No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Monument Healthcare American Fork

350 East 300 North, American Fork, UT 84003 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (801) 756-5293 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (801) 756-5293 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)6 actual-harm citations$35,437 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,437 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-06)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 57% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
343 S 500 E · (801) 763-0724 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
135 E Main St · (801) 756-1440 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
135 E Main St · (801) 756-1440 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 E Main St · (801) 756-1438 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.2%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%3.4%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.9%16.5%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.3%15.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.5%25.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.9%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.8%21.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.4%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%0.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.2%91.0%79.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.5%CMS range 23.3–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.3–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.37
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 20.8 residents a day — about 20% occupied, or roughly 85 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.24 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.94 to 1.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-04)
39
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that, for 4 of 47 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choice. Specifically, a resident with an identified mass was not evaluated as requested by the resident representative; a resident was hospitalized after a failure to identify a change of condition in a timely manner; a resident's blood sample was not obtained per protocol which resulted in an emergency room visit; and a resident received medication in error and one medication rectally when oral medication was available. The deficient practice identified for residents 22 and 36 were found to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifiers: 22, 36, 64 and 121. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 6 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility did not provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident with previous falls from falling and sustaining a head laceration and neurological (neuro) checks were not completed as indicated. This deficiency was identified to have occurred at a harm level for resident 27. In addition, a resident who had fallen was moved before an assessment was completed by qualified personnel; the facility had hot water. In addition, facility environment disrepair identified resident accident hazards. Resident identifiers: 25, 27, 44, 47, 51 and 58. Findings Include: HARM 1. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not ensure that 5 of 47 sample residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range. Specifically, current weights were not being obtained to allow staff to appropriately assess the residents' nutritional status. In addition, interventions were not being implemented in a timely manner, residents were not being provided with the appropriate supplements, and were not assisted with meals . The findings for resident 53 were determined to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifiers: 30, 31, 51, 53 and 121. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included crushing injury of right shoulder and upper arm, hemolytic anemia, congestive heart failure, vitamin B12 anemia, osteoporosis, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, and prediabetes. Resident 53's medical record was reviewed from 11/27/23 through 12/6/23. On 8/8/23, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance for the same deficiencies identified in the last annual recertification survey. Resident identifiers: 22, 25, 27, 30, 31, 36, 44, 47, 51, 53, 58, 64 and 121. Findings included: 1. An annual recertification survey was completed on 2/28/22. During that survey F559, F609, F656, F661, F677, F684, F692, F755, F757, F812, F867, F880, F908, F880, F883, F908. F910, F912 and F915 were cited. 2. A recertification survey was completed on 12/6/23. During that survey F609, F656, F677, F684, F692, F755, F812 and F867 were were identified as repeat deficiencies. 3. Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that, for 4 of 47 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, a resident was not provided with the necessary services related to incontinence care, which resulted in the resident acquiring Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD). Resident identifier: 167. Findings included: Resident 167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), unspecified dementia, dehydration, retention of urine, muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease (stage 3), hyperlipidemia, hypertension, difficulty walking, and protein-calorie malnutrition. On 2/22/22 at 12:43 PM, resident 167's family member was interviewed. Resident 167's family member stated they would come to visit resident 167 everyday for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, a resident that was dependant on renal dialysis missed a day of dialysis and had two critical potassium lab values with no interventions which resulted in death. Resident identifier: 111. Findings included: Resident 111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Coronavirus Disease-2019, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus type 2, end stage renal disease, hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, mild cognitive impairment, metabolic encephalopathy, essential hypertension, congestive heart failure, hypoxemia, pain, and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident 111's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Specifically for 1 out of 19 sampled residents, a resident did not have an attempted GDR for psychotropic medications. Resident identifier: 20.Findings included: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and depression.Resident 20's medical record was reviewed on 9/2/25-9/4/25.On 9/2/25 at 9:16 AM, 10:02 AM, and 12:17 PM observations were made of resident 20 sleeping in bed. A physician's order dated 3/14/23, documented clozapine oral tablet (Clozapine) Give 100 mg one time a day for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.A physician's order dated 3/14/23, documented clozapine oral tablet (Clozapine) Give 150 mg one time a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 19 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident was given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including eating. Specifically, a resident did not receive assistance with eating his meals. Resident Identifier: 1 Resident 1 was initially admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including legal blindness, cerebral infarction, tremor, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Resident 1's medical record was reviewed from 9/2/25 through 9/4/25. Resident 1's Care Plan was reviewed. The Care Plan documented that Resident 1 had an activities of daily living deficit related to his hemiplegia, difficulty moving, and his loss of vision. The Care Plan documented that Resident 1 needed setup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, there were numerous observations of staff carrying uncovered dessert and fruit cups down hallways when meal trays were being delivered. On 9/2/25 at 12:20 PM, the hallway lunch service was observed and revealed the following: At 12:20 PM, the meal tray cart was parked outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. An uncovered dessert on the meal tray was walked down the hallway to room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 12:31 PM, the meal tray cart was moved to be in between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. At 12:31 PM, an uncovered dessert on the meal tray was served to room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 12:33 PM, an uncovered dessert was on the meal tray and was served to room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/3/25 at 12:26 PM, the Administrator (ADM) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 6 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhanced of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, a staff member escalated with a resident regarding financial concerns, residents were observed eating when another resident was bleeding in the dining room, staff were not knocking before entering resident rooms, residents voiced concerns regarding staff attitudes, and staff were observed yelling at each other in the hallways. Resident identifiers: 17, 22, 24, 39, 43 and 51. Findings include: 1. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis of left lower limb, collapsed vertebra, major depressive disorder, dementia and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. On 12/6/23 at 12:04 PM, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not inform each resident periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, including any charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate. Specifically, for 3 out of 3 sampled residents, a resident was not issued a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) when the Medicare part A services were terminated. Resident identifiers: 38, 62, and 124. Findings include: On 11/28/23, the facility provided a list of residents who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the last 6 months. Resident 38 was as listed as having been discharged on 11/1/23. Resident 62 was listed as having been discharged on 9/6/23. Resident 124 was listed as having been discharged on 9/6/23. On 12/4/23, the medical records for residents 38, 62, and 124 were reviewed. No NOMNC was located in any of the residents' medical records. On 12/5/23 at 1:05 PM, an interview was conducted with Regional Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, the facility environment was in disrepair which included resident safety hazards, there was lack of hot water, low water pressure in a sink and another sink did not have hot water. Resident identifiers: 36, 39, 40 and 64. Findings included: 1. On 11/30/23 at 1:44 PM, a tour of the facility was conducted. The following observations were made: a. A handrail was loose near the maintenance door and the double doors had a broken metal beam along the bottom of the door that projected out towards the hallway. b. The central bath shower room had: 3 missing cabinet handles, a counter with the first layer chipped off, the first layer of the drywall peeled off near the sink and light switch, chipped paint on four corners of the wall, eight holes in the wall near the toilet, and caulking that had pulled away from the wall with missing pieces around a sink. c. Plastic was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse, neglect, misappropriate of resident property, and exploitation. Specifically, a resident was not provided medication, nutrition and fluids. Resident identifiers: 121. Findings include: 1. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility 7/1/23 and discharged on 7/8/23 with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, monoclonal gammopathy, transient cerebral ischemic attack, pulmonary fibrosis, and respiratory disorder. A form titled exhibit 358 was submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 9/1/23 at 12:03 AM. The form revealed there was an allegation of Deprivation of Goods and Services by Staff. The form revealed what was reported On the morning of August 31sr [sic], 2023, aroujd [sic] 10:30am, I [ADM 1] rece]ived [sic] a call from [name removed]/APS [Adult Protective Services]; She informed me of an allegation her office had received regarding [resident 121],.and concerns with her 8-day respite stay from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined, for 3 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency (SSA). In addition, report the results of all investigations to the SSA within 5 working days of the incident. Specifically, the facility did not report allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the incident. Resident identifiers: 9, 32 and 121. Findings included: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, border line personality disorder, mild cognitive impairment, suicide ideations, and history of falling. Resident 32's medical record was reviewed on 11/28/23. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 47 sampled residents, that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect, a resident who sustained a significant injury, and an elopement. Resident Identifiers: 9, 32 and 121. Findings included: 1. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 7/8/23 with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, monoclonal gammopathy, transient cerebral ischemic attack, pulmonary fibrosis, and respiratory disorder. A form titled exhibit 358 was submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 9/1/23 at 12:03 AM. The form revealed there was an allegation of Deprivation of Goods and Services by Staff. The form revealed what was reported On the morning of August 31sr [sic], 2023, aroujd [sic] 10:30am, I [ADM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 5 of 47 sampled residents that the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan included the services needed to achieve the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, a resident was on a medication that required monitoring, which was not addressed in the comprehensive care plan; nutrition care plans were not developed, and vision care plans were not developed. Resident identifiers: 22, 51, 53, 170 and 268. Findings included: 1. Resident 170 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure, encephalopathy and seizures. Resident 170's medical record was reviewed 11/27/23 through 12/6/23. An admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS). Resident 170 scored a BIMS of 3 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. A physician order dated 11/6/23, Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 5 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living did not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that such diminution was unavoidable. Specifically, two residents did not receive showers as requested or as scheduled. In addition, residents were not provided assistance with nail care or dining. Resident identifiers: 15, 27, 30, 36, and 51. Findings Included: 1. Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and vascular dementia. On 11/27/23 at 11:22 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 27's family member. Resident 27's family member stated resident 27 was showered only when staff were able to. Resident 27's family member stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Specifically, it was determined that the facility did not provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the resident's needs in the areas of answering resident call lights in a timely manner; obtaining resident weights; or assisting the residents with their bathing. Resident Identifiers: 9, 30, 39, 53, 63, and 64. Findings include: RESIDENT INTERVIEWS 1. On 11/27/23 at 11:33 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 9. Resident 9 stated that the CNA's get upset with her when she gets up on her own and they tell her to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview it was determined that the facility did not employ a clinically qualified full-time dietitian or another clinically qualified nutrition professional to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not a employ a full time Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Manager (DM) did not meet the requirements to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Findings include: On 11/29/23 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility DM. The DM stated that he started his Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) course a month ago, after he was promoted to the DM position. The DM stated that he was employed as a cook prior to the promotion. The DM stated that there was a corporate CDM and Registered Dietitian (RD) that were in the facility, but that they were onsite only once a week.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the menus were followed. Specifically, residents who were prescribed a fortified diet, were not provided with the appropriate foods. Findings include: On 11/29/23 at 2:20 PM, the facility Dietary Manager (DM) provided a list of residents receiving a fortified diet to surveyors. The DM also provided a spreadsheet of the menu for residents receiving a fortified diet. The DM was asked how he fortified the milk that was provided to residents. The DM stated that he was using whole milk as the fortified milk. The DM stated that he used to add fortified milk powder to 2% milk but that the most recent manager before him told him to just use whole milk instead. When asked about alternate meals, the DM stated that there were not alternate menu items prepared in advance, and that if we have extra chicken, we just say let's make an extra chicken dish. On 12/4/23 at 1:47 PM, an interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 stated she was prepping food for dinner. [NAME] 1 stated she did not know what a fortified diet was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 9 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained of food quality, a test tray was bland and resident council minutes revealed complaints of food quality. Resident identifiers: 9, 10, 15, 17, 18, 32, 36, 39 and 64. Findings include: Interviews: 1. On 11/28/23 at 9:42 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 39. Resident 39 stated she lost 40 pounds because she cant eat this food. Resident 39 stated the food did not look good. Resident 39 stated the food was cold, there was no flavor and the food was the same thing everyday. Resident 39 stated she was served rotten lettuce and pears. Resident 39 stated she asked staff how do you expect us to eat this?. 2. On 11/27/23 at 11:18 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 18. Resident 18 stated she did not get any snacks of any kind and was not offered snacks after dinner. 3. On 11/28/23 at 9:28 AM, an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs. Specifically, pureed foods were not prepared appropriately. Resident identifier: 36. Findings include: 1. On 11/27/23 at 10:41 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 36. Resident 36 stated he was on a pureed diet and the food taste did not taste good. 2. On 11/29/23 at 12:35 PM, a sample tray was requested from the facility. The tray was placed in the last cart to be passed to residents. After all residents had been served from the cart, as of 12:51 PM, the sample tray was observed and temperatures were taken. The pureed meal served was ground beef, refried beans, zucchini, and a pumpkin dessert. All of the items were brown. The pureed meat was 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and had a watery taste. The meat did not have any flavor and was bland. The zucchini was 96 degrees F, and had watery consistency instead of the appropriate pureed consistency. The pureed zucchini had run into the beans and meat on the plate. The pureed refried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility did not serve food that accommodated resident preferences. Specifically, three residents were provided meals that were inconsistent with their requests. Resident identifiers: 28, 60 and 123. Findings include: On 11/29/23, an observation was made of the lunch meal. The following observations were made: a. Resident 60's meal ticket was observed. The meal ticket indicated that resident 60 had requested a double cheeseburger as an alternate, but was served the regular meal of a taco with beans. b. Resident 123's meal ticket was observed. The meal ticket indicated that resident 123 had requested a cheeseburger as an alternate, but was served the regular meal of a taco with beans. c. Resident 28's meal ticket was observed. The meal ticket indicated that resident 28 was to receive fortified milk and a banana. The resident received a regular milk, and no banana. On 11/29/23 at 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated that there were alternates that the residents could choose from if they did not want…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility did not provide a nourishing snack at bedtime or upon request. Resident identifiers: 10, 18, 32 and 39. Findings include: 1. On 11/28/23 at 9:42 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 39. Resident 39 stated she was not offered snacks between meals or at bedtime. 2. On 11/27/23 at 11:18 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 18. Resident 18 stated she did not get any snacks of any kind and was not offered snacks after dinner. 3. On 11/27/23 at 2:23 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 32. Resident 32 stated sometimes there was not enough food. 4. On 11/28/23 at 10:32 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 10. Resident 10 stated he did not receive snacks at night. 5. On 11/27/23, a staff member was observed in the hallway by the kitchen talking to another staff member. The staff members stated that there were no snacks available on the evening of 11/25/23, which was a Saturday. On 12/6/23 at approximately 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)CNA 4. CNA 4 stated that snacks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, cross contamination was observed during the trayline process. Findings include: 1. On 11/29/23 the trayline process for the lunch meal was observed. The following observations were made: a. At 12:24 PM, [NAME] 2 was observed to touch his glasses and then pick up silverware and place it on a tray. [NAME] 2 was then observed to place his fingers on the inside of a dessert cup as he picked up the cup to place it on a resident tray. b. At 12:27 PM, [NAME] 2 was observed to touch his face and then continue to place silverware and other items on resident trays. c. At 12:28 PM, [NAME] 2 was observed to touch his pants, glasses, and apron before touching silverware and other items for resident trays. d. At 12:30 PM, [NAME] 2 was observed to touch his glasses, and then place covers on resident plates, touch silverware, and cups of dessert. 2. On 12/6/23 at 9:05 AM, an observation was made in the Secured Unit. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility assessment must address or include both the number of residents and facility's resident capacity; the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that were present within that population; the staff competencies that were necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population; the physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plan considerations that were necessary to care for this population; and any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility, including but not limited to, activities and food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not have an accurate facility assessment that included all of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails. Specifically, four handrails throughout the facility were found to be loose which created a resident safety hazard. Findings included: An initial facility tour was conducted on 11/30/23 at 1:44 PM. Loose handrail was observed in the following corridors: 1. Outside of the maintenance door. 2. Outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. Two doors down from the entrance of the main activity room. 4. Outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 12/5/23 at 11:09 AM, a facility walk through was completed with Regional Plant Operations 1. Regional Plan Operations 1 observed the loose handrails. On 12/5/23 at 11:09 AM, an interview was conducted with Regional Plant Operations 1. Regional Plant Operations 1 stated that he had probably not seen anything that needed repair because the facilities maintenance staff was no longer employed at the facility as of 11/30/23.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide training to their nurse aides that was sufficient ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year; include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training; address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews and facility assessment and may address the special needs of residents as determined by the facility staff; and address the care of the cognitively impaired. Findings include: On 12/6/23 at 4:33 PM, an interview was conducted with Administrator (ADM) 2. ADM 2 stated nurse aide training was completed through a computer application. ADM 2 stated they would need to send the training information. No additional information was provided regarding Nurse Aide training the facility provided.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility failed to provide residents the right to participate in the development and implementation of a person-centered plan of care, the right to attend meetings regarding the person-centered plan of care, and the right to request revisions to the person-centered plan of care. Specifically, a resident representative was not informed or included in care planning meetings in which concerns regarding the resident's plan of care could be discussed. Resident identifier: 22. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, moderate intellectual disabilities, atherosclerotic heart disease, asthma, and hypertension. On 11/28/23 at 10:24 AM, an interview was conducted with a Family Member (FM). The FM stated she did not know about meetings where her family member's plan of care would be discussed and had never been asked to join any meetings. The FM stated she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that the resident's right to self administer medications was clinically appropriate. Specifically, a resident was observed to have medications on the bedside table in a medication cup and was not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self administer medications. Resident identifier: 9 Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, cognitive communication deficit, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. On 11/27/23 at 11:33 AM, an observation was made of resident 9's room. There were multiple medications observed in the medication cup on the breakfast tray located on resident 9's bedside table. Resident 9 was interviewed and stated there she had just woken up and had not see the medication cup. Resident 9 stated that she would often wake up to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility failed to promote and facilitate self-determination through support of resident choice, including the right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that were significant to the resident. Specifically, a resident was not assisted in obtaining services to get their hair done. Resident identifier: 57. Findings included: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, delusional disorders, type 2 diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hypertension, leukemia, dementia, and hypothyroidism. On 11/27/23 at 10:56 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 57 in the dining room. Resident 57 stated that she wanted to get her hair straightened, but the facility could not do her hair. Resident 57 further stated she had asked the nurses, but they did not help. An observation was made of resident 57. Resident 57 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to manage his or her financial affairs. Specifically, there was no system for staff to track how a resident with dementia's money was spent. Resident identifier: 43. Findings include: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis of left lower limb, collapsed vertebra, major depressive disorder and dementia. On 12/6/23 at 12:04 PM, an observation was made of resident 43 and the Activities Director (AD). Resident 43 was yelling that his bank card had been taken and was being used. Resident 43 stated that his bank account had charges that were not from him and he was being ripped off. Resident 43 stated he got hammered for 500 to 600 dollars this month. Resident 43 stated to the AD that he was charged for too many cartons of cigarettes that month. The AD was observed to raise her voice and tell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide individual financial records through quarterly statements for 1 of 47 sample residents who had entrusted the facility with their personal funds. Resident identifier: 18. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, viral hepatitis C, history of transient ischemic attack, and hyperlipidemia. On 11/27/28 at 11:18 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 18. Resident 18 stated that she had a personal funds account with the facility but that she did not receive statements to let her know how much money she had in her account. On 12/5/23, the Business Office Manager (BOM) confirmed that resident 18 had a personal funds account with the facility, and provided surveyors with a statement of resident 18's transaction history of the previous 6 months. On 12/6/23, an interview was conducted with the BOM regarding the process of personal funds accounting. The BOM stated that he had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility did not send a copy of resident 30-day discharge notices or hospitalizations to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings include: On 11/27/23 an interview was conducted with Administrator (ADM) 1. ADM 1 stated that the Social Worker (SW) was in charge of sending a monthly list to the ombudsman (OMB) of residents who had been hospitalized and/or given a 30 day discharge notice. On 11/29/23 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility SW. The facility SW stated that he was in charge of keeping a log of residents who had been discharged from the facility. The SW stated that he had not been sending a monthly list to the ombudsman of residents who had been hospitalized and/or given a 30 day discharge notice. The SW stated that it was brought up a month ago in a facility staff meeting because it wasn't being done, but no one was put in charge of it, and there was no plan. The SW stated that the county ombudsman had not asked him for the list. On 11/28/23, OMB 1 arrived at the facility. OMB 1 stated that she had not been receiving a monthly list…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. Specifically, there were no baseline care plan created for a resident that was admitted for respite stay. Resident identifier: 121. Findings include. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 7/8/23 with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, monoclonal gammopathy, transient cerebral ischemic attack, pulmonary fibrosis, and respiratory disorder. Resident 121's medical record was reviewed 12/4/23 through 12/6/23. There were no baseline care plans located in resident 121's medical record. Additional information was requestef for care plan on 12/12/23. Care plans provided were initaited on 12/12/23. It should be note that resident 121 discharged [DATE]. On 12/6/23 at 2:23 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3. LPN 3 stated that nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. Specifically, a resident was not provided with assistance with relocation to a different facility despite multiple requests. Resident identifier: 8. Findings include: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, acute respiratory failure, chronic heart failure, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, chronic viral hepatitis C, and protein calorie malnutrition. On 11/28/23 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 8. Resident 8 stated that I've been trying to get out of here for 4 years. Resident 8 stated that the social workers here just wait until their next job…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide the necessary care and services to ensure that activities of daily living that included hygiene: bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care, were carried out to maximize the resident's functional abilities. Specifically, a resident was not provided oral care, assistance in using corrective lenses or ensuring the resident was wearing shoes. Resident identifier: 22 Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, moderate intellectual disabilities, atherosclerotic heart disease, asthma, and hypertension. 1. On 11/28/23 at 10:24 AM, it was observed that resident 22 had multiple teeth that were broken, light brown, and had a yellow substance along the border of her gums and in the crevices between her teeth. Resident 22's medical record was reviewed 11/27/23 through 12/6/23. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. Specifically, a resident with a positive urinary tract infection did not receive timely results for a urinalysis and a culture and sensitivity. Resident identifier: 17. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson disease, urinary tract obstruction, and dementia. On 12/4/23 at 1:10 PM an interview was conducted with resident 17. Resident 17 stated that he was frequently on antibiotics for infections with his superpubic catheter. Resident 17's medical record was reviewed 11/27/23 through 12/6/23. A care plan dated 12/12/22, documented a focus that resident 17 has a super pubic catheter: r/t [related to] bph [benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Interventions included: a. the resident has 16 indwelling. position catheter bag and tubing below the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biological's to its residents. Specifically, a resident was not administered medications as ordered by the physician due to the medications not being available by the pharmacy. Resident identifier: 21 Findings Included: Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective type, type 2 diabetes mellitus, diastolic congestive heart failure and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 21's medical record was reviewed on 11/30/23. On 11/5/23 at 11:40 AM, an order administration note stated, Renvela Oral Packet 0.8 GM . Give 3 packet by mouth before meals every Mon [Monday], Tue [Tuesday], Wed [Wednesday], Thu [Thursday], Fri [Friday], Sat [Saturday], Sun [Sunday] related to hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 47 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who received psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Specifically, a resident was prescribed a psychotropic medication with an off label use and with out adequate monitoring. Resident identifier: 170. Findings include: Resident 170 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure, encephalopathy, seizures. Resident 170's medical record was review 11/27/23 through 12/6/23. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A physician order dated 11/6/23, Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet 25 MG [milligrams], give 1 tablet at bedtime for sleep. [It should be noted quetiapine was an antipsychotic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 47 sampled resident, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, a dialysis resident was not administered their Renvela oral packet which was a phosphate binder as ordered by the physician. In addition, another resident was not administered their appropriate medications. Resident Identifiers: 21 and 121. Findings include: 1. Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis which included hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective type, type 2 diabetes mellitus, diastolic congestive heart failure and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 21's medical record was reviewed on 11/30/23. On 11/5/23 at 11:40 AM, an order administration note stated, Renvela Oral Packet 0.8 GM . Give 3 packet by mouth before meals every Mon [Monday], Tue [Tuesday], Wed [Wednesday], Thu [Thursday], Fri [Friday], Sat [Saturday], Sun…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 2 of 47 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain laboratory services only when ordered by a physician. Specifically, resident's had laboratory services completed without a physician's order. Resident identifier: 36 and 121. Findings include: 1. Resident 121 was admitted to the facility 7/1/23 and discharged on 7/8/23 with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, monoclonal gammopathy, transient cerebral ischemic attack, pulmonary fibrosis, and respiratory disorder. Resident 121's medical record was reviewed 12/3/23 through 12/6/23. A progress note dated 7/7/23 at 9:43 AM, Called [name removed and phone number] with urine sample for [name of lab] to process. Hospice company. There was no physician's order or results located in resident 121's medical record. On 12/6/23 at 4:22 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that she needed to call the hospice company to get the urine analysis (UA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 47 sampled resident, that the facility did not ensure that the antibiotic stewardship program included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor the antibiotic use. Specifically, residents with urinary tract infections were started on an antibiotic without Culture and Sensitivity results. Resident identifiers: 27 and 39. Findings Included: 1. Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and vascular dementia. Resident 27's medical record was reviewed 11/29/23 to 12/6/23. On 11/28/23 at 4:16 PM, a nurse note stated, regarding recent multiple falls. contusion/ bruising to the right side of forehead continues to heal routinely. bruising turning from purple to yellowish in color. Md [medical doctor] orders to collect ua [urinalysis] with c&s [culture and sensitivity] as indicated . On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, for 3 out of 32 sampled residents, medications were not administered as ordered by the physician due to not being available by the pharmacy. Resident identifiers: 111, 112, and 113. Findings included: 1. Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, end stage renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, reduced mobility, combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, edema, essential primary hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident 112's medical record was reviewed on 2/23/22. On 2/10/22 at 2:31 PM, a Nursing Note documented that resident 112 was admitted from the local hospital. On 2/10/22 at 10:02 PM, an Orders - Administration Note documented amiodarone tablet 200…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility's communal resident refrigerator contained items without proper labeling, and the resident communal snack refrigerator was maintained at a temperature higher than recommended standards. Findings included: On 2/24/22 at 10:21 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was interviewed about the location of resident communal refrigerators. LPN 2 stated near the nurses' station there was a small refrigerator for resident snacks supplied by the kitchen, and there was also a larger refrigerator in the employee break room which would be used for resident food. LPN 2 stated the refrigerator in the break room was for resident and employee food. LPN 2 stated there was also a small refrigerator at the nurses station of the Memory Care unit which could be used for resident food. On 2/24/22 at 10:22 AM, the resident communal snack refrigerator was examined. The refrigerator had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, staff were observed without eye protection while working with residents on the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) unit, staff were observed to have dropped medications on the top of the medicine cart, staff picked up mediation with a bare hand and administered medications to a resident, and staff did not clean the end of an insulin pen prior to applying the needle for administration. Resident identifiers: 7 Findings included: 1. On 2/24/22 at 9:15 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. LPN 4 dropped a medication capsule on top of the medication cart then picked up the capsule with an ungloved right hand after touching the medication cart, medication cup, and medication cards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed. Specifically, for 2 out of 32 sampled residents, a resident did not receive written notice prior to receiving a new roommate and a resident did not receive written notice prior to the room change. Resident identifiers: 12 and 112. Findings included: 1. Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, end stage renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, reduced mobility, combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, edema, essential primary hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and dependence on renal dialysis. On 2/22/22 at 3:27 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 112. Resident 112 stated he was moved to a different room because he had issues with his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, an incident of employee to resident sexual abuse was not reported to the State Survey Agency or Adult Protective Services (APS) no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. Resident identifier: 4. Findings included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, chronic pain syndrome, functional quadriplegia, dysphagia, post-traumatic stress disorder, Coronavirus Disease-2019, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, for 2 out of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not demonstrate implementation of care plan interventions related to a resident's incontinence, did not develop interventions within a resident's potential skin integrity impairment care plan, and did not update a resident's care plan related to the resident's nutrition risk. Resident identifiers: 51 and 167. Findings included: 1. Resident 167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), unspecified dementia, dehydration, retention of urine, muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident's discharge summary was complete. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, the resident's discharge summary did not include a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the final summary of the resident's status at discharge, a reconciliation of all medications, or a post-discharge plan of care. Resident identifier: 32. Findings include: Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included necrotizing fasciitis, venous insufficiency, collapsed vertebra, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, cellulitis, cognitive communication deficit, essential hypertension, and sleep apnea. On 2/22/22, resident 32's medical record was reviewed. Physician's orders from 2/14/22, revealed resident 32 discharged from the facility on 2/14/22. On 2/14/22 at 11:33 AM, the Discharge Summary revealed resident 32 was discharged to another assisted living facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, a resident who had experienced a significant weight loss did not have interventions put in place to prevent further significant weight loss. Resident identifier: 51. Findings included: Resident 51 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure, history of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes, vascular dementia, protein calorie malnutrition, hypokalemia, pneumonia, sepsis, anxiety, and need for assistance with personal care. On 2/22/22 at 7:55 AM, an observation of resident 51 was conducted. Resident 51 was observed to be sitting up in bed with the breakfast tray on the bedside table in front of resident 51.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combinations of the reasons above. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, the facility did not administer hypertensive medications when the blood pressure measurements were outside of the physician ordered parameters. Resident identifier: 22. Findings included: Resident 22 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, bacteremia, dependence on renal dialysis, depressive disorder and essential hypertension. On 2/22/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of correction to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance at a harm level with F677, which was cited within the facility's 2019 recertification survey. Also, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F883, which was cited within an abbreviated, complaint survey completed on 2/9/21. Resident identifiers: 167. Findings included: An annual recertification survey was completed on 12/5/19. During the survey deficiencies F550, F600, F677, F745, F761, F770, F842, and F849 were cited. An abbreviated, focused infection control survey was completed on 2/9/21. During the survey deficiency F883 was cited. An annual recertification survey was completed on 5/20/21. During the survey deficiencies F677 and F883 were identified as repeat deficiencies. 1. Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure a resident who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that each resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, the medical record did not include documentation that information or education was provided regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. In addition, the medical record did not included the administration or the refusal of the immunizations. Resident identifier: 47. Findings included: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, shortness of breath, and pain. Resident 47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment were kept in safe operating condition. Specifically, the facility was unable to ensure a resident had a functioning bed while at the facility. Resident identifier: 2. Findings included: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), major depressive disorder, polycystic ovarian syndrome, hypertension, abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of falling, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, idiopathic aseptic necrosis of the pelvis, fracture of the upper end of the right tibia, hypothyroidism, protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. On 2/23/22 08:46 AM, resident 2 was interviewed. Resident 2 stated their bed would not raise higher than several inches above the ground, and it had started to give her slight pain in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0910 — isolated
    Ensure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not ensure that resident rooms were designed and equipped for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy of resident. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, the staff were storing the residents walker and wheelchair in the hallway outside of the residents room when they were not in use. Resident identifier: 113. Findings included: Resident 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to Coronavirus Disease-2019, orthopedic aftercare, displaced comminuted fracture of left patella, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, history of falling, chronic viral hepatitis C, diabetes mellitus type 2, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, and asthma. On 2/22/22 at 11:39 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 113. Resident 113 stated it was very difficult for her to maneuver the walker into the bathroom and use the toilet. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not ensure that a single resident room measured at least 100 square feet. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, the resident's usable living space of the room measured under 100 square feet. Resident identifier: 113. Findings included: Resident 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to Coronavirus Disease-2019, orthopedic aftercare, displaced comminuted fracture of left patella, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, history of falling, chronic viral hepatitis C, diabetes mellitus type 2, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, and asthma. On 2/22/22 at 11:39 AM, an observation was conducted of resident 113's room. Resident 113 was standing next to the side her bed and was observed leaning against her bed side table which was pushed up against the adjacent wall. An interview was conducted with resident 113. Resident 113…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-28 · tag F0915 — isolated
    Ensure each resident room has a window to the outside that meets requirements
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not ensure that a resident bedroom had at least one window to the outside. Specifically, for 1 out of 32 sampled residents, a resident bedroom did not have a window to the outside. The window was located within the resident bathroom and was unable to be seen from the resident bed. Resident identifier: 113. Findings included: Resident 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but not limited to Coronavirus Disease-2019, orthopedic aftercare, displaced comminuted fracture of left patella, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, history of falling, chronic viral hepatitis C, diabetes mellitus type 2, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder, and asthma. On 2/22/22 at 11:39 AM, an observation was conducted of resident 113's room. Resident 113's room was observed to not have a window to the outside. The window was observed in resident 113's bathroom and resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-06 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility did not have the nurse staffing information posted. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: Facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered Nurses, Licensed practical nurses, Certified Nurse aides, and resident census. The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift and maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. Additionally, the information must be displayed in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings include: On 11/27/23 an initial tour was conducted of the facility. The nurse staff posting was located, but was dated 10/13/23. On 12/5/23, the nurse staff posting was observed to be dated 10/13/23. On 12/5/23 at 1:05 PM, an interview was conducted with Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) 1. RNC 1 stated the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,437 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $35,437 — penalty dated 2023-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MURRAY, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2020
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2020
HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
BENNETT, TIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
CLAWSON, TRAVISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
ESPINOSA, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
FRAGOSO, LINDSAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MARRIOTT, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
OTTLEY, BRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
ROBERTSON, BRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
SAMUELIAN, SPENCERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
SEASTRAND, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
WEST, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
WORKMAN, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MONUMENT HEALTH PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MONUMENT REAL ESTATE AMERICAN FORK LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.8M
Related-party expense57% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 4%Other / private 24%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 57% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,550per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Utah
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,475/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465097. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next