Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
3106 Bob Rogers Dr, Eagle Pass, TX 78852 · Non profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (830) 757-8566 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,642 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-11)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.7% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.2% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.09 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 49% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 31.3–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.8–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54 was properly secured in the facility transport van on 08/22/24 and sustained a fall resulting in fractures to the third and fourth left hand fingers and a fracture to the right elbow. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 08/22/204 and ended on 08/24/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. Assessment of Resident #54. Inservice training to all staff related to Abuse and Neglect and Reporting Incidents to MD and RP. Van safety training with 7 van drivers to include proper use of van lift and proper ways to secure residents in wheelchairs. Safe surveys with 48 residents using facility transportation. Termination of Van Driver AL (responsible for the incident) post facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 2 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. CNA E failed to sit down while feeding Resident #1 and Resident #2 during the dinner meal on 6/25/26. This deficient practice could place residents at risk to feelings of poor self-esteem. The findings were:1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 6/27/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified Dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance (severe cognitive decline where the exact type of dementia is not specifically identified, but the severity and behavioral disturbances are clearly documented), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (caused by insufficient intake of protein and calories,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status (that was, a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #5) reviewed for notification of changes. RN F failed to consult with Resident #5's physician when she administered two 100 mg tablets instead of two 50 mg tablets of Senna-Docusate.RN F failed to consult with Resident #5's physician when she was unable to successfully re-inject an IV into Resident #5's hand for the administration of Vancomycin (anti-biotic therapy) for the diagnosis of MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). These deficient practices could affect any resident and could result in a decline of the resident's health status. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 3 of 26 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) in that: The facility failed to ensure the vents were cleaned and rid of excess lent in Resident rooms #203, #213 and #215. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being in an uncomfortable and unsanitary environment.Findings included: Observation on 6/27/26 at 11:35 PM during a tour of the secured unit with ADON D revealed the vents mounted on the ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER], #213 and #215 and 3 of the vents in the dining room had black residue on the outside of the vents. The vents also had built up lint all around the edging of the vents. Interview with ADON D revealed the dirty vents could cause the residents to develop a respiratory infection and get sick.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to and the facility provided prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #3) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to promptly act upon concerns a family member voiced to the ADM and DON on Resident #3's behalf involving her care during her stay in the secured unit. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being made aware of any corrective actions taken by the facility leading to frustration. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 6/27/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease with late onset (developing after age [AGE] and characterized by progressive memory loss and cognitive decline) and Dementia in other Diseases classified elsewhere, severe, with other behavioral disturbance (severe cognitive decline where the exact type of dementia is not specifically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL's. Nursing staff failed to change Resident #1's shirt which was covered with skin flakes all over his chest area. This deficient practice could place residents at risk to feelings of dissatisfaction or poor self-esteem. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 4/27/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified Dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance (serious cognitive disorder marked by profound memory loss and significant behavioral changes), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (condition caused by insufficient intake or absorption of protein and calories, leading to impaired body function and tissue loss) and adult failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 (Resident #4) reviewed for accidents and hazards. Nursing staff failed to ensure they cleaned up a puddle of water on the floor underneath Resident #4's chair during dinner time. This deficient practice could place residents at risk and of avoidable accidents. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 6/27/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe with other behavioral disturbance (occurs as a manifestation of another underlying disease), Alzheimer's disease with late onset (developing after age [AGE], characterized by progressive memory loss, cognitive decline, and changes in judgment and behavior) and Anxiety Disorder (frequently have intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administrating of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #5) reviewed for pharmacy services. RN F failed to administer the correct milligrams of Senna-Docusate to Resident #5. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of diarrhea and dehydration. The findings were: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare (involves the diagnosis, treatment, and management of conditions related to the bones, joints, and muscles) and driver injured in collision with unspecified motor vehicles in traffic accident, subsequent encounter. Resident #5 was discharged from the facility on 2/14/26. Record review of Resident #5's physician's order summary report with active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #5) reviewed for complete and accurate records. Nursing staff failed to complete a medication error report when RN F administered two 100 mg. versus two 50 mg tablets of Senna-Docusate to Resident #5 and failed to complete an SBAR when she was unable to successfully inject an IV into the back of Resident #5's right hand for the administration of Vancomycin (anti-biotic therapy) for the diagnosis of MRSA. ADON D failed to document a progress note reflecting he notified Resident #5 when an allergy medication was changed from scheduled to PRN administration. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for not having an accurate account of prescribed medications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed she was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 1 dining room in that: The facility failed to ensure the vents were cleaned and rid of excess lent in the dining room in the secured unit. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for feeling uncomfortable and lead to cross contamination. Findings included: Observation on 6/24/26 at 5PM in the secured unit revealed residents were walking around the hallway, and some residents were sitting in the dining room. Observation on 6/27/26 at 11:35 PM during a tour of the secured unit with ADON D revealed 3 of the vents in the dining room had black residue on the outside of the vents. The vents also had built up lint all around the edging of the vents. Interview with ADON D revealed the dirty vents could cause the residents to develop a respiratory infection and get sick. ADON D stated he understood the MS cleaned the vents on a schedule according to the maintenance application he used but did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. 1. The facility failed to maintain the temperature for puree bread at 135 F or above. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, poor quality of life and food borne illness. The findings included:During an observation on 12/11/2025 at 11:45 a.m., the cook took the temperature of the bread puree on serving line which reached 116 degrees.During an interview on 12/11/2025 at 11:49 a.m., COOK G stated the holding temperature for hot items should be 145 degrees or above. [NAME] G stated they can reheat the item in the microwave if they do not meet holding temperatures. [NAME] G stated the lower temperature could have an increased risk of bacteria in the food. During an interview on 12/11/2025 at 11:53 a.m., the DM stated the holding temperature for hot items should be 135 and above for regulation and safety. The DM stated they can reheat the item in the oven or microwave if foods are not meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food storage safety. 1.The kitchen had an unsealed cheese bag dated 12/4/2025 in the fridge,2.The kitchen had an unsealed cilantro bag dated 12/5/2025 in the fridge.3.The kitchen had an unsealed pizza dough bag dated 10/26/2025 in the freezer.4.The kitchen had an undated macaroni container in the pantry5.The kitchen had a tomato that appeared to be spoiled in the fridge. This deficient practice could place residents who eat food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.The findings include:During an observation on 12/09/2025 at 10:46 a.m. of kitchen refrigerator, the following items were unsealed: cheese bag date 12/04/20205, cilantro bag dated 12/05/2025. Observation of the kitchen refrigerator noted a spoiled tomato. During an observation on 12/09/2025 at 10:46 a.m. of kitchen freezer a pizza dough bag dated 10/26/2025 was observed unsealed. During observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident # 1 ) reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #1 's face sheet dated 12/9/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 11/19/25.Resident # 1 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, [is a chronic metabolic condition marked by high blood sugar levels], Dependence on renal dialysis [means your kidneys have failed requiring a machine to filter waste, extra fluid, and balance minerals in your blood for survival], and Myopathy[is a broad term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for PASARR accuracy.1. The MDS Case Manager did not refer Resident #68 for a level II resident review upon newly evident serious mental health disorder.This deficient practice could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services.The findings included:Record review of Resident #68's face sheet, dated 12/10/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis type 2 diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (condition caused by the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel). Record review of Resident #68's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident's BIMS score a 4 out of 15 which suggested the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 resident (Resident # 83) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #83's care plan included Contact Isolation which was ordered to prevent spread of her infection C-diff and EBP for her infected wound which required treatment and a dressing. Resident #83's comprehensive person-centered care plan did not reflect the use of PPE as an intervention. This deficient practice affects residents with contagious infections and could result in increased transmission of the bacteria. The findings included: Record review of Resident #83's electronic face sheet dated 12/10/2025 reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (Resident #30) of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Resident #30's oxygen concentrator left side black foam filter was gray from being covered with air particles and dust. This deficient practice affects residents who receive oxygen therapy and could result in hypoxia (low oxygen) and difficulty breathing.The findings included: Record review of Resident #30's electronic face sheet dated 12/10/2025 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: epilepsy (chronological neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures), anoxic brain damage (damage to the brain due to a lack of oxygen), respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the body does not receive enough oxygen leading…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 (refrigerators in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-B) of 5 residents' refrigerators reviewed in that: The personal refrigerator in resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] B contained unlabeled, undated food items. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which could be spoiled. The findings were: Observation on 12/10/2025 at 9:05 a.m. revealed that the personal refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-B contained an ice-cream pint, opened, with an expiration date of 03/15/26, which was unlabeled and undated. Observation on 12/11/2025 at 08:50 a.m. revealed the personal refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-B contained an ice-cream pint, opened, with an expiration date of 3/15/2026, which was unlabeled and undated. Further observation on 12/11/2025 at 12:54 p.m. revealed that the ice cream was still present in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 residents (Resident #36 and #83) who were reviewed for infection control. The findings included: 1. The facility failed to post a sign which indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for Resident #36 who had an open wound with treatment. 2. The facility failed to post signs on Resident #83's door that indicated she was on contact isolation for C-Diff. and required EBP for having an open wound which required a dressing. This deficient practice affects residents with infections and wounds and could result in increased transmission or cross contamination. The findings include: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 12/10/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access, for 1 of 6 medication carts (300-hall medication cart), reviewed for security. LVN B left the 300-hall medication cart unattended and unlocked. This failure could place residents at risk for having their medications uncontrolled. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 9/17/2025 11:28 AM revealed the 300-hall nurse cart was stationed at the end of the 300-hall and was unattended and unlocked. LVN A locked the cart and stated the cart was assigned to LVN B. During an interview on 9/17/2025 at 11:32 AM LVN B stated she had left the 300-hall medication cart unattended and unlocked while she stored a bottle of enteral feeding formula in the facility's resident pantry. LVN B stated she could not visualize the 300-hall medication cart from within the resident pantry. During an interview on 9/17/2025 at 11:45 AM the Administrator and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 1 residents pantry refrigerators reviewed for food safety. The facility stored resident's foods in the Resident's pantry refrigerator without labels and dates to indicate if the foods were safe to serve. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.The findings included:During an observation and interview on 9/17/2025 at 11:34 AM revealed the facility's Resident's Pantry room had a refrigerator. The refrigerator presented with signage which read, Resident Food Storage . food should have a name, room number, and a date when placed into storage . refrigerator will be checked daily and disposed of not labeled food . LVN B stated the refrigerator had unlabeled containers of food which included berries, various desserts stored in small foam containers, 1 - 1/2 sandwich, and 1 cookie, which all did not have and labeling to reveal if the foods were safe to serve. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure three packets of bread, observed in the freezer on 09/08/2024, were labeled and dated, and that one of packets was not opened in the freezer because the plastic bag was torn. This failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 09/08/2024 at 9:59 a.m. in the kitchen revealed there was one freezer in the dry storage room, and inside the freezer there were three packets of bread. Two packets were covered in plastic bags but not labeled and dated. The other packet was French toasted bread, covered in a plastic bag, but the packet was opened because the plastic bag was torn. The packet of French toasted bread was also not labeled and dated. Interview on 09/08/2024 at 10:01 a.m., Kitchen Supervisor-N saw the three packets of bread inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #83 and #63) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA AD used the proper technique to sanitize her hands while providing incontinent care for Resident #83. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA-AD and CNA-AE wore a gown while performing incontinent care for Resident #63 who was on EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) on 09/10/2024. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #83's face sheet, dated 09/10/2024, revealed an admission date of 01/17/2024 and, a readmission date of 06/21/2024 with diagnoses which included: Dementia (decline in cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA AD and CNA AE completely closed Resident #17's privacy curtain while providing incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings include: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 09/10/2024, revealed an admission date of 07/01/2022 and, a readmission date of 01/06/2023, with diagnoses which included: Dementia (decline in cognitive abilities), Major depressive disorder (mental disorder characterized by at least two weeks of pervasive low mood, low self-esteem, and loss of interest or pleasure), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function)and, Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood). Record review of Resident #17's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/07/2024, revealed the resident had a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 18 residents (Residents #40 and #9) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], correctly documented the resident as receiving an anticoagulant medication. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's, who was a smoker, annual MDS, dated [DATE], did not reflect the resident did not use tobacco. These failures could place residents at-risk for inadequate care and services. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 09/10/2024, revealed an admission date of 03/09/2018 and, a readmission date of 05/12/2024 with diagnoses that included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Heart failure (impairment in the heart's ability to fill with and pump blood), Major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for level II resident review for 1 (Resident #68) of 18 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to refer Resident #68 for re-evaluation of PASARR level I review following a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, added on 01/05/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their mental health needs met by the facility and could place all residents at risk of harm by mentally unstable residents. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #68's face sheet, dated 09/10/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and an admission date of 11/08/2021 with diagnoses that included: cirrhosis of liver (scar tissue replaces healthy liver tissue), hypertension (high blood pressure), atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup in artery walls), and schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type (chronic mental illness that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #17, who was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, had a care plan regarding bowel incontinence care. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services. The findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 09/11/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female and an original admission date of 07/01/2022 and re-admission date of 01/16/2023 with diagnoses that included: Dementia (decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #79) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #79, who was receiving Glucerna at a rate of 55 ml/hour via tube feeding on 09/08/2024, coincided with the physician order that indicated providing Glucerna at a rate of 60 ml/hour to the resident. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper tube feeding requirements prescribed by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #79's face sheet, dated 09/08/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female and an original admission date of 06/05/2023 and re-admission date of 12/23/2023 with diagnoses that included: Dementia (decline in cognitive ability), surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, dysphagia (swallowing difficulties),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #63) reviewed for quality of care in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #63's nebulizing mask and tubing, that were observed on 09/08/2024, were not covered in a plastic bag dated on 07/21/2024. This failure could affect residents who received nebulizing treatment and place them at risk for respiratory infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #63's face sheet, dated 09/09/2024, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female and an original admission date of 07/02/2021 and re-admission date of 02/15/2022 with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease (damages memory and thinking skills), hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle wasting and atrophy (muscles to decrease in size and strength), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), and cardiac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to formulate an advance directive and determine the choice to receive or not receive CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for advanced directives in that: Resident #6 did not have advance directives documented in the admission agreement or electronic medical record from the date of admission, [DATE], to discharge date , [DATE]. This deficient practice could affect residents admit to the facility and place them at risk of not having their wishes known, which could delay emergency treatment. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's face sheet dated revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #6's consolidated orders for [DATE] revealed resident had an order for Full Code status, initiated [DATE]. Review of Resident #6's admission care plan, initiated [DATE], revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, on 5 days during the look back period from April 1, 2023, to August 8, 2023 (99 calendar days). The facility failed to maintain RN coverage on: April 1,2023, April 2, 2023, April 5, 2023, May 12, 2023, and May 13, 2023. This failure could affect all 82 residents of the facility by placing them at risk for not having their nursing and medical needs met. Findings included: Review of the 'Timecard Review (Department Report)' for all of the facility's RNs from 04/01/2023 - 08/08/2023 revealed there was no RN coverage on the following dates: April 1, 2023 April 2, 2023 April 5, 2023 May 12, 2023 May 13, 2023 During an interview on 08/11/2023 at 8:38 a.m. the Interim Administrator stated, I began my employment at this facility on July 13, 2023, I was not here on any of the days reported as not having the required RN coverage, I did check with the Regional Nursing Consultant to make sure she was not in the building and she was not. I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The Activity Director was not currently qualified to direct the activities program. This failure could result in not meeting the assessed activity needs of each resident. The findings were: Review of the staff roster on 08/11/2022 revealed the current Activity Directors hire date was 09/25/2015. Interview on 08/11/2023 at 03:25 p.m. with the Activity Director revealed the Activity Director had been in the current position since January 2022, stating I was the Activity Assistant before, when the Activity Director left I took over the position. The Activity Director stated, I am not a certified Activity Director, I haven't had any classes, they haven't ever told me that I need a certificate or anything, I do good at my job, and I don't think I need any training . The Activity Director further stated, if I need help I just as the Regional Nurse. Interview on 08/11/2023 at 03:29 p.m. the Interim Administrator stated, the facility does not have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for dialysis in that: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Resident #44. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 8/11/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] and 7/17/23 with diagnoses that included hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol), cognitive communication deficit, end stage renal disease (condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis) and dependence on renal dialysis. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents have the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 9 resident (Resident # 73) reviewed for advanced directive in that: The facility failed to have the physician's signature recorded on the Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOHDNR), which made the advanced directive invalid. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their wishes known, which could affect whether they receive emergency medical treatment. Findings: Record review of Resident #73 face sheet, dated 08/10/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to the following: cerebral infarction (stroke) due to unspecified to occlusion or stenosis of right middle cerebral artery, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), pneumonia, dysphagia following a cerebral infarction, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 or 2 residents (#73). Resident #73's oxygens was administered at 2 Liters Per Minutes instead of 1 Liter Per Minute via nasal cannula as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could affect 2 residents who received oxygen continuously and result in residents receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and could result in decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #73 face sheet, dated 08/10/2023, revealed the resident was admitted the facility on 06/29/2023 with diagnoses that included but not limited to the following: cerebral infarction due to unspecified to occlusion or stenosis of right middle cerebral artery, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), pneumonia, dysphagia following a cerebral infarction, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, and aphasia (loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #55 and #64) reviewed for infection control practices, in that: During the medication pass, LVN B: -placed clean gloves in her pocket -did not perform hand hygiene prior to care and between glove changes -did not sanitize the digital wrist blood pressure cuff between resident use These failures could place residents at risk for infection, transmission for communicable diseases and/or a decline in health. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident # 55's face sheet, dated 8/11/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting or thinning of muscle mass), hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,642 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAL VERDE COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/28/2015 |
| REGENCY IHS OF MAVERICK, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| DWD TX HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REG BRIDGE OPCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REG HG OPCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| BAIRD, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 04/13/2021 |
| CARVAJAL, ANTONIO | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/16/2024 |
| CHARTRAND, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/19/2014 |
| CLAPP, BARBARA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| CORTESE, DAREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/10/2021 |
| DIAZ, CRIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/25/2020 |
| GIBSON, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/01/2021 |
| GONZALES, VERONICA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/16/2024 |
| JURADO, JORGE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/13/2023 |
| KAUFMAN, NICOLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/10/2021 |
| KEENEN, LEE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/25/2022 |
| MANDELBAUM, ELLIOT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| OTAZO, JULIO | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/25/2022 |
| PALMER, ROBIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 11/18/2020 |
| DEKOWSKI, DONOVAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| PEREZ, ARMANDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2023 |
| 3106 BOB ROGERS DRIVE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| REGENCY IHS REHAB LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2015 |
| DE LOS SANTOS, RUBEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/06/2013 |
| MORENO, ESTIBALIZ | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676133. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.