The Columns Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 91.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility census was 93. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 04/21/2026 at 8:46 a.m. titled, Sanitation Inspection revealed the following in part.It is the policy of this facility, as part of the department's sanitation program, to conduct inspections to ensure food service areas are clean, sanitary and in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. Review of an undated facility policy on 04/20/2026 at 2:50 p.m. titled, Date Marking for Food Safety revealed the following part .The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready -to-eat, time/temperature control for safety of food. 2. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. 3. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for date marking the food at the time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving a psychotropic medications had a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) completed for 1 resident (Resident #26) of 5 (#8, #13, #26, #40, #87) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Gradual Dose Reduction of Psychotropic Drugs, revealed in part, Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to be managed at a lower dose or to discontinue these drugs. Review of Resident #26's medical records revealed an admit date of 06/16/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: Parkinson's Disease With Dyskinesia, With Fluctuations, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified, Alzheimer's Disease, Delusional Disorders, Depression, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #26's Physician's Orders revealed in part the following orders:Haloperidol Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligrams), Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to Alzheimer's Disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman in writing of resident transfer/discharge for 1 (Resident #96) of 1 resident reviewed for transfer/discharge. The total sample size was 30.Findings:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (Including AMA) read in part. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and resident's representative in a language and a manner in which they can understand. The notice will include all of the following at the time it is provided: h. the name, address (mailing and email), and phone number of the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.Review of Resident #96's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/04/2026 and a discharge date of 03/04/2026. Resident #96 had diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side. Review of Resident #96's Discharge-Return…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide care and services that meet professional standards of quality, by failing to accurately assess 1 resident (Resident #87). The total sample size was 30 residents.Findings:Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/2025 with diagnoses that included in part. Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset, Atrial Fibrillation, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #87's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/22/2026 revealed in part a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #87's physician orders revealed in part.Eliquis (an anticoagulant or blood thinner) Oral Tablet 2.5 MG (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth every morning and at bedtime related to Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation with a start date of 08/22/2025.Monitor side effects of anticoagulant therapy.0 - .6 - Abnormal bruising, with a start date of 08/22/2025.An additional order for Weekly Skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection. The sample size was 30. The facility failed to ensure: Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and utilized for Resident #10; andProper hand hygiene and gloving were performed throughout Resident #10's wound care treatment.Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 04/21/2026 at 4:22 p.m. titled, Clean Dressing Change revealed the following in part .It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross contamination. Physician's orders will specify the type of dressing and frequency of changes. 9. Loosen the tape and remove the exiting dressing. 10. Remove gloves, pulling inside out over the dressing. Discard into appropriate receptacle. 11. Wash hands and put on clean gloves. 12. Cleanse the wound as ordered. Pat dry with gauze. 14. Wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was developed, implemented, and/or maintained in an effective and comprehensive manner for falls. The facility failed to provide documentation of evidence of its ongoing facility QAPI program. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 85 residents residing in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), with a revision date of 04/28/2025 revealed in part.It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and addresses all the care and unique services the facility provides.Definitions: Quality Assurances and Performance Improvement (QAPI) refers to the coordinated application of two mutually reinforcing aspects of a quality management system: (QA) and Performance Improvement (PI). QAPI takes a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Nursing carts were free of loose pills for 1 (Cart A) of 2 (Cart A and Cart B) carts reviewed, and 2. Nursing carts were free of expired supplies for 1 (Cart B) of 2 (Cart A and Cart B) carts reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration revised on 09/01/2024 revealed, in part .the facility must provide safe and effective storage of all drugs and biologicals consistent with professional standards of practice. Staff should remove any expired medications from active stock and discard according to facility policy. Interview with S19 CQI on 05/14/2025 at 12:23 p.m. confirmed the facility's policy entitled Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration was used for all medications in the facility, not just refrigerated medications. Observation of Cart A on 05/13/2025 at 1:45 p.m., with oversight from S9 LPN, revealed 2 unidentified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received reasonable accommodation of needs by failing to ensure the call light was accessible by a resident for 1 (Resident #51) of 26 sampled residents. Findings: On 05/14/2025, review of facility policy titled, Answering Call Lights, with effective date of 06/01/2023 and revision Date of 9/28/2025, revealed in part . Purpose: Call lights are to serve as notice to the staff that the resident has a need or request. Prompt answering of call lights provides a sense of security to the resident . Process: Place call light within reach of the resident before leaving the room and anticipate other needs of the resident . Resident #51 Review of Resident #51's electronic medical record revealed an admit date of 02/16/2024 with diagnosis that included: Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies, Major Depressive Disorder, Altered Mental Status, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Aphasia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Hallucinations, unspecified, unsteadiness on feet, and history of repeated falls. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform each resident of the charges for services for which the residents may be responsible for paying for 2 (#45 and #70) of 2 (#45 and #70) sampled residents who received Advanced Beneficiary Notices of Non-Coverage (ABN). Findings: Review of the ABN notices (Form CMS-10055) signed by Resident #45 on 02/17/2025 and Resident #70 on 03/19/2025 revealed the estimated cost for continuing daily skilled nursing care was not completed but left blank. In an interview on 05/14/2025 at 12:10 p.m., S5 Accounts Manager confirmed she was responsible for completing the ABN forms and having them signed by the resident or representative. During a review of the Form CMS-10055 for Residents #45 and #70 at that time, S5 Accounts Manager confirmed the estimate of the cost of services amount per day was not completed. S5 Accounts Manager stated she would have to get that information from the Corporate Office and only does so if the resident or resident representative specifically requests it. S5 Accounts Manager confirmed she did not obtain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a clinical rationale for a denial of a dose reduction for 2 (#37 and #51) of 5 (#24, #37, #45, #50, and #51) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure the physician documented on the Pharmaceutical Consultant Report a clinical rationale for not reducing psychoactive medications recommended for gradual dose reduction. Findings: Review of the facility policy on 05/13/2025 at 11:29 a.m., titled Gradual Dose Reduction of Psychotropic Drugs with a revision date of 09/01/2024 revealed in part .Policy: Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. 6. For any individual who is receiving a psychotropic medication to treat expressions or indications of distress related to dementia, the GDR may be considered clinically contraindicated for reasons that include, but that are not limited to: The physician has documented the clinical rationale…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $634K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA