Palms Care Center
1010 Ventura Avenue, Chowchilla, CA 93610 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 65 certified beds · (559) 665-4826 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 50.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.56 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.06 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.9%CMS range 35.6–63.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.7–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.6%CMS range 6.5–16.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2021-11-10 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of five Residents (Residents 6, 8, 11, 16, and 55) were assessed for the risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard (raised) or lowered) prior to installation and had no consent (form signed by resident or family explaining the risks of side rail use), physician order, indication for use, and care plans prior to the use of side rails when: 1. Resident 6 had two bed rails raised up and had sustained an injury of unknown origin on 10/29/2021 prompting the facility to pad the bed rails. Prior to the use of the two bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment; no consent, physician order and care plan were done prior to the use of the two bed rails for Resident 6. 2. Resident 16 had two bed rails on both sides of the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a history of aggressive behavior towards other residents and staff did not implement interventions to protect other residents. On 7/12/24 Resident 1 was left unattended in the dining room. Resident 1 hit Resident 2 with a closed fist to his left hand. Resident 1 had a care plan intervention for one on one (1:1-constant observation for safety of residents) supervision. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being supervised in the dining room and striking Resident 2 on his left hand, causing injuries to Resident 2 ' s left hand that required treatment for a skin tear (a wound that is caused by direct contact between the skin and another object) and bleeding to his left hand. Finding: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 7/30/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing information contained all required information when the total number of hours and actual hours worked by Registered Nurse (RN)s, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) s, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)s, and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)s were not separated, and was not posted in a prominent readily accessible location to 60 out of 60 residents and visitors. This failure resulted in restricted public access to posted nurse staffing information for 60 out of 60 residents admitted within the facility which had the potential to result in residents not knowing how many direct care hours were provided daily. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/3/25 at 1:54 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's document titled Daily Nurse Staffing , dated 4/3/25 was reviewed. The facility's daily nurse staffing document indicated, .Total Hands on PPD (Per Patient Day) . 3.7 [hours] .Total Hours 222 [hours] .Divided by total census 60 . The DSD could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for three of 14 sampled residents (Resident 28, 37, 41) when: 1. Resident 37's CP did not address Resident 37's preference to maintain an ileostomy (is a surgical procedure where the end of the small intestine (ileum is brought through an opening in the abdomen (stoma) to allow waste to exit the body through a bag instead of the anus) and to manage the associated risk. This failure placed Resident 37 at risk for stoma complications and not to honor residents' choice while ensuring proper care. 2. Resident 41's CP was not developed to address the ongoing medication refusal. This failure had the potential for resident 41 to experience severe and serious medical complications. 3. Resident 28 did not have an individualized care plan for self-harm indicated by pulling dried skin and scabs off her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained for 7 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 4, 9, 10, 22, 48, 50, and 261), when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and LVN 2 did not perform hand hygiene [cleaning hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based rub (ABHR)] between Resident 10, 22, 48, 50, and 261 during medication administration. This failure had increased risk of cross-contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effects) and the spread of infection. 2. Resident 4's oxygen nasal cannula (O2 NC- a tube that directs oxygen into the nose) tubing was observed not in a protective bag on top of the oxygen concentrator (medical device that supplies oxygen-enriched air to help people breathe easier). This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of 11 sampled residents (Resident 28 and Resident 57) when: 1. Resident 28 sustained wounds due to continued itching and picking (pulling off dried skin and scabs) from her wounds on her right, left arms and right shoulder and Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN)s did not notify the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 28 having open, bleeding and unhealing wounds which put Resident 28 at risk for infection and continued discomfort. 2. Resident 57's oxygen therapy (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) was not administered per the physician order. This failure resulted in Resident 57 not receiving his oxygen therapy as ordered which had the potential to result in nasal dryness, shortness of breath, oxygen toxicity, and serious medical condition. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 261) was provided activities that met his preferences and interests to support mental and psychosocial well-being when Resident 261's developed activities did not match his interests or preference to write, draw or color. This failure had the potential for Resident 261 to result in isolation and decreased engagement in activities. Findings: During a review of Resident 261's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 4/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 261 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included, .Convulsions (rapid, involuntary muscle contractions that cause uncontrollable shaking and limb movement) .hypertension (high blood pressure) and muscle weakness . During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian (RD) offered adequate consultation to support food and nutrition services, residents' assessments and the development of individualized care plans for one of six sampled residents (Resident 39), when RD did not follow up with weight changes for Resident 39. This failure had the potential to cause reduced quality of life and risk of weight loss, dehydration and delayed wound healing. Findings: During an interview on 4/1/25 at 9:22 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM stated the Registered Dietitian (RD) was not onsite. CDM stated RD typically worked on Saturdays. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 9:11 a.m. with Kitchen Staff (KS) 1, KS 1 stated the RD did not do staff training; it was done by the CDM. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 2:51p.m. with the CDM, the CDM stated she was responsible for the day -to-day operations, ordering, and tray line audits. The CDM stated the RD conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records in accordance with professional standards of practices were maintained for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 28), when the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) was not accurate and complete. This failure had the potential for Resident 28's decisions regarding treatment options and end of life wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:22 a.m. with Resident 28 in Resident 28's room, Resident 28 was observed dressed in bed. Resident 28 could not state how she was doing. Resident 28 stated she had been at the facility for four to five weeks. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of six sampled residents (Resident 4 and 9) when call lights were observed on the floor and tucked in bedside drawers out of resident reach. These failures had the potential for Resident 4 and 9 to have delayed medical attention, increased risk of falls, prolonged discomfort or pain, feelings of isolation and anxiety (feeling of worry or nervousness), and in severe cases, life-threatening situations. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes) dated 5/23/24, the AR indicated, Resident 4 was readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of: congestive heart failure (CHF- a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), diabetes mellitus ( DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to hire a qualified Dietary Manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for 56 of 61 residents who receive food from the kitchen when the dietary supervisor did not meet the minimum qualifications for the role. This failure had the potential to affect the nutrition status and health of 56 of 61 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: During an interview on 4/16/24 at 10:58 a.m., with the DM, the DM stated she was still in school to become a certified dietary manager. The DM stated she had not yet fully completed her schooling and training. The DM stated she was not certified as of 4/16/24. The DM stated she was unsure if she met the requirements for the dietary manager role. During an interview on 4/18/24 at 2:28 p.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated the person hired as the dietary manager should have been certified. The RD stated the current DM was not certified for the role. The RD stated it was important to have a certified dietary manager in order to uphold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe preparation, distribution, and storage practices were followed in the kitchen for 56 of 61 residents in accordance with facility policy and procedure and the US Food Code when: 1. The top of the dish washer had crumbs, dust, and was covered in a white residue (material that gets leftover after not being cleaned for some time). 2. The cooking surface of three of seven pans was cracked and peeling. 3. The walk-in freezer had a large icicle (hanging piece of ice that grows as water drips). 4. Oven mitts were torn at the tip and the inside fabric was exposed. These failures had the potential to attract pests, contaminate residents' food, and cause foodborne illnesses to 56 of 61 sampled residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/14/24 at 9:33 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) in the kitchen, the top of the dishwasher was covered with dirt, crumbs, and white residue. The DS stated the top of the dishwasher should have been cleaned.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for three of eight sampled residents (Residents 8, 11 and 57) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 failed to follow facility's procedure on Proper Inhalation Technique for Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI-small, hand-held device filled with medicine to treat breathing problem) when she administered MDI medication to Residents 11 and 8. This failure had the potential for Residents 8 and 11 to suffer from respiratory infection which could lead to serious health condition. 2. Licensed Nurses (LNs) were signing the Electronic Treatment Administration (eTAR- electronic version of standard paper treatment administration record) on Resident 57's order for splint/orthotic device (support to an injured or weakened body part) from 4/1/24- 4/17/24 and not following the treatment order on how the splint/orthotic device was to be applied to Resident 57. This failure had the potential for Resident 57 to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician Informed Consent (the process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of psychoactive medications) for the use of psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions, and behavior) was obtained for one of six sampled residents (Resident 26) when Resident 26 was administered quetiapine fumarate and risperidone (medications used to treat anxiety [intense excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations]) on 3/26/24 to 4/8/24 and informed consent was not obtained prior to medication administration. These failures resulted in Resident 26 to be administered psychotropic medications and not be fully informed of the risk and benefits and did not have the knowledge to make an informed decision which placed Resident 26 at a potential risk for negative side effects. Findings: During an observation on 4/15/24, at 12:25 p.m. in the dining room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident's rights for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 12), when Resident 12 was not informed or allowed to decline plan of care. Resident 12 was placed on a low air loss mattress (LAL-enhancing circulation and reducing prolonged pressure in one area) that was contraindicated for fitted sheets and resident's request for fitted sheets was not addressed. This failure resulted in Resident 12 feeling frustrated, ignored, disrespected and physically uncomfortable when she was not allowed to have fitted sheets on her mattress. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission record (AR- document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information) dated 4/17/24, the AR indicated Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Injury of the Cervical (cervical- uppermost region) Spinal Cord, major depressive order (persistently low or depressed mood, decreased interest in pleasurable activities, feelings of guilt or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 45), when Resident 45's room had chipped, missing and peeling paint on the walls of the bathroom and mirror. This failure had the potential for Resident 45 to not have living space in a homelike environment and possibly feeling depressed. Findings: During a review of the Resident 45's admission Record (AR- document with resident information), dated 4/17/24, the AR indicated Resident 45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of malnutrition (not getting enough nutrients for body to thrive), and anxiety disorder (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During a review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive [mental processes] and physical functional level assessment), dated 3/30/24, the MDS section C indicated Resident 4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a test given by medical professionals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment ((MDS -assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 57) when Resident 57's functional limitation in range of motion was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 57's care needs not being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/15/4, at 10:20 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 57 was lying in bed and observed with right sided weakness. Resident 57 stated he was not able to move his right arm and right leg and used his left hand to move his right arm and right leg. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 4/18/24, indicated Resident 57 was admitted in the facility on 1/30/24 with diagnoses which included cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 57) when Resident 57 was administered apixaban (anticoagulant-blood thinner) medication for atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly caused poor blood flow and blood clot formation) and the facility did not initiate a care plan for apixaban. This failure placed Resident 57 at a potential risk for use of anticoagulant needs not met. Findings: During a concurrent observation, and interview on 4/15/24, at 10:20 a.m. in Resident 57's room, Resident 57 was lying down in his bed. Resident 57 stated he was not able to move the right side of his body and needed assistance with his care. Resident 57 stated he wanted to get stronger so he can go home to his ranch but needed someone to take care of him. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 4/18/24, indicated Resident 57 was admitted in the facility on 1/30/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 did not lock her medication cart and went inside a resident room to administer medication. This failure had the potential for residents, staff, and visitors to have access to the unlocked medication cart. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 4/18/24, indicated Resident 12 was re-admitted in the facility on 9/2/22 with diagnoses which included asthma (difficulty breathing), quadriplegia (weakness of upper and lower body) and heart failure. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/16/24, at 12:06 a.m. during medication pass observation in south wing hallway. LVN 6 observed preparing medications for Resident 12, after LVN 6 prepared Resident 12, she turned her back on her medication cart, did not locked the medication cart and went inside Resident 12's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent infection for one of three sampled residents (Resident 40) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7 failed to sanitize (disinfect) the blood pressure cuff (device used to measure the pressure of blood in the circulatory system), stethoscope (device used to listen to internal sounds of a human body or an animal) after use and did not wash her hands after checking the blood pressure of Resident 40. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect) and transmission of infection between residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/16/24, at 4:05 p.m. in the east wing hallway by Resident 40's room, LVN 7 was passing medications. LVN 7 checked Resident 40's blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 3 and Resident 4) when Residents were not educated on oxygen safety precautions. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being burned from when her oxygen tubing caught fire and had potential for Resident 3 and 4 being burnt. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated October 11, 2023, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (condition in which kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), heart failure (condition that develops when the heart does not pump enough blood for the body's needs), and chronic ulcer (an open sore) of lower leg. Resident 1 required staff assistance for activities of daily living. During a review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide care and services to ensure residents received the needed care to attain and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for five of six sampled residents (Residents 3, 10, 18, 19 and 20) when residents' needs, preferences, and accommodations were communicated to staff, and staff did not respond in a timely manner. These failures resulted in Residents 3, 10, 18, 19 and 20's needs not being met. Findings: During an interview on 11/2/21, at 2:56 p.m., with Resident 10, Resident 10 stated, the facility was understaffed and would call for assistance which took up to an hour for staff to respond. During an interview on 11/2/21, at 3:37 p.m., Resident 18's responsible party (RP), RP stated, she couldn't remember how long ago it was that Resident 18 was not showered by staff for one and a half weeks. During an interview on 11/3/21, at 9:19 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7, CNA 7 stated, the facility had problems keeping staff since COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/21 at 2:26 p.m., with Resident 32, in Resident 32's room, Resident 32 was laying in bed with the catheter bag touching the ground. Resident 32 stated, after lunch the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) emptied his catheter bag. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/21, at 2:35 p.m., with CNA 6, in Resident 32's room, Resident 32's catheter bag was touching the ground. CNA 6 stated, the catheter bag should not be on the ground because there was a risk for infection and cross contamination. During a review of Resident 32's Care Plan, dated 11/2/21, the Care plan indicated, .Alteration in elimination of bowel and bladder .Keep drainage bag of catheter below the level of the bladder at all times and off floor . During concurrent interview and record review on 11/3/21, at 3:46 p.m., with the DON, the facility policy and procedure titled Catheter-Care of dated 6/2020 indicted, .Take care to ensure the collection bag does not touch the floor at any time . The DON stated, the catheter bag should not touch the ground at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when two spices were expired, one applesauce container was not labeled and did not contain the use by date (last date recommended for the use of a product while at peak quality). These food items were available in the kitchen for use to prepare food for 57 out of 57 residents. This failure placed 57 residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (illnesses caused by consuming contaminated food or drink) from consuming potentially contaminated food (unclean) and exposure to harmful pathogens (bacteria or viruses that can cause illness) and decrease palatability of the food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/21, at 11:13 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the refrigerator had a small container of applesauce that had the open date of 10/30/21 and due date of 11/1/21. The DS stated the applesauce should not be used after the written date on the container. The DS threw away the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-10 · tag F0813 — widespreadHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure allowing residents to have outside food brought in by the family and/or visitors ensuring sanitary and safe food storage for six of six sampled residents (18, 19, 35, and 51) when residents were informed, they were not allowed to store and/or reheat prepared food brought to them by family. This failure had the potential for unsafe and unsanitary food storage and handling brought from outside for later consumption and placed Residents 18, 19. 35 and 51at high risk for food borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/02/21, at 3:37 p.m., with Resident 18 and Resident 18's Responsible Party (RP) 2, RP 2 brought in carrot cake. Resident 18's RP 2 stated food could be brought in for Resident 18, if eaten during the visit. Resident 18's RP 2 stated there was no refrigerator to store foods brought from home. During Resident Council Meeting (an organized group of residents who meet regularly to discuss concerns about their rights) and interviews on 11/03/21, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility's Administrator (ADM) failed to ensure effective oversight and necessary resources to ensure resident care services were met to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident when the ADM did not provide oversight to the facility's day to day operations when: 1. The facility failed to ensure five of five Residents (Residents 6, 8, 11, 16, and 55) were assessed for the risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard (raised) or lowered) prior to installation and had no consent (form signed by resident or family explaining the risks of side rail use), physician order, indication for use, and care plans prior to the use of side rails. These failures had the potential to cause entrapment, serious harm, injury, or death to Residents 6, 8, 11, 16, and 55. (Cross reference F700). 2. Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1.One of three sampled residents (Resident 27's) gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach. The tube allows patients to receive nutrition directly through stomach) gravity bag (gravity feeding is a way to deliver feeding formula through the feeding tube. With this feeding method, formula flows out of a bag and into the tube by gravity) lid was left open when the feeding formula was being administered. This failure had the potential to result in Cross contamination for Resident 27. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant did not disinfect the mechanical lift (used to move patients who are unable to stand on their own or whose weight makes it unsafe to move or lift them manually) in between used for Resident 3, Resident 41 and Resident 20. These failures placed Resident 3, 41 and 20 at risk for cross contamination. 3. The facility lobby door was left unlocked, with access to anyone to enter the facility without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-10 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP-professional who ensures healthcare workers and patients are doing all the things they should to prevent infections) completed the specialized training for IP certification program in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) guidelines. This failure resulted in the IP not meeting the qualifications that would ensure residents were provided with quality care to prevent or minimize the transmission or spread of COVID-19 (a contagious serious respiratory infection transmitted from person to person) and/or other infections to all residents and staff. Findings: During an interview on 11/10/21 at 2:08 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated she does not have an IP certification and was in the process of getting certified. The IP stated the Administrator (ADM) was aware she does not have an IP certification. During an interview on 11/10/21, at 4:43 p.m., with the ADM, the ADM stated she was aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure emergency exit routes must be clear and unblocked to allow quick and safe exit for facility residents, staff and visitors in case of an emergency when mechanical lifts, wheelchairs, shower beds where stored in front of the emergency exit doors in the hallway. This failure had the potential to create delay, panic, and confusion to residents, staff, and visitors in case of an emergency. Findings: During an observation on 11/3/21, at 8:55 a.m., in the hallway the mechanical lift was stored in front of the emergency exit door. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/3/21, at 9 a.m., with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) in the hallway, the DOM verified the mechanical lift was stored in front of the emergency door and was blocking the emergency exit door. The DOM stated the emergency exit door should be unblocked. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/3/21, at 3:02 p.m., with License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 in the hallway, LVN 4 verified one shower chair, two wheelchair, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards of quality for three of 43 sampled residents (Resident 40, Resident 110, and Resident 56 .) when: 1. Resident 40 was administered oxygen without following physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 40 to receive a high dose of oxygen and had the potential to experience oxygen toxicity (a lung damage that happens from breathing too much (supplemental) oxygen. It can cause coughing and trouble breathing. In severe cases it can even cause death.) Which can lead to difficulty in breathing and death. 2. License Vocational Nurse administered insulin by way of an insulin pen to Resident 110 and Resident 56 without disinfecting the insulin pen rubber seal, did not prime (a method to remove air bubbles from the needle to ensure it is working, and full dose administration) the pen, and did not hold the pen at the injection site for 5-10 seconds prior to pulling the needle out. This failure placed Resident 110 and Resident 56 at risk for an inaccurate insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent when the facility medication error rate was 16 percent when 25 opportunities of medication administration were observed and four of the 25 medications were not administered in accordance with physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 12 percent. These failure placed Resident 110, and Resident 56 at risk for inaccurate insulin dosage and impaired insulin absorption (movement of a medication from the site of administration to bloodstream) and not getting the full therapeutic effects of all the administered medications. Findings: During a medication administration observation, on 11/04/21, at 10:09 a.m., in the hallway, with License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8, LVN 8 administered Sodium Bicarbonate (a medication use to relieve heartburn and acid indigestion) tablet 650 mg (milligrams - unit of measurement) one tablet, Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate (a medication use to treat infection) Tablet 500-125 mg one tablet, and NovoLOG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview, and Record Review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error for two of six sampled residents (Resident 110, and Resident 56) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8 administered Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate (a medication use to treat infection) not following physician's order administration time, and administered insulin (medication used to treat high blood sugar) by way of an insulin pen (a device used to inject insulin) to Resident 110 without priming prime (a method to remove air bubbles from the needle to ensure it is working, and provides insulin full dose administration) the insulin pen and without allowing the pen needle to remain under the skin for 5 to 10 seconds. 2. LVN 3 administered insulin by way of an insulin pen to Resident 56 without disinfecting the insulin pen rubber seal prior to attaching the needle, did not prime the insulin pen, and did not allow the pen needle to remain under the skin for 5 to 10 seconds. These failure placed Resident 110, and Resident 56 at risk for inaccurate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the privacy of personal information for one of 43 sampled residents (Resident 110) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8 did not close Resident 110's Electronic Health Record (EHR- are electronic versions of the paper charts. An EHR includes resident's medical history, notes, and other information about health including symptoms, diagnoses, medications, lab results, vital signs, immunizations, and reports from diagnostic tests). The EHR were left open, unattended and exposed for public viewing. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access to resident's personal information and violated Resident 110's right to privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During an observation on 11/4/21, at 9:54 a.m., in the hallway, Resident 110's EHR was left open and unattended. LVN 8 was inside the medication room. During an interview on 11/4/21, at 10 a.m., with LVN 8, LVN 8 verified Resident 110's EHR was left open and unattended in the hallway. LVN 8 stated Resident 110's EHR should not be left open and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and timely revise a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 18) when: 1. Resident 18's care plan for use of indwelling urinary catheter (IUC-a catheter drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside the body) was not reviewed or revised by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-group composed of a physician, a nurse and appointed facility staff who meet and discuss the care of the residents). This failure had the potential for Resident 18's to develop urinary tract infections (UTI-infection of the urinary tract) and not following his specific care needs for the IUC. Findings: During an interview on 11/03/21, at 2:03 p.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 9, LVN 9 stated Resident 18 had an IUC since admission and is diagnosed with obstructive uropathy (is a structural or functional hindrance of normal urine flow, sometimes leading to renal dysfunction). LVN 9 stated Resident 18's care plan was not personalized or revised since admission. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bowel and bladder training program was developed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 18) when Resident 18' s bowel and bladder (B&B) training program (a training program to overcome bladder problems) was not developed for the indwelling urinary catheter (IUC-a catheter drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body). This failure had the potential for Resident 18's to develop urinary tract infections (UTI-infection of the urinary tract) and loss of opportunity to regain bowel and bladder function. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 11/3/21, at 2:03 p.m., with LVN 9, Resident 18's electronic health record (EHR- are electronic versions of the paper charts. An EHR includes resident's medical history, notes, and other information about health including symptoms, diagnoses, medications, lab results, vital signs, immunizations, and reports from diagnostic tests) was reviewed. The EHR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enteral G-tube (Gastrostomy tube that is placed directly into the stomach for administration of food, fluids, and medications) feeding per physician order, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 42) when; Resident 42 did not have training to self-administer enteral feeding and administered an incorrect formula by adding water to his enteral feeding. This failure resulted in Resident 42 receiving more water than prescribed and had the potential to cause adverse complications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/21, at 12:12 p.m., with Resident 42, in Resident 42's room, Resident 42 stated, he had been a carpenter and was able to pick up on this quickly. Resident 42 stated, he had watched nurses do the enteral feeding a thousand times and was able to do it by himself. Resident stated he would demonstrate how he self-administered the enteral feeding via his G-tube. Resident 42 proceeded by opening the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice for one of 43 sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's artificial eye drops container was stored in the medication cart in the hallway without an open and used by date. These failures had the potential to result in the contamination, decreased efficacy of eye drops which placed Resident 2 at risk for decrease eye moisture and getting an eye infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/4/21, at 9:16 a.m., with License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, the medication cart stored Resident 2's artificial sterile eye drops. The eye drops had no open date and used by date (last date recommended for the use of a product while at peak quality) and was ready for Resident 2's use. LVN 2 stated the artificial sterile eye drop once open should have an open date and used by date to ensure medication potency and prevent eye infection. During an interview on 11/9/21 at 4:26 p.m., with the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the food service staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food service when one of seven dietary staff (Cook-CK 4) worked in the kitchen with an expired food handler card (FHC-proof of certification required of all food handlers in certain states within the United States. A food handler is defined as a person who works in a food facility and performs any duties that involve the preparation, storage or service of food in a facility). This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for unsafe food practices and handling which may lead to food borne illnesses (is any illness resulting from the spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 11/05/21, at 10:23 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), the [NAME] (CK) 4, DS, CK 1, Dietary Aide (DA) 1, CK 3, DA 2 and CK 2's FHCs were reviewed. CK 4's FHC was issued on 6/11/2018 and expired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective abuse training program for one of three employees (Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6) when employee training was not tracked, and employee did not complete the mandatory training necessary to identify and report abuse to meet the needs of the residents. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record on 11/10/21, at 10:16 a.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD reviewed LVN 6's employee file and training binder. DSD validated that LVN 6 had not completed abuse training in 2020 and 2021. DSD stated, the abuse training was not done, the abuse training was supposed to be for all the staff every year. DSD stated, she was responsible for ensuring staff complete the mandatory training and was her expectation that all staff complete mandatory training. DSD stated, all staff in-service training had been a problem at the facility for the past year. During an interview on 11/10/21, at 4:43 p.m., with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AJC HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALMS CARE CENTER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 05/17/2019 |
| SWC CA OPCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| CHESLEY, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| HAWK, REGAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| GAMETT, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055047. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.