No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Feather River Care Center

1 Gilmore Lane, Oroville, CA 95966 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (530) 534-1353 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$59,794 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $59,794 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
John Clay0.1 mi
2767 Olive Hwy · (530) 534-1334 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2721 Olive Hwy · (530) 534-9811 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2257 Oroville Quincy Hwy · (530) 533-1780 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2821 Wyandotte Ave · (530) 533-2011 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.9%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.7%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.3%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.562.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.791.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.3%CMS range 31.1–49.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.7%CMS range 11.2–18.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.8–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
58.2%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-21)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

80 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a system was implemented to alert staff when residents exited the building onto the outside resident patio area. This affected 1 (Resident #26) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. On 09/20/2023 at approximately 3:00 AM, Resident #26 exited the facility without staff's knowledge and sustained a fall. It was determined the provider's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25(d) Accidents, at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 09/20/2023 at approximately 3:00 AM when Resident #26 exited the facility without staff's knowledge and sustained a fall. The Administrator and Clinical Resource Nurse were notified of the IJ and provided a copy of the IJ template on 01/08/2024 at 1:40 PM. A Removal Plan was requested. The Removal Plan was accepted by the State Survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect two of two sampled Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) while performing wound care when the cleaning and sanitizing of the surgical scissors was not done between each use.This failure had the potential to cause widespread infection among the residents.Findings:A review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment dated 1/1/2026, indicated, Staff Shall follow established infection control principles for cleaning and disinfecting reusable; non-critical equipment general guidelines include.d. Multiple resident use equipment shall be cleaned and after each use.A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty walking, need for assistance with personal care, diabetes and pressure ulcer of the left heel. A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure protection from sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 touched Resident 1's side of the body on 12/20/25, and touched Resident 1's chest area on 12/22/25These failures led to the compromised safety of Resident 1 and had the potential to affect Resident 1's emotional and psychosocial well-being as well as putting other residents at risk.Findings:During a record review of facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 2025, indicated Abuse means the willful infliction of injury.intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include.certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) for one of 3 sample residents (Resident 1), when a staff member witnessed Resident 2 touch Resident 1's side of body on 12/20/25.This failure led to the compromised resident safety and contributed to a subsequent incident on 12/22/25, when Resident 2 was witnessed with a hand on Resident 1's chest area.During a record review of facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 2025, indicated Abuse means the willful infliction of injury.intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include.certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse. Facility policy also indicated The facility will make efforts to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that four out of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) had an individualized smoking safety care plan that identified smoking-related risks, resident-specific interventions, and safety measures. Despite the facility's knowledge that these residents smoked, there was no documented care-planning process to address smoking supervision, designated smoking location, safety precautions, or ongoing evaluation and revision of the plan of care.This failure resulted in residents not receiving individualized, person-centered care related to smoking safety, with smoking-related risks remaining unrecognized and unmet, and had the potential to place residents at risk for decline in health status, including injury or other adverse outcomes.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Smoking - Smoke-Free Facility, revised 12/1/25, the policy stated that any resident deemed safe to smoke, with or without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and enforce its smoking policy when four of four residents were identified as smokers and the facility did not establish a designated smoking area as required by facility policy.This had the potential to place residents who smoke at increased risk for injury due to smoking in undesignated areas.During a review of the facility's Resident Smoking Policy, dated 12/01/25, the policy indicated that residents deemed safe to smoke, with or without supervision, are permitted to smoke only in designated smoking areas, at designated times, and in accordance with the resident's individualized care plan.During a review of the facility's Resident Smoking - Smoke-Free Facility Policy, dated 12/01/25, the policy indicated that smoking, including the use of electronic cigarettes, is prohibited in all areas except the designated smoking area, and that a designated smoking area sign will be prominently posted.During an interview on 12/17/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) remained free from restraint when a staff member restrained Resident 1 upright in a wheelchair. This placed Resident 1 at increased risk for injury, accident, and negative health outcomes.Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, revised 2025, indicated the facility Prohibits the use of physical restraint for discipline or staff convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which medical symptoms warrant the use of such restraints. The policy defined Physical restraint to include the following example: Tucking in a sheet tightly so the resident cannot get out of bed . fastening fabric or clothing so that a resident's freedom of movement is restricted. The policy further clarified; Falls do not constitute . a medical symptom that warrants the use of physical restraints. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, this requirement was not met when the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Vocational Nurse's (LVN 1's) license was current. This resulted in a potential lapse in administrative oversight of requirements for licensure, and the potential for medical error or harm.A review of the facility's policy titled License Verification dated 2025 indicated, All personnel that require a license or certification shall be verified through the appropriate issuing agency, and, 1. The Human Resources Director, or designee, is responsible for maintaining and ensuring the validity and current status of individual certification/licensure. The policy further stated, Any licensed/certified employee is responsible for maintaining continuing education hours as required for current licensure/certification status.A review of the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians licensure report for LVN1 indicated that LVN1's Vocational Nursing license was inactive, License is inactive, licensee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for three of three residents when:Resident 1's care plan was not updated with a 24 hour 1:1 monitor (where one staff member is assigned to continuously monitor a single resident for behaviors, needs, etc.) and visual checks every 15 minutes at night.Resident 2's care plan did not state an intervention of a 1:1 monitor.Resident 3's care plan did not state an intervention of a 1:1 monitor.This failure had the potential to result in physical and/or psychosocial harm to other residents and staff.During a record review of facility policy titled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change dated August 2024, indicated the comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. Facility policy further indicated the care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. Facility policy also indicated care plans will be modified as needed by the MDS coordinator or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2) was protected from physical abuse when Resident 3 hit Resident 2 with a closed fist which resulted in a bruised right eye. This failure caused Resident 2 to feel anger and discomfort, and had the potential to result in emotional stress, embarrassment, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of the facility's policy revised 2025, titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, indicated it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse included, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also included controlling behavior through corporal punishment. This facility's policy also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility's nursing staff failed to recognize and report a change in condition for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure caused Resident 7 to have a delay in acute care treatment required, and the need for new placement after a hospitalization related to the lack of communication when Resident 7 had a change in condition.A review of the facility's policy revised 8/2024, titled, Notification of Changes, indicated the purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. During a review of Resident 7's medical record, the admission Record, indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular and fast heart beat), aortic valve disorder (a major heart valve that narrows, decreases blood circulation),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 69 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, this facility failed to accommodate the need to communicate with of one (Resident 1) of four sampled residents when the facility failed to provide any means of translation to a Hmong only speaking resident. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being properly assessed and Resident 1's pain was not treated. Findings: A record review of Resident 1's face sheet indicated an admission date of 4/24/25 for hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a condition characterized by weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (tissue death caused by a lack of blood supply to the affected area) affecting right dominant side, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 1 was her own representative. The only language Resident 1 speaks was Hmong. During an interview on 5/9/25 at 11:10 am of Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated that the facility does not have any way of translating for their non-English speaking residents. By a record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, this facility failed to address and treat the pain of one (Resident 1) of four sampled residents when Resident 1 had an accident in the shower chair, sustained an injury, and complained of pain. This resulted in a complete omission of pain treatment and management and Resident 1 suffering without any pain relief. Findings: A policy titled Pain Management (Undated), indicated that the facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan . This policy defines acute pain as pain that is usually sudden onset and time-limited with a duration of less than one month and often is caused by injury . The facility will: 1. Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated and evaluate the resident for pain, during ongoing scheduled assessments, and when a significant change in condition occurs. 2. Facility staff will observe for nonverbal indicators…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, this facility failed to ensure licensed staff the competencies and skill set necessary to provide nursing care for one (Resident 1) of four sampled residents when: Nursing staff did not assess and document when Resident 1 had an accident and sustained an injury. Nursing staff did not complete a change in condition or alert the physician. There was no care plans completed to address the accident and injury Resident 1 had. This resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the treatment and pain relief needed for Resident 1's injury. Findings: A record review of Resident 1's face sheet indicated an admission date of 4/24/25 for hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a condition characterized by weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (tissue death caused by a lack of blood supply to the affected area) affecting right dominant side, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 1 was her own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) from abuse when Resident 2 was pushed out of her wheelchair to the floor by Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to Resident 2. Findings: A review of the undated facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation indicated It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing, and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility policy indicated, III. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, D. The identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of resident with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect. A review of Resident 1's record indicated he was transferred from a skilled nursing facility and admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, evaluation for serious mental illness and intellectual disability,) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) during an admission from another Skilled Nursing Facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive a plan of care to meet his behavioral and mental health needs. Findings: An undated copy of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment – Coordination with PASRR Program indicated, This facility coordinates assessments with the readmission screening and resident review (P ASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), had a comprehensive care plan that was person-centered to meet his mental health needs. This failure resulted in a resident-to-resident altercation and a transfer to the hospital for suicidal ideation. Findings: A review of the undated facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans indicated it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. A review of Resident 1's record indicated he was transferred from a skilled nursing facility and admitted to the new facility on 3/31/25 with diagnoses which included stroke affecting right dominant side and depression unspecified. A review of Resident 1's transfer record included a nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 had a behavioral health evaluation and services to meet Resident 1's psychiatric behavioral needs. This failure resulted in a resident-to-resident altercation and a transfer to the hospital for suicidal ideation. Findings: A review of Resident 1's record indicated he was transferred from a skilled nursing facility and admitted to the new facility on 3/31/25 with diagnoses which included stroke affecting right dominant side and depression unspecified. A review of Resident 1's transfer record included a nurse practitioner note dated 3/17/25 at 1:33 pm, indicated he had Bipolar II disorder (cycle of mood swings from high to low) continue sertraline (medication for depression). Social Service Assistant notes indicated Resident 1 had four appointments with psychology on 03/17/25, 3/20/25, 3/24/25, and 3/27/25 before transfer to another skilled nursing facility. A review of Resident 1's PASRR dated 11/4/24 done at the previous SNF admission,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the conservator (an individual appointed by a court to oversee the mental health care of an individual with a serious mental illness who is unable to make decisions themselves) of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers in advance of a medication change for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 was receiving Clozapine (medication used to treat severely ill patients with Schizophrenia who have used other medicines that did not work well) for her diagnosed Schizophrenia (a chronic mental health disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) prior to her admission to the facility and upon admission to the facility on 7/22/2024, and it was placed on hold for an unknown reason from 8/3/2024 until discharge from facility on 10/25/2024, without conservator knowledge. This deficient practice caused a decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan with a 1:1 monitor (where one staff member is assigned to continuously monitor a single resident for behaviors, needs, etc) for one of four residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 walked past Resident 2 and hit him in the back of his head. This failure had the potential to result in physical and/or psychosocial harm to other residents. Findings: A record review of facility policy titled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change copyright 2024 indicated the care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. Facility policy further indicated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of facility healthcare professionals who collaborate to provide comprehensive care to residents) will discuss the resident condition and collaborate on intervention options and the care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. A record review of Resident 1's admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment when: 1a. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I wore the same isolation gown (worn over clothing and used to prevent the spread of infection) while providing care to Resident 24 (who was diagnosed with Clostridium difficile, C-diff, a bacterium that caused diarrhea, was spread from person to person by direct contact, could cause serious illness, hospitalization, or even death) and Resident 23 (who was not diagnosed with C-diff); and 1b. There was no dedicated cleaning equipment for Resident 24's bathroom; and 2. The nurse's station counter was chipped and not able to be disinfected. These failures had the potential to spread infection. Findings: 1a. A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Management of C. Difficile Infection, indicated, the use of isolation gowns would be used as a method to prevent the spread of C-diff. A review of the admission Record, dated 7/9/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to privacy were protected for five out of 13 residents sampled for patient rights, (Resident 33, Resident 18, Resident 22, Resident 8, and Resident 5), when Resident 20 entered their room uninvited. This had the potential to make Resident 33, Resident 18, Resident 22, Resident 8, and Resident 5 feel unsafe in their room, and their privacy to be disrespected. Findings: The facility's policy, undated, titled Resident [NAME] of Rights, Sec. 483.10 Resident Rights (e), indicated personal privacy is a right and (1) personal privacy includes accommodations. A review of Resident 33's clinical record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting left side (nervous system disorders that cause weakness on one side of the body), frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction (complications after a stroke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment to one out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 201) when Licensed Nursing (LN) did not accurately assess the condition of Resident 201's feet, create a care plan (written plan that described needed care and how care would be provided), and the physician was not notified of the condition of Resident 201's feet. This failure had the potential to negatively impact resident health status and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Skin Integrity-Foot Care, indicated, residents would receive proper foot care .to maintain mobility and good foot health. The P&P indicated, The comprehensive assessment will include an assessment of the feet for disorders which may require treatment The P&P indicated, Medical conditions will be managed, and interventions will be implemented in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent complications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (Resident 20) when: 1. The shower room door was left unlocked which resulted in Resident 20 wandering into the shower room unsupervised and having a fall. 2. Resident 20 was not on one-to-one supervision every 30 min as described as an intervention in his care plan. 3. Resident 20 was exhibiting wandering behavior, and it was not captured on his Minimum Data Set (MDS, a data driven clinical assessment) assessment. These failures resulted in Resident 20 being unsupervised and falling out of his wheelchair and wandering in other resident rooms which had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 20's physical and social wellbeing. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Elopements and Wandering Residents (undated), indicated This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering (random or repetitive locomotion [movement] that may be goal-directed or aimless) behavior and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of one newly admitted sampled resident (Resident 201) was provided with medical related social services when a referral for a follow up appointment with vascular surgeon (a surgeon that specialized in diseases of the veins and arteries also known as blood vessels) was not done. This had the potential for a decline in health status for a resident that recently suffered a stroke (occurred when something blocked the blood vessel that supplied blood to the brain). Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Social Services, indicated, The facility, regardless of size, will provide medically related social services to each resident, to assist in attaining or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The P&P indicated, the social worker would perform an initial assessment of each resident, identify needs, and document them in the medical record. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and orderly environment in the dietary department when there was an unlabeled storage bin and four storage bins with visible dust and adhesive tape residue accumulated on the lids. These failures had the potential to lead to the spread of infections, communicable diseases, and food borne illness to all residents who are served out of this kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Ingredient Bins dated 2018, the policy indicated Ingredient bins must be kept clean and covered to prevent food contamination. Scrub the interior and exterior of the bin with detergent solution. Pay special attention to the corners, lids and casters (wheels). A review of the facility's policy titled Labeling and Dating of Foods dated 2020, the policy indicated All food items in the storeroom, refrigerator, and freezer need to be labeled and dated. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/18/25 at 11:17 am, the following were observed in the dry food storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0911 — isolated
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that all their bedrooms accommodated no more than four residents. This had the potential to result in residents not reaching and maintaining their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am, room [ROOM NUMBER] had five beds. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. The room had adequate storage space, mobility and the provision of care for 5 residents. During an interview with the Administrator on 3/21/25 at 8:36 am, he stated that he would continue the waiver renewal request.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 4) had access to the resident call system when the call light was not within reach. This failure had the potential to cause a delay in care and could endanger Resident 4's health and safety. Findings: A review of the facility's undated, policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, indicated, call lights would be placed at the bedside so residents could call for assistance. The P&P indicated, Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. The P&P indicated, residents would be evaluated for needs and preferences .to determine any special accommodations that may be needed in order for the resident to utilize the call system. A review of Resident 4's admission Record, dated 12/2/23, indicated, admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a disease that affected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) was treated with dignity and respect during communication with an employee when asking about lost clothing. This failure caused Resident 3 to feel angry, and had the potential to result in emotional stress, embarrassment, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of a policy revised 2024, titled, Resident Rights, indicated the resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The resident has the right to: Voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished; and the behavior of staff and of other residents; and other concerns regarding their LTC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) needs were accommodated when a second bedside table was removed from her room that stored art supplies used daily. This failure resulted in Resident 3 becoming frustrated, angry, and violated the right to accommodate specific resident needs. Findings: A review of a policy revised 2024, titled, Resident Rights, indicated the resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including: The right to retain and use personal possessions, including furnishings, and clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents. The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents. A review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) was revised and updated to reflect current individual needs for pain management. This failure resulted in the resident ' s individual care needs to go unrecognized, and the potential for a further decline in resident ' s physical, mental, and psychological status. Findings: During a review of a policy revised 8/2024, titled, Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. Staff involved in the care of the resident will report resident response to new or modified interventions. During a review of a policy revised 8/2024, titled, Pain Management,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete daily hair care for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, frustrated, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy revised 8/2024, titled, Hygiene, Grooming, and Activities of daily Living (ADLs), indicated care and services will be provided for the following Adls: bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, transfers, ambulation, toileting, and eating. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. A review of the facility ' s policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, revised 2/2023, indicated, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident rights for 6 out of 6 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5and 6) when nursing staff failed to safeguard the resident ' s dignity and respect when they ignored call lights, calls for assistance, and failed to administer pain medications in a timely manner for Resident 2. These failures resulted in residents feeling angry, sad, scared, and with an increase in anxiety and pain. Findings A review of a policy and procedure titled, Resident Rights, copyrighted in 2024, states that a resident has the right to a dignified existence and self-determination. The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, and a right to a safe, comfortable homelike environment, including support for daily living. A review of a policy and procedure titled, Pain Management, copyrighted in 2023, states that the facility must ensure that pain management is provided to resident ' s who require such services. The facility will utilize a systematic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment, and monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility did not meet this requirement when three of eight sampled residents (Residents 1, 4, and 5) stated their soiled briefs were not changed in a timely manner, including one resident (Resident 1) being left wet for approximately 12 hours until the next day's shift reported for duty. This had the potential to result in negative health outcomes (infection, illness), skin breakdown, and residents' loss of dignity. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living dated 2023 indicated: The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care; 2. Transfer (moving between two places) and ambulation (walking); 3. Toileting. Review of the facility's record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to meet this regulation when two of eight sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) reported to the facility that Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN A) spoke to them in a disrespectful manner; that LVN A threatened to withhold medication from Resident Two; residents indicated they were fearful of him. This had the potential to result in psychosocial (mental) harm, pain, and adverse medical outcomes. Findings: A review of the facility's Employee Handbook (undated), provided by the facility's administrator on 6/28/24, indicated policy as follows: We are a service business and all of us must remember that while the resident is not always right, the resident is never wrong, and, Our residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal [physical] punishment, neglect, and involuntary seclusion; and, Residents are to be treated courteously and always given proper attention. Never regard a resident's question or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, this requirement was not met when a staff member closed the room door for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3), and silenced the resident's call light. This resulted in the potential for psychological harm and adverse outcomes and was contrary to the facility's stated policy. Findings:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility 4/29/24 for respiratory failure, a worsening brain disease, anxiety, need for assistance with personal care, and difficulty communicating. The resident had a history of calling out loudly from her room and a history of being fearful of confinement following trauma from a local wildfire disaster. A review of Resident 3's Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated that her score was 2, Severe cognitive impairment. A review of the facility's Employee Handbook policy (undated), provided by the facility's administrator on 6/28/24, indicated policy as follows: We are a service business and all of us must remember that while the resident is not always right, the resident is never wrong, and, Our…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was treated with dignity and respect while eating meals. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 2's psychosocial well-being and did cause Resident 2 to become frustrated. Findings: The facility ' s policy dated 2/2023, titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, indicated it is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident ' s quality of life by recognizing each resident ' s individuality. This facility ' s policy also indicated all staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights and respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. During a review of Resident 2 ' s medical record, the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for wound care were obtained upon admission to the facility for one of three residents, (Resident 2) sampled for new admission. This failure had the potential for a negative clinical outcome, re-hospitalization, and Resident 2 did have specific needs that were not identified in a timely manner. Findings: The facility ' s policy dated 2/2023, titled, admission Orders, indicated the orders should allow facility staff to provide essential care to the resident consistent with the resident ' s mental and physical status on admission. This facility ' s policy also indicated the admission orders should provide information to maintain or improve the resident ' s functional abilities until staff can conduct a comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary care plan. The facility ' s policy dated 2/2023, titled, Walking Rounds Shift Report, indicated it is the policy of this facility to use walking round shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and the facility ' s policy, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours for one of three residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to not meet the individual needs of the resident and cause a negative clinical outcome. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy dated 2/2023, titled, Baseline Care Plan, indicated the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. This policy also indicated the baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a resident ' s admission. The baseline care plan policy will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident. During a review of Resident 2 ' medical record, the admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the temperatures were at comfortable levels for six of 21 sampled Resident Rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER],5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). These failures resulted in Resident 1 to be uncomfortable, feeling hot and sweaty. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment , undated, indicated: 1. In accordance with residents' right, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. 2. The facility will maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels - The facility should strive to keep the temperature in common resident areas between 71- and 81-degrees Fahrenheit (F). During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute myocardial infraction (commonly known as a heart attack, usually occurs when a blood clot blocks blood flow to the heart. Without blood, tissue loses oxygen and dies),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure room temperatures were at a comfortable level for six of 21 resident rooms sampled. This failure had the potential for 11 of 44 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11) to be susceptibility to loss of body heat, risk of hyperthermia and the actual feelings of being hot, sweaty, having difficulty breathing and not wanting to stay in their room. Findings A review of the facility's, undated, policy titled Resident Rights revealed, The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. A review of the facility's, undated, policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment revealed, 7. The facility will maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels. a. The facility should strive to keep the temperature in common resident areas between 71- and 81-degrees Fahrenheit (F). During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:47 am,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to personal privacy for one of one resident (Resident 1), when medical treatment was provided to Resident 1 without privacy being provided by staff. This failure had the potential to cause distress for Resident 1 and threaten her health and well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's, undated, policy titled Resident Rights revealed Privacy and confidentiality. The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. a. Personal privacy includes accommodations, medical treatment, written and telephone communications, personal care, visits, and meetings of family and resident groups, but this does not require the facility to provide a private room for each resident. A review of Resident 1's undated admission Record , indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including lung disease, diabetes (high sugar in the blood), heart disease, blindness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the communication call light system was working for two of three residents (Resident 1 and 2), sampled for working call lights, when Resident 1 and Resident 2's call light would not stay on after the button was depressed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 and 2 to be at risk for accidents and their care needs not to be met. Findings A review of the facility's, undated, policy titled Call lights: Accessibility and timely Response indicated The purpose for this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. A review of Resident 1's undated admission Record , indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including lung disease, diabetes (high sugar in the blood), heart disease, blindness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's current status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when his admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) dated 3/3/2024, inaccurately assessed that Resident 1 was admitted with an indwelling catheter (a catheter that is maintained within the bladder for the purpose of continuous drainage of urine into a drainage bag). This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive treatments and care that met their individual needs. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, no revised date provided, indicated: 1. Qualified staff who are knowledgeable about the resident will conduct an accurate assessment addressing each resident ' s status, needs, strengths, and area of decline. The assessment will be documented in the medical record. 2. The appropriate, qualified health professional will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized and comprehensive care plans that identified the needs for one of five sampled residents who was exhibiting a behavior issue by constantly removing all his clothes (Resident 1). These failures had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive the necessary care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, no revised date provided, indicated: 1. It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident ' s medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident ' s comprehensive assessment. 2. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services were provided to one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) who was exhibiting the sign and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI, bacteria in urinary system) when Urinalysis (UA, a urine specimen that determines if there is a bacterial infection in the urine)) was not done in a timely manner as ordered. This failure had the potential for delaying Resident 1 ' s treatment and to develop urosepsis (systemic body infection) and other related clinical complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, indicated that he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included arthritis (painful inflammation and stiffness of the joints), end stage renal disease (a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), dependence on renal dialysis (the process of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the laundry practices were implemented, and handled and processed in a safe and sanitary manner when numerous bags of soiled laundry were observed to be overflowing the laundry room and stored inside a broken dryer. This failure had the potential to spread disease and infection throughout the facility. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Policies and Practices – Infection Control, revised 10-2018, indicated: 1. This facility ' s infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of disease and infections. 2. The objectives of our infection control policies and practices are to: a. Prevent, detect, investigate, and control infections in the facility; b. Maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for personnel, residents, visitors, and the general public . During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in a timely manner for 3 (Residents #8, #6, and #19) of 5 residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Assessment Frequency/Timeliness, with a copyright date of 2023, revealed, The purpose of this policy is to provide a system to complete standardized assessments in a timely manner, according to the current RAI Manual. The policy specified, 5. The annual assessment will be completed not less than once every 12 months. It will be completed within 366 days after the ARD [Assessment Reference Date] of the most recent OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] comprehensive resident assessment and within 92 days of the ARD of the previous quarterly or significant correction of a quarterly assessment (SCQA). A review of the CMS Long-Term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements, 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #11) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 1 (Resident #40) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, with a copyright date of 2023, revealed, The purpose of this policy is to assure [sic] that all residents receive an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas. The policy further indicated, 3. The appropriate, qualified health professional will correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identifies resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent potential worsening of pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #11) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently implement and provide wound treatments as ordered by the Wound Specialist and failed to follow the Wound Specialist's recommendations for Resident #8 and Resident #11. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Wound Care, revised in October 2010, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. 1. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #8 on 10/21/2016 and readmitted the resident on 12/09/2018. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, and atherosclerotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) #2 and LVN #3) of 2 LVNs observed administering insulin pens were trained on the proper use of insulin pens and their skillsets were evaluated to ensure they could competently administer insulin pens in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. This failure affected 2 (Resident #32 and Resident #8) of 2 residents observed receiving insulin by way of an insulin pen injection and had the potential to affect all 10 of 10 residents with orders for insulin pens. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, revised in August 2022, revealed, Our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. The policy revealed, 6. Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain laboratory testing for 3 (Residents #8, #13, and #23) of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated February 2023, revealed, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law. The policy revealed, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. The policy revealed, All laboratory reports will be dated and contain the name and address of the testing laboratory and will be filed in the resident's clinical record. 1. A review of Resident #8's admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #8 on 10/21/2016 and most recently admitted the resident on 12/09/2018. The admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident #144 and Resident #143) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dignity were treated with dignity and respect. Specifically, staff searched Resident #144's personal belongings without consent, and a staff member responded to Resident #143 by using profanity during a conversation with the resident. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised in February 2021, revealed, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. 1. During the entrance conference on 01/02/2024 at 9:16 AM, the Administrator reported the facility was a non-smoking facility. A review of Resident #144's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/29/2023. A review of Resident #144's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/2023, revealed Resident #144 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 (Resident #144) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse allegations. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, with a copyright date of 2023, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy further specified, 2. The Administrator is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator (or designee) in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with state law. The section of the policy titled VI. Reporting/Response revealed, 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #13) of 5 residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Assessment Frequency/Timeliness, with a copyright date of 2023, revealed, The purpose of this policy is to provide a system to complete standardized assessments in a timely manner, according to the current RAI Manual. The policy specified, 4. A quarterly review assessment will be completed no less than once every 3 months. It must be completed within 92 days of the ARD [Assessment Reference Date] of the most recent OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] assessment. A review of the CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, under Chapter 2: Assessments for the RAI revealed Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow-up on Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) recommendations for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 09/14/2023 with diagnoses that included unspecified psychosis and dementia with psychotic disturbance. A review of Resident #1's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening, dated 09/15/2023, revealed the result was positive for suspected mental illness. The Level I PASRR indicated the resident had a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis and received psychotropic medication. The letter attached to the Level I PASRR, dated 09/15/2023, indicated that a Level II Mental Health Evaluation was required. A review of Resident #1's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Individualized Determination Report, dated 09/20/2023, revealed specialized services were recommended to address the resident's mental health needs. These recommendations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the use of bed rails was reflected on the comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #29) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for the use of bed rails. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in March 2022, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy specified, 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes, b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. The policy further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician orders for 1 (Resident #23) of 5 residents reviewed for medication use. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, revealed Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy revealed, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. A review of Resident #23's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/02/2023 with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Record revealed the resident discharged from the facility on 12/01/2023. A review of Resident #23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/2023, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed the resident had an active diagnosis of hypertension. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete pre- and post-dialysis assessments before and after each dialysis appointment for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis care. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Dialysis, with a copyright date of 2023, revealed, The facility will assure [sic] that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include: *Ongoing assessment and oversight of the resident before, during and after dialysis treatments, including monitoring of the resident's condition during treatments, monitoring for complications, implementation of appropriate interventions, and using appropriate infection control practices: [sic] and *Ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. A review of Resident #26's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/19/2023 and readmitted the resident on 10/30/2023 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure bed rail assessments reflecting the need for bed rails were conducted and informed consents were obtained prior to the use of bed rails for 2 (Resident #29 and Resident #11) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for the use of bed rails. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised in August 2022, revealed, The use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met. The policy specified, 8. Before using bed rails for any reason, the staff shall inform the resident or representative about the benefits and potential hazards associated with bed rails and obtain informed consent. The following information will be included in the consent: a. The assessed medical needs that will be addressed with the use of bed rails; b. The resident's risks from the use of bed rails and how these will be mitigated; c. The alternatives that were attempted but failed to meet the resident's needs; and d. The alternatives that were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, facility policy review, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 3 medication errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.71 %, affecting 3 (Residents #32, #8, and #22) of 10 residents observed during medication administration. Specifically, licensed nursing staff did not prime an insulin pen (safety test) in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines prior to administering insulin to Resident #32 and Resident #8, and staff administered the wrong inhaler and dosage to Resident #22. In addition, when staff administered two puffs of the wrong inhaler to Resident #22, the nurse did not wait one minute between puffs as directed by the manufacturer's guidelines. Findings included: 1. A review of the Instruction Leaflet for Lantus SoloStar (insulin glargine injection), revised in November 2018, revealed, Step 3. Perform a Safety test. Always perform the safety test before each injection. Performing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff documented the administration of medication for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents sampled for medication review and failed to document the completion of wound care for 1 (Resident #8) of 2 residents reviewed for wound management. Findings included: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, revealed Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy revealed Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. A review of Resident #5's admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #5 on 11/30/2017 and readmitted the resident on 12/05/2023. The admission Record revealed diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). A review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/13/2023, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccination status was offered the influenza vaccine. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Influenza Vaccination, copyright 2022, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from influenza by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers annual immunization against influenza. The policy specified, 2. Influenza vaccinations will be routinely offered annually from October 1st through March 31st unless such immunization is medically contraindicated, the individual has already been immunized during this time period, or refuses to receive the vaccine. 3. Additionally, influenza vaccinations will be offered to residents upon availability of the seasonal vaccine until influenza is no longer circulating in the facility's geographic area, and 9. The resident's medical record will include documentation that the resident and/or the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #23) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccination status was offered the Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Novel Coronavirus Prevention and Response, dated 09/01/2022, revealed, All residents who are not up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses and are new admission and readmissions should be placed in quarantine, even if they have a negative test upon admission; COVID-19 vaccination should also be offered. During the entrance conference on 01/02/2024 at 9:16 AM, the Administrator reported the facility's former Infection Preventionist (IP) ended their employment the previous Friday on 12/29/2023 unexpectedly, noting she would put someone in that position later in the day. At 11:39 AM, the Administrator said the Corporate IP would be filling in as the facility's interim IP. A review of Resident #23's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/02/2023 with diagnoses that included aftercare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet this requirement when quarterly care conferences were not held for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This resulted in the facility's failure to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was ireviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team who had knowledge of the resident's needs, and that each resident and resident representative was involved in developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning--Resident Participation, dated 2023, indicated: The facility will discuss the plan of care with the resident and/or representative at regularly scheduled care plan conferences, and allow them to see the care plan, initally, at routine intervals, and after significant changes. The facility will make an effort to schedule the conference at the best itme of day for the resident/resident's representative. The facility will obtain a signature from the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility: 1. Failed to designate a Director of Nursing (DON) after DON left the faciity on 9/27/2023. 2. Failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for a minimum of 8 hours on the following days: September 2, 3, 4, 28, 29, 30 and October 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 15, 22, 23, 24, and 28 of 2023. These failures resulted in decreased supervision of nursing staff to ensure the delivery of quality of care of all residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's DON Job Description, copyright 2023, the indicated the DON will: - Participate in daily or weekly management team meetings to discuss resident changes in status, complaints, or concerns (e.g., frequent falls, mood changes). - Ensure delivery of compassionate quality care and nursing supervision as evidenced by adequate staff coverage on the units and maintaining optimal resident function. - Oversee nursing schedules to ensure resident needs are met. - Perform rounds to observe residents and ensure nursing needs are being met. - Communicate directly with residents, medical and nursing staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure the health and safety of Resident 1 when facility staff did not identify, report, protect and investigate allegations of abuse. This resulted in Resident 1 having pain, emotional distress and had the potential to put all residents at risk for abuse. Refer to F 697. Findings:A review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated July 2022, indicated it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility will have written procedures to assist staff in identifying the different types of abuse - mental/verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and the deprivation by an individual of goods and services by resident, staff or family report of abuse. Ensuring the health and safety of each resident with regard to visitors such as family members or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a non-verbal resident (Resident 1) had a plan of care for pain that met her needs when her pain was not monitored, reassessed, and physician was not notified of changes. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing increased pain levels and had the potential to negatively affect the resident's physical and psychosocial (emotional and social) well-being and decrease mobility, function, and quality of life. Refer to F607. Findings:During a review of facility policy Pain Management, dated 2023, the policy indicated: - The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. - The facility will observe for nonverbal indicators which may indicate the presence of pain to include: loss of function or inability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), (e.g., rubbing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional food safety standards when: 1. The kitchen was not sanitary. 2. Staff were not wearing aprons. 3. Fixed equipment (equipment that cannot be cleaned in the dish washer or in the three-compartment sink) was not washed and rinsed prior to sanitizing. 4. Food was not stored, labeled, dated or discarded appropriately. 5. Nutrition supplements stored on medication carts and distributed by nursing during medication administration were not monitored for safe temperatures, stored or discarded within food safety guidelines. 6. The ice machine was not sanitary. 7. An air gap was not present in the cook's food preparation sink. These practices have the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents consuming food from the facility food services. Findings: 1. The kitchen was not sanitary. A review of the facility policy titled Sanitation dated 2001 shows All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean . All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-15 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to help residents, their families and other visitors understand safe food handling practices for food brought in from outside sources. This failure has the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness for residents receiving food brought in by their families or others. Findings: A review of the undated facility policy titled Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors directs staff how to handle food safely after it is brought in, but there is no indication safe food handling education is provided to residents or their family members regarding food they bring to the resident. During an interview at the nurses' station on 07/14/21 at 04:50 PM, Licensed Nurse A (LN-A) stated she wasn't sure if any education regarding safe food handling was provided to residents or family on admission. She suggested the social services staff (SOC) would know about it. During an interview in the social services office on 07/14/21 at 04:52 PM, the SOC stated she didn't know if that information or education was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and document reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents and staff when: 1. Oxygen tanks were stored in an unlocked closet, without separation of empty and full tanks. 2. Hand washing and resident care supplies were stored under the sink in the Clean Utility Room. 3. Expired Foley insertion kits (used for insertion of a urinary catheter into the bladder) stored in the Clean Utility Room cupboard were available for use. 4. Laundry dryer area had lint buildup on the wall, around the ceiling vent, on top of the dryer and around the hinges of the door jam. 5. Two plastic bags of clean linen were being stored on the floor in a Clean Linen closet. 6. Floors, walls, ceiling and cabinets in the Food and Nutrition Services kitchen were not maintained in good repair when wholes, cracks and missing pieces of surfaces were observed. These failures had the potential for resident and staff safety to be jeopardized, to create an environment for germs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This regulation was not met when a total of three of 25 medication pass opportunities included errors in administration technique. This resulted in an error rate of 12 percent, and medication doses not being delivered per manufacturer specifications and professional standards, with the potential of continued illness. Findings: 1. On 7/13/2021 at 8:10 AM, Licensed Nurse (LNB) was observed administering Dulera inhaler 200 micrograms to Resident 25. The nurse did not shake inhaler prior to administering to resident. Additionally, medication was administered after resident had already taken a deep breath and was holding her breath. Resident exhaled medication held in her mouth and then took a deep breath afterwards. No instruction was given to Resident 25 by LNB regarding the proper technique. 2. On 7/13/2021 at 12:10 PM, LNB was observed administering a Combivent/Respimax inhaled medication to Resident 4. The nurse did not shake the medication. In a concurrent interview, LNB stated, As a general nursing practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This regulation was not met when a total of three of 25 medication pass opportunities included errors in administration technique. This resulted in medication doses not being delivered per manufacturer specifications and professional standards, with the potential of continued illness due to ongoing errors in technique over time. Findings: 1. On 7/13/2021 at 8:10 AM, Licensed Nurse (LNB) was observed administering Dulera inhaler 200 micrograms to Resident 25. The nurse did not shake inhaler prior to administering to resident. Additionally, medication was administered after resident had already taken a deep breath and was holding her breath while the inhaler was put in her mouth. Resident blew out medication held in her mouth and then took a deep breath afterwards. No instruction was given to Resident 25 by LNB regarding the proper technique. 2. On 7/13/2021 at 12:10 PM, LNB was observed administering a Combivent/Respimax inhaled medication to Resident 4. The nurse did not shake the medication. In a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the qualifications, competencies, and skill sets of the Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) were in place to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when: 1. There was inadequate oversight and collaboration provided by the RD for the DSS to ensure essential food service and food safety systems were in place. 2. The roles and practices of the RD and the DSS were incongruent with job descriptions, the RD contract, and professional scope of practice in the completion of essential tasks such as oversight of the kitchen, and care planning in the provision of resident care. These actions have the potential to result in foodborne illness, compromised nutritional status, ineffective resident care interventions, and decreased quality of life for the 32 residents living in the facility. Findings: During intermittent review of facility dietetic services from 7/12-7/15/21 between the hours of 08:00 AM and 05:00 PM multiple issues surrounding lapses in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide a comfortable and homelike environment for four residents (Residents 4, 14, 15, and 16) when the bathroom they shared was in disrepair. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 4's clinical record showed admission to the facility on 4/19/2021 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and depression. A review of Resident 14's clinical record showed admission to the facility on 5/8/2005 with diagnoses that included dementia (a mental disorder) and schizophrenia (disorganized thought and perception). A review of Resident 15's clinical record showed admission to the facility on 7/10/2018 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a chronic disease of the central nervous system that affected movement, thought and mood) and anxiety. A review of Resident 16's clinical record showed admission to the facility on 1/4/2019 with diagnoses that included chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, this requirement was not met when two of 25 sampled residents' (Resident 11 and 21) nursing care plans were not revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. This resulted in care plans that did not comprehensively reflect successful and unsuccessful interventions and led to repeated falls and the potential for serious injury. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Comprehensive dated 2001 indicated as follows: An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Additionally, the policy indicated, 8. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised and information about the resident and the resident's condition changes, and, 10. The resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical or nursing treatments. When such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, this requirement was not met when three of 25 sampled residents' nursing care plans were not reviewed and revised following each assessment. This resulted in care plans that did not indicate the date and time of new interventions, or the date and time of discontinued, unsuccessful interventions, and did not tie them to any particular assessment dates. This had the potential for repeated falls and serious injury. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Comprehensive dated 2001 MedPass indicated as follows: An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Additionally, the policy indicated, 8. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised and information about the resident and the resident's condition changes, and, 10. The resident has the right to refuse to participate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, this requirement was not met when there were medications available for use that were labeled past the manufacturer's expiration date. These failures could result in the accidental administration of expired medications or biologicals to residents with questionable potency or sterility. Findings: In an observation of the medication refrigerator at Nursing Station 1 on 7/12/21 at 13:14 PM a box labeled Afluria Quadrivalent influenza vaccine (serial number 0033332320011, lot 60781V03), indicated an expiration date of 6/30/2021. In a concurrent interview, MDS (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) confirmed that the drug label indicated the medication was expired, and stated, it should have been to be taken out. In an observation of the medication refrigerator at Nursing Station 1 on 7/12/21 at 13:21 AM, a bottle of Sterile Diluent indicated that it was dispensed on 6/30/20 and expired 6/30/21. In a concurrent interview, [NAME], LVN stated that the bottle was supposed to be kept with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have an effective system in place to monitor and ensure resident meal tray accuracy and that food preferences were honored. This has the potential to result in residents receiving foods and textures non-compliant to their diet orders, food allergens, and foods identified as resident preference dislikes on their meal tray. Findings: During an observation on 07/12/21 12:12 PM the AM Diet Aide (AM DA) pre-loaded drinks and silverware on to resident lunch trays. The AM Cook-A looked at the tray ticket, dished the hot food and placed it on the tray. During an observation of lunch meal service and concurrent interview on 07/12/21 at 12:22 PM, the meal tray ticket for Resident 25 listed Dislikes: No tomato sauce, No punch. The AM DA put punch on Resident 25's tray. He identified the red fluid in the cup as punch. The AM Cook-A dished gravy over meatloaf topped with red sauce and put it on Resident 25's tray. There was no double check system in the kitchen to ensure the meal tray was accurate or that resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diet for one resident was prescribed by the attending physician. This failure has the potential to result in residents receiving food that is not in an appropriate form or with appropriate nutrient content to support the resident's safety, treatment, care plan, goals and preferences. Findings: A review of the facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders dated 2001 showed Only authorized, licensed practitioners, or individuals authorized to take verbal orders from practitioners shall be allowed to write orders in the medical record. Verbal orders must be recorded immediately in the resident's chart by the person receiving the order and must include prescriber's last name, credentials, and date and the time of the order. Verbal orders must be signed by the prescriber at his or her next visit. Nursing staff will use a diet change notification form to inform the Food Services staff when diet orders change. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$59,794 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $59,794 — penalty dated 2024-01-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-09 for 23 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AJC HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SWC CA OPCO 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2022
CHESLEY, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 03/01/2022
TODD, CAMERONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2021
GAMETT, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+19.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 30%Other / private 8%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$430per resident / day
operating cost
$13,061per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$536per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055612. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next