Noble Care Center
2740 North California Street, Stockton, CA 95204 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (916) 660-2505 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (87) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.45 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.39 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
30.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 30.3%CMS range 21.6–43.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 8.7–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 48.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 76.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.5–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
87 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 76 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not address Resident 2's escalating behaviors and noncompliance of his medications which resulted in Resident 2 hitting Resident 1 multiple times in the face on 12/4/25.This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining multiple injuries to his face and required him to be transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] for immediate treatment. This failure also has the potential for psychosocial harm to Resident 1.Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of, but not limited to dementia (a range of conditions involving a significant loss of mental abilities such as memory, thinking, and reasoning skills severe enough to interfere with a person's daily life and activities), schizophrenia (a serious brain condition that affects how a person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) when:Wound care treatments were not documented daily as ordered by the physician for Resident 2 in February 2026 and March 2026; and,Wound care treatments, skin assessments, and skin treatments were not documented daily as ordered by the physician for Resident 3 in February 2026 and March 2026.These failures resulted in an inaccurate representation of the residents' progress in their plan of care and had the potential to result in a decreased well-being for Resident 2 and Resident 3.Findings:1. A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses which included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body making it impossible to stand or walk), amputation of left and right legs above the knee (surgical removal of both legs), and hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood pushing against the blood vessel walls is consistently too high which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection prevention practices were used for a census of 96 when a staff member changed bed linens in the room of a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control interventions designed to reduce the spread of multidrug resistant organisms [MDRO, germs that are more difficult to kill with antibiotics] in nursing homes) on 4/15/26.This failed practice could contribute to the spread of infection by cross-contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful germs from one person, object, or place to another) in the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 3's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), blepharitis (a condition that causes swelling, itching, and other irritation of the eyelids), and amputation of right leg below the knee (surgical removal of right lower leg).A review of Resident 3's Physician Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) from physical abuse by another resident when Resident 1 allegedly pushed his wheelchair into Resident 2's knees on 3/17/26 and punched her in the abdomen on 3/19/26. This failure resulted in Resident 2 being physically assaulted by Resident 1 on two occasions and had the potential to negatively affect her psychosocial well-being.Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (a condition that causes a decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem solving) and psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality). During a review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS [a tool used to screen for cognitive impairment]), the document indicated a score of 4 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, Care Plan Report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential abuse was reported in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure resulted in a delay in the abuse investigation and decreased the facility's potential to protect residents from physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis (disease that causes joint pain and stiffness) and depression (mental health condition that causes a persistent feeling of sadness). During a review of Resident 2's clinical document titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), (a tool used to screen for cognitive impairment), the document indicated a score of 15 which suggested that cognition was intact. A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (condition that causes a decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem solving) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director (MD) was notified and made aware of potential health changes for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 refused to eat, take his medications, and exhibited aggressive behavior.This deficient practice resulted in the MD not being able to assess Resident 1's health status with the potential delay in treatment.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the summer of 2025 with diagnoses including: need for assistance with personal care, unspecified dementia/ unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance (an umbrella term for a decline in mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life. It affects memory, thinking, and behavior, and is not a normal part of aging), and suicidal ideations.During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 7/16/25, the Progress Notes, indicated, .Resident has done nothing except lay facing the wall in his bed. Refused to eat. Refused Covid booster. Refused all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a safe discharge plan was in place for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when:1. The facility did not notify and document that the Ombudsman (acts as an independent and impartial resource to help individuals and groups resolve issues and complaints, often within a larger organization or government agency), Adult Protective Services (APS- programs that promote the safety, independence, and quality-of-life for vulnerable adults who are, or are in danger of, being abused, neglected by self or others, or financially exploited, and who are unable to protect themselves), the police department, and Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) were contacted upon his Discharge Against Medical Advice ([NAME]- when a patient leaves a hospital or healthcare facility before their doctor recommends they be discharged ) from the facility.2. The Medical Director (MD) did not receive notification from the facility that Resident 1 was attempting to leave…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy services for one of three sample residents (Resident 1) as ordered by the physician and as outlined in the plan of care when Resident 1 was ordered to receive physical therapy five times per week beginning on 7/4/25 but documentation showed multiple missed therapy sessions.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for decline in functional abilities and unmet care plan goals.Findings:A Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the urinary system), diabetes type 2 (the body's inability to regulate sugar levels), acute kidney failure (sudden onset usually due to a medical issue), stage 3 chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are moderately damaged and unable to filter waste products effectively), and muscle wasting atrophy (a condition where muscles lose mass and strength due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a safe discharge plan in place when Resident 1 expressed wanting to leave the facility against medical advice (AMA - a situation where a resident left a facility without following the physician's recommendation for treatment). This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility AMA when he was not equipped to meet his healthcare needs and was found lying in an unknown person ' s front yard 3.4 miles from the facility confused and gravely disabled (a person who was unable to provide for their basic needs [food, clothing, shelter, gravely disabled personal safety, or necessary medical care]). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record from [ACUTE CARE HOSPTIAL NAME], titled, History and Physical Reports, dated 2/9/25, by Physician (PHYS) 1, indicated upon entrance to the Emergency Department (ED), Resident 1 was restless and only able to identify his name (not place, time, or event). Resident 1 had fallen and hit his head on 2/8/25 and had acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment for residents when two of two garbage dumpsters located outside the kitchen service entrance did not have the lids down to cover the trash. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents due to possible insect and rodent infestation and spread of disease in the facility. Findings: During observations on 3/12/25 at 8:12 a.m., and again at 9:30 a.m., two garbage dumpsters were located outside the kitchen service entrance in the facility's parking lot, that were locked behind a gate with open lids. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/12/25 at 9:30 a.m., with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The CDM stated that leaving the lids open was normal and the dumpsters had always been uncovered since she started working in the facility. The CDM further stated that this practice had the potential to lead to insect and rodent infestation. A review of an undated facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable homelike environment for a census of 91 when: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER], occupied by three residents, had patched wall work done unevenly in white spackle (a compound used to fill cracks and holes in walls) that did not match the paint on the wall, and several spots of different colored paint; and, 2. A Shared [NAME] and [NAME] (shared bathroom between two rooms that have an entrance from each room) style bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] had a sink pulling out from the wall with cracked caulking (a waterproof filler and sealant), a large circular area on the wall near the handrail had missing paint, and a broken raised toilet seat; and, 3. room [ROOM NUMBER], occupied by three residents, had white caulked patches over dark spots on a tan door frame, uneven white spackle was not painted to match the tan wall, tan and brown stains on the wall, a large area of the wall next to bed C had uneven spackle, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 76 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for a census of 91 when: 1. Two over-the-counter (medication that can be obtained without a doctors order) medication bottles were stored in open view on the bedside table of Resident 90, in a multi-resident room; 2. An Emergency Kit (E-kit -a locked and secure box containing an available collection of medications and supplies designed to address immediate needs when the pharmacy is unavailable) was opened and a medication was used without the proper documentation per facility policy; and, 3. An opened and used multi-dose vial of Heparin (an injectable medication given to prevent blood clots) was not dated with an opened or use by date per standards of practice. These failures may pose unsafe medication use in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on [DATE], at 12:20 PM, in Resident 90's room with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 confirmed Resident 90 had one bottle of Fish oil…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving pureed chicken and pureed noodles received the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician when serving sizes were smaller than ordered for the 14 residents receiving a Pureed (soft, pudding-like consistency) diet, and the 10 residents receiving the pureed meat on the Dysphagia Mechanical diet (texture- modified diet designed to make foods easier to chew and swallow). This failure had the potential of leading to malnutrition and weight loss for the 14 residents receiving a Pureed diet, and the 10 residents receiving the pureed meat on the Dysphagia Mechanical diet. Findings: During an observation of the lunch meal on 3/12/25, at 11:42 a.m., the service utensils were noted for the various foods. The pureed sweet and sour chicken was noted to have a green handled scoop (equivalent to 2 2/3 ounces {unit of measurement}) in the pan, which was the only scoop used during the lunch meal service. The pureed noodles also had a green handled scoop (2 2/3 ounces) placed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 87 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. Two food labels were unreadable, two labels did not include the year, and several bottles of seasoning did not have a use by date; 2. Dry storage walls were not smooth and cleanable, floor of the dry storage was uneven, the refrigerator door appeared discolored, and the kitchen floor had missing and cracked tiles; 3. One container of baking powder was left open and unsealed; 4. Dry storage floor was discolored and sticky, oven doors, microwave, and toaster had food residue on surfaces, and the shelf under the dishwashing machine appeared discolored and rough to the touch; 5. Two containers of sugar and flour were stored directly on kitchen floor, as well as a box of juices in the emergency food closet; 6. Kitchen had worn food preparation equipment such as a rusty strainer, one pot had food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI, a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes) committee failed to develop and implement action plans, for a problem identified in June 2024, when three of eight sampled employee files (Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 2, and Licensed Nurse (LN) 8) did not contain background checks until 22-24 months after their hire dates. These failures had the potential to expose residents to physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: During an interview and record review on 3/11/25, at 12:09 PM, CNA 1's employee file was reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD confirmed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 was hired on 4/26/23, and the background check (a screening for a history of fraud, abuse, and criminal offenses) in her file was completed on 2/11/25. The DSD confirmed the background check was not completed until 22 months after the hire date. The DSD stated the importance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 39) had their rights related to treatment choices known and protected when, a copy of Resident 39's Advance Directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) was not available in the medical record. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 39's preferences for treatment to not be followed. Findings: A review of Resident 39's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and cognitive communication deficit (communication problem that stems from difficulties with thinking and processing information). A review of Resident 39's medical record titled, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment [POLST - a form that contains…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to resubmit the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a required assessment for individuals with mental illness, intellectual or developmental disabilities, or related conditions, so that a determination of need, appropriate setting, and a set of recommendations for services to be included in the individual's plan of care is provided) for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 71) when, Resident 71's PASRR was not submitted by the facility on the 31st day after admission to the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 71 to not receive the necessary services to meet their mental and psychosocial (the link between social factors and individual thought and behavior) needs. Findings: A review of Resident 71's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 71 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). A review of Resident 71's medical record, from the transferring hospital, titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission as required to address resident-specific care needs for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 249) when, Resident 249's admission document identified a communication need that was not addressed on his baseline care plan. This failure had the potential for Resident 249 to not receive person-centered care. Findings: A review of Resident 249's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 249 was admitted in 2/28/25 with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily living). A review of Resident 249's Social Services Assessment-Admission/Re-Admission, dated 3/5/25, indicated that Resident 249's primary language was [NAME], and further indicated that Resident 249 could not communicate in English. During an observation on 3/12/25, at 12:29 p.m., of Resident 249 in his room, Resident 249…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-specific care plan intervention for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 66) when, Resident 66 had no care plan addressing his anticoagulant care needs. This failure placed Resident 66 at risk for a decline in their health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 66's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 66 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included amputation of both legs below the knees (surgical procedure to remove the lower legs below the knees when they were severely damaged or diseased), and amputation of fingers on right and left hand due to frostbite (surgical procedures to remove fingers of both hands when they were severely damaged due to frostbite (injury caused by freezing of the skin and underlying tissue)). A review of Resident 66's Physician Order Summary, indicated, .Apixaban Oral Tablet [anticoagulant (medication used to prevent or reduce blood clots)] 5 MG [unit of measure] .Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for treat and prevent blood clot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an IDT (Interdisciplinary Team: group of healthcare professionals from various disciplines that works together to develop and implement individualized resident care plans) meetings for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 31), when Resident 31 ' s quarterly IDT care conferences were not conducted as scheduled for April 2024 and October 2024. This failure had potential to result in Resident 31's changing care needs not being accurately reflected in the care plan and the current care interventions not being readily available to implement and evaluate for their effectiveness and relevance. Findings: Review of Resident 31's admission RECORD indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels) and hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of lipids (fats) in the blood). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/13/25, at 10 a.m., Resident 31's electronic medical record (EHR) was reviewed with the Social Services Director (SSD). The SSD stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate treatment and services were provided for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 96) when Resident 96's STAT order (should be prioritized first as it is needed urgently) left hand x-ray was delayed and the delay in the order being carried out was not reported to the physician in a timely manner. This failure placed Resident 96's at risk of worsening and prolonged pain while awaiting for diagnosis of the left hand injury. Findings: A review of Resident 96's medical record titled, admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 96 was admitted to the facility in early 2025 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disturbance of brain function) and cognitive communication deficit (communication problem that stems from difficulties with thinking and processing information). During an observation and interview on 3/11/25, at 11:36 a.m., with Resident 96, Resident 96 was noted to have bruising on the back part of his left hand. Resident 96 stated that he got the bruising from somewhere but does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 65) when, Resident 65's footboard (part of the bed frame located at the foot of the bed) was broken and splintered. This failure had the potential to cause harm to Resident 65. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/25, at 11:53 AM, in Resident 65's room, it was observed that Resident 65 had a broken footboard that had exposed splinters and sharp edges on the side that faced Resident 65. Upon further observation it was noted that there was a thick black tape placed around the broken part of the footboard; however, it did not cover the sharp and splintered part facing Resident 65. Resident 65 stated it had been taped for a while, but could not recall who taped it, or when it was taped. Resident 65 further stated she could hurt herself on it and the footboard should be fixed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/25, at 12:24 PM, in Resident 65's room, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 confirmed the footboard was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs for two of twenty sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 300) when: 1. Resident 66's antibiotic (a medication that kills germs) doses were not documented accurately in the medical record; and, 2. Resident 300's nicotine patch (a nicotine medicated patch worn on the skin to help reduce cravings of cigarettes) was not available for use for 6 days. These failures had the potential for Resident 66's infection (invasion and growth of germs in the body) to not be fully treated, resulting in a decline of his health and well-being and, resulted in Resident 300 feeling anxious without the nicotine patch and did not allow Resident 300 to achieve his highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 66's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 66 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection (MRSA, presence of germs in the body that do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled patients (Patient 68) was free from unnecessary medication when Patient 68 was receiving antidepressant medication with no monitoring for side effects or behavior manifestations of depression and the pharmacist's recommendation for a review of the medication use was not acknowledged by the physician in a timely manner. These failures had the potential for Patient 68 to receive unnecessary medication and the potential for medication side effects to go unnoticed, negatively impacting Patient 68's health and well - being. Findings: A review of Patient 68's admission RECORD, indicated, she was admitted to the facility in early 2024, with diagnoses which included depression. A review of Patient 68's Order Details, dated 6/12/24, indicated, .Selegiline HCL [hydrochloride] [medication prescribed to treat depression] .one time a day for m/b [manifested behavior] verbalization of sadness related to DEPRESSION . A review of an online document, accessed on 3/21/25, published by the National Library of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe monitoring and assessment of blood pressure (BP-the force of your blood pushing against the walls of your arteries as your heart pumps blood and was measured as two numbers: systolic (when the heart beats) and diastolic (when the heart rests between beats)) and heart rate (HR-frequency of your heart beats per minute) for medications to treat high (hypertension (HTN)) and low (hypotension) BP for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 35) when: 1. Resident 35's physician's prescribed hold parameters (a set of numbers that guide the nursing staff when to not give medication for safety reasons) for midodrine (medication used to treat low BP) was not followed; 2. Resident 35's physician's prescribed hold parameters for labetalol (a medication used to treat HTN) were not followed; 3. Resident 35's BP and HR readings used to determine hold parameters for administering BP medications were used for more than one dose of medication at different times on the same day for both midodrine and labetalol; and, 4. Licensed Nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standardized recipes were utilized for food preparation to ensure foods were prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor when vegetables were placed into the steam table approximately three hours before meal service, and measurement tools were not used during meal preparation for the 87 residents receiving kitchen prepared meals. These deficient practices placed residents at an increased risk for nutritional impairment. Findings: During an observation on 3/12/25, at 8:29 a.m., [NAME] 1 (CK 1) added a green scoop of butter to vegetables in a pot on the stove. The [NAME] was unsure of the amount in the scoop. During an observation on 3/12/25, at 8:32 a.m., CK 1 set a pot of water on stove to make noodles and added an unmeasured amount of oil. During an observation on 3/12/25, at 9 a.m., CK 1 transferred vegetables from the steamer to a steam table pan and added a handful of salt, a plastic spoon of black pepper, 3 spoonfuls of garlic powder, and an unmeasured amount of butter. After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the alternative meal option of a grilled cheese sandwich had a similar protein content to the main entrée for the 87 residents receiving kitchen prepared meals. This had the potential of leading to inadequate protein intake/malnutrition for those residents choosing the sandwich in place of the main entrée. Findings: During an observation of the facility menu posted outside of the kitchen on 3/11/25, at 10:50 a.m., the alternative choices menu was observed. The choices on the Spring 2025 menu included a Grilled Cheese Sandwich without any additional items listed. Review of a facility provided recipe titled, Grilled Two-Cheese Sandwich, indicated that each sandwich was made with 2 ounces [unit of measurement] of cheese, the equivalent of 2 ounces of protein or 14 grams [unit of measurement] of protein. Review of the Cook's Spreadsheet for the lunch meal served on 3/12/25, indicated that the serving size for the Sweet and Sour Chicken was ½ cup (4 ounces) for the small portion, and ¾ cup (6 ounces)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 31) when portions of Resident 31's medical records were discovered in Resident 98's medical record during a closed record review (examining a residents medical records after their care has concluded (for example; discharge, death). This failure had the potential for exposure of Resident 31's private and confidential information to unauthorized individuals. Findings: During a closed record review of Resident 98's paper medical record file on 3/14/25, at 8:12 a.m., Resident 98's paper medical record file contained paper medical record documents belonging to Resident 31. During an interview and concurrent record review on 3/14/25, at 9:05 a.m., Resident 98's paper medical record file was reviewed with the Medical Records Clerk (MR). The MR confirmed that there were medical record documents in Resident 98's medical record file that belonged to Resident 31. The MR stated that the risk of placing another resident's records in the wrong file was a violation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 91 when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not clean, sanitize, and disinfect the glucometer (a device that measures blood sugar levels) per manufacturer's guidelines; and 2. A partially full urinal was sitting on the bedside table with Resident 300's water. These failures had the potential to spread infection and cause health problems to the residents for a census of 91. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/25, at 12:24 PM, in front of room [ROOM NUMBER], LN 1 was observed cleaning a glucometer after use. LN 1 took one (name brand pre-moistened disinfectant wipe) and cleansed the glucometer for a few seconds and then placed the glucometer on a tray on her medication cart. LN 1 stated she cleaned the glucometer for approximately 15 seconds and could not remember how long the recommended wet-contact time was (how long a disinfectant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP- a federally mandated program with goals of monitoring, optimizing antibiotic use, and reducing misuse of antibiotics) was followed for one of two residents on antibiotics (Resident 90) in a sample of 20 based on facility policy and national standards when: 1. McGeer Criteria (a set of guidelines for identifying infections in long-term care facilities) was not followed for prescribing antibiotics as indicated in the facility policy and procedure for Resident 90; and, 2. An antibiotic time-out (an active reassessment of an antibiotic prescription 48-72 hours after the medication's first dose) for Resident 90 was done within 24 hours and did not follow the facility's policy and procedure of the ASP; and, 3. The facility did not order a diagnostic urine Culture (a test to find germs, such as bacteria, that can cause an infection) and Sensitivity ([C&S]- a sensitivity test checks to see what kind of medicine such as an antibiotic that will work best to treat an infection) test for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's care needs for alcohol withdrawal and elopement prevention were not addressed on admission. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 ' s elopement from the facility on 12/6/24 and 12/13/24. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility from Acute Hospital 1 on 12/4/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to alcohol use with intoxication, discitis (an inflammation of the intervertebral discs, convulsion (a sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body, caused by involuntary contraction of muscles), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic lung disease that causes breathing problems and restricted airflow). Review of Resident 1 ' s Physician Progress Note from Acute Hospital 1 dated 11/27/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the hospital for generalized pain. Resident 1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a copy of medical records to Resident 1 within 2 days after a written request was made by Resident 1 on 11/14/24. This failure delayed Resident 1's right to obtain his medical records in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's, admission Record, dated 5/5/23, the admission record indicated that Resident 1 was his own Responsible Party (person responsible for making health care decisions). During an interview on 11/19/24 at 9:55 a.m. with Social Services (SS), the SS stated Resident 1 called on 11/4/24 to ask for a copy of his discharge paperwork. The SS informed Resident 1 he would need to fill out a medical records request form and send it back to the facility. The SS stated the medical records request form was sent to Resident 1 on 11/4/24. During an interview on 11/19/24 at 10:17 a.m. with Medical Records (MR), the MR stated she received a fax number from SS to send Resident 1's discharge paperwork to. The MR stated there was a protocol in place for medical record requests. The MR stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when a medication used to control pain was not ordered and delivered. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience nerve pain. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2024, with diagnosis of, but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus (DM) (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition in which your lungs have a hard time loading your blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report dated 10/23/2024, the Order Summary Report indicated that Gabapentin (a medication used for nerve pain, which can be caused by different conditions, including diabetes and shingles) Oral Capsule 100 MG (Gabapentin) was ordered for Resident 1 on 5/02/24 with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the office of the local Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (OMB, an official advocate who represents the interests of the residents residing in a LTC facility) a copy of the Notice of Transfer/ Discharge for Resident 1 prior to Resident 1's discharge from the facility. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of not receiving the necessary protections and support of the LTC Ombudsman office. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2024. A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, NOTICE OF TRANSFER/DISCHARGE, indicated .Notification Date: 6/21/24 .Effective Date: 6/27/24 .Transfer/Discharge to .Shelter for the Homeless .This notice is to inform you that transfer/discharge is necessary for the following reason .The transfer or discharge is appropriate because your health has improved sufficiently .If you intend to file an appeal of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents' (Resident 1) smoking safety evaluation records were completed in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to cause inaccurate documentation in Resident 1's clinical record and had the potential to cause injury from smoking. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June of 2024, with a diagnosis of, but not limited to, personal history of nicotine dependence (an addiction to tobacco products caused by the drug nicotine) and toxic effect of tobacco cigarette. During an observation on 7/11/24, at 4:05 p.m., in the designated smoking area, Resident 1 was observed smoking without a smoking apron. During a review of Resident 1's undated Smoking Safety Evaluation record, the effective date of the evaluation record was listed as 6/26/24 at 3 pm. The signed date was listed as 7/12/24 at 3:16 pm. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/24/24, at 3:51 p.m., with the Medical Records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1) right to be free from physical abuse by facility staff, when Resident 1 was grabbed and was hit in the face by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. This failure resulted in Resident 1 crying and sustaining bleeding and discoloration to her lip. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated September 2023, the admission Record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included Dementia, (an impairment of brain function including loss of memory and judgment); and Alzheimer's disease, (the most common cause of dementia -a gradual decline in memory, thinking, behavior, and social skills which causes the brain to shrink and brain cells to eventually die). During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Progress Notes, dated 5/8/24 at 9:55 p.m., the note indicated, .Resident noted lip bleeding, first aid rendered . During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, IDT-Interdisciplinary Post Event Note [IDT-an interdisciplinary team consists of staff from different…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 6) when Resident 1 and Resident 6 were involved in resident-to-resident altercations and post incident care plans were not developed. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 6 to not receive adequate care and to have unmet psychosocial needs. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2024, with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes changes in a person mood, energy, and ability to function). A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 4/26/24 at 6:29 AM, indicated, . had an altercation with another Resident .claimed [Resident name] threatened to kill her . A review of Resident 6's admission RECORD indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). A review of Resident 6's Progress Notes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were provided for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7 sustained a cervical (neck) fracture on 4/8/24 and her medical provider was not informed until 4/26/24. This failure resulted in a delay of treatment, and placed Resident 7 at risk of improper healing and worsening of her injury. Findings: A review of Resident 7's admission RECORD, indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses which included epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that affects the parts of the brain that control thought, memory and language). A review of Resident 7's Progress Notes, dated 4/8/2024, at 11:18 AM, indicated, .Back from ED [emergency department] .due to a fall this morning .Assisted resident back to bed, check for any alteration in skin integrity but none noted .with new order of Cefdinir [an antibiotic medication used to treat an infection] .Noted and carried out . The note included results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal and physical abuse for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 5), when Resident 3 hit resident 5 on her face and shoulder after Resident 5 shouted and cursed at him to stop staring at her. This failure resulted in physical pain for Resident 5 and the altercation had the potential to diminish the psychosocial well-being of both residents. Findings: According to Resident 3 ' s ' admission Record ' the facility admitted him in 2023 with multiple diagnoses that included head trauma and communication deficit. According to the most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to test memory and recall) contained in his quartely assessment, he scored 10 out of 15 which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 3 ' s ' .Post Event Note ' dated 5/6/24 indicated the event date was on 5/3/24 at 6:35 p.m. when, A female resident [Resident 5] shouted at (name of Resident 3) to stop looking at her while he was passing by . then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents' (Resident 1) needs were accommodated promptly, when Resident 1's call light was not within his reach. This failure had the potential of Resident 1's needs not being met and to cause psychosocial and/or physical harm for Resident 1 when unable to contact staff when needed. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with multiple diagnoses including myocardial infarction (heart attack, usually occurs due to blockage of blood flow to the heart muscle), respiratory failure (inability to breathe normally), weakness, and history of falling. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 2/7/24 indicated Resident 1 needed assistance with daily living activities. Review of Resident 1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was at high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an adequate system for periodically reconciling controlled drugs (substances that have an accepted medical use and have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence), and properly administering medications to meet the needs of the residents for a census 93 when: 1.The facility did not clarify midodrine (medication for hypotension) order parameters and administer midodrine to Residents 45 and 199; and, 2. The facility did not have an adequate system for the Director of Nursing (DON) to accurately periodically reconcile controlled drugs received from the pharmacy by nursing staff to prevent drug diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber). These failures had the potential for Residents 45 and 199 to be inadequately treated for hypotension, and drug diversion of controlled medications after nursing staff received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet food storage and food service standards when: 1. The walk-in freezer door was left open and ice build-up was found at the bottom of the door. 2. Various dry food items were not labeled with the use by date, 3. Various opened spices were not labeled with an open date, 4. Bowls of ready to eat green salads were not covered appropriately, 5. Fruits were not washed prior to peeling, 6a. Dishwasher temperature and the sanitizer readings were not done as scheduled; and, 6b. The red bucket sanitizer readings were not completed as scheduled. These deficient practices had the potential of leading to food-borne illness for the 90 out of 93 residents eating facility prepared foods. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 2/20/24, at 8:47 a.m., with [NAME] 1 in the walk-in refrigerator where the walk-in freezer was located, the freezer door was open and ice build-up at the bottom of the door was found. [NAME] 1 tried to close the freezer door but it would not latch on. [NAME] 1 stated she had to push hard to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal requirement to screen all potential nursing home residents for mental illness and intellectual disability, to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in a nursing home, and to ensure they receive any specialized services that are required) Program for 3 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 41, and Resident 56) when: 1. Resident 13's PASARR Level II recommendations were not implemented, 2. Resident 41's PASARR level I did not include her mental illness diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by abnormal thought processes and an unstable mood); and, 3. The facility did not initiate PASARR level I re-screening when Resident 56 received a mental illness diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes changes in a person mood, energy, and ability to function). These failures had the potential for Resident 13, Resident 41, and Resident 56 to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report to the facility an irregularity related to: 1. Resident 18 was administered valproic acid (suspension for seizure) with no resident diagnosis of seizure, therapy duplication for valproic acid suspension and Depakote DR tablet (antiseizure medications also used to treat mood disorders), a gradual dose reduction (GDR- stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or the medication can be discontinued) was not attempted for Depakote DR tablets, follow up on Resident 18's triglyceride (a type of fat found in blood) critical levels, Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication that alternates brain chemistry to help reduce psychotic symptoms), and nortriptyline were administered unnecessarily; and, 2. Resident 41 was administered Zoloft and bupropion (medications to treat depression) unnecessarily and therapy duplication for Zoloft and Lexapro (medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two out of three residents (Resident 18 and Resident 41) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Resident 18 was administered Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication that alternates brain chemistry to help reduce psychotic symptoms), nortriptyline (medication used to treat depression), and valproic acid suspension/Depakote Delayed Release (DR)tablet (an antiseizure medication also used to treat mood disorders) and the facility did not implement resident specific non-pharmacological interventions. Resident 18 was administered valproic acid with no resident diagnosis of seizure, a consent was not obtained for Resident 18's administration of Zyprexa 10mg (milligram- unit of measure) dose and Zyprexa 10mg was administered unnecessarily, no monitoring of TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone- levels can indicate if thyroid disease present)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater when observation of 25 opportunities during the medication pass resulted in four errors. The calculated medication error rate was 16%. This failure resulted in: 1. Placing Resident 1 at risk of constipation and nicotine withdrawal when Licensed Nurse (LN) 20 did not administer nicotine patch (patch to help quit smoking) and Miralax (medication for constipation). 2. Placing Resident 202 at risk of low levels of magnesium and folic acid when LN 20 did not administer magnesium and folic acid. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an observation on 2/20/24 at 8:38 a.m. in Resident 1's room, LN 20 administered aspirin chewable 81mg (milligram- unit of measure) tablet, docusate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were properly labeled and discarded after the expiration date or discontinued date when: 1. In the [NAME] Wing medication cart, Resident 64's discontinued hydrocodone/acetaminophen (medication used to treat pain) 5-325 mg (milligrams- unit of measure); Resident 16's two latanoprost (medication for high blood pressure in the eyes) bottles, one expired and one with no open or expiration dates; Resident 21's two expired latanoprost bottles; Resident 78's two expired latanoprost and two expired Rhopressa (medication for high blood pressure in the eyes) 0.02% ophthalmic bottles; Resident 33's Lantus (medication for high blood glucose) pen with no open or expiration date; Resident 247's Lantus and Humalog (medication for high blood glucose) pens with no open or expiration dates; Resident 10's two Novolog (medication for high blood glucose) pens with no open or expiration dates, were found not separated from medications that were in use for facility residents. 2. In the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient oversight of the daily food service operations for 90 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 93 when the facility did not employ a full-time Registered Dietitian (RD) or a Certified Dietary Manager/Supervisor (CDS). This failure resulted in inadequate supervision of the dietary department and had the potential for unsafe food practices and food-borne illness for residents who received facility-prepared foods. Findings: During an interview on 2/20/24, at 8:32 a.m. with two Dietary Aides (DA) and a [NAME] in the kitchen, the DA 1 stated the dietary department did not have a CDS for the last two weeks and the RD was not in the building. [NAME] 1 stated she was not the supervisor and did not give orders. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 2/20/24, at 8:47 a.m. with [NAME] 1 and DA 1, multiple issues were identified regarding providing and serving nutritive food (Cross-Reference F804); ensuring food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner (Cross-Reference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for a census of 93 residents when: 1. The facility failed to implement their water management program for monitoring legionella's disease (an illness caused by bacteria which grow in moist areas) and other water borne illnesses when the processes for water treatment were not documented since August 2023. This failure had the potential to allow for water borne illnesses. 2. Licensed Nurse (LN) 20, 24, and 28 failed to appropriately disinfect (to clean and make free of disease-causing organisms) shared glucometers before and after resident care, according to manufacturer's specifications. This failure had the potential to spread infection to other residents. Findings: 1. During an interview on 2/23/24, at 9:15 a.m., with the DOM (Director of Maintenace), he stated their water management program had no evidence it was done after August 2023. During an interview on, 2/23/24, at 10 a.m., the Administrator stated there was no documentation of a water management program being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident preferences regarding life sustaining treatment were accurately reflected in the electronic health record (EHR) for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 48) when Resident 48's code status order (an order whether or not to perform resuscitation in an emergency) in the EHR did not match the code status listed on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- care directives during life threatening situations). This failure had the potential risk of Resident 48's wishes for life sustaining treatment to not be followed. Findings: A review of Resident 48's POLST, dated [DATE], indicated, .Attempt Resuscitation/CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation, lifesaving technique used when a person is not breathing, or their heart has stopped] .Full Treatment . A review of Resident 48's physician order dated [DATE], indicated, .DNR [do not resuscitate], COMFORT TX [treatment] . A review of Resident 48's Progress Notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 47 and Resident 84) were provided timely and specific notification of how their discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services (specialized services provided in a skilled nursing facility) would affect their continued stay at the facility when the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non - coverage (SNF ABN, a form which lists the items or services that Medicare may not pay for, the reason why, and the estimated cost to the resident) was not provided prior to their Medicare A services end date. This failure had the potential for Resident 47 and Resident 84 to be unaware of their potential liability for payment of services not covered under Medicare A and their rights to appeal the decision. Findings: A review of Resident 47's admission RECORD, indicated, she was admitted to the facility in September of 2023. During a concurrent observation and record review on 2/22/24, at 4:50 PM, the Assistant Business Office Manager (ABOM) confirmed Resident 47's SNF ABN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 33) when licensed nurse (LN) 1 did not report to facility administration about Resident 33's allegation of verbal abuse. This failure resulted in a delay of an investigation of the alleged abuse and had a potential to affect Resident 33's psychological well-being. Findings: During an interview 2/20/24, at 11:48 a.m., with Resident 33, Resident 33 stated that Resident 63 banged on the door of his room and called him the 'N word [a derogatory word], a few nights ago and the staff did not do anything. During a review of Resident's 33 record on 2/18/24, at 7 a.m., signed by LN 1 indicated, [Resident 63] had banged on [Resident's 33] door and said FU [a derogatory word] to him. During an interview on 2/20/24, at 4 p.m., the Operations Manager stated he had not been informed of the allegation of verbal abuse of Resident 33 by Resident 63. During an interview on 2/21/24, at 11 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident specific care plan (provides direction on the type of nursing care the resident may need based on their health, medication, mental, and or psychosocial needs) for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 90 and Resident 197) when: 1. Resident 90 did not have a care plan developed for the dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) services she was receiving; and, 2. Resident 197 did not have a care plan developed for the hospice (specialized in end-of-life care for all residents with an advanced, life-limiting illness) services she was receiving. These failures placed Resident 90 and Resident 197 at risk to not have appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to meet their needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 90's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 90 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (the last stage of long-term kidney disease when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently complete quarterly Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, care team consisting of different disciplines who assess and coordinate care), care plan conferences (a meeting which provides opportunities for the resident's and/or their representative, and each discipline to revise the residents care plans) for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 41). These failures had the potential for unmet care needs for Resident 13 and Resident 41. Findings: a. A review of Resident 13's admission RECORD, indicated, she was admitted to the facility in September of 2022. A review of Resident 13's clinical document titled, .IDT-Care Conference Summary ., dated 9/29/22, indicated, .Meeting Type .Initial/admission .Meeting Date and Time 09/29/2022 14:00 [2 PM] . A review of Resident 13's clinical document titled, IDT- Care Conference Summary, dated 12/7/23, indicated, .Meeting Type .Quarterly .Meeting Date and Time 12/07/2023 13:45 [ 1:45 PM] . A review of Resident 13's electronic health record (EHR) showed no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with current professional standards for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 18) when Resident 18 received duplicate medication therapy with the administration of valproic acid suspension (medication for seizure that is also used for mood disorders) for seizures with no diagnosis for seizures, and was also administered Depakote (antiseizure medication also used to treat mood disorders) DR (delayed release) tablets. This failure resulted in unnecessary psychotropic medications (medication that alternates brain chemistry to help reduce mood disorder symptoms) for Resident 18, which increased the potential for medical interactions, adverse reactions, and unidentified risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications including but not limited to sedation, respiratory depression, constipation, anxiety, agitation, memory loss, and death. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/22/24, at 9:37 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 26, Resident 18's undated admission Record, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food (pudding-like texture that is smooth and blended) was prepared in a manner that preserved the nutritional value for thirteen residents who received pureed food from the kitchen when, [NAME] 2 did not follow the recipe for pureed pasta. This failure had the potential to decrease the nutritive value of the pureed food being served. Findings: During an observation of the dinner preparation on 2/21/24, at 3:45 p.m., with [NAME] 2, [NAME] 2 stated she was going to prepare pureed pasta. [NAME] 2 took out a pan of pasta from the steamer and added sauce and melted butter. She then filled the pitcher with pasta and poured the pasta into the blender. She filled half of the pitcher with water from the faucet and poured the water into the blender with the pasta and turned on the blender. [NAME] 2 confirmed she used water to liquify the pasta. [NAME] 2 stated she used water since the pasta had butter. During a review of the facility's undated document titled, RECIPE: PUREED STARCH (RICE, PASTA,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash was properly disposed of for a census of 93, when the facility's dumpster lids were left open. This failure had the potential to attract unwanted pests. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/22/24, at 8:51 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) in the dumpster area located behind the kitchen; there were two dumpsters with both lids left open and one of the dumpsters was overfilled with boxes preventing the lid from closing. The DSD confirmed the lids had been left open and should have been closed to prevent infections, contamination, and from attracting pests. During a review of the facility's undated procedure titled, MISCELLANEOUS AREAS indicated, .Garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed . According to the USDA Food Section 2022 Section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles. Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept covered: (B)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their representatives of the nature and implications of any proposed binding arbitration agreement (a contract between two or more parties that requires them to resolve disputes before an arbitrator, neutral third party, rather than the court system) when the agreements and the right to rescind within 30 days, were not clearly explained to 2 out of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 298). This failure resulted in Resident 4 and Resident 298 or their responsible party (RP) signing the binding arbitration agreement without fully understanding that they were giving up their right to litigation in a court proceeding should a dispute arise and that they had the right to revoke the agreement within 30 days of signing. Findings: During an interview on 2/22/24, at 8:26 AM, the Director of Business Development and Admissions (DBDA) stated the arbitration agreement was reviewed with residents and/or their responsible parties as the last part of their admission packet. The DBDA further stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice services (specializes in end-of-life care for all residents with an advanced, life-limiting illness) were coordinated for one of six residents receiving hospice (Resident 197)when, 1. The facility did not secure a written agreement describing the responsibilities between the hospice agency and the facility prior to initiating care for Resident 197; and, 2. The hospice agency's nurse progress notes and visit information were not in Resident 197's hospice clinical record. These failures had the potential for Resident 197 to not receive proper and appropriate hospice care and services from the facility and the hospice agency; and had the potential for Resident 197's medical record to have insufficient information to reflect the condition, care, and services provided. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 197's admission RECORD indicated Resident 197 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (the last stage of long-term kidney disease when the kidneys can no longer support the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0906 — isolatedProvide enough power supply for lighting all entrances and exits; equipment for fire detection and alarm systems, and extinguishers.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide emergency electrical power on 1/10/24 when the electricity went out and failed to ensure the generator (machine for converting mechanical energy into electricity) safety checks were completed per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). These failures resulted in the facility being without emergency electrical power for 15-20 minutes and could have resulted in harm to 94 residents who reside at the facility. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/23/24, at 9:53 AM, with the Maintenance Director (MD), the generator maintenance logs were reviewed. MD stated there was a major power outage at the facility and the surrounding area on 1/10/24 due to a car accident down the street. MD further stated that during the power outage, the facility's generator failed to automatically turn on for approximately 15-20 minutes. MD explained he was unsure why the generator failed to automatically turn on when the facility's power went out. MD stated he did not have records of the weekly generator checks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on abuse prevention when one of three sampled staff members' employee files (Staff 1) did not contain a background check. This failure allowed for an incomplete employee file and exposed residents of the facility to a staff member who was working and interacting with the vulnerable population without a criminal history background check on file at the facility. Findings: During a review of Staff 1's employee file, a background check was not located. Staff 1 had been employed in the facility since 4/21/21. During an interview on 11/2/23, at 12:15 p.m., with the Administrator, the Administrator confirmed, a copy of Staff 1's background check could not be located. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation undated, indicated, The components of the facility abuse prohibition plan are discussed herein: Screening, A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriate resident property…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three out three rooms sampled (Room A, Room B, and Room C) when: 1. Room A, occupied by three residents, had a broken light fixture, a broken foot board, a broken bedside cabinet, a broken closet door handle, and a broken bathroom window screen. Room A had three soiled divider curtains between the three beds. Room A had red stains on the floor and glass sliding door, the ceiling vent had an accumulation of dust and spider webs, and bed 3 had dried brown stains on the bed frame. 2. Room B, occupied by three residents, had three soiled divider curtains between the three beds. Room B had black grime on the floor behind the bathroom and entry doors. 3. Room C, occupied by three residents, had two broken closet storage drawer handles, and broken tiles under bed 3. These failures resulted in the facility residents not being provided a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment with the potential to negatively impact residents' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection prevention and control measures were practiced for a census of 91 when: 1. Isolation precautions (measures taken to prevent the spread of germs/infections from one person to another) signs were not posted outside COVID positive residents' rooms and isolation precautions were not taken for all COVID positive residents, 2. A staff member did not wear an N95 (type of mask that offers the highest level of respiratory protection) mask in the Alzheimer's Care Unit (ACU) where the facility had COVID positive residents, and staff did not change facemasks after exiting the ACU unit and before entering the non-COVID unit, and 3. Staff were not fit tested (done to ensure a good fit for N95 masks) for N95's. These failures had the potential to spread COVID-19 infection among residents, staff, and visitors that could cause serious illness and/or even death. Findings: 1. During an interview on 9/5/23 at 3:29 p.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) were free from physical abuse from Resident 1. This failure resulted in Resident 2 being slapped in the face and Resident 3 was hit on the arm. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet, indicated she had diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory and judgement), and schizoaffective disorder (a combination of schizophrenia and a mood disorder, which includes hallucinations and delusions). Resident 1 has wandering and aggressive behaviors, such as hitting and yelling at staff. A review of the document titled, S (Situation), B (Background), A (Assessment), R (Recommendation), (SBAR-framework for communication between members of the healthcare team about a patient's condition), indicated, On 7/3/23 at 2:30 p.m., Resident 3 (room [ROOM NUMBER]A) wandered into room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]B) walked up to Resident 3 and punched him in the arm. Afterwhich, Resident 1 wandered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Dietary Services Manager (DSM) was employed in the absence of a full-time Registered Dietitian (DC) for 94 residents who received food from the kitchen. This failure had the potential for the residents' nutritional needs not to be met; and dietary staff were not supervised by a qualified person. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 1/10/23, at 8:23 a.m., with the DSM, the tour revealed unsanitary ovens, clean food preparation equipment stored in an unsanitary environment, loose food debris on shelving and kitchen floors, grime on the floor, and a pipe in the walk-in refrigerator with tape wrapped around it, dripping water into a metal container above where food was stored. (Cross-reference F812). During an interview on 1/11/23, at 9:40 a.m., with the DSM, when asked to see her qualifications for DSM, the DSM stated, I'm not certified. I'm going to start this month . It takes one year to complete . During an interview on 1/11/23, at 9:44 a.m., with the DC, The DC stated, I have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 35 sampled residents (Resident 71, Resident 91, Resident 54, and Resident 13) rights related to treatment choices were known and protected when: 1. There was no evidence an Advance Directive (legal documentation consistent with a person's medical preference when they were no longer able to make decisions for themselves) was discussed and/or offered to Resident 71, Resident 91, and Resident 54; and, 2. Resident 13's code status order (to provide or not provide life saving measures in the event of an emergency) in the electronic medical record did not match the code status listed on the POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment: care directives during life threatening situations), and nursing staff were unaware of how to proceed when a discrepancy was identified. These failures had the potential to result in not determining and/or honoring the residents' wishes related to the provision of medical treatment and health care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete three quarterly care conferences (a meeting which provides opportunities for the residents and/or their representative, and each professional discipline to revise the residents' care plans) for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 23). These failures had the potential for unmet care needs for Resident 23. Findings: A review of Resident 23's admission Record indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses which included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During an interview on 1/11/23, at 8:47 a.m., Resident 23's representative (RR) stated no recent care plan conferences were held for Resident 23. The RR further stated it was a concern to not be involved in Resident 23's plan of care. During an interview on 1/13/23, at 11:38 a.m., Social Services (SS) stated the purpose of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 147 and Resident 395) received adequate supervision to prevent an avoidable accident when: 1. A safe environment was not provided for Resident 147; and, 2. A smoking assessment and smoking care plan were not completed for Resident 395. These failures had the potential to result in an avoidable injury to Resident 147 and Resident 395. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 147's admission Record (a document that contains clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 147 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with diagnoses which included multiple rib fractures on his right side and altered mental status (changes in cognition-process of acquiring knowledge and understanding, mood, and/or behavior). A review of Resident 147's clinical document titled, Fall Risk Evaluation ., dated 1/11/23, indicated, Fall Risk Evaluation 17 .If the total score is 10 or greater, the resident should be considered at HIGH RISK for potential falls . A review of Resident 147's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of thirty-five sampled residents (Resident 27 and Resident 71) when Resident 27 and Resident 71 were not weighed at least weekly. This failure had the potential for weight loss or weight gain to go undetected which could result in a delay of treatment/interventions and have a negative effect on the health of Resident 27 and Resident 71. Findings: During an interview on 1/13/23, at 8:46 a.m., Restorative Nurse Aide (RNA) 1 explained weekly weights were done on all new admissions until the dietician decided the resident could change to monthly weights. RNA 1 stated weekly weeks were scheduled for Monday each week; and RNA 1 was the only staff member who did the weight measurements. RNA 1 stated she did not always work on Mondays, and if she did not work, the weights were not completed by another staff. RNA 1 confirmed she did not obtain missed weights when she returned to work. RNA 1 explained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for a census of 96 when: 1. An Oxygen in use sign was not posted outside of the room for Resident 399, 2. The oxygen flow rate was not followed per physician order for Resident 399 and Resident 3, 3a. Resident 399's oxygen tubing was not dated when last changed; 3b. Resident 3's oxygen tubing was not dated and the oxygen humidifier bottle was empty without a date when changed; and, 3c. Resident 14, Resident 40, and Resident 42's oxygen tubing and/or nebulizer masks were not changed per facility policy. These failures had the potential to result in negative impacts on the residents' health and safety including risks for ineffective oxygen therapy, and respiratory distress. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 399's admission Record indicated Resident 399 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included asthma (a respiratory condition in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication handling, use, and disposition with census of 96 when: 1. There was a discrepancy between the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an accountability record for opioid use) removal and the respective Medication Administration Record (MAR, referred to as a drug chart that serves as a legal record of the drugs administered to a resident) documentation for three residents (Resident 17, Resident 72, and Resident 349). 2. Hazardous medications (medications that may pose harm to individuals handling them based on manufacturer and government guidelines) stored in the facility's [NAME] side medication cart, were not tagged in the MAR as hazardous for nursing staff to wear gloves when handling during administration or dispensing. 3. Disposition of the discontinued non-narcotic medications did not have signatures of the two licensed staff; and the disposal container was wide open and accessible in the facility's main medication room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to carry out a doctor's order for blood thinner medications (a type of medication that prevents blood clot harming the resident) and notify the medical doctor of recurrent missed antibiotic use for one of 96 residents (Resident 88) when: 1. Resident 88's order for enoxaparin (or Lovenox, a blood thinner in the form of a shot or injection) and Resident 88's order for warfarin (a blood thinner given by tablet) for treatment of blood clot, was not carried out as ordered; and, 2. Resident 88's intravenous (or IV- into the vein) antibiotics called daptomycin and ceftaroline (antibiotics used to treat serious blood and wound infection) were not consistently documented in the Medication Administration Record (or MAR- a legal document that lists the medications prescribed and given) as given and the medical doctor was not notified of recurrent missed antibiotic use. These failures resulted in Resident 88 missing warfarin for two days and enoxaparin for five days, and the potential Resident 88 would experience severe complications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for a census of 96 when: 1. Undated and expired medications (spoiled medications that no longer should be used) were stored in the refrigerator in the main medication room (a locked room for storage of medications and supplies). 2. Expired and unlabeled medication stored in the [NAME] side medication cart (a mobile cart containing medications used on daily basis for administration to residents). 3. Expired and unlabeled medications and supplies were stored in two out of two treatment carts (a mobile cart containing medication and supplies for wound and skin diseases). 4. Emergency Kits (Ekit- a sealed box with supply of medications for emergency use) in the refrigerator were marked with expiration dates of 10/2022 and 12/2022 and the Ekit for antibiotic medications were not exchanged for over 2 months after multiple use. These failures may pose unsafe medication use in the facility. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the refrigerator located in the facility's main medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain food safety requirements when: 1. Refrigerated food items were stored in an area that contained a pipe wrapped in tape with a liquid dripping from it into a metal tray in the vicinity of stored food, and contained a brownish slimy fluid with residue; 2. Clean cooking equipment was stored on a surface containing food debris and other unidentifiable debris, and cooking utensils were in containers that had dust and food debris on the outside and on the inside; 3. Kitchen ovens contained loose food debris and burnt in food debris; 4. The kitchen did not have air gaps (a break in the plumbing to prevent unsanitary water from flowing back into the sink) in the food preparation sink and the dishwasher; 5. Kitchen floors contained visible dirt, food products and build up; and, 6. Refrigerator and freezer temperature logs were not kept up to date. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Services Manager (DSM) on 1/10/23, at 8:23 a.m., in the kitchen, the walk in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices for a census of 96 residents when: 1. The laundry services staff did not seperate clean and soiled items in the laundry area, and a ceiling vent fan was dirty and filled with lint; 2. Resident 71 was found with his indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) bag in contact with the floor; and, 3. Resident 88's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a type of long catheter that is inserted through a peripheral vein, often in the arm, passed through to larger veins near the heart and used to give fluids, nutrition, drugs, or other treatments) line dressing was not changed at least weekly. These failures increased the risk of infectious diseases for residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/11/23, at 12:56 p.m., with the Housekeeping/ Laundry Supervisor (HS) in the dirty side of the laundry services area, HS confirmed there were six black trash bags of clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of thirty-five sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 5) were treated with dignity, respect, and in a manner which promoted independence during dining when staff stood over Resident 4 and Resident 5 while assisting them to eat. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 4 and Resident 5's quality of life during mealtime, with a potential for decreased social interaction and loss of appetite. Findings: During an observation on 01/12/23, at 1:14 p.m., in the Memory Care Unit dining room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stood over Resident 5 while feeding them lunch at a table where several other people were seated. During an interview on 01/12/23, at 1:30 p.m., CNA 1 stated Resident 5 required maximum assistance with meals (unable to independently use utensils to eat food). CNA 1 acknowledged standing up to feed Resident 5 the lunch meal while Resident 5 was seated in a wheelchair. CNA 1 stated there were not enough chairs for staff to sit on when assisting with meals. CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of thirty five sampled residents (Resident 71, Resident 68, and Resident 79) were provided with reasonable accommodations of needs when; 1. Resident 68 was not provided with a wheelchair; 2. Resident 79 was not provided a tray table to eat meals from; and, 3. Resident 71's call light was not within reach. These failures resulted in Resident 68 and Resident 79's needs not being met, did not provide a homelike environment, removed the possibility for independent functioning, and had the potential to impact their psychosocial well-being. Resident 71 was not able to use the call light when desired which had the potential to result in physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. During an interview on 1/10/23, at 11:07 a.m., Resident 68 stated that he borrowed his roommate's wheelchair to go to an appointment today. Resident 68 explained his roommate used his walker while he was using his roommate's wheelchair. Resident 68 stated he asked the therapy department for a wheelchair, but was told there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain acknowledgement that the beneficiary notification forms were given to two of three sampled residents (Resident 47 and Resident 59), when the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - a form which indicates that Medicare covered services are ending and how to appeal) and the Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN, a form which gave the choice to continue services under private pay if Medicare did not provide payment) was not mailed to the responsible party (RP) of Resident 47 and proof of sending the forms to Resident 59's RP was not obtained. This failure resulted in Resident 47's RP and Resident 59's RP not having the information available on how to appeal the decision, or have knowledge of the costs to continue treatment in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 47's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in late 2020 with diagnosis which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). No RP was listed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's rights to file a grievance was honored for a census of 96 residents, when grievance forms were not available for residents to use. This failure had the potential for a grievance to not be addressed and removed the right for a resident to file an anonymous grievance at any given time. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/11/23, at 10:56 a.m., the Social Services (SS) stated when residents voice concerns staff would fill out a grievance form and turn it into her. When asked where grievance forms were kept, the SS stated they were located in a box outside of her office and kept at the nurse's station. The SS confirmed the box outside of her office did not contain any grievance forms. The SS stated without forms available, residents would not be able to file an anonymous grievance. During an interview on 1/11/23, at 11 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 5 confirmed there were no grievance forms available at the nurse's station and would obtain a form from social services if one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a mental health diagnosis was accurately reflected in the medical records for one resident (Resident 147) out of 35 sampled residents when: Resident 147 was prescribed a mind-altering medication called quetiapine (also called Seroquel, a medication to treat mental illness) for schizoaffective disorder (a type of mental health with mood swings) and valproic acid (a medication for seizure and mental health) for aggressive behavior, while the documented diagnosis by the Mental Health Doctor (specialist doctor in mental health) was advanced dementia (profound memory loss and/or disorientation) in the medical records. Improperly documented diagnoses may result in unsafe medication use in the facility. Findings: During review of Resident 147's electronic medical record, titled Medication Administration Record (or MAR, a document that listed the prescribed medications given to residents), with date range of 1/1/23- 1/30/23, the following mind-altering medications were prescribed: Quetiapine . Tablet 25 mg (mg is unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate treatment and services were provided for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 64) when Resident 64's elevated blood sugar levels were not reported to the physician in a timely manner. This failure placed Resident 64 at risk for hyperglycemia (blood sugar level higher than the standard range) to be unrecognized and untreated. Findings: Review of Resident 64's admission Record indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2022 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (a condition that results in too much sugar in the blood). During an interview on 1/12/23, at 10:31 a.m., Resident 64 confirmed he took medicine for his diabetes. Resident 64 stated he was always thirsty and was going to the bathroom all the time to void. During an interview on 1/12/23, at 4:18 p.m., licensed nurse (LN) 9 stated he was familiar with Resident 64 and knew the resident was a diabetic. LN 9 stated symptoms of hyperglycemia included being thirsty, fruity breath, and being sweaty. LN 9 further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for two of two residents (Resident 20 and Resident 86) requiring tube feeding (method of providing nutrients via a tube directly into the stomach or intestine when a person is unable to eat by mouth) when: 1. Resident 20's tube feeding container was not changed as indicated, 2. Resident 86's tube feeding container label did not indicate the time the feeding was started; and, 3. Resident 86's physician order for tube feeding was not followed. These failures had the potential for the residents to have complications related to tube feedings and/or risk for infections. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 20's clinical document titled, admission Record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2022, with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) and presence of a gastrostomy (a tube that is surgically inserted into the resident's stomach to allow access for food, fluids, and medications). During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff accurately measured food portions when 3 residents, Resident 59, Resident 31, and Resident 60 did not receive the amount of food required by their diets. This failure had the potential to result in excessive or reduced caloric intake required by the individual resident, negatively impacting the residents' nutritional status, health and well-being. Findings: During a tray line observation and review of the meal tickets (a card for each tray which indicates diet and portions) on 1/12/23, at 12:50 p.m., Resident 59, Resident 31, and Resident 60's meals were plated and the following was observed: Resident 60's meal ticket indicated, Regular 1 1/2 portions, extra bread. Dietary staff plated 1 slice of chicken, 1 and 1/2 slices of bread, 1 and 1/2 scoops rice, 1 scoop vegetables. The cook acknowledged she used a full scoop and poured out some of the food to measure 1/2 a scoop, rather than using a 1/2 scoop measuring cup. Resident 31's meal ticket indicated, Dysphagia Level 3 [difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their Antibiotic Stewardship Program (a program designed for the safe use of antibiotics) for a census of 96 residents when Resident 87 was prescribed an antibiotic treatment without a proper indication. This failure increased the potential for inappropriate antibiotic therapy resulting in the development of antibiotic resistant bacterial infections in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 87's admission Record indicated Resident 87 was admitted to the facility in late 2022. Review of Resident 87's Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated resident took Ciprofloxacin (also known as Cipro, medication used to treat an infection) 500 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for elevated white blood cells (WBC) for ten days. Further review of the document indicated Resident 87 had completed his antibiotic order on 1/10/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/13/23, at 3:44 p.m., Resident 87's clinical health record was reviewed with the Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a total of thirty-three resident rooms. This failure had the potential for an inadequacy of space for provision of care and to limit space for residents' personal belongings. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/14/25, at 8:42 a.m., with the Maintenance Director (MATD), the MATD measured rooms 9, 29 and 31 with the Department to ensure accuracy of the measurements. The MATD provided the following documented room measurements for rooms not meeting the space requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in a shared bedroom: Room Number Occupancy Required/Actual Sq. Ft. Sq. ft per Resident 1 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 2 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 3 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 4 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 5 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 6 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 7 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 8 3 residents 240/220.71 73.57 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-23 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a total of thirty-three resident rooms. This failure had the potential for an inadequacy of space for provision of care and to limit space for residents' personal belongings. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/20/24, at 2:24 PM, the Director of Maintenance (DOM) measured rooms [ROOM NUMBER] with the Department to ensure accuracy of the measurements. The DOM provided the following documented room measurements for rooms not meeting the space requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in a shared bedroom: Room Number Occupancy Required/Actual Sq. Ft. Sq. ft. per Resident 1 3 residents 240/221.1 73.7 2 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 3 3 residents 240/225 75 4 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 5 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 6 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 7 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 8 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 9 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 10 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a total of thirty-three resident rooms. This failure had the potential to limit personal belongings of each resident and inadequacy of space for provision of care to residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/12/22, starting at 7:50 a.m., the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) measured resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER] with the Department to ensure accuracy of the room measurements. The MS provided the following documented room measurements for the resident rooms which did not meet the minimum space requirement of 80 sq. ft per resident in a shared bedroom: Room Number Occupancy Required/Actual Sq. Ft. Sq. ft. per Resident 1 3 residents 240/221.1 73.7 2 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 3 3 residents 240/225 75 4 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 5 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 6 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 7 3 residents 240/223.1 74.4 8 3 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AJC HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWC CA OPCO 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| CHESLEY, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 05/01/2021 |
| MENDOZA, TERESA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/10/2021 |
| GAMETT, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.