Dinwiddie Health And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 227 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a safe transfer using a mechanical lift resulting in a fall with fractures for one of eight residents in the survey sample (Resident #1).The findings include:Facility staff failed to attach a mechanical lift sling according to facility and manufacturer's recommendations during a transfer of Resident #1 from the bed to a wheelchair. Resident #1 slid out of the sling during the transfer causing fracture of the resident's shoulder (proximal left humerus) and left wrist (harm).Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), left side hemiplegia, hypothyroidism, chronic pain, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, hearing loss, epilepsy, polyneuropathy, insomnia and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 as cognitively intact and as totally dependent upon staff for bed mobility and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care regarding wound documentation for one of thirteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #6). The findings include: Facility staff failed to document an assessment for Resident #6's wound that included measurements, appearance, description, and/or status of a wound. Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included femur fracture, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, end stage renal disease, anemia, coronary artery disease, cancer, congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R6 as cognitively intact. R6's closed clinical record documented a care concern form dated 11/23/24 listing that the resident was assessed with a new skin impairment. The form categorized the wound as other and documented unstageable to right lower leg. A nursing note dated 11/23/24 documented,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform timely neurological assessments following an unwitnessed fall for one of thirteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #10). The findings include: Resident #10 had no neurological checks initiated immediately following an unwitnessed fall to assess for possible head injury. Resident #10 (R10) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, depression, dementia with severe agitation, cognitive communication deficit and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed with severely impaired cognitive skills. R10's closed clinical record also documented a nursing note dated 7/8/24 at 11:45 p.m. stating, .resident has been aggressive and agitated all shift . rounded on her q [every] 30 mins [minutes] due to her trying to get out of bed. while in room she was sitting on side of bed with feet on floor and put herself on fall mat . A post-fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of thirteen residents in the survey sample was free from a significant medication error (Resident #8). The findings include: Resident #8 was administered one dose of oxycodone 30 mg (milligrams) extended-release when the physician's order required an immediate release 20 mg dose. Resident #8 (R8) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes with peripheral angiopathy, below knee amputation, anemia and hypertension. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R8 as cognitively intact. R8's closed clinical record documented a physician's order dated 4/22/24 for oxycodone 20 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain (prn). The clinical record documented a physician's order dated 5/17/24 for oxycodone 30 mg extended-release with instructions for one tablet every 12 hours for pain management. R8's medication administration record (MAR) documented licensed practical nurse (LPN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to properly store a controlled medication for one of thirteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #7) The findings include: Resident #7 (R7) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and gout. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R7 as cognitively intact. R7's closed clinical record documented a physician's order dated 6/9/24 for the medication Tramadol 50 mg (milligrams) with instructions to give two tablets every 6 hours as needed for pain management. Review of a medication error report sheet dated 6/14/24 documented that on 6/13/24, licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3 signed out one tablet of Tramadol for R7. The report documented LPN #3 did not administer the medication to R7 and left the medicine unsecured in the medication cart. The controlled drug count sheet for R7's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for two of thirteen residents in the survey sample (Residents #8 and #10). The findings include: 1. There was no documentation in Resident #8's clinical record that the resident was administered an incorrect dose of the medication oxycodone. R8's closed clinical record documented a physician's order dated 4/22/24 for oxycodone 20 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain (prn). The clinical record documented a physician's order dated 5/17/24 for oxycodone 30 mg extended-release with instructions for one tablet every 12 hours for pain management. R8's medication administration record (MAR) documented administration of oxycodone 20 mg on 6/10/24 at 3:40 p.m. for pain rated 8 out of 10 (scale with 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). A medication error report dated 6/11/24 documented LPN #3 administered an oxycodone 30 mg extended-release tablet instead of the ordered 20 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during a medication pass observation on one of three units (200 hall). The findings include: On 1/14/25 at 8:00 a.m., a medication pass observation was conducted with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #6 administering medications to Resident #5 (R5). Among the medications administered was a docusate sodium gel cap 100 mg (milligrams). When removing the capsule from the pharmacy packaging, LPN #6 dropped the capsule in the floor. LPN #6 put on gloves, picked up the capsule, placed it in a medicine cup, and stated since the capsule was gel, he would rinse it off with water. LPN #6 took the gel cap to the sink in R5's room, quickly rinsed the capsule with running water, drained remaining water from the cup, and proceeded to administer the docusate sodium gel cap to R5. When questioned, LPN #6 stated that he rinsed the gel cap because there were no over-the counter medications on the cart and the water would not hurt the gel covering.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to submit a demand bill, as requested on the SNF ABN notice (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) issued to 2 Residents (Resident #4- R4 and Resident #36- R36) in a survey sample of 3 Residents, reviewed for such notices. The findings included: For R4 and R36, the facility staff failed to continue skilled therapy services and submit a claim to Medicare for a coverage decision, as the resident and/or their representatives requested on the SNF ABN form. On 2/5/24, the facility administration was asked to provide the NOMNC (notice of Medicare non-coverage) and SNF ABN forms provided to R4 and R36. These notices were received and reviewed. Review of the forms and clinical record of each resident revealed the following: 1. According to the clinical record, R4 was receiving skilled therapy services from 11/29/23-12/21/23. On 12/19/23, R4 was issued a NOMNC and SNF ABN. R4 selected option 1 which read, I want the care listed above. I want Medicare to be billed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for 3 Residents (Resident #18- R18, Resident #210-R210, and Resident #211-R211) in a survey sample of 37 Residents and for 2 employees in a sample of 25 staff records reviewed. The findings included: 1. For R18, R210, and R211, all who reported allegations of abuse, the facility staff failed to report the allegations of abuse to the required agencies, failed to have evidence of an investigation being conducted and for R210 and R211, failed to take measures to protect the residents while an investigation is being conducted. On 2/6/24 and 2/7/24, a review was conducted of facility documents to include allegations of abuse. The documents revealed the following: a. On 3/8/23, R18 reported an allegation of verbal abuse from a staff member, CNA #2. On 3/8/23, the facility administrator notified the state survey agency and the ombudsman, but did not notify adult protective services, of the allegation. Once an investigation was conducted, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to change insulin administration times as ordered by physician for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample (Resident #33). A provider approved pharmacy recommendation to change Resident #33's Humulin insulin administration times was not implemented for over three months. The findings include: Resident #33 (R33) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, diabetes, congestive heart failure, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R33 with severely impaired cognitive skills. R33's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 11/21/23 for Humulin 70/30 insulin (100 units/milliliter) with instructions to administer 30 units two times per day for diabetes management. R33's medication administration record (MAR) documented the Humulin was scheduled/administered at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. each day.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to report to Adult Protective Services (APS) for 3 Residents (Resident #18- R18, Resident #210-R210, and Resident #211-R211) in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For R18, R210, and R211, all who reported allegations of abuse, the facility staff failed to report the allegations of abuse to APS and the results of an investigation. On 2/6/24 and 2/7/24, a review was conducted of facility documents to include allegations of abuse. The documents revealed the following: a. On 3/8/23, R18 reported an allegation of verbal abuse from a staff member, CNA #2. On 3/8/23, the facility administrator notified the state survey agency and the ombudsman, but did not notify adult protective services, of the allegation. Once an investigation was conducted, the administrator again notified the state survey agency and the ombudsman of the findings but didn't report to adult protective services, nor the department of health professions, since the allegation was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-09-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA