Sena Kean Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 105.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation, and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two of three residents reviewed were free of neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of left femur fracture for one resident (Resident R1) and actual harm of a laceration of the right eyebrow and forehead for one resident (Resident R2).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Abuse Investigation and Reporting dated 1/22/25, revealed The Administrator or designee will monitor that any further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment is prevented while the investigation is in progress. Facility policy entitled Abuse Prevention Program dated 1/22/25, revealed Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of residents properly and exploitation. Facility policy entitled Safe Resident Handling and Movement Policies' dated 1/22/25, revealed Subject to Care Plan team determinations regarding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation and clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately transfer a resident in accordance to facility policy which resulted in actual harm of a left hip and femur (upper leg) fracture for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance.Findings include: Facility policy entitled Safe Resident Handling and Movement Policies, dated 1/22/25, revealed, staff is expected to follow the individual resident's plan of care as written. Residents identified using the Minimum Data Set Assessment as Totally Dependent or requiring Extensive Assistance for Transfer and/or Mobility will be handled by means of mechanical lift equipment and/or other resident assist devices; A total dependent transfer requiring a mechanical lift will require two staff for bed mobility; transfer assistance, mobility assistance and other resident handling and movement tasks are to be carried out in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, Resident Council minutes, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were updated in a timely manner regarding Resident Council concerns, and the facility failed to correct Resident Council concerns for a period of four months (January 2026, through April 2026). Findings include: A facility policy Resident Council dated 1/12/26, revealed the facility supports residents' rights to organize and participate in the resident council. The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for a) residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; b) discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; c) consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and d) disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents. A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately maintain supplemental oxygen equipment for four of 23 residents reviewed for respiratory services (Residents R54, R38, R92, and R60).Findings include: A facility policy entitled Oxygen dated 1/12/26, indicated that any tubing not in use will be placed in a bag to ensure tubing remains clean and dry.Observations on 4/19/26, revealed:-At 3:20 p.m. Resident R38's oxygen tubing hanging on the portable oxygen tank attached to the back of his/her wheelchair and the tubing not in a bag, and the tubing for his/her respiratory nebulizer machine lying on the floor.-At 3:25 p.m. Resident R54's oxygen tubing lying next to his/her bed on the floor and not in a bag. -At 3:33 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3 picked Resident R38's respiratory nebulizer tubing up from the floor then attached the tubing to Resident R38's nebulizer mask and was going to administer an as needed medicated nebulizer treatment. During an interview at that time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and resident observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for seven of 23 residents (Residents R15, R23, R28, R38, R54, R82, and R83).Findings include:A facility policy entitled Cleaning of Wheelchairs and Geri-chairs dated 1/12/26, indicated that wheelchairs are cleaned according to the resident's shower schedule on the 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. shift prior to the shower day.Observations on 4/19/26, between 2:00 p.m. and 4:30 p.m. and 4/20/26, between 9:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed that Residents R15, R23, R28, R38, R54, R82, and R83's wheelchairs with copious amounts of dried food particles, dried liquids, accumulation of dust and dirt, and debris on frames, wheels, arm rests, seats, seat cushions, and leg rests.During an interview on 4/21/26, at 10:41 a.m. Registered Nurse RN Employee E6 confirmed the condition of the above wheelchairs were as stated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain privacy of confidential information during medication administration for two of five medication carts (West A Cart and East A Cart).Findings include:A facility policy entitled Computer Terminals/Workstations dated 1/12/26, indicated in so far as practical/feasible, computer terminals/workstations will be positioned or shielded so that screen are not visible to the public or to unauthorized staff; only authorized users are granted access to resident and facility information; and a user may not leave his/her workstations or terminal unattended unless the terminal screen is cleared and the user if logged off.Observation on 4/19/26, at 3:55 p.m. revealed the [NAME] A medication cart was parked in [NAME] A hallway and was unattended with the computer screen containing resident information visible to anyone passing by in the corridor. During an interview at the time of the observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 acknowledged the lack of privacy with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications on two of five medication carts (East A Cart and [NAME] B Cart).Findings include:A facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 1/12/26, indicated that compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others.Observation on 4/19/26, at 3:51 p.m. revealed the [NAME] B Medication Cart was parked in the [NAME] B hallway unlocked and unattended. During an interview at 3:55 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 confirmed that the medication cart should have been locked.Observation on 4/20/26, at 8:35 a.m. revealed the East A Medication Cart was parked in the East A hallway unlocked and unattended.During an interview at that time, LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and documents, and clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification to the resident, family and/or the resident's representative, prior to a facility-initiated room change, including the reason for the change for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R53). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Bed Hold Notification dated 1/22/25, indicated that if the resident is covered by Medicaid and admitted to the hospital, the bed will be held automatically for 15 days by the Medicaid Provider regulations. A facility policy entitled Bed Holds and Returns dated 1/22/25, indicated that residents who seek to return to the facility within the bed hold period defined in the state plan are allowed to return to their previous room, if available. A facility policy entitled Room Assignment/Change Policy dated 1/22/25, indicated: when a room change is necessary, the resident and family will be consulted and reasons for the move will be explained by the Social Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders and resident's Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R97). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Advance Directives dated [DATE], revealed The plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive .the interdisciplinary team will be informed of changes and/or revocations so that appropriate changes can be made in the resident medical record and care plan. Resident R97's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily living and functioning), hypertension (high blood pressure), and heart disease. Resident R97's physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review facility policy and clinical records, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate suprapubic urinary catheter (tubing inserted directly into the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen and above the pubic bone to drain urine into a bag) care for one of three residents reviewed for catheters (Resident R51). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 1/22/25, revealed Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of Resident R51's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/23/24, with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a communication breakdown in the body that controls bladder function), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R51's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 12/26/24, for a suprapubic catheter related to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Observations on 4/29/25, at approximately 9:25 a.m. revealed that the bottom of Resident R51's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders and failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R21 and R59). Findings include: No facility policy was provided regarding management of oxygen therapy. Resident R21's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/27/22, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen throughout the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) , diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (a breathing disorder that could affect a person who is overweight). Resident R21's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 1/23/25, for O2 [oxygen]: therapy at 8 lpm (liters per minute) via nasal cannula [device…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in two of two unit refrigerators reviewed (West Unit and East Unit). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Pantries and Pantry Refrigerators and Freezers dated 1/22/25, revealed, The facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation Observation on 4/30/25, at approximately 9:27 a.m. of the [NAME] Unit freezer revealed several ice packs that are used for treatments on resident's bodies stored next to popsicles, candy bars, and several other food items. During an interview at the time of observation of the [NAME] Unit freezer with Social Services employee, he/she confirmed that ice packs that are used on resident's bodies should not be stored in the resident freezer with food. Observation on 4/30/25, at approximately 9:31 a.m. of the East Unit freezer revealed several ice packs that are used for treatments on resident's bodies stored next to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IMPERIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $643K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA