Lavaca Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
118 Trinity Shores Drive, Port Lavaca, TX 77979 · Government - Hospital district · 130 certified beds · (361) 551-0500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,720 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-03)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.2% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.9% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 38.9–59.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 8.7–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.6–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 93.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to comply with the requirements specified in 42 CFR part 489, subpart I (Advance Directives). The facility was not relieved of its obligation to provide this information to the individual once he or she was able to receive such information. Follow-up procedures must be in place to provide the information to the individual directly at the appropriate time for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) reviewed for Advanced Directives, in that: Resident #1's RP wished to have a DNR code status for Resident #1. Resident #1's OOHDNR was not valid, and Resident #1 was administered CPR by LVN A and RN B on 4/26/20204. This deficient practice could affect residents with an OOH-DNR and could result in residents not getting their Do Not Resuscitate wishes honored. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) began on 4/26/2024 and ended on 4/26/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The findings included: Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: CNA A did not request assistance from a second staff when providing incontinent care and changing bed linens for Resident #1, resulting in the resident falling out of bed on 09/05/2023 and fracturing her right leg. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 9/9/23 at 5:05 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 9/11/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm because of residents' safety. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk for serious injury. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/8/22, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 5 days a week, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nurse staffing. The facility failed to have RN coverage for 5 days on 11/08/2025, 11/22/2025, 11/27/2025, 11/30/2025, and 01/31/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of harm by denying residents the advanced critical thinking skills a registered nurse could provide.The findings included: Review of the facility's RN timecards from 10/01/2025 through 03/23/2026, revealed there were no RN hours for 11/08/2025, and 11/30/2025. The review of the RN timecards revealed there were less than eight hours for RN coverage on Saturday,11/22/2025, 11/27/2025, and 01/31/2026. Review of the facility census dated 11/08/2025 documented a population of 96 residents. The census dated 11/22/2025 documented a population of 94 residents. The census dated 11/27/2025 documented a population of 96 residents. The census dated 1/30/2025 documented a population of 95 residents, and the census dated 01/31/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 12 residents (Residents #12, #13, and #65) who were reviewed for resident assessments. 1. The facility failed to document Resident #13's use of anxiolytic and hypoglycemic medications on the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment. 2. The facility failed to document Resident #65's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder as an active diagnosis on the resident's MDS. 3.The facility failed to document Resident #12's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder as an active diagnosis on the resident's MDS These failures could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care or of not receiving services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #13's admission sheet dated 12/28/23 documented a [AGE] year-old male resident with diagnoses including dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for resident rights. CNA F referred to Resident #14 as honey and sweetie during catheter/incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of loss of dignity and self-worth.The findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 3/26/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mixed receptive-expressive language disorder, aphasia following cerebrovascular disease, dysphagia, and depression. Record review of Resident #14's most recent comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident's speech clarity was clear, was sometimes understood - ability was limited to making concrete requests, and responded adequately to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #82), reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #82 did not have scissors and nail clippers in her room. This failure could place the resident at risk of injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health.The findings include: Record review of Resident #82's face sheet dated 03/25/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with an original admission date of 06/11/2025, with diagnoses that include anxiety disorder (uncontrollable worry about everyday issues, affecting everyday functioning), major depressive disorder recurrent, mild (persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and various emotional and physical problems), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #82's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 out of 15 indicating no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of four medication carts (400/right side 600 nurse medication cart) observed for drug storage and labeling. 1.The facility failed to ensure all insulin pens located inside the 400/right side 600 nurse medication cart were properly labeled with opened dates.2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 did not have a bottle of allergy medications at the bedside. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate treatments and medication misuse.The findings included: 1.During an observation on 3/26/26 at 2:33 PM of the 400/right side 600 nurse medication cart, an undated insulin pen was observed lying in the top drawer of the cart with no opened date written anywhere on the pen itself or on the label on the pen. During an interview with LVN E on 3/26/26 at 2:33 PM, LVN E stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's skin assessments dated 11/13/2025 and 11/25/2025 accurately reflected a bruise on his knee or the bruise on his cheek. The facility failed to accurately document skin issues on Resident #1 according to his care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate care due to an inaccurate skin assessment. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/25/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental function), heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic progressive lung disease), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high blood sugar), major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and misappropriation for 2 of 24 residents (Resident #31 and #64) reviewed for misappropriation. The facility did not conduct training after an allegation of misappropriation of $20 involving Resident #31 on 11/22/24. The facility did not conduct training after an allegation of misappropriation involving the missing of two NARCO pills for Resident # 64 on 11/27/24. This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation, a diminished quality of life, and psychosocial harm. The findings were: Record review of facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, dated Revised 2021 read: .Provide staff orientation and training/orientation programs that includes topics such as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse . [ANE policy given to surveyor did not fully address the 7 elements to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #23 and #74) reviewed for incontinence care. 1. CNA Y wiped in the wrong direction and did not complete care when providing incontinent care to Resident #23. 2. When CNA-L and CNA-M were providing incontinent and indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #74 on 12/18/24, CNA-L did not clean the resident's genital area. These failures could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 12/18/24 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 5 days of 30 days for November 2024 (11/10/24, 11/16/24, 11/18/24, 11/23/24, and 11/30/24) upon review for nursing services. The facility had less than 8 hours a day of RN coverage for 11/10/24, 11/16/24, 11/18/24, 11/23/24, and 11/30/24 for a total of 5 days from November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024. This failure could result in residents not receiving the required services to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of the facility timesheets revealed less than 8 hours a day of RN coverage for 11/10/24 (6.23 hours), 11/16/24 (5 hours), 11/18/24 (6.23 hours), 11/23/24 (6.23 hours), and 11/30/24 (5.5 hours). During an interview on 12/17/24 at 5:15 PM with the VP of Clinical, the VP of Clinical stated their nurses began to enter the facility on a consulting basis the first week of December 2024. The VP of Clinical stated the current acting ADON began serving as the acting ADON on 12/03/24, and that the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for five (5) (Resident #23, #25, #73, #74, and #78) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. 1. The facility failed to obtain a consent for Resident #23 to reside in the secure unit. 2. Resident #25 was in the secure unit, but there was no physician order for putting the resident in the secure unit. 3. The facility failed to obtain a consent and a physician's order for Resident #73 to reside in the secure unit. 4. Resident #74 was in the secure unit, but there was no physician order for putting the resident in the secure unit. 5. The facility failed to obtain a consent and a physician's order for Resident #78 to reside in the secure unit. This failure placed facility residents at risk for lack of resident right due to misinformation by incomplete and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide required training on restraints for 5 of 25 (Activity Director, CNA Q, PTA O, CNA N, and the Speech Therapist) staff sampled for licensure and training. The facility failed to ensure that the Activity Director, CNA Q, PTA O, CNA N, and the Speech Therapist had completed their mandatory restraints training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of the facility's training log, undated, showed no evidence of training for restraints for the Activity Director, CNA Q, PTA O, CNA N, and the Speech Therapist. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:55 AM with the Regional HR Manager, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that several sampled employees were missing required federal or state trainings. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 1:30 PM with the acting HR Coordinator, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that the Activity Director, CNA Q, PTA O, CNA N and the Speech Therapist were missing training for restraints. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide required Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program, for 10 of 25 (Housekeeper P, MA R, CNA S, Food Service Director, RN T, LVN U, Speech Therapist, Social Worker, Occupational Therapist, and LVN E) staff sampled for licensure and training. The facility failed to ensure that Housekeeper P, MA R, CNA S, Food Service Director, RN T, LVN U, Speech Therapist, Social Worker, Occupational Therapist, and LVN E had completed their mandatory QAPI training. This failure could place residents at risk of being care for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of the facility's training log, undated, showed no evidence of training for QAPI for Housekeeper P, MA R, CNA S, the Food Service Director, RN T, LVN U, the Speech Therapist, the Social Worker, the Occupational Therapist, and LVN E. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:55 AM with the Regional HR Manager, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide required training on behavioral health for 2 of 25 employees sampled for licensure and training. The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 25 staff reviewed for behavioral health training (RN V and the Physical Therapist) had completed this mandatory training. This failure could place residents at risk of not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. The findings included: Review of the facility's training log showed no evidence of training for behavioral health for RN V and the Physical Therapist. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:55 AM with the Regional HR Manager, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that several sampled employees were missing required federal or state trainings. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 1:30 PM with the acting HR Coordinator, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that 2 of 25 employees sampled for licensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 6 resident units (300 unit) reviewed for dignity. Laundry Aide X walked into several resident rooms in the 300 unit without knocking. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: During an interview on 12/17/24 at 8:17 a.m., Resident #75, who resided on the 300 unit revealed sometimes staff had entered her room without knocking and it bothered her because it was an invasion of privacy. Resident #75 stated, what if they come in and I'm naked or something? Record review of Resident #75's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/18/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision-making skills. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the residents' right to receive mail, for all facility residents: Facility staff did not distribute mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: During a confidential resident group meeting on 12/17/24 at 3:00 p.m., 3 of 10 members of the resident group stated they never received mail on Saturdays because the Receptionist was off on the weekends. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 5:11 p.m., the Receptionist acknowledged she worked as the receptionist Monday through Friday and did not work on the weekends. The Receptionist revealed, during the week she collected the mail from the mailbox and the local post office. The Receptionist revealed, once she collected the mail, it was placed in a small nook labeled Activities behind the receptionist area. The Receptionist revealed, the Activity Director or the Activity Aide would then collect the mail from the small nook and distribute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 1 of 4 staff (CNA-K) reviewed for competencies. The facility failed to ensure CNA-L had competencies to care as evidence by CNA-L did not clean the resident's genital area when CNA-L was providing incontinent and indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #74 on 12/18/2024. This failure could potentially affect residents by placing them for cross contamination and infections due to staff who lack the appropriate skills and competencies to provide minimize infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #74's face sheet, dated 12/19/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of dementia (impairment of brain functions), peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow to the limbs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services {including procedures that assure accurate acqyuiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of residents for one of four carts reviewed for accuracy. 1. Resident #64 had 2 missing hydrocodone (NARCO)tablets that were not documented as given and could not be accounted for during November 27, 2024. These failures could place residents who received medications, including narcotics at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications and experiencing unintended and harmful effects of medications prescribed to others and place the facility at risk for drug diversion. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 64's face sheet, dated 12/18/24 reflected a male age [AGE]. The resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: joint replacement, cancer, and pain. RP was listed as: resident. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for two residents (Residents #34 and #59) of five residents whose medications were reviewed. 1. The facility's Pharmacy Consultant recommended the physician should consider a gradual dose reduction for Resident #34's Mirtazapine for depression on 11/25/2024. However, the facility failed to ensure communicating to the resident's primary care physician regarding the recommendation. 2. The facility's Pharmacy Consultant recommended adding Do Not Crush to Resident #59's medication administration record for the resident's Diltiazem for hypertension (high blood pressure) on 10/22/2024. However, the facility failed to ensure adding the recommendation to the medication administration record. The failures could place residents receiving medications at risk for adverse consequences and could cause a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial condition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured and distributed properly for one of four nurse medication carts (Hall 200 nurse medication cart and Hall 300 medication cart) reviewed for drug storage and use, as evidenced by: 1. The nurse medication cart for the 300-hall contained 5 loose pills. These failures could place residents who received medications, including narcotics at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications and experiencing unintended and harmful effects of medications prescribed to others and place the facility at risk for drug diversion. The findings included: 1. During an observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 9:15 AM of the nurse cart for the 300 hall with LVN F, revealed 5 loose pills in the bottom of the cart drawers that held the blister packs. When asked what could happen if loose pills are left in the cart, LVN F stated anything could happen if the pills were consumed by a resident for whom they were not prescribed. LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #36) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to monitor hospice aide and nursing visit per the hospice plan of care and keep the correct visit log sheet in Resident #36's hospice binder. This failure could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 12/19/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Residents #74) of 18 residents reviewed for infection control. CNA-L touched the new and clean brief with old and dirty gloves while providing incontinent and indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #74 on 12/18/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #74's face sheet, dated 12/19/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (impairment of brain functions), peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow to the limbs), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control), urinary tract infection (bladder infection),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective communications training to 1 of 25 (RN V) staff sampled for licensure and training. The facility failed to ensure that RN V had completed effective communications training. This failure could place residents at risk of being care for by untrained staff. The findings included: Review of the facility's training log, undated, showed no evidence of training for effective communications for RN V. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:55 AM with the Regional HR Manager, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that several sampled employees were missing required federal or state trainings. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 1:30 PM with the acting HR Coordinator, regarding licensure and training, it was noted that RN V was missing training for effective communications. The facility was provided time to locate and verify the missing trainings. During a second interview on 12/18/24 at 3:30 PM with the acting HR Coordinator, verified RN did not receive the effective communications trainings.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete; and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1 ) reviewed for medical records. Resident #1's 2024 POC (an electronic record system) documentation for showers was not accurately documented by CNA's in October and November of 2024. This failure could result in residents not having accurate overall view of their care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated reflected a female age [AGE]. The resident was admitted on [DATE]with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities.), Alzheimer's disease (most common of dementia affecting memory), Crohn's disease(inflammation of the digestive tract), Anxiety and depression(feelings on hopelessness and anxiousness). Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative of the discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand, failed to update the recipients of the notice as soon as practicable once the updated information became available, and failed to send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge, in that: The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP in writing and did not notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman by phone or in writing of Resident #1's discharge due to safety concerns. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility, causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health. Findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 3 of 3 (Resident #56, #74 and #77) residents reviewed for call lights in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #56, #74 and #77's call light was within reach and placed for easy access. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving care or attention needed and falling. The Findings Include: Record review of Resident #56's face sheet, dated 10/26/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Parkinson's Disease (progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement, chiefly affecting middle-aged and elderly people), major depression, recurrent (A mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life.), paranoid schizophrenia (When a person experiences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide services as outlined by the comprehensive care plan to meet professional standards of quality for 3 of 3 (Residents #20, #32 and #48) residents observed for insulin injections in that: LVN E administered 9 Units of Aspart (brand name Novolog) insulin to Resident #20 without priming the flex pen before injection. LVN E administered 7 Units of Lispro insulin to Resident #32 without priming the flex pen before injection. LVN E administered 2 Units of Lispro insulin to Resident #48 without priming the flex pen before injection. This deficient practice could affect residents who received insulin by a flex pen in the facility by not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medication. The Findings included: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 10/27/2023 revealed an admission date of 09/21/2020 with diagnoses which included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure DA was wearing a beard restraint who had facial hair. These failures could place resident who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: Observation and interview on 10/26/2023 at 11:09 a.m. revealed the DA opening cans of diced peaches not wearing a beard restraint with approximately half inch hairs to his chin and hair to the sides of his upper lip. The DA stated he should have been wearing a beard guard. DA then walked over to the Interim DM then returned and stated the Interim DM told him there were none for him to wear. The DA then washed his hands and went back to preparing the diced peaches without wearing a facial hair net. The DA was observed putting diced peaches in souffle dishes. The DA stated during his food handlers training he did remember having been trained the use of hair nets,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 1 (Resident #74) resident observed for physical restraints in that: The facility failed to assess, care plan and obtain a consent for Resident #74 to be in a recliner which prevents rising on her own. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, a decline in physical functioning and injury. The findings included: Record review of Resident #74's face sheet dated 10/26/2023 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (is a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 1 Resident #74) resident who's quarterly MDS was reviewed for accuracy in that: Resident #74's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] incorrectly documented the resident had a restraint. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: Record review of Resident #74's face sheet dated 10/26/2023 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (is a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke (hemiplegia is defined as paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body, whereas hemiparesis is characterized by one sided weakness, but without complete paralysis), depression recurrent (A mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental disorders were evaluated and received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #39) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to identify on Resident #39's PASRR Level l that the resident had a diagnosis of a mental disorder. This deficient practice could affect all residents who had a mental illness and place them at risk for not receiving needed care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #39's admission record revealed Resident #39 has a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) prior to admission to the facility on [DATE]. Record Review of the admission PASRR Level I for Resident #39, dated 09/28/2023, revealed no was the response documented for the question: Is there evidence or an indicator this is an individual that has a Mental Illness?…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for infection control, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #27, the soiled brief came in contact with Resident #27's clean genitals and CNA A did not wash her hands after cleaning the resident and before touching the clean brief. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings include: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 10/26/2023, revealed an admission date of 10/26/2021, with diagnoses which included: Cerebral infarction(Stroke), Chronic kidney disease(gradual loss of kidney function), Diabetes mellitus(high level of sugar in the blood), Hypertension(High blood pressure). Record review of Resident #27's MDS quarterly assessment, dated 08/11/2023, revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 14 residents (R#6) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The facility failed to ensure that R#6 was not subject to financial misappropriation by CNA A from the time period July 6, 2023, to August 8, 2023. CNA A misappropriated checking account funds from R#6 totaling $15,083. This was determined to be Past Non-Compliance from 07/06/23 until 08/08/23, due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the survey. This failure could have the potential to affect the residents in the facility by placing them at risk for misappropriation of resident property. The findings included: Record review of R#'6s face sheet, dated 10/10/23, and EMR (electronic medical record) revealed, the resident was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revised the Comprehensive Care Plan for 1 of 12 residents (R#1 ) reviewed for revision of the Care Plan. R#1's Care Plan was not revised or documented new interventions after the resident was involved in four residents to resident altercations. This failure could denied the interdisciplinary team information on recommended interventions for dealing with resident to resident altercations. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/10/23, and EMR (electronic medical record) revealed, the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: fluid in the lung, emphysema, muscle wasting, dementia, delusional disorders, insomnia, anxiety, depression, and Alzheimer's disease. Resident was a male age [AGE]. RP (responsible party) was listed as: family member. Resident was housed in the secured unit of the facility. Record review of R#1's BIMS score dated 9/14/23 revealed a score of zero (severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 22 residents (R#8) reviewed for drug administration in that: Had this surveyor not intervened, CMA O would have administered R#8 her senna [a medication used to treat constipation] almost 12 hours before its scheduled timeframe. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive medication and place them at risk for not receiving a therapeutic effect. The findings were: Record review of R#8'S face sheet, dated 10/11/23, revealed R#8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery [buildup of fats in the arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle] without angina pectoris [chest pain], contact with and (suspected) exposure to COVID-19, ganglion [a noncancerous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-22 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post daily information that included the facility name, current date total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift and the resident census for 4 days (11/19/2024,11/20/2024,11/21/2024, and 11/22/2024) of 13 days reviewed. The facility did not post the required current nurse staffing information for 11/19/2024,11/20/2024,11/21/2024, and 11/22/2024. This failure could place residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding the total number of hours staff worked and the facility census. Findings included: During an observation on 11/19/2024 at 10:00 am, a document labeled Daily Nurse Staffing Report dated 11/6/2024, was posted in a plastic sheet protector and taped inside a glass cabinet on 100 hall. During an observation on 11/20/2024 at 11:30 am, a document labeled Daily Nurse Staffing Report dated 11/6/2024, was posted in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,720 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-05-03
- $12,893 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/27/2025 |
| CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| REG LEASED OPCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| WELLSENTIAL OF LAVACA BAY LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/27/2025 |
| DWD TX HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/27/2025 |
| REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| BAIRD, DANIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| CARVAJAL, ANTONIO | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| CORTESE, DAREN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| GIBSON, PATRICIA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| GONZALES, VERONICA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| KAUFMAN, NICOLE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| MANDELBAUM, ELLIOT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| CLEVENGER, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2020 |
| CHAVANA, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2012 |
| CROWLEY, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| DIERSCHKE, SHELIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| FRANKLIN, DALLAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| MCPHERSON, KAY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| MUTCHLER, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/15/2023 |
| RODRIGUEZ, JESSIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| TUAZON, REYNALDO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| WU, JACK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/1988 |
| CLAPP, BARBARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| DEKOWSKI, DONOVAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| TEEHAN, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| REGENCY IHS REHAB LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
| WRIGHT, JOHN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/16/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676481. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.