Holston Rehabilitation And Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 204 beds and averages 149.3 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment that was as free of accident hazards as possible and provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 (Resident #166) residents reviewed for falls. Resident #166 had an unwitnessed fall, nursing staff failed to report the fall to the physician resulting in a 9-day delay in evaluation and Resident #166 was later diagnosed with a left hip fracture. The facility's failure resulted in actual Harm for Resident #166.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in Condition of Residents, dated 1/22/2024, revealed .notification of the physician, legal representative/family member should occur promptly when there is a change in condition .defined .an accident .which results in injury and has potential for physician intervention .accident or incidents resulting in suspected injury . Review of the medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and garbage and refuse were properly contained in 3 of 3 dumpsters.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated 9/1/2024, revealed .Garbage and refuse .Surrounding area shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris and insect/ rodent attractions are minimized .receptacles for refuse shall be maintained in good repair .During an observation with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 9/22/2025 at 11:50 AM, revealed the following: The 3 of 3 dumpsters were observed with the doors open. Around the dumpster area the following items were observed broken or in disrepair: 2 bed frames, 4 nightstands, 1 end table, 1 office chair, 1 toilet, 1 wheelchair, and 1 file rack. Continued observation revealed various garbage debris scattered on the outer right edge of the dumpster area. The CDM stated the broken items had been around the dumpster area for more than 2 weeks and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was donned for 2 residents (Resident # 25 and #37) of 25 residents observed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and the facility failed to wear face coverings during a COVID-19 outbreak on 5 of 5 hallways of 1 of 2 shifts.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Management Manual, effective 3/21/2024, revealed .implement Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of multidrug resistant organisms .all staff receive training on enhanced barrier precautions upon hire and annually .training in high risk activities .are expected to comply with all precautions .an order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for .wounds .even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized .PPE for enhanced barrier precautions .necessary when performing high contact care .activities include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, personal file review, and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's rights to be free from misappropriation and/or exploitation when money totaling $23.11 was taken from 1 resident (Resident #43) of 22 residents reviewed for misappropriation. The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source, Exploitation, undated, revealed .Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hereditary and Idiopathic Neuropathy, Respiratory Disorders, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #43…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of medical record, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) timely after a new mental health diagnosis was added for 1 resident (Resident #10) of 8 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Program, undated, revealed .All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders .ends the PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later.Review of a PASARR Level 1 screen for Resident #10 dated 8/12/2025, revealed the resident had .no mental health diagnosis known or suspected.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Encephalopathy, Diabetes, and Intraspinal Abscess and Granuloma. Continued review revealed the resident received a new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to blood glucose checks for 1 resident (Resident #109) and falls for 2 residents (Resident #138 and #166) of 25 residents reviewed for care plans.The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 12/31/2024, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing.needs.and.services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality.The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum.The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 residents (Resident #25 and Resident #100) of 25 residents reviewed for care plans.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 12/31/2024, revealed .policy of this facility to develop .implement .person-centered care plan for each resident .Individualized interventions for trauma survivors .care plan will be reviewed and revised . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Muscle Wasting, and Orthopedic Aftercare. Review of the Physician Orders for Resident #25 dated 4/13/2025, revealed .enhanced barrier precautions for wound . Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #24 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of medical records, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the Physician's Orders for blood glucose monitoring for 1 resident (Resident #109) of 5 residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated 1/1/2025, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to perform blood glucose monitoring to diabetic residents as per physician's orders .The facility will perform blood glucose monitoring as per physician's orders .Verify the physician's order .Document the procedure .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Polyneuropathy, Osteomyelitis of Right Ankle and Foot, Diabetes, and Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb.Review of the Physician's Orders dated 7/23/2025, revealed Resident #109 had an order for accuchecks (blood glucose (sugar) monitoring) daily and as needed (PRN).Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of the medical record, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen therapy for 1 resident (Resident #56) of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy and failed to document CPAP/BIPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) (machine that provides continuous positive airway pressure device used to keep the airway open during sleep], BIPAP [machine that provides bi-level positive airway pressure to keep the airway open during sleep) care for 1 resident (Resident #72) of 8 residents reviewed for CPAP/BIPAP. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 9/1/2024, revealed .Oxygen is administered to resident who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice.Oxygen therapy.is the administration of oxygen at concentrations greater than that in ambient air.with the intent of treating or preventing the symptoms and manifestations of hypoxia.Hypoxia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain sanitary kitchen equipment which had the potential to effect 120 of the 122 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Cleaning and Sanitizing Dietary Areas and Equipment, showed .All kitchen areas and equipment shall be maintained in a sanitary manner and be free of build-up of food, grease, or other soil . During the initial kitchen observation on 3/3/2024 at 10:55 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), showed the facility's gas stove griddle had a layer of dried brownish-black food debris observed on the top and the right-side lip of the metal splashguard of the griddle. During an interview on 3/3/2024 at 11:12 AM, the CDM confirmed she was responsible for the oversight of the dietary department. The CDM stated the kitchen equipment was cleaned daily and deep cleaned weekly. The CDM confirmed the stove griddle was in an unsanitary condition and could use further cleaning.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical information was not visible for 3 residents (#1, #27, and #31) of 122 residents observed and failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #47) was assisted to the smoking area of 7 residents reviewed for smoking. The findings include: Based on the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Dignity, showed .It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity .All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights .Maintain resident privacy . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Rights, showed .The resident has a right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs . Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Depression, Dementia, Atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-11-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $711K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN