No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Snow Hill Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

430 West Market Street, Snow Hill, MD 21863 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 69 certified beds · (410) 632-3755 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 632-3755 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6040 Public Landing Road, C/O Worcester County Health D · (410) 629-6580 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Market St. · (410) 632-3500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Your Stop0.4 mi
426 W Market St · (410) 632-0607 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Byrd Park0.2 mi
400 Dighton Ave · (410) 632-5404 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.3%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.8%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.0%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.1%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.2%13.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.2%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.3%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.8%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.811.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.781.201.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 198 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.1%CMS range 34.1–46.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.7–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.9%CMS range 6.5–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-08)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to safely store food items and maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations. This was identified during multiple observations of kitchen food service operations. The findings include:On 05/04/2026 at 7:40 AM an initial tour was conducted of the facility's kitchen. During the tour, the surveyor inspected a vertical reach in cooler which revealed: two opened packs of uncooked hotdogs- no date opened label, one 48 ounce opened bottle of grape jelly- no date opened label, one two-pound opened bag of Genoa Salami- no date opened label. The Food Service Director (FSD) #4 removed the items and discarded them in the trash. On 05/04/2026 at 7:49 AM the surveyor and FSD #4 toured the walk-in freezer. The tour revealed the walk in freezer contained several brown boxes, with ice on the outside surface of the two stacked boxes directly under the internal fan and a substantial amount of ice also on the floor of the walk-in freezer- directly below the boxes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment of resident care was kept clean, comfortable, safe, and sanitary for resident use. This was evident for all environmental tours conducted on the recertification survey.The findings include: During an interview with Resident #4 on 05/04/2026 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor observed the resident's split top overbed table with l food or drink residue on the top surface and within the sliding tracks. On 05/04/2026 at 10:56 AM during an observation with the Maintenance Director (MD) in Resident #4's room, the surveyor pointed out the dirt and debris on Resident #4's overbed table. Before the survey and the MD left the resident's room, the MD confirmed that the table will be replaced immediately. On 5/04/2026 at 11:10 AM the surveyor and the Maintenance Director (MD) toured the Cypress Unit and the Cypress extended Unit. The surveyor also observed extremely rusted towel racks in several resident bathrooms on the Cypress Unit. The MD confirmed that the facility will audit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interview, facility personnel records review, and review of facility policies it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization of multi-resident use equipment. This was evident for 3 of 3 medication administration observations for residents (#27, #14, and #21) conducted during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 05/08/2026 at 8:09 AM the surveyor observed Registered Nurse, RN #31 measure Resident #27's blood pressure with a manual blood pressure measuring device. Before retrieving Resident #27's medications from the medication cart, RN #31 placed the blood pressure measuring device on the cart and did not sanitize the device. On 05/08/2026 at 8:30 AM the surveyor observed RN #31 measure Resident #14's blood pressure with a manual blood pressure measuring device. Before retrieving Resident #14's medications from the medication cart, RN #31 placed the blood pressure measuring device on the cart and did not sanitize the device. On 05/08/2026 at 9:22 AM the surveyor observed RN #31 measure Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with a written notice and reason for the room change before the resident was moved. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #6) of 33 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/5/2026 at 11:01 AM, Resident #6's medical records were reviewed and showed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #6's census showed that the resident had moved between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], five times since 2/6/2026. A provider progress note dated 4/22/2026 included the statement, patient was examined at bedside today. [They are] upset that [they] woke up to find [their] belongings being transferred out of [their] unit as [they were] being transferred to another room. A social services (SS) progress note dated 4/22/2026 had the statement, SS met with patient at bedside to discuss room move and [their] feelings about the move. Patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure information regarding advance directives was offered and documented for residents. This was evident for 2 (Residents #5 and #9) of 8 residents reviewed for advance directives.The findings include:On 05/04/2026 at 1:51 PM, review of the electronic medical record for Resident #9 showed no advance directive for the resident and no documentation indicating information regarding advance directives had been offered.On 05/04/2026 at 2:04 PM, review of the electronic medical record for Resident #5, who had a documented guardian, showed no advance directive for the resident and no documentation indicating information regarding advance directives had been offered.On 05/06/2026 at 9:35 AM, during an interview, Staff #14 was asked for assistance locating documentation showing advance directive information had been offered to Residents #5 and #9. Staff #14 stated offering advance directive information would not have been appropriate because the residents could not formulate an advance directive. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews of financial statements, it was determined that the facility failed to explain or justify the proration calculation for a 3-day resident stay and applied a retroactive Medicaid billing change across multiple months without an active agency determination letter. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (Resident #72) during the investigation of complaint #2803485 during the recertification survey.The findings include:The Maryland Medicaid Contribution of Care (patient liability) is the amount of monthly income a long-term care Medicaid recipient must pay directly to their nursing home or long-term care provider.When an individual qualifies for Institutional Medicaid, they do not get to keep all their monthly income (such as Social Security, pensions, or VA benefits). Medicaid calculates their available income after allowing specific, legal deductions. The recipient pays this amount to the facility, and Maryland Medicaid pays the remaining balance of the monthly nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an allegation involving a resident elopement was reported to the State Agency within the required time frame. This is evident for 1 (Incident #2989264) of 2 facility reported incidents investigated during the annual survey.The findings include:On 05/05/2026 at 12:46 PM, review of documentation provided by the facility showed the facility became aware of Resident #9's elopement incident on 04/17/2026 at 2:15 PM. Review further showed the initial report to the State Agency was submitted on 04/20/2026 at 6:09 PM per email documentation and at 5:45 PM per the actual report submitted. The five-day follow-up report was submitted on 04/27/2026.On 05/07/2026 at 9:17 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated she did not have additional information regarding the three-day delay in reporting the elopement, as the previous NHA and Director of Nursing (DON) were employed at the facility at that time. The NHA stated she would follow up with the current DON. No further information was provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were provided notice of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital and/or that the bed-hold policy was maintained for review. This was evident for 3 (Residents #5, 58, and 59) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge process. The findings include:On 05/04/2026 at 10:41 AM, review of the electronic medical record (EMAR) revealed Resident #5 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and no bed-hold policy was located in the EMAR. At 1:20 PM, EMAR review revealed Resident #58 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] and no bed-hold policy was located in the EMAR.05/05/2026 at 8:07 AM, EMAR review revealed Resident #59 was hospitalized on [DATE] and no bed-hold policy was documented in the EMAR. At 10:15 AM, EMAR review revealed Resident #5 was sent to the hospital again on 04/24/2026 and no bed-hold policy was documented in the EMAR. On 05/06/2026 at 9:35 AM, during an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of the resident's enrollment in hospice. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #63) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice services during the recertification survey.The findings include:The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A significant change in status MDS is required when a resident enrolls in a hospice program within 14 days of enrollment of services.On 5/5/2026 at 12:00 PM, Resident #63's medical records were reviewed and showed the resident was admitted to hospice services on 3/20/2026. Resident #63's most recent MDS (quarterly) had an assessment referral date (ARD) of 4/2/2026. Under Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and resident and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident with advance notice of care planning conferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #43) of 1 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 05/04/2026 at 9:09 AM the surveyor interviewed Resident #43. During the interview it was revealed that the resident does not and never has received advanced notification of planned care plan conferences from the facility. The resident stated that his/her representative received notifications from the facility and then would inform him/her of the conferences. On 05/05/2026 at 7:34 AM a review of Resident # 43's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed a copy of the notice of a scheduled care plan conference was addressed to the resident's representative and no further information was found to show that that the resident was given advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents as evidenced by a resident eating solid food while on nothing by mouth (NPO) diet restrictions and 2) ensure adequate supervision for a vulnerable, cognitively impaired resident which resulted in elopement. This was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #6 and #9) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents during the recertification survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following these incidents prior to the start of this survey. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore, this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 4/25/2026. The findings include: NPO most commonly stands for the Latin phrase nil per os, meaning nothing by mouth. It is medical instruction requiring a patient to avoid eating or drinking. Someone with enteral feeding (tube feeding) is often placed on an NPO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a nurse aide completed required dementia training and competency evaluation within 120 days of employment. This is evident for 1 (Staff #22) of 5 employee records reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 05/06/2026 at 2:00 PM, review of the employee file for Staff #22 revealed no documentation of completed dementia training or competency evaluation. Staff #22 had been employed by the facility for at least 9 months, with a hire date in July 2025.On 05/07/2026 at 8:29 AM, during an interview, Staff #8 was informed of the concern regarding the absence of dementia training and competency evaluation documentation for Staff #22. Staff #8 stated she would look in the former Director of Nursing's files for the documentation.On 05/07/2026 at 8:34 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that if the dementia training and competency evaluation program documentation was not in the employee folder, it was probably not completed for Staff #22.No further documentation was provided by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain garbage and refuse. This was evident for 2 of 2 observations conducted during the recertification survey.The findings include: On 05/04/2026 at 7:35 AM the surveyor observed two blue dumpster containers located at the back of the facility. The two dumpsters were uncovered overflowing with bagged trash, and loose trash items on the ground between the two containers. On 05/04/2026 at 8:14 AM, the surveyor observed that the loose trash was removed from the ground between the two dumpsters, however, the trash remained uncovered, overflowing at the top of both dumpsters.On 05/04/2026 at 10 AM the Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed that trash pick up was to occur since Thursday 04/30/2026 and he placed a call to the trash removal company on 05/04/2026 to inquire about the missed service and to expedite removal on 05/04/2026.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation of Covid-19 vaccine administration. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #15) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 5/7/2026 at 9:15 AM, the facility's Covid-19 vaccination policy was reviewed. Section 21 subsection b. stated that The resident's medical record will include documentation of the following: b. Each dose of the vaccine administered to the resident.On 5/7/2026 at 1:15 PM, Resident #15's 2025 vaccine consent form was reviewed. It was signed by the resident on 10/16/2025 and stated yes to consent for the Covid-19 and flu vaccinations. Additional review of Resident #15's medical chart showed documentation that the flu vaccine was administered on 10/16/2026 but did not reveal documentation that the resident received the Covid-19 vaccine.On 5/8/2026 at 9:54 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the billing statement for Resident #15 for their flu vaccination. The DON stated the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a functioning house wide call bell system. This was evident for all residents residing in the facility's 2 nursing units. The findings include: During an observation of the Cypress Unit on 02/02/26 at 4:08 pm, the nurse surveyor observed resident call bell lights lit above rooms but there was not an audible signal alerting the staff that a residents in rooms were requesting staff assistance. Closer observations of the call bell panel behind the nurse's station/desk, revealed tape covering the enunciator speaker and the enunciator was set to produce a low tone. After several seconds, the enunciator did elicit a sound, but the sound was not audible to this nurse surveyor, the staff or residents walking or sitting on the unit. Further observations of the Federal nursing unit on 02/02/26 revealed the resident call bell light above room [ROOM NUMBER] was light but there was not an audible signal alerting the staff that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a closed and active clinical record and administrative records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to follow the physician's specific pulse and blood pressure parameters before administering cardiac medications. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed during a complaint survey, The findings include: 1) On 01/03/26 the Office of Health Care Quality received a complaint with concerns about resident safety and the quality of care being provided to Resident #1. Review of Resident #1's clinical record on 02/02/26 revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had been deemed incapable of making all medical decisions by 2 physicians on 07/31/25 and 08/12/25. Further review of Resident #1's clinical record on 02/02/26 revealed a physician's order dated 01/16/26 instructing the nursing staff to administer the medication, Midodrine, 10 milligrams (mg), orally, three times a day for a systolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of facility reported incident and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of suspected resident abuse to the local police. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 09/05/25 the Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident concerning allegations that on Sunday 08/31/25 a nursing staff member (LPN#1) told Resident #3 nursing staff to not to provide care and that S/he was not going to administer any pain medication to Resident #3. The Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's health care facilities and community-based programs. Allegations of abuse are to be reported to the Office of Healthcare Quality and the local police in a timely manner. A review of the facility investigation into the allegation of abuse on 02/03/26 revealed a 5-day follow-up investigation report that indicated Resident #3's responsible party…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a facility reported incident, a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain psychiatric consultation for Resident #3 after the facility concluded an abuse investigation and determined Resident #3 should be referred to the facility psychiatric services. This is evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 09/05/25 the Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident concerning allegations that on Sunday 08/31/25 a nursing staff member (LPN#1) told nursing staff providing care to Resident #3 to not to provide care and that S/he (LPN#1) was also not going to administer any pain medication to Resident #3. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: muscle atrophy, a lack of coordination, difficulty walking, depression, Gout and osteomyelitis of a wound. Resident #3 was deemed capable of making medical decisions by his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a closed medical record and all pertinent administrative records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:Documentation is an integral part of medication administration. Documentation communicates the timing, dosing, and effect of any medications received by a patient. In the setting of skilled nursing care, residents are often prescribed multiple medications for significant medical conditions. They are also often more vulnerable to medication errors and more prone to changes in conditions that require review and adjustment of their medication regimen. Inaccurate medication documentation has the potential to place residents at significant risk of medication error, provide incomplete or inaccurate information for providers and care givers to evaluate, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to meet proper internal cooking temperatures and failed to ensure beverages were served at an appropriate temperature. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation within the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume meals. The findings include: 1. On 02/19/25 at 11:59 AM, the surveyors observed the food line preparation for lunch. The Dietary Manager began taking the temperature for the food on the steam tray line. During the observation, the mashed potatoes temperature reached 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The appropriate temperature of hot foods on the steam table is 135 degrees or higher. Additionally, the mechanical ground chicken temperature was 120 degrees F and the fried chicken was 120 degrees F. These did not reach the proper final internal temperature of 165 degrees F. The Dietary Manager had asked Dietary [NAME] #41 to take the food and reheat it. The Dietary Manager further stated that she would have the Maintenance Director take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure its Infection Preventionist met the mandatory qualifications for the position. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: An Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This position requires specialized training in infection control. During an interview on 12/20/25 at 1:02 PM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). She confirmed she was the Infection Preventionist for the facility. The ADON reported she has a college degree in nursing but hasn't completed specialized training in infection control. During a review of a copy of an e-mail and a computer screenshot on 2/20/25 at 3:32 PM, it revealed the e-mail was dated as received on 2/20/25 at 1:13 PM. The email was a confirmation the ADON had registered for an Infection Prevention and Control course with Train Maryland - Maryland Department of Health. A review of the computer screenshot revealed she was currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care to dependent residents. This was evident for 4 (#12, #42, #47, #63) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents of long-term care facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The MDS contains items that measure physical, psychological and psycho-social functioning. The items in the MDS give a multidimensional view of the patient's functional capacities. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care is a term used to collectively describe fundamental skills required to care for oneself, such as bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring (getting in and out of bed or chair), eating, and continence. On 02/18/25 at 3:43 PM, Resident #47 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored. This was evident for 2 of 2 medication carts observed for medication storage during the annual survey. The findings include: During an observation of the Cypress Hall medication cart on 2/18/25 at 1:32 PM with nurse #31 and Consultant Pharmacist #32 it was discovered that there were expired medications and undated open medications. The expired medications and undated open medications were removed by the Consultant Pharmacist after being discovered. Expired medications include: Ondansetron 4mg tablets expired on 2/08/25 for Resident #45. [NAME] Milk of Magnesia Suspension 400/5mL, House stock expired on 2/09/25. Good Neighbor Pharmacy Cough Suppressant expired on 10/24. A Basaglar injection pen 100 units was labeled with the Date Opened as 1/16/25 for Resident #32. The instructions advise to Use a pen for up to 28 days after first use then throw away. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store/prepare food under sanitary conditions. This was found to be evident during the Kitchen Observations. The findings include: During the initial brief tour of the kitchen on 02/18/25 at 08:43 AM, it was observed that [NAME] #4 and Dietary Aide #5 were not wearing hair nets while preparing food. On 02/18/25 at 08:43 AM an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager. The surveyors made her aware of the staff that had not been wearing the hairnets. On 02/18/25 at 08:45 AM, an observation of the temperature logs for the reach-in fridge showed it was not filled out. For February 2025, only the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 10th day had temperatures logged. Inside the reach-in fridge, it revealed multiple food items that were opened and unlabeled. There was sliced turkey, 4 packages of American cheese, corned beef, green peppers, 3 packages of mozzarella cheese, a gallon of lemon juice, stuffed cabbage, cottage cheese, and pureed fruit. There was also personal food, a Sunday brunch bake cheese, a small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that oxygen administration equipment and nebulization masks were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use and 2) ensure that the environment was maintained in a manner that minimized the potential spread of infection. This was evident for 1 (#42) out of 28 sampled residents and 1 random observation of the laundry room during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. A nebulization mask is a device that covers the nose and mouth to deliver medication directly into the lungs. A nasal cannula is a thin, flexible tube that delivers oxygen through the nose. An oxygen concentrator is a medical device that increases the amount of oxygen in the air. On 2/18/25 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor observed a nebulization mask placed on top of Resident #42's nightstand without any covering and label. On 2/18/25 at 11:07 AM, the surveyor requested Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) inside Resident #42's room and was asked to verify the concern. LPN #1 acknowledged the concern and placed the mask inside a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the residents with the opportunity to choose their shower schedules. This was evident for 2 ( Resident #65 and #14) of 2 residents reviewed for choices during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 2/18/25 at 9:11 AM, in an interview with Resident #65, he/she revealed that he/she was not aware of his/her shower schedule. He/she added that he/she had been in the facility for several weeks and had inquired several times about his/her schedule from the staff but had not heard any updates. On 2/18/25 at 9:47 AM, Resident #14 stated that he/she had no idea when his/her shower schedule was and added that it would be good if he/she knew the schedule. On 2/19/25 at 8:35 AM, a review of the active physician orders for showers revealed that Resident #14 was scheduled every Tuesday and Friday 3-11 shift, however, Resident #65 had no order in place. On 2/19/25 at 8:57 AM, in an interview with Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA #12), she described that at the beginning of the shift, the charge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and facility record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that facility records for abuse and neglect were maintained for correction of alleged violations and completed investigations. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #18, #28 and #219) out of 5 Residents reviewed for investigation and correction of alleged violations of abuse and neglect. The findings include: 1. On 2/19/25 a review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00189291 revealed that on 2/21/23, Resident #170 was observed in the room of Resident #18 with their hand on the clothed thigh of Resident #18. The incident was reported to Office of Health Care Quality on 02/23/23. The summary of the incident stated that Resident #18 was assessed and was not negatively impacted by the incident. Resident #170, had a diagnosis of Dementia and was adjusting to a new environment. Him/her had medication changes and the facility worked to find the correct medications for him/her. After the incident, Resident #170 was placed on 1:1 sitter observation until a psychiatric evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #65) of 28 residents reviewed for baseline care plans during the recertification survey. The findings include: The baseline care plan is a document that outlines how to provide care for a new nursing home resident. It's created within 48 hours of admission. The plan's purpose is to reduce the risk of adverse events and ensure the resident receives quality care. On 2/19/25 at 12:47 PM, a review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 1/31/25. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence that a baseline care plan was developed, and a copy of the document was given to the resident. On 2/19/25 at 1:20 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #7), he/she revealed that normally, the Director of Nursing (DON)/ Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) took care of the baseline care plans and nurses just added interventions by clicking the care plan tab in the electronic health record. On 2/19/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for the use of oxygen. This was evident for 1 (Resident #42) of 28 residents reviewed care plans during the recertification survey. The findings include: A nasal cannula is a thin, flexible tube that delivers oxygen through the nose. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 2/18/25 at 10:17 AM, Resident #42 was observed lying in bed and oxygen was noted in use via nasal cannula at 2 liters/minute. On 2/19/25 at 10:39 AM, a review of Resident #42's care plan did not show any evidence that a care plan for oxygen use was developed. On 2/19/25 at 12:14 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she revealed that care plans were initiated upon admission and as needed. She stated that the Resident Assessment Coordinator (RAC) would initiate resident care plans based on medical diagnoses, Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop/revise care plans to meet residents' needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #63) of 28 residents reviewed for care planning The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of residents in nursing homes. The information collected helps nursing home staff identify health problems and develop individual care plans for residents. Resident # 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypotension, Diabetes, Dementia and Muscle Weakness. On 02/19/25 at 07:25 AM a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) that physician laboratory orders were performed as ordered, 2) medications were administered as ordered and 3) a resident received proper cardiac monitoring. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #65, #45, and #12) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP) are two common blood tests used to assess overall health and detect potential medical conditions. On 2/19/25 at 12:47 PM, a review of the active physician orders of Resident #65 indicated a laboratory order of CBC, CMP one time a day every Tuesday for monitoring for 4 Weeks. The order started on 2/04/2025 and would end on 3/04/2025. However, after further review of the medical records, it revealed that CBC and CMP were not performed for 3 consecutive Tuesdays, 2/4/2025, 2/11/2025 and 2/18/2025 as ordered. On 2/19/25 at 1:20 PM, in an interview with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#7), he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment to promote healing and 2) implement the recommendations made by the wound clinic to the resident with pressure ulcer. This was evident for 2 (Resident #12 and #42) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1. According to the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the definition of a pressure ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue(s). These lesions typically occur in areas of the body that have a lot of pressure applied. Pressure ulcers most often arise on skin that covers bony areas of the body, such as heels, ankles, hips and tailbone (coccyx). Measures to help prevent or promote healing for pressure ulcers include using devices that help elevate or float heels off of the bed to prevent pressure on the bottom of heels. Also, changing a resident ' s position every 2 hours helps keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drinking water was provided to the residents at the bedside for hydration. This was evident for 1(Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for hydration. The findings include: On 02/02/18/25 at 01:54 PM the surveyor observed Resident #5 sitting up in bed eating lunch. The resident pointed to a glass, half-filled glass with a brown liquid on his/her lunch tray. Resident #5 stated I cannot drink this it is too sweet; they do not give me water. The surveyor did not observe any water on the resident's lunch tray nor at the bedside. On 02/18/25 at 02:17 PM the surveyor interviewed the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) Staff #17 regarding the availability of water to Resident #5. The GNA stated that water is not put on meal trays because residents have water pitchers at the bedside. Water pitchers are filled by the night shift and placed at the residents' bedside daily. Further, Resident #5 did not have any water because his/her water pitcher was not delivered. On 02/18/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for residents by failing to 1) label oxygen administration equipment 2) put a physician oxygen order in place and 3) place signage outside the entrance of residents' room to indicate oxygen in use. This was evident for 3 (Resident #5, #18 and #42) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 2/18/25 at 9:07AM the surveyor observed Resident #5, lying in bed, receiving oxygen through a tubing attached to a humidification bottle and a concentrator. The oxygen tubing and humidification bottle were not labelled as to when they were put in use or when they should be replaced. Further, there was no signage on Resident #5's door or on the doorframe indicating that oxygen was in use. On 02 /19/25 at 8:54 AM a review of Resident #5's clinic record revealed diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Dementia. Also, a physician order dated 01/07/25 which stated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain medications were given consistent with the professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management during the recertification survey. The findings include: The medical abbreviation PRN stands for pro re nata, a Latin phrase that translates to as needed or as the situation arises. Oxycodone is a strong painkiller from a group of medicines called opiates, or narcotics used to treat moderate to severe pain. Pain parameters are the specific aspects of pain that are evaluated during an interview to understand a person's pain experience. On 2/20/25 at 3:58 PM, a record review of Resident #42's active and discontinued physician orders revealed that he/she was on PRN pain medications, however, the following orders did not specify the pain parameters: 1. Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 500 MG (Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. (Start date: 1/05/25) 2. Oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Oxycodone HCl)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and employee record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) perform review - 12 hour/year in-service were completed. This was found to be evident in 2 ( #24 and #25) out of 2 GNA employee files reviewed for required perform review - 12 hour/year in-service. The findings include: On 02/20/2025 at 07:30 AM the surveyor reviewed 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) employee files #24 and #25. During the review of the 2 employee files the surveyor discovered that the facility did not have current perform review - 12 hour/year in-service in the employee files for the 2 GNAs #24 and #25. At 08:30 AM on 02/20/2025 the surveyor interviewed the Director of Human Resources (HRD) #11. During the interview the surveyor informed the HRD #11 that the 2 GNAs #24 and #25 employee files did not contain any perform review - 12 hour/year in-service. The HRD #11 confirmed that the 2 GNA employee files #24 and #25 did not have current perform review - 12 hour/year in-service. The HRD #11 stated that there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and facility record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information contained all the required information. This was found to be evident on the posted staffing sheet on the nursing unit reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. The findings include: On 02/19/2025 at 2:10 PM the surveyor toured the nursing unit. The surveyor observed the daily staffing sheet posted on the nursing unit; however, the required information was not included on the staffing sheet. The staffing sheet included the facility name, the names of staff, the staff assignment, the date and shift. The posted staffing sheet did not include the Resident census, and the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed (Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses) nursing staff and unlicensed (Geriatric Nursing Assistants) nursing staff directly responsible for Resident care per shift. The surveyor on 02/19/2025 at 2:40 pm interviewed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #2 and asked GNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral health care services. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (Resident #45) out of 1 resident reviewed for behavioral health. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 02/18/25 at 12:56 PM, Resident #45 stated that he/she had a history of trauma. The Resident advised that the facility had not provided behavioral services for the history of trauma. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event — either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety and uncontrollable thoughts about the event. On 02/20/25 at 07:56 AM, a record review of Resident #45 ' s Social Service History & Initial assessment dated [DATE], stated that this resident is At risk for post-trauma syndrome AEB [as evidenced by] patient reported experienced or witnessed: natural disaster, serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the recommendations from the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) and conduct a monthly MRR. This was found evident for 1 (Resident #45) out of 1 resident, reviewed for Medication Regimen Review. The findings include: According to the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid, the definition of a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication. The review includes preventing, identifying, reporting, and resolving medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities, and collaborating with other members of the interdisciplinary team. Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) is a blood test for diabetes. This test measures your average blood glucose level over the past 3 months. It can be an important indicator for your doctor to see how well a resident is managing their diabetes. On 02/21/25 at approximately 11:15 AM, this surveyor conducted a record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate behavior monitoring for residents on psychotropic medications. This was evident for 1 (Resident #65) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification survey. The findings include: Abilify is an antipsychotic medication that helps treat several kinds of mental health condition. Lexapro is an antidepressant and is used to treat depression and anxiety. On 2/19/25 at 4:08 PM, a review of the active psychotropic medications of Resident #65 revealed the following: - Abilify Oral Tablet 2 MG (Aripiprazole) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for psychosis - Lexapro Oral Tablet 20 MG (Escitalopram Oxalate) Give 20 mg by mouth one time a day for depression Further review of Resident #65's medical record revealed a care plan to address the use of psychotropic medications with an intervention Discuss with my physician and family the ongoing need for use of medication. Review behaviors/interventions and alternate therapies attempted and their effectiveness as per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to screen and offer vaccinations to residents. This was evident for 3 (Residents #26, #51, #32) out of 5 residents screened for immunizations. The Findings include: During a medical record review on 2/20/25 at 2:43 PM it was discovered that Residents #26, #51, and #32 had no documentation of being screened for, offered, receiving, or refusing a pneumonia vaccine. During a facility policy review of the Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) on 2/20/25 at 3:38 PM it was discovered that Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission and Each resident will be offered a pneumococcal immunization unless it is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 4:40 PM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) agreed the pneumonia vaccines should be offered and administered as appropriate to the residents. She doesn't know why residents #26, #51, and #32 were not offered pneumonia vaccinations. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 5:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and employee record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required in-service training for Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) was completed. This was found to be evident in 5 (#24, 25, 26, 27 and #30) out of 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) employee files reviewed for required in-service training. The findings include: On 02/20/2025 at 07:30 AM the surveyor reviewed 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) employee files #24, 25, 26, 27 and #30. During the record review of the 5 GNA employee files the surveyor discovered that the facility had incomplete documentation of the required in-service training for all 5 of the Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) #24, 25, 26, 27 and #30. At 08:30 AM on 02/20/2025 the surveyor interviewed the Director of Human Resources (HRD) #11. During this interview the surveyor conveyed to the HRD #11 that the employee files had incomplete documentation of the required in-service training for the 5 GNAs #24, 25, 26, 27 and #30. The Director of Human Resources #11 confirmed that there was incomplete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility investigations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain documentation that alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for residents (#9, #18, #30, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, and #264) This was evident for 11 of 40 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The purpose of a thorough investigation is first to determine if abuse of the resident has occurred. It is the expectation that any allegation of abuse or injury of unknown occurrence being investigated by the facility and be reported to the appropriate agency within 24 hours and the conclusion of the investigation to be reported within 5 days to the appropriate agency (OHCQ) and the Office of Aging (Ombudsman). The facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse by a resident. 1. Review of the Facility Reported incident MD00134776 for Resident #62 on 8/18/22 at 4:50 pm revealed on 12/21/18 at 7:30 am Resident #62 reported to RN (Registered Nurse) #30 that GNA (Geriatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to have the most recent survey results in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. This has the potential to affect all the residents and visitors within the facility. The findings include: On 08/15/22 at 10:50 AM, during the Resident Council meeting all seven residents who attended the meeting reported they did not know where the previous survey results were located. On 08/17/22 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor made the Director of Nursing #2 aware during the resident council meeting the residents stated they did not know where the survey results were located. The surveyor asked DON #2 where the survey binder was located. Staff #16 took the surveyor to the Chesapeake Dining Hall; the surveyor observed the survey binder behind the door in the dining hall. On 08/17/22 at 11:48 AM the surveyor spoke with Administrator #1 about the residents not having access to the survey results. Administrator #1 reported the survey binder should have been on the table in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician when a resident refused to wear a medical device for at least a month. This was evident in 1 of 2 resident (Resident #12) records reviewed for treatment plans. The findings include: On 08/15/22 at 10:14 AM a review of Resident #12's treatment administration record (TAR) revealed that on 05/16/22 at 23:00 (11 PM), the resident was ordered to wear a sling to the right right arm at all times; the order was discontinued on 08/09/22 at 12:52 AM. The TAR legend indicated to see nurse note for several entries on the 7 am - 3 pm shift on 8/2/22, 8/3/22, 8/6/22, and 8/7/22, in which the nurses documented the resident refused to wear the sling. Per TAR and nursing notes, the resident refused to wear the sling on 8/5/22 (7 am-3 pm) and 8/6/22, 8/7/22 during the 11 pm-7 am shift. On 8/9/22 at 12:52 AM, Staff #28 was made aware the resident was refusing to wear the sling and the order was discontinued. Further review of the TAR in July 2022 revealed the nurses documented the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely report a violation of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property to the state authority. This was evident for 3 of 14 residents (Resident #15, #30, #7) investigated for reportable incidents. Findings include: 1. On 8/19/22 at 1:12 PM, review of a facility self-report of an allegation of neglect involving Resident #15 the date of the self-report revealed that the facility reported the incident to the state authority on 8/15/22. The incident of alleged neglect occurred on 8/13/22 at approximately 4:00 PM. On 8/19/22 at 2:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Administrator regarding the time the alleged neglect incident was reported to the state authority. The Administrator confirmed that the alleged neglect incident was reported after the required 24 hour reporting time as noted on the report form. 2. On 08/12/22 at 2:38 PM, the surveyor reviewed MD00157914 which revealed that on 09/05/20 Resident #30 was discovered to have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to complete a notice before transfer before a resident was transferred to the emergency room. This was evident in 2 of 4 residents (Resident #12 and #15) reviewed for transfer documentation. The findings include: 1. On 08/15/22 at 10:50 am a review of Resident #12's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was transferred to a local hospital in May 2022 for further medical evaluation. While reviewing the EMR the surveyor noticed the transfer notice was not in the medical record. On 08/18/22 at 11:45 am during an interview, the Administrator #1 made the surveyor aware a transfer notice was not done because the resident was gone for less than 24 hours.2. On 8/15/22 at 11:00 am, review of Resident #15's medical record revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Further review of Resident #15's medical record revealed that the resident had two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to verify a weight reading resulting in an inaccurate weight loss calculation which led to an inaccurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident in 1 (Resident #42) of 7 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a tool for implementing standardized assessments and for facilitating care management in nursing homes and non-critical access hospital swing beds. The assessment is completed upon admission, annually, quarterly, during a significant change, and when a resident is discharged . On 08/16/22 at 12:44 pm, a review of Resident #42's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident had a significant weight loss of 10% or greater in 6 months. On 12/01/21 the resident weighed 105.8 pounds. On 06/07/22 the resident weighed 94.1 pounds which is an 11.06 % weight loss. A review of Resident #42's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section J Nutrition item K0300 Weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined facility staff failed to develop and then provide residents and/or their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This was evident for 2 (Resident #43, #45) of 2 residents reviewed during a annual survey for baseline care plan. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of Resident #43's electronic and paper medical record on 8/15/22 at 8:00 AM revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in 06/2022. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission and that a copy was provided to the resident/resident representative. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 8/16/22 at 10:04 AM and confirmed that facility staff failed to initiate a baseline care plan for Resident #43 within 48 hours of admission. The DON stated, Baseline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1.) initiate a care plan for a resident receiving a hypnotic and an antidepressant medication (Resident #43); 2.) failed to initiate care plans for activities (Resident #56 and #52); 3. initiate a care plan for a new treatment for Resident #12; 4.) to initiate a care plan for vision loss (Resident #52). This was evident for 4 out of 8 residents (Resident #12, #43, #52, and #56) selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: A Care Plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. The facility failed to initiate a care plan for a Resident (#43) who was receiving melatonin and Trazadone for insomnia. A review of the medical records on 8/18/21 at 11:00 am, revealed that Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 for long-term care and with a diagnosis that included insomnia. A review of Resident # 43's medical record on 8/18/22 am revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan after a change in status. This was evident in 2 of 40 residents (Residents #5 and #63) reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 8/19/22 at 10:10 am, review of Resident #5's medical record revealed that the resident was receiving tube feedings and eating by mouth. Further review of the medical record on 8/19/22 at 10:15 am revealed that the facility Dietitian #29 documented on 5/24/22 that Resident #5 was asked if he/she wanted to continue with tube feeding. Resident #5 stated that he/she did not want to make changes to the tube feeding plan at that time because he/she liked the option of being able to have both options of receiving nutrition. On 8/19/22 at 10:30 am, review of Resident #5's care plan found no evidence that interventions were being made to ask the resident about his/her preference for tube feeding continuation. On 8/19/22 at 11:10 am, interview with Dietitian #29 revealed that he/she is responsible for updating Resident #5's nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to administer a bowel protocol as ordered by the physician (Resident #216) and failed to follow-up on nutritional supplements for Resident #24. This was evident for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for nutrition services during the annual survey. The findings include: A fleets enema is a saline laxative that provides relief from occasional constipation. 1. Review of complaint MD00180330 and Resident # 216's medical record on 8/19/22 at 1:17 pm revealed a physician order dated 3/9/20 to administer 8 ounces of prune juice by mouth or by g-tube every 24 hours as needed for day one of bowel protocol and if no bowel movement (BM) by day 3 and to administer a fleets enema for day 3 of no BM. Review of the BM report on 8/19/22 at 1:30 pm, revealed the resident did not have a BM on 7/4/22, 7/5/22, 7/6/22 and the prune juice and/or the Fleets Enema was not given. During an Interview with the DON on 8/19/22 at 2pm she confirmed the bowel protocol put in place for Resident #216 was not followed. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's tube feeding program (Resident #5). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents being investigated for tube feeding during the annual survey. Findings include: On 8/19/22 at 10:10 am, review of Resident #5's medical record revealed that the resident was receiving tube feedings and eating by mouth. Further review of the medical record on 8/19/22 at 10:15 am revealed that the facility Dietitian #29 documented on 5/24/22 that Resident #5 was asked if he/she wanted to continue with tube feeding. Resident #5 stated that he/she did not want to make changes to the tube feeding plan at that time because he/she liked the option of being able to have both options of receiving nutrition. On 8/19/22 at 10:30 am, review of Resident #5's care plan found no evidence that interventions were being made to ask the resident about his/her preference for tube feeding continuation. On 8/19/22 at 11:10 am, interview with Dietitian #29 revealed that it was normal practice to ask Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow up with the consultant pharmacist's recommendations for a resident. This was evident in 1 (Resident #52) of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings are: On 08/16/22 at 12:35 pm, the surveyor reviewed copies of Resident #52's pharmacy recommendations for May and July 2022. The pharmacy recommendation for July 2022 was for the resident to have a Ferritin level, TSAT, and Occult blood and/or add iron supplementation. On 07/21/22 Nurse Practitioner #28 agreed to the pharmacy recommendation and added if not done in the last 6 months to do Iron/blood saturation. A review of Resident #52's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an order was not written for the recommended blood work and the iron supplement. On 08/18/22 at 3:03 pm during an interview with Nurse Practitioner (NP) #28 about the pharmacy recommendations for Resident #52 in July 2022, NP #28 verified, that an order was not written for blood work and/or an iron supplement.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in resident's drug regimen to the physician, facility's medical director and/or the director of nursing. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 on 8/18/22 at 11 am revealed a physician order dated 6/30/22 to administer Melatonin 6 mg (milligrams) and Trazadone 50 mg at bedtime for insomnia. Melatonin is a hormone released by the pineal gland in the brain at night and has been associated with control of the sleep-wake cycle. Trazadone is an antidepressant and a sedative. Pharmacy reviews dated 7/18/22, 8/16/22 documented that no irregularities were noted. During interview with the pharmacist on 8/18/22 at 1 pm, he stated the resident had a diagnosis for depression; however, he should have brought the duplicate medications of Melatonin and Trazadone to the attention of the facility staff.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility's dietary staff failed to wear hair restraints while in the kitchen to prevent hair from contacting food. This was evident in 2 (Staff #5 and Staff #9) of 5 dietary staff observed in the kitchen during the annual survey. The findings include: On 08/12/22 at 8:55 am surveyor observed Staff #5 in the kitchen without a hair covering. The employee reported he/she usually had his/her hair tied up. On 08/12/22 at 1:05 pm the surveyor observed Staff #9 in the kitchen without a hair covering. The employee verbalized he/she just came to work, and he/she has been working at the facility for 4-5 years. On 08/12/22 at 9:03 am Staff #30 made the surveyor aware the facility was trying to find a suitable hair covering for Staff #5. He/she wears a hairnet according to his/her hairstyle and the staff are required to wear a hair covering.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to adhere to infection control practices and guidelines by ensuring that the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn before entering a resident room who was noted to be on transmission-based precautions (TBP). This was found to be evident during multiple observations made of 2 residents (Resident #164 and #165) during the facility's annual Medicare/ Medicaid survey. Findings include: Transmission-Based Precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used in addition to Standard Precautions for patients who may be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission. On 8/11/22 at approximately 9:15 AM Staff #10 was observed going into Resident #164 and Resident #165's room. Staff #10 crossed the entrance of the resident room and did not have on a gown, gloves, or eye protection. At this time this surveyor asked Staff #10 if she was aware of the sign that was posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-05-08 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make the results of the most recent survey readily available and accessible to residents and visitors. This was evident for the facility's survey results binder.The findings include:On 05/04/2026 at 7:55 AM, the survey team observed the survey results binder located in the conference room. The conference room was down a hallway past several administrative offices and through a metal door and not readily accessible to visitors. Multiple observations were made by the survey team from 05/04/2026 through 05/07/2026. At no time during these observations was the survey results binder observed to be readily accessible to residents or visitors, and no sign was posted indicating the binder's location or availability.On 05/06/2026 at 8:52 AM, the surveyor was unable to locate the survey results binder in the front lobby area.On 05/07/2026 at 12:11 PM, the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) for the survey results binder. The DON went to the fireplace mantel in the visitor lounge and stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Decatur Health & Rehab CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5Falkville Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterFalkville, AL 1 of 5Holston Rehabilitation And Care CenterKingsport, TN 1 of 5Regency House Of AlexandriaAlexandria, LA 1 of 5Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHuntsville, AL 1 of 5Smithfield Manor Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenSmithfield, NC 2 of 5Canterbury Health Care FacilityPhenix City, AL 2 of 5Cullman Health Care CenterCullman, AL 2 of 5Delaware Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGeorgetown, DE 2 of 5Essex Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterLouisville, KY 2 of 5Five Oaks Rehabilitation and Care CenterConcord, NC 2 of 5Lynwood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMobile, AL 2 of 5Oak Haven Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterCenter Point, LA 2 of 5Tri Cities Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterCumberland, KY 3 of 5Aiken Rehabilitation and Care CenterAiken, SC 3 of 5Brookshire Healthcare CenterHuntsville, AL 3 of 5Forest Manor Health And RehabNorthport, AL 3 of 5Northside Health CareGadsden, AL 3 of 5Rivers Edge Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProspect, KY 3 of 5The Columns Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterJonesville, LA 4 of 5Folsom Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCullman, AL 4 of 5Woodland Village Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenCullman, AL 5 of 5Adams Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexander City, AL 5 of 5Haleyville Health Care CenterHaleyville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHESAPEAKE SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2024
CH CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
CW CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
CZH CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
GEFEN CHESAPEAKE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
JS CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
MB CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
MOSES STRAUSS FAMILY 2022 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
MS CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
SS CHESAPEAKE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
SUSAN STRAUSS FAMILY 2022 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
BERKOWITZ, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
JOSEPHSON, ELIYOHUIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2024
JOSEPHSON, LEEYAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/17/2025
SNOW HILL SNF REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2025
CHESAPEAKE OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2025
VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2025
JOHNSON, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
NWOGBO, FELIXIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
STRAUSS, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
STRAUSS, MOSESIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
CHESAPEAKE REALTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
GEFEN INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2025
OAKWOOD INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/17/2025
APFEL, STEPHENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
APFEL, SYDNEYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
HERZKA, CHAIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
STRULOVICS, JOELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
WOLOFSKY, CHAVAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 51 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$341K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 22%Other / private 11%

This home reported $341K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,065per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215121. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next