Potomac Falls Health & Rehab Center
46531 Harry Byrd Highway, Sterling, VA 20164 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (703) 834-5800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 4 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.9% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 18.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.8% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.7% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.9% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.3% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 73.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.0% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.3% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 399 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 34.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 202 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.3%CMS range 55.2–64.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 8.8–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 34.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 29.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.8–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 146.9 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2017-03-23 · tag F0323 — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide an environment that was free of hazards to prevent accidents for 13 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident's #12, #18, #19, #20, #21, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, and #32 resulting in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy. The facility staff failed to ensure safe coffee temperatures on 6/23/16 to prevent an avoidable accident for Resident #18 resulting in second degree abdominal burns after spilling hot coffee on self, and on 3/22/17 during this survey coffee served to Resident's #12, #19, #20, #21, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, and #32 during the lunchtime meal in all four dining rooms was identified at temperatures sufficient to cause tissue injury and third degree burns resulting in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings included: On 3/22/17 at approximately 12:15 p.m. after completing food temperatures in the main facility kitchen the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2017-03-23 · tag F0309 — isolatedProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services for a 2nd degree abdominal burn in a timely manner to maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing for 1 of 47 resident in the survey sample, Resident #18. The facility staff failed to properly assess, and follow Physician orders to obtain a Wound Consult following a 2nd degree abdominal burn from a hot coffee spill on 6/23/16 resulting in a 7 day delay in treatment for Resident #18, which constitutes harm. The findings include: Resident #18 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility initially on 6/10/05 and current admission date of 5/20/14 with diagnoses to include Seizures (1), Hemiplegia (2), Dysphagia (3), and Epilepsy (4). The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/16. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 13 out of a possible 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the preference of the resident for staff not to pull on her arms/shoulders which introduced pain during bed mobility and transfers for 1 of 45 residents (Resident #39), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility 4/30/21 and has not been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; postpolio syndrome, chronic pain and multiple rotator cuff repairs. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/26/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #39's cognitive abilities for daily decision making was intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, extensive assistance of one person with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 45 residents (Resident #74) in the survey sample were free of significant medication error. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the following significant medication (Pregabalin) was administered to Resident #74 on 11/27/21 (3-11 shift) and 11/28/21 (7-3 and 3-11 shift). Resident #74 was admitted to the nursing facility on 10/18/21. Diagnosis for Resident #74 included but not limited to Fibromyalgia and fracture of right fibula. Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/23/21 coded Resident #74's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 13 out of a possible score of 15 indicating no cognitive skills for daily decision-making. Resident #74's person-centered care plan with a revision date 10/25/21 documented resident has pain or potential for pain due to recent fall with fracture and skin breakdown. The goal set for the resident by the staff is to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 1 out of 4 facility medication carts and 1 out of 2 medication refrigerators. The facility staff failed to ensure one Lantus insulin pen and antibiotic eye drop (Neo/poly ointment) were dated once opened. The facility staff failed to ensure a multi-dose vial of PPD vaccine was dated once opened. The findings included: A. On 12/30/21 at approximately 2:20 p.m., the medication cart on Alleghery Unit (cart 1) was inspected with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #4. Stored inside the medication cart was an open Lantus (insulin) pen and antibiotic eye drop (Neo/poly ointment) without an open date. The LPN was asked, When was the insulin pen and antibiotic eye drops open she replied, I have no way of knowing since they (insulin and eye drop) does not have a date indicating when they were open. The LPN said, since the insulin and eye drops do not have an open date, they need to be thrown away and a new insulin pen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide evidence that two out of 45 residents were invited to attend a care plan meeting, Resident #47 and Resident #120, in the survey sample. The findings included; 1. Resident #47 was originally admitted to the facility 11/26/19 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Fracture of Upper and Lower End of the Right Fibula and Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Valve. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/06/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #47 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance with one person assistance with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accommodate the preference of the resident to have showers prior to 6:00 p.m., for 1 of 45 residents (Resident #39), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility 4/30/21 and has not been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; postpolio syndrome, chronic pain and multiple rotator cuff repairs. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/26/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #39's cognitive abilities for daily decision making was intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, extensive assistance of one person with personal hygiene, bathing, and dressing, limited assistance of one person with locomotion and supervision of one person with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #61 the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. Resident #61 was re- admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for this resident included kidney failure, epilepsy and idiopathic neuropathy. Resident #61 was assessed as having a BIMS score of 13. A Care Plan dated 10/05/21 indicated this resident Focus- was at risk for unresolved pain and multiple medical problems. Goals- Interventions- Assess for side effects of pain medication. observe for constipation: new onset or increased agitation, restlessness, confusion, hallucinations, dysphoria, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and falls. During an interview on 12/02/21 at 12:36 PM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) she was asked if Resident #61 or his Representative had been offered the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. The ADON stated, not to her knowledge. 4. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #32 with the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. Resident #32 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Medicare Beneficiary Notices in accordance with applicable Federal regulations, were issued to 2 of 3 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #98) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letter to Resident #7 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining. Resident #7 was admitted to the nursing facility on 05/28/21. Diagnosis for Resident #7 included but not limited to Cerebral Infarction (stroke) with left hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) a significant change with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 08/25/21 coded Resident #7 a 04 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification provided by the facility was noted that Resident #7 was not issued a SNF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of hospital discharges for 2 of 45 residents (Resident #45 and 106) in the survey sample. The findings included; Resident #45 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; End Stage Renal Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/05/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #45 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring supervision set-up only with bed mobility, supervision on and off the unit, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Requiring one person physical assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to offer a bed hold for 1 of 45 Residents, Resident #45. The findings included: For Resident #45 the facility failed to offer the Resident a bed hold when they were discharged to a local hospital. Resident #45 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; End Stage Renal Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/05/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #45 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring supervision set-up only with bed mobility, supervision on and off the unit, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Requiring one person physical assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to complete the required discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required timeframe after a planned discharge from the facility for 1of 45 residents (Resident #2), in the survey sample. The findings included; Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility 7/7/21 and had never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; gastrointestinal upset related Pancolitis new cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/13/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #2's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact On 12/1/21, during the finalization of the sample the Resident Assessment task triggered for review. It revealed the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) identified Resident #2 hadn't had a MDS assessment submitted to the MDS databank for more than 120 calendar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to ensure the one resident (Resident #93's) Dialysis communication book was updated timely during Dialysis treatments in a survey sample of 43 residents. The findings included: Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced fracture of first cervical vertebra, osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, diabetes, hypothyroidism, stage 5 chronic kidney disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, type III traumatic spondylolisthesis of seventh cervical vertebra and dependence of renal dialysis. Resident #93 was involved in an accident while being transported to her dialysis appointment on 11/19/21. Resident #93's dialysis communication book had not been updated since 11/19/21. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed this resident in the area of Speech, Vision and Hearing as being able to understand others. In the area of Cognitive Patterns this resident was assessed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to store food under sanitary conditions. The finding included; On 12/01/21 at approximately 11:00 AM., during a follow up visit to the kitchen with OSM/CDM (Other Staff Member/Certified Dietary Manager) #5. An inspection of the dairy cooler was made. Located inside of the dairy cooler were multiple cartons of milk and spilled milk with a strong odor. The CDM stated, A staff member normally keep the cooler clean but due to the Thanksgiving holiday it was not cleaned. He usually cleans it once a week. On 12/02/21 at approximately 3:20 p.m., the above findings were shared with the Administrator, The Corporate Consultant, The Social Services Coordinator and The Corporate Clinical Services Specialist. An opportunity was offered to the facility's staff to present additional information but no additional information was provided.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 45 residents (Resident #74) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #74's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was accurate for the administration of a scheduled pain medication Pregabalin. Resident #74 was admitted to the nursing facility on 10/18/21. Diagnosis for Resident #74 included but not limited to Fibromyalgia and fracture of right fibula. Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/23/21 coded Resident #74's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 13 out of a possible score of 15 indicating no cognitive skills for daily decision-making. Resident #74's person-centered care plan with a revision date 10/25/21 documented resident has pain or potential for pain due to recent fall with fracture and skin breakdown. The goal set for the resident by the staff is to maintain comfort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to have the call bell accessible and functional for resident's use. For 1 of 45 residents (Resident #47), in the survey sample. The Findings included; Resident #47 was originally admitted to the facility [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Fracture of Upper and Lower End of the Right Fibula and Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Valve. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #47cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance one person assistance with bed mobility, dressing eating, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review and facility documents the facility staff failed to provide for the accommodation of needs to maintain independence and to ensure the safety for 1 of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #154. For Resident #154, he facility staff failed to ensure the call bell was placed within reach. The findings included: Resident # 154 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include contusion of the lung, multiple fractures of ribs S/P fall, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Epilepsy, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, frontal lobe and executive deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) had not been due/completed. Information was gathered from the Resident's baseline Care Plan. Focus: Name (Resident # 154) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Demonstrates the need for ADL assistance r/t (related to) multiple rib fracture, s/p (status post)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to notify one of 40 residents (Resident #19) of a change in roommate. The facility staff failed to inform Resident #19 in advance, of a roommate change of a resident that was transferred to his room from another unit in the facility. The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the nursing facility on 7/23/13 with diagnoses that included paraplegia. The most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment was an annual assessment dated [DATE] and coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated no cognitive impairment. During an interview with Resident #19 on 10/10/18 at 10:40 a.m., he stated he had several roommates move in and out of his room and was never approached by anyone to let him know of the change in roommates. He stated the roommates were transferred into his room from another unit within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, record review, family interviews, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) prior to discharge for 1 of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #148. The facility staff failed to issue a Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage prior to Resident #148's discharge that was facility planned on 8/8/17 however occurred on 8/9/17. The findings included: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Left Femur Fracture, Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia. On the facility admission Record Resident #148's son was listed as her Responsibility Party and Guardian. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/23/17. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 3 out of a possible 15 which indicated that Resident #148 was not cognitively intact and incapable of daily decision making. The last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of a hospital discharge for 1 of 40 residents (Resident #63) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #63's transfer to the emergency room (ER) from dialysis on 07/18/18. The finding included: Resident #63 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #63 included but not limited to *End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/18 coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated no cognitive impairment. The Discharge MDS assessments was dated for 07/18/18, discharge return anticipated, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 07/18/18, according to the facility's documentation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure one (Resident #146) of 40 residents in the survey sample had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Resident #146's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was coded that she was discharged to the hospital rather than discharged home. The findings included: Resident #146 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Kidney Disease and Congestive Heart Failure. The most recent MDS assessment was a Discharge with an Assessment Reference date of 8/28/18. Under Section A Type of Assessment Resident #146 was coded as 10/1 ( Discharge assessment-return not anticipated), planned. Under A 2100 Discharge Status Resident #146 was coded as 03 (discharge to acute hospital). Resident #146's progress note dated 8/28/18 at 11:26 A.M. was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: pt. (patient) left the facility at 11:00 to home accompanied by her daughter. pt.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, record review, family interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan to include discharge goals and interventions for 1 of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #148. The facility staff failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan to include discharge goals and interventions for Resident #148 The findings included: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Left Femur Fracture, Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia. On the facility admission Record Resident #148's son was listed as her Responsibility Party and Guardian. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/23/17. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 3 out of a possible 15 which indicated that Resident #148 was not cognitively intact and incapable of daily decision making. The last Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, record review, family interviews, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility failed to involve the resident and resident representative in the final discharge plan for 1 of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #148. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #148's son was involved in the final discharge plan scheduled on 8/8/17. The findings included: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Left Femur Fracture, Atrial Fibrillation and Dementia. On the facility admission Record Resident #148's son was listed as her Responsibility Party and Guardian. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/23/17. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 3 out of a possible 15 which indicated that Resident #148 was no cognitively intact and incapable of daily decision making. The last Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide personal care to include showers for two resident in the survey sample of 40 (Resident #61 and 63) who were unable to independently carry out activities of daily living (ADL's). 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #61 received showers according to resident plan and preference. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #63 received showers according to resident plan and preference. The findings include: 1. Resident #61 was originally re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #61 included but not limited to *Anxiety disorder and *Cardiomyopathy. Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/24/18 coded Resident #61's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 15 out of a possible score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #61 total dependence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to receives the appropriate care and services to prevent potential indwelling catheter complications for 1 of 40 residents (Resident #48), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to anchor Resident #48's indwelling urinary catheter to prevent tension on the catheter and avoid potential kinking of the tubing. The findings included: Resident #48 was originally admitted to the facility 8/9/18 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; urinary retention with bilateral hydronephrosis (kidney swelling due to urine failing to drain properly). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/16/18 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #48's cognitive abilities for daily decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 40 residents (Resident #53 and #63) received the care and services consistent with the standards of practice and comprehensive person-centered care plan. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure hemodialysis care was provided for Resident #53 to include consistent and accurate assessments of *bruit and *thrill by the licensed nurses. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure hemodialysis care was provided to Resident #63 to include consistent assessments of bruit and thrill, as well as communication between the facility and dialysis center. The findings included: 1. Resident #53 was re-admitted to the nursing facility on 11/7/17 with a diagnosis that included end stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was an annual and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 6 out of a possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure the licensed nursing staff were competent with the appropriate skills to provide assessments of Arterio-Venous (AV) dialysis shunts for 2 of 40 residents (#53 and #63) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure the licensed nursing staff were competent in the provision of hemodialysis care for Resident #53 to include accurate assessments of *bruit and *thrill. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure the licensed nursing staff were competent in the provision of hemodialysis care for Resident #63 to include accurate assessments of bruit and thrill. The findings included: 1. Resident #53 was re-admitted to the nursing facility on 11/7/17 with a diagnosis that included end stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was an annual and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review and review of facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure hand washing after removal of gloves during accuchecks (a fingerstick for blood glucose testing) for 2 of 40 residents (Resident #53 and #13) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure hand washing after the removal of gloves during the accucheck procedure for Resident #53. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure hand washing after the removal of gloves during the accucheck procedure for Resident #13. The finding include: 1. Resident #53 was re-admitted to the nursing facility on 11/7/17 with a diagnosis that included diabetes. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was an annual and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 6 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident was severely impaired in the skills needed for daily decision making. The resident was coded to be an insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2017-03-23 · tag F0371 — widespreadStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store and prepare foods in a sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to ensure an open 25 pound bag of panko (bread crumbs) was stored in a sealed container to prevent physical contaminants from inadvertently entering the food, failed to ensure an open date and use by dated was placed on a 35 ounce open bag of toasted oats, and failed to ensure two deep fryer baskets were free from cross-contamination that were in contact with a trash can. The findings included: On 3/21/17 at 2:40 p.m. a Kitchen/Food Service tour was conducted with the Director of Dietary Services. During the kitchen tour the following observations were made: 1. In the Dry Storage Room an open unsealed 25 pound bag of panko (bread crumbs) with an opened of date of 2/14/17 and use by date of 5/14/17 with only a piece of loose plastic wrap lying over the opening of the bag was observed. 2. In the Dry Storage Room an opened 35 ounce bag of toasted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-03-23 · tag F0250 — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide medically related social services for 1 out of 15 residents as evidenced by the facility choosing not to follow the wishes of the legal power of attorney (POA) but following the wishes of the non-POA for her mother's diet. The findings included: Resident #115 was originally admitted to the facility 3/14/07 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; dementia, legal blindness, diabetes, stroke with right hemiparesis, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, hypertension, glaucoma and macular degeneration. The clinical record also contained a document dated 1/16/17 and signed by a physician stated; given level of patient's impairment, in my opinion, she lacks capacity to manage her own medical and financial matters. Based on the preceding information the Durable Power of Attorney (POA), appointed 9/12/07 was initiated. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/31/17 coded the resident as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-03-23 · tag F0252 — patternProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interview, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean comfortable homelike environment in 3 of 8 resident shower rooms. On 3/22/17 at approximately 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. during the General Observation tour of the facility the surveyor observed the following items: Soiled Shower rooms (3B, 2B, 2A) On 3/22/17 during the General Observation tour of the facility from 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. 3B Resident Shower Room was observed soiled. Used towels were observed lying in the shower room. The Shower room bench was observed with torn rough edges on the padded seat. On 3/22/17 during the General Observation tour of the facility from 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. 2B shower room was observed to be soiled. A used towel was observed lying in the shower room. The shower room bench was observed with torn rough edges. On 3/22/17 during the General Observation tour of the facility from 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. 2A shower room was observed to be soiled. A used brief was observed on the floor and a used glove was observed on the floor. Used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-03-23 · tag F0441 — patternHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that a single use wound care product was discarded after resident use for 1 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3, and failed to prevent the potential for the transmission of infection with the storage of clean supplies. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that a single use Calcium Alginate Wound care product was discarded after wound care was completed on Resident #3. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure the storage of clean supplies in a manner to prevent the potential for transmission of infection. The findings included: 1. Resident #3 was a [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Multiple Sclerosis (1), Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (2), and Paraplegia (3). The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a Significant Change with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/3/17. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 14 out of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2017-03-23 · tag F0498 — patternMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure continuing competency of nursing aides with training hours no less than 12 hours a year. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that five out of 46 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) had completed at least 12 hours of training per year per hire anniversary date for each CNA. The findings included: On 3/23/17, the facility documentation was reviewed. A list of 46 CNAs with training hours per hire anniversary year was reviewed. Five out of 46 CNAs did not have at least 12 hours of training since their one year hire anniversary date. Also training transcripts were reviewed for all 46 CNAs. The training transcripts documented the course topic and the amount of hours completed for each CNA. The hours were totaled by two surveyors and five CNAs were below 12 hours within the year of the hire anniversary date. On 3/23/17 at approximately 4:15 p.m., a human resource staff member (Others #4) was interviewed. Others #4 explained that it was the responsibility of the Unit Managers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-03-23 · tag F0157 — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to notify the physician and or designee and the Power of Attorney of a change in physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #115. The facility staff failed to notify the physician and or designee and the Power of Attorney that Resident #115 was not receiving the dietary supplement (Pure Aloe Force) as ordered by the physician and the resident was refusing the anti-platelet medication Aggrenox. Aggrenox is used to reduce the risk of stroke in people who have had blood clots or a mini-stroke. The findings included: Resident #115 was originally admitted to the facility 3/14/07 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute hospital stay. The current diagnoses included: stroke with right hemiparesis, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and dementia. The clinical record also contained a document dated 1/16/17 and signed by a physician which stated; given level of patient's impairment, in my opinion, she lacks capacity to manage her own medical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-03-23 · tag F0246 — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, staff and group interviews, the facility staff failed to provide laundry services with reasonable accommodations for one resident, Resident #17, in the survey sample of 47 residents. the findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 7/1/15 with diagnoses which included hypertension, neurogenic bladder, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder and depression. The facility staff failed to return Resident #17's laundry after 23 days. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed this resident as having adequate hearing, clear speech, makes self understood, able to understand and having adequate visions. This resident was assessed as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. This resident was assessed as having no behaviors. In the area of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) this resident was assessed as requiring extensive assistance in the area of dressing. In the area of personal hygiene this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-03-23 · tag F0328 — isolatedProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure the safe storage and transportation of oxygen cylinders. On 3/22/17 at approximately 10:10 a.m., during the General Observation Tour with the Assistant Administrator and the Director of Maintenance one full small oxygen cylinder was observed in the oxygen storage room, stored standing on boxes of supplies and not secured in a rack to prevent the cylinder from the potential of becoming airborne if it were to fall. The Oxygen Storage Room was observed not being directly beside or across from a resident room. During the observation of the oxygen cylinder, the Maintenance Director placed the one cylinder into the storage rack for oxygen cylinders. On 3/23/17 at approximately 12:55 p.m., a Physical Therapy Assistant #3 was observed walking out of the Rehabilitation gym carrying one empty small oxygen tank in her left hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2017-03-23 · tag F0518 — isolatedTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that all staff were trained in emergency procedures, specifically use of a fire extinguisher. On 3/22/17 at approximately 11:20 a.m. a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was questioned on use of a fire extinguisher. The CNA #1 stated that to use a fire extinguisher she would take the extinguisher out of the wall unit, then squeeze the handle and aim at the bottom of the fire. When CNA #1 was asked what she would do if nothing came out of the nozzle when she squeezed the handle, she had no response. When CNA #1 was asked what she would do if she was not able to squeeze that handle, CNA had no response. The CNA and surveyor were standing in front of an extinguisher while questions were asked. Answers to PULL THE PIN were written on the extinguisher. CNA never was able to state, Pull the Pin to get the fire extinguisher to work. A copy of CNAs education completed on the computer system (type of training) was provided by the facility, and it did not document that Fire Safety had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOVA CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/30/2010 |
| BDSHEFFER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 09/30/2010 |
| DJ PETRINE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 09/30/2010 |
| GOODALL, LURY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 09/30/2010 |
| STALLARD, PATRICIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 09/30/2010 |
| TUCKER, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 7% | since 09/30/2010 |
| WHITE, BRENDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/16/2020 |
| ALESANTRINO, JOE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2019 |
| PETRINE, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/09/2010 |
| COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/30/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495179. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2021-12-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.