Rosewood Health Facility
1401 New Stine Road, Bakersfield, CA 93309 · Non profit - Corporation · 79 certified beds · (661) 834-0620 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.91 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.4%CMS range 55.3–68.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.7–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.8–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 65.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.00 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary team (IDT- a group of professionals from different fields in the nursing facility that work together to address a patient's needs) met to discuss if one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was high risk for falls (move downward, typically rapidly and freely without control from a higher to a lower level), had a history of falls, and had a diagnosis of Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), was safe to have one-on-one monitoring (1:1- a type of care where a healthcare professional provides constant supervision to a resident) discontinued. After discontinuing the 1:1 monitoring the facility failed to conduct a fall risk assessment (medical evaluation used to determine how likely a resident is to fall), update the care plan (CP- a document that outlines a resident's needs, treatment, and expected outcomes) to include updated interventions, and provide adequate supervision. These failures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failure resulted in ineffective infection surveillance (continuous method to collect, analyze, monitor and reduce infections) and antibiotic stewardship program (a program to monitor the use of antibiotics - medications used to treat infections in healthcare settings) and had the potential to increase the spread of infectious diseases to residents, staff, and visitors.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/11/26 at 9:13 a.m. with IP, IP's training record was reviewed. IP stated she had not completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. IP stated she started to work as a full-time IP (40 hours per week) at the end of October 2025. IP stated she does not hold any other role in the facility.During a review of the facility's Job Description - Infection Preventionist dated 7/8/20, the Job Description - Infection Preventionist indicated, Requirements: Specialty training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for two of three sampled residents (Resident 24 and Resident 29). This failure resulted in Resident 24 and Resident 29 waiting up to one hour for staff to respond to their needs. Findings: During a group interview on 2/10/26 at 9:58 a.m. with Resident 24, Resident 24 stated, Regarding the call light system, staff is responding within five minutes, turning off the call light, and then tells us they [staff] will be back but never returns. During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - comprehensive assessment tool), dated 12/23/25, the MDS indicated Resident 24 had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS - Cognitive assessment) score of 15 (score of 13 to 15 indicates cognitively intact). During a group interview on 2/10/26 at 10 a.m. with Resident 29, Resident 29 stated, I timed them [staff] and have waited an hour. One time, I waited so long and I had a soiled diaper. Resident 29 stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Obtaining a Fingerstick [using a small needle (lancet) to draw a few drops of blood from the fingertip for immediate analysis] Glucose [sugar that is the body's main energy source] Level for 15 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 16, Resident 5, Resident 75, Resident 83, Resident 60, Resident 35, Resident 47, Resident 53, Resident 87, Resident 81, Resident 57, Resident 88, Resident 4, Resident 1, and Resident 73). This failure resulted in nursing staff conducting procedures on residents without a physician's order.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/26 at 8:46 a.m. with Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool) Coordinator (MDSC) and Assistant MDSC (AMDSC), MDSC stated 15 facility residents received insulin (treatment to regulate blood sugar). Physician Order (PO) for insulin for Resident 16, Resident 5, Resident 75, Resident 83, Resident 60, Resident 35, Resident 47, Resident 53, Resident 87, Resident 81, Resident 88, Resident 4, Resident 1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention practices when: Three of three clean laundry bins had dirt-like debris at the bottom. This failure had the potential for contaminating clean laundry and spread of infectious diseases to the residents. Three of three personal laundry transport carts had thick dust-like debris along the bottom frame of the cart. This failure had the potential for contaminating personal laundry and spread of infection and diseases to the residents. The facility did not follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Surveillance of Infections. This failure had the potential for unidentified increase and spread of infectious diseases to the residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/26 at 8:52 a.m. with Laundry Aide (LA) 1, in the laundry room, there were three clean laundry bins in front of the three dryers. The three clean laundry bins had dirt-like debris at the bottom with pieces of material. LA 1 stated she had not gotten to clean them. 2. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program (a program to monitor the use of antibiotics - medications used to treat infections in healthcare settings) for four of five sampled residents (Resident 26, Resident 4, Resident 3, and Resident 24). This failure had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary antibiotics and to place them at risk for adverse health outcomes. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/11/26 at 9:52 a.m., with Infection Preventionist (IP), the facility's Infection Control Prevention & Control Surveillance (ICPCS), dated 12/2025 was reviewed. The ICPCS indicated:a) On 12/5/25 to 12/12/25, Resident 26 had an order of Macrobid (antibiotic medication for bladder infection) 100 mg (milligram) PO (by mouth) BID (twice a day) x (times) 7 days for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection - bladder infection). There was no documentation of signs/symptoms and organism on culture (this test identifies the specific organism causing the illness, allowing for targeted antibiotic or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three laundry dryer filters were free of thick lint build up. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of a fire affecting residents' safety. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/26 at 8:38 a.m. with Laundry Aide (LA) 1, in the laundry room, there were two dryers not in use. There was thick lint build up in each of the dryer's filters. LA 1 stated she has not gotten to clean it. During an interview on 2/12/26 at 11:23 a.m. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS), HS stated, Honestly Monday [three days ago] was the last time I saw them cleaning the filter around 8:45 a.m. and 9 a.m. I don't go in there and clean the filter. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) tilted, Cleaning Washers and Dryers, dated 11/14/23, the P&P indicated, Procedure to Clean the Outside: d. At the end of each shift, clean the filter and filter area. e. Check the burner area for lint build up. f. Wipe all areas that are easily accessible.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine daily self-care tasks to maintain basic physical health, hygiene, and independence) was provided to one of two sampled dependent residents (Resident 53). This failure resulted in Resident 53 being embarrassed due to not receiving assistance with her toileting needs and had the potential for her current level of bowel continence to decrease.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/26 at 2:58 p.m. with Resident 53, in her room, Resident 53 sat in her wheelchair. Resident 53 stated could not use of her left side because she had a stroke. Resident 53 stated she still can feel the sensation of having to have a bowel movement (BM), but she needed assistance from the staff to get into the bathroom. Resident 53 stated if the staff do not respond to her call for assistance, she will have to have a BM in her brief. Resident 53 stated yesterday she pressed her call light for assistance to go to the bathroom to have a BM, a staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine daily self-care tasks to maintain basic physical health, hygiene, and independence) was provided to one of two sampled dependent residents (Resident 53). This failure had the potential for Resident 53's current level of bowel continence to decrease.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/26 at 2:58 p.m. with Resident 53, in her room, Resident 53 sat in her wheelchair. Resident 53 stated could not use the left side of her body because she had a stroke (lack of blood flow to the brain leading to sudden loss of function). Resident 53 stated she can still feel the sensation of having to have a bowel movement (BM), but she needed assistance from the staff to get into the bathroom. Resident 53 stated if the staff do not respond to her call for assistance, she will have to have a BM in her brief. Resident 53 stated yesterday she pressed her call light for assistance to go to the bathroom to have a BM, a staff member answered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI - a program that monitors quality of care at the facility and addresses system deficits) committee failed to monitor and evaluate infection prevention and control performance data for two of 12 months (August and September) in 2025. This failure placed facility residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/26 at 11 a.m. with Administrator, the facility's QAPI records were reviewed. Administrator stated the QAPI committee met quarterly and in 2025 met on 1/31/25, 4/23/25, 7/30/25, and 10/17/25. Administrator stated each QAPI meeting reviewed quality indicators (measures of facility performance) data going back three months. Administrator stated the 10/17/25 meeting reviewed quality indicators data from August, September and October 2025. Administrator provided the records of the 10/17/25 meeting which included the Infection Control Rounds (ICR) spreadsheet for August, September and October 2025. The ICR spreadsheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a noncompliance care plan (CP- documents the resident's needs based on an identified problem, documents interventions necessary to be implemented by the whole healthcare team to meet the established goal) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) identified as a high risk for developing pressure injuries (PI-is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence). This failure resulted in Resident 1 developing an unstageable pressure injury (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss. Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the PI cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough [yellow or white material consisting of dead cells which attaches to the wound bed] or eschar [dead tissue that forms over healthy skin]. If slough or eschar is removed, a Stage 3 [Full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible] or Stage 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay in care and had the potential for negative medical outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/24 at 2:35 p.m. with Resident 1 in the hallway, Resident 1 was observed with a large area of raised reddened scaly appearing skin from the bottom of her left side of neck stretching toward her left shoulder approximately 6 inches in length and width. Resident 1 was observed scratching at this reddened area as well as picking and scratching at her face. Resident 1 was confused to time and place. Resident 1 could not answer questions appropriately. During an interview on 12/3/24 at 2:40 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated she was assigned to Resident 1. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 is alert but confused. LVN 1 stated she did not know what the cause of the scaly redness was on Resident 1 ' s bottom of left side of neck toward her left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Water Management Program for 71 of 71 sampled resident's when the facility cooling tower (device that removes heat from water and used to cool a building) tested positive for Legionella (bacteria causing lung infection). This failure had the potential to spread a highly contagious, infectious bacteria to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:30 a.m. with Safety Officer (SO), SO stated the cooler connected to the water tower tested positive for Legionella and the water treatment company treated the water. SO stated he got the report on October 16th and he notified the facility Administrator, Infection Preventionist (IP), and Director of Operations (DO). During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:35 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the staff had not been in-serviced on Legionella or legionella pneumonia. During an interview on 11/6/24 at 12:26 p.m. with Field…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20). This failure resulted in Resident 20 developing Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD- caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture). Findings: During an observation on 11/4/24 at 10:42 a.m. two staff members repositioned Resident 20. Resident 20 was non-verbal. During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated diagnoses including, weakness or the inability to move on the left side of her body, severe loss of strength on the left side of her body, inability to talk, and obesity. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/6/24 at 11:06 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 20's Care Plan (CP), revision date of 9/27/24, was reviewed. The CP indicated two staff were to reposition Resident 20 at least once a shift and as necessary. DON stated dependent residents are turned every two hours and as needed. DON stated Resident 20's CP should have been updated to turn every two hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Catheter Care, Urinary, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 49) when timely nursing assessment and interventions were not provided when Resident 49 complained of pain. This failure resulted in Resident 49 experiencing discomfort. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 9:43 a.m. with Resident 49, in his room, a catheter (flexible tube that continually drains and empties urine from the bladder into a collection bag outside the body) urine collection bag was seen suspended from the left side of his bed. Resident 49 stated he had the catheter because he had a lot of kidney stones (small, hard deposits that form in the kidneys and are often painful when passed) and a lot of sediment (the material from a liquid that settles to the bottom) drained from his urine. During an interview on 11/5/24 at 9:56 a.m. with Resident 49, he stated he was having pain from his catheter, and he made his nurse aware of the discomfort. Resident 49…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Labeling and Storage for two of 32 sampled residents (Resident 219, Resident 58) and two of two medication carts when: 1. Medications were at the bedside for two of 32 sampled residents (Resident 219, Resident 58). This failure had the potential for medication to be accessed by unauthorized staff and residents. 2. Four of 14 insulin (medication to lower sugar levels in the blood) vials were expired on two of two sampled medication carts. This failure had the potential to result in a loss of medication potency (strength), inaccurate test results, and adversely affect the residents' health. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:52 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in Resident 219's room, Resident 219 had Calazinc (helps protect and relieve minor skin irritation due to rashes) on the bedside table. LVN 2 stated medication should not be at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Resident Informed Consent for the use of Psychotherapeutic [medication to treat mental disorders] Drugs, for two of six sampled residents (Resident 48 and Resident 217) when their informed consents were not complete. This failure had the potential for Resident 48 and Resident 217 to receive psychotropic medication without knowing the risks and benefits of the medication. Findings: During an interview on 11/6/24 at 2:06 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 stated the doctor was responsible for getting the informed consent and the nurse was the one who witnessed the resident's signature. During a review of Resident 48's Physician Orders (PO) dated 5/16/23, the PO indicated, Temazepam (used to treat inability to sleep) 15 mg capsule, 1 capsule through the feeding tube (tube inserted into stomach for nutritional and medication needs) one time daily. During a review of Resident 48's Informed Consent (IC) dated 5/19/23, the IC indicated This documentation is to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medication was available for one of six sampled residents (Resident 217). This failure resulted in Resident 217's pain not being controlled as evidenced by Resident 217's statement of pain of 6 to 7 out of 10 (on a 10 point pain scale 0 is no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-9 severe pain, 10 unbearable pain). Findings: During an review of Resident 217's Physician Order (PO), dated 11/1/24, Glucosamine-Chondritin Tablet (used to treat joint pain) 500mg-400 mg give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/7/24 at 8:23 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 217's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated November 2024 was reviewed. The MAR indicated the following: 11/2/24 a.m. shift medication was not administered. 11/2/24 p.m. shift medication was not administered. 11/3/24 a.m. shift medication was not administered. 11/3/24 p.m. shift medication was not administered. 11/4/24 a.m. shift medication was not administered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Repositioning for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20). This failure resulted in Resident 20 developing Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD- caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture). Findings: During an observation on 11/4/24 at 10:42 a.m. two staff members repositioned Resident 20. Resident 20 was non-verbal. During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated diagnoses including, weakness or the inability to move on the left side of her body, severe loss of strength on the left side of her body, inability to talk, and obesity. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/6/24 at 11:06 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) stated dependent residents are turned every two hours and as needed. Care Plan (CP) with a revision date of 9/27/24 was reviewed. The CP indicated two staff were to reposition Resident 20 at least once a shift and as necessary. DON stated Resident 20's CP should have been updated to turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 217), when the facility did not monitor changes in behavior and side effects for physician ordered medications, Mirtazapine (to treat depression) and Temazepam (to treat inability to sleep). This failure had the potential to affect the health and safety of Resident 217. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/6/24 at 11:52 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 217's Order Review History Report (ORHR), dated 11/4/24 was reviewed. The ORHR indicated, Resident 217 was on Mirtazapine 45 mg 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime. ADON stated the facility was not monitoring for behavior changes and no monitoring for side effects of Mirtazapine. Licensed nurses administered four doses of Mirtazapine to Resident 217 between 11/2/24-11/5/24 in p.m. During a concurrent interview and record on 11/6/24 at 11:54 a.m. with ADON, Resident 217's ORHR, dated 11/4/24 was reviewed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Food and Dining Preferences for two of six sampled residents (Resident 58 and Resident 48) when: 1. One of six sampled residents (Resident 58) was not offered an alternative food item. 2. One of six sampled residents (Resident 48) tie preference for dinner was not honored. These failures had the potential for Resident 48 and Resident 58's nutritional needs to be not be met and the potential for weight loss. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/4/24 at 12:53 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, Resident 58's Meal Tray Ticket (MTT) dated 11/4/24 was reviewed. The MTT indicated, Dislikes: Asparagus. CNA 2 stated Resident 58 disliked asparagus and Resident 58's meal tray included asparagus. During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 11/4/24 at 1:15 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, Resident 58's MTT dated 11/4/24 was reviewed. The MTT indicated, Standing Orders: Garden Salad Garden Salad [sic] (2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transportation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being dropped off alone at a wrong address and had the potential for harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 9/10/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 4 (severe cognitive impairment). During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission RECORD (AR), dated 10/15/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old male with the following diagnosis: a. Hemiplegia (weakness or inability to move one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (inability to move the arm, leg, and trunk of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to part of the brain) affecting the right dominant side. b. Memory deficit following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 experiencing psychosocial distress. Findings: During an interview on 9/27/24 at 1:09 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated Resident 1 reported Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated you don ' t tell me what to do, I tell you what to do. During an interview on 9/27/24 at 1:33 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I did not report it [what CNA 1 stated] when it happened because I was afraid physically and mentally. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool), dated August 30, 2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an assessment to determine cognition), score was 15 (score of 13 to 15 indicates cognitively intact). Resident 1's MDS indicated Resident 1 required Maximum assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for bathing and lower body dressing and Moderate assistance (helper does less than half the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living [tasks people do to manage one's basic needs, including personal hygiene or grooming, dressing, toileting, transferring or ambulating, and eating]) care assistance for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's fingernails were not cleaned and trimmed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 developing infection due to the spread of germs from fingernails. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), dated 9/4/24, the AR indicated, Diagnosis Information. Need for assistance with personal care. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/5/24 at 10:45 a.m. with Resident 2 in Resident 2's room, Resident 2 had dark gray debris underneath her long fingernails. Resident 2 stated her fingernails had not been cleaned and trimmed for days. Resident 2 stated, They're (fingernails) quite long and sharp. Resident 2 stated she needs assistance with cleaning and trimming her fingernails. During a review of Resident 2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) on dental services was followed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's weight loss due to difficulty eating. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Missing Property Report (MPR), dated 5/23/24, the MPR indicated Resident 1's family reported Resident 1's bottom dentures was missing. The MPR indicated, 6-6-24 facility is coordinating (with) Lumina Dental for eval (evaluation) on replacement of bottom dentures. During a review of Resident 1's medical records (MR), dated 5/23/24 to 6/24/24, the MR indicated no documentation of what the facility had done to ensure Resident 1 was able to eat and drink adequately while awaiting the dental services. During a review of Resident 1's meal intake log (MIL), dated May 2024, the MIL indicated: a. On 5/23/24, Resident 1 had 25% meal intake during breakfast, lunch, and dinner. b. On 5/24/24, Resident 1 had 75% meal intake during breakfast and lunch, and less than 25% meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff was not removed from resident care when an allegation of abuse was made. This had the potential to put the Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility's Reporting Form (RF), undated, the RF indicated, Date of the allegation.11/28/2023. Brief description of the allegation/injury: Physical Abuse. Around 8:35 p.m., [Resident 1] told this nurse that his CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant 1) hit him while providing care, [Resident 1] stated 'Nurse take her out of here I wanna report her she hit me with a towel to the right side of my face'. Immediately removed team member from resident's care. During an interview on 12/6/23, at 11:12 a.m., with Administrator, Administrator stated, on 11/28/23, between 8:30 and 9:00 p.m., Resident 1 accused CNA 1 of hitting him with a towel. Administrator stated, CNA 1 was removed from Resident 1's care and was assigned to other residents until the end of her shift at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1's rights to privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During an interview on 10/4/23, at 12:06 p.m. with Social Services Assistance (SSA), SSA stated Resident 2's daughter called on 9/25/23, informed her Resident 2 was given some paperwork which did not belong to Resident 2. SSA stated Resident 2's daughter return the paperwork and she shredded the two pages belonging to Resident 1. SSA stated at the time the facility had a printer down and multiple nurses were printing to the same printer. During an interview on 10/4/23, at 12:26 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated on 9/25/23, Resident 1's face sheet and order for x-ray was given to Resident 2 in the paperwork Resident 2 was given for an outside appointment. Administrator stated Resident 2's daughter caught the mistake. Administrator stated Nurse 1 handed the paperwork to Resident 2 but Nurse 2 prepared the paperwork. Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received medications as ordered by the attending physician (AP). This failure had the potential for Resident 1's infection to worsen and PICC (peripherally inserted central - is a long, thin tube that is inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) line to become clogged. Findings: During an interview on [DATE], at 1:52 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated there had had been a problem with having an available Registered Nurse (RN) to give him his IV (intravenous) medication. He stated it happened three times. During a review of Resident 1's Physician Order Sheet, (POS) dated [DATE], the POS indicated, Cefazolin [antibiotic - (ABX) medications used to treat infection] 2 gram [unit of measure] solution . Intravenous . Every Eight Hours for Six Weeks Starting [DATE] scheduled 7:00 [7 a.m.] 15:00 [3p.m.] 23:00 [11 p.m.] During a review of Resident 1's POS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate staff was available to provide medications intravenous (IV- giving medicines or fluids through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1's infection and healing to be negatively affected. Findings: During an interview on [DATE], at 1:52 p.m. with Resident 1 stated there had been a problem with having an available Registered Nurse (RN) to administer his IV medication. He stated it happened three times. During a review of Resident 1's Physician Order Sheet, (POS) dated [DATE], the POS indicated, Cefazolin [antibiotic - (ABX) medications used to treat infection] 2 gram [unit of measure] solution . Intravenous . Every Eight Hours for Six Weeks Starting [DATE] scheduled 7:00 [7 a.m.] 15:00 [3p.m.] 23:00 [11 p.m.] During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report, (CPR) undated, the CPR indicated, Problem [Resident 1] has infection following Right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) responsible party (RP) of a change in condition (COC). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s RP not to be fully informed of Resident 1 ' s health condition. Findings: During an interview on 7/12/23, at 1:55 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN 1), RN 1 stated if the condition is not something she can treat with the PRN (as needed) medication she would notify the resident ' s attending physician, the family, and follow up on the new physician orders. RN 1 stated she documents on the SBAR (situation, background, appearance, review, and notify - a communication form). During an interview on 7/12/23, at 2:26 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated she notifies the resident ' s family of all COC and change in medication or treatment. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/12/23, at 3:56 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1 ' s SBAR dated 4/22/23, was reviewed. The SBAR indicated [Resident 1] has increased confusion and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) physician ' s orders were carried out and treatment was administered promptly. This failure resulted in the delay of treatment and worsening of Resident 1 ' s health condition. Findings: During an interview on 7/27/23, at 11:41 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), LVN 2 stated if there are laboratory (lab) orders she notifies the resident ' s responsible party (RP) and the resident, place the order, and informed the lab department. LVN 2 stated if the lab orders are regular/routine, the labs are completed within 24 hours. LVN 2 stated she notifies the resident ' s attending physician as soon as the results come in. LVN 2 stated for new medications due to a change of condition (COC) she notifies the resident, resident ' s RP and then place the order. LVN 2 stated she administers antibiotic within four hours. LVN 2 confirmed Rocephin (medication use to treat infections) 1gm (grams- unit of measure) IM (intramuscular – medication administered into a muscle) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the fluid requirements for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving inadequate fluid and worsening of her health condition. Findings: During an interview on 7/12/23, at 1:46 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), CNA 1 stated during change of shift, the nurse and the outgoing CNA informed her of residents who are on fluid intake (I & O) monitoring. CNA 1 stated she writes down all the fluids intake and output of the resident and give it to the nurse. CNA 1 stated if she sees any change in the residents fluid intake and output, she informs the nurse right away. During an interview on 7/12/23, at 1:52 p.m. with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated for resident on fluid I & O monitoring, the nurse gives verbal report, she gives a certain amount of fluids to the resident and keep track. CNA 2 stated she documents in the electronic medical record (EMR). CNA 2 stated if she sees a decrease in fluid intake, she notifies the nurse. During an interview on 7/12/23, at 1:55 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician order laboratory (labs), and report results to the physician timely for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1). These failures resulted in delayed evaluation and treatment for Resident 1. Findings: During an interview on 7/27/23, at 11:41 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), LVN 2 stated if there are laboratory (lab) orders she notifies the resident ' s responsible party (RP) and the resident, place the order, and informed the lab department. LVN 2 stated if the lab orders are regular/routine, the labs are completed within 24 hours. LVN 2 stated she notifies the resident ' s attending physician as soon as the results come in. During an interview on 7/27/23, at 12:01 p.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated she puts the lab order in the computer, notifies the resident and family of the labs that were ordered and the reason why the labs were ordered. LVN 1 stated the lab order will be ordered and carried out the same day depending on the time of day, she stated within 24 hours. LVN 1 stated she notifies the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities noted by the consultant pharmacist in the Medication Regimen Review (MRR-a comprehensive pharmacy evaluation of the residents' medications) for 11 of 29 sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 24, Resident 39, Resident 42, Resident 46, Resident 61, and Resident 165) were reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician and the Director of Nursing (DON) promptly. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for adverse consequences and other medication-related problems. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/8/23, at 1:58 PM, with Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool) Nurse (MDSN), Resident 16's Consultant Pharmacists Recommendations (CPR), dated 1/24/23 was reviewed. The CPR indicated, The consultant pharmacist reviewed Resident 16's MRR. MDSN stated, there was no documentation of the pharmacy recommendation and the attending physician's review and action to the MRR. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) on Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices when one of one sampled staff member (Activities Staff- AS) did not wear hair net properly upon entering kitchen. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/7/23, at 11:14 AM, with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) 2, in the Resident dining room, AS was observed going into and coming out of the kitchen with approximately one half of the back of his head uncovered by a hair net. CDM 2 confirmed his hair should have been completely covered and asked AS to cover his hair with the hair net. During a review of the facility's P&P, titled Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, dated 10/2017, the P&P indicated, Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented when: 1. Occupational Therapist (OT) exited Resident 366's Room, on transmission-based precaution (a set of practices specific for patients with known or suspected infectious agents to prevent transmission), and laid down contaminated equipment, barbell and a long stick, on top of the Personal Protective Equipment (refers to gowns, gloves, masks, face shields, or goggles to protect the wearer from infection or injury) cart outside of Resident 366's room. OT held the contaminated equipment with bare hands, and walked away without performing hand hygiene. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 exited Resident 19's Room and without performing hand hygiene, put on a new pair of gloves to disinfect the box of Flonase Nasal Spray (provides relief of allergy symptoms, itchy, runny nose, sneezing), which was taken inside the resident's room. LVN 1 did not have a hand sanitizer in her cart. 3. LVN 2 prepared the medications for two of six sampled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure on Advance Directive (AD-written statement of persons' wishes regarding medical treatment and end-of-life) for six of 29 sampled residents (Resident 16, Resident 31, Resident 39, Resident 42, Resident 9, and Resident 49). This failure had the potential to result in procedures and treatment to be implemented against residents' rights and preferences. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/7/23, at 8:21 AM, with Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool) Nurse (MDSN), Resident 16's electronic medical record (EMR) titled Social History dated 11/3/22 was reviewed. The EMR/Social History indicated, Resident has Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Code Status per her request and facility will comply. Resident states she does have an AHCD (Advanced Healthcare Directive) but she is in the process of completing one. MDSN was unable to find documentation of Resident 16's AD or a documentation Social Services followed up on Resident 16's AD. During a concurrent interview and record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on Departmental Policy (Respiratory Therapy) -Prevention of Infection when the water of the humidifier bottles were not monitored for three of three sampled residents (Resident 40, Resident 49, and Resident 165). This failure had the potential for the residents to experience nasal, throat, and mouth dryness while inhaling dry oxygen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/23, at 8:55 AM, with Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool) Nurse (MDSN), inside Resident 49's room, Resident 49's oxygen concentrator (oxygen delivery device) was observed turned on at four (4) Liters per minute (unit of measure) via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator had no distilled water in the prefilled humidifier bottle (a device that moisturizes the air). MDSN confirmed the finding and stated, the water inside the humidifier should be monitored by the nurses and changed before the water level becomes low. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) when: 1. Diltiazem CD (medication to treat blood pressure and chest pain) 120 mg (milligram, a unit of measurement) PO (oral), Furosemide (water pill) 80 mg, Glimepride (medication to lower blood sugar) 4 mg were omitted for one of six sampled residents (Resident 35). 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not follow the manufacturer's direction to administer Linzess (medication to treat abdominal pain, bloating, and helps with bowel movement) 290 mcg (microgram, a unit of measurement) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5). 3. LVN 3 did not check blood pressure and pulse prior to administering two medications, Isordil ER (medication to prevent chest pain) 30 mg and Metoprolol ER (medication to lower blood pressure) 25 mg for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5). The cumulative medication error rate was 13.04% consisting of six total number of errors and 46 opportunities (6/46 x 100 = 13.04%). These failures resulted in residents not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 8) was assessed and determined appropriate to self-administer medication. This failure had the potential to result in undetected adverse effect from the medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/23, at 10:36 AM, with Resident 8, in Resident 8's Room, two medications, Biofreeze Cream (pain relieving cream) and Dermeleve Cream (medication to stop the itch) were found on the bedside table. Resident 8 stated, I use biofreeze and apply it on my knees. The dermeleve cream, I just got it on Friday. My daughter brought it to me. The nurses have not said anything about them. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/23, at 4:23 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, in Resident 8's room, LVN 4 confirmed biofreeze and dermeleve creams were on Resident 8's bedside table and stated, I am not aware [Resident 8] has biofreeze and dermeleve cream at bedside. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/23, at 4:30 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the need for denture care for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 19). This failure resulted in Resident 19 having loose dentures and being unable to chew properly, and the potential for Resident 19 to experience difficulties in maintaining nutritional needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/23, at 10:00 AM, with Resident 19, Resident 19's dentures appeared loose while speaking. Resident 19 stated, his dentures were supposed to be adjusted over six months ago but were not. Resident 19 stated, his loose dentures made it very difficult to chew and he had considered asking for a pureed (blended until smooth) diet. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/9/23, at 8:51 AM, with Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool) Nurse (MDSN), Resident 19's MDS Section L (Oral/Dental status), dated 10/11/22, was reviewed. MDSN stated, Resident 19 was readmitted on [DATE] and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0639 — isolatedMaintain 15 months of resident assessments in the resident's active clinical record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Social Services performed annual and quarterly resident assessments for three of 29 sampled residents (Resident 39, Resident 42, and Resident 54). This failure had the potential for unmet care needs. Findings: During an interview on 2/6/23, at 12:04 PM, with Resident 39, Resident 39 stated, I am feeling depressed all the time. I asked [for] something for depression and for my insomnia. I am stressed that I cannot go home. I have a son who has not talked to me in a month. I left him several messages but he has not talked to me for a petty thing. I don't have any other family who talks to me. My son does not understand that I cannot take a bus to visit him. During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), dated 9/25/21, the AR indicated, Resident 39 is a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including, but not limited to Major Depressive Disorder [a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 19). This failure resulted in Resident 19 having unmet care needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/23, at 10:00 AM, with Resident 19, in Resident 19's room, Resident 19's dentures appeared loose while speaking. Resident 19 stated, his dentures were supposed to be adjusted over six months ago but were not. Resident 19 stated, his loose dentures made it very difficult to chew and he had considered asking for a pureed (blended until smooth) diet. During an interview on 2/9/23, at 8:37 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, there was no dental care plan in place for Resident 19 and there should be one. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 3/2022, the P&P indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that indicates measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) on Repositioning when one of two sampled resident (Resident 316) was not turned every two hours. This failure had the potential to worsen Resident 316's deep tissue injury (DTI- injury to underlying tissue) on left ankle and contribute to the worsening of her right buttocks pressure injury (area of tissue damage that develops from prolonged pressure to skin) to stage II (two - skin breaks open and extends into deeper layers). Findings: During a review of Resident 316's Face Sheet (FS), undated, the FS indicated, Resident 316 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of fractured right fibula (broken leg bone), DTI of right buttock and DTI of other site. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 2/8/23, at 3:25 PM, with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 316's Clinical Notes Report (CNR), dated 1/23/23 was reviewed. The CNR indicated, Skin assessment done r/t [related to] new admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 and Housekeeper 1) were trained in fall prevention measures. This failure had the potential to increase the frequency of resident falls and resident injury. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/23, at 9:59 AM, with Housekeeper 1, on the [NAME] wing, Resident 37 and Resident 115's orange colored room name plates with a butterfly picture, on the wall near the entryway door, were observed. Housekeeper 1 stated, the resident name plates informed the family which residents were in the room. Housekeeper 1 stated, she did not know what the color of the resident's name plates indicated. During an interview on 2/8/23, at 10:08 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON). DON stated, all staff were trained yearly in fall prevention which included the meaning of resident name plate colors and what the butterfly wings indicated. DON stated, the number of wings on the butterfly picture indicated the number of staff required when staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure poured medications temporarily held were appropriately labeled and secured for three of six sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 368 and Resident 5) in the medication cart. This failure had the potential for adverse consequences in the health condition of the residents. 2. Ensure medications were available for one of six sampled residents' (Resident 35) use. This failure had the potential for Resident 35 to miss her medications and not receive its therapeutic benefits. 3. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 signed/initialed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) after giving the medications for two of six sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 6). This failure had the potential for healthcare providers to be misinformed of the residents medications and medication administration, which could result in adverse consequences. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/23, at 8 AM, with LVN 1 in the East Wing Hallway, in Resident 27's room during medication pass…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental service for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 19) promptly. This failure had the potential for the delay of dental care and provision of services. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/23, at 10 AM, with Resident 19, Resident 19's dentures appeared loose while speaking. Resident 19 stated, his dentures were supposed to be adjusted over six months ago but were not. Resident 19 stated, his loose dentures make it very difficult to chew and he had considered asking for a pureed (blended until smooth) diet. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/9/23, at 9:27 AM, with Social Service Designee (SSD) 1, Resident 19's Dental Notes (DN), dated 8/19/22 was reviewed. The DN indicated, PLD [partial lower denture] not fitting. Dremel [dental tool] not working unable to adj [adjust]. Adj PLD ASAP [as soon as possible] 1 wk [week]. SSD 1 stated, dental appointment for Resident 19 was not scheduled and Resident 19 was not seen again until 1/31/23. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-02-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-05 for 32 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.9 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUMANGOOD NORCAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/1977 |
| HUMANGOOD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/01/2016 |
| U.S. BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2018 |
| BAKER, JUDITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/25/2012 |
| BATTISON, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| BROWN, HERMAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| CHRISTOPHERSON, JOANNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/20/2025 |
| FELLER, IRENE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/12/2021 |
| GRIFFITH, ALAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/30/2019 |
| HOLMES, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| KELLEY, ALBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/21/2008 |
| ROTH, SHARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/08/2018 |
| COCHRANE, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/10/2009 |
| GHASSEMI, BETHANY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/21/2019 |
| MCDONALD, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| OGUS, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/27/2009 |
| HUMANGOOD SOCAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/1977 |
| BALABAN, ROCHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| DHAND, SANDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/09/2026 |
| GONZALES, DEBORAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/25/2022 |
| KAUR, MANDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| MEMON, PARVEZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| VANGELISTO, GWEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/30/2021 |
| BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/21/2025 |
| BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/21/2025 |
| BAKER TILLY US LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/15/2024 |
| HANSEN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2017 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2025 |
| WASHINGTON FEDERAL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/27/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555116. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.