Gainesville Health And Rehab Center
7501 Heritage Village Plaza, Gainesville, VA 20155 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (571) 248-6100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2020
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.2% | 14.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.5% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.8% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.1% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.5% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.5% | 73.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.6% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.18 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.2%CMS range 46.1–61.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 9.6–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.5–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for four of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #15, Resident #11, Resident #80 and Resident #67. The findings include: 1. For Resident #15 (R15), facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the use of fall mats and positioning the bed in a low position. (R15) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to epilepsy (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/19/2023, (R15) was coded as having both short- and long-term memory difficulties and was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 02/27/2023 at approximately 12:25 p.m., (R15) was observed lying in their bed. There were no fall mats next to the bed and the bed was not in a low position. Using a standard carpenter's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide complete dialysis care and services per the comprehensive plan of care for two of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #67 and Resident #71. The findings include: 1. For Resident #67, the facility failed to provide communication to the dialysis facility for one of 13 visits in November 2022, 4 of 13, visits in December 2022, 5 of 13, visits in January 2023 and 2 of 12 visits in February 2023. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/15/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. Section O-special procedures/treatments coded the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide rehabilitation services for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #261. The findings include: For Resident #261 (R261), the facility staff failed to provide physical and occupational therapy services from 03/18/2022 through 03/23/2022. (R261) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to muscle weakness. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/11/2022, (R261) scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating (R261) was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The physician's order sheet dated 03/01/2022 - 04/30/2022 documented in part, PT/OT/ST (Physical therapy/occupational therapy/speech therapy) to eval (evaluate) as indicated. Order Date: 03/04/2022. OT Clarification Order: OT to see 5x/wk x 4 (five times per week times four) weeks .Order Date: 03/07/2022. PT Clarification Order: skilled PT to see 5x a wk for 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0840 — patternEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to have a written dialysis agreement for the facility for two of two residents who utilized the dialysis center, Resident #67 and Resident #71. The findings include: The facility failed to evidence a written dialysis agreement for one dialysis center that Resident #67 and Resident #71 received dialysis at. During the entrance conference to the facility on 2/27/23, a request was made for the dialysis contracts or agreements. On 2/27/23, a review of the dialysis contracts evidenced no contract for the one dialysis company utilized by Resident #67 and Resident #71 On 2/28/23 at approximately 3:23 PM, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator stated, there was no contract for this dialysis center. On 3/1/23 at approximately 1:00 PM, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing, ASM #4, the assistant director of nursing and ASM #5, the clinical services specialist was made aware of the findings. No further information was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain an complete and accurate clinical record for three of 46 residents in the survey sample, Residents #105, #162, and #261. The findings include: 1. For Resident #105 (R105) the facility staff failed complete the Social Services admission Assessment upon admission to the facility. R105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/5/2023 was completed. Review of the clinical record failed to evidence any Social Services Assessments for R105. A request was made for any social services notes or assessments completed for R105. The following documentation was provided. An assessment for the Brief Interview for Mental Status was completed on 1/31/2023. A Patient Mood Interview was presented, dated 1/31/2023. A Room Change Notification note, written by the social services staff, was dated 2/21/2023. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct a periodic review of an advance directive for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 80 (R80). The finding include: For (R80), the facility staff failed to evidence a quarterly review for an advance directive. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/06/2023, (R80) scored three out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The facility's Social Services Quarterly Review for (R80) dated 02/16/2022 failed to evidence a review of an advance directive. The physician's order for (R80) documented, Full code. Order Date: 09/03/2022. On 03/01/2023 at approximately 9:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #11, assistant director of social services. When asked about the procedure for reviewing a resident's advance directive OSM #11 stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for two out of 46 residents in the survey sample, Residents #67 and #110. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to complete an accurate annual assessment MDS to include dialysis for Resident #67. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation and cardiomegaly. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/15/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. Section O-special procedures/treatments coded the resident as dialysis no. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 10/17/20, which revealed, FOCUS: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 46 residents on the survey sample, Resident #165 (R165). The findings include: The facility staff failed to revise the care plan for the use of a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) (1) and for the administration of TPN (total parenteral nutrition) (2) for R165. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/22/2022, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A significant change MDS assessment was in progress. On 2/27/2023 at approximately 12:30 p.m. R165 was observed in bed with TPN solution being administered through the PICC line. The Nutritional Care Plan dated 10/5/2022 and revised on 1/5/2023, failed to evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration and monitoring, for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #163. The findings include: 1.a. For Resident #163 (R163), the facility staff failed to transcribe a telephone order for Tums (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a five day admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/15/2022, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R163 receiving hemodialysis. The SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) Communication Form for R163 dated 11/13/2022 documented in part, .NP (nurse practitioner) notified of patients complaint of heartburn new orders received for Tums 500mg (milligram) q4h (every four hours) PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement fall interventions for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #15. The findings include: For Resident #15 (R15), the facility staff failed to place the bed in a low position while (R15) was lying in their bed. (R15) was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to epilepsy (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/19/2023, (R15) was coded as having both short and long term memory difficulties and was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 02/27/2023 at approximately 12:25 p.m., (R15) was observed lying in their bed. There were no fall mats next to the bed and the bed was not in a low position. Using a standard carpenter's ruler, a measurement taken from the bottom of the mattress to the floor revealed the bed was 16 inches from the floor. On 02/27/2023 at approximately 2:45 p.m., (R15) was observed lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #11. The findings include: For Resident #11 (R11), the facility staff failed to maintain the physician ordered oxygen flow rate at two liters per minute. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: congestive heart failure (1). On 02/27/2023 at approximately 12:39 p.m., an observation of (R11) revealed they were lying in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Observation of the flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed a flow rate between three-and-a-half and four liters per minute. On 02/27/2023 at approximately 3:52 p.m., an observation of (R11) revealed they were lying in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Observation of the flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed a flow rate between three-and-a-half and four liters per minute. On 02/28/2023 at approximately 8:54 a.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a complete pain management program including implementation of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medications for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #58. The findings include: For Resident #58 (R58), the facility staff failed to evidence implementation of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration of the as needed pain medication, Percocet (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/15/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J documented R58 receiving as needed pain medications and not receiving non-medication interventions for pain. Section N documented R58 receiving Opioid medications 2 of the 7 days during the assessment period. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow the assessment for the use of side rails for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #165. The findings include: For Resident #165 (R165), the facility staff had side rails up while the resident was in bed, however the bed/side rail evaluation indicated no bed rails were required. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/22/2022, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, R165 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for moving in the bed and extensive assistance of two staff member for transfers. On 2/27/2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m. R165 was observed in their bed with both side rails up at that time. A second observation was made on 2/27/2023 at 3:12 p.m. R165 was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to store medications in a secure manner for one of 46 residents in the survey sample, Resident #71. The findings include: The facility failed to secure medications for Resident #71 (R71). On 2/28/2023 at 8:36 a.m., three Midodrine 2.5 mg tablets (1) were observed unsecured in R71's dialysis communication book in the residents room in an open duffel bag. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/13/2023, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O documented R71 receiving dialysis while a resident. The physician orders for R71 documented in part, - Midodrine HCl (hydrochloride) Tablet 10 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for Hypotension. Send 1 tab (tablet) with pt (patient) to dialysis every M,W,F.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for three of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident's # 35, #10, and #32. The facility staff failed to develop Resident # 35's comprehensive care plan to address the care needs and diagnosis of epilepsy; failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for Resident # 10's physician ordered fluid restriction and failed to implement Resident #2's comprehensive care plan, for the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medication. The findings include: 1. Resident # 35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: epilepsy [1]. Resident # 35's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 07/10/2021, coded Resident # 35 as scoring an 11 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for three of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents #64, #297, and #63. 1. The facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plans for Residents #64 and #297 following a resident to resident incident between them on 5/8/21. 2. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #63's care plan when he began taking an antidepressant medication. The findings include: 1. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a femur fracture, bipolar disorder (1), epilepsy (2), alcohol abuse, and nicotine dependence. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/3/21, Resident #64 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions, having scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). He was coded as having demonstrated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote a safe environment for three of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents #64, #297, and #35. 1. Resident #64 was repeatedly allowed to leave the facility unsupervised without being assessed for safety to do so, and without being educated by the facility regarding the risks of suffering a serious injury while out of the facility without supervision. On 5/8/21, Resident #64 rammed his wheelchair into Resident #297's wheelchair multiple times while Resident #297 was seated in her wheelchair. The facility failed to assess Resident #297 for injury, and failed to implement interventions to ensure a safe environment and the safety of Resident #297. The facility failed to perform urine and/or blood screening tests for alcohol and illegal drugs on Resident #64 on multiple occasions when the resident displayed symptoms of impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to have a complete pain management program for two of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32 and Resident #63. 1. The facility staff failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of an as needed pain medication and failed to document the location of Resident #32's pain. 2. The facility staff failed to document the location of Resident #63's pain on multiple occasions in September 2021 when administering an as-needed pain medication to him. The findings include: 1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pneumonia (1), depression, asthma (2), and a pressure injury on the sacral area (3). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/9/2021, coded Resident #32 as scoring a 15 on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and service for a complete dialysis [1] program for two of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 10 and Resident #33. The facility staff failed to ensure ongoing communication regarding Resident #10 and Resident #33's care with the residents' dialysis centers. The findings include: 1. Resident # 10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage kidney disease [2]. Resident # 10's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 06/13/2021, coded Resident # 10 as scoring a three [3] on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs coded Resident # 10 for Dialysis while a resident. The POS [physician's order sheet] for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide accommodations of resident needs by ensuring the call bell [a device with a button that can be pushed to alert staff when assistance is needed] was within reach for one of 31 current residents in the survey sample, Resident # 70. The facility staff failed to maintain Resident # 70's call bell within reach for use. The findings include: Resident # 70 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: hemiplegia [1] and muscle weakness, respiratory failure [2] and tracheostomy [3]. Resident #70's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a modification admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/09/2021, coded Resident # 70 as scoring a 6 [six] on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 6 - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions Section G0400 Functional Limitation in Range of Motion coded Resident # 70 as Impairment on one side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to issue a notice of discharge from Medicare services for three of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 91, #145, #146. The findings include: 1. Resident #91's last covered Medicare Part A services was 8/8/2021. The facility staff failed to notify Resident #91 (and/or the resident's responsible representative) of the last covered day and the right to appeal. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, COVID 19 pneumonia (an infection in one or both of the lungs. Many germs, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi, can cause pneumonia) (1), and dementia (a progressive state of mental decline, especially memory function and judgement, often accompanied by disorientation. (2). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 9/8/2021, coded the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a witnessed allegation of abuse was reported immediately and or within 2 hours to the state agency for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #297. On 5/8/21, a staff member observed Resident #64 repeatedly slamming his wheelchair into Resident #297's wheelchair. The facility did not report this incident to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #297 no longer resides in the facility. She was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 5/15/21. She was admitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, COPD (3), and anxiety disorder. On the most recent MDS, an admission assessment with an ARD of 4/26/21, she was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions, having scored seven out of 15 on the BIMS. She was coded as being completely dependent on facility staff for all ADLs, and as using a wheelchair for locomotion. Resident #64 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the Ombudsman for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #58. The facility staff failed to provide notice to the ombudsman of Resident #58's transfer to the hospital on 8/22/21. The findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to myoclonus, epilepsy, nonpsychotic mental disorder, substance abuse, anxiety, and depression. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/5/21 coded Resident #58 as cognitively intact to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance with all areas of activities of daily living. A review of the clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 8/22/21 that documented, Resident was visiting with SO (significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered fluid restrictions were implemented and monitored per physicians orders for two of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 10 and #33. The facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered fluid restrictions for Resident #10 and #33 were implemented and monitored to ensure the physician amount of fluids were provided. The findings include: 1. Resident # 10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to end stage kidney disease [2]. Resident # 10's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 06/13/2021, coded Resident # 10 as scoring a three [3] on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs coded Resident # 10 for Dialysis while a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that two of five CNA [certified nursing assistant] records reviewed had received required annual competencies, CNA #1 and #2. The facility failed to evidence completed competencies for CNA [certified nursing assistants] # 1 with a hire date of 06/26/2018 and CNA # 2 with a hire date of 05/16/2017. The findings include: Upon entrance on 09/14/21 at approximately 11:00 a.m., an Entrance Conference form was provided to ASM [administrative staff member] # 1, administrator. One document on this form was a request for a list of all current CNA [certified nursing assistant] staff who had been employed at the facility for longer than one year. The list provided contained seven CNA's that had been employed longer than a year and was still employed at the facility. A request was made for both CNA #1 and CNA #2's annual training and competency evaluations. On 09/16/21 at 9:56 a.m., during a meeting with ASM # 1, ASM # 2 and ASM # 3, a concern was expressed regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide behavioral health services for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #64. The facility staff failed to evidence that behavioral health services were offered to Resident #64 between 5/14/21 and 8/15/21. The findings include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a femur fracture, bipolar disorder (1), epilepsy (2), alcohol abuse, and nicotine dependence. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/3/21, Resident #64 was coded as having no cognitive impairment for making daily decisions, having scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). He was coded as having demonstrated no mood disorder symptoms, no psychosis, no behaviors toward himself or others, no rejection of care, and no wandering. He was coded as being independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of drugs in one of three medication carts observed, medication cart on the Fairview unit. An unlabeled Ventolin inhaler without the box packaging was observed stored, available for resident use in the middle drawer of the Fairview unit. the findings include: Observation was made of the medication cart on the Fairview unit, middle hall on 9/16/2021 at 11:32 a.m. An inhaler, Ventolin HFA (1), was observed sitting in the middle drawer of the medication cart. There was no resident name, no pharmacy label, and nothing documented on the container. There was no empty box for the inhaler in the drawer. An interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #4 on 9/16/2021 at 11:32 a.m. When asked who the inhaler belonged to, LPN #4 stated the resident was no longer there. LPN #4 stated he grabbed it and threw away the box. He stated he didn't know how to discard the medication. An interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure food was served at temperatures palatable for meal enjoyment during the lunch meal on 9/15/21. The findings include: On 9/14/21 at 12:12 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #38. She stated that the food was an issue. She did not give specifics. However, a complaint being investigated regarding Resident #38, dated 6/3/21, also alleged that the resident had reported that the food was so bad she won't eat it. A review of facility grievances revealed one dated 12/17/20 from Resident #38 that documented, Resident reports food is still horrible and has gotten worse Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to congestive heart failure, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, Hodgkin's lymphoma, Meniere's disease, adjustment disorder, anxiety, and depression. The most recent MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. During observation of trayline services on 9/15/21, OSM #2 (Other Staff Member), a dietary aide picked up a sandwich off the floor and continued preparing meal trays without changing gloves and washing her hands. The findings include: On 9/15/21 at 11:20 AM, the trayline service was observed in the kitchen. OSM #2 (Other Staff Member), a dietary aide, was at the end of the trayline, adding final items to the trays, i.e. desserts, beverages, etc., before placing on the cart for delivery. During this observation, at 11:56 AM, OSM #2 was observed retrieving a sandwich from a nearby refrigerator for a tray. OSM #2 dropped the sandwich on the floor, picked it up off the floor, and placed it on a nearby stainless steel table, away from the food prep area. She then obtained another sandwich, placed it on the resident's tray. She continued with the trayline service of finishing off the trays with final items and carting them;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services in a manner to prevent the spread of infection on two of three hallways on the Fairview Unit, the warm hallway , and the combination hallway containing both warm and cold residents. Two CNAs (certified nursing assistants), CNA #6 and CNA #7 were observed distributing meal trays, setting up resident meal trays, and removing meal trays from resident rooms on the warm hallway and the combination hallway of the Fairview Unit during lunch on 9/14/21. They were not wearing gloves or gowns when coming into contact with personal items and linens in the warm rooms, were not wearing gloves when handling trays from the hot rooms, and were not consistently sanitizing their hands between residents. The findings include: On 9/14/21 at 11:15 a.m., an entrance conference was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator. When asked if any residents were on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-24 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, and employee record review, the facility staff failed to ensure six of eight CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed, received the required twelve-hours, of annual training, (CNA [certified nursing assistant] # 1, 2, 3 4, 5 and 6); and failed to ensure that the training included the required dementia, abuse and neglect or infection control training for four of the eight CNA's reviewed, (CNA #1, 2, 3 and 6). The findings include: On 1/23/20 at 4:30 p.m., a review of the facility's CNA annual training was conducted by this surveyor. Review of eight CNA training transcripts revealed six of eight CNAs selected for review did not meet the required 12-hours of annual training. Further Review of eight CNA training transcripts revealed four of eight CNAs selected for review did not meet the required dementia, abuse and neglect or infection control training. 1. Review of CNA #1's training transcript documented a hire date of 8/4/2015. Further review of the training transcript dated 8/4/2018 through 8/4/2019 documented, 0 hours and failed to evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. In the dry storage area, a five-pound bag of pasta open and undated, and one-pound-eight-ounce package of dry drink mix was observed opened and undated. Food debris were observed on the inside of each of 18 dessert bowls that were stacked upside down on the second shelf of the dry dish rack in the facility, and OSM (other staff member) #5, a cook was observed with a uncovered mustache preparing resident food. The findings include: On 01/22/20 at 10:40 a.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen, was conducted with OSM [other staff member] # 1, dietary manager and revealed the following: Observation the kitchen's dry storage room revealed a five-pound bag of 'Bowtie' pasta with approximately half remaining in the bag, sitting in a box on the middle shelf. Observation of the bag failed to evidence an open date. After observing, the bag of pasta OSM # 1 stated that the bag did not have a date on it and it could not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide care in a manner to promote dignity for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 29. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #29's urinary catheter bag was place in a privacy bag. Observation of Resident #29's catheter collection bag revealed the bag was hanging on the lower part of the bed and was not in a privacy bag, and urine was visible in catheter bag from the hallway. The findings include: Resident # 29 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: obstructive and reflux uropathy [1], low iron and swallowing difficulties. Resident # 29's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/19/19, coded Resident # 29 as scoring a three on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition intact for making daily decisions. Resident # 29 was coded as being dependent of one staff member for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to meet advanced directive requirements for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 99. The facility staff failed to obtain and place completed copy of Resident #99's advance directive in the clinical record. The findings include: Resident # 99 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, low iron and cerebral palsy [1]. Resident # 99's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/02/2020, coded Resident # 99 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The comprehensive care plan for Resident # 99 with a revision date of 09/06/2018 documented, Focus: [Resident # 99] has a full code status. Revision on 09/06/2018. The Social Services Annual/Significant Change Assessment for Resident # 99 dated 11/30/2019 documented, B1b. If Advance Directive exist, has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 65 and # 87, were free from abuse. On 10/04/20 9, Resident # 38 hit Resident # 65's right arm and Resident #87, was hit on the upper left arm by Resident #90 causing a pre-existing blood blister to open and bleed on 2/18/19. The findings include: 1. Resident # 65 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: swallowing difficulties, ataxia [1] and epilepsy [2]. Resident # 65's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/11/19, coded Resident # 65 as scoring an 12 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 12 - being moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 65 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. The Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop or implement a comprehensive care plan for two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #20 and #87. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan, to include the use of an incentive spirometer (1) for Resident #20 and #87. The finding include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to atrial fibrillation (2), obstructive sleep apnea (3) and congestive heart failure (4). Resident #20's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/05/2019, coded Resident #20 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. On 1/22/20 at 10:55 a.m., an observation was made of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 82. The facility staff failed revise Resident #82's comprehensive care plan to address the resident's forgetfulness, of placing the nasal cannula [1] back on for continuous oxygen therapy according to the physician's order. The findings include: Resident # 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [2]. Resident # 82's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/22/19, coded Resident # 82 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs coded Resident #…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for two of 40 residents in the survey sample; Residents #67 and #94. The facility staff failed to administer medications in accordance to professional standards for Resident #67. The facility staff crushed the resident's Aspirin EC (1) (enteric coated) Delayed Release 81 mg (milligrams) tablet; and crushed the resident's Potassium Chloride ER (2) (extended release) 10 meq (milliequivalent) tablet. The facility staff failed to clarify a physician's order for Resident #94's prn [as needed] pain medications to determine when and which as needed pain medication to administer based on pain level rating parameters. The findings include: 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, high blood pressure, heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide podiatry (foot) services for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The facility staff failed to ensure foot care was provided to Resident #3 a diabetic. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus (1) with diabetic neuropathy (2), hemiplegia (3) and hemiparesis (4) following cerebral infarction (5). Resident #3's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/12/20, coded Resident #3 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Resident #3 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. Section M of the assessment coded Resident #3 as receiving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined facility staff failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice, for two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #20, and #99. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician order for the use of an incentive spirometer for Resident #20 and Resident #99 and failed to store incentive spirometers for both residents in a sanitary manner. The finding include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to atrial fibrillation (2), obstructive sleep apnea (3) and congestive heart failure (4). Resident #20's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/05/2019, coded Resident #20 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined facility staff failed to provide a complete dialysis (1) communication plan for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #20. The finding include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to end stage renal disease (2) atrial fibrillation (3), obstructive sleep apnea (4) and congestive heart failure (5). Resident #20's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/05/2019, coded Resident #20 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O of the assessment documented Resident #20 receiving dialysis. On 1/22/20 at approximately 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #20. Resident #20 stated that he went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that one of 40 residents in the survey sample; Resident #67, was free of a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility staff made two medication errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. The facility staff failed to administer medications correctly, resulting in medication errors for Resident #67. The facility staff crushed the resident's Aspirin EC (1) (enteric coated) Delayed Release 81 mg (milligrams) tablet; and crushed the resident's Potassium Chloride ER (2) (extended release) 10 meq (milliequivalent) tablet. The findings include: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, high blood pressure, heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, oxygen dependence, insomnia, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, depression, hypothyroidism,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that one of 40 residents in the survey sample; Resident #67, was free of a significant medication error. The facility staff crushed the Resident #67's Potassium Chloride ER (2) (extended release) 10 meq (milliequivalent) tablet, resulting in a medication error that could cause adverse effects, including death. The findings include: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, high blood pressure, heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, oxygen dependence, insomnia, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, depression, hypothyroidism, diabetes, asthma, and obstructive sleep apnea. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/13/19 coded the resident as being cognitively intact in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain consent and/or provide education regarding the pneumococcal vaccine for one of five residents in the immunization record review, Residents # 89. The findings include: Resident # 89 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to high blood pressure, seasonal allergies and dementia [1]. Resident # 98's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/01/2020, coded Resident # 98 as scoring a three on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Under Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs Resident # 98 was coded as not being offered the pneumococcal vaccine. A review of the Resident # 98's clinical record and EHR [electronic health record] failed to evidence a consent to receive or any education for the pneumococcal vaccine. On 10/02/19 at 4:45 p.m., an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-09-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post daily nurse staffing information on 09/14/2021 and 09/15/2021. On 9/14/21 the staff posting in the front lobby was dated August 23, 2021 and on 9/15/21 the staff posting in the front lobby was dated 9/14/21. The findings include: On 09/14/2021 at 11:25 a.m., an observation conducted on the facility's Clairmont and Fairview units failed to evidence the nurse staff information. At 11:35 a.m., an observation of the facility's lobby revealed a staff posting dated August 23, 2021. On 09/15/21 at 10:15 a.m., an observation conducted on the facility's Clairmont and Fairview units failed to evidence the daily nurse staffing information. At 10:20 a.m., an observation of the facility's lobby revealed a staff posting dated August 14, 2021. On 09/15/21 at 2:41 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA [certified nursing assistant] # 3, staffing coordinator. When asked about the posting of the daily nurse staffing CNA # 3 stated that it is posted in the lobby and on the wall on each unit. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to complete an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 96. The discharge MDS assessment, with an assessment reference date of 8/12/2021, coded Resident #96, in Section A2100 - Discharge Status, as 03 indicating the resident was discharged to an acute care hospital. The clinical record documented the resident was discharged and picked up by private transport. The findings include: Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: atrial fibrillation (a condition characterized by rapid and random contraction of the atria of the heart causing irregular beats of the ventricles and resulting in decreased heart output and frequently clot formation in the atria)(1), depression and cirrhosis of the liver (chronic disease condition of the liver in which fibrous tissue and modules…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COONS, AMANDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/06/2018 |
| ALESANTRINO, JOE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/01/2019 |
| PETRINE, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/05/2005 |
| TUCKER, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2007 |
| COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/26/2006 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $907K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-03-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.