Manassas Health And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 271 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.485 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, family interview, clinical record review, and facility document reviews, it has been determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect when they neglected to properly assess, monitor, treat, and consult a physician or practitioner for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #15, closed record review) in the survey sample who was unresponsive and presented with respiratory distress, which constituted harm. The findings include: For Resident #15, the facility neglected to properly administer supplemental oxygen, assess, and monitor during signs and symptoms of respiratory distress for approximately two (2) hours before calling 911. Resident #15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The resident was discharged from the nursing facility, admitted to the local hospital on [DATE], and did not return to the nursing facility. Resident #15 diagnoses included dementia, left lower leg cellulitis, anxiety, and allergic rhinitis.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) report, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assess, monitor, and appropriately treat an unresponsive resident who presented with respiratory distress for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #15, closed record review) in the survey sample, which constituted harm. The findings include: For Resident #15, the facility failed to properly administer supplemental oxygen, assess, and monitor an unresponsive resident including vital signs and signs and symptoms of hypoxia for approximately 2 hours before calling 911. Resident #15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The resident was discharged from the nursing facility, admitted to the local hospital on [DATE], and did not return to the nursing facility. Resident #15 diagnoses included dementia, left lower leg cellulitis, anxiety, and allergic rhinitis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to dispose of refuse properly. The facility staff failed to maintain a clean dumpster area during the facility task- kitchen observation 1/20/26 at 11:50 AM. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 11:50 AM, an observation was conducted in the dumpster area outside of the kitchen. On the left side of the dumpster on the ground there were blue and white gloves and plastic straw.An interview was conducted on 1/20/26 at 1:10 PM with OSM #1, the dining services director. When asked about the findings, OSM #1 stated, we only wear black gloves. I will talk with housekeeping about it. It sounds like trash from the facility.On 1/21/26 at 11:00 AM ASM (administrator staff member) #1, the administrator was informed of the above concerns.The facility does not have a policy related to the dumpster.No further information was provided prior to exit.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for two of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6 and Resident #35.The findings include:1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan to administer pain medication as ordered. Pain level parameters for the administration of Hydromorphone (1) were not followed during administration during dates in December 2025 and January 2026. The comprehensive care plan for R6 documented in part, Patient has pain or potential for pain. Date Initiated: 11/07/2025. Under Interventions it documented in part, Administer pain medication as ordered. Report s/s (signs/symptoms) potential negative side effects. Date Initiated: 11/07/2025 . Report breakthrough pain and/or unrelieved pain for further assessment and treatment. Date Initiated: 11/07/2025.On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), a significant change assessment with an assessment reference date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical review, the facility staff failed to provide activities to promote the highest level of wellbeing for three of 43 residents in the survey sample, Residents #24, #17, and #72.The findings include:1. For Resident #24 (R24), the facility staff failed to provide activities to promote the resident's highest level of wellbeing in December 2025 and January 2026.On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/2/25, R24 was coded as having both short term and long term memory problems. She was coded as preferring the following activities: snacks between meals, reading books/newspapers/magazines, listening to music, and doing things with groups of people. On 1/20/26 at 12:57 p.m., R24 was observed sitting up in bed in her room on the memory care unit. The resident was being fed by a staff member who was seated in a chair next to the bed. On 1/20/26 at 2:43 p.m., R24 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 10:55 AM, an observation was conducted in the kitchen with the following findings: walk-in refrigerator #1, opened and undated five-pound bag of hash browns; walk-in refrigerator #2, one half chicken salad sandwich dated (prep 1/16/26 at 1:39 PM, expires 1/18/26 at 1:39 PM). An interview was conducted with OSM #1, the dining services director as the tour was being conducted, asked about opened and undated hash browns as well as the expired chicken salad sandwich OSM #1 stated, they should not be in there. I am throwing both of them out now. On 1/21/26 at 11:00 AM ASM (administrator staff member) #1, the administrator was informed of the above concerns.A review of the facility's Safe Food and Supply Storage policy revealed, Leftover prepared foods must be stored in approved containers, zip lock bags or wrapped with plastic wrap, be labeled as to contents and dated with a 'Use By' date.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure dignity for one of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #133. The findings include:For Resident #133 (R133), the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's incontinence brief was not exposed and visible from the hall. R133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A nursing admission assessment signed by a nurse on 1/13/26 documented R133 was only oriented to self. On 1/20/26 at 12:45 p.m., R133 was observed lying in bed, only wearing an incontinence brief. The resident was visible from the hall. On 1/20/26 at 2:25 p.m., 1/21/26 at 3:55 p.m., and 1/22/26 at 10:41 a.m., R133 was observed lying in bed with a gown pulled above the resident's waist. The resident's incontinence brief was exposed and visible from the hall. On 1/22/26 at 10:54 a.m., an interview was conducted with CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #8 (the CNA caring for R133). CNA #8 stated she had pulled the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure all discharge needs were met prior to discharge from the facility for one of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #136.The findings include:For Resident #136 (R136), the facility staff failed to ensure needed durable medical equipment (DME), a bedside commode, was delivered to the residents home prior to discharging them from the facility to reside independently in a multi-level home with a bathroom located up 13 steps on the second level when they were unable to negotiate stairs. On the admission minimum data set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/12/2023, R136 was assessed as requiring partial/moderate assistance for bathing, upper body dressing, and standing from a sitting position, requiring substantial/maximal assistance of a helper for toileting and lower body dressing. Toilet transfers and walking were not attempted due to medical condition or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #133. The findings include:For Resident #133 (R133), the facility staff failed to dress the resident in clothes on 1/20/26, 1/21/26, and 1/22/26. R133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A nursing admission assessment signed by a nurse on 1/13/26 documented R133 was only oriented to self. On 1/20/26 at 12:45 p.m., R133 was observed lying in bed, only wearing an incontinence brief. The resident was visible from the hall. On 1/20/26 at 2:25 p.m., 1/21/26 at 3:55 p.m., and 1/22/26 at 10:41 a.m., R133 was observed lying in bed with a gown pulled above the resident's waist. The resident's incontinence brief was exposed and visible from the hall. On 1/22/26 at 10:54 a.m., an interview was conducted with CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #8 (the CNA caring for R133). CNA #8 stated she had pulled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent a decrease in mobility for one of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #35.The findings include:For Resident #35 (R35), the facility staff failed to ambulate as recommended by physical therapy and care plan interventions to prevent a decrease in mobility.On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/24/2025, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment, indicating they were cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The assessment documented use of a wheelchair and walking not attempted due to the residents medical condition or safety concerns. It documented no therapy services received during the assessment period.On 1/20/2026 at 2:05 PM, an interview was conducted with R35 who stated that they had recently been discharged from physical therapy (PT). R35 stated that their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program for one of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6.The findings include:For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to follow pain level parameters for the administration of hydromorphone (1). On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), a significant change assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/17/2025, the resident 14 out of 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment, indicating they were cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J documented R6 receiving scheduled and as needed pain medication and having almost constant pain.On 1/20/2026 at 2:57 PM, an interview was conducted with R6 who stated that they had chronic pain and took medication every four hours as needed. R6 stated that the medication helped when they had knee pain. The physician orders for R6 documented in part, Hydromorphone HCl Tablet 4 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to honor a Family Member/Responsible Party's verbalized choice for a transfer from the facility to the hospital or to another facility for 1 of 3 resident's (Resident #13) reviewed for participation in treatment options which resulted in the responsible party physically removing the resident from the facility. The findings included: Resident #13 was originally admitted to the facility 8/30/23 for rehabilitation services after a left hip fracture and surgical repair. The admission diagnoses included; fracture of left femur and a stroke with left hemiparesis. The resident was transferred from the facility on 8/31/23 therefore a closed record review was conducted. The resident had not been admitted to the facility long enough for the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to be completed therefore the following information was obtained from the Admission/readmission Nursing Collection Tool dated 8/30/23. The tool revealed the resident was oriented to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,376 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,188 — penalty dated 2024-02-13
• $8,188 — penalty dated 2024-02-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $959K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA