Valle Verde Health Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 422 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 248 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 55.7 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an unstageable (a severe wound where the true depth and extent of tissue damage cannot be determined because the wound bed is completely obscured by dead tissue) pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue) in one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a left ankle-foot orthosis boot (AFO - a medical brace designed to support the ankle) status post-surgery and was found with an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left foot approximately 6 weeks later. This facility failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing pain in the affected area (left foot) with psychosocial fear of losing a limb secondary to existing medical conditions (type 2 diabetes mellitus [Type 2 DM] - disease requiring daily insulin injections to manage blood sugar levels).During a review of Resident 1's medical records, the admission record (AR), dated 6/30/26, indicated an admission date of 4/27/26, for rehabilitation following a left ankle foot fracture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment -a medical document that translates treatment preferences into actionable medical orders) was signed by the Responsible Party (RP- one who has authority to make healthcare decisions) for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 14).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 14's wishes regarding medical treatment not being followed.Findings:During a review of Resident 14's POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment [a medical document that translates treatment preferences into actionable medical orders]), dated 11/10/25, Resident 14 signed the POLST consenting to DNR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation), Selective Treatment - goal of treating medical conditions while avoiding burdensome measures, Request transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met in current location, and Trial period of artificial nutrition, including feeding tubes.During a review of Resident 14's H&P (History and Physical) dated 11/11/25, the H&P indicated, The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1.Develop a care plan and interventions for hearing impairment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential for Resident 8's hearing impairment to worsen and thus impact the resident's quality of life.2.Implement care plan interventions for Resident 11 related to access to call light and repositioning in bed. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 not to receive the necessary care needed. 1.During a record review of Resident 8's comprehensive assessment, dated 12/04/25, this indicated Resident 8 was assessed to have hearing impairment.During an observation on 01/07/26 at10:55 a.m. Resident 8 was in the common area near the activity room reading a newspaper with no hearing aids. When greeted, Resident 8 just stared at this surveyor.During an interview on 01/08/26 at 10:45 a.m. with Resident 8's Responsible Party (RP), the RP stated Resident 8 can be moody if not wearing the hearing aids and can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 1Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a mechanically altered diet order for one unsampled resident (Resident 53), who had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), when staff served Resident 53 coffee without thickener.This failure had the potential to cause swallowing discomfort and/or aspiration (the accidental entry of a fluid or food into the airway or lungs) for Resident 53.During a review of Resident 53's clinical record, it indicated that Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Bell's Palsy.During an observation on 1/6/26 at 12:18 p.m. in the resident dining room, Resident 53 was served a meal tray by staff. As Resident 53 started eating without assistance, another staff member brought Resident 53 a cup of coffee, from which Resident 53 sipped.During a review of Resident 53's menu and attached strip of paper with diet order found next to meal tray, it indicated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. The Infection Prevention Control and Program (IPCP) standards and policies were reviewed at least annually. This failure had the potential for the facility to implement outdated infection control standards, policies, and protocols that can lead to an ineffective infection control program2. Staff followed manufacturer's instructions on cleaning and disinfecting a blood sugar monitor machine (glucometer). This failure had the potential for cross contamination of blood transmitted infections. During an interview on 01/08/26 at 11:30 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated the IPCP policies and procedures are online and that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) was responsible for reviewing the IPCP Policies and Procedures (P&P). The IP was unable to provide an answer as to when the policies should be reviewed and the last date it was reviewed. During the interview on 01/08/2026 at 2:43 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed there was no tracking system to determine when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a patient care equipment, a glucometer (a device used for measuring the concentration of glucose in the blood for diabetics), was maintained in a safe operating condition.This failure had the potential to result in false blood sugar readings, compromising the health and well-being of residents.Findings:Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a glucometer (a device used for measuring the concentration of glucose in the blood for diabetics), was maintained in a safe operating condition.This failure had the potential to result in false blood sugar readings, compromising the health and well-being of residents.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26, at 10:01 a.m., a glucometer logbook (logbook where glucometer test check results are listed) for the month of December 2025 was missing glucometer test check result entries from 12/1/25 to 12/17/25. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26, at 10:01 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (referred to as Director of Dining Services (DDS)), albeit was a full time (FT) position, DDS was responsible for not only the main kitchen that provided foodservice for the residents residing in the Health Center (skilled nursing facility), but also responsible for two other foodservice operations located on the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) campus, community Meals on Wheels, and providing food for another contracted small health facility. DDS failed to demonstrate appropriate skill set related to sufficient managerial monitoring and guidance related to: 1a. TCS foods (Time Temperature Control for Safety - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) were not consistently and accurately cooled down to ensure food safety; 1b. An ice machine was not sanitary; 1c. Incomplete cleaning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service when: 1. TCS foods (Time Temperature Control for Safety - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) were not consistently and accurately cooled down to ensure food safety. 2. The ice machine, located in a pantry near a nursing station, utilized for residents was not maintained in a sanitary condition. 3. There were unsanitary conditions in the main kitchen related to: 3a. Kitchen floors with build -up of dried food debris. 3b. Floor drains with build- up of dried food debris. 3c. Clean equipment stored on unclean shelves. 4. There was a container of cooked pasta in the walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen that was not dated. 5. Foodservice equipment was not maintained in good repair as evidenced by leaking pipes, located in the warewashing areas of the main kitchen, in which the water was pooled into a container which could attract pests such as insects and rodents. 6.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Emergency Drug Supply Kit (E-kit) was stocked accurately according to the table of contents. This failure had the potential for residents not to receive necessary medications in case of emergency. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/7/25 at 12:30 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), one unopened E-kit was observed in the medication storage room in station 2 with green colored locks. IP stated green locks indicates E-kit has not been opened by facility staff. The list of contents (on the outside of this E-kit) indicated Keflex (a medication used to treat infections caused by bacteria) 250 milligrams (mg) 8 caps (capsules). The letters 8 caps is crossed out and the number 2 is written next to it, indicating this E-kit contained 2 capsules of Keflex. Upon inspection of E-kit contents, 8 capsules of Keflex 250 mg were observed. IP acknowledged E-kit stock does not match the table of contents. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Emergency Kit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Expired items in the medication storage room, medication cart, and treatment cart were discarded and not readily available for staff use. 2. A work order was done when the temperature of the medication refrigerator was below acceptable range. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired and ineffective medications. Findings: 1. a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/7/25 at 2:40 p.m., with Licensed nurse (LN) 1, one vial of Lantus (a medication used to manage blood sugar levels) was stored in medication cart 1B with an open date of 12/1/24 and an expiration date of 12/28/24. Manufacture's instruction on box indicated vial should be discarded after 28 days of opening date. LN 1 acknowledged the Lantus was expired and stated she administered the Lantus to the resident that morning. b. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/7/25 at 12:01 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) in the medication room in station 2, a box of budesonide ampules (medicine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu for the therapeutic Mechanical [Mech] Soft Chopped (Level 6) [Level 6 - Soft & Bite-Sized (SB6)] diet (SB6 diet; food may be used when not able to bite off pieces of food safely but are able to chew bite-sized pieces down into little pieces that are safe to swallow) was developed and prepared in accordance with established national guidelines, IDDSI (International Dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] Diet Standardization Initiative), when the facility's menu modified the Level 6/SB 6 framework by incorporating unsafe foods based on an out-of-date Mech Soft Chopped diet from an obsolete National Dysphagia Diet (NDD). There were seven residents residing at the facility with a Mech [mechanical] Soft diet order that were provided Mech Soft Chopped (Level 6) menus as follows: Resident # (number) 2, Resident #33, Resident #45, Resident #1, Resident # 6, Resident #11, Resident #16. As a result, the facility co-mingled an out-of-date therapeutic diet Mech Soft Chopped (NDD) that was no longer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA