Monument Healthcare Brigham City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Specifically, for 1 out of 27 sampled residents, staff were unable to locate a resident for a period of time. There was an area of the facility that was locked an unaccessable to staff. There was a facility staff member in the locked area that the resident was observed to exit from. The resident made statements that the staff member engaged in sexual actions with her. In addition, the staff member had been talked to about not remaining in the facility after dinner time. This example was cited at Immediate Jeopardy. Resident identifiers: 4, 6, 12, 23, 28, 31, 36, 90 and 141. Findings included: Notice: On 4/11/24 at 12:15 PM, Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommended practices to prevent various forms of abuse. Notice of the IJ was given…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 out of 13 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure residents had a right to be free from neglect. Specifically, a resident was left in a wet brief for an extended period of time and sustained a rash and excoriation to the groin. This resulted in a finding of harm for the resident. Resident identifier: 9.Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, unspecified urinary incontinence, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, and cognitive communication deficit.Resident 9's medical record was reviewed on 12/3/25.On 3/13/25 at 10:00 PM, a progress note documented, Oncoming aides rounded on resident and discovered excoriated peri-area [perineum] with a split open area at the left waist approx [approximately] 3 inches long. There is also an area on her left shoulder that appears to be a rash approx 4x 4 without any open areas.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2020-02-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 24 sample residents, the facility did not ensure that residents' drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued; or any combinations of the reasons above. Specifically, a resident receiving anti-coagulation medication did not receive timely monitoring and was subsequently hospitalized . In addition, a resident who was supposed to receive a taper of medication did not receive this in a timely manner. Resident identifier: 88. This deficiency was cited at past non-compliance. The facility, upon determining that a lab had been missed and a resident was hospitalized , determined the cause of the missed lab. They put a Four Step action plan into place, including audits, staff education,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that pain management services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals. Specifically, a nurse failed to timely assess and administer a prescribed as-needed (PRN) opioid pain medication to a resident experiencing pain after repeated requests from the resident and alerts from multiple certified nursing assistants (CNAs). The resident experienced pain, which was described by the resident as agony, for more than four hours. Resident identifier: 33. Findings included:Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Muscular Dystrophy, Unspecified; Other Specified Disorders of Teeth and Supporting Structures; Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Moderate; Unspecified Dementia, Moderate, Without Behavioral Disturbance; and Personality Disorder, Unspecified. On 6/29/26 at 9:28 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the dish machine washing temperature was not manufacture required temperature and there were no sanitizer strips available to test the solution. Findings included: 1. On 4/8/24 at 9:03 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observation was made of the dish machine [Note: All temperatures were in degrees Fahrenheit.] a. The washing temperature was 110 and the rinse temperature was 120. There were 11 plates, five cups, one dessert dish, and a lid that were in the dish machine. An observation was made of the Dietary Manager (DM) replacing the dishes with the clean dishes. b. The washing temperature was 110 and the rinse temperature was 120. The dish machine basket had seven trays in it and were replaced with clean dishes. An interview was immediately conducted with the DM. The DM stated the dish machine was between 100 and 200 degrees and was usually over 140. The DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment. Specifically, there were odors throughout the facility. Findings included: On 4/8/24 at 8:57 AM, an observation was made in the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a strong urine odor. On 4/8/24 from 11:45 AM to 11:52 AM, an observation was made in the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a strong urine odor. On 4/9/24 at 9:08 AM, an observation was made in the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a strong urine, bowel movement, and body odor through the hallway. On 4/9/24 at 11:54 AM, an observation was made in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] and into the dining room. There was a strong urine odor. On 4/9/24 at 12:04 PM, an observation was made in the dining room and the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a strong urine odor. On 4/10/24 at 7:40 AM, an observation was made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, for 4 out of 27 sampled resident, residents complained of food quality and a test tray was bland. Resident identifiers: 4, 9, 15, and 27. Findings included: On 4/8/24 at 10:44 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 27. Resident 27 stated the food was unappealing and unappetizing. On 4/8/24 at 9:32 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 15. Resident 15 stated she was sensitive to spices and strong flavors. Resident 15 stated lately the food had been pretty spicy. Resident 15 stated most foods had peppers of some kind added to them. On 4/8/24 at 10:24 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 9. Resident 9 stated the food was not good and there were no substitutes. On 4/8/24 at 10:49 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 4. Resident 4 stated we need better food. Resident 4 stated she was not allowed to have more than four ounces of juice per day. On 4/9/24 at 12:24 PM, an observation was made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a suitable, nourishing alternate meals and snacks for residents wanting to eat at non-traditional times, or outside of scheduled meal service times. Specifically, for 5 out of 27 sampled residents, residents were only offered saltine crackers for snacks. Resident identifiers: 3, 4, 6, 31, and 141. Findings included: On 4/8/24 at 9:00 AM and 2:30 PM, an observation was made of a container at the south nurses station. There were saltine crackers in the container. On 4/8/24 at 9:15 AM and 2:35 PM, an observation was made of a container at the north nurses station. There were saltine cracker in the container and one of the saltine crackers was open to air. On 4/9/24 at 9:30 AM, an observation was made of the north nurses station. There were saltine crackers in a container on the counter and one of the saltine crackers was open to air. On 4/9/24 at 2:00 PM and 4:00 PM, an observation was made at the south nurses station. There were saltine crackers in a container on the counter. On 4/10/24 at 12:33 PM, an observation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement written polices and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents. Specifically, a staff member was not connected to the facility through the Direct Access Clearance System (DACS). Findings included: Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) 1's employee file was reviewed on 4/10/24. The file revealed an offer letter for another facility. There was no information regarding PTA 1 being employed with the facility being surveyed. The information provided was from a contract rehabilitation company. On 4/9/24 at 4:17 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated prior to a staff member working with residents a background screening was completed. The Administrator stated PTA 1 had a background screening completed and there were no problems. On 4/11/24 at 9:08 AM, an interview was conducted with the Background Processing Manager (BPM) at the State Survey Agency. The BPM checked PTA 1 in the DACS. The BPM stated that PTA 1 was eligible for work…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental, and psychosocial needs. Specifically, for 1 out of 27 sampled residents, a resident did not have an intervention implemented from his care plan which resulted in multiple falls, a skin tear, and hip pain. Resident Identifier: 9. Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, surgical amputation, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident 9's medical record was reviewed on 4/9/24. A review of Resident 9's care plan initiated on 2/20/24, showed that the resident is at risk for falls and has had an actual fall r/t [related to] gait/balance problems. Resident 9's care plan was revised on 3/6/24, with interventions to include a bed change to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 27 sampled residents, a resident did not have an assistance device to prevent falls which resulted in multiple falls. Resident Identifier: 9. Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but not limited to, surgical amputation, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident 9's medical record was reviewed on 4/9/24. A review of Resident 9's care plan initiated on 2/20/24, showed that the resident is at risk for falls and has had an actual fall r/t [related to] gait/balance problems. Resident 9's care plan was revised on 3/6/24, with interventions to include a bed change to a bariatric bed. On 3/6/24 at 6:33 AM, a Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-27 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not conduct comprehensive assessments of residents in accordance with the timeframe's specified. Specifically, for 3 out of 31 sampled residents, comprehensive assessments of residents were not completed at least once every 12 months. Resident identifiers: 13, 90, and 91. Findings included: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include polyosteoarthritis, contracture of muscle, anoxic brain damage, muscle wasting and atrophy, fistula of stomach and duodenum, and adult failure to thrive. On 6/23/22, resident 13's medical record was reviewed. Resident 13's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was reviewed, and it was revealed that the target date for completion of the most recent annual MDS assessment was 4/7/22. The annual MDS assessment was not completed, and the status was marked as In Progress. 2. Resident 91 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-27 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not assess residents using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services not less frequently than once every 3 months. Specifically, for 13 out of 31 sampled residents, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were not completed every 3 months. In addition, quarterly MDS assessments were not completed no later than 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD). Resident identifiers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 16, 26, 30, 89, 90, and 142. Findings included: 1. Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute osteomyelitis, iron deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis. On 6/23/22, resident 89's medical record was reviewed. Resident 89's quarterly MDS assessment was reviewed, and it was revealed that the ARD target date for completion of the quarterly MDS assessment was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,166 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,166 — penalty dated 2025-12-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 55% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT