No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

320 Lorenaly Dr, Brownsville, TX 78520 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (956) 350-2252 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$57,708 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,708 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4770 N Expressway · (956) 550-9020 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
301 E Morrison Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
515 Morrison Rd · (956) 338-1817 · Call to confirm hours
Park
420 Trailwind Way · (956) 542-2064 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4614 N Expressway · (956) 371-8521

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.8%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.2%12.3%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.3%CMS range 51.9–70.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.4–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified68.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 2.7–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
62.0%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.03 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accidents, hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance while providing care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received supervision when outside in his wheelchair. Resident #1 wheeled his way down the parking lot to the road, flipping his wheelchair where the parking lot met the roadway pinning Resident #1 on the roadway where he was unable to get up. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate jeopardy began on 12/31/2024 and ended on 01/02/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the building by causing resident injuries, such as falls, fractures, and even death due to improper supervision. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-08 · tag F0635 — pattern
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to have physician orders for the resident's immediate care at time of admission for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for physician admission orders. 1.Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have orders in place for blood sugar checks and had an episode of low blood sugar on 04/08/25 that required him to be sent to hospital. 2.Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have wound care orders in place for identified impaired skin intergrity until 04/07/25. An IJ was identified on 05/06/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:18PM . While the IJ was removed on 05/08/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These deficient practices could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. 1.Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have orders in place for wound care for MASD to sacrum, diabetic wound to left heel and left dorsum foot or abrasion to penis until 04/07/25. 2. Resident #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have orders in place for blood sugar checks and had an episode of low blood sugar on 04/08/25 that required him to be sent to hospital. An IJ was identified on 05/06/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:18PM . While the IJ was removed on 05/08/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right for a resident to refuse or discontinue treatment for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for resident rights. The DON, failed to stop Depakote after Resident #1's RP requested the medication be stopped immediately on [DATE]. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in residents believing their right to refuse a medication does not matter. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), and dementia, unspecified (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems. Symptoms may also include personality changes). Record review of Resident #1's [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure review and revision of comprehensive care plans for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions in that: The facility failed to review and revise Resident #1's comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the initiation of Depakote, an antiseizure medication used for mood disorder. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 11/26/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), and dementia, unspecified (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems. Symptoms may also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care, in that: The facility failed to consult with Resident #1's physician concerning the discontinuation of Depakote at RP's request. These failures placed residents in the facility at risk for not receiving care according to professional standards.The findings were:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), and dementia, unspecified (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems. Symptoms may also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had orders in place for wound care for arterial wounds to his left dorsum foot, right dorsum foot, left plantar foot, right plantar foot, right palm, right dorsum hand and surgical wound with 12 sutures to left plantar 3rd digit - amputation site until 08/19/25, after the resident was readmitted on [DATE], This deficient practice could place residents at risk for receiving inadequate treatments which could result in the worsening of the wounds. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/31/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for storage, preparation and sanitation. 1.The facility failed to ensure the juice gun nozzle, coffee maker, cabinets, drinking glasses, pitchers, and utensils were clean. 2.The facility failed to ensure the area under a prep sink was free from water damage and debris. 3.The facility failed to ensure the underside of the shelf on the stove, directly above cooking food, was kept clean. 4.The facility failed to ensure dirty utensils were not kept in a clean drawer. 5.The facility to ensure dry storage items were not left on the floor. 6.The facility failed to ensure spices were not left open to air when not in use. 7.The facility failed to ensure leftovers in refrigerator #2 were labeled and dated. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food contamination and food borne illness. Findings included: Observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #97, Resident #111 , ) reviewed for infection control practices. 1.The facility failed to ensure proper contact precautions for infections of ESBL and MRSA were followed for Resident #97 to prevent cross-contamination and possible infection. 2.The facility failed to ensure proper contact isolation precautions were followed for Resident #9 to prevent cross-contamination and spread of infection. 3.The facility failed to ensure proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for Resident #111 when checking blood sugar and administering insulin. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination, infection, and improper wound healing. Findings included: 1.Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of accidents or hazards as possible for 1 of 5 residents' (Resident #29 and Resident #70) bathrooms reviewed for environment.The facility failed to maintain and ensure all chemicals were labeled appropriately and put away appropriately out of Resident #29 and #70's shared bathroom.This failure could place residents at risk for injury.The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #29's face sheet dated 08/12/25 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 09/16/2019. Pertinent diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (progressive decline in memory, thinking, and behavior), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty in communication which arises from impaired cognitive functions), and Unspecified Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities).Record review of Resident #29's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #35 ) whose records were reviewed for weight loss. Nursing staff failed to follow physician orders to weigh Resident #35 weekly for four weeks, effective 07/17/25. This deficient practice could affect residents at risk for losing weight and result in unplanned weight loss and a decline in the resident's overall health.The findings were:Record review of Resident #35's admission record dated 08/12/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old-female with an admit date of 07/17/25. Her relevant diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs, which may fill with fluid),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident#2) reviewed for oxygen in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen was administered at the correct setting of 2 liters per minute on 08/10/2025 as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. The findings included: Record review of Resident 2's electronic admission record dated 08/10/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 04/15/2025 and with an initial admit date of 04/24/2024. Pertinent diagnoses included Nonspecific Abnormal Findings of Lung Field, Dementia, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (loss of muscle tissue), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were secured and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and standards for 1 of 4 medication carts (400 Hall Med-Aide Medication Cart) reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure the 400 Hall Med-Aide medication cart was locked and secured. This failure could place the residents at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications that were not prescribed to them. Findings included: In an observation on 08/10/25 at 11:34 AM, the med-cart which belonged to the 400 Hall Med-Aide was noted to be unlock, and the Med-Aide was noted to be off the unit. In an interview on 08/10/25 at 11:37 AM Med-Aide-C stated she knew she was supposed to lock her medication cart when she was away from it. She stated if the cart was left unlocked anyone could have gotten into it and taken medication which did not belong to them, and it could have made them sick, or even caused death. In an interview on 08/12/25 at 11:04 AM the DON stated nurses and med-aides should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #100) reviewed for pureed diet needs. The facility failed to provide Resident #100 with her regular pureed diet (that was prescribed for individuals who have difficulty chewing or swallowing food) as designated on her meal ticket on 08/10/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for poor food intake, weight loss, and not having their nutritional needs met. Record review of Resident #100‘s face sheet dated 11/23/21 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Stroke, Muscle wasting, and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of Resident #100‘s quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident had active diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer’s, Aphasia (difficulty speaking), dysphasia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property for 6 of 8 residents (Residents #6, #9, #7, and R#10) reviewed for abuse. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was free from abuse when Resident #7 dug her nails on Resident #6's left forearm that resulted with multiple skin tears with serosanguineous drainage on 01/02/2025. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 was free from abuse when Resident #6 hit Resident 9 on her upper left arm with a closed hand on 03/25/2025.3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from abuse when Resident #2 slapped Resident #7 on the left side of the face with a closed hand on 03/25/2025. 4.The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from abuse when Resident #6 grabbed Resident #7 by the hair and arm on 04/11/2025. 5.The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was free from abuse when Resident #6 rolled his wheelchair towards her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 3 (Resident #5, Resident #3, and Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to report allegations of resident neglect for Resident #5 to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame of 2 hours on 05/24/25 when Resident #5 had a fall at around 7:30 AM and sustained a serious bodily injury (distal fibular diametaphyseal fracture). The facility failed to report two Resident – to – Resident altercations. One on 11/15/24 between Resident #3 and Resident #2. The other occurred on 03/25/25 with Resident #2 and an unknown resident. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 3 (Resident #2, Resident#3, Resident #4) of 5 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. 1.The facility failed to ensure LVN A and LVN F correctly completed Resident #4's neuro checks between 05/24/25 and 05/27/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented on Resident #4's electronic medical record; he had a nosebleed after the fall he sustained on 05/24/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's left inferior orbital wall fracture was documented on his electronic medical record. 4. The facility failed to ensure two Resident-to-Resident altercations were documented thoroughly. One altercation between residents on 11/15/2024 between Resident #3 and Resident #2, and the other altercation occurred on 03/25/2025 with Resident #2 and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be informed of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3, Resident #6 ) reviewed for consent for antipsychotic medications in that: 1. Resident #3 was prescribed and administered Haldol (an antipsychotic) without prior consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available. 2. The facility failed to ensure psychoactive medication consents for Resident #6's were signed and dated by his guardian for the use of Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication), Buspirone (anxiolytic medication), lorazepam (benzodiazepine medication), and Risperidone (antipsychotic medication). These failures could affect the right to self-determination of all facility residents who receive medication by allowing them to receive medication without their prior knowledge or consent, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was evaluated before administering an antipsychotic (Haldol). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 06/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 08/15/2024, and a re-admission date on 11/25/2024, with a diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance (delusions and hallucinations), mood disturbance, and anxiety, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near the brain that can happen after a head injury) with loss of consciousness of 30 minutes or less. Record review of Resident #3's admission MDS, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial need that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans.The facility failed to develop interventions in a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #2 to address his behavior of putting small items in his mouth such as crayons.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs.The Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated , revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 07/06/2021,with a diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for 4 residents (Residents, #1, #2, #7, and #6) of 10 residents reviewed comprehensive care plan revisions. 1.The facility failed to review and revise Resident #1's comprehensive person-centered care plan from Full Code Status to DNR Status when ordered DNR was dated [DATE]. 2.The facility failed to review and revise Resident #7's comprehensive person-centered care plan when he had a resident-to-resident altercation with Resident #6 when she grabbed his left forearm and pierced skin with her fingernails which caused multiple skin tears on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m., 3. The facility failed to review and revise Resident #2's comprehensive person-centered care plan when he had a resident-to-resident altercation with Resident #7 when he striked her on the face with a closed hand on [DATE] at 3:00 p.m. 4.The facility failed to review and revise Resident #6's comprehensive person-centered care plan when he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets that were prescribed by the attending physician for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for therapeutic diets.The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received a house shake on 07/14/2025 with his breakfast tray as ordered by his physician with orders dated 07/11/2025 for a house shake with meals for malnutrition and a revised order effective 07/14/2025 for a house shake with meals for supplement.This failure could place residents at risk for poor intake, weight loss, unmet nutritional needs, and a loss of dignity.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #8's admission sheet dated 07/14/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 01/14/2020, with a diagnoses which included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), cognitive communication deficit (deficits in communication skills resulting from cognitive impairments like attention, memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to verify there was a physician's order for Haldol (an antipsychotic) and to ensure the order had an indication of its use. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving an antipsychotic medication without a physician's order or an indication for use resulting in a resident receiving a medication which could cause a decline in health status. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 06/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 08/15/2024, and a re-admission date on 11/25/2024, with a diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance (delusions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility failed to act on the facility's Pharmacy Consultant recommendations for Resident #3 ' s Haldol order for 1. An approved psychiatric diagnosis and 2. To have an informed consent on file. This failure could place residents receiving antipsychotic medications at risk for adverse consequences and could cause a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 06/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 08/15/2024, and a re-admission date on 11/25/2024, with a diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance (delusions and hallucinations), mood disturbance, and anxiety, and traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to have an adequate indication for the use of the medication Haldol (an antipsychotic) for Resident #3 before administering the medication with a black box warning. This failure could put residents at risk of harm from adverse reactions or harmful side effects. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 06/17/2025, revealed an admission date of 08/15/2024, and a re-admission date on 11/25/2024, with a diagnoses which included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance (delusions and hallucinations), mood disturbance, and anxiety, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near the brain that can happen after a head injury) with loss of consciousness of 30 minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2 and Resident #7) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: 1. Resident #1's March 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documentation was incomplete. Staff did not sign off on the treatment ordered for Resident #1's wound care. 2. Resident #2's March 2025 TAR documentation was incomplete. Staff did not sign off on the treatment ordered for Resident #2's wound care. Resident #2's April Medication Administration Record (MAR) was incomplete. Staff did not document and sign off on Resident #2's blood sugar checks and insulin orders. 3. Resident #7's April and May 2025 MAR documentation was incomplete. Staff did not document and sign off on Resident #7's order for sliding scale insulin. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility did not include Resident #1's wound and physician ordered wound care on his care plan. 2. The facility did not include Resident #2's diet and the need for crushed medications on their care plan. 3. The facility did not include Resident #3's diet and the need for crushed medications on their care plan. 4. The facility did not include Resident #2's diet and the need for crushed medications on their care plan. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate treatment and services. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/12/24, revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #3 and #4), reviewed for pharmaceutical services. 1. The facility failed to obtain and input orders for crushed medication for Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to obtain and input orders for crushed medication for Resident #4. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medication safely. 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/11/24, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by problems with your metabolism), acute systolic (congestive) heart failure (when the left ventricle of the heart cant pump blood efficiently), pleural effusion (accumulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure accurate acquiring and administering of all drugs to meet the need of the resident for four residents (Resident #12, Resident #23, Resident #35, Resident #63) of ten residents reviewed for medications. 1. Resident #12 had four unidentified pills and two capsules in a medication cup on his overbed table that Resident #12 had not taken. 2. The Medication Aide left Resident #12's medications on his bedside table and documented that the medications had been administered. 3. Resident #23 had five medications that were not signed off on the MAR on 06/16/2024 and 06/24/2024. 4. Resident #35 had two medications that were not signed off on the MAR on 06/16/2024 and 06/24/2024. 5. Resident #63 had three medication that were not signed off on the MAR on 06/16/2024 and 06/24/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications as ordered by their physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preference for two (resident #90 and resident #98) of four residents reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Resident #90 and Resident #98's call lights were within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings were: 1.Record review of Resident #90's admission record dated 06/27/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Hemiplegia (one sided weakness) and Hemiparesis (weakness of 1 side of body) following cerebral infraction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, and Need for Assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #90's Quarterly Care Plan revised 12/19/23 revealed the Resident was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate advance directives for 1 (Resident #356) of 20 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #356s code status was entered in the records at the facility. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored, such as receiving unwanted resuscitative measures. Findings included: Record review of Resident #356's electronic face sheet dated [DATE] reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and original admission date [DATE]. His diagnoses included Nontraumatic Acute Subdural Hemorrhage (buildup of blood on the surface of the brain), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Hemiplegia (one sided muscle paralysis or weakness), Essential Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #356's Brief Interview of Mental Status Form had a BIMS score of 10, indicating Resident #356 cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of 1 (Resident #356) of 4 residents reviewed for baseline care plan completion. The facility failed to complete the advance directive section in the baseline care plan for Resident #356 within the required 48-hour timeframe. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored, such as receiving unwanted resuscitative measures. Findings included: Record review of Resident #356's electronic face sheet dated 06/24/24 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and original admission date 02/13/2024. No advance directive information on this form. His diagnoses included Nontraumatic Acute Subdural Hemorrhage (buildup of blood on the surface of the brain), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Hemiplegia (one sided muscle paralysis or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #63's comprehensive care plan dated 05/29/2024 reflected she was in the secured unit due to a high risk of elopement. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and no having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's face sheet dated 06/11/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 07/11/2023. Resident #63's relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #255) reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility failed to prevent Resident #255's urinary catheter tubing from touching the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #255's admission record dated 06/25/24 reflected Resident #255 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #255 was an [AGE] year-old male with diagnosis which included benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (an age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty), and acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly cannot filter waste from the blood. Acute kidney failure develops rapidly over a few hours or days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #258 and Resident #260) reviewed for oxygen in that: 1.Resident #258's oxygen was administered at 3.5 Lpm instead of 2 Lpm via nasal cannula as ordered by physician. 2.Resident #260's oxygen was administered at 2.5 Lpm instead of 3.0 Lpm via nasal cannula as ordered by physician. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased qualify of care. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #258's admission Record dated 06/25/24, revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to facility on 06/14/24. Her diagnosis included: Acute respiratory failure (a sudden inability to maintain adequate oxygenation for tissues or adequate removal of carbon dioxide from tissues), chronic pulmonary edema (a long-term condition that occurs when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #1 and #2) of 7 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded in the MDS for a fall. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was coded in the MDS for a fall. This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. Resident #1 had diagnoses of Dementia, lack of coordination, Parkinson's(A chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness or slowing of movement) and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan reflected: The resident has had an actual fall r/t Poor Balance, Poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enact a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed, in that: A plastic bag with food inside that contained tamales was found in Resident #1's night stand. The food was unlabeled, undated and not refrigerated. This deficient practice could lead to illness due to foodborne pathogens. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's physician orders dated 05/29/24 revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. Resident #1 had diagnoses of Dementia, lack of coordination, Parkinson's (A chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness or slowing of movement) and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed: A score of 8 (moderately impaired) for Brief Interview of Mental status.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (R #1) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility did not document R #1's urostomy bag was changed in the TAR on 01/24/24, 01/31/24 and 02/14/24. The facility did not document a for R #1's left ankle pain on 02/10/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and services due to inaccurate reflection of care provided. The findings included: Record review of R #1's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male with original admission date of 01/23/24. His diagnosis included: Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed), type 2 diabetes, acute and subacute endocarditis (inflammation of the inner lining of the heart chambers and valves), hypertension, acute infarction of small intestine (loss of blood flow to the small intestine), peritoneal abscess (intra-abdominal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 8 residents (Resident # 91) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plan in that: Resident #91's comprehensive care plan did not reflect the severe weight loss of the resident. This failure could affect residents who require care at the facility and could result in a deterioration of the resident's health status. The findings were: Record review of Resident #91's face sheet dated 3/28/2023 revealed an eighty-four year old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Displaced Intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (a specific type of hip fracture of the bones between the bony protrusions on the thighbone); essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure); unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart); benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed. 1 medication was found to be expired in the 200 Hall medication cart. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk for administering medication incorrectly or missing a dose of medications that could result in ineffective treatment and/or exacerbation of the disease process. Findings include: During an observation on 3/29/2023 at 8:45 AM of the 200 Hall medication cart, 1 bottle of Morphine 100mg/5ml (a non-synthetic narcotic with a high potential for abuse derived from opium that is used for the treatment of pain) was found to have expired January 2023. During an interview with ADON A on 3/29/2023 at 8:52 AM ADON A agreed that the bottle of Morphine 100 mg/5ml had an expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed. The narcotic lock box located in the medication room refrigerator was not affixed to the refrigerator. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk for administering medication incorrectly of missing a dose of medications that could result in ineffective treatment and/or exacerbation of the disease process. Findings include: During an observation on 3/29/2023 at 8:30 AM of the medication storage room, the narcotic locked box located inside of the refrigerator was not affixed to the refrigerator. During and interview on 3/29/2023 at 8:35 AM with the DON, the DON acknowledged that the narcotic lock box was not affixed to the refrigerator. The DON stated the consequence of the locked box not being secured would be that someone could take the whole box or leave all the medications located in the box unrefrigerated. During an interview with the ADM on 3/30/2023 at 11:55AM the ADM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 (Resident #249 and Resident #252) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure MA A disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Resident #252 and Resident #249. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: Observation on 3/28/2023 at 3:52 PM revealed MA A removed the blood pressure cuff from the medication cart. She did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff. MA A placed the blood pressure cuff on Resident #252's wrist. After blood pressure reading was completed, MA A did not clean the blood pressure cuff by sanitizing it with the disinfecting wipes on her cart. The blood pressure cuff was placed on top of the medication cart. Observation on 3/28/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,708 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $10,361 — penalty dated 2025-07-15
  • $47,347 — penalty dated 2025-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBastrop, TX 1 of 5Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMcAllen, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Transitional Care CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 1 of 5Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Jefferson Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLaredo, TX 1 of 5Lavaca Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 1 of 5Longview Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Spindletop Hill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Town and Country Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBoerne, TX 1 of 5Wharton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWharton, TX 1 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of RaymoRaymondville, TX 2 of 5Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrenham, TX 2 of 5Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Corpus Christi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 2 of 5Elgin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElgin, TX 2 of 5Guadalupe Valley Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSeguin, TX 2 of 5Hallettsville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville, TX 2 of 5Heritage Park Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CAustin, TX 2 of 5Live Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGeorge West, TX 2 of 5Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEagle Pass, TX 2 of 5Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 2 of 5Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRobstown, TX 2 of 5Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteAustin, TX 2 of 5Windsor AtriumHarlingen, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of SeguiSeguin, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of WeslaWeslaco, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of AliceAlice, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of BastrBastrop, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of MorgaCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Yoakum Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterYoakum, TX 3 of 5Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHarlingen, TX 3 of 5Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteHouston, TX 3 of 5Port Lavaca Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterThe Woodlands, TX 3 of 5Val Verde Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDel Rio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Mission OaksSan Antonio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of DuvalAustin, TX

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VAL VERDE COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/01/2022
REGENCY IHS OF BROWNSVILLE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
DWD TX HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
REG LEASED OPCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
BAIRD, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/13/2021
CARVAJAL, ANTONIOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/16/2024
CLAPP, BARBARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2021
CORTESE, DARENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
DIAZ, CRISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/25/2022
GIBSON, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2021
GONZALES, VERONICAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/16/2024
JURADO, JORGEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/13/2023
KAUFMAN, NICOLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
MANDELBAUM, ELLIOTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
OTAZO, JULIOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/25/2022
PALMER, ROBINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/18/2020
CALDERON, JAVIERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/29/2024
CHARTRAND, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/19/2014
GOMEZ, SEFERINOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/29/2024
KEENEN, LEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/25/2022
CALDERON, LUISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025
DEKOWSKI, DONOVANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
320 LORENALLY DRIVE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
REGENCY IHS REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
BRISENO, MELISSAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
UDEH, DARLINGTONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 5%Other / private 20%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$259per resident / day
operating cost
$7,882per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676083. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next