Monument Healthcare Murray Creek
3855 South 700 East, Millcreek, UT 84106 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 184 certified beds · (801) 268-4766 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $81,468 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-28)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 65% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.5% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 3.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.5% | 16.5% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.2% | 15.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 25.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 3.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 21.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 0.9% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.7% | 91.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.1% | 16.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.0% | 11.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.43 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.4%CMS range 51.9–69.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.4%CMS range 5.8–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 2.9–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 184 beds and averages 113.1 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for one of one resident reviewed for accidents (Resident #11). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift sling was in safe, functional condition, resulting in a strap breakage during a transfer. This failure caused Resident #11 to fall, resulting in a 1cm scalp laceration and severe pain (9/10).The facility's noncompliance was determined to be Past Noncompliance. The facility developed and implemented a corrective action plan on August 26, 2025, which included staff retraining on mechanical lift competencies, disposal and replacement of all slings, and verification of interventions prior to the start of the survey on March 30, 2026. Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed that Resident 11 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. Review of a facility Incident Report dated August 5, 2025 revealed that while two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were transferring Resident #11 from the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2025-06-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from verbal and sexual abuse by a resident. Residents #33, #71, and #351 all reported they felt threatened and/or uncomfortable around Resident #346, a resident who was know to display sexually inappropriate behaviors. The facility further failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from physical abuse by staff. On 02/14/2025, Registered Nurse (RN) #9 willfully and intentionally yanked a walker from Resident #402, which caused the resident to fall to the floor. Resident #402 sustained a 2-inch goose egg to the forehead and bruised knees. The facility substantiated that abuse occurred and terminated the employment of RN #9. These deficient practices affected 4 (Residents #33, #71, #351, and #402) of 20 sampled residents.The undated facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, indicated It is the policy of this community to provide each resident with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that 1 out of 9 sampled residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident who was assessed as being a high risk for falls did not have interventions in place to prevent falls. The resident had a fall and sustained a maxillary fracture. Resident identifier: 3. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 9/13/23 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, ataxia, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, type 2 diabetes mellitus, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, insomnia, nausea, heartburn, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and depression. Resident 3's medical record was reviewed. Resident 3 had a fall risk evaluation form completed on 9/1/23 that documented that resident 3 was assessed at being at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was provided the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for medication administration, one nurse failed to follow professional standards for medication identification, resulting in the administration of two medications (Lorazepam and Carvedilol) to the wrong resident (Resident #1).The facility's noncompliance was determined to be Past Noncompliance. The facility developed and implemented a corrective action plan on August 13, 2025, which included staff education on the five rights of medication administration, skills competency check-offs, and internal monitoring to ensure no further errors occurred. The survey team verified these interventions were completed prior to the survey start date of March 30, 2026. A review of facility incident reports on March 30, 2026 revealed an entry dated July 21, 2025 involving Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-28 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were afforded 30 days to revoke their signed binding arbitration agreement for 3 (Residents #62, #78, and #82) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration.The facility Binding Arbitration Agreement with a copyright date of 2024, indicated 9. Revocation: This Agreement may be revoked by the Resident by written notice mailed to the Administrator of the Facility, using certified mail with return receipt requested, within ten (10) days after the date hereof, and if not revoked shall govern all aspects of the relationship between Facility and Resident upon and after the date of the Agreement.1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #62 on 05/19/2023.Resident #62's undated Binding Arbitration Agreement signed by the resident and the printed name of the Dietary Manager indicated, 9. Revocation: This Agreement may be revoked by the Resident by written notice mailed to the Administrator of the Facility, using certified mail with return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-28 · tag F0848 — widespreadProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were afforded an arbitration venue convenient to both parties for 3 (Residents #62, #78, and #82) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration.The facility Binding Arbitration Agreement with a copyright date of 2024, revealed no evidence to indicate for the selection of an arbitration venue that was convenience to both parties.1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #62 on 05/19/2023.Resident #62's undated Binding Arbitration Agreement signed by the resident and the printed name of the Dietary Manager revealed no evidence to indicate for the selection of an arbitration venue that was convenience to both parties.2. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #78 on 06/22/2025.Resident #78's undated Binding Arbitration Agreement signed by the resident and the Medical Records Manager revealed no evidence to indicate for the selection of an arbitration venue that was convenience to both parties.3. An admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-28 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) meetings were conducted and the facility maintained a list of staff who were present/participated in the quarterly QAPI meetings. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility.A facility policy titled, QAPI Program, with a copyright date of 2024, indicated, [Facility name] QAPI team shall meet at least quarterly to review all Quality Assurance Performance Improvement items.During an interview on 06/28/2025 at 11:50 AM, the Administrator the facility was recently purchased from another company, so the current administrative team had only had one QAPI meeting, which was in 03/2025. The Administrator reported he was not able to find documentation of the 03/2025 QAPI meeting, to include the list of attendees. According to the Administrator, the only evidence he had of QAPI meetings was the documentation listed in the QAPI binder.The facility binder titled QAPI-2024 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff were fit tested annually. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during the provision of dialysis for 1 (Resident #82) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility further failed to ensure staff cleaned and stored respiratory equipment for 1 (Resident #40) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.1. During an interview on 06/26/2025 at 3:20 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for fit tests.An undated document published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, indicated How Often Must Fit Testing Be Conducted? In addition to fit testing upon initially selecting a model of respirator, OSHA [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] requires that fit testing be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report to the state survey agency an allegation of abuse and further failed to submit their completed investigation to the state survey agency within five working days for 1 (Resident #402) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The facility further failed to report allegations of abuse to the state survey agency that involved 3 (Residents #33, #71, and #351) of 20 sampled residents.Findings included: The undated facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, indicated VII. External Reporting of Potential Abuse 1. Initial Reporting of Allegations Any allegations of abuse will be reported to the Administrator immediately and to the State Department of Health and the resident's representative immediately but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury. The policy specified, 2. Five-day Final Abuse Investigation Report - Within five working days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thorough investigate allegations of abuse that involved 4 (Residents #33, #71, #351, and #402) of 20 sampled residents.Findings included: The undated facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, indicated 4 Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigator will, at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical records or other documents. Residents to whom the accused has regularly provided care, and employees with whom the accused has regularly worked, will be interviewed to determine whether anyone has witnessed any prior abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of property by the accused individual. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #402 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-28 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #58) of 5 residents observed for medication administration were assessed to be able to safely self-administer their medication before a nurse left medication at the resident's bedside.A facility policy titled, Medications: Administering Medications, dated 02/01/2024, indicated, 27. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely.An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #58 on 05/21/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of spinal stenosis of the lumbar region, low back pain, and age-related osteoporosis.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/27/2025, revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the care and treatment of a resident with a left hand contracture for 1 (Resident #47) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for position, mobility.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Rehabilitative/Restorative Care: Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, dated 02/01/2024, revealed 4. The care plan will be developed by the interdisciplinary team based on the comprehensive assessment, and will be revised as needed. 5. The care plan will include specific interventions, exercises and therapies to maintain, prevent avoidable decline, and/or improve mobility and range of motion. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 on 12/16/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction left non-dominant side. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) on 05/26/2025, revealed Resident #47 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene care to 1 (Resident #399) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs).Findings included: A facility policy titled, Personal Care: Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, dated 02/01/2024, indicated, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #399 on 06/04/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of need or assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/2025, revealed Resident #399 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 (Resident #399) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for activities with an activity calendar and further failed to ensure staff provided the resident with activities of their choice.Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #399 on 06/04/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of need or assistance with personal care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/2025, revealed Resident #399 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated it was very important for the resident to be around animals such as pets. Resident #399's Care Plan Report included a focus area initiated 06/04/2025, that indicated the resident was a new admission adjusting to the facility. Interventions directed the staff to post an activity calendar in the resident's room, invite the resident to leisure diversionary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and services to increase a range of motion (ROM) in their left hand contracture for 1 (Resident #47) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for position, mobility.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Rehabilitative/Restorative Care: Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, dated 02/01/2024, revealed 2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 on 12/16/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction left non-dominant side. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) on 05/26/2025, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nursing staff documented the refusal of medication for 1 (Resident #97) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. The facility further failed to ensure the licensed nursing staff documented why medication was not administered to 1 (Resident #82) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for insulin.1. A facility policy titled, Medication: Documentation of Medication Administration, dated 02/01/2024, indicated, A medication administration record [MAR] is used to document all medications administered. The policy specified, 2. Administration of medication is documented immediately after it is given. 3. Documentation of medication administration includes, as a minimum: a. the resident's name; b. name and strength of the drug; c. dosage; d. route of administration; e. date and time of administration; f. reason(s) why a medication was withheld, not administered, or refused (as applicable); g. initials, signature and title of the person administering the medication; h.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-28 · tag F0910 — isolatedEnsure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room provided enough space so that they could access their bathroom in a motorized wheelchair for 1 (Resident #15) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for the environment.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Rights/Dignity: Homelike Environment, dated 02/01/2024, revealed Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning dignity and well-being. The policy specified, 3. In order to accommodate individual needs and preferences, adaptations may be made to the physical environment, including the resident's bedroom and bathroom, as well as the common areas in the facility. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #14 on 11/22/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of complete traumatic amputation at level between right hip and knee, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, facility document review, and review of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff routinely monitored food temperatures on the meal service line. Specifically, the facility failed to take the temperatures of all food and drink items that required temperature control for safety to limit microorganism growth and failed to have temperature logs available on several days. This had the potential to affect 98 of 98 residents who received meals from the dietary department. Findings included: A review of the FDA's 2022 Food Code, Chapter 3 Food, revealed, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: (1) At 57 C [Celsius] (135 F [Fahrenheit]) or above or (2) At 5 C (41 F) or less. A review of a facility document titled, Resource: Food Temperature Log, revealed the Cold Holding Reference for milk was listed as less than 45 degrees F. A review of the Food Temperature Logs for the timeframe from 08/14/2023 to 08/28/2023 revealed the following concerns: - On 08/14/2023, no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents #33, #39, and #262) of 4 residents who were self-administering medications, were assessed to determine whether it was safe to self-administer the medications and to keep the medications at the bedside. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Right to Self-Administer Medication, last revised 05/04/2023, indicated, The resident has the right to self-administer medications, if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate. 1. If a resident has requested to self-administer medications, it is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team to determine it is safe before the resident exercises the right. A resident may self-administer medications after the interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered. 2. Considerations in determining if the resident is clinically appropriate to self-administer include: a. Which medications are appropriate and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. Review of a facility policy titled, Quality of Care: Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, revised on 05/04/2023, revealed, The resident's care plan will reflect the extent of supervision, if any, is needed during smoking. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #96 on 06/01/2023 with a diagnosis that included hypertension. The admission Record included a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia with an onset date of 08/25/2023. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/06/2023 revealed Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The resident required staff supervision for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #96's Progress Notes revealed a note, dated 06/01/2023 at 6:17 PM, that indicated Resident #96 was admitted to the facility and was a current some day smoker. The note indicated Resident #96 reported smoking sometimes with friends. On 08/28/2023 at 9:02 AM, 08/29/2023 at 9:55 AM, and 08/31/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide services to residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #44, #51, and #261) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. Specifically, Resident #44 and Resident #261 had long and dirty fingernails, Resident #51 and Resident #261 had facial hair that needed to be trimmed, and Resident #261 had debris around their mouth. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/ Maintain Abilities, revised 05/04/2023, indicated, Facility provides necessary care and services to support the resident's needs and choices. Further review revealed, 1. A resident is given appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his/her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including those specified below: a. hygiene-bathing, grooming, dressing, oral care. Additionally, 2. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: 1) ensure cigarettes and lighters were stored safely at the nursing station for 3 (Residents #38, #44, and #96) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking; 2) complete a smoking assessment for 1 (Resident #96) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking in accordance with the facility's policy; and 3) ensure 2 (Resident #61 and Resident #47) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards were safely transferred and/or transported. Staff failed to utilize a gait belt during a stand and pivot transfer for Resident #61 and failed to utilize footrests while transporting Resident #61 and Resident #47 in their wheelchairs. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility policy titled, Physical Environment Facility with Independent and Supervised Smokers, revised 05/04/2023, indicated, 3. Residents who wish to smoke will be assessed for smoking safety by nursing. 4. Smoking assessments will be completed on admission, quarterly, with significant change of condition and as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for 4 (Residents #33, #39, #97, and #262) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure there was a physician order for the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways opened during sleep) for Resident #97 and Resident #262; 2) store Resident #33's nebulizer mask when not in use; and 3) store the CPAP equipment for Resident #39 when not use. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Care Respiratory Care/Tracheostomy Care & Suctioning, revised 05/04/2023, specified Purpose: To provide residents with necessary respiratory care and services that are in accordance with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan and the resident's choice. The policy specified, 9. Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) refers to apnea…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to submit a final investigative report within the required five working days to the state survey agency for 1 (Resident #13) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Abuse Reporting and Responsibilities of Covered Individuals, revised on 05/04/2023, revealed, 5. In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility will: a. Report immediately, but not later than 2 hours, all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. b. Report immediately, but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. The policy further indicated, d. The facility will report results of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 (Resident #262) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings included: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, specified, The admission assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a new resident and, under some circumstances, a returning resident that must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the nursing home as day if: - this is the resident's first time in this facility, OR, - the resident has been admitted to this facility and was discharged return not anticipated, OR - the resident has been admitted to this facility and was discharged return anticipated and did not return within 30 days of discharge. A review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment, revised on 05/04/2023, indicated, The facility will conduct an initial and periodic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #44 on 07/28/2017 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy and generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 07/02/2023, revealed the date the assessment was completed was 08/18/2023, which was beyond the required 14 days after the ARD. During an interview on 08/30/2023 at 4:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she expected MDSs to be completed timely per the RAI manual. During an interview on 08/30/2023 at 4:36 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated she had worked for the facility for about three weeks. She stated the facility had not had an MDS Coordinator temporarily, so some MDSs were not completed timely. During an interview on 08/31/2023 at 4:13 PM with the Administrator, he confirmed Resident #44's quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 07/02/2023, was completed late, and he expected MDSs to be completed on time. 2. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #13 on 11/20/2019 with diagnoses that included dysarthria following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for 2 (Residents #58 and #76) of 27 sampled residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #58's 06/06/2023 quarterly MDS assessment did not address the resident's cognitive status, and Resident #76's 04/04/2023 quarterly MDS assessment did not address the resident's fall with major injury. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Assessment, revised 05/04/2023, specified, The facility will conduct an initial and periodic comprehensive, accurate assessment of a resident's functional capacity which will include needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences utilizing the RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument]. The assessments will be reproducible, transmitted to CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] and will be in accordance with the timeframes identified in the RAI regulations specified by CMS. 1. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #58 on 05/02/2019 with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure procedures for receiving medication for residents was accurate and safe for 1 (Resident #96) of 7 residents reviewed for medications. Specifically, the facility placed medication found in Resident #96's backpack labeled as Methadone in the medication cart to be administered to the resident, even though the resident stated the medication in the bottles was ibuprofen. Findings included: An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/30/2023 at 4:11 PM, revealed the facility had no policy regarding how to address residents bringing medications into the facility. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident #96 on 06/01/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of Resident #96's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/06/2023, revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 2 (Residents #11 and Resident #83) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse prohibition. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 05/04/2023, indicated, 3. When the facility has identified abuse, the facility should take appropriate steps to remediate the noncompliance and protect residents from additional abuse immediately. This includes but is not limited to: c. Conduct a thorough investigation of the allegation. Review of a facility policy, titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Preventing and Prohibiting Abuse, revised 05/04/2023, specified, Investigation 1. Allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation will be investigated, including: c. Identifying and interviewing involved persons, witnesses, and others who may have knowledge to the extent possible. and e. Documenting the investigation. A review of Resident #11's admission Record indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, foods in the resident communal refrigerators were not labeled, dated or disposed of when past expiration dates, also at the time of observation the facility dish machine was used without insurance of adequate sanitizer levels. Findings included: 1. On 12/2/21 observations were made of resident communal refrigerators located on the nursing units. The following observations were made; a. On 12/2/21 at 10:18 AM, the resident communal refrigerator on a nursing unit was observed to include the following items; i. A plastic grocery bag was observed labeled with a resident name and not labeled with a date. The bag contained a container with rice and a mango. ii. A bottle of blue cheese dressing was labeled Don't Throw- no name or date was labeled on the item. The food item was not passed the manufacturer's use by date. iii. A plastic bag with illegible writing contained a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, while exercising reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft, and providing housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, resident interviews and observations were performed regarding uncleanly conditions in a resident communal shower room, and for 2 of 49 sample residents the facility did not ensure residents had reasonable protection of property from loss or theft. Resident identifiers: 11, 45, 60, 74. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, multiple myeloma, anxiety disorder, cognitive communication disorder, hyperlipidemia, asthma, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), malignant neoplasm of the bone, history of fracture to the left tibia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 4 of 49 sample residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, one resident with difficulty communicating was not provided a communication book for staff to communicate with her, pressure ulcers were not noted, and pain was not addressed. Resident identifiers: 18, 34, 45 and 70. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a cognitive communication deficit, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chest pain, insomnia, and dementia. Resident 18 speaks Russian. On 11/30/21 at 8:55 AM, resident 18 was observed outside her room requesting help from staff in Russian. A Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined for 2 of 49 sampled residents that the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Specifically, a dependent resident was observed to go nearly 2 hours without being provided incontinence care or responded to by staff, and another dependent resident's scheduled bathing did not occur multiple times. Resident identifier: 8 and 67. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory failure, type II diabetes mellitus, type I neurofibromatosis, and chronic kidney disease. On 11/30/21 a continuous observation of Resident 8 began at 12:07 PM and ended at 1:30 PM. During the continued observation the resident was observed to appear disheveled, unshaved, and malodorous. Resident 8 was also observed to be wearing a soiled brief. Resident 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 49 sample residents. Specifically, a resident had multiple falls without interventions, and one resident was run into by a meal cart. Resident identifiers: 18 and 60. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a cognitive communication deficit, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chest pain, insomnia, and dementia. Resident 18 speaks Russian. On 11/30/21 at 8:55 AM, resident 18 was observed outside her room requesting help from staff in Russian. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed directing resident 18 back to her room. CNA 1 was immediately interviewed. CNA 1 stated that she did not speak Russian, but she could usually understand what resident 18 needed because resident 18 would point to things in her room. CNA 1 stated that resident 18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment, for 4 of 49 sample residents. Specifically, residents were required to wait for care in excess of an hour, and staffing levels prohibited proper infection control practices. Disinfectant was also not being provided to the laundry. Resident identifiers: 8, 60, 67, and 78. Findings include: 1. Resident 60 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, fibromyalgia, bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, as well as, food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 6 of 49 sample residents. Specifically, multiple residents complained of food that was not palatable or of appropriate temperature, resident council minutes revealed complaints of food, and the test tray was not attractive or palatable. Resident identifiers: 5, 10, 45, 54, 60, 97. 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included, but not limited to, paraplegia, hemiplegia, morbid obesity, dysphagia, mood disorder, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, and hyper glycemia. On 11/29/21 at 12:00 PM, resident 10 stated the food on their meal trays were often cold. Resident 10 stated when they ordered an alternate meal of a hamburger,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not establish and maintain an IPCP designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, staff were observed to transport resident beverages uncovered through nursing units during meal delivery, PPE was not maintained for an outbreak, face masks were not disinfected adequately, sputum was left on the sidewalk, and cleaning rooms after residents were diagnosed with COVID-19 did not occur timely. Findings Include: 1. On 12/1/21 at 8:21 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 9 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 13 were observed in room with droplet and contact precautions. RN 9 and CNA 13 were observed handling bedding and the resident's belongings, and performing resident cares without wearing gowns. 2. On 12/1/21 at 8:33 AM, a Central Supply (CS) employee was observed making a bed in a room on contact precautions without wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not conduct COVID-19 testing based on the criteria for conducting testing of asymptomatic individuals such as the positivity rate of COVID-19 in a county. Specifically, unvaccinated staff were not tested twice a week when the county positivity rate was High >10%) and during the facility's outbreak. This occurred for 4 out of 5 sampled staff members. Finding include: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Memo QSO-20-38-NH, revised on 4/27/21, reads, Routine testing of unvaccinated staff should be based on the extent of the virus in the community. Fully vaccinated staff do not have to be routinely tested. Facilities should use their county positivity rate in the prior week as the trigger for staff testing frequency. [Community COVID-19 activity is High when the county positivity rate in the past week was >10% and minimum testing frequency of unvaccinated staff is twice a week. The Salt Lake County transmission rates used to determine the frequency for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. Specifically, a resident was not given a bed with a frame that would allow the resident to elevate her legs and feet. This occurred for 1 of 49 sample residents. Resident Identifier: 83. Findings include: Resident 83 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, chronic pain, difficulty walking, hypokalemia, pseudobulbar affect, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, psychosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, and seizures. On 11/29/21 at 12:59 PM, resident 83 was observed awake lying flat on her back in bed. An interview was conducted with resident 83. Resident 83 stated she stays in her bed all day and that the lower part of her bed frame was not functioning. Resident 83 stated she wanted a bed where she could raise and lower her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure a resident had the right to request, refuse, or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive. Specifically, for 1 of 49 sample residents, the facility did not provide the resident with the right to have her advanced directives honored due to lack of lack of accessible Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for nursing staff review. Resident identifier: 60. Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, fibromyalgia, bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. On [DATE] at 1:05 PM, a review of resident 60's chart began in order to locate resident 60's advanced directives. Resident 60's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) did not include a copy of resident 60's POLST. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated there was a binder on each unit with a hard copy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined, for 6 of 49 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure the prompt resolution of grievances. Additionally, the grievances completed by the resident council were not resolved. Resident identifiers: 3, 28, 45, 54, 60, and 75. Findings include: 1. The resident council meeting minutes for the previous three months were reviewed. Concerns and grievances included: a. missing laundry, misplaced laundry, slow laundry b. cold food, small serving sizes c. inadequate staffing Additional residents had complaints about the food: a. I can only describe it as brown. b. I wouldn't feed it to my dog. Additional residents had complaints about missing clothing: a. Missing 49ers jersey 2. On 12/2/21 at 4:21 PM, resident 28 was interviewed. Resident 28 stated that when laundry was marked and sent to be washed, there were many items that never returned. Resident 28 stated that the issues had not been resolved. Resident 28 stated that she attended resident council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide, for 1 of 49 sample residents, with appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, one resident was provided with assistance as needed for mobility and communication. Resident identifiers: 18. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a cognitive communication deficit, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chest pain, insomnia, and dementia. Resident 18 speaks Russian. On 11/30/21 at 8:55 AM, resident 18 was observed outside her room requesting help from staff in Russian. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed directing resident 18 back to her room. CNA 1 was immediately interviewed. CNA 1 stated that she did not speak Russian, but she could usually understand what resident 18 needed because resident 18 would point to things in her room. CNA 1 stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 49 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choice. Specifically, one resident's physician order for physical, speech and occupational therapies were not implemented. Resident identifiers: 70. Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, encephalopathy, dysarthria, anarthria, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, sepsis, bacterial infection, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, spina bifida, and morbid obesity. On 12/1/21 resident 70's medical record was reviewed. A care plan dated 5/3/21 had a focus of limited physical mobility r/t (related to) neurological deficits and weakness. A goal dated 9/29/21 that resident will demonstrate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 49 sample residents. Specifically, one resident admitted with two pressure ulcers received additional pressure ulcers which progressed to stage IV with osteomyelitis (bone infection) that required intravenous antibiotics. Resident identifier: 97. Findings include: Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type II diabetes, pressure ulcers of the sacral region and heel, obesity, cognitive communication deficit, a urostomy, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, sepsis, disease of the spinal cord, and paraplegia. Subsequent to admission, resident 97 was diagnosed with reduced mobility, COVID-19, a colostomy, tremor, abnormal involuntary movements, and dehydration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible and did not offer a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem and the health care provider ordered a therapeutic diet. Specifically, Resident 67 did not have nutritional orders implemented or followed. Resident identifier: 67. Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: paraplegia, sacral pressure ulcers, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Findings include: On 11/29/21 at 10:30 AM an interview was conducted with Resident 67. Resident 67 stated that he had doctor's orders for Ensure brand protein drink, specifically, the Ensure Max Protein variety. Resident 67 said I need all the protein…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that for 1 of 49 sample residents that the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to a resident consistent with professional standards, and the resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, a resident reported he had asked to have his pain medication administration times spread out throughout the day to alleviate his pain and this was not done. Resident identifier 45. Findings included: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included, emphysema, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, fracture of lumbar vertebra, lumbago with sciatica, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic pain, type II diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic hear disease. On 11/29/21 at 11:43 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 45. Resident 45 stated he had tried to get his pain medication times spread out because the medication did not work to control his pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure that each drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 49 sample residents. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose; excessive duration; without adequate monitoring; without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Specifically, a resident's insulin was not administered according to physician's orders. Resident identifiers: 70. Findings include: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on 5/321 then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, encephalopathy, dysarthria, anarthria, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, sepsis, bacterial infection, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, spina bifida, and morbid obesity. On 12/1/21 resident 70's medical record was reviewed. Physician orders revealed the following medication:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store drugs and biologicals under proper temperature. Specifically two of four medication room refrigerators' temperatures were out the safe refrigerated storage temperature range of 36 degrees to 46 degrees Fahrenheit. Findings include: On 12/6/21 four medication rooms in the facility were sampled to inspect if drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately. There was a locked medication refrigerator in each of the four medication rooms. Near each medication refrigerator, was a Refrigerator Temperatures Log. Inside each refrigerator there were multiple medications and a thermometer. 1. Royal Front Medication Room: The medication refrigerator was clean, organized and the temperature in the refrigerator was within the safe refrigerated storage temperature range of 36 degrees to 46 degrees Fahrenheit. 2. Royal Back Medication Room: The medication refrigerator was clean, organized and the temperature in the refrigerator was within the safe refrigerated storage temperature range of 36 degrees to 46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure each resident received drinks, including water and other liquids, consistent with the residents' needs and preferences to maintain resident hydration. Specifically, for 1 of the sample 49 residents, a resident with a physician order for thickened liquids was provided with thin, regular consistency water at meal time and during the day. Resident identifier: 22. Findings include: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included, but not limited to, dysphagia, respiratory failure, multiple sclerosis, cognitive communication deficit, seizures, contracture of muscle, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. On 12/1/21 at 12:32 PM, an observation of tray line was made. Dietary Aide 1 plated beverages onto meal trays for service. On the lunch tray for resident 22, no beverage was supplied. At 12:42 PM, Dietary Aide 2 stated thickened liquids were sent on the trays for residents who required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included, emphysema, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, fracture of lumbar vertebra, lumbago with sciatica, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic pain, type II diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic hear disease. On 11/29/21 at 1143 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 45. Resident 45 stated he had tried to get his pain medication times spread out because they do not work to control his pain all day. Resident 45 stated he went to the pain clinic last week and the pain clinic recommended resident 45's pain medications be changed but nothing has happened. Resident 45 medical record was reviewed on 12/1/21. Resident 45 did not have scanned Pain Clinic paperwork from his appointment. Physician's orders were reviewed and the following were documented: a. On 10/26/21 referral to pain clinic. On 10/28/21 at 1:40 PM, a Physician progress note documented, Often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$81,468 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $73,320 — penalty dated 2025-06-28
- $8,148 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MURRAY, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2018 |
| HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| CLAWSON, TRAVIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| ESPINOSA, STEPHANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| FRAGOSO, LINDSAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| GANGOTENA-BERNARD, FATIMA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| MARRIOTT, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| ROBERTSON, BRETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| SAMUELIAN, SPENCER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| SEASTRAND, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| THAP, RENUKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| WEST, CHRISTIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| WILSON, BRENT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| MONUMENT HEALTH PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
| MONUMENT REAL ESTATE MURRAY CREEK LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $9.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 65% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465094. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.