Fowler Care Center
8448 East Adams Avenue, Fowler, CA 93625 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 46 certified beds · (559) 834-2519 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.45 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.87 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.19 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the specific competencies necessary to assure residents maintained their highest practicable physical, mental and psychological well-being when Director of Staff Development (DSD) 1 failed to meet the two-year nursing experience qualification. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective staff training, inadequate competency oversight, and negative resident care outcomes. During an interview on 5/7/26 at 11:57 am with DSD 1, DSD 1 stated she had been employed as a Licensed Vocational Nurse as of October 2024 and transitioned to the DSD role on May 1, 2026. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/7/26 at 1:29 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON), Staff Development Coordinator Job Description (JD) dated 2020 and Director of Staff Development Competency Checklist, not dated were reviewed. The JD indicated, Required Qualifications-Minimum requirements include the following: two years of experience as an LPN/RN. The Checklist indicated, 1. Job Description a. Qualification and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient supervision to prevent falls for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as a high fall risk , when Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 4 left Resident 1 unattended in the restroom while retrieving a diaper and Resident 1 got up from the toilet unassisted, lost his balance and fell. This failure resulted in Resident 1's sustaining a left shoulder fracture.During an interview on 4/2/26 at 2:46 pm with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated CNAs should prepare all necessary supplies before helping residents to the restroom. CNA 2 stated residents must not be left alone in the restroom because they could try to stand up, become unsteady, and fall. CNA 2 stated if additional supplies were needed, CNAs should press the call light button in the restroom and wait for help. During an interview on 4/2/26 at 3:19 pm with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated residents should always be supervised in the restroom to prevent the residents from falling. CNA 3 stated if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and ice were stored, prepared, and served safely in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 44 out of 44 residents at the facility when: 1. Honey mustard packets ready for residents' use were expired. 2. Honey mustard packets and frozen sausage pizza toppings were not labeled. 3. A dietary aides personal belonging was observed on the kitchen spice preparation rack. 4. The ice machine water pump (a compartment within the ice machine that carries water) was observed with black spots. These failure resulted to unsafe food handling practices which had the potential risk to caused cross contamination (occurs when harmful bacteria are transferred from one surface or food to anther) and foodborne illness (occurs when a person consume contaminated food or beverages) for the 44 residents at the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/4/25 at 9:32 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen dry storage room, a brown box filled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, comfortable and homelike environment for residents, staff and the public when: 1. Five of six resident rooms did not have a properly functioning screen doors and one screen door was missing. 2. Three of sixteen resident doors were not functioning properly. These failures had the potential of violating residents' rights to their privacy and at risk of accidents which could lead to serious health condition. Findings: 1. During initial tour a concurrent observation and interview on 3/4/25 at 10:38 a.m. with Resident 42 in his room, Resident 42 was sitting at the edge of his bed. Resident was appropriately dressed and answered questions. Resident 42 stated he had problem with his screen door not working and door to his room was heavy and difficult to closed. Resident 42 stated he reported the concerns to the facility and have not fixed the problem. During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, dated 3/6/25, the AR indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for five of six sampled residents (Residents' 1, 39, 40, 41, and 97) when: 1. LVN 1 administered medications to Residents' 39, 40, 41 and 97 without closing the privacy curtain or the door. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 checked Resident 1's blood sugar level (BS-amount of sugar in the blood) without closing the privacy curtain or the door. These failures resulted in Residents' 1, 39, 40, 41, and 97 not provided respect and dignity during care which could potentially impact residents' well-being leading to vulnerability, decreased dignity, anxiety, stress and depression. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/6/25 at 7:55 a.m. in Station 1 East Hall with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 prepared Resident 40's medications and entered Resident 40's room. Resident 40 was lying in bed and inside the room was another resident. LVN 1 administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 10 of 15 sampled residents (Residents 10, 28, 29, 30, 37, 39, 40, 27, 24, and 14) when: 1. Resident's 10, 29, 30, 37, 39, and 40 did not have care plan for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-infection control strategy, involving use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care). These failures placed Residents' 10, 29, 30, 37, 39, and 40 needs not being met. 2. Resident 28 care plan for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-a set of infection control measures that use personal protective equipment [PPE] to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs]). This failure had the potential for Resident 28's needs being unmet. 3. Resident 27's actives care plan lacked person-centered approach for conversation and socializing. This failure had the potential for missed opportunities for emotional and cognitive stimulation. 4. Resident 24's care plan for impaired cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice of quality for eight of nine sampled residents (Resident 12, 10, 30, 39, 40, 29, 37 and 28) when: 1. Resident 12 had a physician's order for a low air loss machine (a medical device used primarily to prevent or treat pressure ulcer (bedsores) and was not provided to Resident 12 and was unplugged. This failure resulted for Resident 12 not receiving the necessary care which could lead to development of pressure ulcer. 2. Resident 10, 30, 39, 40, 29, 37, and 38 needed Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- an infection control measures to reduce the risk of transmission of infections) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not get a physician's order, did not perform a wound assessment and did not initiate a care plan (a personalized, structured document used to outline the care and treatment the residents needs). This failure placed Resident 10, 30, 39, 40, 29, 37, and 38 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent. The facility's medication error was 6.9%. 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not follow medication direction when she administered lactulose solution (medication used to treat constipation) to Resident 40. This failure resulted for Resident 40 not receiving the full therapeutic benefit of the prescribed lactulose solution (medication used to treat constipation) which could lead to constipation or serious health condition. 2. LVN 1 administered metformin (medication used to treat diabetes) medication without food and did not follow the physician's order to administer with food. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 39 to experienced gastrointestinal upset (GI-gastric upset like diarrhea) and could decrease the absorption of Metformin leading to less effective blood sugar control. Findings: 1. During a concurrent medication administration pass observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of infection for 11 out of 11 sampled residents (Residents' 8, 9, 23, 24, 26, 33, 35, 39, 41, 44, and 97) when nursing staff did not provide or assist residents in performing hand hygiene before they were served their lunch tray. This failure to provide hand hygiene placed Residents' 8, 9, 23, 24, 26, 33, 35, 39, 41, 44, and 97 at increased risk for cross contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect). Findings: During an observation on 3/4/25 at 11:50 a.m. during meal observation in the dining room. Residents' 8, 9, 23, 24, 26, 33, 35, 39, 41, 44, and 97 were seen assisted by staff for lunch and staff placed apron on a couple residents. Staff distributed lunch trays to residents and did not provide or offered hand hygiene to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care that promoted rights of the resident and enhancement of quality of life for one of six sampled residents (Resident 147) when resident 147 was not allowed to smoke. This failure resulted in Resident 147 not being able to smoke since admission which led to decreased sense of pleasure and increased anxiety. Findings: During a review of Resident 147's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated 3/6/25, the AR indicated, Resident 147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (a mental health condition characterized by a loss of contact with reality. It is a state of altered perception, cognition, and behavior), major depressive disorder (a common and serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that significantly interfere with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for one of two sampled residents when Resident 12's low air loss machine (designed to distribute patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help skin breakdown) was turned off. This failure had the potential for Resident 12 to develop skin breakdown which could result in pressure ulcer development. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/25 at 9:40 a.m. in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was seen lying in bed, covered with blanket and yelling out. Resident 12 did not answer questions asked. Resident 12's bed was positioned in lowest position and had a low air loss mattress. Resident 12's low air loss mattress was turned off and was unplugged from the wall. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, (AR) dated 3/6/25, the AR indicated Resident 12 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) have the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to ensure residents who required Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) were properly managed to prevent the risk for infections for seven of seven sampled residents (Residents' 10, 30, 39, 40, 29, 37 and 28) when the IP demonstrated a breakdown in following critical infection control policies and procedures. These failures placed Residents' 10, 30, 39, 40, 29, 37 and 28 at increased risk for infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, (AR) dated 3/6/25, the AR indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (high sugar level in the blood), open wound to right knee, open wound to left knee and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive[pertaining to reasoning, memory and judgement] and physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 27) were provided special eating equipment when Resident 27's lunch was not served on an adaptive equipment scoop plate per her meal ticket. This failure resulted in Resident 27's individualized care needs not met which led to difficulty eating, delayed in finishing her meals and the potential risk for decreased oral intake. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated 3/6/25, the AR indicated, Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (complete and partial weakness on the left side of the body following a stroke [blood flow to the brain is decreased, causing brain cells to die]) , chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-air flow obstruction and inflammation of the airways, leading…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement (when a resident, who is incapable of adequately protecting themselves, departs the facility unsupervised and undetected) when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 11/6/24. This failure placed Resident 1 ' s safety at risk when Resident 1 was found on the side of the road a mile and a half away from the facility by staff. Findings: During record review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history), the AR indicated, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included .TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (alteration in brain function caused by an external force such as a blow, bump or jolt to the head) .ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE .SEIZURES (a sudden uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain) .HISTORY OF FALLING .ANXIETY DISORDER (mental health condition that causes excessive and persistent feelings of worry and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 9/2/24. This Failure placed Resident 1's safety at risk when Resident 1 was found on the side of the road half a mile away from the facility by a passing motorist. Findings: During an observation on 9/18/24, at 8:20 a.m., the facility building was surrounded with an 8-foot-tall metal fence. The fence extended entirely around the building and staff & visitors entered and exited the facility through a single locked gate which opened with a key. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/18/24, at 8:40 a.m., with Sitter 1, in Resident 1's room, Sitter 1 was sitting at Resident 1's bedside. Sitter 1 stated she was assigned to provide one-on-one monitoring and supervision for Resident 1. Sitter 1 stated Resident 1 recently eloped. During a review Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 6/16/24. This Failure placed Resident 1's safety at risk when Resident 1 was found walking on the side of the road ½ a mile away from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document containing resident profile information) dated 6/27/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility with diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (TBI, serious injury to the brain that affects problems with how a person thinks, understands, moves, communicates, and acts), and mild cognitive impairment (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 6/26/24, the CP indicated Resident 1 is an elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness, Resident wanders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 5/15/24 at 7:40 PM and was found by the Sheriff's Department on 5/16/24 at 4 AM in the orchard a mile away from the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility without supervision for over eight hours which had the potential to cause injuries. Findings: During an observation on 7/7/24 at 2:35 PM Resident 1 was sitting in the lobby smiling and waving hello to visitors. Resident 1 had an approximately 1-millimeter dot size scabbed on the forehead and on the forearm. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-contains important information about a patient such as their personal details, the reason for admission and medical history), dated 6/10/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury (TBI, serious injury to the brain that affects problems with how a person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and professional standards for food safety when: 1. [NAME] and gray particles were found in the windowsill (ledge on bottom of window) next to the food preparation sink. 2. [NAME] build up was found on the exterior of the dish washing machine. 3. The ice machine and food preparation sink had no air gaps (a vertical space usually one inch or more between the end of a pipe or faucet and the top of a sink which creates a separation between the water supply and contaminated water). 4. The temperature of the dish washing machine was under the minimum 120° Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement) requirement. 5. Oven mitts used to handle hot foods were soiled with orange and brown grime and debris. 6. Food stored in the resident's refrigerator was not labeled with resident's name and use-by-date (the last day for the consumption of food item while at peak quality). These failures had the potential to cause cross-contamination and food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment for residents, staff and the public when: 1.The kitchen dry storage floor had areas of brown stains, missing and cracked linoleum, exposing the cement underneath with accumulation of dark gray debris. 2.The facility floors in the common areas and resident rooms, had black-colored stains, uneven surfaces, cracked linoleum with accumulation of black and brown debris and missing baseboards. This failure to ensure the physical environment was maintained in a safe, clean, and sanitary manner as evidenced by multiple contact surfaces in disrepair placed residents, staff, and the public at potential risk for falls and cross contamination (the process by which bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another with harmful effect) which could lead to foodborne illness (caused by food contaminated with bacteria). Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/12/24 at 9:26 a.m. in the kitchen's dry food storage room, the floor had multiple areas of brown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy and procedure for five of 15 sampled residents (Residents 18, 27, 28, 37, and 39) when the facility did not ensure Resident 18, 27, 28, 37 and 39 were able to submit grievances anonymously. This failure resulted in Residents 18, 27, 28, 37, and 39 not able to exercise their rights to submit grievances anonymously regarding the facility and their care and could negatively affect their pyschosocial well-being. Findings: During the resident council meeting on 3/14/24 at 9:10 a.m. with Residents 18, 27, 28, 37, and 39, Residents 18, 27, 28, 37, and 39 stated they did not know how to file anonymous grievances. Resident 39 stated he did not know how to submit grievances anonymously. During an interview on 3/14/24 at 4:23 p.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated residents must ask staff members for grievance forms. The SSD stated he kept grievance forms in his office, in a drawer behind the nurses' station and in a drawer locked in the Activities Director's (AD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record consistent with professional standards and practices for four of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1, 4, 13, and Resident 34) when Resident 1, 4, 13, and 34's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a medical order signed by both the patient and medical provider that specifies the types of medical treatment a patient wishes to receive toward the end of life) were incomplete. These failures resulted in a medical record that did not reflect Resident 1, 4, 13, and 34's treatments for end-of-life care and services. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/14/24 at 5:11 p.m. with Medical Records Director (MRD), Resident 1's POLST, dated 8/2/23 was reviewed. MRD stated Resident 1's POLST was not completed. MRD stated Resident 1's POLST was missing all the physician's information, which included the physician's name, physician's address, physician's phone number, physician's license number…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one of 27 residents (Resident 28), when Resident 28 was not offered water to rinse her mouth after aerosol oral inhaler (a medication used to prevent difficulty breathing administered by way of inhalation both oral and nasal) administration as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for the inhaler medication to accumulate in Resident 28's mouth and placed Resident 28 at risk to developed oral thrush (fungal infection). Findings: During an observation on 3/13/24 at 8:37 a.m., in Resident 28's room, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) administered aerosol oral inhaler to Resident 28. The DSD did not offer Resident 28 water to rinse her mouth after medication administration. During a review of Resident 28's Order Summary Report, dated 3/13/24 indicated, . 2 puffs inhale orally . rinse mouth with water and spit back into cup after use . During a review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs were labeled with resident identifier and expiration date in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure Labeling Medications and Biological's (a substance such as vaccines or drugs derived from a living organism used for treatment) when one Fluticasone propionate salmeterol inhaler (medications used to treat respiratory disease, a mist or spray that the patient breathes in the nose or mouth) and one nasal spray ( liquid medicine spray into the nose) medication was stored in medication cart 1 without a resident identifier label (resident's name and date of birth ) and expiration date. This failure placed residents at potential risk for receiving the wrong medication and expired medications, which could lead to medication ineffectiveness and medication adverse reaction. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/14/24 at 11:13 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), in front of the nurse's station, medication cart 1 stored one inhaler medication and one nasal spray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure to monitor and maintain essential equipment in a safe operating condition for one of six residents, (Resident 4), when Resident 4's oxygen concentrator (a medical device to deliver oxygen) was not routinely monitored and maintained in accordance with facility policy and procedure. This failure had the potential for Resident 4's oxygen concentrator to break down and fail which could result in Resident 4 going without oxygen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/13/24 at 8:54 a.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 4's room, Resident 4's oxygen concentrator had gray particles on the surface. CNA 1 stated the oxygen concentrator had a lot of dust and should be cleaned. CNA 1 stated maintenance was responsible to ensure the oxygen concentrator was clean. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/14/24 at 12:15 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 4's room, LVN 1 opened the oxygen concentrator filter cover and LVN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functioning communication system (call light system-an alerting device used by residents to request assistance from nursing staff) for 17 residents bed (3 C,4 B, 7 D, 9 A,B,D 10 C,D 11 A,B,C 12 A,B,C 14 A,B,C) out of 46 residents bed when the patient call light system warning lights above residents doorway and monitoring panel located in the nurses station to indicate when patients have perceived needs requiring attention were not functioning properly. This failure resulted for residents in the facility not able to call for help and receive immediate assistance from nursing staff which placed residents ' health and safety at risk. Findings: During an interview on 1/16/24 at 10:10 a.m., with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated he conducted daily inspections for all the call lights in residents ' room for proper functioning. The MS stated when residents pressed the call light button, the warning lights above resident ' s doorway and the monitoring panel located in the nurse ' s station must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 met the specific certification requirements when CNA 1 was working in the facility without an active CNA certification. This failure had the potential for Residents not being provided adequate and quality care according to their needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 11:15 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility document titled, Active Employees (AE) dated [DATE] was reviewed. The AE indicated, CNA 1 ' s Certified Nursing Certificate had an expiration date of [DATE]. The DON stated CNA 1 ' s certificate expired on [DATE] and CNA 1 was not scheduled to work until her certificate was active. During a review of the facility document titled CNA NOC Shift [DATE], the document indicated, CNA 1 was on the schedule to work on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] [DATE], and [DATE] for the night shift. During a review of the facility document titled Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food service staff were able to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively when Kitchen staff (CKA 1, CKA 2, and KA 1) did not air dry bowls and cups prior to storage, did not label opened food products with use by date, did not place a drip pan on thawed uncooked frozen meat inside the refrigerator, and did not perform appropriate glove use in the kitchen. Failure to have staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services can result in foodborne illnesses from cross contamination or the growth of microorganisms for the 44 residents eating food prepared in the facility. (Cross Reference F812) Findings: During a concurrent observation on 5/1/23, at 9:15 a.m., inside the kitchen, with Cook/Kitchen Aide (CKA), CKA 1 placed a tray of wet bowls inside the cabinet. CKA 1 lifted the bowls and water dripped from the bowls, and stated, the bowls were wet. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/1/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food safety guidelines were followed when, 1. Cake stored inside the kitchen refrigerator was not fully covered and placed on top of a torn cardboard boxes with moisture stains. 2. Cheese slices and whipped cream were placed inside unsealed plastic bags stored inside the kitchen refrigerator. 3. Wet bowls and cups were stacked and stored inside the cabinet. 4. Cooking spices were stored unsealed and in containers with debris. 5. Opened bag of frozen sausage patties was in the freezer without an opened date. 6. Five meal tray carts were stored in the kitchen storage room with 44 uncovered meal trays, and a bag of plastic forks placed on the top of a plate, more than two hours before meal service. 7. The kitchen backdoor was fully open without a closed-door screen during food preparation. 8. Uncooked frozen chicken thighs inside a cardboard box was thawed in the bottom of the refrigerator without a drip pan (a pan placed underneath thawed frozen food to catch the drippings and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, when a dead cockroach was found on a glue trap (a trap that uses glue, adhesive material as the mode of capture to trap rodents and insects) in the food storage room and dead insects were found on the kitchen windowsills above the food preparation area and dish sink. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and parasites) in a medically vulnerable resident population of 44 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: During an observation on 5/1/23, at 9:15 a.m., in the kitchen, the back door is fully open without a door screen while food is being prepared. During an observation on 5/1/23, at 9:42 a.m., inside the food storage room, one dead cockroach was captured in the glue trap. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/1/23, at 9:52 a.m., in the food storage room, with the Dietary Aide (DA) 1, DA 1 stated, the cockroach should not be inside the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, during the survey period of 5/1/23 to 5/8/23, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in 10 out of 17 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable accommodations for privacy or adequate space for care to be rendered. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) and Housekeeping Supervisor on 5/4/23, at 10:58 a.m., the DOM stated he was aware ten rooms did not meet the minimum square footage required. The room measurements were as follows: Room # Square Feet Number of residents 1 156.18 2 2 157.20 2 5 215.68 3 6 214.27 3 11 216.02 3 12 216.56 3 14 217.96 3 15 156.83 2 16 156.96 2 17 157.20 2 During multiple observations made between 5/3/23 to 5/8/23, and the residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. The residents had closets and bedside tables which provided adequate storage space. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents was treated with respect and dignity for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when staff shaved Resident 2 in the hallway without providing privacy. This failure violated Resident 2's right to be treated with respect and dignity and had the potential to cause embarrassment. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's face sheet titled, admission Record, (document containing resident personal information), undated, the face sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, cerebral infarction (stroke caused by disrupted blood flow to the brain), urinary tract infection (infection in any part of the urinary system [kidneys, bladder, or urethra]), contracture (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes deformity of the joints), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar levels),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO- a person who routinely visits the facility and advocates for the residents) when one of two sampled residents (Resident 47) was transferred to the acute care hospital. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 47 not having an advocate who could inform them of their admission, transfer, and discharge rights and options. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 5/8/23, at 10:46 a.m., with the Director of Medical Records (DMR), Resident 47's Transfer Form (TF), dated 2/28/23 was reviewed. The DMR stated, he was unable to find documentation of LTCO notification when Resident 47 was transferred to the acute care hospital. The DMR stated, during the time when Resident 47 was transferred to the acute care hospital the facility did not have a Director of Social Services (DSS). The DMR stated, it was the responsibility of the DSS to notify the LTCO when Resident 47 was transferred to the acute care hospital. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of healthcare and functional needs) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of four sampled residents (Resident 23) when Resident 23 who was nonverbal and was coded as comatose (a state of deep unconsciousness for a prolonged period, the person's eyes will be closed and unresponsive to their environment) in the MDS assessment. These failures resulted in an inaccurate assessment of Resident 23's mental status and had the potential for Resident 23's needs to go unmet. Findings: During an observation on 5/1/23, at 10:30 a.m., Resident 23 was lying in bed with eyes open. Resident 23 did not respond when spoken to. During an observation on 5/1/23, at 12:48, in Resident 23's room, a nursing staff was feeding Resident 23 with a puree diet (food with a pudding-like consistency). During a review of Resident 23's MDS, dated 3/21/23, the MDS section B, (a section in the MDS which assessed hearing, speech, and vision), indicated Resident 23 was . Comatose . no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was implemented timely for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 30) when Resident 30 had a diagnosis of contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and had a physician order for a left hand splint (a device used to support the hand and wrist in best position while resting and to help reduce swelling and pain) with no implementation of a comprehensive care plan. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 30's care needs going unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's face sheet, titled admission Record (document containing resident personal information), undated, the face sheet indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, Hereditary and idiopathic (unknown cause) neuropathy (nerve problem that causes pain, numbness, tingling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for two of three sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 30) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) used an unapproved medication administration technique while using an insulin flex pen (a device used to inject insulin [hormone- regulatory substance made by the body to control blood sugar production]) during a medication pass observation. This failure placed Resident 18 at risk for dosing errors and had the potential for adverse side effects such as hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). 2. License Nurse (LN) failed to perform a change of condition assessment and documentation for Resident 30's complained of burning with urination. This failure had the potential for Resident 30's change of condition not being addressed by the nursing staff which could lead to delayed in treatment and services. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 5/2/23, at 9:27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 30) received appropriate equipment to prevent further decline in mobility and range of motion when Resident 30 had a diagnosis of contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and nursing staff failed to apply Resident 30's left hand splint (a device used to support the hand and wrist in best position while resting and to help reduce swelling and pain) according to physician's order. This failure resulted in the potential risk for Resident 30's left hand contracture to worsen, which could lead to further declined in mobility and range of motion, and increased dependence for activities of daily living. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's face sheet titled, admission Record,(AR- is a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance which includes contact details, a brief medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals (a substance such as vaccines or drugs derived from a living organism used for treatment) were labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for five of 23 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 5, Resident 15, Resident 18 and Resident 21) when: 1. Resident 5's linaclotide (a medication used to treat irritable bowel syndrome [an intestinal disorder causing pain in the belly, gas, diarrhea, and constipation] with constipation) with an expired date of 1/23/23 was stored in Medication Cart 1 ready for residents used. 2. Resident 15's insulin glargine open date and use by date was incomplete and did not indicate the year. Resident 15's medication Phenylephrine-Cocoa Butter (a medication used to temporarily relieve swelling burning, pain and itching caused by hemorrhoids [a swollen vein or group of veins in the region of the anus]) with an expired date of 4/23/23 was stored in Medication Cart 1 ready for residents used. These failure had the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 26) when Resident 26's Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a specific medical orders for resident treatment and wishes in the case of a medical emergency) for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- is a medical order written by a doctor which instructs health care providers not to do resuscitation [the action of reviving someone from unconsciousness or apparent death] if a patient's breathing stops or if the patient's heart stops beating) was not signed. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 26's decisions regarding his healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR- is a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance which includes contact details, a brief medical history and the patient's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program when one of two sampled residents (Resident 29) nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increase airflow through the nose to a person in need of respiratory help) was on the floor and not stored inside a plastic bag. This failure placed Resident 29 at risk for cross-contamination (the physical transfer of harmful germs from person, object or place to another) and to developed respiratory infection (when germs enter the body, usually through the mouth or nose) from using contaminated nasal cannula. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record(AR- is a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance which includes contact details, a brief medical history and the patient's level of functioning, along with patient preferences and wishes), dated 5/2/23, the AR indicated, Resident 29 had the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a condition involving constriction of the airways and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, during the survey period of 3/4/25 to 3/7/25, the facility failed to provide and maintain a minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident room for 10 out of 16 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 & 17). This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for not having sufficient space to accommodate their needs, privacy, and comfort. Findings: Resident rooms 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 & 17 did not meet the required square footage requirements; however, the residents had privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver did not adversely affect the health and safety of any of the residents residing in these rooms. Room # Square Feet Number of Residents 1 155.32 sq ft 2 2 157.25 sq ft 2 5 218.41 sq ft 3 6 215.63 sq ft 3 11 218.55 sq ft 3 12 218.01 sq ft 3 14 219.46 sq ft 3 15 157.83 sq ft 2 16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, during the survey period of 3/12/24 to 3/15/24, the facility failed to provide and maintain a minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident room for 10 of 16 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, & 17). This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for not having sufficient space to accommodate their needs, privacy, and comfort. Findings: Resident rooms 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, & 17 did not meet the required square footage requirements; however, the residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver did not adversely affect the health and safety of any of the residents residing in these rooms. Room # Square Feet Number of Residents 1 156 square feet 2 2 156 square feet 2 4 253 square feet 4 5 221 square feet 3 6 221 square feet 3 11 221 square feet 3 12 221 square feet 3 14 221 square feet 3 15 156 square feet 2 16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AJC HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOWLER CARE CENTER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/17/2019 |
| SWC CA OPCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| CHESLEY, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2021 |
| SMITH, PHYLICIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| GAMETT, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555918. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.