Las Ventanas Retirement Comm SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 392 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 184 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.55 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.19 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.64 to 1.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advanced directive was accurately documented in the medical record for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 37). The deficient practice had the potential to result in administration of unwanted life-sustaining treatment against the resident's expressed wishes. Findings include: Resident 37 (R37) R37 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. R37's electronic medical record documented Full Code, medical interventions included full treatment, long term artificial nutrition or feeding tube. A Physician order dated [DATE], documented admit to hospice with primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm. A Care Plan initiated [DATE], documented R37 was on hospice care. Interventions included to respect resident wishes. A Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the insertion of an intravenous (IV) line and for the care and monitoring of the IV site for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident #116). The deficient practice had the potential to significantly increase the resident's risk of serious complications such as bloodstream infection, phlebitis, infiltration, and sepsis.Findings include:Resident #116 (R116)R116 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, acute kidney failure, and venous insufficiency.On 06/24/2025 at 10:48 AM, an intravenous (IV) line was observed in R116's right arm. The IV line had a dressing dated 06/15/2025. R116 verbalized the IV site was painful and stated it had been used for iron administration, which had been completed two days ago. Resident 116 reported informing the nurse to remove the IV; however, it remained in place at the time of observation.Physician order dated 06/14/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure an air intake cabinet filter was installed in an oxygen concentrator prior to being used for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #102). The deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of the oxygen delivered, placing the resident at risk for exacerbation of preexisting respiratory conditions or exposing the resident to environment contaminants.Findings included:Resident #102 (R102) R102 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic kidney disease, recurrent UTIs, history of obstructive uropathy.A physician order dated June 14, 2025 at 6:00 PM, documented the administration of oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift for the treatment of hypoxia.06/25/25 at 11:00 AM, R102 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen). The concentrator did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to obtain consents for the administration of psychoactive medications, develop a care plan, and monitor target behaviors and side effects related to the administration of psychoactive medications for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #101). The deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the resident's health, safety, and well-being by failing to identify possible adverse drug reactions, behavioral deterioration, or ineffective treatment. Findings include: Resident #101 (R101) R101 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy secondary to urinary tract infection, short-term memory loss and cognitive impairment. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a standardized, federally mandated tool used in nursing homes and long-term care facilities to evaluate the clinical, functional, and psychosocial status of residents) dated 06/11/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a short,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an insulin pen was not left unattended in a resident's room and failed to maintain a medication storage room free of expired medication. The deficient practice had the potential to compromise resident safety by exposing the residents to the risk of using expired or improperly stored medications and allowing for possible misuse of unattended insulin pens.Findings included:On [DATE] at 3:20 PM, a Glargine insulin pen containing medication was discovered on the overbed meal table in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed the observation and acknowledged the insulin pen had been left unattended, posing a potential safety risk to the resident and others in the unit. On [DATE], at 3:40 PM, the Charge Nurse was notified about the Glargine insulin pen found in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Charge Nurse confirmed the medication belonged to the resident assigned to room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #102) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control practices by wearing required personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 32). The deficient practice had the potential to contribute to the transmission of infections to other residents. Findings include: Resident 32 (R32) R32 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], with diagnosis including acute embolism and thrombosis of right popliteal vein, acute embolism and thrombosis of right tibial vein, and urinary tract infection. A Physician order dated 06/20/2025, documented contact isolation precautions for Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) (an enzyme produced by certain bacteria) Klebsiella Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). On 06/24/2025 at 8:44 AM, a contact precautions sign was observed posted next to R32's room door. The contact precautions sign indicated providers, and staff must wear PPE including a gown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration medication assessment, care plan, physician's orders, and a safe storage area was completed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice had a potential for a resident not to be properly evaluated if able to safely self-administer a nasal spray medication. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and age-related osteoporosis. On 01/02/2025 at 8:49 AM, a container of saline nasal spray was on R3's overbed tray table. R3 confirmed self-administered the saline nasal spray for when their nose was dry from the oxygen cannula. R3 indicated the saline nasal spray was on overbed tray table to self-administer as needed. On 01/02/2025 at 9:04 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed resident had a Saline Nasal spray, and there was no physician's order for the Saline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided supervision during medication administration for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice had the potential to place a resident at risk of an accident. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and age-related osteoporosis. On 01/02/2025 at 8:49 AM, the following was on R3's overbed tray table: - a clear plastic medication cup with one white oval tablet - a clear plastic medication cup of 9 various tablets R3 verbalized the nurse had left the oral medications with the resident to take at 9:00 AM. On 01/02/2025 at 9:04 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) verbalized R3 was given their 9:00 AM medications, and the LPN had stepped out of the resident's room to get something from the medication cart before returning to observe the resident take the medication. The LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in; 1) 1 of 2 central supply rooms on the first floor which contained wound care supplies and 2) 1 of 3 sampled resident's room (Resident 3). The deficient practice had the potential risk of unauthorized access to medications, medication errors, theft, or misuse of medication within the facility. Findings include: 1. Unsecured Wound care Supplies in a Supply Room On 01/02/2025 at 7:40 AM, the central supply room door was open, the lights were on, and no staff members were in the supply room. The supply room contained wound care supplies. On 01/02/2025 at 8:17 AM, the central supply room door was open, the lights were on and no staff members in the supply room. The following unsecured wound care supplies were located on the shelves in the central supply room: -16-ounce bottles of Dakin's solution (a topical antiseptic) -16-ounce bottles of Hydrogen Peroxide (a topical antiseptic) -Petroleum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident's family were informed about the resident being placed on isolation (transmission-based precautions) upon admission for 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 46). The deficient practice had the potential for the facility not respecting the rights of the resident to be fully informed about their treatment. Findings include: Resident 46 (R46) R46 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy and abnormal findings of blood chemistry. On 07/09/2024 at 12:17 PM, R46's family member indicated nobody explained to the resident and resident's family about R46 being on isolation upon admission. The family member revealed nobody from the facility explained why the resident was on isolation. The family member confirmed R46 had tested negative for COVID-19. R46's Face Sheet (demographics) documented the family member was the resident's emergency contact and next of kin. R46's medical record lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HUMANGOOD — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $561K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV