Monument Healthcare Stonecreek

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 41% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 77.1 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.49 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not implement pressure ulcer interventions to prevent infection and new ulcers from developing. This will be cited at a harm level. Resident identifier: 3. Findings included:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 4, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 4, and pressure ulcer of left heel.Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 3/26/26 showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. A score of 99 indicated the resident was unable to complete the assessment. Resident 3's MDS section GG…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 5 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's preferences. Specifically, a resident with multiple co-morbidities who had a change in condition, was hospitalized after failure to identify the change in condition in a timely manner. The deficient practice for resident 1 was found to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 1. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-traumatic subdural hemorrhage, encephalopathy, epilepsy, end stage renal disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct, history of falling, attention and concentration deficit following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and schizophrenia. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate and safe. Specifically for 4 out of 40 sampled residents, residents were observed to have medications in their rooms and were not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications. Resident identifiers: 8, 22, 35, and 78.Findings included:1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of left femur, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness.On 6/22/26 at 9:21 AM, a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with resident 8. On resident 8's bedside table there was a bottle of turmeric tablets and one white tablet. Resident 8 stated that the facility gave him a bunch of pills and he was unsure what the white tablet was. Resident 8 stated that he better take the white pill. A self administration evaluation or an order to self administer medications was not located.On 6/24/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident who entered the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently received one was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary. Specifically, for 3 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not discontinue residents' Foley catheters when there were no indications for use. Additionally, facility staff were not trained on the use of a PureWick for a resident and the PureWick tubing was observed draped over the head of the bed and not able to down drain. Resident identifiers: 3, 46, and 98.Findings included:1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, altered mental status, type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase.On 6/22/26 at 8:50 AM, an observation was made of resident 3. Resident 3 had a urinary catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0775 — pattern
  Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record the laboratory reports that were dated and contained the name and address of the testing laboratory. Specifically, for 3 out of 40 sampled residents, laboratory results were not located in the medical record. Resident identifiers: 4, 46, and 99.Findings included:1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes, and anemia in chronic kidney disease.Resident 4's physician's orders revealed the following:a. On 5/15/26, Admit labs: CBC [complete blood count], CMP [comprehensive metabolic panel], prealbumin, Hga1c [hemoglobin A1C], TSH [thyroid stimulating hormone] one time only for 1 Day.b. On 5/18/26, repeat CBC one time only for 1 day.c. On 5/19/26, Repeat CBC one time only for 1 dayIt should be noted that no laboratory results could be located in the medical record.2. Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the refrigerator and freezer were undated and opened to air. Additionally, food items in resident refrigerators were undated and/or expired.Findings included:1. On 6/22/26 at 7:41 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following were observed:a. In the freezer was an opened bag of chicken breasts that were undated.b. In the freezer was a bag of raisin swirl bread that was opened and undated.c. In the refrigerator was an expired small carton of milk with the use by date of 5/9/26.2. On 6/22/26 at 10:25 AM, the resident refrigerators were observed. The following were observed:a. In the 100 hall resident refrigerator there was an expired yogurt container with a use by date of 6/14/26.b. In the 100 hall resident refrigerator there were four expired yogurt containers with a use by date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was given a psychotropic drug had adequate monitoring of that drug. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident receiving an antidepressant did not receive a gradual dose reduction (GDR) in two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts), unless clinically contraindicated. Resident identifier: 35.Findings included:Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included major depressive disorder. A physician's order dated 9/12/25, documented DULoxetine HCL [hydrochloride] Capsule Delayed Release Particles 30 MG [milligrams]. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE . for 7 Days THEN Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day related to MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE . The physician's order was discontinued on 9/24/25.A physician's order dated 9/24/25, documented DULoxetine HCl Capsule Delayed Release…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures on prohibiting and preventing abuse and investigating any such allegations. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, staff were aware of allegations of roughness during care but did not escalate the allegation up the chain of command to be investigated as a possible allegation of abuse. Resident identifier: 46. Findings included:Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fibromyalgia, alcoholic cirrhosis, hepatic failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and chronic pain syndrome.On 6/22/26 at 9:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 46. Resident 46 stated that a staff member previously provided rough care during a brief change and persisted despite resident 46's request to stop. Resident 46 stated that this staff member was no longer allowed to work with her. Resident 46 stated that she did not want to disclose the staff member's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not document in the resident's medical record the information that was provided to the receiving provider which must include a minimum of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; the resident representative contact information; advanced directive information; comprehensive care plan; a copy of the resident discharge summary; and all necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, for 2 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not document in the resident's medical record the information conveyed to the receiving provider when the resident was transferred to the Emergency Room. Resident identifiers: 18 and 54.Findings included:1. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of asthma, pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. On 6/22/26 at 11:48 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident's tube feeding was labeled with an incorrect formula, an incorrect administration rate, and was not labeled with the initials of the nurse who initiated the infusion. Furthermore, additional tube feedings were missing required labeling information. Resident identifier: 3.Findings included:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, altered mental status, type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase.A review of resident 3's physician orders revealed:a. On 6/3/26, an order for Enteral Feed Order every 24 hours for enteral feed administer Jevity 1.5 at 60 ml [milliliters] continuously.b. On 6/9/26, an order for Enteral Feed Order every day and night shift Flush feeding tube with 100 cc [cubic centimeter] of water q…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, a resident did not receive bathing assistance per their schedule. Resident identifier 46. Findings included:Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fibromyalgia, alcoholic cirrhosis, hepatic failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and chronic pain syndrome.On 6/22/26 at 9:58 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 46. Resident 46 stated she had not had a bed bath in a week. Resident 46 stated that she required 2 staff to assist with bathing cares and the staff had reported not having enough time to complete the task. Resident 46 stated she was supposed to have bed baths 3 times a week and she had been provided one bed bath in the last 2 weeks. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 2 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident left the facility and called his daughter to report he was lost and a week later another resident, who needed to be supervised during a Leave of Absence, left the facility. Resident identifiers: 29 and 110.Findings included:1. Resident 110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 3/27/26 and readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on 6/2/26 with diagnoses which included depression, alcohol dependence, and history of transient ischemic attack. The facility reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 5/22/26 at 11:32 AM, that resident 110 took an uber to get a haircut and called his daughter because he did not know how to get back on 5/14/26 at 11:35 AM. The daughter called the facility and they went and picked him up. It should be noted the incident happened on 5/21/26, not 5/14/26 as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 56% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT