of five residents reviewed. (Residents 15 and 17). Findings include: A review of Resident 15's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on May 3, 2023, with diagnoses which included dementia (persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). The resident required assistance with activities of daily living, including personal hygiene, showers and bathing. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that the resident was to be showered on Monday and Thursdays during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift. A review of the resident's bathing record for September 2023 revealed that Thursday September 28, 2023, during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift staff provided the resident a bed bath instead of a shower.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide adequate supervision and follow physician's orders for measures planned to prevent accidents and promote resident safety three of 21 sampled (Resident 5, 15, and 16) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include a history of falling and orthostatic hypotension (a condition in which your blood pressure suddenly drops when you stand up from a seated or lying position). A review of a physician's order initially dated September 15, 2023, indicated the resident was to receive 15 minute checks for safety. A review documentation titled Q 15 Minute Checks revealed that on September 26, 2023, the physician ordered checks were not completed 32 times throughout the day. On September 27, 2023, the physician ordered checks were not completed six times throughout the day. A review of the clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff possessed the skills and competencies necessary to assure resident safety and administer antibiotics via a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter- long thin tube that is inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart and is used for long-term intravenous antibiotics, nutrition, or medication, and for blood draws) as evidenced by one resident out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings Include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understanding and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of controlled drug shift count records and select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate controlled medication records on two of two medication carts observed. Finding include: A review of the current facility provided policy entitled Controlled Substances revealed controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determine the count together. The oncoming and off going nurse will view the medication together to validate the medication and count is correct. A review of the facility Narcotic Count Sheet from the first floor medication cart revealed the following: September 10, 2023, the 3 pm to 11 pm off going nurse failed to sign that the narcotic count to confirm completion of the count; September 17, 2023, the 3 pm to 11 pm oncoming and the 3 pm to 11 pm off going nurse failed to sign that the narcotic count was completed. September 20, 2023, the 7 am to 3 pm oncoming and the 7 am to 3 pm off going nurse failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage of food and supplements to prevent the potential for microbial growth in food or contamination, which increased the risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: An observation on September 28, 2023, at approximately 9:55 AM of the First Floor Nursing Unit dining room revealed a functioning drawer style refrigerator and a drawer style freezer. There was no thermometer in the refrigerator or freezer to monitor for proper temperature. Upon opening the freezer a large build up of ice that had dislodged fell to the dining room floor. The inside of the freezer was soiled with a dried sticky residue on the bottom shelf. In the refrigerator in the pantry located next to the dining room, there was an open gallon of milk that was not dated when it was opened, one open gallon of chocolate milk not dated when opened, four containers of ketchup not dated, a jar of homemade canned pickles not labeled with a resident's name or dated, a partially frozen half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide a fully functioning call system to provide direct communication from the resident to the caregivers for 4 of 21 residents sampled (15, 18, 25 and 26) Findings included: Observations on the third floor nursing unit on September 28, 2023, at approximately 2:00 PM revealed Resident 15's call bell was unplugged from the wall. The call bell was observed lying on the floor under the resident's bed. Observation revealed that Resident 18's call bell was unplugged from the wall. The call bell was not accessible to the resident and was found lying under the resident's bed. Resident 25's call bell was unplugged from the wall. The call bell was found under a chair in the room and not accessible to the resident. Resident 26's call bell was unplugged from the wall. The call bell could not be located in the resident's room. The call belly system was not functional for this resident's use. Interview with the nursing home administrator (NHA) on September 28, 2023, at approximately 4:00 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the resident's interested representative of a change in condition for one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, left hallux (big toe) amputation, partial first metatarsal ray resection of left foot (procedure used to help salvage the foot and maintain bipedal ambulation), and a right foot ulcer. A review of a nurses note dated September 11, 2023, noted resident with fluid filled blisters to bilateral shins approximately the size of a large grape and noting that the physician was aware. New orders were received and updated accordingly. The order was for Furosemide (a diuretic medication) to be given twice daily for three days. Antibiotic cream and dry sterile dressing to be put in place once sites open and begin draining. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the course of illness, corresponding treatment, discharge instructions, and a post-discharge care plan for one of one discharged resident record reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the closed clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, left hallux (big toe) amputation, partial first metatarsal ray resection of left foot (procedure used to help salvage the foot and maintain bipedal ambulation), and right foot ulcer. A closed clinical records review, conducted on September 28, 2023, revealed that Resident CR1 was discharged home with hospice services on September 15, 2023. A nurses note dated September 11, 2023, indicated that the resident had fluid filled blisters on both shins approximately the size of a large grape. The entry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interviews it was revealed that the facility failed to accurately monitor bowel activity to ensure a physician prescribed bowel protocol was timely implemented as needed for one resident out of 22 sampled residents (Resident 22). Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians {The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine} the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement, and the secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week). Review of facility policy entitled Bowel Regimen, last reviewed January 2023 indicated that the purpose of the bowel regimen was to achieve control of bowel evacuation on a regular basis, to avoid constipation, to prevent fecal impaction, and to establish psychological and social well-being.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide services planned to maintain mobility for two of four sampled residents for mobility/range of motion (Resident 7 and 19). Findings include: A review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include intervertebral disc displacement of the lumbar region (degeneration of the disc that separate the bones of the spine, causing pain in the back and legs), and gout (complex form of arthritis). Resident 7 was discharged from physical therapy on August 15, 2023 with discharge recommendations that Resident 7 was to receive Restorative Nursing Services (RNP) to walk daily, 30-50 feet with a rolling walker, with assist of one person and a wheelchair to follow. Review of facility document titled Documentation Survey Report v2 dated August 2023, revealed that the daily restorative program for ambulation was not provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services designed to prevent potential complications associated with tube feedings for one resident receiving an enteral feeding out of 21 residents sampled (Resident 17). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 17 revealed admission to the facility on October 13, 2022, with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 17 required a PEG tube [Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an endoscopic medical procedure in which a tube (PEG tube) is passed into the patient's stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate [for example, because of dysphagia] for enteral feeding [enteral nutrition generally refers to any method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to deliver part or all of a person's caloric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, orderly, and homelike environment in resident areas on two of three resident units (Units 2 and 3). Findings included: An observation on August 15, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a build-up of a white powdery substance covering the red electrical outlet, black electrical cord, and chair legs adjacent to the door-side bed. An observation on August 15, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a tan floor mat, to left of the bed located by the door, that had black scuff marks, brown stains, and areas of build-up of black substance Observation of the residents' bathroom revealed a toilet cleaning brush hanging on the assist bar behind the toilet. An observation on August 15, 2023, at 10:45 a.m., of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed brown and tans stains on the top and front cover of the heating and cooling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of grievances filed with the facility and the minutes from resident group meetings and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings, including those voiced by six (6) of the seven (6) residents (Residents 16, 20, 25, 52, 65, and 101). Findings included: A review of the minutes from the May 2023 through July 2023 Resident Council and Town Hall meetings revealed that residents in attendance at these meetings voiced their concerns regarding the facility's laundry services and long waits for staff to respond to their call bells. The minutes from several Resident Council meetings indicated that concerns with facility laundry services were referred to a laundry/housekeeping meeting (Town Hall). During the May 1, 2023, Resident Council Meeting, the residents voiced several concerns related to missing clothing articles. Individual grievances were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living consistently received showers as planned to maintain good personal hygiene for one of four residents sampled (Resident 126). Findings include: A review of Resident 126's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) of Resident 126 dated July 12, 2023, indicated that the resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing/showers. The resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 8 (brief interview for mental status, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and select facility incident reports, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of the 27 residents sampled (Residents 111). Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included unspecified cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated August 2, 2023, indicated that Resident 111 is severely cognitively impaired and exhibits inattention, disorganized thought, threatening, screaming, or yelling at others. A psychiatric evaluation and history dated June 1, 2023, indicated that Resident 111 during a psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post nurse staffing information on a daily basis to include the resident census and the total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed staff. Findings Include: Observations in the facility lobby on June 11, 2024, at 8:45 AM and 3:10 PM, and June 12, 2024, at 9:00 AM revealed that the facility's nurse staffing information was not posted in the facility's designated area. An interview with the Director of Nursing on June 12, 2024, at 9:10 AM revealed that the nurse staffing information should be posted daily at the beginning of each shift in a prominent location. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
- No harm found · B2024-06-14 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and transfer notices, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notices of facility-initiated transfers to the resident and the resident's representative for eight out of the 27 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 114, 101, 9, 63, 112, 2, and 106). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 114 was transferred to the hospital on March 11, 2024, and returned to the facility on March 15, 2024. A clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that a notice of transfer or discharge letter was provided to Resident 114 and her resident representative regarding her transfer to the hospital on March 11, 2024, or as soon as practical. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 was transferred to the hospital on June 8, 2024, and returned to the facility on June 10, 2024. A clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that a notice of transfer or discharge letter was provided to Resident 7 and her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-14 for 34 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMBER RIDGE SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/30/2021 |
| CH PA7 SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/30/2021 |
| CHRH EQUITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/20/2021 |
| ENS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/20/2021 |
| IH PA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/30/2021 |
| THE ENS FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/20/2021 |
| YMCS EQUITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/20/2021 |
| GOTTESMAN, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/20/2021 |
| SIMPSON, LOUANN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/30/2021 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/20/2021 |
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $801K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395148. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.