Guadalupe Valley Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
1210 Eastwood Dr, Seguin, TX 78155 · Non profit - Corporation · 148 certified beds · (830) 379-9308 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $75,450 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.2% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.6% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.5% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.41 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.45 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.5%CMS range 36.7–59.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.2–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 68.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.1–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 124.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, notify a resident's representative when there was an accident involving the resident when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility failed to promptly notify Resident #1's physician and Resident #1's responsible party when Resident #1 exhibited right-sided facial drooping and edema and coolness to both hands on 4/20/24. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 4/24/24 at 5:23 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 4/26/24 the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential harm with a scope identified as isolated until interventions were put in place to ensure prompt notification of a resident's physician and responsible party. This deficient practice could place residents at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes in that: On 4/20/24, upon the first onset of Resident #1 's symptoms, LVN A failed to recognize significant change of condition until the Resident #1's RP voiced concerns on 4/21/24. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 4/24/24 at 5:23 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 4/26/24 the facility remained out of compliance at a level of potential harm with a scope identified as isolated until interventions were put in place to ensure prompt notification of a resident's physician and responsible party. This deficient practice could affect residents with a change in condition and place them at risk of a delay in medical intervention and decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 4/23/24, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed gloves during incontinent care for Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infections.The findings include: Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet dated 06/30/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: cerebral infarction (blood vessel supplying the brain becomes blocked, resulting in lack of oxygen) and chronic kidney disease, stage 3A (moderate kidney damage). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that others could understand her and she could understand others. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who had the right to reside received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 residents (Residents #6, #14 and #44) of 32 residents reviewed. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's call light was within reach. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's call light was within reach. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's call light was within reach. This facility failure could place residents at risk of not having a way to call for help or assistance when needed.The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #6's electronic face sheet dated 03/25/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior), dementia (syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen.The facility failed to ensure all open items being stored in the walk-in refrigerator were labeled and dated with the use by date.The facility failed to ensure all open items being stored in the reach-in cooler were labeled and dated with the use by dateThe facility failed to take the temperatures of all foods served to residents. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings include:Observation of the facility's kitchen reach-in cooler on 03/24/2026 at 9:11 AM revealed one open half gallon of chocolate milk open with no open date. The kitchen's service line had a container with greater than 10 individually portioned slices of bread in bags without labels or dates. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 03/26/2026 at 11:20 AM revealed dietary aide B opened 5 cans of individual portions of soup and poured them into 5 separate bowls then placed plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 10 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and 1 of 3 shower rooms (#600 hall).The facility failed to ensure the vent that had excessive dust collected in the return vent in room [ROOM NUMBER] was cleaned.The facility failed to ensure a shower room on #600 hall was cleaned after use of a shower chair with feces, a bag with soiled towels, and a bag with a soiled brief.These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory illness and the spread infections and or diseases.The findings included: During observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/24/2026 at 11:14 AM the return vent in the ceiling was covered with thick dust. Observation and interview on 3/24/2026 at 11:34AM the shower room on the #600 hall there was a bag with soiled towels and a bag with garbage. There was one shower chair sitting in the shower stall with stool on the seat.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status of the residents for 2 of 32 residents (Residents #4 and #107) reviewed for resident assessments. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's therapeutic diet was accurately reflected on her Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #107's Bipap was accurately reflected on her quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of missed or inaccurate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 03/27/2026, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/20/2026 Section K0520 Nutritional Approaches: D. Therapeutic diet (e.g., low salt, diabetic, low cholesterol) not coded While…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 32 residents ( residents #14 and #107) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #14's fall interventions. 2.The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #107's indwelling urinary catheter leg strap. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the type of care required and result in unmet needs. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #14's electronic face sheet dated 03/25/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Huntington's disease (genetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent with bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 resident of 2 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #107 had a leg strap to secure her indwelling urinary catheter tubing. This deficient practice could place residents' risk of complications and infection from movement at the insertion site. The findings included: Record review of Resident #107's electronic face sheet dated 03/25/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on 11/102020. Her diagnosis was: contracture of muscles, left and right lower legs (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff). Record review of Resident #107's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that she understood and was able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 77) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility failed to replace or clean dirty and dusty oxygen filters in Resident #77's oxygen concentrator. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of respiratory infection and difficulty breathing. The findings included: Record review of Resident #77's electronic face sheet dated 03/27/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that happens when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen in the blood)and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans, in that. The facility failed to update Resident #1's care plan to reflect Resident #1 was attempting to eat non-food items. This failure could affect residents who have care areas not addressed by the care plans by not having their needs met and putting them at risk of not receiving appropriate care.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 02/21/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and were systematically organized, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for consents for accurate medical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure that there was a doctor order on 01/21/2026 in Resident #1's electronic medical record to reflect that 1 enema (a procedure in which liquid or gas is injected into the rectum, typically to expel its contents) was given to Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure the bathing documentation for Resident #1, accessed on 02/22/2026, was complete and included Resident #1 had a bed bath on 02/17/2026, resident refused on 02/16/2026, and bathing was not applicable on 02/13/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for inaccurate medical records.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 02/21/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled substances was maintained and periodically reconciled for 8 of 17 residents (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #11) and 4 of 6 medication carts (MC #1, MC #2, MC #4 and MC #6) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. 1. The facility failed to ensure discontinued/expired medications were removed from the medication carts on (4) occasions.2. The facility failed to ensure the administration and count of controlled substances were reconciled on (3) occasions.3. The facility failed to ensure counts of controlled medications were completed/signed for on (28) occasions. These deficient practices could put residents at risk for diversion and reduced effectiveness of medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated 9/26/25, revealed the resident was re-admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent or greater for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #12). The facility had a medication error rate of 45% based on 5 errors out of 11 opportunities. LVN D failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #12 by administering Gabapentin (for neuropathy), Cyclobenzaprine (for pain), Colace (for constipation), Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium ophthalmic gel (dry eyes), and Rosuvastatin (for high cholesterol) 2 hours and 12 minutes before the scheduled time. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of their medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's admission Record, dated 9/26/25, revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dry Eye Syndrome, Constipation, Hemiparesis (weakness or an inability to move one side of the body), Hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness to one side of the body) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for medication labeling. The facility failed to ensure medications were correctly labeled. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's admission Record, dated 9/26/25, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). Record review of Resident #11's Order Summary Report, dated 9/26/25, revealed: Lorazepam oral concentrate 2mg/mL by mouth every 4 hours PRN. Observation on 9/25/25 at 2:15 pm revealed Resident #11's Lorazepam was in the refrigerator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that are complete; and accurately documented for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records:The facility failed to document wound care dressing changes on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #1 on 8/2/25, 8/3/25, 8/5/25, 8/8/25, 8/13/25, 8/14/25, and 8/16/25.These failures could place residents at risk for missed treatments and care which could result in the deterioration of the wound and/or development of an infection.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/7/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/18/25 with diagnoses that included sepsis (condition in which the body's response to infection causes widespread inflammation, leading to tissue damage, organ failure, or death), secondary malignant neoplasm of right lung (cancer has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to notify Resident #1's provider of his change in condition when the Wound Care Nurse identified the resident developed a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on 8/6/25.This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in medical treatment, decline in health, and death.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/7/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/18/25 with diagnoses that included sepsis (condition in which the body's response to infection causes widespread inflammation, leading to tissue damage, organ failure, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans:The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that addressed Resident #1's pressure wound, refusals for offloading and repositioning and wound care treatments.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs and preferences met.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/7/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/18/25 with diagnoses that included sepsis (condition in which the body's response to infection causes widespread inflammation, leading to tissue damage, organ failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2), in the facility reviewed for accidents, in that:The facility failed to ensure Resident # 2 did not have disposable razors in his room.This failure could place residents at risk of injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health.The findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 10/07/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, other sequelae following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (lingering affects due to a disruption in blood flow to the brain), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (frequent acid reflux), and long term us of insulin.Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS of 14 out of 15 indicating independent decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 nurse (Wound Care Nurse) reviewed for competent nursing care.The facility failed to ensure the Wound Care Nurse was aware of notification of changes to the RN Unit Manager or designee per facility policy when she identified Resident #1 with a Stage 2 pressure ulcer.These deficient practices affect residents who depend on nursing care and could place residents at risk for injury, infection and a decline in health. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/7/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 8/18/25 with diagnoses that included sepsis (condition in which the body's response to infection causes widespread inflammation, leading…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #12) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN D followed proper infection control practices during medication administration on 9/26/25. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for exposure to pathogens causing infection resulting in diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's admission Record, dated 9/26/25, revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dry Eye Syndrome, Constipation, Hemiparesis (weakness or an inability to move one side of the body), Hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness to one side of the body) and Hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol). Record review of Resident #12's Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for privacy, in that: CNA A and CNA B did not close Resident #6's privacy curtain while providing incontinent care on 06/05/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 06/06/2025, revealed an admission date of 06/03/2023 and, a readmission date of 04/10/2024, with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain.), Anxiety (A group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry), Chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #6, CNA A did not change her gloves or wash her hands after cleaning the resident and before touching the clean draw sheet and clean brief on 06/05/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 06/06/2025, revealed an admission date of 06/03/2023 and, a readmission date of 04/10/2024, with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Vascular dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 1 shower room (300 hall) and 5 of 5 resident rooms (#312, #314, #315, #316 and #506) whose rooms were observed for housekeeping services. 1. Nursing staff failed to clean and sanitize the 300-hall shower room after each resident shower. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident Rooms #312, #314, #315, #316 and #506 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. These deficient practices could place any residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment and result in feelings of dissatisfaction. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident Council Meetings from July 2024 to [DATE] revealed concerns about CNA's not cleaning the 300-hall shower, leaving towels and other linens on the floor and sometimes poop. Interview on 1/14/25 at 10:11 AM during a group meeting with 12 residents including Resident #24, Resident #85 and Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 1 of 4 shower rooms (300-hall shower room) and in 2 of 2 Resident rooms (#308 and #516) observed for safety hazards. 1. Nursing staff failed to ensure razors were disposed of after used in the 300-hall shower room and to ensure an oxygen tank was returned to a resident room. 2. Nursing staff failed to ensure a razor was secured and not left in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. Nursing staff failed to ensure multiple sharp devices/scissors were secured and not left in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. These deficient practices could affect resident who had access to sharps materials and could result in an avoidable accident. The findings were: 1. Observation and interview on 1/14/25 at 11:25 AM in the 300-hall shower room revealed a razor on top of a shower chair and an oxygen cylinder in a stand sitting in the middle of the shower room. CNA J stated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and handle, store, process, and transport linens to prevent the spread of infection for 2 of 5 resident halls (300-hall & 500-hall) and in 2 of 2 resident rooms (#308 and #506) reviewed for infection control. 1. A dirty linen barrel on 500-hall had dirty linen spilling over the edges and the lid was sitting approximately 2.5 inches above the barrel on top of the dirty linen. 2. Dirty towels with feces were left on the floor in the shower stall and there was a lump of feces on the floor in the 300-hall shower room. 3. There were drops of blood by bed B in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. There were drops of blood on the floor by bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a soiled dressing with blood on the floor, a clean bag of linens stacked on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 8 (Food Service Manager, Cook, Housekeeper, Maintenance Assistant, CNA B, CNA C, CNA D, and CNA E) of 29 employees reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to Food Service Manager, Cook, Housekeeper, Maintenance Assistant, CNA B, CNA C, CNA D, and CNA E annually. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings include: Record review of the personnel records for the Food Service Manager revealed a hire date of 10/23/2021. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of resident rights training being provided annually. Record review of the personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training, resident rights training, abuse/neglect training,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on communications training for 3 of 29 employees (Cook, CNA B, and CNA D) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to Cook, CNA B, and CNA D annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of the personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training. Record review of the personnel records for CNA B revealed a hire date of 03/08/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training. Record review of the personnel records for CNA D revealed a hire date of 07/24/2017. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training. Interview with the HR Director, on 01/16/2025 at 12:05 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on rights of the resident training for 4 of 29 employees (Food Service Manager, Cook, CNA B and CNA D) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective rights of the resident training was provided to Food Service Manager, Cook, CNA B and CNA D annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of the personnel records for the Food Service Manager revealed a hire date of 10/23/2021. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of resident rights training being provided annually. Record review of the personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of resident rights training. Record review of the personnel records for CNA B revealed a hire date of 03/08/2022. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include as part of its QAPI program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of it's QAPI program for 4 (Cook, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E) of 29 employees reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to Cook, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E annually. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings include: Record review of personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training, resident rights training, abuse/neglect training, dementia training, QAPI training, infection control training, ethics training, behavior health training, HIV training, fall prevention training, restraint training, or emergency preparedness training being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for CNA C revealed a hire date of 06/01/2021. Further review of a training log,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program training for 3 of 29 employees (Cook, CNA B and CNA D) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program training was provided Cook, CNA B and CNA D annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training, resident rights training, abuse/neglect training, dementia training, QAPI training, infection control training, ethics training, behavior health training, HIV training, fall prevention training, restraint training, or emergency preparedness training being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for CNA B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on behavioral health for 3 of 29 employees (Cook, Maintenance Assistant, CNA C) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective behavioral health training was provided Cook, Maintenance Assistant, and CNA C annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training, resident rights training, abuse/neglect training, dementia training, QAPI training, infection control training, ethics training, behavior health training, HIV training, fall prevention training, restraint training, or emergency preparedness training being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for the Maintenance Assistant revealed a hire date of 04/25/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #8) who was observed for call light placement. The facility staff failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #8. This failure could affect any resident and keep them from calling for help as needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 01/14/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Record review of Resident #8's Annual MDS assessment, dated 10/18/2024, revealed the resident's BIMS score was 09, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Annual MDS assessment further revealed Resident #8 was dependent (helper does all of the effort) with rolling left and right, chair/bed to chair transfer, tub/shower transfer, toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, upper body dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including but not limited to choose health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #184) who was reviewed for services. The facility failed to meet and discuss with Resident #184, a new admission, Medicaid coverage and options for healthcare providers. This deficient practice could affect any resident who was a new admission to the facility and could result in residents not having the opportunity to participate in making decisions for health coverage and choosing health providers. The findings were: Review of Resident #184's face sheet, dated 1/16/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side, Other Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment significantly or to commence a new form of treatment for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #24) whose records were reviewed for medications. Nursing staff failed to contact Resident #24's PCP/NP on 1/14/25 when realizing medication insulin Toujeo was not available for night administration per physician orders. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to resident's not receiving medications per physician orders and result in a decline in condition. The findings were: Review of Resident #24's face sheet, dated 1/16/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (According to Mayo clinic Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose)) with Diabetic chronic kidney disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (According to Mayo…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #24) whose records were reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN G failed to notify LVN H, the ADON or the DON that Resident #24's insulin medication, Toujeo was not delivered by the facility pharmacy and not available for administration on 1/14/25 to avoid further delay in delivery. Resident #24 did not receive his nighttime dose (80 units) of Toujeo insulin per physician orders. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to resident's not receiving medications per physician orders and result in a decline in condition. The findings were: Review of Resident #24's face sheet, dated 1/16/25, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (According to Mayo clinic Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose)) with Diabetic chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training for 2 of 29 employees (Cook, CNA D) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to [NAME] and CNA D annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training, resident rights training, abuse/neglect training, dementia training, QAPI training, infection control training, ethics training, behavior health training, HIV training, fall prevention training, restraint training, or emergency preparedness training being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for CNA D revealed a hire date of 07/24/2017. Further review of a training log, provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0946 — isolatedProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on ethics training for 1 of 29 employees (Cook) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective ethics training was provided [NAME] annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for the [NAME] revealed a hire date of 11/16/2023. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of communication training, resident rights training, abuse/neglect training, dementia training, QAPI training, infection control training, ethics training, behavior health training, HIV training, fall prevention training, restraint training, or emergency preparedness training being provided annually. Interview with the HR Director, on 01/16/2025 at 12:05 PM revealed annual trainings are available to employees in Health Stream and assigned by corporate. The HR Director stated employees receive emails informing them of assigned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective in-service training for nurse aides on dementia for 1 of 5 nurse aides (CNA C) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective dementia training was provided CNA C annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for CNA C revealed a hire date of 06/01/2021. Further review of a training log, provided by the HR Manager revealed no evidence of dementia training, QAPI training, behavior health training, or emergency preparedness training being provided annually. Interview with the HR Director, on 01/16/2025 at 12:05 PM revealed annual trainings are available to employees in Health Stream and assigned by corporate. The HR Director stated employees receive emails informing them of assigned trainings and it is up to department heads to ensure employees complete trainings in Health Stream. The HR director also stated employees that do not complete their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident's #2) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula was handled by qualified staff. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. Findings included. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/11/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, cough, need for assistance with personal care and morbid obesity due to excess calories. Record review of Resident #2's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/25/24 revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 5 resident rooms (Resident #1), 1 of 5 hallways, 300 hall, and 1 of 1 medication cart. 1. The facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside or on the floor for Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure there were no medications found on the floor and the medication cart on the 300 hall was left unlocked and unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/11/24 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke; occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is interrupted/reduced resulting in lack of oxygen to the brain), pain in right shoulder, pain in right knee, non-displaced fracture of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to personal privacy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dignity. Resident #2's bedroom door was not closed, and the privacy curtain was not completely drawn during catheter care on 8/29/24. This failure could affect residents by contributing to poor self-esteem, decreased self-worth, and quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 8/30/24, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: UTI, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Morbid Obesity (disorder that involves having too much body fat) , Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) , Anxiety Disorder (feeling of dread, fear, or uneasiness) , Major Depressive Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities), Obstructive and Reflux…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided catheter care according to professional standards; keeping the catheter anchored to prevent excessive tension on the catheter, which can lead to trauma due to urethral tears or dislodging the catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for trauma resulting in diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 8/30/24, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: UTI, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Morbid Obesity (disorder that involves having too much body fat) , Hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 2 of 2 staff (CNA B and CNA C) reviewed for nurse aide competencies. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B performed perineal care for Resident #1, on 8/29/24, according to facility policy. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA C performed catheter care for Resident #2, on 8/29/24, according to professional standards. This failure could place residents at risk for trauma and/or infection. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 8/30/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and Hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's vital signs were accurately documented in the EMR on 8/28/24. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 8/30/24, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: UTI, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Morbid Obesity (disorder that involves having too much body fat) , Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) , Anxiety Disorder (feeling of dread, fear, or uneasiness) , Major Depressive Disorder (mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B followed proper infection control practices during perineal care for Resident #1 0n 8/29/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA C followed proper infection control practices during catheter care for Resident #2 on 8/29/24. These failures could place residents at risk for exposure to pathogens causing infection resulting in diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 8/30/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status for 1 (Resident #40) out of 8 residents reviewed for MDS assessments in that: Resident #40's MDS assessment reflected her to be frequently incontinent of bladder when she was always incontinent of bladder. This failure could affect residents who required MDS assessments and result in lack of care. The findings included: Review of Resident #40's electronic face sheet dated 12/14/2023 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: cerebral vascular accident ( an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm. An irregular heart rhythm is called an arrhythmia. AFib can lead to blood clots in the heart. The condition also increases the risk of stroke, heart failure and other heart-related complications) and hemiplegia ( paralysis on one side of the body). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 (Resident #85) of 12 residents observed during dining observations in that: Resident #85 was served a regular consistency diet when he was ordered a pureed. This failure could affect residents with eating and swallowing disorders and result in choking. The findings included: Record review of Resident #85's electronic face sheet dated December 12, 2023 reflected he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids, arising from the throat and esophagus, ranging from mild difficulty to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 25 residents (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) reviewed for infection control in that: LVN A did not perform hand hygiene between passing the lunch meal trays of Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7. This deficient practice could affect all residents and place them at risk for infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 9/8/23, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease [a disorder of the nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors], muscle wasting and atrophy [shrinking of muscle or nerve tissue], not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had evidence that all alleged violations involving abuse were thoroughly investigated, failed to take corrective action and prevent further potential abuse for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: The facility did not conduct an investigation after being informed Resident #2 struck Resident #1 on the back of the head. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse and placed them at risk for continued and/or unrecognized abuse, injury, and emotional distress. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 9/6/23, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease that affects memory and other important mental functions] with late onset, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery [buildup of fats in the arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle] without angina…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: Resident #3's care plan was not updated to reflect the aggressive behavior after he struck Resident #8 on 5/4/23. This deficient practice could affect all residents and place them at risk for not receiving appropriate treatment and services or activities: The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 9/6/23, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia [brain damage typically caused by multiple strokes], moderate, with psychotic disturbance, COVID-19, muscle wasting and atrophy [shrinking of muscle or nerve tissue], not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, unsteadiness of feet, and weakness. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for resident assessments. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's active diagnosis of repeated falls (two or more falls within a 12-month period) was reflected on the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE]. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of missed or inaccurate care.The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet dated 06/30/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: repeated falls, diagnosis date: 05/29/2026 ranked #7 on her list of diagnoses. Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that she could sometimes understand others and be understood by others. Resident #1 was not a candidate for a BIMS which signified her cognitive status was severely impaired. She required moderate assistance with ADLs and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$75,450 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $75,450 — penalty dated 2024-04-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDINA COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/15/2026 |
| BAIRD, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 04/13/2021 |
| CARVAJAL, ANTONIO | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/16/2024 |
| CLAPP, BARBARA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| CORTESE, DAREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/10/2021 |
| FROSCH, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2010 |
| GIBSON, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/01/2021 |
| GONZALES, VERONICA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/16/2024 |
| HARDT, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/27/2020 |
| KAUFMAN, NICOLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 08/10/2021 |
| MANDELBAUM, ELLIOT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| BAIN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/23/2011 |
| BELL, BILLIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/03/2023 |
| JOHNSON, TONY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/26/2012 |
| MANGOLD, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/31/2023 |
| WINDROW, ZACHARY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/26/2012 |
| WINKLER, JUDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2004 |
| YOUNG, CARLTON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2006 |
| ARANDA, EMANUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2025 |
| CHRISTIANSEN, KEITH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| FLORES, ANTONIO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ROSS, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| 1210 EASTWOOD DRIVE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| DWD TX HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REG HG OPCO 1, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REG HG OPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REGENCY IHS OF GUADALUPE VALLEY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REGENCY IHS REHAB LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
| DEKOWSKI, DONOVAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 35 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455869. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.