Summitview Rehab And Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 54.0 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.54 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.39 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls with injury, was provided adequate supervision to prevent accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were left alone on the toilet and found on the bathroom floor after an unknown amount of time. The fall resulted in a forehead hematoma (a pooling of blood in the surrounding tissues after an injury to the blood vessels) with bleeding, and transfer to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a brain bleed. Failure to identify residents that need supervision while on the toilet put residents at risk for injuries and diminished quality of health. Findings included .Review of Resident 1's medical record showed that they were admitted on [DATE] after a stroke (a medical emergency occurring when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked or a blood vessel bursts). Review of the 01/20/2026 comprehensive assessment showed that they had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent injuries or falls, during resident transfers (helping residents move safely from one place to another) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 4) reviewed for falls or injuries acquired during transfers by staff. Resident 1 experienced harm when the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as determined necessary by the comprehensive care plan, during a transfer from the resident's bed to wheelchair, resulting in pain and ankle fractures and put residents that require transfer assistance at risk for injury. Findings included Record review of the facility's policy titled, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated 07/2017, showed that a resident's safety will be incorporated into the goals and decisions regarding the safe moving of residents; Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, shall assess individual residents' need for transfer assistance. Staff will document resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent facility acquired pressure injury (PI) and worsening of PIs for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 49, and 18) reviewed for PIs. Resident 49 experienced harm when they developed a stage 4 medical device-related PI (MDRPI) to their right lower leg from an immobilization brace (a rigid medical device that holds a joint or bone in place to aid in restricting movement of the injured area to assist with healing) that became infected and resulted in extreme pain. Resident 18 experienced harm when they developed a right buttock PI that worsened, became infected, and required antibiotic treatment. These failures placed residents at risk for medical complications, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel's (NPIAP, the leading expert in PIs/wounds) guidelines and definitions, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified care in a manner and in an environment that enhanced dignity and quality of life for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 2, 5, 7 and 28) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs and a poor quality of life. Findings included. Record review of a facility policy titled, Dignity, dated 02/2021 showed .Residents are always treated with respect and dignity.Residents are provided with a dignified dining experience.Staff protect confidential clinical information, and verbal communication is kept outside the hearing of other residents or the public. Resident 2 Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included a history of stroke (blood flow to the brain is blocked causing lack of oxygen to brain tissue), dementia (a decline in mental ability that interferes with daily life) and depression. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Power of Attorney (POA), was fully informed of the admission agreement to include payment for services and co-payment requirements for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 43) reviewed for admission to the facility. This failure placed the resident/POA at risk for the inability to make informed decisions regarding the resident's health care, alternative treatments and the right to refuse care/services. Findings included. Resident 43Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a post-operative diagnosis of a fractured left shoulder with a shoulder joint replacement. Other diagnoses included depression and delirium (a state of confusion, memory issues related to a medical or psychological condition). The 05/05/2026 nursing admission assessment showed the resident had cognitive impairment and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for transfers. Review of the 05/04/2026 Social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had a serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) had the required Level 2 PASARR referral sent when a resident had a positive Level 1 PASARR and was in the facility more than 30 days for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 10) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs.Findings included.Review of the medical record showed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that affects movement and balance), syncopal episodes (fainting or a loss of blood flow to the brain leading to loss of consciousness) and depression. The 04/09/2026 comprehensive assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement documentation/monitoring of depression symptoms per the comprehensive resident centered care plan and honor resident preferences with nighttime routines for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 38) reviewed for care plan implementation. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified mental health symptoms and unmet care needs.Findings included .Review of the medical record showed Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a fracture to the left leg, respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs fail to provide adequate oxygen to the rest of the body), lung infection and protein calorie malnutrition (a form of undernutrition, caused by not eating enough protein/calories, leading to muscle/fat loss and impaired bodily functions). The 04/23/2026 comprehensive evaluation showed the resident was cognitively intact, able to make their needs known and required assistance from one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the nature/terms of entering into a binding arbitration agreement (an alternative means of settling disputes through a third party arbitrator, instead of traditional court/judicial systems) were explained to residents in a form and manner in which they could understand for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 11 and 5) reviewed for arbitration. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of understanding concerning the legal contract that had been signed/entered into and being fully informed regarding their choice in the event of a dispute with the facility.Findings included.Resident 11Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including multiple respiratory complications, stroke (a complication when blood supply to the brain is blocked or reduced which can lead to brain damage), altered mental status (a change in mental function from various illnesses, disorders, or injures affecting the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control interventions intended to mitigate the risk for transmission of infections were consistently implemented in the areas of hand hygiene (HH) for 1 of 2 dining rooms (DR 1 and Transmission Based Precautions ([TBP] specialized infection control measures used in health care settings alongside basic standard precautions) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for infection control practices. This failure placed the residents at risk for transmission of communicable diseases, and illness. Findings included. Hand Hygiene During an observation on 05/18/2026 at 11:36 AM, Staff P, Dietary, was in DR 1 with gloves on. Staff P touched resident wheelchairs to assist them to their tables, repositioned them, placed shirt protectors on the residents and touched multiple surfaces. Staff P, without performing HH or changing their gloves, proceeded to make drinks and serve them to the residents who were seated in the dining room. During an observation on 05/18/2026 at 11:46 AM, Staff P, still…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food at the proper temperatures, appetizing and palatable to taste for 4 of 7 residents (Resident 20, 25, 42, and 43) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses, a decreased nutritional intake, and potential for weight loss. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Food Safety, showed food would be served in such a way as to prevent bacterial growth and served immediately. Additionally, to provide food that is fresh at the proper temperature to keep food safe, wholesome and appetizing. <Resident 20> During an interview on 04/16/2025 at 11:07 AM Resident 20 stated that they were served eggs daily in their room for breakfast, which were cold, and they are unable to eat them. <Resident 25> During an interview on 04/16/2025 at 11:10 AM Resident 25 stated that the food served was sometimes cold and reported this to the staff. <Resident 42> During an interview on 04/16/2025 at 11:15 AM Resident 42 stated that the meal service was too…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were maintained by not performing hand hygiene and glove changes between dirty and clean tasks for 3 of 4 staff (Staff R, T and Q) reviewed during resident cares and dining. This failed practice placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of infections) and the development of communicable diseases. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy dated August 2019, titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene showed the facility considered hand hygiene the primary means (define or source/action/infection preventions) for preventing the spread of infections. <Dining> An observation on 04/14/2025 at 11:58 AM, showed Staff R, Nursing Assistant, grabbed Resident 35's spoon and assisted the resident with a bite of food without performing hand hygiene. Staff R then grabbed an unidentified resident's napkin, wiped the unidentified resident's face and then placed the napkin in their hand. Staff R then proceeded to assist Resident 35…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to choose important aspects of their life including frequency and type of bathing preferences for 2 of 3 residents (Residents19 and 29) reviewed for choices. This failure to honor resident choices placed the residents at risk for impaired hygiene and feelings of embarrassment. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Resident Rights, revised on 02/2021, showed the resident has the right to self-determination and be supported by the facility when exercising their rights. <Resident 19> Review of the medical record showed Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), pressure ulcer (a wound that develops when constant pressure on the skin restricts blood flow to the area, leading to tissue damage), and chronic pain. The 01/31/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 19 was dependent on one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum requirements of resident specific goals, physician orders, dietary orders, treatment plans and social service needs for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 29, 208, and 258) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services, and a continuity of care. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans-Baseline, revised March 2022, showed a baseline plan of care would be developed within 48 hours of admission to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs. The baseline care plan would include effective, person-centered care of the residents and contain the minimum healthcare to include initial goals based on admission orders, discussion with residents/representatives, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. <Resident 29> Review of the medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$194,266 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-03-24
• $91,985 — penalty dated 2025-01-24
• $86,346 — penalty dated 2024-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $297K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA