Martinsville Health And Rehab
1607 Spruce Street, Martinsville, VA 24112 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (276) 632-7146 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2019
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.6% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.3% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.1% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.6% | 20.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.2% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 10.6% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 1.52 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.90 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 6.9–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 5.2–15.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 85.4 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
70 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2019-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation clinical record review, Resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 30 residents in the survey sample was free from neglect, Resident #63 The findings included: During this inspector's interview with Resident #63, Resident #63 stated that she had lost a lot of blood and confirmed she had been readmitted to the hospital. Prior to this incident, the clinical record contained documentation that Resident #63 complained that her menstrual was on for a month. For that one month period of time where Resident #63 made her documented complaint known, there was no documentation that services were provided to intervene with her excessive vaginal bleeding. The physician was not notified so that an assessment could be made about any needed services. This lack of intervention led to Resident # 63 having a critical hemoglobin and hematocrit and being hospitalized with a diagnosis of menorrhea and anemia which required a blood transfusion. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 4 of 30 residents (Resident #40, #103, #47 and #316 and failed to assess and monitor for 2 of 25 residents (Resident #77 and #63) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to assess and monitor Resident # 63 for excessive vaginal bleeding, which lead to Resident # 63 having a critical hemoglobin and hematocrit and was subsequently admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of menorrhea and anemia and required a blood transfusion. Resident # 63 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 7/2/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anemia, abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding, paraplegia, and muscle weakness. The clinical record for Resident # 63 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 9:46 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 63 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, resident interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prevent accident hazards for 6 of 30 residents and in (1) oxygen storage room in the nursing facility (Resident #9, #63, #68, #314, #13 and #97). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 9 was positioned properly while in the lift, which resulted in Resident # 9 sliding out of the lift onto the floor and hitting her head on the foot rest of the lift. As a result of the fall, Resident # 9 experienced pain to the head and back and was transferred to the emergency room and was diagnosed with mechanical fall with head contusion, contusion to left hip and lumbar strain. This is harm. Resident # 9 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 9/10/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. The findings included:During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/12/26 at 11:50 am, surveyor observed a box of ground meat with a handwritten note that read, Out to thaw 01/05/26, use by 01/11/26. Surveyor pointed this out to dietary manager. Dietary manager stated they would discard the meat. Surveyor observed the dishwasher to have a dried, crusty substance on the top corners. Dietary manager stated they clean this substance off every day, and it's back the next morning. Surveyor observed the oven in the kitchen to have dried food substance on the front outside of the oven doors. Surveyor asked the dietary manager how often the ovens are cleaned, and dietary manager stated, Weekly.On a follow-up visit to the kitchen on 01/12/26 at 1:05 pm, surveyor observed certified nurse's aide (CNA) #1 standing in the kitchen prep area. Surveyor observed that CNA #1 did not have a hair covering over her hair. Surveyor asked dietary manager if CNA #1 should be wearing a hair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist documented their findings in the clinical records after completing drug regimen reviews for (5) five of (5) five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #9, and Resident #55. The findings included: The consultant pharmacist failed to document their findings regarding drug regimen reviews in the resident's clinical records. During clinical record reviews the survey team were unable to determine if the consultant pharmacist had made recommendations during their monthly drug regimen reviews. The pharmacist had only documented, chart review completed by consultant pharmacist. There was no reference regarding a recommendation being made or not made. On 01/13/2026 at 4:30 p.m., during an end of the day meeting with the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Nurse Consultant the issue with the incomplete records regarding drug regimen reviews was reviewed. The DON was able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, ombudsman interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #55. The findings included:For Resident #55 the facility staff failed to treat the resident with dignity and respect as evidenced by discussing her personal information with her roommate's family member.Resident #55's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories.Resident #55's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/30/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact.Resident #55's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained plans for Overweight/Obesity as related: Depression, Obese with BMI (body mass index) >30, (BMI 73.4) history of weight fluctuations with desire to lose weight. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to accommodate the resident's needs and preferences to get out of bed for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #55. The findings included:For Resident #55 the facility staff failed to accommodate the resident's preference to get out of bed.Resident #55's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories and bed confinement status.Resident #55's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/30/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact.Resident #55's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained plans for Overweight/Obesity as related: Depression, Obese with BMI (body mass index) >30, (BMI 73.4) history of weight fluctuations with desire to lose weight. Resident desires to lose weight of 100 lb., I am on a special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to honor resident's choices for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, resident #10. The findings included:For Resident #10 the facility staff failed to honor the resident's choice to have a shower in the morning instead of evening.Resident #10's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side.Resident #10's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/21/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section GG, functional abilities, coded the resident as needing partial/moderate assistance with bathing.Resident #10's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for Potential for Self-Care Deficit r/t (related to): Requires staff assistance with ADL's (activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to periodically review resident's advance directive information for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #50. The findings included:The facility staff failed to periodically review Resident #50's advance directive information with the resident and/or resident representative.Resident #50's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and dementia.Section C of Resident #50's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with and assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/13/25 was coded 00. Per the MDS manual a score of 00=severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision making.During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate any information to indicate Resident #50's advance directive information had been reviewed since 01/17/24. On 01/14/2026 at 9:00 a.m., during an interview with the Social Worker (SW) this staff stated they had not reviewed advance directive information with this resident due to their cognitive status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay for (1) one of (3) three sampled residents, Resident #20. The findings included: For Resident #20, the facility staff failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of the resident's Medicare covered Part A stay. Resident #20's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease-stage 3, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. Resident #20's last covered day of Medicare Part A services was [DATE]. A Notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide required documentation to receiving entity at time of transfer/discharge for (3) three of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4, Resident #80, and Resident #91. The findings included:1. For resident #4, the facility staff failed to provide documentation that the required information was provided to the receiving healthcare institution for a transfer that occurred on 9/1/2025 and a transfer that occurred 11/26/25. Resident #4's diagnoses included but were not limited to, a history of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body) as well as dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type II diabetes, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder and epilepsy. The annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/16/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set assessment for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #58. The findings included:The facility staff had coded Resident #58's annual MDS assessment to indicate the resident had been administered insulin. Resident #58 did not have a provider order for insulin and had not received insulin during the look back period of this MDS assessment.Resident #58's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension.Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #58's annual MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/30/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 points. Per the MDS manual a 9=moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Section N (medications) had been coded to indicate this resident received insulin injections.During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to find a current or discontinued provider order for insulin.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, facility staff failed to complete (PASARR) for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #18. The findings included:Resident #18's diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, dementia, psychosis, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder.Resident #18's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/22/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 00 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment.Resident #18's care plan included a focus that read in part, (resident name omitted) has a history of behaviors which include refusing showers or baths at times, refuses to allow staff to assist her. Physically striking others. Refuses room change; delusions-states we are being watched through the cameras. Refuses to see Dentist, Optometrist.This surveyor was unable to locate a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) in the clinical record.On 1/13/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 57 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for (3) three of (38) thirty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4, Resident #64, and Resident #94. The findings included:1. For resident #4 the facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan upon admission. Resident #4's diagnoses included but were not limited to, a history of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body) as well as dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type II diabetes, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder and epilepsy. The annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/16/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 10 out 15 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #4 was initially admitted to the facility in April of 2024. The baseline care plan was initiated but only question #2 for primary language and question #4 for allergies had been answered. The rest of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered, comprehensive, activity care plan for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #80. The findings included:For Resident #80 the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's mental and psychosocial needs and include the resident's goals, desired outcomes, and preferences for activities. Resident #80's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, volume depletion, atherosclerotic heart disease, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideations, schizoaffective disorder, acute or chronic malnutrition, and personal history of mental and behavioral disorders. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/10/26, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 4 out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team, for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #9. The findings included:For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to reassess the effectiveness of the interventions and review and revise the resident's comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to meet the resident's needs. Resident #9's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebrovascular disease, spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, schizophrenia, depressive disorder, and cognitive communication disorder. The most recent annual minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/20/25, was coded for the resident being rarely/never understood with short and long-term memory problems, and moderate impairment in decision-making. A review of the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living care for (2) two of (28) twenty-eight dependent residents, Resident #10 and Resident #64. The findings included:1.For Resident #10 the facility staff failed to provide showers or daily bed baths. Resident #10's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side and contracture, left hand. Resident #10's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/21/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section GG, functional abilities, coded the resident as needing partial/moderate assistance with showering/bathing. Resident #10's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for Potential for Self Care Deficit r/t (related to): Requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered activity program to support resident choice, interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #80. The findings included:For Resident #80, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered, activity program to support resident choice, interests, and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #80's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, volume depletion, atherosclerotic heart disease, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideations, schizoaffective disorder, acute or chronic malnutrition, and personal history of mental and behavioral disorders. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/10/26, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provided ordered treatment for pressure ulcers for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4. The findings included:Resident #4's diagnoses included but were not limited to, a history of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body) as well as dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type II diabetes, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder and epilepsy. The annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/16/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 10 out 15 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. On 1/3/26 at 11:25 AM a progress note read, Stage 2 pressure injury noted to sacrum. Area was cleansed with normal saline, barrier cream and foam dressing applied. Resident repositioned every 2 hours and prn (as needed). Incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide food that is prepared to conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident # 21. The findings included:For Resident #21 the facility staff failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive.Resident #21's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to dysphagia following cerebral infarction.Resident #21's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/16/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 9 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired.Resident #21's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for Potential for swallowing difficulty as related to: dysphagia. Interventions for this plan include diet as ordered.On 01/13/25 at 1 pm, surveyor spoke with Resident #21's mother. Resident #21's mother was visiting resident at this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow an established infection control program for (3) three of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4, Resident #32, and Resident #73. The findings included: 1. For resident #4, the facility staff failed to ensure the foley catheter drainage bag was not resting on the floor. Resident #4's diagnoses included but were not limited to, a history of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body) as well as dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type II diabetes, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder and epilepsy. The annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/16/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 10 out 15 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. On 1/14/26 at 11:38 AM, this surveyor entered resident #4's room with the infection preventionist (IP) to observe wound care. This surveyor noted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with nationally recognized standards for (1) one of (5) five sampled residents, Resident #14. The findings included:The facility staff failed to offer the resident a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 15 (PCV15), 20 (PCV20), or 21 (PCV21) after their admission to the facility.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website updated 10/07/25 recommends for individuals greater than 50 years or older that have only previously received only PPSV23: 1 dose of PCV15 or 1 dose PCV20 or 1 dose PCV21 at least 1 year after the last PPSV23 dose.Resident #14's age was greater than 50 and their diagnoses included diabetes and dementia.Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #14's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/12/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating this resident was cognitively intact.On 01/13/26 the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensue medications were available for administration for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #1. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication SPS Oral solution (Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate [Kayexalate]) was available for administration. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, SPS Oral suspension 15 GM/60 ML (Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate). Give 60 ml by mouth one time a day for hyperkalemia. Order Date: 01/03/2024. Start Date: 01/04/2024. Discontinue: 01/15/2024, Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate Oral Suspension 15 GM/60 ML (Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate). Give 30 ml by mouth one time only for supplement for 1 day. Order Date: 01/15/2024. Start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 13 resident were free of significant medication errors, Resident #1 and Resident #1 and Resident #10. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to administer the medications insulin glargine, metoprolol, and SPS Oral solution (sodium polystyrene sulfonate) per the physician's orders. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for I am a diabetic and . has the diagnosis of hypertension . Interventions for these care plans included Diabetes medications as ordered by the physician and Medications as ordered by the physician. Resident #1's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary for the month of January 2024 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to notify physician and/or responsible party of a change in condition for 3 of 13 residents, Resident #4, Resident #7, and Resident #2. The findings included: 1. For Resident #4 the facility staff failed to notify the physician and responsible party of a fall. Resident #4's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to COVID-19, weakness, dementia, and difficulty walking. Resident #4's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 09/07/22 coded the resident as having both short and long-term memory loss with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #4's clinical record was reviewed and contained nurse's progress notes which read in part, 09/07/2022 17:34 Note Text: Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall. Obtained a ST (skin tear) to right elbow and it is unclear whether or not he hit his head, there are no discolorations noted at present time. VS (vital signs): 117/86, 93, 18, 97.5 & 93 % on RA (room air). ROM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement facility policy and procedures regarding reporting and investigating a resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2 the facility failed to implement facility policy in regard to reporting and investigating a resident-to-resident altercation occurring on 10/14/23. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but was not limited to Unspecified Dementia/ Unspecified Severity/with other Behavioral Disturbance, AMS (altered mental status), Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Unspecified Mood (Affective) Disorder. On a MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/25/23, R2 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making decisions, having scored zero out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). Resident #2's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of alleged resident-to-resident abuse for 1 of 13 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2, the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation occurring on 10/14/23. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but was not limited to Unspecified Dementia/ Unspecified Severity/with other Behavioral Disturbance, AMS (altered mental status), Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Unspecified Mood (Affective) Disorder. On a MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/25/23, R2 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making decisions, having scored zero out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). A review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed a general progress note dated, 10/14/2023 14:15 (2:15 PM) General Note, Called to room via call bell. As this writer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an incident of alleged resident-to-resident abuse for 1 of 13 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2 the facility failed to investigate an incident of alleged resident-to-resident abuse during a resident-to-resident altercation on 10/14/23. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but was not limited to Unspecified Dementia/ Unspecified Severity/with other Behavioral Disturbance, AMS (altered mental status), Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Unspecified Mood (Affective) Disorder. On a MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/25/23, R2 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making decisions, having scored zero out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). Resident #2's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for, I sometimes have behaviors which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for the administration of medications for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #1. The findings included: Resident #1's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to other cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and personal history of urinary tract infection. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, SPS Oral suspension 15 GM/60 ML (Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate). Give 60 ml by mouth one time a day for hyperkalemia. Order Date: 01/03/2024. Start Date: 01/04/2024. Discontinue: 01/15/2024, Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate Oral Suspension 15 GM/60 ML (Sodium Polystyrene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow medical provider orders for 1 of 13 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9. The findings included: For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to obtain blood sugar readings as ordered by the provider. Resident #9's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Bipolar Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/17/24 coded the resident as being independent in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #9's current physician orders included orders dated 1/23/24 to obtain fasting blood sugar in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and obtain blood sugar at 4:00 PM every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Surveyor reviewed Resident #9's clinical record and was unable to locate blood sugar results as ordered. The most recent blood sugar documented on the resident's Blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5% or less during medication pass and pour observation on 6/13/2022. During medication pass and pour observation on 6/13/2022, the surveyor observed 25 opportunities for error. The surveyor observed 3 medication errors affecting 2 residents. The calculated error rate was 12% (3/25=.12 X 100%= 12%). Error observation detail: 1- For Resident #47, the antidepressant medication Wellbutrin was unavailable and the ordered dose of Adderall was not available. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sequelae of cerebral infarction, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, dementia, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction on right dominant side, and iron deficiency anemia. On the minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 5/2/2022, the resident scored 10/15 on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure food was stored under safe and sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 dry storage rooms and 2 of 3 nursing unit pantries, North Unit and South Unit. In the dry storage room, two (2) cans of tomato soup and three (3) cans of evaporated milk had exceed the best by dates. The [NAME] Unit pantry refrigerator contained an unlabeled container of cut watermelon, two (2) unlabeled fast food sub sandwiches, and an open, unlabeled package of precooked bacon. The South Unit pantry contained an open, unrefrigerated container of grated parmesan cheese. The findings included: On 6/12/22 at 2:00 pm, in the emergency food section of the dry storage room, surveyor observed a 51 ounce can of tomato soup with a printed best by date of 1/15/22 and a 51 ounce can of tomato soup with a printed best by date of 3/13/21. The dietary account manager was present and also observed the best by date printed on each can of tomato soup. On the other side of the dry storage room, surveyor observed three (3) 12 ounce cans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete an admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 23 Residents, Resident #91. The facility staff failed to code the MDS to indicate Resident #91 was receiving dialysis. The findings included: Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #91's admission MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/31/22 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. Section O (special treatments/procedures/programs) had been coded to indicate the resident was not receiving dialysis. Resident #91's clinical record included the diagnoses end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and acquired absence of kidney. Resident #91's physician orders included dialysis three times a week. The order date was documented as 05/30/22. Resident #91's comprehensive care plan included the focus area alteration in kidney function due to end stage renal disease evidenced by hemodialysis. During initial tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for 1 of 3 closed resident record reviews, Resident #97. The facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary when Resident #97 was discharged home. The findings included: This was a closed record review. Resident #97's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, and Cerebrovascular Disease. The admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/17/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating Resident #97 was cognitively intact. The resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and being independent in eating. A discharge return not anticipated MDS with an ARD of 4/06/22 coded the resident as being discharged to the community on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document reviews, facility staff failed to ensure ordered medications were administered for 2 of 23 sampled current residents (#47, #70). 1- For Resident #47, the antidepressant medication Wellbutrin was unavailable and the ordered dose of Adderall was not available. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sequelae of cerebral infarction, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, dementia, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction on right dominant side, and iron deficiency anemia. On the minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 5/2/2022, the resident scored 10/15 on the brief interview for mental status (indicating some cognitive impairment) and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. On 6/13/2022 at 10:21 AM during medication pass and pour observation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 2 of 26 sampled residents, Resident #96 and Resident 47. Resident #96's eye drops, Amiodarone, and Spironolactone were not available for administration. Resident #47's Wellbutrin was not available for administration. The findings included: 1. This was a closed record review. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #96's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/11/22 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating Resident #96 was alert and orientated. Resident #96's clinical record included the diagnoses, congestive heart failure, diabetes, urinary retention, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. Resident #96's clinical record included the following orders. Ketorolac Tromethamine solution 1 drop in left eye two times a day order date 01/07/22. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider ordered laboratory test was completed for 1 of 23 sampled current residents, Resident #44. For Resident #44, the facility staff failed to obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) laboratory test. A potassium level is part of a BMP. The findings include: Resident #44's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/5/22, was dated as completed on 5/6/22. Resident #44 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #44's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a zero (0) out of 15; this indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #44 was documented as requiring assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #44's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: anemia, heart disease, high blood pressure, and malnutrition. Resident #44's care plan included a current 'focus' for Risk for Cardiac Distress .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-10-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide a quality assurance program to meet the needs of the facility. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure an effective QA (quality assurance) program to meet the needs of the facility as evidenced by repeated deficiencies from the previous 6/4/18 survey in the areas of reasonable accommodations of needs/preferences, self determinstion, confidentiality of records, develop and implement comprehensive care plan, care plan timing and revision, services provided to meet professional standards, quality of care, dialysis, drug regimen review, resident records, free of accidendent hazzards/surpervision and infection control.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-18 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the receiving provider all of the required documentation including a comprehensive care plan when a resident was transferred to the hospital for 4 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68, #39, #96 and #63). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide the receiving provider/facility of the required documentation including the comprehensive care plan when Resident #68 was sent to the ER (emergency room) on 10/6/19. Resident #68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/6/19 The resident had the following diagnoses of, but not limited to anemia, heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, dementia and depression. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/23/19, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #68 was also coded as requiring supervision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the resident or resident representative of the bed hold policy when 4 of 30 residents in the survey sample were discharged to the hospital (Resident #68, #39, #96 and #63). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to offer Resident #68 and the resident representative of the bed hold policy when the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/6/19. The resident had the following diagnoses of, but not limited to anemia, heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, dementia and depression. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/23/19, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #68 was also coded as requiring supervision of 1 staff member for dressing, personal hygiene and limited assistance of 1 staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 6 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #29, #39, #58, #78, #63 and #94). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for Resident #29. Resident #29 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of, but not limited to high blood pressure, anxiety disorder, manic depression and psychotic disorder. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of [DATE], the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #29 was also coded as requiring supervision of 1 staff member for dressing and personal hygiene and requiring physical help in part of the bathing activity from 1 staff member. During the clinical record review from [DATE] through [DATE], the surveyor noted the following documentation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide one of 30 Residents in the survey sample with reasonable accommodation of needs, Resident # 63. The findings included The facility staff failed to ensure that the call bell was within reach for Resident # 63. Resident # 63 was a [AGE] year-old-female that was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 7/2/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, pain in bilateral hands, muscle weakness, vertigo, and paraplegia. The clinical record for Resident # 63 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 9:46 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 63 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/21/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 63 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that Resident #63 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, Resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47. The findings included The facility staff failed to allow Resident # 47 to eat meals in her preferred location, the facility dining room. Resident # 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, traumatic brain injury and major depressive disorder. The clinical record for Resident # 47 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 12:15 pm. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 47 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/5/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 47 had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that Resident # 15 was cognitively intact. The current plan of care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of changes for two of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #63 and Resident # 110. The findings included 1. The facility staff failed to notify the physician that Resident # 63 had vaginal bleeding for more than a month. Resident # 63 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 7/2/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anemia, abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding, paraplegia, and muscle weakness. The clinical record for Resident # 63 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 9:46 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 63 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/21/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 63 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's property from loss or theft resulting in unavailability of pain medication and failing to maintain a clean air conditioning unit in the resident's room for 2 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Residents #103 and #112). 1. For Resident #103, facility staff failed to secure from loss or theft Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant carcinoid tumor of the rectum, major depression, low back pain, diabetes mellitus type 2 with ophthalmic complications, chronic pain, difficulty in walking, traumatic amputation of right lower leg, hypertension, anxiety, nicotine dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bipolar disorder. On the 14 day Minimum Data Set assessment with assessment reference date 9/23/19, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review, and during the course of a complaint investigation it was determined that the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse for two of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 314 and Resident # 97. The findings included 1. The facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse for Resident # 314. Upon being informed of the allegation of abuse made by Resident # 314, the facility staff failed to report the allegation to the appropriate agencies within a timely manner. Resident # 314 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, chronic pain, and hypertension. The clinical record for Resident # 314 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 9:54 am. The surveyor observed a nurse's note that had been documented on 3/30/18 at 6:27 pm. The nurse's not was documented as, Resident alert with confusion noted, daughter reported to nurse that resident stated that he was beat up by two CNAs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to investigate abuse allegations for one of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 314. The findings included The facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of abuse that had been reported for Resident # 314. Resident # 314 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, chronic pain, and hypertension. The clinical record for Resident # 314 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 9:54 am. The surveyor observed a nurse's note that had been documented on 3/30/18 at 6:27 pm. The nurse's not was documented as, Resident alert with confusion noted, daughter reported to nurse that resident stated that he was beat up by two CNAs (certified nursing assistants) that took their clothes off while changing his clothes, all this was done on the floor, daughter stated that she wants staff to be more tactful when caring for her dad, reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman and/or resident upon discharge for 3 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68, #39, and #63). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman of the discharge of Resident #68 when the resident was sent to the ER (emergency room) on 10/6/19. Resident #68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/6/19 The resident had the following diagnoses of, but not limited to anemia, heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, dementia and depression. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/23/19, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #68 was also coded as requiring supervision of 1 staff member for dressing, personal hygiene and limited assistance of 1 staff member for bathing. During the clinical record review on 10/15/19 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, the facility staff failed to periodically conduct a standardized reproducible assessment by completing an annual assessment for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 8). Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, contracture of left wrist and hand, anemia, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following infarct, acquired absence or leg, essential hypertension, atherosclerosis with ulceration of left heel, symbolic dysfunctions, paraplegia, and other sequelae of cerebrovascular disease. On the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date 6/10/19, the resident scored 10/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. Clinical record review on 10/10/19 at 9:07 AM revealed the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment due 9/10/19 had not been completed by 10/10/19. The surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that two of 30 residents in the survey sample received the necessary services as outline in the Level II PASARR, Resident #9 and Resident #74. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 9 had restorative nursing and outpatient psychiatric services as recommended in her Level II PASARR (preadmission screening and record review). Resident # 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 9/10/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The clinical record for Resident # 9 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 11:10 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/17/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 9 had a BIMS score (brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan for 2 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68 and #39). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to complete the base line care plan when Resident #68 was readmitted to the nursing facility on 9/14/19. Resident #68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after being discharged to the hospital on 9/11/19 for the resident coughing up blood. The resident had the following diagnoses of, but not limited to coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, stroke and depression. On the significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/31/19; the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #68 was also coded as being totally dependent on 1 staff member for dressing, personal hygiene and bathing. During the clinical record review on 10/15/19 through 10/18/19, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 30 Residents in the survey sample resulting in failure to provide specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services the nursing facility would provide as a result of PASARR recommendations (Resident #74) and to attain highest practicable well-being related to hospice care (Resident #108)and behavioral health (Resident #73). 1. For Resident #74, facility staff failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into the resident's comprehensive care plan. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included catatonic schizophrenia, functional quadriplegia, epilepsy, gastrostomy, chronic pain, muscle weakness, dysphagia, convulsions, lack of falls, ischemia, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and hypertension. On the Minimum Data Set assessment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47 and Resident # 96. The findings included 1. The facility staff failed to document the administration of Clonazepam on the medication administration record for Resident # 47. Resident # 47 was a [AGE] year-old-female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anxiety, major depressive disorder, traumatic brain injury, and hypertension. The clinical record for Resident # 47 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 2:27 pm. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 47 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/5/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 47 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) of 15 out of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care of one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 88. The findings included The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 88's hair was washed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and schizophrenia. The clinical record for Resident # 88 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 11:28 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 88 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/10/19. Section B of the MDS assesses hearing speech and vision. In Section B0700, the facility staff documented that Resident # 88 was rarely or never understood. Section G of the MDS assesses functional status. In Section G0120, the facility staff documented that Resident # 88 was totally dependent with one person providing physical assistance for bathing. The current plan of care for Resident # 88 was reviewed and revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to pain management was provided to residents who require such services resulting in unavailability of the pain medication oxycodone for administration according to physician orders for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #103). The findings included: Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant carcinoid tumor of the rectum, major depression, low back pain, diabetes mellitus type 2 with ophthalmic complications, chronic pain, difficulty in walking, traumatic amputation of right lower leg, hypertension, anxiety, nicotine dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bipolar disorder. On the 14 day Minimum Data Set assessment with assessment reference date 9/23/19, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate and complete communication between the nursing facility and the dialysis facility for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68). The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure adequate and complete communication between the nursing facility and the dialysis facility for Resident #68. Resident #68 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/6/19 The resident had the following diagnoses of, but not limited to anemia, heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, dementia and depression. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/23/19, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #68 was also coded as requiring supervision of 1 staff member for dressing, personal hygiene and limited assistance of 1 staff member for bathing. During the clinical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to assure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety for two of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9 and Resident # 63. The findings included: The facility staff failed to produce documentation that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies related to safety with the Hoyer lift following falls from the Hoyer lift for Resident # 9 and Resident # 63. Resident # 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 9 had a facility readmission date of 9/10/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The clinical record for Resident # 9 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 11:10 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/17/19. Section C of the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure that three of 30 residents in the survey sample received behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being, Resident # 9, Resident # 17, and Resident # 63. The findings included 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 9 had a follow up visit with behavioral health services in a timely manner. Resident # 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 9/10/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The clinical record for Resident # 9 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 12:00 pm. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 9 was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/17/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to ensure that the plan of care for Resident # 11 included resident centered dementia care to ensure the highest practicable well-being. Resident # 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 11/29/17. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, psychosis, and delusional disorders. The clinical record for Resident # 11 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 11:57 am. The most recent MDS assessment for Resident # 11 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD of 8/26/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 11 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) of 15 out of 15, which indicated that Resident # 11 was cognitively intact. The most recent annual MDS assessment for Resident # 11 had an ARD of 3/20/19. According to the care area assessments in Section V0200, the facility staff documented that cognitive loss and dementia would be addressed in the plan of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that medications were available for one of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47. The findings included The facility staff failed to ensure that clonazepam was available for administration for Resident # 47. Resident # 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anxiety, major depressive disorder, traumatic brain injury, and hypertension. The clinical record for Resident # 47 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 2:27 pm. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 47 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/5/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 47 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) of 15 out of 15, which indicated that Resident # 47 was cognitively intact. Resident # 47 had orders that included but was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that a pharmacy recommendation was acted upon in a timely manner for one of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 88. The findings included The facility staff failed to act upon a pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner for Resident # 88. Resident # 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and schizophrenia. The clinical record for Resident # 88 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 11:28 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 88 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/10/19. Section B of the MDS assesses hearing speech and vision. In Section B0700, the facility staff documented that Resident # 88 was rarely or never understood. On 10/10/19 at 11:23 am, the surveyor observed pharmacy recommendation in the clinical record For Resident # 17 dated 9/25/19. The pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that psychotropic medications necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record followed physician orders in regards to administering antipsychotic and psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #113) and failed to monitor side effects of medications for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #106 and #110). The findings included: 1. For Resident #113, when the resident was re-admitted to the facility the nursing staff failed to enter the residents new orders into the computer system resulting in the resident receiving fluphenazine (anti-psychotic) and trazodone (anti-depressant) without a physicians order and being administered clonazepam at 5:00 and 9:00 p.m. when the order read every 6 hours. The resident had no adverse reactions to the medications. The clinical record was reviewed on 01/02-01/03/2020. The Residents face sheet included the diagnoses schizoaffective disorder depressive type, generalized anxiety, major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to obtain labs as ordered for 2 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #23 and #77). The findings included: 1. For resident #23 the facility staff failed to obtain a Valproic Acid Level as ordered for 8/15/18. Resident #23's face sheet listed an admission date of 1/23/15. The resident's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Bipolar Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Parkinson's Disease, Type 1 Diabetes, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD of 7/16/19 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. Resident #23 was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing, personal hygiene and total dependence for bathing. Resident #23's medical record contained a physician's order dated 5/15/18 for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain dental services to meet resident needs for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 17. The findings included The facility staff failed to set up a dental appointment for Resident # 17 after she voiced that her dentures were ill fitting. Resident # 17 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 12/4/10. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, dysphagia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hypokalemia. The clinical record for Resident # 17 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 11:49 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 17 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/28/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 17 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) of 13 out of 15, which indicated that Resident # 17 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 63. The findings included The facility staff failed to provide Resident # 63 with Prafos (pressure relief ankle foot orthosis) to avoid ankle contracture. Resident # 63 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 7/2/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anemia, Guillian Barre syndrome, paraplegia, and muscle weakness. The clinical record for Resident # 63 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 9:46 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 63 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/21/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 63 had a BIMS (brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0826 — isolatedProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to have a written order of a physician to provide Physical Therapy services for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #97). Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, contractures of hips and knees, repeated falls, attention and concentration deficits and spatial neglect following subarachnoid hemorrhage dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depression, and psychosis. On the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with assessment reference date 8/21/19, the resident was assessed with short and long term memory deficits and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The resident was assessed as requiring extensive assistance of 2 or more persons for transfer, supervision for locomotion on the nursing unit in a wheelchair, and extensive assistance of one person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for two of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 63 and Resident # 77. The findings included 1. The facility staff failed to document an open area to Resident # 63's right inner thigh on weekly skin sheets. Resident # 63 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 7/2/19. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, anemia, abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding, paraplegia, and muscle weakness. The clinical record for Resident # 63 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 9:46 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 63 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/21/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 63 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that Resident #63 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control guidelines on one of three facility units. The findings included The facility staff failed to follow the infection control policy for handwashing. On 10/8/19 at 12:55pm, during initial tour the surveyor observed contact precaution signage on Resident # 88's door. The surveyor observed that CNA # 3 (certified nursing assistant) was in Resident # 88's room, with isolation gown and gloves on, as she provided feeding assistance to Resident # 88. On 10/8/19 at 1:05 pm, the surveyor observed CNA # 3 as she exited Resident # 88's room with Resident # 88's meal tray. The surveyor observed CNA # 3 as she carried the tray with her bare hands and placed the tray on the food cart. The surveyor observed that CNA # 3 did not wash or sanitize her hands. CNA # 3 entered room another Resident's room, handled items on her over bed table, and removed her meal tray from her room and placed it on the food cart. The surveyor asked CNA # 3 how facility staff was expected to handle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a pest free environment in the dining room as evidenced by two surveyors walked into dining room and observed a roach crawling across the floor. The findings included: On 1/3/2020 at approximately 12:15 pm, 2 surveyors walked into the dining room to speak to 3 un sampled residents. While the surveyors were walking in, 1 surveyor looked down and a brown colored roach was noted to be running from out of the bottom of the wall and going toward the center of the dining room. The three unsampled residents stated to the two surveyors, We are so glad that you got that roach. He comes out every day and tries to have lunch with us. The surveyors asked if they have only observed one roach in the dining room. The three residents stated, No there are usually three of them. The maintenance director was notified of the above documented findings at 12:25 pm by the 2 surveyors. The maintenance director stated, I didn't know the residents had been seeing them in here (referring to dining room). At 2 pm, the maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-06-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the completion and posting of the facility's daily 'nurse staffing information.' The findings include: On the afternoon of 6/12/22, the facility staff's posting of 'nurse staffing information, was observed to be posted in the front lobby of the facility. The posted 'nurse staffing information' was dated 6/9/22. The failure of the facility staff to post the facility's 'nurse staffing information' since 6/9/22 was discussed with the facility's Regional Vice-President on 6/12/22 at 3:24 p.m. On the afternoon of 6/12/22, the Regional Vice-President reviewed the posted 'nurse staffing information', it was noted the only posted 'nurse staffing information' was dated 6/9/12. The device holding the posted 'nursing staff information' form did not include 'nurse staff information' for any other dates. On 6/15/22 at 11:40 a.m., the facility's Administrator was interviewed about aforementioned 6/12/22 observation of the facility's 'nurse staffing information' not being posted since 6/9/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TRIO HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL VIRGINIA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/16/2016 |
| TRIO HEALTH CARE - EAST, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/24/2019 |
| TRIO HEALTHCARE INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/16/2016 |
| TRIO HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/10/2019 |
| GENTRY, BOYD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/16/2016 |
| RUBENSTEIN, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/16/2016 |
| DAVIS, DUANE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/29/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $508K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495143. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.