Terraces of Boise, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 39.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.25 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.33 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Idaho State LTC Reporting Portal System, policy review, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's rights were protected to be free from misappropriation of residents' funds. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #39) whose record was reviewed for misappropriation. This deficient practice caused emotional and financial harm when Resident #39's personal finances were used by a facility staff member. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including a left pubic fracture, dementia, and depression. Resident #39's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #39 was cognitively intact. An I&A, dated 12/4/25, was submitted to the Idaho State LTC Reporting Portal System identifying a facility staff member had stolen $1900 from Resident #39.The report documented on 12/4/25 at 11:30 AM, the Executive Director (ED) was contacted by the Boise Police Department regarding the status of an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review I&A report review, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights were within residents' reach. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #49 when she fractured her left hip and left wrist. Findings include: The facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents policy, revised July 2017, documented the facility strived to make the environment as free from accidents and hazards as possible. It also stated the facility identified hazards and risks on an ongoing basis. This policy was not followed. 1. Resident #49 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including a tibia fracture. An MDS admission assessment, dated 11/28/23, documented Resident #49 required supervision or touching (cueing) assistance for upper body dressing and supervision or touching assistance when rolling left or right. Resident #49's care plan, dated 11/21/23, directed staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, the FDA Food Code, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food items were appropriately labeled, dated, and covered, dish racks and air condenser refrigerator fans were cleaned and sanitized. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 36 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: Based on observation, the FDA Food Code, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure food items were appropriately labeled, dated, and covered, and dish racks, air condenser refrigerator fans were cleaned and sanitized. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 36 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. The FDA Food Code Section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure sanitary laundry services were provided to the residents, hand hygiene was performed by facility staff, and medication was stored appropriately. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if facility residents were provided laundry, staff cares, and medications which were not handled with appropriate sanitation practices. Findings include: 1. On 12/17/25 at 2:35 PM, it was observed in Redwood House's laundry room, Resident #18's laundry was left wet in the washing machine. On 12/17/25 at 2:37 PM, RN #1 stated Resident #18's laundry would not have been washed earlier than 10:00 AM as CNAs will sometimes do laundry during the day if a resident requires it. She stated, the facility has a shift change at 2:00 PM in the afternoon, so the laundry would not have been waiting wet more than 4 hours. RN #1 could not provide an exact time the laundry had been started as the day shift CNAs were no longer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity when referring to resident's as feeders who require assistance when eating, as well as serving meals at the same time to residents sitting at the same table. This was true for 4 of 4 residents (#3, #13, #17, and #22) who were observed during dining. This deficient practice had the potential to create psychosocial harm to residents if resident's felt inferior by being referred to as feeders or not being served meals at the same time. Findings include:The Facility's Dignity Policy, revised February 2021, documented residents are to be cared for in a manner which promotes and enhances their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Staff are expected to provide a dignified dining experience, and to always speak respectfully to residents.1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, SOM Appendix PP, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide timely meals to residents when they had to wait more than 45 minutes to receive breakfast from the posted time. This was true for 7 of 15 residents (#3, #13, #14, #17, #22, #33 and #50) observed during dining service. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents did not receive their meal to avoid potential food-medication interactions, and psychosocial harm if not provided meals in a timely manner. Findings include:A review of the MDS Assessment, section GG, self care, documented Resident #33 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, Resident's #3 and #13 were dependent for eating, Resident #17 required partial/moderate assistance, and Resident #14 required supervision or touching assistance. On 2/9/26 at 7:15 AM, a dining meal schedule was observed posted in the [NAME] dining room which documented a hot breakfast serviced started at 8:00 AM.Four staff members (1 LPN and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure position change alarms were assessed as potential restraints and a consent from the residents' representative and physician's order were obtained prior to installation of the alarms. This was true for 2 of 3 residents (#14 and #22) reviewed for potential restraints. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if the position change alarms were improperly used and if resident's experienced physical deterioration due to lack of movement. Findings include:The State Manual Appendix PP issued 7/23/25, documented if the facility staff choose to implement alarms, they should document their use aimed at assisting the staff to assess patterns and routines of the resident. Use of these devices, like any care planning intervention, must be based on assessment of the resident and monitored for efficacy on an on-going basis.The facility's Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy revised March 2018, documented:If…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's missing personal item was investigated as potential misappropriation of resident's property. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #34) reviewed for misappropriation of personal property. This failure created the potential for Resident #34 to experience emotional distress due to the loss of a personal item with inherent value. Findings include:Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder that affects the nervous system), diabetes and hypertension.A Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #34 was cognitively intact.On 12/16/25 at 9:36 AM, Resident #34 stated a ring which was given to her by her grandmother went missing. Resident #34 stated she reported it to the facility and was told they will look for it. Resident #34 stated she was told the ring had not been found yet,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's MDS assessments accurately reflected their status. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) whose MDS assessment was reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if Resident #6 was not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including heart disease, anemia, and hypertension.Resident #6's MDS assessments documented the following: admission assessment dated [DATE], he had no impairment on his upper and lower extremities Quarterly assessment dated [DATE], he had impairments on both sides of his upper and lower extremities.Resident #6 was observed on the following days as follows: 12/16/25 at 3:05 PM, able to move his both [NAME] while his wheelchair was being push by the staff. 12/17/25 at 10:52 AM, sitting in his wheelchair in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to follow residents comprehensive centered care plans. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for care plan implementation. This deficient practice had the potential for physical harm related to Resident #22's receiving beverages that did not meet her ordered dietary needs. Findings include:The facility's Care Plan policy, revised March 2022, documented care interventions are chosen after data gathering, considering the residents problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decisions. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, dementia, depression, and anxiety.Resident #22's care plan, initiated 4/3/25, documented a diet order to include offering unsweetened or sugar-free beverages.On 2/9/26 the following observations were made:At 7:37 AM, CNA #2 provided Resident #22 with orange juice.At 8:33 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised as needed. This was true for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #8) whose record was reviewed for care plan revision. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if the Resident #8 did not receive oxygen treatment as ordered. Findings include:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs).A physician's order, dated 11/12/25, directed staff to provide oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula, at all times for every shift.Resident #8's care plan, dated 11/12/25, directed staff to provide oxygen continuously at 2 LPM via nasal cannula and to provide oxygen monitoring and management.On 12/16/25 at 9:19 AM, Resident #8 was observed lying in bed without an oxygen nasal cannula.On 12/18/25 at 11:36 AM, Resident #8 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #42) observed during medication administrations. This failed practice created the potential for Resident #42 to experienced adverse effects when her medications were not administered according to physician's order. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications policy revised April 2019 documented the individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medications, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.Resident 342 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnose including inflammatory neuropathy (condition that affects the peripheral nerves, leading to symptoms such as weakness, numbness, and pain), anemia and hypertension.A physician's order documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,501 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-12-19
• $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-12-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $973K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID