No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lancaster Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

900 East King Street, Lancaster, PA 17602 · For profit - Corporation · 446 certified beds · (717) 299-7850 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 299-7850 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited May 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
955 E. King St. · (717) 394-8908 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
955 E King St · (717) 588-1165 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
235 N Reservoir St · (800) 573-2763 · Call to confirm hours
Park
King St. · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.4%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.1%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.4%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine44.4%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.2%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.691.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.361.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 161 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 167 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.0%CMS range 29.3–44.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 6.0–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting83.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.3–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
56.0%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 446 beds and averages 390.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-29)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that foot care needs were provided timely for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 4).Based on review of policies and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that foot care needs were provided timely for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings Include:Review of facility policy Podiatry Service Policy states The facility shall provide access to Podiatry services for residents based on physician or authorized practitioner orders, resident needs and applicable federal and state regulations.Review of Resident 4 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated May 14 2026, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, dependent on staff for daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of diabetes (disease that interferes with blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of facility policy and procedure, observation and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate items were in place for a resident with a restraint for one of thirty-five residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:Review of facility policy and procedure titled Use of Restraints revealed Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body.Further review of the policy and procedure revealed The definition of a restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. I the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which the staff applied it given that resident's physical condition and this restricts his/her typical ability to change position or place, that device is considered a restraint.Further review of the policy and procedure revealed Restraints may only be used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the Comprehensive Care Plan for one out of thirty-five resident's reviewed. Review of clinical orders for Resident #11 finds an order placed on June 28, 2025, for a status of Full Code (medical directive where a resident requests all possible life-saving measures be utilized in the event of a cardiac arrest). Review of Resident #11's Comprehensive Care Plan reveals that the care plan was updated on May 28, 2026, to reflect the resident's change in code status to Full Code. Review of Resident #11's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that Resident #11's care plan was updated to Full Code Status on June 28, 2025, when Resident #11's physician initiated the Full Code Status order. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing Services

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered fluid restrictions were monitored daily as ordered for two of thirty-five residents reviewed (Resident 2 and Resident 19).Findings include: Review of Resident 2's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF – excessive body/lung fluid caused by a weakened heart muscle). Review of Resident 2's physician's orders revealed an order dated March 31, 2026, for 2000 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction every day – Dietary 1080 ml; nursing 920 ml (480 ml day shift, 360 ml evening shift and 80 ml night shift. Review of Resident 2's May 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed daily documentation of fluid consumption for nursing. Further review of Resident 2's clinical record failed to reveal any documented evidence of dietary fluid consumption and also failed to reveal any documented evidence of a total daily fluid consumption to ensure Resident 2 did not exceed the physician ordered 2000 ml daily fluid restriction. Interview with the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (feeding delivered through a feeding tube) as ordered by the physician for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident 1)Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record Face Sheet revealed the resident admitted into the facility from the hospital on September 16, 2025, with medical diagnoses that include Anoxic Brain Damage(brain is completely deprived of oxygen for four minutes or longer, causing widespread cell death and potential permanent damage). , Osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), Acute and Chronic respiratory Failure (long-term condition where the lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide ), Mild Protein Calorie Malnutrition and Tracheostomy Status (surgical procedure creating an opening (stoma) in the neck into the trachea, often with a tube inserted to bypass upper airway obstructions, facilitate long-term mechanical ventilation, or clear secretions). Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed an order dated January 19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review revealed the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment for 3 of 7 units. (4th, 5th, and 6th floors)Findings include:Observation on January 9, 2026 at 10:45 a.m. of the 6th floor west side shower room revealed 1 live roach in a supply cabinet, 5 dead roaches in the same supply cabinet, and 1 dead roach in the sink. 1 dying roach (approximately 3 inches in length) was observed in the 6th floor lobby in front of the elevators.Observation on January 9, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. of the 5th floor east side shower room revealed multiple dead roaches in the toilet and shower rooms and 1 live roach on the shower curtain.Observation on January 9, 2026 at 12:15 p.m. of the 4th floor west shower room revealed multiple dead roaches in the shower room and 1 live roach on the shower curtain.Interview with Resident 1 on January 9, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. revealed that he reported live roaches in his bed to the Maintenance department several weeks ago.A review of Service Inspection Reports from the exterminating company reveals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's wound care order for one of two residents reviewed (Resident CL1).Findings include:A review of Resident CL1's clinical records revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (Obscured full-thickness and tissue loss) to both heels.A review of the physician's order dated August 12, 2025, revealed a wound care order to cleanse bilateral heels with mild soap and water, rinse well and pat dry, apply Santyl (A topical medication used for removing damaged or burned skin to allow for wound healing and growth of a healthy skin) at nickel thickness to wounds careful to minimize the amount of Santyl on surrounding skin. Cover with Alginate (material used in wound to absorb fluid) then cover with abdominal dressing and wrap with Kling (gauze wrap) every day shift.A review of September 2025, Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed Resident CL1's wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide toenail care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents), dated August 2, 2025, revealed that the resident has severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS indicated that the resident required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. An observation conducted on October 10, 2025, at 11 a.m. in the presence of an unlicensed Employee E3 revealed that the resident's big toenails of the right and left foot were thick, long and curled inward. Additional observation revealed the right and left second, and third toenails were also long. An interview with Licensed Nursing Employee E3 on October 10, 2025, at 11:03 am was conducted and Licensed Nursing Employee E3 was unable to determine the last time foot care was provided to Resident 1. A review of Resident 1's clinical record failed to reveal toenail care was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect and facilitate the resident's right to receive unopened mail for two of two residents interviewed (Resident 16 and Resident 17).Findings include:Review of Resident 16 comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated February 8,2025, revealed a score of 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) which places the resident as cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident 16 on July 11,2025 at approximately 12:15 p.m., resident stated that they received mail that was opened against their wishes. Review of Resident 17 comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated June 28,2025, revealed a score of 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) which places the resident as cognitively intact.During an interview with Resident 17 on July 11, 2025, at 12:30pm, resident stated that they received mail that was opened. Resident 17 revealed open mail was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding showers for 1 of 5 resident's reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed the resident is scheduled for shower every Monday evening shift and PRN (as needed). Review of Resident 1's clinical records revealed a 30-day shower task form, dated from May 29, 2025, through June 16, 2025, documenting the resident received a shower on May 29, 2025, at 11:07 a.m., May 30, 2025, at 11:26 a.m., and June 3, 2025, at 8:55 p.m. Further review of the shower task form revealed documentation that the resident refused to shower on June 16, 2025, at 9:48 p.m. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E14 and Registered Nurse Unit Manager Employee E15 on June 26, 2025, at 12:18 p.m., E14 stated the resident has received a shower since June 16, 2025. E15 confirmed no shower was documented on the resident's shower task form or clinical records since June 3, 2025. Interview conducted with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure weights were monitored and a significant weight change was promptly addressed for five out of 15 residents reviewed (Residents 27, 74, 158, 202, and 338). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, last revised in March 2022, states Resident weights are monitored for undesireable or unintended weight loss or gain. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment must be retaken the next day for confirmation. A. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the dietitian. Review of Resident 27's physician's orders included an order to weigh monthly every day shift every four weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed a weight of 153.9 pounds on September 16, 2024, and a weight of 139.4 pounds on September 30, 2024, indicating a loss of 14.5 pounds (9.4%). Further review of the clinical record indicated that a weight was not obtained until October 9, 2024 (9 days after the identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility policy, review of the medication manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store and label medication on four of four medication carts reviewed (7th Floor South Side Cart, 7th Floor North Side Cart, 8th Floor North/South Cart and 8th Floor Southeast/Northeast Cart) Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, revision date of February 2023, revealed that medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. Medications may not be transferred between containers. Multi-dose vials opened and accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturers specify a shorter or longer time for the open vial. A review of manufacturers' storage guidelines for Lantus Insulin Pen (long-acting insulin) revealed that the medication may be stored at room temperature and must be discarded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained during meals for one of the 35 residents reviewed (Resident 51). Findings include: A review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated March 11, 2025, revealed that Resident 51 had a moderate cognitive impairment. The same MDS revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (A brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head). An observation conducted on April 9, 2025, at 9:16 a.m., revealed Resident 51 was sitting on a recliner in the hallway outside of his/her room. The resident was alert to themself with difficulty finishing words. When the resident was asked by the surveyor if they could talk inside his room, non-licensed Employee E5 who was passing another resident's breakfast meal tray suddenly interrupted and stated No, he's going to have breakfast. Instead of placing the meal tray and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records, and facility documentation, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the physician of an unwitnessed fall with a facial bruise for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 305). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, with a revision date of February 2021, revealed that the facility promptly notifies the resident, attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been an: Accident or incident involving the resident; and need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within 24 hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Clinical records review revealed Resident 305's diagnosis list includes Dementia (A term used to describe a group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on housekeeping routine schedule, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for one of 40 sampled residents (Resident R197). Findings include: The facility's ISH Health Services, Job Routine H4 states that housekeeping is scheduled to clean Resident R197's room between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. An interview with Resident R197 on April 8, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. revealed that housekeeping had not cleaned his room for several days. Observations of Resident R197's room revealed a dried, light brown substance under the resident's urinary drainage bag. Resident R197 reported that the substance had been there for over four days. Further observations on April 9, 2025, at 9:16 a.m. and 12:43 p.m. confirmed that housekeeping had not cleaned the room, as the dried light brown substance remained under the urinary drainage bag. Additional observations on April 10, 2025, at 9:59 a.m. showed the same dried light brown substance under the urinary drainage bag. A review of Resident R197's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS) were completed accurately for two of two residents reviewed (Resident 193 and Resident 244). Findings include: Review of Resident 193's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, diabetes mellitus (DM - failure of the body to produce insulin to enable sugar to pass from the blood stream to cells for nourishment), protein calorie malnutrition, gastrostomy (feeding tube) and tracheostomy (breathing tube). Review of Resident 193's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident needs) dated January 25, 2025, revealed Resident 193 had a significant weight loss. Review of Resident 193's Weight Summary failed to reveal evidence of a significant weight loss. Interview with Licensed Employee E11 on April 10, 2025, at 12:15 p.m. revealed that Resident 193's Quarterly MDS was completed in error regarding the significant weight loss and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of the 35 residents reviewed (Resident 23 and 111). Findings include: A review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated February 16, 2025, revealed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS revealed that the resident utilizes a wheelchair for mobilization. A review of the nursing progress notes dated March 19, 2025, at 4:00 p.m., revealed Resident 23 was found on the ground floor of the building with clothes stating she/he was leaving. An Alpha Watch (device that triggers alarms if they approach restricted areas or attempt to leave) was applied to the resident's wheelchair. A review of Resident 23's Elopement Evaluation dated March 19, 2025, revealed a Yes check mark for the following questions: Resident with a history of elopement or attempted leaving the facility without informing the staff; Resident verbally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident call bells were answered and addressed in an appropriate amount of time for one of one resident (Resident R197). Finds include: Review of Resident R197's clinical record revealed the following diagnoses: unspecified injury at an unspecified level of the cervical spinal cord (spinal cord injury), quadriplegia (a symptom of paralysis that affects all of a person's limbs and body from the neck down), and muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning of muscle tissue). Review of Resident R197's care plan revealed the following interventions: TRANSFER: Resident is dependent on the assistance of two staff members using a mechanical lift (Hoyer lift) for all transfers; non-ambulatory. This care plan had a start date of March 4, 2019. An interview conducted with Resident R197 on April 8, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. revealed that when he activates his call bell (a system used to notify staff that assistance is required), staff will enter his room, turn off the call bell, and then leave…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration and fluid restrictions for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 1, Resident 27 and Resident 371). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's diagnosis list includes Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-A weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs) and Acute Respiratory Failure. Review of Resident 1's physician order dated October 21, 2024, revealed an order for 2000 ml fluid restriction every 24 hours. 1020 ml- dietary, and 980 ml - nursing. Review of April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no documentation that the fluid restriction was followed. Review of Resident 27's care plan revealed resident had a diagnosis of hyponatremia (low blood sodium level) with a need for fluid restriction. Review of physician's orders included an order for 1000 milliliter (mL) fluid restriction (Nursing total=280 ml in 24 hours; Dining total=720 ml in 24 hours). Review of the March 2025 and April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ased on observations, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a wound treatment order for one of the four residents reviewed (Resident 111). Findings include: Clinical records review revealed Resident 111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss) to the sacrum (The triangular bone just below the lumbar vertebrae). admission skin assessment revealed that the sacral wound measured 12 x 9.0 x 1.0 cm. with 10% slough (A non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green, or brown tissue; usually moist, can be soft, stringy, and mucinous in texture. Slough may be adherent to the base of the wound or present in clumps throughout the wound bed). Further review revealed that the resident has Osteomyelitis (bone infection) and was receiving Intravenous (Medication administered through a vein) Antibiotics (medication used to fight infections). A review of resident 111's physician's order dated March 12, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of consultant pharmacist's Medication Review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a pain scale as recommended by the pharmacist and agreed to by the nurse practitioner for the use of a narcotic and failed to provide Non-pharmaceutical Interventions prior to the administration of narcotic pain medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 371). Findings include: Review of Resident 371's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including encephalopathy (swelling in brain), osteoarthritis of the left shoulder, and chronic tension headaches. Review of Resident 371's physician's orders dated January 22, 2025, revealed an order for Hydromorphone (narcotic pain medication) HCl 2 milligrams (mg) give one half tablet (1 mg) by mouth every 2 hours as needed (PRN) for pain. Review of Resident 371's consultant pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated February 27, 2025, revealed the need to add a pain scale for the administration of Hydromorphone. Review of Resident 371's March 2025 and April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) failed to reveal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention and management was practiced during medication administration and meal set up for two 35 residents reviewed (Resident 1 and 51). Findings include: An observation of the medication administration was conducted with licensed Employee E6 on April 8, 2025, at 9:55 a.m. The observation revealed that after preparing Resident 1's medication, Employee E6 approached Resident 1 who was lying in bed to give the medication. While the resident was trying to pick up the medications in the cup, one of the pills fell on the resident's tray table. Further observations revealed Employee E6 picked up the pill that fell with bare hands without performing hand hygiene and then gave it to the resident to swallow. An observation conducted on April 9, 2025, at 9:16 a.m., revealed Resident 51 was sitting on a recliner in the hallway outside of his/her room holding a puzzle book. While talking to the resident, non-licensed Employee E5 who was observed passing another resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnosis: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood due to a failure in oxygen exchange in the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung condition caused by damage to the airways that limit airflow in and out of the lungs), anxiety disorder (characterized by excessive, persistent and uncontrollable worry and fear about everyday situations), muscle wasting and atrophy (deterioration of ones muscles), and difficulty in walking. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a progress note dated September 26, 2024, at 10:25 a.m. stating call placed to [power of attorney for care] who stated she requested 2 siderails [power of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that [NAME] Nursing and Rehabilitation Center failed to ensure a resident was monitored for weight loss and follow physician orders for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed diagnoses including but not limited to following: unspecified injury of head, Obesity, Depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in activities of daily living), Chronic pain, and Congenital Malformation of Corpus Callosum (brain defect where there is a complete or partial absence of the corpus callosum, a bundle of nerves connecting the right and left side of the brain). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident had a recorded weight of 275.7 pounds on May 1, 2024. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a weight of 180 pounds on June 6, 2024. Additional review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for three of 40 residents reviewed. (Residents 67, 222, and Resident 223) Findings include: Review of Resident 67's physician's orders included an order dated July 5, 2022, for a 24-hour fluid restriction of 1800 milliliters (ml) with 660 mL from nursing and 1140 mL from dining. Review of Resident 67's clinical record including April 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident exceeded the amount of fluids provided by nursing on 29 of 30 occasions. Review of Resident 67's clinical record including May 2024 MAR revealed that the resident exceeded the amount of fluids provided by nursing on 12 of 20 occasions. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documentation of the amount of fluids consumed with meals for May 2024. The above information was presented to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on May 21, 2024, at 1:45 p.m. Review of Resident 222's physician order dated April 6, 2024, revealed an order for a Milk of Magnesia Suspension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (delivery of nutrition by a feeding tube) in accordance with physician's order for four of 11 residents receiving enteral feeding (Residents 72, 244, 259, and 364). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Nutrition, revised in November 2018, revealed facility will provide adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition to the residents as ordered. Review of Resident 72's physician's order of October 18. 2023 included an order for enteral feeding Jevity 1.5 via peg tube continuous at a rate of 55 milliliter(mL)/hour for a total volume of 1210 mL/24 hours. Review of Resident 72's April 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the resident exceeded 1210 mL/24 hours for six of 30 days. Documentation on four of 90 shifts revealed staff were documenting the rate of 55 mL/hour instead of the volume received. Review of the May 2024 MAR revealed that the resident exceeded 1210 mL/24 hours for three of 20 days and two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control prevention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) were in place for residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions for nine of nine residents reviewed (Residents 59, 67, 72, 106, 130, 152, 220, 343, and 364). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated April 2024, revealed EBP employees targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities in which there is an opportunity for transfer of MDRO (Multiple Drug Resistant Organisms) to staff hands and clothing. EBP is indicated for residents with the following: Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO infections or colonization status; Indwelling medical devices: urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomies, and ventilators. Appropriate notification/signage is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 165, 250, and 396). Findings include: Review of Resident 165's progress note of November 1, 2023, revealed resident was found on the floor and reported severe pain to the lower back and right hip area. The physician was notified and ordered the resident be sent to the hospital. Review of additional progress note of November 1, 2023, revealed that a CT scan (computed tomography scan - type of x-ray that creates cross-sectional images) showed a comminuted impacted right acetabular (hip) fracture with right iliac (hip) muscle hematoma (bruise) and right inferior pubic ramus (part of the pelvis) fracture. Review of Resident 165's significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) of November 10, 2023, section J1700A indicated that the resident did not have a fall any time in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 73). Findings include: Review of Resident 73's physician's orders included an order dated September 22, 2023, for Eliquis (anticoagulation - medication used to prevent blood clots) 2.5 milligrams one tablet twice a day for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (type of irregular heartbeat). Review of quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) of March 20, 2024, revealed that resident was receiving an anticoagulant. Review of Resident 73's current care plan revealed no care plan or interventions for anticoagulant medication. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 21, 2024, at 1:30 confirmed that Resident 73 did not have a care plan to address the anticoagulant. 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan Previously cited 7/27/23 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records Previously cited 7/27/23 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 7/27/23

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and monitor weights for two of 35 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 259 and 348). Findings include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention revised September 2008 indicated that any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. The dietitian will notify nursing witin 48-72 hours after weight is reviewed for needed re-weights. Review of Resident 259's clinical records revealed Resident 259 had a diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS- nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function). The resident had a Tracheostomy (An opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea to allow air to fill the lungs) and a Gastrostomy Tube (GT- medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth). Review of the weight and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to administer as needed pain medications for appropriate pain levels for one of ten residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 97). Findings include: Review of Resident 97's physician's orders revealed an order dated January 30, 2024, for Oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) 5 milligrams (mg) every 8 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of Resident 97's May 2024 Medication Administration Report (MAR) revealed the resident received Oxycodone on May 8, 2024, and May 10, 2024, for pain rated 1 on a scale of 1-10. Review of resident 97's April 2024 MAR revealed the resident received Oxycodone 5mg on April 3, 2024, and April 4, 2024, for pain rated 0, April 19, 2024, for pain rated 1, and April 21, 2024, for pain rate 3 on a scale of 1-10. Review of resident 97's March 2024 MAR revealed the resident received Oxycodone 5mg on March 1, 2024, March 2, 2024, and March 3, 2024, for pain rated 1 on a scale of 1-10. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on May 22, 2024, at 12:43 pm., confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of three residents reviewed for dialysis was free of significant medication errors (Resident 220). Findings include: Interview with Resident 220 on May 20, 2024, at approximately 1:10 p.m. revealed the resident received insulin (medication given to lower blood sugar) but was not receiving it correctly. Further interview with Resident 220 at this time revealed the resident did not receive certain medications on the days the resident attended dialysis. Review of Resident 220's physician's orders revealed an order dated May 2, 2024, for insulin lispro (fast acting insulin), inject per sliding scale: If blood sugar is 0-199 - give 0 units of insulin If blood sugar is 200-250 - give 4 units of insulin If blood sugar is 251-300 - give 6 units of insulin If blood sugar is 301-350 - give 8 units of insulin If blood sugar is 351-400 - give 10 units of insulin; and if blood sugar is greater than 400, give 10 units of insulin and call the physician. The order further read to hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assistive devices for eating were made available for one of the 18 residents reviewed (Resident 189). Findings include: Review of resident 189's diagnosis list includes Diabetes with Mononeuropathy (nerve damage caused by high blood sugar levels), legal blindness, and Brachial plexus disorder (An injury in the network of nerve fibers that innervates the skin and musculature of the upper extremity. It causes a burning sensation, numbness or weakness of the arm, severe pain, and inability to move or feel the affected arm). Review of Resident 189's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated May 3, 2024, revealed Resident 189 was cognitively intact. The same MDS revealed resident had one side impairment of the upper extremity. Interview was conducted with Resident 189 on May 21, 2024, at 12:10 p.m. The resident reported that due to limitations on his/her hands/fingers, he was provided with a special…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medication manufacturer's guidelines, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored on one of the medication carts observed (8th SW Floor Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Insulin Lispro (Humalog-fast-acting insulin), revealed that the medication must be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of manufacturer's storage guidelines for Insulin Gargline (long-acting insulin) revealed that the medication may be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Insulin Aspart (Novolog-fast-acting insulin), revealed that the medication must be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Novolog Insulin (fast-acting insulin), revealed that the medication must be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined that [NAME] Nursing and Rehabilitation Center failed to ensure a clean, sanitary environment in the kitchen and/or food storage area. Findings include: Observation conducted on November 1, 2023 at approximately 9:10 a.m. in the company of the assistant food/beverage director, Employee E3, of the dry storage room revealed one wall, approximately one yard in length, was noted to have splattered areas of black-like substance on it. The floor was visibly soiled in areas with food particles. Further observation revealed open packets of crackers on a shelving unit. Interview with Employee E3 on November 1, 2023 at approximately 9:12 a.m. confirmed the dry storage area was not sanitary/clean area. Employee E3 indicated the areas should be clean and free of any food debris or substances. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa Code 211.6(d) Dietary Services

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CONESTOGA VIEW SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/30/2021
CH PA7 SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/30/2021
CHRH EQUITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/20/2021
ENS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/20/2021
IH PA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/30/2021
THE ENS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/20/2021
YMCS EQUITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/20/2021
GOTTESMAN, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/20/2021
EVANS, ANGELAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/30/2021
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2021

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$43.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 2%Other / private 9%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$321per resident / day
operating cost
$9,744per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$309per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395774. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next