Rolling Hills Care Center
2108 Stillman, Selma, CA 93662 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 34 certified beds · (559) 896-4990 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 34.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.52 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 31.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free from accident hazards for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nurse Assistant 2 placed a hot cup of soup at Resident 1 bedside table without first ensuring the temperature of the soup would not burn. CNA 1 was aware of Resident 1's physical limit to reach safely and left the hot cup of soup on the bedside table. These failures resulted in Resident 1 reaching for the hot cup of soup in an unsafe manner, spilling the hot soup on his chest and stomach and suffering burns to the skin that required wound care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. Leftover previously cooked rice was not monitored for cooling;2. One sanitation solution in a red bucket was not the appropriate concentration when the Food Service Worker (FSW 2) sanitized the food preparation counter; and3. The can opener was dirty with a thick black substance on the blade. This had the potential for the growth of microorganisms which can lead to food borne illness for the 31 residents admitted to the facility1. During an observation, in the kitchen, in the reach-in refrigerator, on 5/19/26 at approximately 10:38 a.m., there was a container of cooked rice dated 5/18/26 with a use by date of 5/21/26 that was 43 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During an observation with concurrent interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 5/19/2026 at 2:43 p.m., CDM confirmed the rice in the reach-in refrigerator and stated the cook on the 18th should have cooled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and implement an antibiotic (ATB) stewardship and surveillance program (ATBS-designed to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics and to limit the spread of antibiotic resistance in bacteria) for the use of antibiotics when the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not ensure the antibiotic surveillance log (chronological record used to continuous monitor antibiotic use) was complete and accurate to identify, track, and monitor resident antibiotic use. This failure had the potential to result in the administration of unnecessary and inappropriate antibiotic use, as well as inaccurate monitoring of antibiotic use which could lead to antibiotic-resistant organisms and inaccurate data monitoring and reporting. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/26 at 3:45 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development/Infection Preventionist (DSD/IP), the DSD/IP stated she started as IP in August 2025 and shared the IP position with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC). The DSD/IP stated included in her duty and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards when: 1. Oxygen safety precautions were not implemented for one of thirty two residents (Resident 36) when oxygen equipment was present in Resident 36's room and oxygen-in-use signage was not posted outside the room.This failure had the potential to expose the residents, staff, visitors and emergency responders to accident hazards, including fire or injury, due to unrecognized oxygen use and exposure to ignition sources. 2. One of seven slings (specialized fabric support used with a patient lift to safely transfer individuals with limited mobility between beds, wheelchairs, and commodes) were found with frayed edges and torn corners in the clean linen closet ready for use. This failure had the potential to cause fall and injury when used on residents requiring the use of mechanical lift for transfers. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (a summary of important…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post actual direct care staffing hours worked for public review for 30 of 30 residents in the facility, as required, by posting projected DHPPD (Direct Hours Per Patient Day) staffing information instead of actual hours worked for the prior day. This failure had the potential to prevent residents' family members and visitors from having accurate information regarding the actual nursing staffing levels providing care in the facility. During an observation on 5/19/26 at 9:34 a.m. the facilities publicly posted staffing document titled Rolling Hills Care Center Tuesday, May 19th, 2026 was reviewed. The posting reflected a projected census of 30, projected staff hours of 127 and projected Nurse Hours Per Patient Day (NHPPD) of 4.23. Staff were listed by shift (AM, PM and NOC [night shift]) with estimated hours and assigned staff names for licensed nursing and direct care staff. The document identified the staffing information as projected/estimated staffing hours and did not reflect the actual hours worked for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for the lunch meal on 5/19/26 when the facility served: 1) A #12 scoop (1/3 cup) of cauliflower instead of #8 (1/2 cup) of peas for five residents (Residents 4, 26, 35, 37 and 20);2) One resident on a soft and bite sized diet (Resident 25) received 1/3 cup instead of 1/2 cup of cauliflower; and3) Four residents on a renal diet (Resident 35, 37, 20 and 28) 1/2 cup instead of 1/3 cup of oven browned potatoes. This failure has the potential to result in residents not meeting the micronutrients (referred to as vitamins and minerals, are vital to healthy development, growth, disease prevention, and well-being) in the physician prescribed therapeutic diets which could compromise nutritional and medical status.During an observation of the lunch meal service, in the dining room, on 5/19/26 at 11:43 a.m., there were pans of the following in the steam table ( a commercial food service kitchen appliance to keep food warm, it is equipped with wells that hold heated water or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 15) was informed in advance, by the physician of the risks and benefits of proposed treatment when Resident 15 did not have a signed physician informed consent (a process in which a healthcare professional educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) prior to the administration of venlafaxine HCL (an antidepressant prescription medication used to relieve symptoms of depression such as feelings of sadness or loss of interest in activities). This failure resulted in Resident 15 receiving medication without being informed of the risks, benefits, or alternatives, limiting the resident's ability to make informed decisions about their care.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/26 at 4:11 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 15's Psychotherapeutic Drug Informed Consent Form (PDIC) for venlafaxine HCL dated 5/5/26, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for three of five sampled residents (Residents' 20, 21, and 35) when: 1. Resident 20 and 35 did not have a care plan for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-resistant drug organisms that employ targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities) secondary to having dialysis access port. This failure placed Resident 20 and Resident 35 at risk of cross-contamination (unintentional transfer of harmful bacteria, virus, or allergens from one surface, object, or food to another) and not meeting their needs and care. 2. Resident 21's duloxetine (medication used to treat depression) medication was ordered on 3/10/26, care plan was not initiated until 4/29/26. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of five sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 35) when Resident 20 and Resident 35 did not have an order for Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP-refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities) upon admission to the facility due to presence of hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) catheters. This deficient practice placed Resident 20 and resident 35 at risk of cross contamination which could lead to more serious health conditions. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/26 at 11:10 a.m. in Resident 20's room, Resident 20 was observed sitting at the edge of his bed, appropriately dressed and well groomed. Resident 20 stated he goes to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon a Medication Regimen Review (MMR) irregularity for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 24) when the facility's Consultant Pharmacist recommended Resident 24's calcium (a mineral needed for bones, teeth, muscles, and nerves) administration time be changed to 10:00 a.m. or later due to medication interaction with levothyroxine (medication that replaces the natural thyroid hormone the body is missing and must be taken on an empty stomach), scheduled for 6:00 a.m. Resident 24's calcium administration time was instead changed to 8:00 a.m. without obtaining the required physician documentation.These failures resulted in the Consultant Pharmacists recommendations not being reviewed by the doctor and the potential to reduce the effectiveness of levothyroxine, placing Resident 24 at risk for the return of hypothyroid (a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones) symptoms including weight gain, fatigue or cold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 37) was free from unnecessary drugs when Resident 37's use of anticoagulant medication (refers to class of medication that are used to prevent clot extension and formation) had no monitoring for side effects. This failure resulted in Resident 37 receiving medication and had the potential to experienced side effects of medication without proper monitoring. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/19/26 at 9:05 a.m. with Resident 37 in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident 37 was observed sitting up in his wheelchair and was assisted by staff, left foot wrapped with gauze dressing (medical cloth patch or gauze made of loosely woven cotton), Resident 37 stated his left small toe was surgically amputated. During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, (AR-a document containing resident profile information), dated 5/21/26, the AR indicated Resident 37 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure there was a full time qualified Dietary Manager (DM) met state requirements, California Health and Safety Code (CA HSC) 1265.4(b) when the Registered Dietitian (RD) was not employed full-time. This failure resulted in puree food not in the proper form, puree foods not being prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor, menus not being followed and food stored not being monitored for cool down procedures for the 31 residents admitted to the facility. (Cross Reference F803, 804, 805, 812). During a review of the California Health and Safety Code (CA HSC) 1265.4 (a), If the facility employs a RD less than full-time, they shall also employ a full-time dietetic services supervisor who meets the requirements of subdivision (b) to supervise dietetic service operations. 1265.4 (b) stated, the dietetic services supervisor shall have completed one of seven recognized pathways, two of which include the completion of an education program approved by the Dietary Managers Association and successful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure puree foods were prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor when [NAME] 1 made puree roasted potatoes and cauliflower were prepared with water for two residents (Residents 4 and 26) that were on a physician's prescribed puree diet. This can result in residents receiving improper nutrients from the food which can result in a decrease in meeting the nutrient needs which can further compromise their medical status. During an observation in the kitchen and concurrent interview with [NAME] 1 on 5/19/26 at 10:21 a.m, [NAME] 1 scooped two #8 (1/2 cup) scoop portions into blender then added, #24 scoop (1-1/3 ounces) butter, and five ounces of hot water from hot water dispenser spicket then blended. The measuring cup contained 8 ounces of hot water then after hot water was poured into blender there were three ounces of hot water left. [NAME] 1 used plastic spoon to stir then poured into two bowls. The puree…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure puree food was in the proper form for two sampled residents (Residents 4 and 26) on their lunch meal tray on 5/19/26. This failure has the potential to result in choking (when the airway is obstructed by food, drink, or foreign objects) for Residents 4 and 26 who were on the physician prescribed therapeutic diet. During an observation in the kitchen and concurrent interview with [NAME] 1 on 5/19/26 at 10:21 a.m, [NAME] 1 scooped two #8 (1/2 cup) scoop portions into blender then added, #24 scoop (1-1/3 ounces) butter, and five ounces of hot water from hot water dispenser spicket then blended. The measuring cup contained 8 ounces of hot water then after hot water was poured into blender there were three ounces of hot water left. [NAME] 1 used plastic spoon to stir then poured into two bowls. The puree potatoes had flecks of skin present, appeared very thin and watery. [NAME] 1 stated she is looking for creamy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and confidential medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one of five sampled residents (Resident 15) when Resident 15's electronic health record (EHR) contained annual History and Physicals (H&P - A comprehensive assessment of a person's medical history), that belonged to five different residents (Residents 6, 17, 24, 40, and 41).These failures resulted in the compromised accuracy of Resident 15's medical records and violated the confidentiality of Protected Health Information (PHI - any health-related information that identifies a specific person) for Residents 6, 17, 24, 40, and 41.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/26 at 3:44 p.m. with Medical Records/Activities Director (MR/AD), Resident 15's EHR document titled Annual H&P Examination, dated 12/28/2025, was reviewed. Resident 15's Annual H&P Examination included H&P's that belonged to Residents 6, 17, 24, 40 and 41. MR/AD stated the records for Residents 6,17, 24, 40 and 41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sterile water bottles used for oxygen humidification were labeled with the open date for one of 32 residents (Resident 35) observed receiving oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential to result in the use of contaminated respiratory equipment and increased the risk of infection. Findings:During an interview on 5/19/26 at 9:36 a.m. in Resident 35's room, Resident 35 stated he had been admitted to the facility approximately six days prior. Resident 35 was observed wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator and stated he had not used oxygen prior to admission, but used it at the facility as needed. The sterile water bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator for humidification was not labeled with the date opened. During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1 was competent to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services safely and effectively when DC 1 thawed frozen meat without running cold water. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe food being served, consumed, and could have cause food borne illness (contamination of food and occur at any stage of the food production, delivery and consumption chain) to 29 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/20/24 at 11:17 a.m. in the kitchen, with Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1, frozen meat was submerged in a bucket of water. DC 1 stated she pulled out the frozen meat to make dinner for 11/20/24. DC 1 stated she worked as a cook for nine months. DC 1 stated, I had a rapid training from my previous supervisor that was three days of training. DC 1 stated she was trained to defrost meat submerged in water. DC 1 stated she was not aware of having cold water running when frozen meat was submerged in water. DC 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice for food service safety when: 1 One opened box of pancake batter mix was not labeled with an open on date. 2. Residents snacks were not labeled with prepared on date an in refrigerator for residents to eat. 3. A hornet and wasp pesticide (bug spray) bottle was found below kitchen sink cabinet. 4. Six bags of muffins in the freezer were not labeled with the received-on date. 5. Resident refrigerator contained unlabeled foods with no received on date, resident name and content. 6. Uncooked frozen meat were found inside the resident refrigerator. These failures had the potential to transmit food-borne illnesses (caused by eating or drinking something that is contaminated with germs such as bacteria, viruses, or parasites or chemicals such as toxins or metals that can make people sick) and cross-contamination( transfer of harmful bacteria, parasites, or viruses from one food to another, or from surfaces to food ) to 29 of 29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the survey period of 11/19/24 to 11/25/24, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet (sq. ft- unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms, and at least 100 sq. ft in single residents rooms for 11 of 20 rooms (Rooms 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 19, and 20), when the amount of usable living space was not adequate for residents. This failure had the potential for residents in Rooms 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 19, and 20 to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an environment tour with the Maintenance Director on 11/25/24 03:05 PM, the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. These rooms were as follows: Room Number Square Feet # of Residents 1 120 2 2 120 1 3 118 1 4 118 1 5 92 1 6 174 3 7 102 1 8 118 2 9 117 2 10 117 2 11 117 2 12 111 2 13 114 1 14 110 1 15 113 1 16 118 1 17 111 1 18 117 2 19 92 1 20 95 1 However, variations were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the environment free from insects in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) Pest Control Program when ants were observed in the kitchen floor and cabinet. This failure led to insects being observed in the kitchen facility and had the potential to cross contaminate food being prepared in the kitchen for 29 residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 8:15 a.m. in the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), multiple live and dead ants were on the ground and under the sink of a cabinet. The CDM stated ants should not be in the kitchen. The CDM confirmed multiple ants were in the kitchen floor and under the sink cabinet. During an interview on 11/21/24 on 4:38 p.m. with the CDM, the CDM stated, ants should not be in the kitchen. The CDM stated, ants could have cross contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria, parasites, or viruses from one food to another, or from surfaces to food) food and items in the kitchen. The CDM stated residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plans (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for three of 16 residents (Residents 3, 9 and 23) when: 1. Resident 9's care plan was not developed to address the use and storage of Resident 9's Incentive Spirometer (IS - a hand-held device that helps people take slow deep breaths to improve lung functioning). This failure put Resident 9 at risk of infection and harm due to improper storage and use of the IS. 2. Resident 23's care plan was not developed to address the use and care of a nebulizer (a device that changes medication from a liquid to a mist so it can be inhaled into the lungs). This failure put Resident 23 at risk of infection and harm due to improper storage and use of Resident 23's nebulizer. 3. Resident 23's care plan was not developed and implemented to address Resident 23's non-compliance with the proper use and storage of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for three of 16 sampled residents (Resident 23 and Resident 3) when: 1. Resident 23's oxygen flow rate was set to 3L (liters-a unit of measurement) instead of the ordered 2L. This failure had the potential to result in shortness of breath and respiratory distress (difficulty breathing) for Resident 23. 2. The Attending Physician (AP) was not notified of Resident 3's refusal of lidocaine (medication is used on the skin for pain) patch. This failure resulted in Resident 3 not receiving ordered pain medication. 3. Resident 3's physician order (a set of instructions written by a doctor for clinicians to follow when caring for a resident) for pain medication was not followed. This failure resulted in Resident 3's physician not being notified of his continued moderate pain (pain measuring at a four to six on the pain scale- a tool used to measure pain intensity and help doctors manage pain). Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals (a substance such as vaccines or drugs derived from a living organism used for treatment) were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and practice when: 1. One of one bottle of folic acid (a mineral) did not have a readable expiration date on the bottle, and one of 161 pill packets (a packet that contains a set number of medication pills of the same brand in individual pop-out wrapping) was expired. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired medications resulting in medication ineffectiveness (not producing any significant or desired effect). 2. One of 3 bottles of artificial tears (medication used to moisturize the eyes) and one of 15 inhalers (medications used to treat respiratory disease with a mist or spray that the patient breathes in through the nose or mouth) were not labeled with the resident's name or expiration date. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving the wrong medication which could lead…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to be established and maintained an infection control program to provide safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent infections for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 23) when: 1. Resident 30's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- is a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) mask was observed not stored in a bag and on the ground. 2. Resident 23's oxygen tubing (a tube that delivers oxygen to people who have low oxygen levels) was observed wrapped around Resident 23's bed rail, not stored in a bag, and Resident 23's nebulizer (a device that changes medication from a liquid to a mist so it can be inhaled into the lungs) was observed on the ground, not covered in a bag. These failures placed Resident 30 and Resident 23 at risk to develop respiratory and healthcare associate infections. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/19/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable and homelike environment for two of 16 sampled Residents (Resident 9, Resident 23), when Resident 9 and Resident 23 were unable to access and use their personal belongings and medical equipment to the extent possible as needed. This failure resulted in Resident 9 and Resident 23 not having a safe homelike environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 10:35 a.m. with Resident 9, in Resident 9's room, Resident 9 was observed dressed, laying in his bed with plastic grocery bags on his bed against the wall. A bed-side table with food and condiments was observed next to his bed and Resident 9's wheelchair was observed facing Resident 9 pushed up against his bed. Resident 9 stated he had been in the facility for one month due to an infection that went to his heart. Resident 9 stated there was not enough room to move around in his room. During a review of Resident 9's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 31) had a post-discharge plan of care (narrative document for communicating clinical information about what happened to the resident in the facility) when Resident 31 left AMA (Against Medical Advice- term used in healthcare when a patient leaves the hospital before their doctor recommends discharge). This failure resulted Resident 31's not having a post-discharge plan of care (document that summarizes a patient's health conditions, treatments, and other information) and had the potential to not adjust to new living environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 11/25/25, the AR indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of osteomyelitis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident rights when: A hot shower request for three of nine sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 and 6), was not an option, and the alternative was a cold shower or no shower. This failure resulted in Resident 1, 2 and 6 individual preferences or choice being devalued (reduce or underestimate the worth of importance of) and not being treated with honor or respect. Findings: During an interview on 9/19/24 at 6:35 p.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the facility did not have hot water in the showers and she was not able to take a shower as scheduled. Resident 1 stated the facility has two showers but one had been broken for some, the facility only had one working shower and now that shower wasn ' t working. Resident 1 stated she cannot shower tonight (9/19/24) unless she wanted a cold shower. During an observation on 9/19/24 at 6:40 p.m., the [NAME] side shower was turned on. Water was turned on for 4 minutes and no hot or warm water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 30 of 30 sampled residents when: 1. The cabinet storing clean pots and pans had dust and food crumbs, and a drawer that stored clean utensils had food crumbs. 2. The side wall of the stove was caked with black grime and grease, and the floor behind the stove had a build-up of black grime and crumbs. The upstairs dining room food serving area had a dirty wall with a yellow drip stain and wadded paper observed behind the steam table. Food particles and dirt were observed next to the steam table along the space between the wall and floor where there was no baseboard in place. 3. The floor under the dishwasher was not smooth and easily cleanable. 4. There was an opening in the wall of the kitchen that was open to the outside. This had the potential to allow insects and rodents to enter from the outside. 5. The ice machine and food prep sink did not have an air gap (a vertical space between the end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for three of eight sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 13 and Resident 20) when: 1.Resident 12's Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a written portable medical order form with instructions for emergency medical care that travels with a resident ) was not completely documented with Resident 12's information. 2. Resident 13 and Resident 20's POLST did not have the second page completed. These failures resulted in Resident 12, Resident 13, and Resident 20's medical information to not be readily accessible and portable in case of an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated 10/3/19, the back side of the POLST form that provides resident information, supervising physician, and additional contact information was not completed. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to oversee grievances in accordance with their policy and procedure (P&P) for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 15) when the facility's Social Services Director (SSD) failed to document, track, and investigate the grievance reported by Resident 15. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 15 not being able to exercise her rights and lack of appropriate action to resolve her grievances. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 1/11/24, the AR indicated, Resident 15 was admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] to the facility, with diagnoses which included Fracture of Left Femur (broken left thigh bone), Malignant Neoplasm of the Lung (a type of cancer that starts in the lungs, symptoms includes coughing up blood, shortness of breath, chest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to meet standards of quality for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 26) when Resident 26's morning medications (sertraline-antidepressant and lamotrigine-anticonvulsive) were in a medication cup on Resident 26's bedside table. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 26 not taking her medications and other residents in the facility at risk for taking the unprescribed medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/24 at 9:17 a.m. with Resident 26, in Resident 26's room, Resident 26 lay in bed with a bedside table next to her. Resident 26's bedside table had a cup of juice, a bowl of cream of wheat and a medication cup with two medications in it. The medication cup had one blue pill and one green and white capsule. Resident 26 stated the medications in the medication cup were hers. Resident 26 stated the two medications in the cup were sertraline and lamotrigine. Resident 26 stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of four sampled Residents (Resident 25) when Resident 25 was administered oxycodone HCl (a narcotic used to treat severe pain that can result in physical dependence) for treatment of a healed wound. This failure placed Resident 25 at risk for receiving pain medication unnecessarily which could lead to medication dependence. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 11:42 a.m. with Resident 25, Resident 25 stated he was experiencing pain in both shoulders that was progressing down both arms. Resident 25 stated the pain increased when lifting both arms and pain medication was not effective. During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store and secure medications in a locked compartment for five of five sampled medications when discontinued medications albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol (medication for breathing), ipratropium and albuterol (nebulizer solution, used to open the airways in lung diseases where spasm may cause breathing problems), and two boxes of loperamide hydrochloride and simethicone tablets (antidiarrheal and anti-gas tablets) and guaifenesin (helps clear mucus) were stored in an unlocked drawer in the nurse's station. This failure had the potential for residents and staff to have access to the medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/24 at 4:20 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in the nurses' station, five medication boxes were stored in an unlocked drawer. LVN 1 validated the medications observed were albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol with a handwritten date of 12/3/23, ipratropium and albuterol with a handwritten date of 12/28/23, loperamide hydrochloride and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain and provide one of one resident (Resident 12) beds in safe operating condition when Resident 12's head of the bed and foot of the bed would not raise up or lower. This failure resulted in Resident 12 being uncomfortable while in her bed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/24 at 9:17 a.m. with Resident 12, Resident 12's bed would not raise or lower at the head of the bed (HOB) or the foot of the bed (FOB). Resident 12 stated, the bed had not functioned for six months, and she had made staff aware of the issue. Resident 12 stated when she wanted to sit upright, the staff would position pillows behind her back in bed, causing discomfort. Resident 12 stated she would have to sit up in her wheelchair during her meals or sit up at the edge of the bed having to adjust frequently. Resident 12 stated she felt uncomfortable because she did not always want to lay flat on the bed. During a review of Resident 12's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-14 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the survey period of 1/9/24 to 1/12/24, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet (sq. ft- unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms, and at least 100 sq. ft in single residents rooms for 16 of 20 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20), when the amount of usable living space was not adequate for residents. This failure had the potential for residents in Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, and 20 to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an environment tour with the Maintenance Director on 1/12/24 at 9:17 a.m., the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. These rooms were as follows: Room Number Square Feet 1 Resident A = 59.95 sq. ft Resident B = 59.95 sq. ft 2 Resident A = 59.69 sq. ft Resident B = 60.21 sq. ft 3 Resident A = 58.27 sq. ft Resident B = 59.75 sq. ft 4 Resident A = 58.84 sp. ft Resident B = 58.84 sq. ft 5 92.17 sq. ft (single resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AJC HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROLLING HILLS CARE CENTER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 05/17/2019 |
| SWC CA OPCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| CHESLEY, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| COOK, BRETT | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| GAMETT, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555892. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.