Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 114.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.83 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-02-21 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for involuntary seclusion.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not secluded when Resident #1 was placed in a vacant bathroom that was 60 degree Fahrenheit for approximately 5 hours. CNA A and LVN B knew Resident #1 was in the bathroom when the Surveyor found Resident #1 alone and cold. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 02/21/2026. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:20 AM. While the IJ was removed on 02/21/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated due to staff needing more time to monitor the plan of removal for effectiveness.This failure could place residents at risk of injury and isolation, leading to a decreased quality of life, severe emotional distress and trauma leading to distrust of staff.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to provide antibiotic medication to Resident #1 from 05/17/24 through 05/21/24. On 05/21/24, the facility sent Resident #1 to the ER by EMS. On 05/22/24, Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital for higher level of care. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 05/21/24 and ended 05/24/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications, hospitalization, infection or death. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 05/17/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation.1. The facility failed to ensure foods in the reach in refrigerator located in the kitchen were labeled and dated to include the use by date or prepared/pulled date.2. The facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner as to prevent contamination (sealed) in the walk-in refrigerator.3. The facility failed to ensure foods in the walk-in refrigerator were labeled and dated to include the use by date or prepared/pulled date.Findings included:During a tour of the kitchen on 06/20/2026 at 09:48 AM revealed the following:In the reach-in refrigerator in the kitchen revealed a salad in a Styrofoam container with two small, sealed cups of a white thick liquid substance sitting on top of it. Two plates with salads on them wrapped in plastic wrap. There was no labeling to include what the food was, the prepared date, or a use by date on the items listed.In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's door and privacy curtain were closed during personal care to provide respect and dignity. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, embarrassed, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 06/19/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: unspecified dementia (a disease that causes a general decline in cognitive abilities that can affect the ability to perform everyday activities, memory loss, and poor judgement), heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as well as it should making it harder to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1 to address his discharge. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet individualized, behavioral, medical and nursing needs. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/27/2026, revealed an eighty-two-year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included hemiplegia (severe or complete paralysis of one entire side of the body), nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere, cortical (bleeding within the cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accidents and hazards as is possible for one resident (Resident #2) of six reviewed for mechanical lift transfers.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents as CNA B failed to transfer Resident #2 with a mechanical lift (assistive device) with another staff to assist as required. This failure puts residents at risk for harm, injury and decreased quality of life.Findings included:Review of Resident #2 face sheet dated 05/19/2026 revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of previous history of a stroke, dementia (decline in mental ability affecting memory, thinking and communication), heart failure (serious chronic condition where the heart cannot pump enough oxygen rich blood to meet the body's demands), high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen.The facility failed to properly store, label, and date all food items located in the facility's walk-in refrigerator, freezer and in the dry food pantry area on 02/17/2026, 02/18/2026 and 02/19/2026 . The facility failed to properly seal food product bags in the walk-in refrigerator to prevent exposure to air on 02/17/2026. The facility failed to properly seal food product containers in the dry food area on 02/18/2026.The facility failed to discard outdated food items located in the dry food pantry area on 02/18/2026 and 02/19/2026 . These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 02/17/2026 beginning at 9:00 AM revealed the following:Refrigerator:1 storage bag that appeared to be leftover ham, no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had the right to self-determination and the right to make choices about aspects of life in the facility that were significant to the residents for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #39, Resident #40, and Resident #104) whose care was reviewed.The facility failed to honor Resident #39 and Resident #40's request to eat at an earlier time because they preferred to dine in their room.The facility failed to provide Resident #104 who prefers to dine in her room, with a method of choosing her meal selections from the available daily menu.The facility failed to provide 6 confidential residents menus for their rooms per their request.This failure could place residents at risk of diminished feelings of self-worth and/or diminished quality of life. Record review of Resident #39's MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2025, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE] with a BIMS score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' confidential resident group meeting during the survey for seven of seven residents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meeting. This failure could place residents, who attended confidential resident group meeting, at risk of not being able to exercise their rights of being able to voice their grievances in private without uninvited staff being present.Findings included:During an observation on 02/18/2026 at 10:15 am the Regional Dietary Consultant opened the door from the kitchen and leading into the dining room during the residents' confidential group meeting with the surveyor. She walked 2 or 3 steps into the dining room while the residents were voicing concerns about dietary. The residents would not voice any of their concerns after the Regional Dietary Consultant entered the dining room. During an interview on 02/18/2026 at 10:20 a.m., all the residents in the residents' confidential resident group meeting stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure storage of drugs and biologicals used in the facility for 2 of 8 medication carts and 1 of 2 medications rooms observed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication carts and rooms. The facility failed to ensure loose medications were removed from the medication carts. This failure could place residents who received medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medication. This failure could place residents who received medications at risk of receiving the wrong dose of medication.Findings included: During an observation on 02/18/2026 at 11:43 a.m., the 100 hall medication cart revealed two bottles of Losartan 50 mg with the expiration date of 01/03/2026 and one white, round medication tablet which was loose in the cart. During an observation on 02/18/2026 at 12:29 p.m., the 100/200 hall medication room revealed one bottle of B-50 Vitamin Supplement with the expiration date of 11/2025 and one loose pink, round…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make sure that its menus documented any substitutions made to the menus on 4 of 4 halls reviewed for food and nutrition services.The facility failed to place the correct weekly menu in the dining hall on 2/18/2026 for lunch and dinner meals. This failure could place residents who eat food from the kitchen at risk of not knowing what was on the menu so they could request an alternate meal timely. Observation on 02/17/26 at 1:07 PM revealed the menu board for halls 300/400 did not display the breakfast, lunch, or dinner menu.Observation on 02/17/26 at 1:15 PM revealed the menu board for halls 100/200 did not display the breakfast, lunch, or dinner menu.Observation on 02/18/26 at 8:00 AM revealed the menu board for halls 100/200 did not display the breakfast, lunch, or dinner menu.Observation on 02/18/26 at 11:11 AM revealed incorrect facility's weekly menu on the wall in the dining room, as it displayed week 5.Observation/Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide each resident at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care for 7 (Resident #11, Resident #30, Resident #39, Resident #40, Resident #79, Resident #82, and Resident # 104) of 7 residents reviewed for timely meals on hall 200. The facility failed to provide lunch according to the lunch meal service schedule on 02/17/26 to Residents #39, #40, and #82.The facility failed to provide breakfast according to the breakfast meal service schedule on 02/18/26 to Residents #30 #39, #40, #79 and #82.The facility failed to provide lunch according to the lunch meal service schedule on 02/18/26 to Residents #30 #39, # 40, #79, #82 and #104.The facility failed to provide dinner according to the dinner meal service schedule on 02/18/26 to Residents #11 #30, #39, # 40, #79, #82, and #104.The facility failed to provide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,353 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $21,332 — penalty dated 2026-02-19
• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-06-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 33 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX