The Terraces At San Joaquin Gardens Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 545 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.87 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 47.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · I2022-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — widespread
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systemic approach to ensure effective monitoring and systems to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 10 of 10 sampled Residents (145, 146, 25, 1, 28, 40, 31, 201, 197, and 34) when: 1. Resident 145 experienced a severe unplanned weight gain of 25.2 pounds (lbs-measurement of weight), or 10% of previous weight, in two days. Weights were obtained but were not communicated to the Physician and Registered Dietitian (RD) to determine effective interventions. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- an interdisciplinary team comprised of professionals from various disciplines who work in collaboration to address a Resident with multiple physical and psychological needs) did not meet to discuss the severe unplanned weight gain, interventions were not implemented to address the severe unplanned weight gain and the care plan did not reflect the weight gain. Resident 145 was diagnosed with congestive heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s family member reported Resident 1 ' s abuse allegation to a licensed nurse (LN) and the LN perform a resident assessment and document on an SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation- a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change of condition among the residents) note in the electronic medical record (EMR) according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P). This failure placed Resident 1 ' s safety at risk by not assessing her for signs and symptoms of potential abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture (a break in a bone) of the shaft of right humerus (middle part of the upper arm bone), aphasia (language disorder resulting from brain damage)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment when the facility's three tumble dryers in the laundry room was not maintained per the manufacturer's recommendations and had a layer of gray and white debris collected on the back of the dryer's vent and pipes. This failure had the potential to create a fire hazard that could have placed 50 of 50 residents at risk for displacement. Findings: During an observation and interview on 3/19/25 at 11:15 a.m. with the Director of Buildings and Grounds (MAIN) and laundry (LAU) in the laundry room, a layer of small gray and white particles covered the back of the three dryer vents and the pipe that lead from the back of the dryer to the wall. The LAU stated maintenance cleans behind the dryers and keeps the air ducts clean. Laundry stated the dust to the pipes and grate look good it's not bad. LAU stated it was important to remove the lint to avoid a buildup of dust. MAIN stated the facility provides maintenance to the dryer vents annually or as needed. MAIN stated it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 17, 197, 247) when: 1. Resident 17 had broken teeth and visible signs of tooth decay and no specific care plan interventions were put in place to address Resident 17's dental needs. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 17's dental needs to not be met which placed Resident 17 at an increased to develop dental infection. 2. Resident 197 and 247's care plans did not include their physician prescribed oxygen therapy (the administration of oxygen at concentrations greater than that of ambient air (20.9%) with the intent of treating or preventing the symptoms and manifestations of hypoxia-decreased perfusion of oxygen to the tissues). This failure had the potential for Resident 197 and 247 to not receive oxygen therapy as prescribed by their physician which had the potential to result in hypoxia and respiratory failure (a condition where there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for two of five sampled residents (Resident 347 and Resident 24) when: 1. Resident 347 did not have a care plan for the use of sling to left arm and splint to left foot. These failures placed Resident 347 at risk for complication from not having care plan needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing interventions needed to be added, changed or completed. 2. Resident 24 did not have a care plan for the use of antibiotic for clostridium difficile (C-diff-germ that causes diarrhea and colitis [inflammation of the colon]). This failure placed Resident 24 at risk for care needs not met. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 9:16 a.m. with Resident 347 in his room, Resident 347 was lying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 347 was observed with sling to left arm and splint to left foot. Resident 347 stated he fell at home and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of five sampled residents (Residents' 98 and 247) when: 1. Resident 98's oxygen (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organism) flow rate (the amount of oxygen being delivered to the body) was not administered according to the physician order. This failure resulted in Resident 98 to not receive the ordered amount of oxygen via oxygen concentrator (a machine that pulls in oxygen from the surrounding air) which could lead to breathing problems which includes shortness of breath, headache and confusion. 2. Resident 247's oxygen flow rate was set to 1.5L (liters-a unit of measurement) instead of the physician prescribed 2L/minute. This failure resulted in Resident 247 not receiving the correct amount of oxygen as ordered by the provider could have resulted in shortness of breath (SOB) and respiratory distress (difficulty breathing). 3. Licensed Nurses (LN)s did not clarify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were properly labeled and discarded after the discontinued date when: 1. In the west wing medication cart, Resident 36's discontinued ondansetron (medication used for nausea and vomiting) was not separated from active medications 2. In the south wing medication cart, Resident 37's discontinued benzonatate (medication used for cough) was not separated from active medications and Resident 98's insulin lispro (medication used to lower blood sugar) multidose vial was stored in medication cart, partially used and not labeled with an open or discard date. These failures had the potential for medications to be administered incorrectly causing an underdosing or overdosing of medications, or to be administered to the wrong residents causing harm to the residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 3:58 p.m., with Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 1 at the west wing medication cart, Resident 36's ondansetron 8 milligram (mg- unit of measure)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 4 p.m. with Resident 98 in her room, Resident 98 was in semi-sitting position in bed watching TV and stated she did not know how long she had been in the facility. Observed in the room next to Resident 98 bed was a nasal cannula on the floor under a bedside chair and connected to a oxygen concentrator (device that produces oxygen for breathing). Resident 98 stated she used the oxygen every day and had difficulty breathing without the oxygen. During a review of Resident of Resident 98's admission Record, (AR-document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 3/19/25, the AR indicated Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pulmonary edema (excess fluid accumulates in the lungs making it difficult to breath), shortness of breath and dependence on supplemental oxygen. During a review of Resident 98's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a functional and cognitive abilities assessment) assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status of one of five sampled residents (Resident 98) when Resident 98's surgical wound was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 98's care needs to not be met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 4:15 p.m., with Resident 98 in her room, Resident 98 was laying in bed watching TV. Resident 98 had a surgical wound with scabs on her midchest (middle area of the chest). Resident 98 stated she had an open heart surgery. During a review of Resident 98's admission Record (AR-a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, family contact information and other pertinent information) dated 3/19/25, the AR indicated, Resident 98 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary drugs for two of six randomly sampled residents when: 1. Resident 12 was administered ondansetron (a medication for nausea) and had active orders for both routine and as needed (prn) ondansetron, which exceeded the maximum daily dose (maximum dose in 24 hours). 2. Staff administered apixaban (a blood thinner) to Resident 24, but did not monitor for side effects of apixaban. These failures had the potential for Resident 12 to experience ondansetron toxicity including irregular heartbeat, and for Resident 24 to experience apixaban side effects including bleeding. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 3/17/2025 at 8:06 a.m., in Resident 12's room, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed administering one tablet of ondansetron to Resident 12. During a record review of Resident 12's Physician Orders (PO), Resident 12's PO indicated Resident 12 had two active orders for ondansetron. Resident 12's PO dated 1/7/2025, indicated an active routine order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five randomly sampled residents (Resident 12) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when the facility did not have an objective goal for number of behavioral episodes of escitalopram (medication used to treat depression) care planned for adequate monitoring and did not attempt a gradual dose reduction, when Resident 12 was administered escitalopram. These failures had the potential for Resident 12 to experience falls, sedation (sleepiness), fatigue, muscle cramps, and increased potential for Resident 12 to be isolated. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's Face Sheet (FS- a document containing resident's personal information), dated 3/20/25, Resident 12's FS indicated, Resident 12, age [AGE], had diagnoses including major depression and generalized anxiety disorder. During a review of Resident 12's Physician Orders (PO), Resident 12's PO…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA