No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Monument Healthcare South Salt Lake

2472 South 300 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 · Government - Hospital district · 140 certified beds · (801) 466-2211 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations$36,546 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,546 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-19)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 61% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
2685 S 700 E · (702) 781-1877 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2561 S State St · (385) 770-0298 · Call to confirm hours
Park
305 E Robert Ave · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%3.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.3%16.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.9%15.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%25.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.9%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%3.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.4%21.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.8%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%0.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.1%91.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.9%16.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.941.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.581.431.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.7%CMS range 45.7–72.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.5–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 2.8–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.97
RN hoursweekends
47.2%
Total nursing turnover
45.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 101.8 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.56 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-19)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, 20 of 61 sampled resident, that the facility failed to ensure residents were providing supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, hot water temperatures in resident rooms throughout the facility were observed to range in temperatures from 121.7-145.5 degrees Fahrenheit. This deficient practice occurred at an Immediate Jeopardy level. In addition, residents who were assessed as requiring supervision while smoking were observed smoking unsupervised, a resident was not evaluated for smoking and was observed smoking, residents with a history of wandering eloped from the facility without staff knowing, the front doorbell was not working and residents were locked outside unable to alert staff, and metal bed frames and boxes were stored in a dayroom that residents were observed to be in. Resident Identifiers: 3, 21, 24, 25, 32, 42, 48, 66, 71, 72, 73, 87, 100, 103, 110, 115, 119, 418, 421, and 424. NOTICE: Notice of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was given verbally to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-06-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, a staff and public restroom had extremely hot water temperatures. These findings were found to have occurred at an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Level. NOTICE:Notice of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was given verbally to the Administrator on 6/10/25 at 2:30 PM. The Administrator was asked to develop an immediate plan to ensure resident safety related to hot water temperatures. PLAN:On 6/10/25 at 9:17 PM, the facility Administrator provided the following abatement plan for the removal of the IJ effective 6/10/25 at 8:30 PM.[Facility name] is providing the following information to demonstrate that the immediacy of the cited deficiency F689 has been removed.Summary of Actions Taken: Water temperatures were measured by Administrator/Maintenance Director to ensure it was at an appropriate temperature range.Residents at Potential Risk: A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-06-19 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for 2 of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure residents who displayed or were diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, a resident who was diagnosed with mental disorders was observed to be at the end of a hallway for hours with a urine odor yelling at staff and residents, was not provided her psychotropic medication, and did not follow up on a Nurse Practitioner's recommendation of inpatient psychiatric admission. Resident identifiers: 48 and 59.Findings included:Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included severe dementia with agitation, paranoid schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, and essential hypertension.Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, a resident did not have interventions in place to prevent a deep tissue ulcer/injury to the left inner buttocks from developing and treatments to prevent it from getting worse were not completed. Resident identifier: 143. Findings included: Resident 143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included benign neoplasm of meninges, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 4, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 143's medical record was reviewed on 1/23/24. On 4/28/23 at 1:54 PM, a Nursing Note documented Note Text: . alert and oriented x3-4 [person, place, time, and event] but slow at times to respond to commands, . is incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 4 out of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that the residents were free from abuse and neglect. Specifically, two residents were engaged in sexual activity without the consent of one resident and neither resident had been assessed for the capacity to consent to the sexual activity. Additionally, a resident was heard crying out in pain for over 4 hours and the nurse did not notify the physician to obtain an order for pain medication, having stated that the resident was drug seeking and attention seeking. The above examples were found to have occurred at a harm level. Lastly, a resident sustained a bruise that resulted from an improper transfer. Resident identifiers: 15, 19, 194, and 196. Findings included: HARM 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 51 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices. Specifically, a resident with a recent history of hospitalization for strokes was not assessed and was discharged against medical advice when a family member requested the resident be taken to a local hospital. The findings for this resident were determined to have occurred at a harm level. In addition, a resident did not receive treatment for low blood glucose levels, and another resident did not receive appropriate treatment for a diabetic ulcer. Resident identifiers: 4, 198 and 201. Findings include: HARM: 1. Resident 201 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, history of pulmonary embolism, schizophrenia, and frontal lobe and executive functioning deficit following cerebral infarction. On 3/21/22 at 5:10 PM, an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not provide a resident with pressure ulcers the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, staff did not notify the provider or wound care nurse of a resident's worsening pressure ulcer in a timely manner, resulting in the delay of necessary and appropriate treatment and services. In addition, the resident continued to receive treatment inappropriate for the worsening pressure ulcer due to staff not notifying the provider or wound care nurse in a timely manner. The deficient practice identified was found to have occurred at a harm level. Resident identifier: 36, 76 and 82. Findings included: HARM 1. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, morbid obesity, paraplegia, unspecified, cognitive communication deficit, limitation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-03-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, a resident was observed to cry out in uncontrolled pain for over 4 hours and the licensed nurse would not notify the physician of the resident's condition to request any new orders for pain medication. Resident identifier 194. Findings included: Resident 194 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of spinal stenosis, lumbar region, muscle spasms, chronic pain, age-related osteoporosis, radiculopathy lumbar region, encephalopathy, and ground level fall. On 3/14/22 at 11:21 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 194. Resident 194 stated that she took Tizanidine for muscle spasms and her primary care provider had her on a schedule for her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of correction to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance at a harm level with F684, F679, F686 and F600. In addition, several deficiencies were cited during the 2019 recertification survey, and again during the 2022 survey. Resident identifiers: 4, 198 and 201 Findings include: 1. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 51 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices. Specifically, a resident with a recent history of hospitalization for strokes was not assessed and was discharged against medical advice when a family member requested the resident be taken to a local hospital. The findings for this resident were determined to have occurred at a harm level. In addition, a resident did not receive treatment for low blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-19 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — widespread
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility did not provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. If the facility provided its own laboratory services, the services must meet the applicable requirement for laboratories. Specifically, facility glucometers were not being calibrated according to the manual. Findings included:1. The facility's 500 hall glucometer calibration and quality control tracking sheet was reviewed. The glucometer was calibrated on 4/24/25 at 6:30 AM, 5/4/25 at 9:45 AM, 5/17/25 at 4:40 PM, 6/1/25 at 1:00 AM, and 6/4/25 at 11:00 PM. On 6/12/25 at 10:08 AM, a phone interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that the night shift calibrated the facility glucometers weekly and documented the results in the narcotics binder. LPN 1 stated that, to his knowledge, the facility glucometer was working and accurate. On 6/12/25 at 10:40 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 2. LPN 2 stated the glucometers were calibrated weekly by the graveyard shift nurse and the calibration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, residents dining in the dining room were served beverages in Styrofoam cups and prepackaged juice cups. Findings included: On 6/9/25 at 11:55 AM, an observation was made of residents in the dining room for the lunch meal. Staff members were passing out beverages as residents entered the dining room and took their seats. Juices were being served in 4 ounce (oz), foil-covered cups and 4 oz. cartons, chocolate milk was served in a carton, white milk and water was being served in a Styrofoam cup. Coffee and tea were being served in a coffee cup. On 6/9/25 at 12:00 PM, an observation was made of resident 2 sitting at the dining table with 2 cartons of chocolate milk, 2 cartons of orange juice, 2 containers of red juice, a Styrofoam cup with a brown liquid in it and a coffee cup with a brown liquid in it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 3 out of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, notification to the SSA and APS was not done when a resident eloped from the facility and another resident alleged that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) put their fingers into her private parts. Additionally, a resident eloped from the facility and APS was not notified. Resident identifiers: 64, 113, and 115.Findings included:1. Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, unspecified focal traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, and vascular dementia.Resident 115's medical record was reviewed 6/9/25-6/19/25.On 3/31/24 at 8:53 PM, an alert note documented, At 1715 [5:15 PM], Medicare CNA answered a phone call from a person living in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 4 of 61 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, three resident's eye drops and one resident's insulin were expired. Resident identifiers: 31, 44, 106, and 107. Findings included: On [DATE] at 8:17 AM, an observation and interview were conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 7. RN 7 was observed to pull Ketotifen Fumarate eye drops out of the Long Term [NAME] Medication Cart. The eye drops were labeled with an open date of 4/11. RN 7 stated eye drops were good for 28 days after they were opened and that the eye drops were expired. At 8:39 AM, RN 7 was observed to administer the Ketotifen Fumarate eye drops into resident 31's eyes. At 10:41 AM, RN 7 stated they talked with the nurse manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, sanitizer solution was not measuring on the testing strips, there were soiled areas in the kitchen and spices were left open to air. Findings included:1. On 6/9/25 at 9:23 AM, an initial kitchen tour was conducted. The following was observed: a. The area behind the steamer had a white substance splattered on it, debris and grease splatter. The table it is sitting on is rusty, has a white splatter on the legs and the bottom shelf. b. The area under the storage shelves and under the storage carts in the dish room were soiled. The floor had a white substance on it. 2. On 6/18/25 at 11:54 AM, an observation was made of the Registered Dietitian (RD) in the kitchen without a hairnet, in the food preparation area. 3. On 6/19/25 at 11:19 AM, a follow-up tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed: a. The sanitizer solution in the cooking area was tested. The test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that policies were established and implemented to ensure that identified deficiencies were corrected. Specifically, areas of immediate jeopardy (IJ) were identified and not identified through the Quality Assurance and Performance (QAPI) process. In addition, multiple areas of non compliance were cited on the previous survey and again during the current recertification survey. Findings included:1. Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 12 out of 61 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, hot water temperatures in resident rooms throughout the facility were observed to range in temperatures from 121.7-145.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The deficient practice identified, in regards to the hot water, was found to have occurred at an Immediate Jeopardy level. In addition, residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 61 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers. Specifically, one resident representative was not informed in advance of starting an antidepressant medication and another resident representative was not informed in advance of a wanderguard being placed. Resident identifiers: 82 and 103.Findings included:1. Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included severe vascular dementia, hypertension, attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, depression, and cognitive communication deficit.Resident 82's medical record was reviewed 6/9/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined, 1 of 61 sampled residents, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse. Specifically, a Registered Nurse (RN) employee had a sexual relationship with a resident who resided in the facility. Resident identifier: 118Based on interview and record review, it was determined, 1 of 61 sampled residents, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse. Specifically, a Registered Nurse (RN) employee had a sexual relationship with a resident who resided in the facility. Resident identifier: 118Findings included:On 3/28/25 at 12:22 PM, the facility reported that on 3/28/25 at 10:00 AM an investigator from the Division of Professional Licensing (DOPL) came into the facility on a complaint from resident 118. It was reported to DOPL that RN 3 had been sexually inappropriate with resident 118. On 3/28/25 at 11:00 AM, RN 3 was placed on leave from the facility while an investigation was conducted. The form titled 359, the final investigation, was submitted to the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 4/2/25. The form revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 out of 61 sampled residents, that the facility did not notify the resident of the discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand; or send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman as soon as practicable or when a resident had not resided in the facility for 30 days. Specifically, the Ombudsman was not notified when one resident was discharged to the hospital and the ombudsman was not notified of a resident's discharge and the reasons why the resident left the facility. Resident identifiers: 54 and 113.Findings included:1. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease. Resident 54's medical record was reviewed 6/9/25-6/19/25.On 3/15/24 at 2:45 AM, a nursing progress note documented, .Patient was handed off with report to EMS [emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 61 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status. Specifically, a diagnosis of depression was not included on the assessment. Resident identifier: 82.Findings included:Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included severe vascular dementia, hypertension, attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, depression, and cognitive communication deficit.Resident 82's medical record was reviewed 6/9/25 through 6/19/25.A Psych (psychiatric) Follow Up note dated 10/4/24 at 6:00 AM indicated, .suggest Lexapro 5mg [milligrams] daily for depression and anxiety A Nursing note dated 10/12/24 at 1:13 PM indicated, New orders received from [mental health services] to start Lexapro [antidepressant medication] 5 mg QD [every day]. [Physician name redacted] agreed with recommendation.A Psych Follow Up note dated 10/18/24 at 6:30 AM indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 1 of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not provide care and services to maintain or improve a resident's ability to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, a resident's bed was positioned against a wall so that his inoperable hand was facing his environment, diminishing his abilities in activities of daily living. Resident identifier: 67.Findings included:Resident 67 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia, cerebral infarction, contracture left elbow, memory deficit, major depressive disorder, contracture left knee, and mood disorder.On 6/9/25 at 1:08 PM, an observation was made of resident 67 lying slumped down in bed with his head of bed elevated to 90 degrees, shirt pulled up and blankets partially covering his lower extremities. Resident 67's legs were bare, knees were bent and lying sideways in the bed with feet against the footboard and resident 67's upper body positioned approximately at midpoint in his bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 1 out of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and resident's choices. Specifically, a resident's diabetes was not managed with required documentation, timely referral to outside services or diet management according to physician's orders and resident's choice. Resident identifier: 36.Findings included: Resident 36 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia/hemiparesis, chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, type 1 diabetes, epilepsy and generalized anxiety disorder.On 6/12/25 at 8:07 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 36. Resident 36 stated he was not doing so great. Resident 36 stated he had a reminder on his amazon echo in the evening on 6/11/25, to take his blood glucose level which was reading Hi (high) on his continuous monitor, indicating his blood glucose level was over 400 milligrams per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 2 out of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that residents were offered a therapeutic diet when the therapeutic diet was ordered. Specifically, a resident on a diabetic diet was not provided a low carbohydrate option. In addition, a resident complained of not being provided a renal diet. Resident identifier: 36 and 79. Findings included: 1. On 6/12/25 at 8:07 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 36. Resident 36 stated he was not doing so great. Resident 36 stated he had a reminder on his amazon echo in the evening on 6/11/25, to take his blood glucose level which was reading Hi (high) on his continuous monitor, indicating his blood glucose level was over 400 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). On 6/12/25 at 8:27 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 36's family member. The family member asked resident 36 if he was still alive. Resident 36 told the family member about the Hi blood glucose reading on the continuous monitor and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that for 1 of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, a resident did not have an Invega injection available when it was scheduled to be administered. Resident identifiers: 59.Findings included:Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included severe dementia with agitation, paranoid schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, and essential hypertension.Resident 59's medical record was reviewed on 6/9/25 through 6/19/25.On 4/10/25, a 117 milligram (mg) Invega intramuscular injection was scheduled for administration. This order, which was started on 2/6/25 and discontinued on 4/14/25, was scheduled to be administrated every 21 days. On 4/10/25 at 4:21 PM, a Medication Administration Note stated that the ordered Invega injection was not administered because Injection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 2 of 61 sampled residents, the facility did not arrange services with an outside agency in a timely manner. Specifically, a resident that needed dental services did not have those services scheduled, and a resident did not have an endocrinology appointment scheduled after a referral from the physician. Resident identifiers: 36 and 64. Findings included: 1. Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, dementia, and morbid obesity. On 6/9/25 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 64 who stated she had seen a dentist in 2024 and was told she needed to see an outside dentist for further treatment. Resident 64 stated she had not yet seen an outside dentist. Resident 64's medical records were reviewed between 6/9/25 and 6/19/25. A physician order dated 8/24/24 revealed, May have dental, vision & eye health, hearing, wound and podiatry consults as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 61 sampled residents, that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that was complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized; and failed to ensure the medical record contained the results of any preadmission screening and resident review evaluations and determinations conducted by the State; and physician, nurse, and other licensed professionals progress notes. Specifically, one resident had an updated Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASRR) that was not located in the medical record and one resident had no documentation regarding an elopement. Resident identifiers: 82 and 103.Findings included:1. Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included severe vascular dementia, hypertension, attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, depression, and cognitive communication deficit.Resident 82's medical record was reviewed 6/9/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 out of 61 sampled residents. Specifically, staff were not wearing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with chronic wounds and a tube feed when caring for the resident and the tube feed was not capped when not in use. Resident identifier: 90.Findings included:Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, adult failure to thrive, and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition.On 6/9/25 at 10:58 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 90. Resident 90 stated that his tube feed was continuous, but was stopped and disconnected when he went outside the facility to smoke. Resident 90 stated that staff wore gloves when changing him, but not gowns. On 6/9/25 at 1:03 PM, an observation was made of resident 90's tube feed. Resident 90 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. In addition, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored under proper temperature controls. Specifically, opened insulin vials were not labeled with open dates and the insulin vials were in the medication cart available for resident use. In addition, the medication refrigerator was found to have low temperatures not compatible with medication storage and a pill was observed on the floor in the hallway accessible to residents. Findings included: 1. On 1/24/24 at 8:17 AM, an observation was conducted of Registered Nurse (RN) 1 performing medication pass to residents. An observation of RN 1's medication cart was made. The insulin Lispro glass via was observed and was open for administration and was not labeled with an open date. RN 1 was immediately interviewed. RN 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the walk-in freezer were open to air and the resident refrigerator was unclean and contained unlabeled and undated food items. Findings included: 1. On 1/22/24 at 8:15 AM, an initial walk-through was conducted in the kitchen. In the walk-in freezer, a box of frozen sausage patties was open to air and a box of frozen biscuits was open to air. On 1/25/24 at 9:59 AM, a second walk-through was conducted in the kitchen. In the walk-in freezer, a box of beef patties was open to air, a box of frozen sausage patties was open to air, a box of frozen biscuits was open to air, a box of peanut butter cookie dough was open to air, and a box of sugar cookie dough was open to air. On 1/25/24 at 10:28 AM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated when a food item was removed from the freezer, there was very little, if any, of the food product left so the few that were left would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, notification to the SSA and APS was not done when a resident with cognitive impairment eloped from the facility. Resident identifier: 7. Findings included: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included focal traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness, schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affection left non dominant side, history of falling, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Resident 7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care, and be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, a resident's baseline care plan was developed four days after the resident admitted to the facility. Resident identifier: 143. Resident 143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included benign neoplasm of meninges, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 4, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 143's medical record was reviewed on 1/23/24. A care plan Focus initiated on 5/2/23, documented [Resident 143] has skin graft donor sites to bilateral thighs on admission to the facility. The interventions included, Wound care per orders. A care plan Focus initiated on 5/2/23, documented Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, the resident's Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment triggered a care plan for pressure ulcer/injury and the care plan was not developed until 5/8/23, after the resident developed a pressure ulcer/injury. Resident identifier: 143. Findings included: Resident 143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included benign neoplasm of meninges, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 4, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 143's medical record was reviewed on 1/23/24. On 4/28/23 at 1:54 PM, a Nursing Note documented Note Text: . alert and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 26 sampled residents, a resident with cognitive impairment eloped from the facility on two separate occasions. Resident identifier: 7. Findings included: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included focal traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness, schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affection left non dominant side, history of falling, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Resident 7's medical record was reviewed on 1/24/24. A care plan Focus initiated on 6/19/2020, documented [Resident 7] is an elopement risk/wanderer. The Focus was revised on 4/18/23. The interventions included, but were not limited to: a. Monitor location as necessary. Initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, for 2 out of 26 sampled residents, medications were not administered as ordered by the physician due to the medications not being available by the pharmacy. One resident was not administered their mood disturbance medication, anti-tremor medication, and a medication for sleep. In addition, a resident was not administered their blood thinning medication to prevent blood clots and an antibiotic that was used to treat a wound infection. Resident Identifiers: 7 and 143. Findings Included: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included focal traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness, schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affection left non dominant side, history of falling, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder, and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, staff members were observed to touch the resident's medications and the inside of the medication cups with bare hands during medication administration. Resident identifier: 9. Findings included: On 1/24/24 at 8:26 AM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) 3 during medication administration. RN 3 grabbed a medication cup on the base of the cup, she then placed it on the medication cart and then grabbed it again placing a bare right hand finger inside of the medication cup. On 1/24/24 at 8:28 AM, an observation was made of RN 3. RN 3 took a medication bottle from the medication cart, she opened the bottle and shook the pill bottle until a pill was near the edge of the bottle. RN 3 took a bare right hand finger and touched the medication, placing it into the bottle lid and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the dishwasher did not meet the required minimum temperatures during the wash cycle. Findings include 1. On 3/14/22 at 7:29 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The dish machine log temperature form was reviewed. The following temperatures were documented: [Note: All temperatures were in degrees Fahrenheit.] a. On 2/21/22, the temperature for dinner dish washing cycle was 118 b. On 2/22/22, the temperature for the dinner dish washing cycle was 119. c. On 3/2/22, the temperature for the dinner dish washing cycle was 115. d. On 3/6/22, the temperature for the dinner dish washing cycle was 116. The bottom of the Dish Machine Log revealed Chemical Sanitizing (Low temp): Wash 120-140 and Rinse 120-140. 2. On 3/17/22 at 2:30 PM, an observation of the dishwasher was made. The wash cycle of the dishwasher reached 111.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The dishwasher was a low temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-03-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility assessment must address or include both the number of residents and facility's resident capacity; the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that were present within that population; the staff competencies that were necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population; the physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plan considerations that were necessary to care for this population; and any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility, including but not limited to, activities and food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not have a facility assessment. Findings include: On 3/14/22, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 51 sample residents, that residents were not able to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that were significant to residents. Specifically, the facility did not allow residents to smoke independently after being evaluated. In addition, a resident requested coffee and was not provided it. Resident identifiers: 47, 51, 52, 59 and 196. Findings include: 1. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, polyneuropathy, unspecified asthma, and generalized anxiety disorder. On 3/14/22 at 11:15 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 47. Resident 47 stated that she wished that the facility .would let me smoke when I like. Resident 47 further explained They took away our cigarettes and lighters which I can understand, but they can't be taking away our smoking times. We have rights you know. Resident 47's medical record was reviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review it was determined, for 4 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when residents experienced a significant change in physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Specifically, the physician was not notified for 8 days of a resident's worsening wound condition and the physician was not notified when a resident experienced low blood glucose levels. In addition, the physician was not notified a resident was screaming out in pain during the night and the physician was not notified a open wounds on a resident's foot. Resident identifier: 4, 76, 194 and 198. Findings included: 1. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, morbid obesity, paraplegia, unspecified, cognitive communication deficit, limitation of activities due to disability, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, pain in unspecified limb,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 12 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. Specifically, there were multiple complaints from residents and observations of rooms in the facility that were unclean, needed to be repainted, and had a urine odor. Additionally, certain areas in the facility had holes in the walls, and sinks that did not drain. Resident identifiers: 10, 15, 23, 41, 51, 58, 62, 68, 72, 82, 198 and 200. Findings included: 1. Resident rooms and areas that were not homelike: On 3/14/22 at 7:29 AM, an initial tour of the facility was conducted. The following observations were made: a. The dining room was observed to have open sugar packets on the floor. There were 2 dirty trays on the tables. There was a carton of open milk on a table. The tables were soiled with debris. b. The wall outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 51 sampled residents, that the facility did not implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect. Specifically, the facility did not demonstrate implementation of their abuse policy through timely investigation and reporting of suspected abuse to the Administrator (ADM), State Survey Agency (SSA), and Adult Protective Services (APS). Resident identifiers: 15, 19, 194, and 196. Findings included: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), cognitive communication deficit, type 2 diabetes mellitus and insomnia. Review of the facility final investigation report for sexual abuse on 3/11/22 documented that on 3/5/22 at 2:00 PM resident 19 reported to Registered Nurse (RN) 5 that she had asked resident 196 to stop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 51 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the administrator (ADM) of the facility and to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, an incident of sexual abuse, an incident of neglect with verbal abuse, and an incident of physical abuse were not reported to the ADM, SSA or APS within 2 hours after the identification or occurrence of the incident happening. Resident identifiers: 19, 194, and 196. Findings included: 1. Incident of sexual abuse between resident 19 and resident 196. Review of the facility final investigation report for sexual abuse on 3/11/22 documented that on 3/5/22 at 2:00 PM resident 19 reported to Registered Nurse (RN) 5 that she had asked resident 196 to stop kissing her breasts and that he did not immediately stop. RN 5 reported the incident to the facility Administrator (ADM) and an investigation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that, for 3 of 51 sampled residents, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that described services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, a resident who was observed to be smoking was not identified as a smoker did not have a smoking care plan. In addition, the facility staff did not update a resident's care plan in a timely manner when a wound requiring treatment was identified and a resident with limited range of motion did not have interventions for therapy and splints on the care plan. In addition, Resident identifiers: 23, 38 and 76. Findings include: 1. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, schizoaffective disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 3/14/22 at 11:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 51 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADL's). Specifically, resident showers were not being completed according to their shower schedule. Resident identifiers: 41, 64, 82, 198. Findings include 1. Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, polyneuropathy, and major depressive disorder. On 3/14/22 at 11:36 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 64. Resident 64 stated she had been in clothes since yesterday. Resident 64 stated she woke-up yesterday in urine and bowel. Resident 64 stated she wanted a shower but did not get a shower. On 3/17/22 at 10:45 AM, an interview with resident 64 was conducted. Resident 64 stated that her shower schedule was every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Resident 64 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 10 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill set to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physicial, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessment and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnosies of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Specifically, there was no facility asssessment to determine staffing needs for resident. Resident identifiers: 6, 9, 15, 29, 36, 58, 62, 194, 198 and 201. Findings included: 1. On 03/14/22 at 7:41 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 9. Resident 9 stated the response time to call lights depended on who was working. Resident 9 stated that he usually had to wait about 30 minutes for someone to answer his call light. Resident 9 stated in the afternoons was when he had waited the longest for someone to answer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview it was determined that, for 12 of 51 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance; food and drink that was not palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, multiple residents complained about the palatability of the food, appearance of the food, and repetition of meals. Resident identifiers: 4, 10, 15, 32, 36, 48, 51, 58, 62, 64, 80 and 81. Findings include On 3/14/22 at 12:30 PM, an interview with resident 51 was conducted. Resident 51 stated that the food tasted like school lunch, and he refused to eat it. On 3/14/22 at 1:30 PM, an interview with resident 15 was conducted. Resident 15 stated the food was not good. Resident 15 stated that her family member brought in food for her so she did not have to eat the meals provided by the facility. On 3/14/22 at 10:34 AM, an interview with resident 62 was conducted. Resident 62 stated that the food often arrived cold or lukewarm. Resident 62 stated that the facility often did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19. Specifically, food was observed to be transported through the hallways uncovered, the staff were observed entering resident rooms without proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and soiled PPE was observed to be transported through the hallways, and resident care equipment was not sanitized. Findings include: 1. Dining Observations: On 3/14/22 at 8:30 AM, observations were made of the breakfast meal service in the 300 and 500 hallway. The cart in the 300 hallway was parked halfway down the hallway. Trays were observed to be transported through the hallway without a condiment cup with syrup covered. At 8:36 AM, an observation was made of the Dietary Manager transporting the 400 hall meal cart to the hallway. There was a tray observed on top with syrup that was uncovered. The meal cart had been transported from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not treat each resident with respect, dignity and care, in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance and enhancement of his or her quality of life. Specifically, residents were observed to have urine soaked beds. Resident identifiers: 58 and 82. Findings included: 1. Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (CP), chronic myeloid leukemia, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder. On 3/14/22 at 10:08 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 82. Resident 82 stated staff changed his brief before bed the pervious night and then again just now. An observation was made of resident 82's bed. Resident 82's bed was observed to be saturated with urine and had a strong urine odor. Resident 82 stated his bed was saturated with urine and smelled. Resident 82 stated he was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample residents, that the facility failed to assure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening was accurately completed. Resident identifiers: 16. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder, other stimulant abuse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and right foot drop. On 3/21/2022 at 1:15 PM, a record review was conducted of Resident 16's electronic health record. No PASARR screening was found. On 3/21/2022 at 4:06 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Mental Health Services/Master's of Social Work (MSW). MSW stated there was not a PASARR completed. MSW stated the resident was private pay and she was not aware that a PASARR needed to be completed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not develop a baseline care plan for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care. Specifically, a resident had wounds identified on their admission assessment and the baseline care plan did not address the skin condition or wound care treatment. Resident identifier: 198. Findings included: Resident 198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of right humerus, ground level fall, alcohol dependence, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cellulitis of left lower limb, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, sleep apnea, dorsalgia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and chronic pain. On 3/14/22 at 1:18 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 198. Resident 198 stated that he had open wounds on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, a resident was not provided showers according to their schedule. Resident identifier: 36. Findings included: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, muscle weakness and major depressive disorder. On 3/14/22 at 1:43 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 36. Resident 36 stated she would like to be showered 3 to 4 times per week. Resident 36 stated she was showered one to two times per week. Resident 36 stated she was showered a few days ago because she went a long time without a bed bath. Resident 36's roommate stated that resident 36's hair was matted and it was not healthy to go that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health. Specifically, staff did not review the podiatrist's recommendations in a timely manner, resulting in the delay of proper treatment of a resident's foot issues. Resident identifier: 76. Findings included: Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, morbid obesity, paraplegia, cognitive communication deficit, limitation of activities due to disability, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, pain in unspecified limb and borderline personality disorder. On 3/21/22 at 3:29 PM, an interview was conducted with unit manager (UM) 2. UM 2 stated the latest podiatry visit note for resident 76 was not in the electronic health record (EHR) but she would provide a copy for review. On 3/21/22 at 5:57 PM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 2 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion. In addition, the facility did not ensure that residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence. Specifically, a resident with limited range of motion did not have a splint that was recommended by Occupational Therapy. In addition, a resident was not provided bilateral positioning bars so she was able to reposition herself. Resident identifiers: 23 and 48. Findings included: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, paralytic syndrome, age-related osteoporosis, difficulty in walking, mood disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. On 3/15/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews it was determined that, for 2 of 51 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, one resident was observed smoking without protective equipment that he was assessed to need. In addition, another resident was observed smoking and did not have a smoking assessment. Resident identifier: 5 and 38. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, obesity, hypothyroidism, and hypertension. On 3/14/22 at 11:38 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident 5. Resident 5 stated staff had him sign a paper about smoking a few weeks back and all residents were on a schedule now. Resident 5 stated that he only got to go out when staff said he could. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure based on resident's comprehensive assessment, that a resident who was incontinent received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. Specifically, a resident was evaluated to be a good candidate for a bladder retraining program and the resident was not provided the program. In addition, the resident and another resident were observed to be in urine soaked beds. Resident identifiers: 58 and 82. Findings included: 1. Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (CP), chronic myeloid leukemia, schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder. On 3/14/22 at 10:08 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 82. Resident 82 stated staff changed his brief before bed the pervious night and then just now. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program that included an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 51 sample residents. Specifically, a resident was receiving an antibiotic prophylactically, with no indication for use or periodic review of the necessity of the antibiotic. Resident identifier: 4. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, protein calorie malnutrition, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident 4's medical record was reviewed on 3/15/22. Resident 4's physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2022 were reviewed. The orders and MAR indicated that resident 4 had been receiving Doxycycline Hyclate 100 milligrams twice daily since 7/25/17. The diagnosis listed for the antibiotic medication was prophylaxis. On 2/24/22, the resident's physician assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample resident, that the facility did not follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines to offer pneumococcal immunizations. Specifically, a resident had no record of receiving the pneumococcal vaccine per CDC and ACIP guidelines. Resident Identifier: 196 Findings include: Resident 196 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, and encounter for immunization. On 3/21/22, Resident 196's medical record was reviewed. Resident 196's immunization history revealed that he consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccine on 2/11/2020. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the pneumococcal vaccine was administered. On 3/21/22 an interview was conducted with Unit Manager (UM) 3. UM 3 stated We normally always have a copy of the administration of a vaccine uploaded,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 51 sample residents, that the facility did not have each bed with ceiling suspended curtains, which extended around the bed to provide total visual privacy in combination with adjacent walls and curtains. Specifically, the curtains in a resident's room did not have the ability to close all the way, leaving the resident to not have full visual privacy. Resident identifier: 62 Findings include 1. Resident 62 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 8/6/21 with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease, epilepsy, asthma, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, generalized anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. On 3/21/22 at 10:20 AM, an observation was made in resident 62's room. It was observed that resident 62 shared a room with another resident. It was observed that the privacy curtain was unable to close completely, leaving approximately a 1-foot gap of open space near the entrance of the room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,546 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $18,155 — penalty dated 2025-06-19
  • $18,391 — penalty dated 2024-01-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
MONUMENT HEALTH PROPERTIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MONUMENT REAL ESTATE SOUTH SALT LAKE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MURRAY, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2020
HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
CLAWSON, TRAVISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
FRAGOSO, LINDSAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
GALINDO, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
LOCK, CHELSEAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
MARRIOTT, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
RIOS, LOUIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2026
ROBERTSON, BRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
SAMUELIAN, SPENCERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
SEASTRAND, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025
WEST, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+22.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.6M
Related-party expense61% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 3%Other / private 14%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 61% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,201per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$434per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Utah Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Utah
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,475/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 465146. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next