No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Terraces At Los Altos Health Facility

373 Pine Lane, Los Altos, CA 94022 · Non profit - Corporation · 30 certified beds · (650) 948-8291 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (650) 948-8291 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
960 N San Antonio Rd · (650) 498-9000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2630 W El Camino Real · (650) 941-8430 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
690 Los Altos Ave · (650) 948-6648 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(650) 917-0244 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.9%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%11.2%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 457 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.81U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.61hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 248 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.1%CMS range 59.1–68.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 8.5–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 3.1–8.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.93
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
47.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 28.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.55 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.75 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.80 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-01)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen when:There were whitish substances below the steamer and on a metal cart in front of the steamer; 2. There were whitish-grayish substances on a black cart in the dry storage area that was used to store utensils and food containers; 3. There were whitish substances on the edges of the food warmer cart in the dry storage area; 4. There were two open packs of brown grapes and one pack of raw broccoli that were unlabeled and undated in the walk-in refrigerator; 5. There were whitish substances on the outside surface of the ice machine; and, 6. Nine cutting boards were discolored, worn out, and had deep cuts and scratches.These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness in a population of vulnerable residents with complex medical conditions.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dining Director (DD) on 7/28/25, at 9:32 a.m., the following were observed: 1. There were whitish substances below the steamer and on a metal cart in front…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for four of seven residents (Residents 46, 76, 105, and 2) . Failure to complete and transmit MDS assessments had the potential to compromise the accuracy of the facility's quality measures (reports that reflect the facility's performance in certain care areas). This could negatively affect the facility's ability to identify areas for improvement and implement interventions accordingly.Findings: 1. Review of Resident 46's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 4/26/25. Resident 46's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was incomplete and not transmitted. Review of Resident 76's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 4/25/25. Resident 76's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was incomplete. Review of Resident 105's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 5/13/25. Resident 105's discharge MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when:1. A nebulizer machine (device used to deliver medication in the form of a mist for inhalation) mask, chamber (part of the mask that holds the liquid medication), and tubing were stored inside the bedside drawer of resident 127 and the mask was touching the drawer surface;2. An inhaler chamber attachment (device that attaches to an inhaler to make it easier to breath the medication in) had a yellowish substance around the mouthpiece and was stored on top of resident 2's bedside table;3. Garbage and recycle bins were open and exposed while three Residents were eating lunch; 4. A licensed nurse did not wear gloves when holding and cutting a medication; andThese failures could result in the spread of infection and cross-contamination that could affect the 28 residents who reside in the facility.1.During an initial tour of the facility on 7/28/25 at 10:56 a.m., Resident 127's nebulizer machine mask, chamber, and tubing were stored inside the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (Residents 82, 111, and 118) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications that cause changes in mood, feelings, or behavior) when:For Resident 82, his order for quetiapine fumarate (medication used to treat psychotic disorders) did not specify what dose do administer;For Resident 111, there was no documentation that staff were monitoring for side effects of venlafaxine (medication used to treat depression); andFor Resident 118, there was no documentation that staff were monitoring for side effects and target behaviors (behaviors intended to be changed or eliminated by the medication) for trazodone (medication used to treat depression).These failures had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to determine whether, or not, the psychotropic medications were safe and effective for the residents.Findings: 1. Review of Resident 82's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the long-term care Ombudsman (resident advocate) was notified of transfers or discharges for two of four residents (Residents 82 and 2). For Resident 2, the facility also failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed. Failure to notify the Ombudsman had the potential to compromise the residents' admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Failure to complete a discharge summary had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to ensure the resident received appropriate care and services after leaving the facility.Findings: 1. Review of Resident 82's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including bladder cancer and kidney failure. Review of Resident 82's progress notes, dated 4/15/25, indicated he had a change of condition and was transferred to the hospital. There was no documentation in the medical record that indicated the facility notified the Ombudsman of this hospital transfer. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission for one of thirteen sampled Residents (Resident 127). This failure resulted in a delayed plan of care for Resident 127.Findings:Review of Resident 127's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Congestive heart failure (inability of heart to pump enough blood), atherosclerotic heart disease (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat where the heart to beats too quickly) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease that affects airflow in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe).Review of Resident 127's physician's order, dated 7/25/25, indicated Nitroglycerine tablet sublingual (a fast-acting medication used to relieve and prevent chest pain) 0.4 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) give one tablet sublingually (under the tongue)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 35) when a care plan for Nystop External Powder (a brand name for topical nystatin, an antifungal medication used to treat skin infections caused by yeast) was not developed. This failure had the potential to not meet the residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs.Review of Resident 35's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including difficulty in walking, cellulitis (a skin infection) of left and right lower limbs (lower legs), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic venous hypertension (CVH, a condition where the veins in the legs experience elevated, persistent pressure due to impaired blood flow back to the heart) with inflammation of bilateral lower extremities (legs).Review of Resident 35's physician's order, dated 7/21/25, indicated Nystop External Powder 100,000 unit/gm (gm, a unit of weight in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 19 residents (Residents 119, 120, and 114) were free from unnecessary medications when:Resident 119 had no side effects monitoring for heparin (an anticoagulant [blood thinner] used to decrease the clotting ability of the blood and help prevent harmful clots from forming in blood vessels); 2. Resident 120 had three identical orders for oxycodone (a potent controlled medication for pain); and 3. Resident 114 had no side effects monitoring for Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots).These failures resulted in unmonitored side effects of anticoagulant medications and duplicate orders that had the potential for excessive dose/adverse effects for the residents. Findings:1. Review of Resident 119's clinical record indicated Resident 119 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including coronary artery dissection (tear in the inner layer of a coronary artery [blood vessel that supplies oxygen and nutrients to the heart muscle]). Resident 119's physician's orders indicated an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 6.9% when two medication errors occurred out of 29 opportunities during the medication administration for two out of 12 residents (Residents 111 and 67) when:1. For Resident 111, Registered Nurse B (RN B) did not follow a physician's order to hold midodrine (medication used to raise blood pressure) for systolic blood pressure (SBP, the top number in a blood pressure reading) greater than 120; and2. For Resident 67, Registered Nurse C (RN C) administered eyedrops and did not wait three to four minutes before instilling a second drop in each eye. These failures had the potential to result in the residents experiencing complications and not receiving the full therapeutic effects of medications. Findings:1. During the medication administration observation on 7/28/2025 at 12:17 p.m., RN B was observed preparing one medication tablet for Resident 111. The medication was midodrine 2.5 milligrams (mg, unit of dose measurement). RN B administered the medication to Resident 111. RN B did not appear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly in one medication cart and for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 35 and 127) when:1. Two expired bottles of over the counter medication (OTC) medications were not removed from the medication cart;2. A bottle of Nystop External Powder (a brand name for topical nystatin, an antifungal medication used to treat skin infections caused by yeast) was kept on Resident 35's bedside table unattended; and,3. A bottle of Nitroglycerine sublingual tablets (a fast-acting medication used to relieve and prevent chest pain) was kept on resident 127's bedside table unattended.These failures had the potential for unsafe and improper administration of medications. Findings: 1. During an inspection of Medication Cart X on [DATE] at 3:55 p.m., with Registered Nurse D (RN D), there was one opened bottle of Naproxen (medication used to relieve pain, inflammation, and fever) 220 milligrams (mg, unit of dose measurement)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two of 13 sampled residents (Residents 82 and 119) when:For Resident 82, there was a typographical error in his order to monitor urine output; and,For Resident 119, the medical record did not accurately reflect the resident's refusal of a lab test.These failures had the potential to compromise the care and safety of the residents.1. Review of Resident's 82's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including bladder cancer, hydronephrosis (swelling of the kidneys caused by a backup of urine), and kidney failure. Further review of the medical record indicated Resident 82 had nephrostomy tubes (small flexible tubes inserted through the skin and into the kidneys to drain urine) in both kidneys. Review of Resident 82's Order Summary Report indicated he had a physician's order, dated 5/31/25, to measure output (amount of urine drained) from the left nephrostomy tube every shift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT, team composed of members from different departments involved in resident's care) failed to review and revise the fall risk care plan after a fall incident for one of four residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 experiencing further falls. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including pathological fracture (broken bones caused by disease) in neoplastic disease, pelvis, unspecified B-cell lymphoma (a type of cancer), severe obesity due to excess calories, and neoplastic related fatigue (persistent feeling of exhaustion caused by cancer and its treatments). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/3/24, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment to test a person's cognition level) score was 14 (a score of 13-15 indicates the resident is cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct administration of medication when the licensed vocational nurse A entered the medication order to the wrong resident. This failure resulted in one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) receiving a medication that was not prescribed for this resident. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/5/24 at 3:38 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON), stated she entered the medication Abrysvo (vaccine that protects against lower respiratory tract disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus [RSV])120 microgram (mcg) /0.5 milliliter (ml -metric unit used to measure volume) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident 1) when: 1. medications were not administered as ordered by the physician; and, 2. Resident 1's physician was not informed regarding missed doses of medication. These failures had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including fractured shaft of right fibula (a break of the larger lower leg bone below the knee joint), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), congestive heart failure (heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure pressure), presence of cardiac pacemaker (implantable device that regulates heart muscle and contractions) Review of Resident 1's physician's order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-09 · tag F0700 — widespread
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or attempt alternatives, explain risks and benefits, or obtain informed consent prior to the use of side rails in accordance with their bed rails (side rails, safety rails, and grab/assist bars) policy for 25 of 25 residents (137, 80, 16, 23, 179, 180, 181, 182, 14, 4, 138, 10, 18, 130, 11, 2, 12, 7, 6, 129, 131, 133, 136, 132, 30). These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk of entrapment and serious injury. For Resident 30, it resulted in the resident's left hand getting caught between the mattress and quarter [one-fourth, one part of a whole divided into four equal parts] side bed rail. Findings: During an observation in Resident 137's room on 4/2/24 at 8:29 a.m., Resident 137 was in bed with bilateral side rails. Review of Resident 137's physician order, dated 3/14/24, indicated he had an order for Side Rails: Quarter. Review of Resident 137's Side Rail Evaluation, dated 3/14/24, indicated bilateral side rails were recommended. There was no documentation that indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facilty failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen when: 1. Kitchen staff did not wear hair restraints while in the kitchen; 2. A red bucket was stored on the floor 3. A dietary aide picked up an item from floor and did not perform proper hand hygiene 4. Three of three ice machines had white residue or scale (the buildup of a white, chalk-like substance that forms where water collects or where water is dispensed) . These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and spread food-borne illness to residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an kitchen observation on 4/2/24 at 8:27 a.m., the dishwasher did not have a hair restraint over his hair. During an observation on 4/3/24 at 3:07 p.m., a staff member walked through the kitchen with no hair restraint. During a concurrent observation and interview in the kitchen with the director of dining services (DDS) and nutritional care manager (NCM) on 4/3/24 at 3:18 p.m., the DDS was not wearing a hair restraint. The NCM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the proper agencies per the facility's abuse policy for one of two residents (Resident 23) when Resident 23's abuse allegation was not reported after surveyor notified the administrator (ADM) and executive director (ED). This failure left information relevant to an allegation of abuse unreported to agencies required to be reported to for such allegations. Findings: Review of Resident 23's clinical information yielded a face sheet that indicated she was admitted with diagnoses which included atrial flutter (a type of abnormal heart rhythm, or arrhythmia), muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis (joint pain and stiffness). Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated she had full mental capacity per her brief interview of mental status, dated 2/29/2024, with a score of 15 (on a scale of 0-15, 15 being full capacity). During an interview with Resident 23 on 4/02/24 at 8:41 AM, in her room, she stated a nurse on night shift was rough when she was cleaning her.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 180) when weekly weights were not done as ordered by the physician. This failure of not following a physician's order resulted in the facility to be unaware of Resident 180's weight for over two weeks. Findings: Review of Resident 180's medical record face sheet (summary of important information) indicated she was admitted with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs) and muscle weakness. A physician's order, dated 3/13/24, was for weekly weights. The Resident Vital Sign Report indicated no documentation of weights since 3/18/24. During interview and concurrent record review with the admissions nurse on 4/9/24 at 2:02 p.m., she stated Resident 180 had no weights taken between 3/18/24 and 4/4/24. Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised 3/2022, indicated, Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a pressure ulcer (damage to the skin caused by prolonged pressure) from developing for one of two residents (Resident 12) when a medical device was not placed properly. This failure resulted in a facility-acquired pressure ulcer for Resident 12. Findings: Review of Resident 12's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fractured left foot. Review of Resident 12's physician order, dated 2/28/24, indicated to keep left boot on at all times. Review of Resident 12's wound assessment, dated 3/9/24, indicated a facility acquired presssure injury to the left heel was identified on 3/9/24. Review of Resident 12's skin note, dated 3/12/24, indicated the resident was evaluated by the wound specialist on 3/12/24 for medical equipment related wound on his left heel. During an interview on 4/2/24 at 12:09 p.m., registered nurse D (RN D) stated Resident 12 developed a big blister on his heel from his boot about three weeks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1. administer all physician ordered medications to one of three residents (Resident 2) when his Miconazole nitrate 2% topical cream (antifungal cream) was not administered during medication administration, and 2. ensure proper accounting of the controlled medication oxycodone (a semi-synthetic narcotic analgesic drug to relieve pain) in one of two medication carts (med cart 1) when the count of the oxycodone whole tablet (tab) and half tab were not correct. These failures had actual (for Resident 2) and potential implications for residents to not receive their prescribed medication(s) correctly. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was admitted with diagnoses which included psoriasis (a chronic (long-lasting) disease in which the immune system becomes overactive, causing skin cells to multiply too quickly. Patches of skin become scaly and inflamed). During an observation of a medication administration on 4/04/24 at 8:23 AM by licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C) for Resident 2, his Miconazole nitrate 2% topical cream was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (Residents 130 and 131) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. 1. For Resident 130, there was no side effect monitoring and behavior monitoring for the use of trazodone (medication used to treat depression or help with sleep problems); 2. For Resident 131, there was no side effect monitoring and behavior monitoring for the use of trazodone. These failures had the potential to result in lack of adequate monitoring and for the residents to receive unnecessary medications. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 130's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 130's physician orders indicated he had an order, dated 3/29/24 for trazodone 50 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) every bedtime for insomnia (sleep disorder). There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention strategies when: 1. A nurse did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene during one of two dressing changes. 2. One of three urinary catheter bags was on the ground. These failures had the potential to spread infectious organisms to the residents. Findings: During a wound dressing change observation on 4/2/24 at 12:09 p.m., registered nurse D (RN D) prepared Resident 12's wound supplies and put on gloves. RN D removed Resident 12's boot and removed the dressing on his heel. Using the same gloves, RN D cleaned the wound with saline and put on a new dressing. Using the same gloves, RN D cleaned the other wounds on top of Resident 12's foot. RN D did not change gloves or wash or sanitize hands after removing the wound dressing, before cleaning the wound, and before cleaning another wound. During an interview on 4/2/24 at 12:25 p.m., RN D confirmed she only used one pair of gloves throughout Resident 12's wound dressing change. During an interview with the director of staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 7) was offered and/or received influenza (a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) and pneumococcal (common bacteria that can affect different parts of the body) vaccinations. This failure increased the potential to for residents to have inadequate immunity to influenza and pneumococcal infections. Findings: Review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated she was 85-years-old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's Immunizations Report, dated 4/9/24, indicated she received an influenza vaccination on 11/13/21. There was no documentation that Resident 7 was offered and/or received an influenza vaccination in 2023 or 2024. There was no documentation that Resident 7 was offered and/or received a pneumococcal vaccination. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 11:25 a.m., the director of staff development (DSD) confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Two routine pain medications were obtained and administered, as ordered, to meet the needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The nursing staff failed to call the pharmacy to clarify order changes, and to notify the physician when they ran out of the medications for administration. The failure exposed Resident 1 to unnecessary pain; 2. Two of two controlled medication (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) emergency kits (E-kit: a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) were locked in the medication room. This had the potential for loss or abuse of controlled medications; and 3. One of two opened E-kits was replaced timely to ensure availability of medications for resident use in case of an emergency. Findings: 1a. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/26/24 at 9:20 a.m., she stated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication errors when Resident 1 did not recieve two routine pain medications as prescribed. The failure exposed Resident 1 to unnecessary pain. Findings: a. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/26/24 at 9:20 a.m., she stated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with stage 4 cancer and required every-3-hour oxycodone (a potent narcotic for moderate to severe pain) routinely; she was also receiving methadone routinely for pain. The pharmacy only sent enough supply of oxycodone for 3 days. The medication ran out, and Resident 1 missed her first oxycodone dose on 1/12/14 in the evening. On 1/14/24, the night shift nurse texted her and the Administrator early in the morning letting them know he needed the oxycodone for Resident 1. The DON stated she called the physician and asked him to write a new prescription for oxycodone on that day,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled appropriately when: 1. One of one medication refrigerator was identified unlocked when not in use; and its temperature was not being monitored and maintained twice daily as per facility policy and procedures (P&P). This failure could lead to loss of medications, and loss of drug potency due unmonitored temperatures; 2. An opened multi-dose vial did not have an open date. The failure had the potential for the medication being used past its effective date. Findings: 1. During a visit to the medication room with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/26/24 at 9:50 a.m., a a medication refrigerator was identified unlocked. A brief review of the contents inside revealed the refrigerator contained numerous medications include a bubble pack containing 30 dronabinol (a controlled medication [those with high potential for abuse and addiction] to treat nausea and vomiting) capsules for a resident, and an emergency kit (a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (AD, a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care when the individual is incapacitated) or Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) was completed for 7 of 17 sampled residents (Residents 17, 21, 25, 26, 232, 329 and 330). These failures could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services, which are against the resident's goals and wishes. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 232's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 232's POLST form indicated the AD section of the POLST was blank. The POLST form did not indicate if there was an advance directive in place or it was not available. Review of Resident 232's POLST indicated the form was prepared on 2/18/23 and Section D: Information and Signatures was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident 14's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 14 was transferred to the acute hospital on 1/27/23 due to a fever and altered mental status and again on 2/24/23 for critically low hemoglobin (protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen in the bloodstream). Review of Resident 280's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 280 was transferred to the acute care hospital on [DATE] after sustaining a fall resulting in uncontrolled back pain. Review of Resident 280's clinical record indicated he was discharged from the facility on 12/21/22. Resident 280 was discharged home with home health services. Review of Resident 282's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 282 was transferred to the acute care hospital on [DATE] after sustaining a fall and suffering a right forehead hematoma (a solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues) Review of Resident 282's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled substance counting (medications with high potential for abuse or addiction) sign-off sheets for every shift were initialed by license nurses when: Narcotic sign-off sheets were missing initials by licensed nurses for medication carts 1 and 2 This failure had the potential to result in loss, misuse, and accountability for controlled substances. Findings: Review of the facility's forms for controlled substances count for every shift Narcotic Sign-off Sheet (to maintain adequate control and accountability for controlled substances) for the period from 1/31/23 to 3/7/23 (total of 36 days, or 108 shifts) indicated, license nurse's initials were left blank for thirty-one times for medication cart 1. During an interview and concurrent record review with the license vocational nurse B (LVN B) on 3/8/23 at 9:00 a.m., LVN B acknowledged there were several missing nurse's initials for narcotic sign-off sheets. She further stated nurses should have initialed each time when they counted narcotic medications at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. There were opened undated, unlabeled, and outdated food items in the reach-in refrigerator and dry storage areas; 2. Pans and plastic containers used for food preparation and food service were stacked and stored wet; 3. Kitchen staff did not know the proper procedures for testing chlorine (chemical) sanitizer used for dishwashing; 4. The dishwasher sanitizing log was not completed; 5. There were no logs recording weekly calibration of thermometers; 6. The temperature of a food item on the steam table was not checked prior to serving during lunch; 7. A scoop was left inside the flour container; 8. There were dented cans of food in the dry storage area; 9. Open bags of food items were not sealed or closed in the walk-in freezer; and, 10. There were opened undated and outdated food items in the food preparation area. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention protocols were followed during multiple occasions, when 1. hand hygiene was not performed between glove changes during wound care, 2. proper PPE (personal protective equipment, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) was not worn inside of an isolation room, and 3. hand hygiene was not used during medication pass. These failures had the potential of causing personal and wide spread infections, compromising the health and well-being of all residents and staff in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation and subsequent interview on 3/8/23 at 2:06 p.m., with licensed vocational nurse B (LVN B), while changing a wound dressing on the right posterior thigh/gluteal border MASD (moisture associated skin damage) of Resident 1, LVN B put on gloves and removed the dressing, then changed gloves without using any form of hand hygiene. LVN B cleaned the wound with normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride), then changed gloves,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) on medications self-administration (residents take medications without staff assistance) and bed side medications storage for two out of 12 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 231) when (a) the facility did not determine that residents were clinically appropriate and safe to self-administer medications, (b) the facility did not ensure self-administered medications were stored in a safe and secure place, and (c)The facility did not obtain a physician order to store medications at bedside. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe medication self-administration. These failures also had the potential to result in other residents gaining unapproved access to the medications. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 1/6/2023, indicated she had a brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the admission baseline care plan for one of 12 residents (Resident 10) was developed in a timely manner, when Resident 10's baseline care plan was not developed within 48 hours of their admission. This failure had the potential of the resident not getting the care she needed and thus having a negative impact on their health and well-being. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE], during the day, with diagnoses which included sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection), pleural effusion (a buildup of fluid between the layers of tissue that line the lungs and chest cavity), acute kidney failure, fracture of medial condyle (located on the inside part of the knee) of left femur (upper leg bone), and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). During a review of Resident 10's care plans, her baseline care plan was not started until 3/25/22, while her admission was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement person centered and individualized care plans for three out of seventeen sampled residents (Resident 16, 329, and 19) when: 1. Resident 16 had a fall; 2. Resident 329 had a fall and an allegation of abuse, and 3. For Resident 19 there was no care developed after a fall. These failures may delay the implementation of the interventions, identification of specific care areas and services to meet the resident's needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 16's clinical record review indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infraction (a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain), cirrhosis of liver (a disease in which healthy liver tissue replaced with scar tissue and the liver permanently damaged), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular and often fast heart rate), and malignant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for one of three residents (Resident 25) when: Resident 25's room air oxygen concentrator (RAOC-a machine takes room air and passes it through the filtering system in the machine and converts it to more pure oxygen) was set to deliver oxygen flow at a rate of 3.5 liters per minute (L/min, oxygen flowing into nostrils over a period of one minute) via nasal cannula when Resident 25 had an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 25's health and well - being, and not meeting the resident's therapeutic needs or excessive use of oxygen. Findings: Clinical record review indicated Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (a disease or injury affects breathing), pleural effusion (buildup of fluid between the layers of tissue that line the lungs and chest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of five residents (Residents 12 and 279) were free from unnecessary medication when: 1. Resident 12 had physician orders which did not have an indication for the use of Risperdal, a psychotropic (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medication, there was no monitoring of her behaviors, and there was no informed consent for the Risperdal. 2. Resident 279 had physician orders which did not have an indication for the use of Seroquel, there was no monitoring of her behaviors, and there was no informed consent for the Seroquel. These failures had the potential of residents receiving psychotropic medications without a need for them. Findings: 1. Resident 12 was admitted with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), delirium (a serious change in mental abilities resulting in confused thinking and a lack of awareness of someone's surroundings), and anxiety disorder. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater when observation of 30 opportunities during the medication administration resulted in two errors (both for Resident 15). The calculation of medication error rate was 6.67 percent. These failures placed Resident 15 at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effects of medications when medications were not given according to physician's orders. Findings: Clinical review of Resident 15 indicated, the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infraction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery (medical condition that occurs when blood flow from the largest artery of the brain suddenly disrupted), chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), congestive heart failure (a serious condition in which the heart does not pump blood as efficiently as it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medication when: One opened and undated tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD- a solution used for tuberculin skin test) multi-dose vial was observed in the refrigerator in the medication storage room; This failure had the potential for residents to receive a PPD skin test with reduced potency due to the drug to be potentially past its use-by-date. Finding: During medication room observation and concurrent interview with the interim director of nursing (IDON) on [DATE] at 12:09 p.m., a one fourth full vial of clear solution of PPD multi-dose was opened and undated in refrigerator in the medication storage room. The IDON confirmed this observation. She further stated nursing staff should have labeled the vial with the date for when it was opened. During a phone interview with the facility's consultant pharmacist (CP) on [DATE] at 10:22 a.m., the CP stated nursing staff should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.9≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HUMANGOOD NORCALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/1967
U.S. BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
BAKER, JUDITHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/25/2012
BATTISON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/03/2011
BROWN, HERMANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/10/2013
CHRISTOPHERSON, JOANNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/20/2025
FELLER, IRENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/26/2021
GRIFFITH, ALANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/30/2019
HOLMES, MICHELLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2016
KELLEY, ALBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/21/2008
ROTH, SHARONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/08/2018
COCHRANE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/10/2009
GHASSEMI, BETHANYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/21/2019
MCDONALD, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
OGUS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/27/2009
HUMANGOOD SOCALOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1967
GONZALES, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/25/2022
HAGGERTY, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2024
OKUMU, JACQUELINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/23/2026
SKRYPKAR, ANDRIIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
VANGELISTO, GWENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/30/2021
BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2025
BAKER TILLY US LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2024
HUMANGOODOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1967
WASHINGTON FEDERALOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/27/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$25.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 7%Other / private 93%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$364per resident / day
operating cost
$11,070per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055210. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next