Monument Healthcare Millcreek
1201 East 4500 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84117 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (801) 261-3664 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.9% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.4% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.6% | 16.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.5% | 15.1% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.5% | 25.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 3.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.6% | 21.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.5% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 0.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 91.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.6% | 16.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.23 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.27 | 1.43 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 183 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.5%CMS range 61.7–73.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.1%CMS range 6.6–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.9–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 84.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of displaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower extremity, displaced avulsion fracture of right talus, chronic pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, kidney transplant status, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, fistula of the intestine, contusion of the abdominal wall, dyspnea, disorders of phosphorus metabolism, and hypokalemia. On 1/20/26 through 1/21/26 resident 2's medical records were reviewed. On 10/29/25, resident 2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. On 10/24/25, resident 2's physician ordered TPN 1600 milliliter (ml) to run continuously in the evening per the pharmacy instructions. The pharmacy order summary documented the following for resident 2's TPN:Start Volume - 100 mlStart Rate - 62.5 ml/hour (hr.)Start Period - 1.6 hrs.Run Volume - 1600 mlRun Rate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, related to pain management. Specifically 1 of 4 residents sampled, was hospitalized due to opiate toxicity. Resident Identifier: 4 Findings Included: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and calculus of kidney. Review of resident 4's medical record was completed on 1/21/26. On 1/1/26 at 10:47 AM, a Physician's Progress Admit Note for resident 4 revealed that a medication reconciliation was done with the patient's family and his primary care physician's records. Morphine tablets (immediate release, 7.5 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours as needed), were ordered for resident 4's dorsalgia. On 1/2/26 at 1:49 PM, a Medical Doctor (MD) History and Physical Note for resident 4 stated, Patient with large kidney stones. Patient complains of ongoing pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was defined as any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences. Specifically, for 3 out of 37 sampled residents, 2 of the residents' blood pressure medications were administered outside of the physician's ordered parameters and the third resident was not given an ordered medication as scheduled. Resident identifier: 26, 28, and 146.1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and atrial fibrillation. Resident 26's medical record was reviewed on 11/17/25 through 11/20/25. On 12/18/24, Metoprolol Tartrate oral tablet was ordered for hypertension, with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility was not adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff area for toilet facilities. Specifically, the facility had seven public bathrooms that were accessible by residents and were not equipped with a call light system. On 11/20/25, an observation was made of the public bathroom facilities. The 300 hallway bathroom near room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed and did not contain a call light inside. The 400 hallway bathroom near the nurse's station was observed and did not contain a call light inside. The bathroom next to the staff break room was observed and did not contain a call light inside. The bathroom next to the Human Resource office and front desk was observed and did not contain a call light inside. None of the public bathrooms were locked. On 11/20/25 at 2:36 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 37 sampled residents, that the facility did not immediately inform or consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status or a need to alter treatment. Specifically, the physician was not notified when a resident's Trulicity was held. Resident identifiers: 28.Findings included:1. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare following amputation, Type 2 DM, and morbid obesity. On 11/18/25 9:37 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 28. Resident 28 stated that when she was first admitted she missed 3 weeks of injections of her Trulicity (Dulaglutide) medication. Resident 28 stated that the nurse had to re-order the medication and it delayed her injection. Resident 28's medical records were reviewed 11/17/25 through 11/20/25. On 9/3/25, resident 28's physician ordered Dulaglutide Subcutaneous Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, a resident was admitted with wounds and dressings on their bilateral feet and did not have wound care orders initiated until 9 days after admission. Resident identifier: 117.Resident 117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis due to bacteria of left ankle and foot, gout, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, pain, and edema. On 11/18/25 at 9:07 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 117. Resident 117 stated that he had both ankles surgically cleaned out and the left foot had MRSA. Resident 117 stated that he had 2 dressing changes completed since admission. Resident 117 stated that he was supposed to have dressing changes completed 3 times a week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident was free from any significant medication errors. Specifically, multiple doses of Vancomycin were omitted from the residents scheduled medication administration. Resident identifier: 117. Resident 117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis due to bacteria of left ankle and foot, gout, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, pain, and edema. On 11/18/25 at 8:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 117. Resident 117 stated that he had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in his right arm and had multiple daily doses of intravenous antibiotics. Resident 117 stated that he had 3 doses of Vancomycin that were missed by the facility. On 10/30/25, resident 117's physician ordered Vancomycin Hydrochloride (HCl) Solution Reconstituted, Use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 37 residents sampled, that the facility did not notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fell outside of the clinical reference ranges. Specifically, a resident's Vancomycin trough levels were high and the Medical Doctor (MD) was not notified of those high values. Resident identifier: 117.Resident 117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis due to bacteria of left ankle and foot, gout, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, pain, and edema. On 11/18/25 at 8:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 117. Resident 117 stated that he had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in his right arm and had multiple daily doses of intravenous antibiotics. Resident 117 stated that he had 3 doses of Vancomycin that were missed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 37 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated reports of radiological and other diagnostic services. Specifically, a resident 21's Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) was not in the medical records. Resident identifier 21. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, quadriplegia, spinal stenosis, and post-traumatic stress disorder.Review of resident 21's medical record was completed on 11/17/25 through 11/20/25.On 11/2/25, a physician's order documented an immediate (STAT) KUB radiograph (x-ray).On 11/2/25 at 12:48 pm, a nursing progress alert note stated the following: The patient decided to stay in bed all day today. The nurse noted that the patient's abdomen was blooded with a lot of gas and administered a gas pill. The patient stated that he had a watery bowel movement yesterday and last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 37 sampled residents, that the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, a resident was not placed on proper contact precautions. Resident Identifier: 117.Resident 117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis due to bacteria of left ankle and foot, gout, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, pain, and edema. On 11/18/25 at 8:55 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 117. Resident 117 stated that he had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in his right arm and had multiple daily doses of intravenous antibiotics. Resident 117 stated that he had both ankles surgically cleaned out and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 6 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 8 of 22 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible. Specifically, water temperatures in residents bathrooms were high. Resident identifiers: 2, 32, 33, 38, 45, 160, 307, and 309. Findings include: 1. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and delusional disorders. On 10/30/23 at 11:21 AM, an observation was made of resident 33's bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The water temperature in the hand washing sink was 122.4 degrees Fahrenheit. An interview was conducted with resident 33. Resident 33 stated that she did not use cold water when she washed her hand and got cold water from the kitchen. Resident 33's medical record was reviewed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that resident 33 Brief Interview of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 3 of 22 sampled residents, that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Specifically, the water pressure and temperature of a shared bathroom sink was low. Resident identifiers: 23, 42, and 51 Findings include: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, anemia, polyneuropathy, vitamin B12 deficiency, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, Wernicke's encephalopathy, dysuria, pain in left hip, panic disorder, and hallucinations. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, hyperkalemia, essential hypertension, sleep apnea, gout, anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, for 1 of 22 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that the Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental health disorder was performed by a person or entity other than the State Mental Health Authority prior to admission, and that because of the physical and mental condition of the individual, the individual required the level of services provided by the nursing facility, and whether the individual required specialized services. Specifically, a resident admitted with a mental health disorder did not have a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II recommended or completed. Resident identifier: 51. Findings include: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, schizophrenia and paranoid schizophrenia. On 9/15/23, a PASRR I was completed for resident 51. The psychiatric diagnosis documented that resident 51 had schizophrenia disorder. The PASRR I also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for 1 of 22 sampled residents, the facility did not provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and persona and oral hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, a resident was not showered twice weekly according to his preferences. Resident Identifier: 158. Findings Include: Resident 158 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes, acute kidney failure and major depressive disorder. On 10/30/23 at 10:18 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 158. Resident 158 stated he had only received one shower since his admission. Resident 158 stated he had not been offered a shower the day after he arrived. Resident 158 stated he would like at least 2 showers per week. Resident 158's medical record was reviewed between 10/30/23 and 11/2/23. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was reviewed once a month by the licensed pharmacist and any irregularities were reported to the physician and were acted upon. Specifically, monthly pharmacy reviews identified irregularities that had not been implemented. Resident identifiers: 2 and 8. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included palliative care, morbid obesity, edema, senile degeneration of brain, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right calf. Resident 8's medical record was reviewed 10/30/23 through 11/2/23. A form titled Consultation Report from the facility pharmacy dated 8/30/23. The form revealed that resident 8 had as needed physician's order that were not used within the previous 60 days. The medications were: 1. Miralax Packet 2. Milk of Magnesia 3. Fluticone nasal spray 50 mcg/act (PLEASE NOTE: this only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sampled resident, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, a resident was administered double the dose of physician prescribed Lasix. In addition, the resident had an elevated potassium level prior to being administered double to dose of lasix and there was no physician follow-up documented. Resident identifier: 8. Findings included: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included palliative care, morbid obesity, edema, osteoarthritis, senile degeneration of brain, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right calf. Resident 8's medical record was reviewed from 10/30/23 through 11/2/23. A physician's order dated 9/16/23 and discontinued on 9/24/23 revealed Lasix 40 milligrams (mg). The instructions were to give 1 tablet by mouth two time a day for edema. In addition, Lasix 40 mg po [orally] BID [twice daily] for three days then back to lasix…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILFORD AREA HEALTH CARE SERVICE DISTRICT #3 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2024 |
| MONUMENT HEALTH PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| MONUMENT REAL ESTATE MILLCREEK LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| DANSIE, GUY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| LANGFORD, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| MOSS, TYLER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/06/2024 |
| HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| ALLEN, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| CARTER, LAUREL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/06/2024 |
| CLAWSON, TRAVIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| DEVASHRAYEE, TRAVIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| DOTSON, WARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/06/2024 |
| ESPINOSA, STEPHANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| FRAGOSO, LINDSAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| IZATT, BRENDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| MAYER, SHAUNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/06/2024 |
| ROBERTSON, BRETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| SAMUELIAN, SPENCER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| SEASTRAND, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| SYMOND, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/06/2024 |
| WEST, CHRISTIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| WISEMAN, BRANDON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/06/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in UT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465139. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.