Lynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the facility's 2024-2025 Fall/Winter Menu, the facility's recipe for Pureed Bread, the facility's Scoop Size chart, the facility's Diet Master, and the facility's policies for Menu Planning and Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line Service; the facility failed to provide the approved portions of puree meat and puree bread for Lunch on 10/08/2024 and 10/09/2024. This had the potential to affect 5 of 5 residents receiving Puree Diets. Findings include: The facility's policy for Menu Planning, dated 2023, included the following: . Policy: Nutritional needs of individuals will be provided in accordance with the established national standards . through nourishing, well-balanced diets . Procedure: 1. Menu planning will be completed by the facility . a. Regular and therapeutic menus will be written to provide a variety of foods . in adequate amounts . to satisfy recommended daily allowances. 4. The registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) or designee will approve all menus. The facility's policy for Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line Service, dated 2023, included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the facility's 2024-2025 Fall/Winter Menu, the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, the facility's Diet Master, and the facility's policies for Purpose and Objectives of the Food and Nutrition Services Department and Resource: Minimum Cooking, Holding and Reheating Temperatures; the facility failed to ensure Puree Scalloped Potatoes were reheated to a minimum of 165 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) for 15 seconds after cooling to 125°F on 10/08/2024, prior to the residents' Lunch service. This had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed meals from the kitchen out of 108 residents receiving meals from the facility kitchen. Findings include: The 2022 U.S. FDA Food Code included the following: . 3-403.11 Reheating for Hot Holding. (A) . TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD that is cooked, cooled, and reheated for hot holding shall be reheated so that all parts of the FOOD reach a temperature of at least 74°C [Centigrade/Celsius] (165°F) for 15 seconds. The facility's policy for Purpose and Objectives of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, hospital record review, and review of a facility policy titled, Change in Medical Condition of Residents, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) and/or Certified Registered Nurse Practitioners (CRNPs) were notified when Resident Identifier (RI) #320, a resident with a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors, attempted to touch a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) between her legs and grabbed a therapist on the buttocks on 02/19/2024. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Change in Medical Condition of Residents, with an effective date of 01/22/2024, revealed the following: PURPOSE: To keep the physician, who is in charge of medical care . informed of the residents medical condition so they may direct the plan of care as needed. STANDARD: Notification of the physician . should occur promptly, according to federal regulations, when there is a change in the residents condition. A change in condition is defined as: . A significant change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview, review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source, Exploitation, review of the facility's investigative file and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the State Agency, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse involving Resident Identifier (RI) #320 and RI #71 on 02/22/2024, was submitted to the State Agency within the required timeframe of two hours. This deficient practiced affected one of 17 FRIs reviewed for timely reporting of allegations of abuse. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00047058. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source, Exploitation, with a revision date of 05/01/2024, revealed the following: PURPOSE: . Certain incidents and accidents involving residents must also be reported to the appropriate state…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source, Exploitation, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and obtain witness statements from all staff who witnessed Resident Identifier (RI) #320 put his/her hand under RI #71's blouse on 02/22/2024. Interviews with staff, the facility's timeline of events, and investigative documentation contained conflicting information. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source, Exploitation, with a revision date of 05/01/2024, revealed the following: PURPOSE: . The facility will investigate and document all incidents and accidents involving residents . The investigation protocol for incidents and accidents is set forth in Section VI of this Policy . VI. Investigations and Facility Response…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the Centers for Medicare & (and) Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #70's Significant Change (SC) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/2024, was coded accurately. The MDS indicated that RI #70 received an anticoagulant medication during that look back assessment period, but RI #70 did not. This deficient practice affected RI #70, one of 47 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated 10/2019, revealed the following: . SECTION N: MEDICATIONS . Coding Instructions . N0410E, Anticoagulant . Record the number of days an anticoagulant medication was received by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period . RI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review and review of a facility policy titled, Distressed Behavior Management Program, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #320's sexually inappropriate behaviors were addressed and managed with appropriate interventions. On 02/09/2024, the facility admitted RI #320 who had a documented history of inappropriate behaviors including groping. On 02/12/2024 a care plan was developed to address inappropriate sexual advances toward females. On 02/19/2024, RI #320 attempted to place his/her hands between a Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA's) legs and placed his/her hands on a physical therapist's buttocks. There was no evidence of discussions for behavior management, no new interventions implemented to manage RI #320's inappropriate sexual behaviors after the 02/19/2024 incidents, and no evidence the Medical Director (MD) or Certified Registered Nurse Practitioners (CRNPs) were notified of RI #320's inappropriate sexual behaviors on 02/19/2024. Findings Include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-02-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, the facility failed to ensure two (Resident Identifiers [RI] #20 and #92) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications who received an antipsychotic and/or antidepressant medication were monitored for side effects of the medications. This had the potential to affect 36 residents whom the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 02/10/2022, indicated received antipsychotic medication and 70 residents who received antidepressant medication. Findings included: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy and procedure, revised 01/01/2022, documented . 8. All medications used to treat behaviors should be monitored for: . Efficacy, . Risks, . Benefits, and . Harm or adverse consequences. RI #92's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. RI #92 had diagnoses which included Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Mood Disorder, and Major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-02-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interview, and review of the facility's General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility had a medication error rate of 10%, which resulted from three errors in 30 opportunities and affected three (Resident Identifiers [RI] #19, #22, and #38) of six residents observed receiving medications during the medication pass observation. One hundred twelve residents resided in the facility. Findings included: The facility's General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration policy and procedure, revised 01/01/2013, section 3.7 indicated, Facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct. The policy further indicated in section 4.1.1, the facility staff should: Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication. RI #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-02-11 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #35 was invited and allowed to participate in care plan conferences. This deficient practice affected RI #35, one of one resident reviewed for care plan participation. Findings included: The facility admitted RI #35 on 09/28/2020. During an interview on 02/09/2022 at 11:36 AM, RI #35 stated that they had never been to a care planning meeting, and they would like to attend. During an interview on 02/11/2022 at 10:03 AM, Employee Identifier (EI) #10, Licensed Social Worker (LSW), stated that residents were invited to care plan meetings and it was documented in Point Click Care (PCC). EI #10 stated RI #35 had not attended any care plan meetings. EI #10 stated they could not locate any documentation of RI #35 having been invited to care plan meetings. During an interview on 02/11/2022 at 3:20 PM, EI #1, Nursing Home Administrator, stated the facility was supposed to let the resident know about care conference meetings and depending on their interest and ability to participate, the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL