No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Longview Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

3201 N Fourth St, Longview, TX 75605 · Government - Hospital district · 198 certified beds · (903) 236-4291 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$225,427 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $225,427 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-16)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3209 4th St · (903) 757-4662 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
470 E Loop 281 · (903) 234-0080 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
515 E Loop 281 · (903) 738-0619 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N. US 259 · (903) 758-3816 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
405 Hollybrook Dr · (903) 753-1657

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.9%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit26.8%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.342.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.132.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.2%CMS range 29.9–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.5–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.4–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
49.5%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 198 beds and averages 114.0 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-18)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #1 was administered his regular evening medication as ordered along with Resident #2's evening medication on the evening of 5/5/2025. Resident #1's medication included Gabapentin 200 mg at bedtime ( a medication used to treat peripheral neuropathy, chronic pain) Hemp gummies 20,000 2 gummies at bedtime ( a supplement used to treat anxiety, depression, pain, inflammation and improve sleep), Melatonin 9 mg at bedtime (a supplement to assist in sleep), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg at bedtime ( a medication used to treat an enlarged prostate), Docusate Sodium 100 mg twice daily (a stool softener), Eliquis 5 mg every 12 hours (a blood thinner), Furosemide 40 mg twice daily ( a medication used to treat fluid), Metoprolol 50 mg twice daily and acetaminophen-codeine 300-60 mg three times daily. 2. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to consult with the physician when there was a significant change in residents' physical status that was life threatening for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed notify Resident #1's physician on 2/5/25 when his PICC continued to be dislodged and he was unable to receive his IV antibiotics. Resident #1 did not receive his IV antibiotic medication from 2/6/25 through 2/7/25 (a total of 6 doses). The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician of his x-ray results that were ordered on 2/7/25 with results that indicated they were sent back to the facility on 2/7/25. Res #1's MD was notified on 2/10/25 that Res #1's x-ray indicated he had pneumonia, and he was transferred to the hospital. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of right lobe pneumonia due to ESBL(extended spectrum beta lactamase). The facility failed to notify Res #2's physician that his surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice based on the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received IV antibiotics when his PICC line was dislodged on 2/5/25. Resident #1 did not receive his IV antibiotic medication from 2/6/25 through 2/7/25 (a total of 6 doses). The facility failed to address Resident #1's chest x-ray that was ordered and sent back to the facility on 2/7/25 until 2/10/25. The facility notified Resident #1's MD on 02/10/25 that Resident #1's x-ray indicated he had pneumonia, and he was transferred to the hospital. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of right lobe pneumonia due to ESBL(extended spectrum beta lactamase). The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's surgical wound did not worsen. Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with left lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure ADON D and LVN E performed a skin assessment on Resident #1, after her family member reported concerns regarding worsening of moisture associated skin damage (inflammation and erosion of the skin, results from prolonged exposure to different sources of moisture such as feces, urine, sweat and other bodily fluids) to her buttocks on 02/23/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A applied Resident #1's nystatin (cream used to treat fungal infections), hydrocortisone (Medication applied to the skin used to treat skin conditions such as insect bites, poison oak/ivy, eczema, dermatitis, allergies, rash, itching of the outer female genitals, anal itching. This medication reduces the swelling, itching, and redness that can occur in these types of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail delivered to the facility for 3 of 3 confidential residents reviewed for right to communication.The facility failed to ensure residents received their mail unopened and on Saturdays.This failure could place residents at risk of potentially being denied their rights and receiving and opening mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life.Findings included:During a confidential group interview on undisclosed date and time, 3 of 3 residents interviewed said their supplies and mail would come to them open. A resident said every piece of mail he had received was open. Another resident reported he had received his bank card through the mail, and the staff had removed the bank card and brought it to him. He was concerned with someone getting his personal information from the card. The residents interviewed stated they did not receive mail on Saturdays.During an interview on 3/18/2026 at 8:55 AM, Receptionist H said she received mail and packages through multiple carriers. She said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 3 of 12 residents with limited range of motion (Resident #64, Resident #103 and Resident #53).1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53 had hand roll on right hand and palm guard splint on left hand for up to 8 hours during the day on 03/16/26, 03/17/26 and 3/18/26.2. Resident #64 had limited range of motion to upper right extremity with no services to prevent further decrease in range of motion.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #103 had a contracture prevention device in place for the treatment of his left-hand contracture on 03/16/26 and 03/17/26.These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met, decreased range of motion and a decline in their quality of care and life.1. Record review of Resident #53's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for PASRR services. The facility did not ensure Resident #49's significant change MDS assessment was accurately coded to reflect his level II PASRR status for intellectual and developmental disabilities. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 03/18/26, reflected Resident #49 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosesis of Down syndrome (a genetic condition caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome 21, leading to developmental delays and distinct physical features), severe intellectual disabilities (developmental condition characterized by significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior, requiring daily support for basic self-care and communication), and neurofibromatosis (group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #20 and Resident #111) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 had a comprehensive care plan for limited range of motion to her lower extremity.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 111 had a comprehensive care plan for limited range of motion to her lower extremity. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met, falls, decreased range of motion and a decline in their quality of care and life.Findings included: 1.Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities based on the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident #108)The facility failed to provide Resident #108 with consistent, scheduled, one-on-one activities.This failure could place residents at risk of not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 3/17/2026 indicated Resident #108 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age, due to degeneration of the brain), chronic atrial fibrillation (a type of heart arrhythmia characterized by an irregular and often rapid heartbeat), protein-calorie malnutrition (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #14) reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 and Resident 14's pressure- redistribution mattress (is designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) was on the correct settings. This failure could place residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers and could contribute to developing avoidable pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 3/17/26, indicated a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a serious medical emergency where a blood clot blocks blood vessels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #108) reviewed for fluid intake.The facility failed to ensure Resident #108's water pitcher was in reach on 3/16/2026 and 3/17/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of dehydration.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 3/17/2026 indicated Resident #108 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age, due to degeneration of the brain), chronic atrial fibrillation (a type of heart arrhythmia characterized by an irregular and often rapid heartbeat), protein-calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs and nutrients it gets) and diverticulosis of intestine (a condition characterized by the formation of small pouches in the colon and depression (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assured the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of 1 of 1 residents (Resident #95.)The facility medication aide failed to ensure that Resident #95 took his medication before leaving the room. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dosage and drug diversion. Findings included:Record review of the face sheet dated 11/14/23 indicated Resident #95 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Paraplegia (impairment or loss of motor and sensory function in the lower extremities and sometimes the torso, generally caused by spinal cord injury or disease below the neck), Cognitive Communication Deficit (a communication impairment resulting from underlying cognitive issues rather than primary language deficits, often caused by brain injuries, strokes, or dementia), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 12 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #11). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator and dry storage foods for Resident #11 was inspected for expired food and expired food disposed of. This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/23/2025 indicated Resident #11 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Urinary Tract Infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system—most commonly the bladder and urethra—often caused by bacteria, resulting in pain, burning, and a persistent urge to urinate), Major Depressive Disorder ( a serious, common mood disorder characterized by at least two weeks of persistent, low mood, sadness, and loss of interest in activities), Chronic Obtrusive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all essential equipment in a safe operating condition, for 1 of 4 refrigerators in a medication room reviewed for food service in that: The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator in medication room on hall 4 was cleaned, defrosted and food stored at an appropriate temperature on 3/17/26. This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings include: Record review of the refrigerator temperature log sheet indicated the refrigerator should be 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below.During an observation on 3/17/26 at 5: 22 P.M., the med room on hall 4 with RN Q. The refrigerator in the medication room was used to store food for residents that did not have refrigerators in their rooms was covered in the inside with a brown substance splatter throughout. The refrigerator had a large buildup of ice on the cooling element, and the thermometer reading was on the red level at 42 degrees Fahrenheit. The refrigerator contained sour cream packets, yogurt, cranberry juice, strawberry shake,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (ulcers). (Resident #1, Resident #2)1. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments for Resident #1 since 01/27/26. 2. The facility failed to complete quarterly Braden Scale Assessments on Resident #1 and Resident #2. There were no quarterly Braden Scale Assessments for Resident #1 since 06/04/25 and for Resident #2 since 02/08/24.These failures could place residents at risk for developing avoidable pressure injuries and the worsening of existing pressure injuries.1. Record review of a face sheet dated 02/28/26 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, muscle weakness, and diabetes. The face sheet indicated Resident #1 had been discharged to an acute care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or the resident's representative had the right to access all records pertaining to the resident, including current clinical records, within 24 hours (excluding weekends and holidays) upon oral or written request, and to obtain copies of such records within two working days upon request for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not provide Resident #1's MPOA access to Resident #1's urinalysis (UA) lab results in December 2025 when she verbally requested access. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed medical decision-making, lack of informed consent, and potential harm due to the representative's inability to timely review laboratory results and participate in care planning.Findings included: Record review of an admission record dated 02/07/26 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse reported to the Administrator regarding Resident #1 on 08/25/25. The Administrator did not interview Resident #1, her representative, or the caregiver that verbalized the allegation of abuse. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and injuries of unknown source.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 08/25/25. Her diagnoses included dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability that affects memory, thinking, and social skills to the point of interfering with daily life). Record review of the facility's Provider Investigation Report, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of residents for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident#6, and Resident #7.) Resident #3 had insulin that was past the 28-day labeled precautionary instructions. LVN E was going to administer the mediations. After she noted the insulin was past the 28- days, she had difficulty finding the correct medications. Residents # 4 # 5, and #7 had insulin in the medication cart that was past the 28-day labeled precautionary instructions. Resident #6's insulin had a space on the box for an opened date but there was not a date listed. These failures could place residents to receive medications that were not effective to control diabetic symptoms. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 2/13/25 indicated he was a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items were sealed and dated. 2. Hair restraints were worn appropriately by dietary staff. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: During an initial tour observation in the kitchen on 01/13/2025 at 9:30 a.m. there were 2 undated containers of instant mashed potatoes in the dry storage, 1 unsealed box of biscuit in the freezer. During an observation in the kitchen on 01/13/2025 at 9:40 a.m., [NAME] W was not wearing a hair restraint appropriately while preparing the lunch meal. [NAME] W's hair was visible outside of the hairnet in the back approximately four inches. During an observation in the kitchen on 01/14/2025 at 11:15 a.m., [NAME] W was not wearing a hair restraint appropriately while preparing the lunch meal. [NAME] W's hair was visible outside of the hairnet in the back approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 34 residents (Resident #17, Resident #21, Resident #79, and Resident #110) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #17's verbal and other behavioral symptoms, the diagnosis of COPD (is a chronic lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) and use of an antiplatelet medication (work to make your platelets less sticky and thereby help prevent blood clots from forming in your arteries). 2. The facility failed to care plan Resident #110's use of an antiplatelet medication, risk for pressure ulcers (is a localized area of skin damage caused by prolonged pressure on the skin), and the diagnosis of dehydration (occurs when your body loses more water and fluids than it takes in). 3. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented for Resident #21's use of dentures. 4. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (a medication used in excessive doses and including duplicate therapy or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring, or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #66, Resident #71, and Resident #78) The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 did not receive an antibiotic, Cephalexin 250mg BID for an UTI, without appropriate lab work. The facility failed to ensure Resident #71's antibiotic, Macrobid 100mg BID, was discontinued after her urine culture (checks urine for germs (microorganisms) that cause infections) results showed no organism growth. The facility failed to ensure Resident #78 did not receive antibiotics, Rocephin (Ceftriaxone) 2gm IM 1 time dose and Levaquin (Levofloxacin) 750mg one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents' drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (without adequate behavior monitoring and diagnosis) for 3 (Resident # 17, Resident #23, and Resident #110) of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's behaviors were documented to justify her Wellbutrin (is a prescription medicine used to treat adults with a certain type of depression called major depressive disorder, and for the prevention of [NAME]-winter seasonal depression (seasonal affective disorder)) dosage increase on 11/22/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 had behavior and side effect monitoring for her prescribed anticonvulsant, Depakote. The facility failed to ensure Resident #110 had side effect monitoring for her prescribed Trazadone. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their psychotropic medications and unnecessary medication use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 7 of 28 residents (Resident's #10, #13, #17, #34, # 60, # 86 and #101) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Resident #10, Resident #13, Resident #34, Resident #60, Resident #86 and Resident #101, who complained the food was bland, and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: During an interview on 01/13/2025 at 10:54 a.m., Resident #34 stated the food was terrible, no taste at all. During an interview on at 01/13/2025 11:08 a.m., Resident #60 stated the food was not good, it had no flavor. During an interview on 01/13/25 at 11:15 a.m., Resident #17 said the flavor and temperature of the food was not good sometimes. During an interview on 01/13/2025 at 11:16 a.m., Resident #86 stated the food was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #66 and Resident #17) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility did not ensure CNA Q and CNA R explained the procedure before initiating the transfer and incontinent care provided on 12/21/2024 to Resident #66. 2. The facility failed to provide scheduled smoke breaks for Resident #17 who resided on the memory care, secured unit. The failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 01/15/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), protein-calorie malnutrition (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 3 of 17 residents reviewed for the right to be informed. (Resident #68, Resident #79, and Resident #108) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's Consent for Antipsychotic (used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) or Neuroleptic (also known as Antipsychotic) Medication Treatment HHSC Form 3713 was correctly completed for Abilify (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) as evidenced by there was no clinical indications for use, no dosage or frequency, and no side effects, risks, or benefits listed for the proposed treatment. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's Consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic Medication Treatment HHSC Form 3713 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 21) reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's floors were free of debris, dust, and shreds of papers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's dresser was free from a white creamy substance on the top flat surface, side of dresser and front of the dresser. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's bathroom cabinet was clean from a dried sticky red liquid . The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's personal refrigerator door was free from white splattered dried substances. These failures could place residents at risk for an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 01/15/2025 indicated, Resident #21 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of the residents to be free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to keep Resident #66 free from abuse when CNA Q and CNA R roughly provided mechanical lift transfer and incontinent care to her on 12/21/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, creased resistance to care, increased agitation, skin tears, soreness, and injury Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 01/15/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), protein-calorie malnutrition (the state of inadequate intake of food), muscle wasting, lack of coordination and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/04/2024, reflected Resident #66…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged or as soon as practicable before transfer or discharge when a resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #169) reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility failed to provide Resident #169's representative with a written 30-day discharge notice with a reason of discharge. This failure could place residents at risk of improper discharge planning and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #169's face sheet dated 01/15/2025 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (difficulty breathing), congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump efficiently), cognitive communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 34 residents (Resident #79) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #79 was receiving Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel), an antipsychotic medication (used to treat certain mental/mood disorders). These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #79's face sheet dated 1/14/25 revealed she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #79 had diagnoses including depressive episodes, anxiety disorder, multiple rib fractures (broken bones), repeated falls, lack of coordination, shortness of breath, heart failure, and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #79's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had a BIMS of 13, which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #79…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. Resident #39's PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnoses major depressive disorder were diagnosed on [DATE] . This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 10/2/13 , indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted most recently on 05/31/24 . His diagnoses included major depressive disorder (A mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety disorder (Mental health conditions that cause excessive and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 28 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #5, Resident #46, and Resident #51) The facility did not ensure Resident #5, Resident # 46, and Resident # 51 did not have chin hair on 01/13/2025 and 01/14/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care or services, decreased quality of life, embarrassment, and decreased self-esteem. The findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet, dated 10/17/2024, revealed Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of multiple sclerosis ( a chronic disease that damages the central nervous system), unspecified dementia ( general term for dementia that doesn't have a specific diagnosis), muscle weakness ( a lack of muscle strength that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #66). The facility failed to ensure a safe environment when CNA Q and CNA R walked away and left Resident #66 unsupervised at bedside during a mechanical lift transfer on 12/21/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, falls and hospitalizations. Findings include: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 01/15/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), protein-calorie malnutrition (the state of inadequate intake of food), muscle wasting, lack of coordination and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/04/2024, reflected Resident #66…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to follow the dietician's recommendation to increase Resident #23's Med Pass 120ml TID to QID ordered on 11/15/24 and 12/06/24. This failure placed resident at risk for malnutrition and weight loss. Findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 01/13/25 indicated Resident #23 was an 86-years-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #23 had diagnoses including dementia (is a general term for a decline in mental abilities that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities), protein-calorie malnutrition (refers to a nutritional status in which reduced availability of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 1 of 28 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's Wellbutrin (is a prescription medicine used to treat adults with a certain type of depression called major depressive disorder, and for the prevention of [NAME]-winter seasonal depression (seasonal affective disorder)) SR Oral Tablet Extended Release 200mg was available for administration on 10/13/24, 10/14/24 and 11/04/24. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet dated 01/13/25 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #17 had diagnoses including dementia (is the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 9 med carts and 2 of 36 Residents (Resident #10, Resident # 39) reviewed for medication storage. 1.The facility failed to securely store prescription medication Nystop powder 100,000 units and Venelex 60-gram ointment for Resident #10. 2. The facility failed to keep medication being administered under the direct observation of the person administering medications. Resident #39 had a medication cup, with approximately 10 medications in pill form in it, sitting on his bedside table. 3. The facility failed to ensure CMA J secured the medication cart for Hall 200. These failures could place residents at risk for health complications and not having received the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications and adverse reaction. Findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet dated 1/15/2025 indicated Resident #10 was [AGE] years old and was readmitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 12 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #61). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #61 did not contain spoiled milk and the surfaces were clean. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 01/25/22 indicated Resident #61 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Paranoid Schizophrenia (A person believes something that is not real is real. For example, they may believe that people are trying to harm them), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing foods or liquids, arising from the throat or esophagus, ranging from mild difficulty to complete and painful blockage), and Dementia (a general term for a group of neurological conditions that affect the brain and cause a decline in mental abilities).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #51 and Resident #66). 1. LVN G failed to use enhanced barrier precautions by donning a gown when performing gastrostomy tube feeding on Resident #51. 2. CNA Q and CNA R failed to change their gloves while performing incontinent care on Resident #66 and touched the resident and clean surfaces with soiled gloves . These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 01/14/2025 indicated Resident #51 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to fourteen (14) days for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications review. (Residents #1 and #2). 1.Resident #1 had a PRN order for Lorazepam, a psychotropic medication, for more than fourteen days without physician documentation re-evaluating the medication to continue it PRN or to become a scheduled medication. 2. Resident #2 had a PRN order for Lorazepam, a psychotropic medication, for more than fourteen days without physician documentation re-evaluating the medication to continue it PRN or to become a scheduled medication. This failure could place residents who receive PRN psychotropic medications at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications . Findings included: 1.Record review of the undated face sheet indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female that admitted [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure menus and nutritional adequacy met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for 2 of 2 observed meals reviewed for meal accuracy. The facility failed to ensure there was 7 days' worth of food available from 09/01/2024 through 09/03/2024 to prepare and serve their planned and/or alternate menu on 09/01/2024 through 09/03/2024 for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. This deficient practice could place residents at increased risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: During an observation on 09/02/2024 at 12:19 PM, in the facility's main dining room, revealed the following: -Lunch served was ½ of a grilled cheese sandwich, 1 bowl of vegetable soup, and a piece of German chocolate cake. -Dry pantry revealed: (2) 6.56-pound cans of corn, (2) 104-ounce cans of sliced apples, (1) 6.12 pound can of black beans, (10) 14.5-ounce cans of diced red peppers, (11) 35-ounce bags of dry cereal, (1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's NP when she had a worsening of her skin conditions. This failure could result in residents not receiving treatments, supplements, or medications to maintain health. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/24/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute pyelonephritis (sudden and severe infection of the kidney due to a bacterial infection), paraplegia (paralysis of all or part of your trunk, legs, and pelvic organs), and diabetes mellitus due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provided supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's call light was answered promptly by LVN A. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from accidents and hazards. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of unspecified part of left clavicle (collarbone), displaced fracture of coracoid process (fracture of a part of the shoulder), left shoulder, multiple fractures of ribs, bilateral, and unspecified fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra (back bone fracture). Record review of the electronic health record on [DATE] indicated Resident #2 did not have an MDS assessment due to recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A accurately documented on Resident #1's February 2023 MAR. The facility failed to ensure LVN B and LVN C documented accurate skin assessments for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of pressure injuries, medication errors, and not receiving medications and required treatments as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/24/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute pyelonephritis (sudden and severe infection of the kidney due to a bacterial infection), paraplegia (paralysis of all or part of your trunk, legs, and pelvic organs), and diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's call light was functioning properly. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, falls, and unmet needs. The findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of unspecified part of left clavicle (collarbone), displaced fracture of coracoid process (fracture of a part of the shoulder), left shoulder, multiple fractures of ribs, bilateral, and unspecified fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra (back bone fracture). Record review of the electronic health record on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. Hamburger meat was thawed improperly. 2. The paper towel dispenser was empty at the handwashing station. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: During an observation on 11/27/23 at 9:00 a.m., it was observed that the handwashing station did not have a way to dry hands as the paper towel dispenser was empty. Surveyor was unable to dry their hands after washing upon entry. It was observed that hamburger meat, approximately 10-20 pounds, was thawing on top of a table uncovered in a large metal container. Over the course of the initial tour, approximately 20 minutes, the hamburger meat was not handled or prepared by staff . During an interview on 11/29/23 at 11:15 a.m. with the Director of Nursing, she said kitchen staff should thaw meat according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property was provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #15) The facility failed to prevent a diversion (misappropriation) of Resident #15's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) 7.5-325mg tablets (a combined hydrocodone/acetaminophen narcotic pain reliever) on 11/4/23 and 11/27/23. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, unrelieved pain, misappropriation of property, and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 11/27/23 indicated Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and 06/28/22 with diagnoses including pain in unspecified joint and chronic pain syndrome (occurs when pain remains long after an illness or injury has healed). Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 was understood and had the ability to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #44, Resident #89, Resident #98, and Resident #106) The facility failed to implement fall prevention intervention of fall mats at bedside for Resident #44. The facility failed to implement the care plan intervention for Resident #89 to administer wound care treatment as ordered. The facility failed to develop care plan interventions after Resident #98 had a fall. The facility failed to ensure LVN B performed Resident #106's wound care to multiple wounds as ordered by the physician per the care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met in a timely manner and could result in a decline in physical well-being and care needs not being addressed. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 11/27/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 6 of 24 residents (Resident #38, #61, #7, #56, #82 and #90) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide oral care for Resident #38 and #61. The facility failed to provide scheduled showers and/or bed baths to Resident #7, Resident #56, Resident #82, and Resident #90. The facility failed to provide nail care to Resident #56 and Resident #90. The facility failed to removal facial hair from Resident #56. The facility failed to provide scheduled hair washing for Resident #82. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1. Record Review of Resident #38's face sheet revealed a 91-year- old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 6 of 10 residents (Resident #7, # 14, # 18, # 20, # 23, and Resident # 82) reviewed for respiratory care in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had water in his humidification canister (aids in preventing a patient's airways from becoming dry). The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 nebulizer mask (provide vaporized medicine into the airway) was stored in a bag after use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7, Resident #23, and Resident #82's nasal cannula (is a medical device to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels) were labeled and dated. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14, Resident #18, and Resident #20 had oxygen concentrator filters (are used within the machine to remove particles and contaminants from entering your lungs for an improved therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 2 of 4 licensed staff (LVN W, LVN N) reviewed for nursing competencies. The facility failed to ensure LVN W and LVN N followed Resident #88's physician orders to not give Novolog (is a fast-acting injectable insulin that can be prescribed for people with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes) when blood glucose results were less than 120. This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at an increased and unnecessary risk of exposure to staff who lack the appropriate skills competencies to provide care that is safe and capable of minimizing accidents from procedural errors and errors in medication administration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #88's face sheet dated 11/28/23 indicated Resident #88 was [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] and 08/31/23 with a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs for 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for storage of medication. (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]) The facility failed to ensure the narcotic box was permanently affixed inside the refrigerator in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure could place residents that take narcotics that required refrigeration at risk of misappropriation of drugs. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 11/28/23 at 1:20 PM, ADON A went in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] with this surveyor. She unlocked the Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] door, then opened the small unlocked refrigerator which contained a metal-type box with a handle. The refrigerator was not locked and did not have a lock on it. The (locked) box inside the refrigerator was not secured or affixed to the small refrigerator. ADON A said the narcotic box used to be attached to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident #89) The facility failed to provide Resident #89 a privacy bag (helps maintains dignity of catheterized patients by restoring a sense of privacy) for his suprapubic catheter bag (collects urine by attaching to a drainage bag). This failure placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/28/23 indicated Resident #89 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including paraplegia (is a specific pattern of paralysis (which is when you can't deliberately control or move your muscles) that affects your legs), pressure ulcer of left buttock, sacral region, and right buttock, stage 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents had the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care, and to ensure that the planning process facilitated the inclusion of the residents and/or representatives for 1 (Resident #82) of 22 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility failed to schedule Resident #82's care plan meeting on a non-dialysis day (Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays) so she could attend. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving adequate or individualized care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #82's face sheet dated 11/27/23 indicated Resident #82 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] and 08/04/23 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs can't release enough oxygen into your blood), congestive heart failure (the heart's capacity to pump blood cannot keep up with the body's need), end stage renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident physician when there was significant change in the resident physical condition for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for change in condition. (Resident #88) The facility failed to notify MD U of Resident #88's elevated blood sugar glucose. This failure could result in diabetic residents not receiving appropriate treatment for elevated blood sugars. Findings included: Record review of Resident #88's face sheet dated 11/28/23 indicated Resident #88 was [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and 08/31/23 with a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (is a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high.) with hyperglycemia (happens when there's too much sugar (glucose) in your blood). Record review of Resident #88's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #88 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #88 had a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #89) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's room did not have peeling ceiling plaster (room [ROOM NUMBER]). The facility failed to ensure Resident #89's bathroom did not have plumbing issue and a warped vanity (room [ROOM NUMBER]). These failures placed resident at risk for diminished quality of life, harm, injury, and falls. Findings included: During an interview and observation on 11/27/23 at 11:34 a.m., Resident #22 said she did not like the peeling ceiling plaster by her door. She said it made her nervous it was going to fall on her. She said the area started small then got bigger. She said it had been like that since she moved into the room [ROOM NUMBER]-4 months ago. Resident #22 was sitting in her wheelchair by the room's door. On Resident #22's ceiling, a small area popcorn ceiling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental disorders were evaluated and received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #11) reviewed for PASRR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to complete a PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #11 following a discharge from a mental health hospital with a new diagnosis of mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not being evaluated for PASRR services and receiving needed services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 11/27/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #11's had diagnoses which included dementia, bipolar (mental disorder that is characterized by mood swings that last more than 2 weeks), and depression (state of sadness). Record review of Resident #11's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had a BIMS of 07, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #36, Resident #89) and 4 of 4 staff (CNA O, CNA S, CNA R, and CNA AA) reviewed for transfer. The facility failed to ensure CNA O, CNA S, CNA R, and CNA AA performed a safe mechanical lift transfer (devices used to assist with transfers and movement of individuals who require support for mobility beyond the manual support provided by caregivers alone) for Resident #36 and Resident #89. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from accident and hazards. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 11/29/23 indicated Resident #36 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] and 02/26/20 with diagnoses including paraplegia (is a term used to describe the inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body), reduced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #82) The facility failed to consistently document Resident #82's dialysis communication form. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #82's face sheet dated 11/27/23 indicated Resident #82 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] and 08/04/23 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs can't release enough oxygen into your blood), congestive heart failure (the heart's capacity to pump blood cannot keep up with the body's need), end stage renal disease (is when you have permanent kidney failure that requires a regular course of dialysis or a kidney transplant), type 2 diabetes mellitus (is a condition that happens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 8 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety. (Resident #62). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #62 did not contain expired foods. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/29/2023 indicated Resident #62 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Contracture of the right hand (a shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff), Muscle Weakness (commonly due to lack of exercise, ageing, muscle injury or pregnancy), Acute Kidney Failure (a sudden episode of kidney failure or kidney damage that happens within a few hours or a few day.) Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #62 understood others and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident #112) The facility failed to ensure LVN B performed proper hand hygiene while performing wound care for Resident #112. The facility failed to ensure LVN B change residents soiled linens before allowing resident to return to bed after clean wound dressing applied to his posterior buttocks. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross- contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #112's face sheet dated 11/29/2023 indicated Resident #112 was a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE], with the diagnosis including Cardiomegaly (A condition with bigger (enlarged) heart than the normal.), Hidradenitis suppurativa (A long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 2 of 6 resident wheelchairs reviewed for essential equipment. (Resident #20 and #54) The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's wheelchair had a non-functioning left break. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's wheelchair had two non-functioning breaks. This deficient practice could result in resident falls and injury while using their wheelchairs. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 11/27/2023, revealed Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #20 had diagnoses of DM II (A chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar (glucose), COPD (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and emphysema (develops over time and involves the gradual damage of lung tissue, specifically the destruction of the alveoli…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$225,427 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $73,554 — penalty dated 2025-05-16
  • $145,009 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
  • $6,864 — penalty dated 2024-02-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBastrop, TX 1 of 5Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMcAllen, TX 1 of 5Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrownsville, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Transitional Care CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 1 of 5Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Jefferson Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLaredo, TX 1 of 5Lavaca Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 1 of 5Spindletop Hill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Town and Country Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBoerne, TX 1 of 5Wharton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWharton, TX 1 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of RaymoRaymondville, TX 2 of 5Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrenham, TX 2 of 5Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Corpus Christi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 2 of 5Elgin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElgin, TX 2 of 5Guadalupe Valley Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSeguin, TX 2 of 5Hallettsville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville, TX 2 of 5Heritage Park Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CAustin, TX 2 of 5Live Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGeorge West, TX 2 of 5Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEagle Pass, TX 2 of 5Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 2 of 5Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRobstown, TX 2 of 5Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteAustin, TX 2 of 5Windsor AtriumHarlingen, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of SeguiSeguin, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of WeslaWeslaco, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of AliceAlice, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of BastrBastrop, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of MorgaCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Yoakum Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterYoakum, TX 3 of 5Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHarlingen, TX 3 of 5Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteHouston, TX 3 of 5Port Lavaca Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterThe Woodlands, TX 3 of 5Val Verde Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDel Rio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Mission OaksSan Antonio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of DuvalAustin, TX

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HOPKINS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/16/2014
BAIRD, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/13/2021
CARVAJAL, ANTONIOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/16/2024
CLAPP, BARBARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2021
CORTESE, DARENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
GIBSON, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2021
GONZALES, VERONICAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/16/2024
KAUFMAN, NICOLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
MANDELBAUM, ELLIOTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/01/2022
BLACK, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2012
BROWN, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/28/2019
BURGIN, JOEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/1998
LAW, KERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/12/2020
MEJIA, MARIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/26/2023
SHULTZ, KRISTIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/19/2019
SMITH, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/06/2021
WRIGHT, TAMMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SANDERS, LEOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
ZARCONE, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
3201 N FOURTH STREET LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
DWD TX HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REG BRIDGE OPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REG HG OPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REGENCY IHS OF LONGVIEW LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REGENCY IHS REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
DEKOWSKI, DONOVANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
JONES, DARNESHIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
POOLE, JODYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 4%Other / private 10%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$256per resident / day
operating cost
$7,790per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$216per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455684. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next