No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of Raymo

1700 S Expressway 77, Raymondville, TX 78580 · Government - Hospital district · 120 certified beds · (956) 689-2126 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (956) 689-2126 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
910 E Hidalgo Ave
Pharmacy
640 S Frontage Rd · (956) 690-4090 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
152 S 10th St · (956) 689-1329 · Call to confirm hours
Park
605 S 3rd St · (956) 689-6786 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
617 E Wood Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.0%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.6%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%88.0%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.3%CMS range 49.2–86.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.0–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
41.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 53.4 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation for resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of needs and accommodation being unmet. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 4/29/2026 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female, re-admitted on [DATE] (initial admission date 5/7/2010), with diagnoses of Dementia (a condition characterized by progressive of persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain), Schizophrenia (chronic, severe mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, and emotional responsiveness, often involving hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking), Type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable and infections for 1 of 1 laundry room and 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed or infection control in that:The facility failed to ensure textiles used for cleaning were stored properly to prevent contamination.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided tracheostomy care using sterile technique. These failures could result in the transmission of infection and illness. Findings included: 1. In an observation and interview on 2/24/2026 at 2:50 PM, the facility's only laundry room was observed to have textiles used for cleaning on an open rack near the washing machines. This area was separated from the space containing the dryers by a closed door. The textiles on the rack included rags, reusable mopping pads, and mop heads. The HSK said soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident and staff member was offered the COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention. The facility failed to offer residents and staff the 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccination. This failure could lead to the contraction and transmission of respiratory illness. Findings included: Record review of the staff vaccination records for 2025 did not reveal documentation of COVID-19 vaccination administration or documentation for the facility. In an interview on 02/25/2026 at 7:22 AM, the ADON said she served as the Infection Preventionist for the facility. She said the facility did not offer COVID-19 vaccinations to residents or staff in fall 2025, and they only offered influenza (flu) and pneumococcal (pneumonia, or an infection of the lungs) vaccinations to eligible staff/residents. She said the facility did not offer COVID-19 vaccinations because it was not required by state regulations. In a subsequent interview with the ADON on 02/25/2026 at 11:20 AM, she said the language of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for safe and functioning equipment.The facility had 1 of 1 stand-up freezers inoperable. Based on observation on 2/23/2026 at 2:00 pm, the kitchen surveyor noted that the stand-up freezer was broken and inoperable. Based on interview with FSM on 2/23/2026 at 2:00 pm, FSM stated that the freezer has been broken for over a year and that they are storing food in a chest freezer. FSM stated that the work order has been placed in but they have not received a new one. FSM stated that he has to make changes to the menu as some of the food comes bulk from food service company and he does not have the space. Surveyor asked if they obtain food from other sources and FSM replied that they run to HEB for smaller packages of items like broccoli as an example. Based on interview on 2/24/2026 at 11:55 with FSM, FSM stated they were supposed to have baked ham for lunch, but he could not order the ham due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, are reported within established timelines to the administrator of the facility and to the SSA for 5 of 7 residents (Residents #8, #16, #26, #20, #32) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure unexplained bruises found on Resident #32's right arm and wrist on 12/16/2025 were reported to the SSA.The facility failed to ensure a physical altercation between Residents #16 and #26 on 1/3/2026, in which Resident #26 allegedly scratched Resident #16 on the arm after he attempted to grab her breast, was reported to the SSA.The facility failed to ensure a physical altercation between Residents #8 and #20 on 1/5/2026, in which Resident #20 allegedly scratched Resident #8 on the face after he yelled at her, was reported to the SSA.The facility failed to ensure a physical altercation between Residents #20 and #26 on 1/18/2026, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and reported the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 5 of 7 residents (Residents #8, #16, #26, #20, #32) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure unexplained bruises found on Resident #32's right arm and wrist on 12/16/2025 were thoroughly investigated and the results reported.The facility failed to ensure a physical altercation between Residents #16 and #26 on 1/3/2026, in which Resident #26 allegedly scratched Resident #16 on the arm after he attempted to grab her breast, was thoroughly investigated and the results reported.The facility failed to ensure a physical altercation between Residents #8 and #20 on 1/5/2026, in which Resident #20 allegedly scratched Resident #8 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 18.51%, based on 5 errors out of 27 opportunities, which involved 3 of 6 residents (Residents #18, #43 and #49) and 3 of 4 staff (LVN A, LVN B, and MA C) reviewed for medication administration and medications errors. The facility failed to ensure the staff administered medications to Residents #18, #43 and #49 timely, according to physician orders, and professional standards. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions.The findings include: A record review of resident #49's admission record dated 2/26/2026 revealed an admission date of 2/3/2025 with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus type II (a chronic metabolic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels, occurring when the body cannot properly produce or use insulin). A record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication administration errors for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #18) reviewed for medication administration. Resident #18 was not administered his high blood pressure medication as prescribed. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications.The findings include: A record review of Resident #18's admission record revealed an admission date of 10/12/2023 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a blockage in an artery supplying blood to the brain, leading to the death of brain tissue due to lack of oxygen). A record review of Resident #18's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care related to Resident #18's needs with ADLs. Resident #18 was assessed with a BIMS score of 10 out of a possible 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. A record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 (Kitchen 1) of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. The facility failed to store food preparation equipment in sanitary area.The facility failed to store and maintain drink dispensing guns between and during meal services in a sanitary method during survey of facility. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infections, food contaminations, food-borne illnesses, and diminished quality of life. 1.Based on observation on 2/23/2026 at 1:45 pm surveyor noted that facility was storing two crockpots in their kitchen chemical closet. Above the crockpots were gallons of degreaser for kitchen use.During an interview with FSM on 2/23/2026 at 1:45 pm, the FSM stated that the crockpots belonged to the Activities Department and they kept them in the chemical closet in-between uses. Surveyor asked what the policy was for storing items in the chemical closet and the FSM stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care (including tracheostomy care), was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (Resident # 1) of 1 resident with a tracheostomy reviewed for respiratory and tracheostomy care.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's Tracheostomy humidification with air compressor was at 20 PSI per physician order. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #1's inner canula daily change was completed using sterile technique per medical guidelines for procedure.This failure could affect residents with oxygen therapy and tracheostomy status and could lead to respiratory distress, infection control issues, and even death. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record on 2/23/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses include Tracheostomy Status ( presence of an artificial, temporary or permanent opening in the windpipe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial need that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans.1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan included he was under EBP (refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloved use during high contact resident care activities) due to having an Indwelling/foley catheter.2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had an order for EBP (refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloved use during high contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had an order for EBP (refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloved use during high contact resident care activities). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by adequately trained nurses and could result in a decline in health.The findings included:Record review of Resident#1's admission sheet, dated 01/21/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admit date of 12/15/25 and an original admission date of 05/29/24. His relevant diagnoses included; dementia (a progressive aging condition involving significant cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for EBP.The facility failed to ensure CNA A wore proper PPE during peri-care for Resident #1 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This failure could place residents at risk of MDRO contamination. The findings included: Record review of Resident#1's admission sheet, dated 01/21/256, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admit date of 12/15/25 and an original admission date of 05/29/24. His relevant diagnoses included; dementia (a progressive aging condition involving significant cognitive decline-memory loss, impaired language, and behavioral changes), bladder-neck obstruction (blockage where the bladder's opening to the urethra doesn't open properly during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (which included to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting alleged allegation of abuse. CNA A failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator involving Resident #1 being tucked into bed with a blanket tucked behind her shoulders sometime in March of 2025. This failure could place residents at risk for undetected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (Resident #161, Resident #33, Resident #53, and Resident #15) of 8 residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to post the enhanced barrier precaution sign and no PPE gowns noted in the room or nearby Resident #161's room. 2. During Gtube medication administration for Resident #33, RN K did not sanitize hand after touching the privacy curtain. Then while wearing gloves, he touched the bed remote and with the same pair of gloves, he proceeded to touch the residents Gtube. 3. CNA F failed to wash her hands or use hand sanitizer between glove changes during wound care for Resident #53. 4. The facility failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from a clean to a dirty area during wound care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 7 Residents (Resident #5 and Resident #12) who were observed for ADL care. 1. CNA D stood while feeding Resident #5 her lunch meal on 12/2/24. 2. CNA D stood while feeding Resident #12 her lunch meal on 12/2/24. These deficient practices could affect dependent residents and contribute to feelings of shame or feeling uncomfortable and could place residents at risk of embarrassment, lack of privacy, and loss of dignity. The findings were: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 12/3/24, revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Alzheimer's Disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (A group of lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #157 and Resident #27), staff, and the public in that: The facility failed to ensure bathroom sinks hot water temperatures were below 110 degrees Fahrenheit in occupied room for Resident #157 and Resident #27. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life and at risk for burn injuries. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #157's , electronic face sheet dated 12/04/2024 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia, Mixed Receptive Expressive Language Disorder (problems with speaking), Muscle wasting and Atrophy (loss of muscle tissue), Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and Polyosteoarthritis (arthritis that affects five or more joints at the same time). Record review of Resident #157's comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care plan and provide a summary of their baseline care plan to residents for 1 (Resident #161) of 8 residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan that addressed enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #161 within the required 48-hour timeframe of admission. This deficient practice could place newly admitted residents at risk of not being provided with the necessary care and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #161's face sheet dated 12/02/2024 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Urinary tract infection- ESBL(bacteria resistant to most antibiotics), Metabolic Encephalopathy (a disorder that affects brain function),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a locked compartment under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (Resident #53) of seven residents reviewed for medications. Resident #53 had an unidentified medicated cream in a small plastic cup sitting on his nightstand. This failure could put residents at risk of unauthorized use of medication and accidental ingestions/use of an unprescribed medication. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's admission Record dated 12/02/24 revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute kidney failure with medullary necrosis (a severe condition where the kidneys suddenly lose their ability to filter waste products from the blood, specifically caused by damage and cell death in the inner part of the kidney), essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure that has no identifiable cause), other specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standard or food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety in that: The facility failed to ensure all food items were labeled and dated in the refrigerators and in the dry storage. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. The findings included: An observation and interview during the initial tour of the facility's #2 refrigerator on 12/02/24 at 8:53 a.m. revealed on opened one gallon container of Dijon honey mustard salad dressing with the dates of 04/23 and 05/17 on the lid. The Dietary Manager said they do not use the Dijon dressing that often. An observation of the facility's #1 refrigerator on 12/02/24 at 8:54 a.m. revealed a 17 oz container of Siracha hot chili sauce without a date. An observation of the facility's dry storage on 12/02/24 at 8:56 a.m. revealed six loaves of bread that were not dated. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #2's unwitnessed fall with injury on 01/04/24, where Resident #2 sustained a 4 cm laceration to the back of her head that would not stop bleeding and sent out to the hospital. State Survey Agency was not notified of the fall with injury within 2 hours. The incident occurred on 01/04/24 at 7:30 a.m. and was not reported. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record dated 11/07/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfers, in that: The facility did not ensure Resident #1's RP was provided with a written bed-hold policy on 11-06-2023 when Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of being improperly discharged and placed in unsafe conditions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/12/2024 reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), seizers (uncontrolled jerking, loss of consciousness, blank stares, or other symptoms caused by abnormal electrical activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #1's unwitnessed fall with injury where Resident #1 sustained a 6 cm laceration to the left side of her eyebrow which required 12 stitches to close to State Survey Agency within 24 hours. The incident occurred on 05/10/2024 at 5:34 p.m. The facility emailed the report on 05/13/2024. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 10/10/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Dementia (a general term for a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 (Resident #1 ) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report allegations of resident neglect for Resident #1 to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame of 2 hours on 08/07/24 when Resident #1 had a fall at around 5AM and sustained a serious bodily injury (laceration to her head), which required 22 sutures/staples. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential neglect due to unreported allegations of abuse and neglect. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 's file dated 08/19/24 reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to have physician orders for the residents immediate care at time of admission for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for physician admission orders. The facility failed to have physician orders in place for care/treatment/monitoring of Resident #3's colostomy. This deficient practice could place residents with a colostomy at risk in delay in treatment/care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 08/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year old male with an initial admission date of 10/13/2023 with diagnoses which included: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive system (organs that are important for digesting food and liquids), acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive tract (made up of organs that food/liquid travel through when they are swallowed, digested, absorbed and leave the body as feces), colostomy (surgery to create an opening for the colon through the belly) status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: Resident #3's skin assessment documentation was incomplete. Staff did not document Resident #3's surgical incision. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 08/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year old male with an initial admission date of 10/13/2023 with diagnoses which included: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive system (organs that are important for digesting food and liquids), acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive tract (made up of organs that food/liquid travel through when they are swallowed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: Resident #2's April and May 2024 Treatment Administration Records documentation was incomplete. Staff did not document or sign off on the administration of physician ordered wound care. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 06/13/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4 (sores that extend below the subcutaneous fat into deep tissue, including muscle, tendons and ligaments), Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to request, refuse, and or discontinue treatment, to particpate or in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 4 (Resident #37, Resident #40, Resident #20, Resident #58) of 14 residents whose records were reviewed for Out-of-Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate Order forms in that: 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #40's OOH-DNR form was completed fully and correctly. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #37's OOH-DNR form was completed fully and correctly. 3. Resident #20 had missing information on the front of their OOHDNR ((Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate) form. 4. Resident #58 had missing information on the front of their OOHDNR (Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate) form. These failures could affect the 18 residents in the facility with OOHDNR orders at risk of CPR performed against their wishes. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #37's Face Sheet dated [DATE] indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations, for 1 of 3 residents (R #1) reviewed for incidents/accidents. The facility failed to follow the incidents/accidents policy for an incident on 07/30/23 for R #1. This failure could place residents at risk of further incidents. The findings included: Record review of the Policy: Incidents and Accidents Policy (date implemented: 08/15/22) Compliance Guidelines: 2. Licensed staff will utilize PCC Risk Management to report incidents/accidents and assist with completion of any investigative information to identify root causes. 12. Documentation should include the date, time, nature of the incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications, and orders obtained or follow-up interventions. Record review of R #1's file reflected an [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of 10/11/19. Her diagnoses included: Dementia, Osteoarthritis, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop the resident's comprehensive care plan for two (Resident #40, Resident #44) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans that describe the services to be provided to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being in that: 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #40's choice of Do not Resuscitate code status. 2. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #44 addressing 1/4 side rails to bed. This failure could affect the 18 residents in the facility who chose to formulate advance directives of OOH-DNR at risk of having CPR performed against their wishes and could place resident in the facility at risk for decrease level of function with ADLs, falls and not having personalized plans developed to address their needs. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #40's Face Sheet dated [DATE] indicated Resident #40 was an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 14 residents ( Resident #58), reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: Advanced directive code status was not updated for Resident #58 care plan. These deficient practices could affect residents with comprehensive care plans and could result in missed or delayed continuity of care. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 58's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included osteoarthritis, right knee, history of falling, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, dementia, psychotic disturbance, atrial fibrillation, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #58's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that included the accurate acquiring and receiving of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident noted in 3 of 6 medication carts (Medication cart A) reviewed. Medication cart A contained 1 prescription medication card containing Hydralazine 10mg for Resident #15 that was expired 08/31/2023. The deficient practice could result in a resident receiving a medication that would be ineffective for their treatment resulting in exacerbation of the resident's condition and disease processes. Findings include: During medication pass observation on 09/19/2023 at 03:11PM MA A, was not going to administer Hydralazine 10mg to Resident#15 due to blood pressure reading being out of parameters. Noted Hydralazine 10mg medication card had an expiration date of 8/31/2023. MA G proceeded to take it and show it to RN J who stated that it was probably a pharmacy error. RN J then notified DON and she instructed him to call pharmacy. MA G stated the last time it was administered was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 (CNA) observation for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA E performed proper peri-care (incontinent care) for Resident #14. This deficient practice could place resident in the facility at risk for infections due to improper incontinent care. Findings included: Observation on 09/19/2023 at 1:28 PM, CNA E performed incontinent care for Resident #14, did not clean the buttocks/anal area. An interview on 09/19/2023 with CNA E at 1:56 PM, stated she has not done catheter care in a while. Surveyor asked why she did not clean buttocks/anal area. She said she completely forgot because she was probably concentrating on doing catheter care correctly. Stated she normally does clean the buttocks/anal area. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLSENTIAL HEALTH — 67 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 66 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CentBastrop, TX 1 of 5Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMcAllen, TX 1 of 5Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrownsville, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Transitional Care CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 1 of 5Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Jefferson Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLaredo, TX 1 of 5Lavaca Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 1 of 5Longview Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Spindletop Hill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Town and Country Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBoerne, TX 1 of 5Wharton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWharton, TX 2 of 5Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBrenham, TX 2 of 5Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Corpus Christi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg, TX 2 of 5Elgin Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElgin, TX 2 of 5Guadalupe Valley Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSeguin, TX 2 of 5Hallettsville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville, TX 2 of 5Heritage Park Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CAustin, TX 2 of 5Live Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGeorge West, TX 2 of 5Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEagle Pass, TX 2 of 5Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 2 of 5Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRobstown, TX 2 of 5Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteAustin, TX 2 of 5Windsor AtriumHarlingen, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of SeguiSeguin, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of WeslaWeslaco, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of AliceAlice, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of BastrBastrop, TX 2 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of MorgaCorpus Christi, TX 2 of 5Yoakum Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterYoakum, TX 3 of 5Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHarlingen, TX 3 of 5Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteHouston, TX 3 of 5Port Lavaca Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPort Lavaca, TX 3 of 5The Woodlands Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterThe Woodlands, TX 3 of 5Val Verde Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDel Rio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Mission OaksSan Antonio, TX 3 of 5Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of DuvalAustin, TX

Showing 40 of 66; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STARR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/01/2018
REGENCY IHS OF RAYMONDVILLE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
CSV RHEA MANAGEMENT HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2022
DWD TX HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2022
JACK AND NANCY DWYER WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2022
REG LEASED OPCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2022
REG OPERATOR HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2022
REGENCY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
REGENCY TEXAS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2022
BAIRD, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/13/2021
CLAPP, BARBARAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/01/2021
CORTESE, DARENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/10/2021
GIBSON, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2021
GUERRA, ADRIANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/01/2016
MANDELBAUM, ELLIOTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
MUNOZ, THALIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/1982
PENA, ELISAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/01/2022
SALINAS, ARCADIOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/17/2024
DEKOWSKI, DONOVANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
PLATAS, YESENIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
REGENCY IHS CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
REGENCY IHS REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
MCCLIMANS, CRYSTALIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MERCADO, IMELDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
RODRIGUEZ, JOSEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 8%Other / private 18%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,517per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$237per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next