Bayside Of Poquoson Health And Rehab
1 Vantage Drive, Poquoson, VA 23662 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (757) 868-9960 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2021
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 25.5% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.5% | 15.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.0% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.4% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.7% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.1% | 73.6% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.0%CMS range 28.2–54.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
70 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2021-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 3 residents (Resident #43, #17, #7) of 34 residents in the survey sample, received care to prevent pressure ulcers from developing prior to an advanced stage which constitutes harm; facility staff failed to do initial and weekly assessments for 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19 and facility staff failed to provide pressure ulcer care as ordered by the physician for 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #346. The findings included: 1. For Resident #43, the facility staff failed to prevent pressure ulcer on the sacrum from developing to an advanced stage which constitutes harm. Resident #43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #43 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Unspecified Fracture of Left Femur and Depression. Resident #43's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure resident equipment was kept clean for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #7), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility 09/17/2021 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included advanced dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/10/25 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. The resident's person centered care plan with a revision date of 10/25/24 had a problem which stated I am at risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, poor safety awareness, and psychotropic medication use. The goal stated I will not fall and injure myself through next care plan review. The interventions included two mats left and right side of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to develop person-centerd care plan for a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #8), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #8 was originally admitted to the facility 03/03/2023 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included vascular dementia and chronic gastric outlet obstruction status post PEG tube placement. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/01/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 3 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #8's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 3/25/25 at approximately 12:43 PM during the initial tour an interview was conducted with Resident #8's daughter who was visiting. The daughter lifted the resident's top which revealed a PEG tube. The PEG's external bumper was observed to be position too far from the abdominal skin and the insertion site…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide hygiene care for dependent residents for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #2 and #6), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to remove unwanted hair from the neck and chin of Resident #2. Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility 12/11/24 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, essential hypertension, and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/18/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #2's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 3/25/25 at 12:45 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #2. It was observed that Resident # 2's was rubbing her fingers through a large amount of hair on her neck and chin. Resident #2 stated, I wish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide required care to prevent complications while utilizing an indwelling catheter for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #4), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #4 was originally admitted to the facility 03/01/24 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included neurogenic uropathy with urinary retention. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/09/25 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. At section H0100 A - the resident was coded for requiring use of an indwelling catheter. A physician order dated 3/6/24 stated Foley Catheter 16 french with a 5 milliliter balloon every shift related to urinary retention. The person centered care plan dated 9/13/24 had a problem which stated I have a Foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to necessary respiratory care and services for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #6), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #6 was originally admitted to the facility 1/9/25 after an acute care hospital stay. The resident's current diagnoses included a stroke resulting in left hemiplegia, spatial neglect of left side, left visual deficit and obstructive sleep apnea. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/15/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 11 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #6's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The physician's order summary had an order dated 1/20/25 for a C-PAP at previous home settings at bedtime for acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and as needed. The person centered care plan with a problem dated 1/29/25 which stated alteration in respiratory status due to sleep apnea. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview the facility staff failed to secure resident medications on 3/27/25. The findings included: On 3/27/25 at approximately 10:47 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was observed passing medications on the 200's hall. LPN #2 went from room to room for seven rooms pulling and administering the medications. In between pulling the medication and administering it to the residents the medication cart was left unlocked making the medications accessible to unauthorized individuals. At 11:06 AM the Administrator was observed coming onto the 200's hall with a visiting male and female to visit a resident. The Administrator observed the unattended, unlocked medication cart in the hallway and went over to it and closed the locking mechanisms without saying anything to LPN #2, who was inside a resident's room. When LPN #2 returned to the medication cart, he pulled at a medication drawer but it did not open, he looked around but said nothing. LPN #2 was observed removing the medication cart key from his pocket, unlocked the medication cart and resumed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to assess and monitor a surgical wound on a resident's right breast after a breast biopsy was completed; which contributed to the resident becoming septic and hospitalized for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/11/24. The resident did not return to the nursing facility. The current diagnoses included major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/21/24, coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of 15. The care plan dated 4/27/24 read Resident #1 had open areas related to dermatitis of the right buttock and perineum. The goal for Resident #1 is open areas will be free of infection and healing state through the next care plan review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to properly care for a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #8), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #8 was originally admitted to the facility 03/03/2023 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included vascular dementia and chronic gastric outlet obstruction status post PEG tube placement. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/01/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 3 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #8's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 3/25/25 at approximately 12:43 PM during the initial tour an interview was conducted with Resident #8's daughter who was visiting. The daughter lifted the resident's top which revealed a PEG tube. The PEG's external bumper was observed to be position too far from the abdominal skin and the insertion site had leakage and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a complete record for 1 of 12 residents in the survey sample; Resident #1 The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/11/24. The current diagnoses included major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/21/24, coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of 15. The care plan dated 4/27/24 read Resident #1 had open areas related to dermatitis of the right buttock and perineum. The goal for Resident #1 is for open areas to be free of infection and in a healing state through the following care plan review on 05/01/2024. The interventions for Resident #1 were: Encourage proper nutrition. If a resident refuses a meal, offer an alternative and provide medication/treatment as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation staff interviews and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to establish/provide collaborative care (Hospice) for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #7, 8, and 12), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility 09/17/2021 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included advanced dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/10/25 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired daily decision making abilities. A physician order dated 2/12/24 stated (name of the hospice agency) to evaluate and treat. A hospice agency document dated 2/14/24 stated the resident elected hospices services 2/14/24. A review of the resident's clinical record failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure that twelve hours of in-service education/training within twelve months was completed by five of five sampled Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) #7, 6, 3, 8 and 9. The findings included: A review of the five CNA training transcripts and education records revealed that they had not completed the mandatory 12- hours of in-service education/training including dementia management and resident abuse prevention training. An interview was conducted with CNA #7 on 8/28/24 at 10:05 AM. CNA #7 stated she did not recall if she had completed twelve hours of in-service training to include working with residents with dementia and resident abuse prevention training. An interview was also conducted with CNA #3 on 8/28/24 at 10:17 AM. CNA #3 stated she could not remember if she had received twelve hours of training within the last year. On 8/28/24 at 11:24 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding CNAs mandatory training. The DON stated that training and education were areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and sanitary food preparation area in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included; On 8-26-24 at approximately 6:40 PM, the kitchen area of the facility was inspected with the dining services manager. A metal drawer was observed under a long counter where food prep was conducted on the back wall of the kitchen. The drawer did not close under the counter, and was rusty, off of the track, and littered with food debris which could not be removed by simply wiping, as the debris was adhered with a sticky greasy substance. The inspection observations continued in the walk in freezer, dry storage room, and refrigerator. The dry storage food room contained canned goods, pasta, boxed goods, bagged cereals, and pantry storage of shelf stable items. Three large rolling bins of flour, sugar, and rice were observed open, which were dirty with a dried film on them and presumably a white food debris substance in the crevices of the sliding tops. The floor had food debris…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to implement an effective pest control program affecting dining services and as a result the facility as a whole. The findings included: For the Residents of the facility the facility staff failed to ensure the facility was free of pests to include mice. On 8-26-24 at approximately 6:40 PM, the kitchen area of the facility was inspected with the dining services manager. The inspection observations continued in the dry storage room of the kitchen which contained canned goods, pasta, boxed goods, bagged cereals, and general pantry storage of shelf stable items. Three large rolling bins of flour, sugar, and rice were observed open, which were dirty with a dried film on them and presumably a white food debris substance in the crevices of the sliding tops. The floor had food debris and a black sticky substances around the base boards and in the corners of the room. Mouse droppings (excrement) were on the floor of the room close to a mouse trap with a dead mouse in it. Behind the main door into the room was a Sticky trap which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's right to a dignified existence and self-determination for 1 Resident (#21) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #21, the facility staff failed to appropriately dress the resident, supply a top sheet and blanket and respond to his request to wear something other than an incontinent brief. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dysphagia after stroke, Diabetes Type II, dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness (generalized) hemiplegia and hemiparesis following stroke affecting the right dominant side, contracture of the right hand and contracture of the right elbow. Resident #21's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/7/24, coded Resident #21 as having a BIMS (Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure the survey results book was readily accessible during the initial entrance of the facility. The findings included: On 8/26/24 at approximately 7:05 PM., during the facility entrance of the main lobby a sign was noticed on a table in the main lobby that read Survey Book is kept in the main lobby. No Survey Book was observed. 08/26/24 at approximately, 7:09 PM., an interview was conducted with the administrator concerning the survey book whereabout. The administrator pulled the survey book from a table in his office, saying that he had the survey book since Friday (8/23/24) because he was expecting us to come in at any time to survey the facility. The above findings were shared with the Administrator, The Director of Nursing (DON) and corporate staff on 8/28/24 at approximately 1:30 PM., during the final interview.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, comfortable, home-like environment for 3 of the 14 Resident rooms in Hall 100. The findings included: For the Residents who resided in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], the facility staff failed to make repairs to the walls by the head of the bed, where there were gouges in the drywall from the bed impacting the wall. For the Residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], the facility staff failed to provide linens that were in good repair and without holes or stains. On 8/26/24 at approximately 6:45 p.m. during the initial tour of the facility, the following observations were made: room [ROOM NUMBER] A & B - Deep gouges in the drywall by the head of the bed were observed and had not been repaired. room [ROOM NUMBER] A Bed - Resident asleep and the blanket was noted to have brownish colored stain at foot of bed room [ROOM NUMBER] A Bed - Small hole in bottom sheet and no top sheet on bed. room [ROOM NUMBER] A Bed - Large gouges in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for 2 Residents (Residents #2, and #21) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2, the the facility staff failed to document resident specific measurable goals, and failed to derive and implement a behavioral modification care plan for a Resident with documented brain injury and behaviors. Resident #2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; hypertension, seizure disorder, dementia, depression, pulmonary embolus, and traumatic brain injury with behaviors, stroke and convulsions/movement disorders/muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 7-17-24. He was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicting no cognitive impairment. He required assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, The facility staff failed to follow a physician's order to ensure two resident received physician ordered medications for two (2) of 35 residents (Resident #38, #21), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Essential (Primary) Hypertension. The quarterly revised Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/13/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #38 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities and Goals) the resident was coded as being independent with eating, dependent with personal hygiene, showers/bathing, dressing, and toileting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 Resident in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #21 the facility staff failed to provide 2 showers per week for Resident who is unable to provide self-care. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dysphagia after stroke, Diabetes Type II, dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness (generalized) hemiplegia and hemiparesis following stroke affecting the right dominant side, contracture of the right hand and contracture of the right elbow. Resident #21's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/7/24, coded Resident #21 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15/15, indicating no cognitive impairment. On the morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed for two residents (Residents #2, and #49) to ensure pharmacy recommendations were obtained and acted upon, in the survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2, the pharmacist recommendations were not obtained, nor acted upon, and not in the clinical record, in the preceding 8 months of 2024. Resident #2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; hypertension, seizure disorder, dementia, depression, pulmonary embolus, and traumatic brain injury with behaviors, stroke and convulsions/movement disorders/muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 7-17-24. He was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicting no cognitive impairment. He required assistance with activities of daily living care. He was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure they were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 Resident (#49) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 49, the facility staff failed to ensure that the PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety drug Lorazepam was no more than 14 days duration without proper documentation. Resident # was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance and anxiety, acute kidney failure, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia with severe agitation, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, prediabetes and history of falls. On 8/26/24, a review of the clinical record revealed that on 5/3/24, Resident # 49 received an order for Lorazepam (Ativan) 0.5 mg PO tabs, to be taken one tablet every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. There was no stop date for this order. A review of the MAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on inspection of medications on one medication cart and the facility's Stat box, facility staff failed to ensure medications for resident administraton were not expired. The findings included: 1. A medication cart audit was conducted on 8/29/24 at approximately 11:57 AM., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5. Stored inside the medication cart was 1 opened Humalog insulin pen with no open date, 1 opened Lantus insulin pen with no open date and 1 opened vial of mixed Humalog insulin with no resident name/identification. LPN #5 said that the dates should be written on the insulin pens because they expire in 28 days and that a name should be written on the vial. The above findings were shared during the Pre-exit with the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON) and corporate staff on 8/29/24 at approximately 1:30 PM. The DON said that drugs and biologicals should be labeled with a date and resident name. 2. For the facility, the facility staff failed to ensure that all medications available for use in the Stat box were not expired. On 8/27/24, a review of the stat box…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility failed to ensure that 5 of 34 residents in the survey sample were afforded the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive upon admission, Residents' #5, #9, #19, #346, and #15. The findings included: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/10/21. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #5 was coded as a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #5's electronic medical record was reviewed and there was no advance directive document located. Resident #5's current comprehensive care plan was review and is documented in part, as follows: Focus: Name (Resident #5) has an advance Directive as evidenced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Medicare Beneficiary Notices in accordance with applicable Federal regulations, were issued to 3 of 34 residents (Resident #348, Resident #5 and Resident #9) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to issue a NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage), letter to Resident #348 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining. Resident #348 was admitted to the nursing facility on 01/25/21. Diagnosis for Resident #348 included but not limited to Muscle weakness. Resident #348's Minimum Data Set (MDS) an OBRA admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 02/01/21 coded Resident #348 a 14 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated the resident with no cognitive impairment. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review provided by the facility to surveyor, was noted that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on general observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained clean comfortable and homelike for 3 resident rooms on the quarantine unit, room [ROOM NUMBER] (A&B), #204 (B) and #207 (A). The findings included: On 5/4/21 at 11:00 a.m., during the orientation tour, through 5/6/21 at 2:00 p.m., the biohazard receptacles were the over flowing trash and soiled linen in the resident's bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 207 as well as trash and other debris on the floors. Blood stains, trash, feces and other debris were identified on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #147 who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER], unlike the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 207 was able to express his discontent with the condition of his room. This resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic diabetic wounds of right and left foot with status post bilateral transmetatarsal amputations and skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure 4 of 34 residents (#152, #151, #30, #43) were free of the misappropriation of their narcotic medications, and ensure their standards and practices prevented reoccurrence. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #152 was free of the misappropriation of her narcotic medication, *Oxycodone (Percocet). Resident #152 was admitted to the nursing facility on [DATE] for short-term rehabilitation. She had diagnoses that included UT not limited to intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy in the lumbar region. The resident was discharged on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 10 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in the skills needed for daily decision making.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the baseline care plan summary was completed for 3 out of 34 residents (Resident #346, Resident #347 and Resident #147) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to complete a newly admitted resident, (Resident #346), a baseline care plan summary. The summary must include the initial goals for the resident, a list of current medications, dietary instructions, services and treatments to be administered by the facility. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. Review of Resident #346's admission assessment dated [DATE] documented the residents was independent in decisions regarding task of daily life, indicating no cognitive impairment. The review of Resident #346's admission Order for May 2021, included but not limited to the following medications, dietary instructions and treatment: Medications include but not limited to: -Oxycodone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing for 2 of 34 residents (Resident #346 and Resident #22) in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to follow a physician's orders for wound vac treatment of an abdominal surgical incision for Resident #346. Resident #346 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #346 included but not limited to surgical aftercare of an Exploratory Laparotomy. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. Review of Resident #346's admission assessment dated [DATE] documented the residents was independent in decisions regarding task of daily life, indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the admission Assessment was coded for having an abdominal surgical wound requiring surgical wound care (wound vac.) The admission Assessment under skin was coded for having an abdominal surgical wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The findings included: A review of the facility as-worked staffing documentation during a 30-day lookback revealed that there were no RN coverage within a 24-hour period on the following days in April 2021: 04/11/21, 04/24/21 and 04/25/21. On 05/10/21 at approximately 4:10 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON.) When asked about the facility not having 8 hours of RN coverage on 04/11/21, 04/24/21 and 04/25/21, they replied, We are not able to provide evidence that there was RN coverage on the days mentioned. A pre-exit conference was conducted with the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and Cooperate Nurse on 05/10/21 at approximately 6:30 p.m. No further information was provided prior to exit.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to assure the 5 agencies were sufficiently oriented to the facility's operational systems necessary to provide care and services. The findings include: The following examples demonstrated the agency staff's expression of the lack of orientation to the facility which directly affected the care and services rendered to the residents: 1. On 5/4/21 at 11:00 a.m., during the orientation tour, through 5/6/21 at 2:00 p.m., the biohazard receptacles were overflowing with trash and soiled linen in the resident's bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 207 on the quarantine unit. These rooms also had a foul odor upon entry. On 5/4/21 at 1:05 p.m., a foul order was apparent upon entering Resident #147's room, who resided on the quarantine unit, and it was discovered the biohazard (red bags) trash and linen receptacles in the bathroom were full, overflowing and soiled items of trash and linen piled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure the system and disposition of all controlled drugs was in place and implemented to enable accurate reconciliation for 1 out of 34 residents (#146), as well as during the facility's physical inventory of their stored controlled medications at each shift change AND The facility staff failed to provide routine pharmacy services for Resident #20. The findings included: 1. Resident #146 was admitted on [DATE] to receive respite/palliative care. He was discharged home on 5/5/21. There was no completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment due to the resident's short-stay. The History and Physical (H&P) dated 5/3/21 indicated that the resident was in the facility under the care of hospice for respite. He was alert and responsive. No Intravenous fluids to be given or laboratory specimens obtained. Resident #146 was ordered Morphine Sulfate 20 mg/ml, give 0.5 ml by mouth every 4 hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 34 residents (Resident #347 and Resident #147) in the survey sample were free of significant medication errors. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to follow physician orders to decrease Aspirin 325 mg to 81 mg. Resident #347's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) a 5-day assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/05/21 coded the resident with a 00 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #347 total dependent of two with bathing, personal hygiene and toilet use, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, transfer and dressing and supervisor with one assist with eating. Resident #347's care plan dated 05/06/21 documented resident at risk for complications related to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications due to Atrial Fibrillation. The goal:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to offer and provide Resident #147 with an alternative or substitute for his lunchmeal. Resident #147 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic diabetic wounds of right and left foot with status post bilateral transmetatarsal amputations and skin graft infections, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 4/30/21 and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident had the necessary cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident had no problems understanding the staff and was understood. The resident was assessed without mood or behavioral problems. Resident #147 required extensive assistance from 2 staff for bed mobility and toilet use. He was not assessed to be able to ambulate (walk in and out of room). He had bilateral lower extremity impairment in range of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure the Quality assurance and performance (QAPI) program include monitoring, and measuring performance activities. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain a QAPI plan for correcting quality deficiencies. During the survey conducted 05/04/21 through 05/12/21 indicated: In the area of (F-881) A review of the antibiotic Infection Control Surveillance Infection report log showed only the months of March, April, and May were available to view. During an interview on 05/10/21 at 6:00 PM with the Administrator, ADON and RDCS concerning Antibiotic Stewardship Program. They were asked if the ongoing review for antibiotic stewardship prior to the survey was complete. The ADON stated, We need to continue our reviews for February 2021. I don't see any other documentation from what was provided. The RDCS stated, They are working on it. April wasn't completed. In the area of (F-882) The facility staff failed to designate at least one qualified Infection Preventionist. Received Infection Prevention and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to implement corrective action and monitor to ensure the Quality assurance and performance (QAPI) program to ensure performance goals or targets are achieved. activities. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain a QAPI plan for correcting quality deficiencies. During the survey conducted 05/04/21 through 05/12/21 indicated: In the area of (F-881) A review of the antibiotic Infection Control Surveillance Infection report log showed only the months of March, April, and May were available to view. During an interview on 05/10/21 at 6:00 PM with the Administrator, ADON and RDCS concerning Antibiotic Stewardship Program. They were asked if the ongoing review for antibiotic stewardship prior to the survey was complete. The ADON stated, We need to continue our reviews for February 2021. I don't see any other documentation from what was provided. The RDCS stated, They are working on it. April wasn't completed. In the area of (F-882) The facility staff failed to designate at least one qualified Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facilitys staff failed to ensure infection control measures and practices were in place in the laundry room and 3 resident rooms on the quarantine unit (Room's 202, 204 and 207), in the survey sample. 1. The facility failed to ensure that all laundry was handled, stored, and processed in a safe and sanitary method. During the initial of the laundry on 5/4/21 at approximately 1:15 p.m., the following observations were made with the Housekeeping Supervisor present; Multiple Hoyer slings were observed on top of numerous pillows in the corner against the wall beside the washing machines. The Housekeeping supervisor stated they were slings which were no longer used therefore; they needed to be stored someplace and the pillows were there to be washed and returned to service. Many other Hoyer slings were hanging on the wall facing the washers and they made contact with the floor. The Housekeeping supervisor stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility document review staff interviews and family interview the facility staff failed to ensure one resident's daughter was called for a zoom care plan meeting after an invitation was sent for 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #5. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/10/21. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #5 was coded as a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. On 05/3/21 at 09:53 AM a phone interview was conducted with Resident #5. During the interview Resident #5 stated, My last care plan meeting my daughter received an invite but the facility never called her for the meeting. On 5/6/20 at 9:46 A.M. a phone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, a medical record view, staff interviews and family a interview the facility staff failed to follow-up with a resident's choice of an attending physician in March of 2020 to determine if the provider could meet the requirements for care for 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9. The finding included: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/18/21. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #9 was coded as a 12 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. On 5/4/21 at 2:00 P.M. a phone interview was conducted with Resident #9's daughter who is also the Complainant. Resident #9's daughter stated, I took my mother to a primary care physician outside of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure call bells were within resident reach for two of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #17 and #42. The findings included: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to type two diabetes without complications, obesity due to excess calories, atrial fibrillation, post COVID -19, and cognitive social or emotional deficit following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. Resident #17's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was an annual assessment with an ARD (Assessment reference date) of 12/31/20. Resident #17 was coded as being severely impaired in cognitive function scoring 05 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Resident #17 was coded as requiring total dependence on two staff members with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that the state inspection results were easily accessible to all residents. The findings included: On 5/5/21 at 9:57 a.m., a group interview was conducted with five residents. The five residents interviewed were not aware of where the state inspection results were located. On 5/5/21 at 11:00 a.m., observation of the state inspection results were conducted. The state survey results was in a large three ring binder sitting in a wall mount affixed to the wall. There was no table or anywhere to place the binder once it was out of the wall mount. The wall mount was at a level where it would be difficult for some residents to reach if sitting in a wheelchair. The survey result book also felt heavy. On 5/6/21 at approximately 3:55 p.m., a Resident that was in group (Resident #5); was asked if she could reach the state survey results. Resident #5 was wheelchair bound and had all ROM (Range of Motion) of her upper extremities. Resident #5 stated that she wouldn't be able to quite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility's staff failed to ensure privacy during wound care for 1 of 34 residents (Resident #7), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility 10/21/20 and has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; glaucoma, a seizure disorder, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, diabetes and coronary artery disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/28/21 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #7's cognitive abilities for daily decision making was intact. In sectionG (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of two people with transfers, toileting, and bathing, total care of one with off unit locomotion, extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility and dressing, extensive assistance of one person with personal hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff neglected to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 34 residents (R#147) in the survey sample and failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse resulting in needless pain for 1 of 34 residents (Resident #36), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #147 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic diabetic wounds of right and left foot with status post bilateral transmetatarsal amputations and skin graft infections, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 4/30/21 and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident had the necessary cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident had no problems understanding the staff and was understood. The resident was assessed without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to send all the necessary documentation; including care plan goals with the resident upon transfer to the hospital for 2 of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #17 and #346. The findings included: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to type two diabetes without complications, obesity due to excess calories, atrial fibrillation, post COVID -19, and cognitive social or emotional deficit following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. Resident #17's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was an annual assessment with an ARD (Assessment reference date) of 12/31/20. Resident #17 was coded as being severely impaired in cognitive function scoring 05 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #17's clinical record revealed that he was sent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed send a copy of the Bed-Hold Policy upon discharge/transfer for 1 of 34 resident's (Resident #346) after being transferred and admitted to the hospital. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #346 or his resident's representative was provided a copy of the bed hold policy upon discharge/transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #346 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #346 included but not limited to Acute Renal Failure. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. Review of Resident #346's admission assessment dated [DATE] documented the residents was independent in decisions regarding task of daily life, indicating no cognitive impairment. The Discharge MDS assessments was dated for 05/08/21 - discharged with return anticipated. On 05/08/21 at approximately 1:28 p.m., according to the facility's documentation, Resident #346…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed within seven (7) days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident 40. 1. For Resident #40, the facility staff failed to ensure resident had a comprehensive care plan developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to Vascular Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, Cerebrovascular Disease, Unspecified and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Other Circulatory Complications. Resident #40's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/05/2021 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #40 as requiring supervision of 1 with eating, extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility, transfer and dressing, total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility's documents, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample (Resident #346's) abdominal surgical wound had an alternate treatment until the primary treatment (a negative pressure wound vac) was available. 2. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. Review of Resident #346's admission assessment dated [DATE] documented the residents was independent in decisions regarding task of daily life, indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the admission Assessment was coded for having an abdominal surgical wound requiring surgical wound care (wound vac.) The admission Assessment under skin was coded for having an abdominal surgical wound - area measured 2.8 cm x 3.8 cm x 1.1 cm. Resident #346's record did not reveal a 48 hour baseline care or an interim care plan. Review of Resident's #346 discharge summary 05/03/21 read in part: Instructions for follow-up (Routine wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders to provide foot care for 1 of 34 residents (R#147) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #147 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic diabetic wounds of right and left foot with status post bilateral transmetatarsal amputations and skin graft infections, end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 4/30/21 and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident had the necessary cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #147 had no problems understanding the staff and was understood. Resident #147 was assessed without mood or behavioral problems. Resident #147 required extensive assistance from 2 staff for bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #147 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample received appropriate sized incontinent products for 3 days, Resident #5. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder and Hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an Annual with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/10/21. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #5 was coded as a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Under Section H Bladder and Bowel H0300 Urinary Continence and H0400 Bowel Incontinence Resident #5 was coded as a 2 Frequently Incontinent. Resident #5's current comprehensive care plan was reviewed and is documented in part, as follows: Focus: Name (Resident #5) has an alteration in elimination of bladder related to urinary urgency due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (Resident #346) in the survey sample had dialysis orders. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure dialysis order were obtained for Resident #346. Resident #346 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #346 included but are not limited to Acute Kidney Failure (on dialysis). The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not due. Review of Resident #346's admission assessment dated [DATE] documented the residents was independent in decisions regarding task of daily life, indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the admission Assessment under special treatment was coded for dialysis. The facility did not provide a dialysis care plan. Review of Physician Progress note dated 05/06/21 read in part: Resident #346 has a right IJ temporal dialysis catheter placement as his renal function worsened and he was started on hemodialysis. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the physician reviewed pharmacy recommendations for 2 residents (Resident #4, #43) of 34 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/09/2021 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The Minimum Data Set coded Resident #4 as requiring extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility and dressing, total dependence of 1 for eating and total dependence of 2 for transfer, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. On 05/05/2021 at approximately 2:00 p.m., review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed the following: Pharmacy Review dated 02/07/2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure that PRN (As Needed) orders for psychotropic medication was not ordered for longer than 14 days without a documented rationale for continued use for 1 resident (Resident #43) of 34 residents in the survey sample AND failed to implement Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) interventions for the use of psychotropic medication as used by Resident #15. The findings included: 1. Resident #43, the facility staff failed to ensure PRN (As Needed) Xanax was not ordered for longer than 14 days, without a documented rationale for continued use. Resident #43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #43 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Unspecified Fracture Of Left Femur and Depression. Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/12/2021 was not coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, observations, resident interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for all controlled drugs to include those brought from resident homes on admission for 1 of 34 residents (Resident #146) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #146 was admitted on [DATE] to receive respite/palliative care. He was discharged home on 5/5/21. There was no completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) due to the resident's short-stay. The History and Physical (H&P) dated 5/3/21 indicated that the resident was in the facility under the care of hospice for respite. He was alert and responsive. No Intravenous fluids to be given or laboratory specimens obtained. Resident was ordered Morphine Sulfate 20 mg/ml, give 0.5 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath. On 5/4/21 at 7:00 p.m. narcotic counts were observed by this surveyor (#2) for the facility's 2 medication carts, 100 and 200/300.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #147 was not able to chew and consume the meat served to him during the lunchmeal on 5/4/21. Resident #147 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic diabetic wounds of right and left foot with status post bilateral transmetatarsal amputations and skin graft infections, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 4/30/21 and coded the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15 out of a possible score of 15 which indicated the resident had the necessary cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident had no problems understanding the staff and was understood. The resident was assessed without mood or behavioral problems. Resident #147 required extensive assistance from 2 staff for bed mobility and toilet use. He was not assessed to be able to ambulate (walk in and out of room). He had bilateral lower extremity impairment in range of motion. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure on 5/10/21, the dishwasher temperature reached the appropriate wash temperature to sanitize the after breakfast dishes. The findings included: On 5/10/21 at approximately 9:50 a.m., observations of were made of the dishwashing machine during washing of the resident serving trays. After the first set of trays entered the cycle the dietary aide recorded the high wash temperature as 111 degrees and the high rinse temperature as 191 degrees. The trays were removed and placed on a rack which suspended each tray separately after-which another set of trays were put in the dishwasher, this time the high wash temperature only reached 109 degrees. On 5/1/21, at approximately 9:57 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Aide who stated the wash temperature requirement is 150 degrees and the rinse requirement temperature was 180 degrees. The Dietary Aide stated she would notify the District Dietary Manager that the dishwasher not reaching the recommended temperature and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and a review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to conduct an ongoing review for antibiotic stewardship for one person in a survey sample of 43 residents. The findings included: On 5/10/21 at approximately 12:45 PM., an appointment was made with the administrator concerning the Antibiotic Stewardship Program for 2:00 PM. On 5/10/21 A review of the antibiotic Infection Control Surveillance infection report log showed that only the months of March, April and May were available to view. The months of January and February were not available. No other supporting documents or forms were available to view per onsite surveyor. On 5/10/21 at approximately 3:25 PM a review of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program was conducted with the ADON (Acting Director of Nursing) and with the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS). The Director of Clinical Services stated, If a staff recognize a person is suspicious for infection they go to the DON (Director of Nursing) for Skin infections, UTI's (Urinary Tract Infections) or fever of unknown origin we do a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and a review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to designate at least one qualified Infection Preventionist. The findings included: On 5/06/21 at approximately 9:15 AM an interview was conducted with the ADON (Acting Director of Nursing) Concerning the Infection Preventionist (IP). He stated, We had an Infection Control Nurse (RN #3) but she left abruptly on April 28th. I'm assuming the role. I registered for class on yesterday. I'm going to try to start the training this weekend. He was asked by the said surveyor if he could email the Infection Control Training certificate of the former Infection Control Preventionist as well as a copy of his registration for the Infection Control class. He stated, Okay. Received Infection Prevention and Control Certificates of Training on 5/07/21 for RN #3. The certificates show that out of fifteen modules only 14 were completed. Module #7 was not available. The following email was sent to the Administrator on 5/07/21 at approximately 9:38 AM after receiving RN #3's Infection Prevention Training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation. The facility staff failed to implement COVID-19 testing to all staff. The findings include: The facility staff failed to test five nursing staff during their twice weekly COVID-19 testing. Therefore, increasing the chances of spreading COVID-19. A review of the as worked schedule and Employee COVID-19 consent forms reveal that the following nursing staff were not tested for COVID-19. LPN (License Practical Nurse) #15, CNA (Certified Nurses Aide) #1 and CNA #7 worked on 5/03/21 (Monday). LPN #3 worked on 5/05/21 (Wednesday). LPN #1 and LPN #7 worked on 5/06/21 (Thursday). LPN #15 and CNA #5 worked on 5/07/2. CNA #5 worked on 5/09/21. An interview was conducted on 5/06/21 at approximately 2:55 PM with CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #1 concerning the COVID-19 test. She stated, We get tested twice weekly. Monday and Thursday. I received my first COVID19 vaccine shot on yesterday. An interview was conducted with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #15 on 5/10/21 at approximately 9:15 PM., Concerning the COVID-19 testing at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-16 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 Residents (#39) in the survey sample was seen by a physician or his/her designee at least every 60 days. Findings included: Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to *Chronic Pulmonary Edema and *Depression. Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/05/19 coded Resident #39 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of a possible score of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #39 total dependence of two with toilet use and transfer, total dependence of one with bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene for Activities of Daily Living care. Review of the clinical record revealed Physician's progress notes only for 09/18/18 and 6/20/19. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that opened food products were properly dated, labeled, and stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included: On 08/14/2019 at 11:15 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager an open carton of *Med Plus 2.0 Vanilla (a fortified nutritional shake) and an opened carton of Thickened Orange Juice was observed in the reach in refrigerator. They were not dated with an opened date or use by date. The Dietary Manager was asked, Should the staff date the cartons when they open them and date them with a use by date? The Dietary Manager stated, Yes, the staff should have dated them. They just forgot to date them. The Dietary Manager stated, I will throw them away. At approximately 11:25 a.m., walked into the walk in freezer accompanied by the Dietary Manager and noted a cardboard box sitting on the shelf. The Dietary Manager was asked, What is inside the cardboard box? The Dietary Manager took the box down off the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene practices to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infections; and failed for one of 35 residents, Resident #154's, Foley catheter tubing and bag in a manner in accordance with infection control standards and practices to help prevent associated urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. On 08/15/2019 during a follow up visit in the kitchen, the following observations were made: At approximately 11:50 a.m., [NAME] #3 was observed washing her hands with soap and water for 5 seconds. At approximately 12:00 p.m., [NAME] #2 was observed washing his hands with soap and water for 5 seconds. At approximately 12:10 p.m., the Dietary Manager was observed washing his hands with soap and water for 5 seconds. On 08/15/2019 at 1:00 p.m. the surveyor reviewed hand washing observations with the Dietary Manager. The Dietary Manager was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed for 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample, to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected Resident #22's status. The findings included: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Resident #22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/10/2019 was coded with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded Resident #22 as requiring extensive assistance of 1 with dressing and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of 2 with bed mobility, transfer and toilet use. On 08/15/2019 review of Resident #22's Quarterly MDS, Section P- Restraints, revealed that the resident was coded as using Bed Rails less than daily. On 08/15/2019…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to implement an approach listed in the residents Comprehensive Person-Centered Plan of Care for 2 of 35 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 154 & #10). The facility failed to implement an indwelling catheter securement device for Resident #154 and failed to administer medications for seizure disorder and Parkinson's Disease for Resident #10. The findings include: 1. Resident #154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling Foley catheter for diagnoses of BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia-an enlarged prostate gland that can cause urination difficulty) and UTI (urinary tract infection). The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) an admission with an assessment reference date of 7/22/19 coded the resident as having long and short term memory deficits and severely impaired daily decision making skills. The resident was coded as having an indwelling catheter (a plastic tube inserted into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to revise two of 35 residents (Resident #30 and #39) comprehensive person-centered care plans in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #30's comprehensive person-centered care plan to include the use of an indwelling Foley catheter. Resident #30 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current diagnosis included but not limited to pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage IV. Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment protocol), a significant change MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/21/19 coded the resident with a 13 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #30 as total dependence of two with bathing, extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene for Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide one resident (Resident #10) in the survey sample of 35 residents, with physician ordered medications. The findings included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, muscle weakness, Parkinson's Disease, Convulsions, shortness of breath and dysphagia. A review of the clinical records indicated Resident #10 was not provided physician ordered Keppra (a medication used for the treatment of seizure disorder) and Carbidopa-Levodopa (a medication used for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease symptoms). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed this resident as having unclear speech and not able to make herself understood. This resident rarely understood and rarely understood others. This resident's vision was highly impaired. In the area of Activities of Daily Living this resident was assessed as requiring extensive assistance in the area of transfer, dressing, eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample received appropriate care and services to prevent complications from an indwelling Foley catheter, Resident # 154. The findings include: Resident #154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling Foley catheter for diagnoses of BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia-an enlarged prostate gland that can cause urination difficulty) and UTI (urinary tract infection). The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) an admission with an assessment reference date of 7/22/19 coded the resident as having both long and short term memory deficits and severely impaired daily decision making skills. The resident was coded as having an indwelling catheter (a plastic tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). The Comprehensive Person-Centered Plan of Care dated 7/16/19 identified that the resident had a potential for Urinary Tract Infection due to the presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample respiratory care equipment was maintained in a manner to ensure optimal functioning, Resident #49. The fixtures on both sides of the oxygen concentrator cabinet that hold the external air filters in place were missing. The findings include: Resident #49 had a re-admission date of 7/3/19 with diagnoses to include, but not limited to: chronic respiratory failure, sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The resident was coded as scoring a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating the resident's cognition was intact. The admission physician's orders dated 7/4/19 included an order to administer oxygen at 2 liters as needed for shortness of breath. The Comprehensive Person-Centered Plan of Care dated 7/4/19 identified the resident was at risk for sleep pattern disturbance. The goals listed were that the resident would not exhibit any sleep related behavioral symptoms and will express feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to provide pharmacy services to one resident (Resident #10) in the survey sample of 35 residents. Resident #10 was not provided physician ordered Keppra (a medication used for the treatment of seizure disorder) due to the medication not being available. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure medications were available in accordance with physician orders. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, muscle weakness, Parkinson's Disease, Convulsions, shortness of breath and dysphagia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed this resident as having unclear speech and not able to make herself understood. This resident rarely understood and rarely understood others. This residents vision was highly impaired. This resident was not assessed in the area of Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). In the area of Activities of Daily Living this resident was assessed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (Xanax-anxiety medication) was limited to 14 days for 1 out of 35 residents (Resident #27) in the survey sample who was receiving a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication. The findings included: The physician did not do an evaluation of Resident #27 to extend the psychotropic medication past 14 days nor document the rational and duration in the resident's medical record. Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility 02/28/19. Diagnosis for Resident #27 included but not limited to *Dementia without behavioral disturbances and Anxiety. Resident #27's MDS, a significant change with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/18/19 coded resident with a BIMS score of 08 out of a possible 15 moderate cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS with an ARD of 06/18/19, under section E (Behaviors), coded Resident #27 for exhibiting verbal behaviors directed towards others 1-3 days each week. Resident #27's comprehensive care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-16 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility documentation the facility staff failed to notify the physician and/or his designee of laboratory results for 1 of 35 resident (Resident #24) in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to report to the physician Resident #24's abnormal lab results of a high Hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C), resulting in a delay in medical treatment. Resident #24 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #24 included but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM.) Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS), quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/12/19 coded the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score an 03 out of a possible 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident is extensive assistance of one with bed mobility and bathing, limited assistance of one with dressing and personal hygiene and supervision with transfer and toilet use for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Resident #24's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TRIO HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL VIRGINIA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/16/2016 |
| TRIO HEALTH CARE - EAST, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/24/2019 |
| TRIO HEALTHCARE INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/16/2016 |
| TRIO HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2019 |
| GENTRY, BOYD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/16/2016 |
| RUBENSTEIN, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/16/2016 |
| SCHLAIKOWSKI, AMANDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/12/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $305K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.